Payment run for vendor F110

hi Friends,
i am doing payment run for one vendor in F110. i am making payment by company code 2001(centralized payment system) for company code 2010. but it throwing the error that "company code 2001/2001 do not appear in proposal 07/20/2007 ABC1". here ABC1 is the identification i given for this payment run.
if i run payment for other vendors it s running with same set up.
Did any one faced this problem before that. can you please help me.
this is very urgent, i have to answere to the client.

Hi,
Mostly it will relate to the next posting date u wud have mentioned.
To know the correct reasoon, u can check the payment & Proposal logs
Suppose u run the APP twice in the same day, this error is frequent.
Regards.
Sridevi
<i>* Pls. assign points, if useful</i>

Similar Messages

Payment run for vendor failing "FM FI_PAYMENT_BANK_CHAIN_SET

Hi All,
Request your help with an issue that I am facing while doing Payment Run for a Vendor.
Payment run is failing with the error "Internal error: FM
FI_PAYMENT_BANK_CHAIN_SET,exception: CONVERSION_ERROR".
The Bank Settings have been maintained and the Correspondent Bank Account is
22 Characters long in table TBCHAIN21.Could this contribute to the error ?
Payments have gone through successfully for this Vendor for the same bank
account earlier.
If anyone has come across this kind of error, it would be of great help if
you could mention how you worked around this.
Thanks in Advance,
Uday Rekha P

Hi,
This error will come if the account number is more than 35 characters, 22 should be okay.
Just check the bank country and see whether an ISO code exists for the country in the IMG, T code OY01. If it is not there, maintain it.
Cheers.

Mass change of Payment Method for Vendor

Is there any way to do mass change of Payment Method for Vendor (trx. XK02) without ABAP? Need to change 1500 vendors.

HI
You can use transaction code MASS and object LFA1 to mass change the payment method.
Once entering you can select table LFB1 and do mass change based on some filter parameters.
Anand

Which number range is used for down payment requests for vendors?

Hi,
Which number range is usually used for down payment requests for vendors?
I would like to use it for:
Y002 vendors (emplyees)
Y004 vendors (1-time vendors)
Y005 vendors (confidential vendors)
The invoice will be posted via FI via Tcode FB60, FB65 & FB10 and F-02.
Thank you for your feedback.
Kind regards,
Linda

Hi
For down payment request the Document type is KA hence the number range which is applicable to KA is applicable for vendor downpament also.
In your case the number range is based on document types and not related to vendor types.
Thanks
Srinivas

F110 Payment run for multiple vendors

Hi
I will like to find out if I can select multiple vendors for my payment run in f110, so i dont keep entering the vendors each time i am trying to run payment. For instance I have payment method "Q" is it possible to create a variant that will automatically populate the vendors that use that payment method. also if it is possible to create an exception so that if there is a vendor in payment method "Q" that is not due for payment i can unselect them during my payment run.
I saw a similar question but the answers were not very clear to me.
Thanks

Hi Olany,
Instead entering individual vendors for payment give the range of vendors (E.g from 100000 to 999999) along with the payment method Q. This will select all invoices due for payments with payment method Q. If you require to exclude any inovice even if thos are due, this can be done via entering the invoice numbers in "Free selection" tab.
Regards
Nadini

Inter Business Area Restriction while doing Payment Run for a Vendor

Hi,
Currently we have a Vendor where Document gets posted in different Business Area. While executing the Payment Run (F110), I have to do a Payment for a Particular Businessa Area. I don't want to do through Free selection. Is there any other option to do a Payment for that Particular Business Area Documents.

Hi bala,
you can do by this way when U are giving input in the F110 screen, in that we have <b>Free selection</b> in that select the field name in that select the Business area and give the value. I think this is work it for your.
Regards,
Venkat
Message was edited by:
Venkateshwar Malathi

F110 payment run - split vendor invoice

Dear,
For some vendors, the payment of the invoices should be split over 2 bank accounts.
Currently they clear the invoice via transaction FB05 and split the amount over 2 bankaccounts for this vendor. Then we do the payment run.
This works fine but they loose a lot of time with this process.
Now we are looking for a process to avoid the clearing but split the amount during the payment run over 2 bankaccounts.
Are there some userexits where we can manipulate the REGUH/REGUP tables to do the manipulations by ourselves or is there a standard SAP approach to accomplish this ?
wkr,
Andy

Hi Andy,
Did you find the solution for the above requirement?
Vendor 1012 has a total amount of 100 euro.
60 % should be paid to account 1 (=60 euro)
40 % should be paid to account 2 (=40 euro).
Even I am trying to find the solution for the same requirement?
Kindly reply/
Regards,
Sravan

Payment has got blocked while running Automatic payment program for vendors

Dear Experts,
Greetings for the day !
I created a proposal for 10 vendors out of which one vendor payment has got blocked. The blocked payment is there in REGUS table. I just want to include the vendor in the current proposal. What could be the possible solution.
Thanks in Advance

Hello dear,
If it is blocked, means there is minimum one reason. Can be related to missiing payment method in master record for vendor FK02. Or there are missiing customizing in FBZP for ranking order or missing combinations for Payment method/currency and bank account
Please check first the master record, the documents to be paid (the invoice) and FBZP settings, then correct what is wrong.
Then, delete your proposal and create it again in F110
Hope this help
Regards
Tarek

Payment Run for Customers

Hi All,
In case of payment to the customer by executing/running F110, do we need to set up all customers as vendors in order for the F110 run to pick up the open items.
There is a Customer Accounts field where you can enter the range of customer accounts under "parameters" tab. Does these customer accounts have to be set up as vendors in order to pick up in the payment run or we can just enter the customer accounts without crearting them as vendors and it will pick up the open items due to pay to the customer.
Probably this is a very easy or basic question. I am confused so please answer me. I need to make payments to customers thru F110.
Regards,
Satya

Client has a difft scenario.
They pay to the customers for warranty and incentives. 2 ways to pay to the customer: generating payment run F110 within AR and the other being F110 from AP where all the customer open items are closed and sent to AP for payment using a custom program.
The problem with this is they have two interfaces each from AP and AR and aslo a custom program.
Now, solution is to pay all customers thru AP by setting each customer as vendor so that all the open items are picked in the payment run.
Next solution is to have single interface but paymentruns seperately from AR and AP. Both would send the files differently to Bank when paymnt run executed. Concern here is when both Ar and AP send files will the interface be able to handle it like 2 difft files or should there be any consolidation kind of thing.
Another question is, do we have to set up all customers as vendors in order to pay to the customer thru AP. There is customer accounts field where range of customer accounts can be added. Just by adding customer accounts, does it pick up the items for payment.
Please reply.
Satya

Payment proposal for vendor with multiple bank accounts

Hi there,
I'm currently dealing with payment proposals (F110) with two conditions:
1): several documents with different currencies are attached in the same payment run (one in GBP, one in USD and one in EUR)
2): several banks are defined for that vendor in the master data. We assume that that three banks are defined in the master records (one in GBP, one in USD and one in EUR)
We started developing a user exit to find a way to have the correct bank selected in depending on the document currency; it worked but only for one document-->payment is done to the right bank account even if the vendor has different bank accounts. Whenever several documents for the same vendor are included into the payment proposal, only one bank is selected out of our program, corresponding to the first document.
I wonder if there is a way for setting up a bank selection in another way.
NB: the partner bank type solution within the document is not an option as the sites (which are creating the PO) don't know about bank details and therefore don't indicate anything.
Thanks for reply!
regards,
FX

When you enter bank details in master, update field "Partner bank type" LFBK-BVTYP with free form value, may be currency is good choice.
During invoice entry, this field is available for update, update which bank to be used for payment of this invoice. You may build logic to populate this field, like substitution to populate currency in this field during invoice posting.
During payment, system checks value in field Partner bank type in invoice and selects corresponding bank.
Hope this helps.

Payment run for debit balances

Hey Folks:
How to block the invoice payments for vendors who has debit balances more than payments.
Debit balance > invoice amount.
Can someone please throw the light on the configuration I need to perform in Vendor Master and Payment Run config.
Appreciate your time.
NS

This is not pertaining to specific vendor. I want to generalize this rule. Rule being: Any vendor with debit balance should not get a check for invoices before it clears off debit balance.
I am trying to see on what basis F110 is picking up the invoices keeping aside the standard SAP (Standard SAP will not allow to cut the check if the vendor has debit balance).
So, I am actually thinking in terms of grouping key, which is actually grouping before it gets picked up by F110.
Please throw some light into this.

DME file issue: Payment run for Customers

Hi Gurus,
Please help me in the following problem.
I have done the configurations for automatic collection/refund using F110 for customers in our ECC 6 system. Iu2019m having a requirement as below.
1. Singular payments to be made for each customer transaction.  Have done that by checking u2018Singular paymentsu2019 check box in customer master data.
2. All payments should be collected in DME file at customer level even though the payments are multiple.  have done that by customizing the RFFOGB_T program.
3. Configurations are done for incoming (Receivables) and outgoing payments (refunds) in SAP and working fine.
Now the problem is, there is a requirement to net-off the monetary value of a customer in DME file i.e. if a customer having debits and credits then we need to net off the amounts and check whether itu2019s an incoming or outgoing payment to that customer. I have done the code changes for this requirement as well and it is working perfectly fine, however DME file produces 2 CONTRA lines one as debit to bank account and another as Credit to bank account (provided I have 2 customers in a run where one customer ends up in net debit balance, and another customer ends up with net credit balance). Our Bank doesn't accept more than one CONTRA in a single DME file.
Example scenario:
Customer1
Booking 1 -> 400 (Dr) & 200 (Cr)
Booking 2 -> 300 (Dr) & 100 (Cr)
Customer2
Booking 3 -> 100 (Dr) & 300 (Cr)
Currently If I run the payment run by having both incoming and outgoing payment methods, then my DME file will result as below
Customer 1 -> Dr 400
Customer 2 -> Cr 200
Bank account -> Cr 200
However our bank is not accepting the above DME since there are debits as well as credit data records in the same file.
Currently we are going with 2 separate payment runs, one for incoming and another for outgoing by this I could able to produce 2 DME files as below for the above customer bookings.
Payment run 1:
DME 1:
Customer 1 -> Dr 700
Customer 2 -> Dr 100
Bank account -> Cr 800
Payment run 2:
DME 2:
Customer 1 -> Cr 300
Customer 2 -> Cr 300
Bank account -> Dr 600
Both files are being accepted by Bank, however business is not agreeing this since for every customer transaction bank charges client. (There will be 2 transaction for same customer in the same day)
Anybody encountered the same problem? I need some suggestion on how to produce 2 DME files in a single payment run, one having only net debit balance customers and another having only net credit balance customers, so that on a particular payment run a customer will have only one transaction going into bank either Credit or Debit. Basically I need to produce DME files as below for the above customer bookings
Payment Run 1:
DME 1:
Customer 1 -> Dr 400
Bank account -> Cr 400
DME 2:
Customer 2 -> Cr 200
Bank account -> Dr 200
Please help.

Client has a difft scenario.
They pay to the customers for warranty and incentives. 2 ways to pay to the customer: generating payment run F110 within AR and the other being F110 from AP where all the customer open items are closed and sent to AP for payment using a custom program.
The problem with this is they have two interfaces each from AP and AR and aslo a custom program.
Now, solution is to pay all customers thru AP by setting each customer as vendor so that all the open items are picked in the payment run.
Next solution is to have single interface but paymentruns seperately from AR and AP. Both would send the files differently to Bank when paymnt run executed. Concern here is when both Ar and AP send files will the interface be able to handle it like 2 difft files or should there be any consolidation kind of thing.
Another question is, do we have to set up all customers as vendors in order to pay to the customer thru AP. There is customer accounts field where range of customer accounts can be added. Just by adding customer accounts, does it pick up the items for payment.
Please reply.
Satya

Payment Run for 1 method but different currencies.

Hi All,
We have a requirement where we have 1 House bank, 2 Bank accounts in that House bank (EUR, SGD) therefore 2 Account ID's, 2 Seperate cheque lots, but we have 1 payment method for Cheques. The required FBZP configuration has been done. We also have created 2 Payment variants (1 for EUR & other for SGD).
Now the issue is, how to run payment program using one proposal for 2 bank accounts? I mean, as we have 2 seperate cheque lots and 2 different bank accounts but one payment method and 1 proposal whcih is considering all the vendors with the open items, So how to Run the payment program which picks their respective cheque lots.
Thanks in advance,
Pallavi

Perhaps more details will be helpful:
In configuration of outgoing payments, you have to configure house bank selection so that you pick the same bank for the payment method and each currency.
Then you have to make sure that you configure the bank / payment method / currency combination to the correct accounts.
You have to maintain check lots for each account.
You have to maintain two variants for your checks: one for each currency. The variant must include house bank, account, payment method.
You maintain both variants in the same line for the program in F110.
Then when the payment program runs, each invoice will be paid by the correct house bank account based on your configuration for bank and account selection. When you do the printing, each variant should run separately, picking out the items based on their currency and house bank account.
This is basically the information in previous replies, with a bit more detail.
Good luck,
- Jeff

Housebank and payment method for vendor

Hi
While doing MIRO, i want housebank and payment method to populate from vendor master data. I maintained both these details in VM data but its not populating automatically in MIRO. Please help. (m using ECC 6)
Sadhana

Thanks Rinku.
If we keep house bank and payment method fields blank while doing data entry, system will pick them up from VM data at the time of payment run. Right??
But if the housebank field is mandatory for data entry (as in my scenario), then we have no option but to fill the fields up at the time of MIRO or FB60.
In my scenario, daily there are 150 bills processed at one centre, and the user has to fill up these two fields every time. Is there any other solution so that this trouble can be saved?
Thanks (points assigned).

Partial amount picked up in payment run(t.code F110)

Hello guru's,
I am facing strange problem in payment run.I have two invoices($10000+ $5000) due in one vendor account.when run the payemnt program. system clears the both documents but with differnt amount $3000. Hence, cheque was issued to vendor for $3000 rather than $15000. There are no credit notes are pending againt this vendor.It's production issue, please suggest me on priority.
Suitable answers would be rewarded.
thanks

Hi
Go to change proposal and choose the line item Credit note which is not be paid and select not to be paid (similar) & save.
Then only items for Rs. 15000$ will be paid.
Thanks
Colin Thomas

Payment run for vendor F110

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for