Payment proposal are not captured some vendor - TCODE F110

Hi All experts,
I'm add new Special GL ind. in F-43 to reclass PPI to PPO.
I'm successfully add it and also successfully reclass the acc and Post it.
The problem come when we try to run payment proposal (TCODE F110),
the vendor that we reclass are not appear on the list.
What acctuall happened?
Is there anything i'm missing on config?
Regards,
Shah

Hi Murukan,
Thanks for you reply.
I'm doing config for Special GL in FBKP.
I'm put Reccon. acc and Special G/L Acc in.
After that, directly do transaction in F-43 using this new Special GL ind.
I'm not doing any config in FBZP.
What should I do actually in FBKP?
I'm really no idea. this is my first time face it.
Regards,
Shah

Similar Messages

PAYMENT PROPOSAL COULD NOT BE CARRIED OUT

I did payment run program for one vendor F110 i have 3 invoice. within this invoice one invoice i did payment block at the time of payment proposal in F110 , the remaining two i cleared and i got all result after some days according to the next payment run date i am trying to do payment run F110, At the time schedule proposal the error system showing "PAYMENT PROPOSAL COULD NOT BE CARRIED OUT". Now i need clear that invoice wht i do through F110.....
Moderator: Please, use proper forum and don't post in CAPITAL letters

Hi,
Please go to Su01 enter your user ID click on default Tab and in output Device field please enter Output device and then re-run the proposal again.
Hope it helps.
Br,Vivek

Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor, Message no. 8I565;

Hi Gurus,
We have up-graded system from 4.7 to ECC 6.0, Now encountering following error while capturing Excise at MIGO.
Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor 0000202040. Message no. 8I565;
Kindly suggest a solution for the above error.
Best regards
Naveen D'Souza

Hello ,
Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor 0000202040. Message no. 8I565
The above given error is common while MIGO while capture of excise invoice. The above written guys are correct, please check J1ID for that Vendor,
1) if after maintening also , suppose you get the above error while MIGO, then select "Only Part1" option in MIGO , and press Check Button, if error goes,
then again go back and select "Capture excise invoice", then system will not give you the above error while Capture of excise invoice in MIGO.
Please check some SAPOSS notes also.
Regards
Mahesh Naik.

The payment terms are not getting reflected in PO

Hi,
We are in SRM5.0 Extended Classic scenario.
We have created new payment term in ECC and transferred to SRM using BBP_UPLOAD_PAYMENT_TERMS and after tranferring it to SRM I am able to see the new payment term in table BBP_PAYTERM and BBP_PAYTERM_TEXT in SRM system.
But non of the payment terms are not reflecting into PO. We are not getting any errors while processing the PO.
Could you please suggest what may be the issue here.
Best Regards,
Siddappa

Hello Siddappa,
I am a little confused here with the scenario.
I understand that the payment terms are recenly created and replicated. So naturally they would have been updated in the relevant vendor master as well. Now has the vendor master been replicated to SRM from ECC once the payment terms were updated.
So from what you have mentioned "When we check the BBP_PD, the payment term is reflecting for the POs created after shopping cart approval."
So does this mean once the SC is approved then the PO is created and then the Terms of Payment are seen in the PO.
However "If the PO created through describe requirement, the Vendor will not assigned the PO created will go to Held status and buyer will process the order."
So does this mean since the Vendor is not mentioned the Terms of Payment is not being reflected and will happen only once the same is specified in the PO.
I have a question on whether after replicating the Payment Terms, has it been seen in any of the PO's created so far or it is always blank.
Regards
Pramod

Payment order are not defined for extended withholding tax

Hi Gurus,
Would you please help me with the message below. It appears on F110 when I try to pay a vendor open item with extended withholding tax:
Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax
In my company payment orders are created in F110 for accounts payable, as we use another ERP system (Baan) to perform the local accounts payments, and now I've just activated Extended withholding tax functionality With accumulation (necessary in Brazil) but I get this error.
Is it not possible to user payment order with extended withholding tax + accumulation? I find it hard to believe...
I've tried to unflag the payment order only for the payment method I'm using in FBZP t.code, but then no payment order were created but instead a payment document were posted with the withholding tax accumulation, but this is not the way we are working, and nothing is sent to Baan
any help is welcome

The payment method "Y" the option "payment order only" was marked?
For a withholding tax type with accumulation in a company code with extended withholding tax payment
methods that create only payment orders can´t be used. Payment orders can only be created only if there are
no tax types with accumulation involved in the paid items of the payment run.
The functionality extended withholding tax works fine for Brazil
however, you can´t use the payment order with this functionality.
Please, review your customizing for payment method 'Y" in transaction
FBZP.
Best regards,
Leonardo Vedovelli
FI Support Engineer
SAP Active Global Support

Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor 0000000957.

Hi,
As per our regular process we are capturing inovie with J1IEX and doing GR in MB01 now i have captured invoice in J1IEX and while making GR with MIGO i am getting error
Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor 0000000957. , but when i am making GR with MB01 i am not getting any error.
also what configuration required to capture excise invoice and make Gr in MIGO, as capture excise invoice menu is not coming in MIGO in MIGO Exicse tab i can only see only refer excise invoice , only part1 , no exicse registration.
regards,
zafar

Hi,
Do proper setings in Logistics - General -Tax on Goods Movements -India -Basic Settings -Maintain Excise Groups - select your excise group and check settings in MIGO Settings such as EI Capture, Post EI in MIGO, Duty different at GR.
Also ensure that you have maintained excise details for Vendor and Material in J1ID.
Regards,
Vikas

F110 - Message Payment proposal could not be carried out

Hi All,
Need help..
In the F110 Payment proposal when executed is showingh error
Payment proposal could not be carried out.
The log says
" Overlap with payment run 25.02.2009 DOREE     .... the execution of the payment program is terminated     .
I checked the payment proposal for 26.02.2009 and for that no parameters have been entered and it shows status as " No parameters entered as yet ".
But when I went to menu path , there is no option to delete this run.
How do I getaway with this previous run which has problems..?
Regards,
Jaya

Hi ,
table "reguh" doesn't have any entries pertaining to this payment proposal.
It is just that parameters are entered and proposal is being run.
proposals are not yet created. I believe in the process it is hitting an error and then coming out saying
proposal canot be carried out.
Tried the previous solution by having the additional log parameters and all.
But still log only shows :
Log for proposal run for payment on 26.03.2009, identification DORE
Overlap with payment run 25.02.2009 DOREE
... the execution of the payment program is terminated
End of log
How to delete this payment run 25.02.2009 DOREE
thanx
Jaya

Table changes in database are not captured in ODI model level

Hi All,
Can any one help me how to fix the bug in ODI.
Table changes in database are not captured in ODI model level.
Thanks in advance

I created the interface which is running successfully.
Now i did some changes in target table(data base level).
I reversed the updated table in model section. Till here its ok
The table which is updated in the model section is not automatically updated in the interface.
I have to drop the existed datastore in the interface and and re do the entire process of bringing the updated datastore, mapping,etc..
Please tell the any alternate way.
Regards
suresh

Special cursor are not captured in Captivate 6

We try to create software simulation of Russian analog of AutoCAD, named KOMPAS-3D.
In this program we are working with CAD drawings. And then in this software we are moving mouse over some objects of drawing like line or circle (or section in 3d drawing) - cursor are changing to special cursor symbol.
Important –> in this case cursor are changing not after mouse click. He changing with event mouseover.
But then we try to capture work with drawing in KOMPAS-3D – this special cursor symbols are not captured.
We try to use AC 6 for this screen capturing and can’t capture our special cursor symbols.
But in AC 5.5 – its work fine!
Help us please!

Hi
You might already know this, but stating it here to rule out the simple failure cases.
I have had a similar problem in the past using VTML tags inside Captivate. I used to type the slidenotes in my favorite editor and then copy paste the text from there to the slidenotes panel of Captivate. Turns out that my editor was using Unicode and hence the entire text pasted into Captivate slidenotes became unicode text, including the VTML markers. Though the pasted text "looked" fine the markers were messed up (for example, the double quotes around the value attributes looked like double quotes but they were actually multibyte unicode sequences) and this confused Neospeech. The output audio would be funny (for example it would read "Less Than...V...T...M...L...") or NeoSpeech will crash taking down Captivate along with it.
The fix was quite simple. I started typing the slide notes from within Captivate slide notes panel and everything worked fine after that. Alternately I could type in my favorite editor (after making sure that it is operating in Plain text mode) and then copy paste work flow also worked fine.
Another common mistake (at least, I do that often) is to select the speech agent from the drop down at the top of the dialog and forgetting to choose the speech agents for individual slide notes, which may still be referring to a non-neo-speech agent which does not understand the VTML tags.
No other software tool was required like the German Adobe Support team may have mentioned. I am using Captivate 7.
Cheers
Siva

MIRO issue (urgent!), amount and quantity fields are not captured from PO

Hi,
When we try to post thought MIRO using PO as reference, quantity and amount fields are not captured. We do MIGO first and then MIRO.
GR based invoice verification in the vendor master is selected and the check mark GR-based in the PO is selected too.
We're getting this MIRO issue for "all" PO and Service Entry Sheet.
We'll appreciate your recommendation in order to fix this critical issue as soon as possible.
Thanks in advance.

I was looking for copy controls and other functions. Glad this is now resolved. You need to award yourself points!
Cheers.

Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor: GRN error

Dear All,
We have upgraded our Ecc 6.0 system to latest application SAPKH60016 ( SAP_APPL ). WHile testing the system, for import GR's we are getting error saying Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor. J1ID is also maintained & previously we have received lot of GR's for the same vendor. No changes have been done to Vendor & CIN master.
Please let me know if any note or object to be updated to correct this error.
Thanks
Raghavendra.

hiii
Can u tel me where exactly the excise range was missing ??
Because if excise range is missing , it won't throw this lind of error .
U have found any other???????
Thnaks
SAP-MM

Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax

Hi Gurus,
Would you please help me with the message below:
Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax
In my company payment orders are created in F110 for accounts payable, as we use another ERP system (Baan) to perform the local accounts payments, and now I've just activated Extended withholding tax functionality With accumulation (necessary in Brazil) but I get this error.
Is it not possible to user payment order with extended withholding tax + accumulation? I find it hard to believe...
I've tried to unflag the payment order only for the payment method I'm using in FBZP t.code, but then no payment order were created but instead a payment document were posted with the withholding tax accumulation, but this is not the way we are working, and nothing is sent to Baan
any help is welcome !
TREAD LOCKED SINCE IT IS DUPLICATED FROM THREAD payment order are not defined for extended withholding tax

Hi,
On the analysis, the system expects an entry in the T059Q table with
code as XX.
The reason being in the extended withholding tax we use multiple
witholding tax codes and these entries are stored in the table
with_item. And in BSEG we populate the field withholding tax code i.e.
BSEG-QSSKZ with the value 'XX'. In classical withholding tax we used to
store the code directly which is not possible with Extended withholding
tax.
As the field BSEG-QSSKZ refers to the values in the table T059Q-QSSKZ
the entry 'XX" needed in this table for the corresponding country of the
company code to maintain the correct relationship and consistent
database information.
Hence for the statistical purpose and for the internal calculations we
need an entry in the table T059Q. Could you please maintain this code
i.e. 'XX' also in the table T059Q in a test system? Then retest your issue.
This should resolve your issue.
Kind Regards,
Vanessa.

Business area not capturing

Dear Experts
Business area not capturing for tax code while doing invoice verification.
Can anyone helpme
Regards
Kumar

Hi
Use t-code F.5D and F.5E for business area adjustment, Or else consult you FI Consultant
he Business area is never filled in automatic posting such as taxes or bank accounts. You have to customize the adjustment retroactively in the IMG. You will find it in "General ledger Accounting -> Business Transactions -> Closing -> Regrouping ..." Once you have set all the accounts require, in functional you have to run all the Regroup transactions (General Ledger -> Periodic Processing -> Closing -> Regroup -> Balance Sheet Adjustment ...)
This process ensures the zero balance per business area necessary for
creating business area balance sheets.

Dedection is not capturing in vendor payment advice

Hi All,
I need your help to slove this problem,
when i run F-58 print with payment in that payment advice dedection amout is capturing in dedection coloum,
when i run APP (F110) in payment advice dedection amount is not capturing in dection coloum
for both the programe we are using same payment advice form.
thanks & Regards
Kirin

Hi
When i am trying to post the document by manually simulation itself i am getting the fund value automatically but during manual posting without simulation i am trying to post the document at that time fund value is not populated automatically. Please help.
Regards
K.Gunasekar

Multiprovider is not capturing some fields data

Hi Friends,
               I got a proble when iam working on multiprovider,where i have taken two cubes into that multiprovider,now the problem is when i execute a report on muliprovider some fields are not populating with data.
{{cube are :billing cube(data sources:2lis_11_vaitm&2lis_13_vditm)
              account receivable item data(0fi_ar_4)}}
                       As this is RRI sender query having both cubes information,when i execute report when ever report captures first cube report the second cube data is not capturing vice versa.
Thanks and Regards
Gunasekhar

Could be a problem on identification (setting on multiprovider).
Try to execute on transaction RSRT your query
execute + debug
on debug option set "Multiprovider explain"
and report the log in this post.

Payment proposal are not captured some vendor - TCODE F110

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for