Payment term key with limit days in Extended Classic Scenario

Hello,
We have an SRM 4.0 implementation (SRM Server 5.0 with Support Package
9) using the Extended Classic Scenario.
When a shopping cart is created, it must be approved, and then a
purchase order is generated (first locally at SRM, and then is
replicated to the backend).
The problem is that the payment term key (field at header level EKKO-
ZTERM) of the backend purchase order is empty, only in cases when we use a payment term key which have several different values for the
field "limit days" (T052-ZTAGG in backend, BBP_PAYTERM-ZTAGG in SRM).
Example:
     ZTERM     ZTAGG
      K180           09
      K180           19
      K180           31
If the payment term key selected has no several values for the field "limit
days" (one single entry), the payment term key arrives correctly at the backend purchase order.
Example:
     ZTERM     ZTAGG
      E000           00
In SRM table BBP_PAYTERM we have upload the backend payment terms
(using report BBP_UPLOAD_PAYMENT_TERMS). In other threads it is said that you must copy the entries generated by the report with the logical system of the SRM system, but in extended classic scenario it seems to be not necessary.
We have already implemented note 846009, in order to use always the backend payment term, but the error didn’t get resolved.
We have our vendor business partners mapped to the local and backend
purchasing organizations, but it is only necessary indicate the Payment term key for the Backend Purchasing Organization.
Regards

hi,
Pls see the foll notes:
Note 576349 - Terms of payment in the ECS
Note 541934 - Modification note: Copying base date from T052
Note 953999 - ECS: Terms of Payment values not in PO header
<b>Note 940453 - Backend payment term data not updated in the extended PO
Note 945018 - Incoterms data not transferred to the back end</b>
BR,
Disha.
Pls reward points for useful answers.

Similar Messages

  • SC with Limit Item using Extended Classic Scenario?

    Hello,
    Can we implement SC with Limit Item using Extended Classic Scenario.
    I mention that we replicate the Product Categories from R/3 backend.
    We have tried to create a SC with Limit item, but the data on Quantity, Price and Tax is not picked up at PO level.
    Regards,
    Shaiek

    Hi
    Please try out this.
    For the time-being,
    Try de-activating all the custom BADI Implementations and check, what is happening, in the standard SRM system. How does it behave incase of limit item ?
    Incase it works fine, without any Custom Implementation active in the system, I suspect there is something wrong in your current deactivated BADI Implementation.
    Since i don't have access to your system , Please paste the code here.
    Hope this will help.
    Please reward suitable points.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Limit items on extended classic scenario.

    Hi everybody.
    We are working in SRM 4.0 with extended classic scenario.
    We are testing limit items (not service items), but I can not understand the limit item functionality.
    In SC, we can assign contracts form limit items. But when we create PO from the SC, there is not any relationship between PO and contract. Moreover when I create a PO (limit item) from null, I can not assign any contract (field is not available).
    In the other hand, in SC (limit item), I can select Follow-Up Actions as ‘Confirmation and Invoice’ or ‘Invoice’. If I select ‘Confirmation and Invoice’, when I create a PO, ECC return me a message error, because in ECC, good receives are not allowed for PO with limit item category.
    So, I have some questions:
    1. Can I use limit items in PO with contract reference?
    2. If yes, how can I do it? If not, what is the tab contracts functionality in SC with limit items?
    3. What is the functionality to allow confirmations in SC with limit items?
    4. Is there any documentation about limit item functionality?
    Thanks and regards.
    Raúl Moncada.

    Hello,
    As far as I know, this is a technical limitation. A work around would affect other functionalities.
    Note 1358679 corrected such issue.
    Regards,
    Ricardo

  • Limit Items in Extended Classic Scenario

    Hi,
    Could someone tell me how the Account assignment works for limit items in the standar behaviour?
    We are creating SCs with Limit items, and when creating them, we are entering the Account assignment as well. The fact is that when the confirmation is set (the good receipt), the Account assignment is needed again, as if the first assignment were not necessary or  even were not useful at all.
    Is this the standar behaviaur for limit items?
    Many thanks and regards,
    Ana
    P.D: We are working with SAP SRM 5.0.

    Hi!
    I forgot to tell that we made mandatory to enter the account assignment when creating the SC. Even though this, the account assignment has to be entered again when creating the confirmation.
    Many thanks and regards,
    Ana

  • Payment term combine with tolerance

    Dear all,
    I have a scenario. Is it possible if the user want to manage the payment term & combine with tolerance group?
    By example:
    If the vendor has 10 open items, which the total is an X amount.
    We just pay for the vendor if one of the open items is due AND the total X > 1,000,000 USD.
    How do we should do in the system ? Do you have any suggestion ?
    Thank you very much for your help,
    Tweety.

    Hello Tweety,
    The Tolerance limit we define in SAP is tolerance limit per document,
    When ever you are making a payment to a vandor each open item is one document, the system will check whether it is in tolerance limit or not but the system will not check with sum of all the open items of the vendor.
    As per my knowledge this is not possible through standard SAP.
    Regards
    Rama Krishna.A

  • Tolerance key DQ in extended Classic scenario give Backen error message

    Dear all,
    I am using SRM 7.0, SP 9 
    Extended Classic Scenario.
    I created a tolerance group and attached it to my user via TOG attribute in PPOMA_BBP. Tolerance key is DQ with $1000 and upper percentage 5%.
    I also set up the ECC tolerances:
    - Purchasing Value key with Tol. Overdelivery = 5.0 (in SPRO --> MM --> Purchasing --> Material Master --> Define Purchasing Value Keys)
    And assigned that Purchasing Value Key to the material group I am using (via SPRO --> MM --> Purchasing --> Material Master --> Entry Aids for Items Without a Material Master)
    - And I even set up tolerance key B1 (for error message) for my Company Code (in Spro -> MM --> IM and PI --> GR --> Set tolerance limits) with a upper limit of 5%
    And even with this set up I still get the error message
    u201CBackend Purchase Order quantity exceeded by 1 EAu201D
    when I try to post a Confirmation with an overdelivery, even if the over delivery is only 0.1% of the total quantity 1000.
    What Configuration am I missing?
    Cheers
    Ulrike

    Dear Rahul,
    Thanks for you input
    Let me give you an example of the behaviour:
    in PPOMA_BBP TOG assigned to user has : DQ with $1000 and upper percentage 5%.
    User orders a PO  with quantity=1000, price $100;
    No additional tolerances assigned in the PO itself
    User tries to enter confirmation with quantity 1001 (so qty variance converted to currency amount results in $100 over delivery) So the confirmation is under both the 5% and the $1000 limit.
    In that case I donu2019t receive an error message from the SRM, but the error message u201CBackend Purchase Order quantity exceeded by 1 EAu201D from ECC still prevents me from posting the Confirmation. And this is the problem I havenu2019t been able to solve so far.
    So I want the TOG tolerance to be used. And I am also happy with the absolute limit always having priority over percentage limit...
    But I am trying to find a way to get rid of the back end message (with assigning a tolerance to the PO itself as the will get rid of the absolute limit see my previous post.)
    Cheers
    Ulrike

  • Limit shopping carts in extended classic scenario

    How can we implement limit shopping carts in extended classic scenario. Has anyone done it? Thanks in advance

    Hi
    Which SRM version are you using ? It's possible to implement limit items concept in ECS Scenario.
    What exactly you are looking for ?
    Please have  a look to the following links as well.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/40/654d216f12754e9decdaf4d360bc1c/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/d1/77623c44696069e10000000a11405a/frameset.htm
    <b>Few SAP OSS Notes to refer in this case.</b>
    <u>Note 712702 ECS shopping cart with several limits
    Note 724261 Limit: Error during creation of local purchase order
    Note 694442 Limit SC: Customer fields not transferred to backend PO
    Note 690000 Limit SC: Customer fields not transferred in Backend PO
    Note 699255 Internal note and vendor text for LimitPO and LimitPReq
    Note 501977 Error with limit SC: "Unit measure has no ISO code"
    Note 520514 Limit, BBP_PD148: No account assignment details were adopted
    Note 514727 Limit: Contracts are not displayed in the status
    Note 516444 Account assignment check in the shopping cart with limit
    Note 515500 Limit:'Confirmation and invoice' indicator not transferred
    Note 515695 Invoice entry for limit shopping carts not possible</u>
    Regards
    - Atul

  • SAP eSourcing with SRM Extended Classic Scenario

    Hi Team,
    We are using ECC 6.0 with eSourcing. Currently we use SRM 5.0 with Classic Scenario.
    Now we are planning an upgrade from SRM 5.5 to SRM 7.0 and want to do the Extended Classic Scenario. This will help us to do additional functionalities of SRM.
    eSourcing can be used for Strategic RFx and CLM functionalities.
    SRM can be used for SC, Operational Sourcing and PO. We can also use the SRM-SUS Scenario for PO confirmation and Invoices.
    Have any one used eSourcing with SRM Extended Classic? In that case, please provide some light into how to use all these application to better streamline the overall Source to Procure strategy.
    Also, do you think Classic is the way to go or Extended Classic is better? Any documents or pictures are greatly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Jogy

    Hi
    SAP provide standard integration b/w ECC and Esourcing/ CLM (PR (both inbound and outbound). However in case you decide to go with extended classic scenario,you might need e Sourcing/ CLM integration with SRM (since PO would be created in SRM) which is not provided out of the box by SAP. However custom interface (based on flat file transfer) can be built b/w SAP SRM and e Sourcing.
    MM-SUS scenario is not much different from EBP-SUS scenario in terms of functionality.
    Regards
    Mudit Saini

  • 'BAPI_POEC_CREATE' function doesn't work with extended classic scenario

    Hi everybody.
    Antecedents:
    We are working in an extended classic scenario.
    When we create a Purchase Order via ITS in SRM, the system works ok, the PO is replicated in the ERP system.
    But when we execute “BAPI_POEC_CREATE” function module in order to create a PO in SRM, no message are available in the application monitor, but the PO is not replicated in the ERP system.
    Both exampled were created with exactly same data (partners, items, categories, accounts, …)
    Moreover when we modify the second PO created via ITS, the systems doesn’t show any error message, we can order our PO again without error, but the PO isn’t replicate in the ERP system.
    1. We executed “BAPI_POEC_GETDETAIL” function module, and there is only a difference between POs, E_PO_STATUS table.
    PO created by transaction has 8 entries:
           I1009 X
           I1015 X
           I1021
           I1038
           I1039 X
           I1043
           I1080 X
           I1180
    And PO created by BAPI has 5 entries:
           I1015 X
           I1021
           I1038
           I1043
           I1180
    2. We run “BBP_PD” transaction, and there is only a difference.
    PO created by transaction mode shows:
    - Message: W BBP_PD 830 Default values have been taken from Vendor PRUEBA10/purchasing organization Área Global Compras (org. compras)
    And PO created by BAPI
    - Message: No Messages
    Could anyone help me with the problem?
    Thanks in advance.
    Raúl.

    Hi Raúl,
    this is exact, BAPI_POEC_CREATE is designed to create local PO.
    If you want to replicate it to R/3, then you have to change it to an ECS PO.
    In BADI BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI, called at the real beginning of BBP_PD_PO_CREATE, you will have to change some data to enable the ECS scenario:
    - change header subtype to EP
    - change header log system to SRM (keep FI LS as is)
    - determine a backend purch group & org
    - complete BE fields (be_object_id, be_object_type, don't change be_log_system because it will be determined during the transfer, be_pur_org and be_pur_group will also be determined during the transfer)
    - ... and maybe other R/3 relevant fields
    Compare both PO one by one, and adapt the gaps.
    Rgds
    Christophe
    PS: please reward points for helpfull answers

  • ASN in Extended Classic Scenario with SUS

    Hi SRMer?
    Is it possible to create an ASN in SUS with Extended Classic Scenario (ECS)?
    OSS note 543544 mention that the scenario is limited for document types Purchase Order, Purchase Order Response and Change Order. Confirmations and invoices are not possible. There is no indication on ASNs.
    Any help will be appreciated.
    Regards.

    Hi
    Please go through these links ->
    SUS-MM Confirmation without ASN
    Re: Details on ASN
    The specified item was not found.
    SUS  ASN - mandatory field
    ASN Confirmation not created,
    Clarifications on EBP-SUS and MM-SUS Scenario
    Re: SUS-MM scenario with "POR (order ack.)" and ASN for free text
    Creating custom field in ASN screen of SRM SUS
    SUS Invoice
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Reservation with Extended classic scenario

    Hi ;o)
    I'm working at a costumer were we have extended classic scenario. We want to be able to make reservations in the backend if the item is on stock, and we have seen in a solution matrix from SAP that this should be possible.
    The configuration for reservations should be done according to the guides - but no reservations is created when ordering a stock material.
    I was searching on the developer network, and came across a topic, where it was stated that reservations could only be made with classic scenario (or using a BAdI where you switch the extended on and off depending on product category). Do any of you know if this is really a fact?
    Thanks in advance
    Maria Hvenegaard, Denmark

    Hi
    Read this first.
    <u>You can use BBP_CREATE_RES_BACK BADI using Se18 Transaction.
    This BADI You can find in SPRO -> Supplier Rel. Mngmt. -> SRM Server -> Business Add-Ins -> Follow-on document generation -> Reservation in Backend System</u>
    <u>If you want to create reservation, you have first to switch from ECS to classic scenario through BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI then you have to implement BBP_TARGET_OBJTYPE badi to determine the criteria to create a reservation in your backend.</u>
    <u>We need to maintian the customising setings in SPRO Transaction.
    Define objects in Back end systems. Maintain the document type EC or ECPO for Purchase Orders and not for creating reservations. Maintain number ranges (RS) and align the same to R/3 or backend systems. In setting up the org plan in the PPOMA_BBP Transaction, the attribute for resevation - Attribute BWA should be maintained too, if reservations are to be created in the backend system.
    Movement Type Accounting Object
    201 Cost Center
    221 WBS-Element
    231 Sales Order
    241 Asset
    Example :
    logicalsystemname\201</u>
    <u><b>Maintain the following Settings in the IMG using SPRO Transaction.</b>
    1.For internal Procurement > 1.Always Reservation for Material types Subjected to inv Mgmt
    2.For External Procurement >1.Always purchase Requisition.
    Note -> The plant that you use to create the shopping cart might not be extended to handle inventory management. Select a right plant which is extended to inventory management and you will see a reservation being created.</u>
    Be aware that:
    - with the classic scenario you can create PR, PO and/or Reservations in R/3, but there is no local purchasing document (except the SC), so all functions around the local PO will not be possible.
    - with the extended classic scenario, you can only create PO in the backend, but a local PO exists in SRM.
    Concerning GR, it is possible to make it in SRM for both scenario
    Hope this will help.
    Please reward suitable points, incase it suits your requirements.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • SRM 7 : Vendor record replication in backend with Extended Classic Scenario

    Hello,
    We are implementing SRM 7 with Extended Classic Scenario and Supplier Self-registration.
    Can you explain what is to be configured to get the new vendors replicated to the backend?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    It is possible to transfer suppliers to ERP system, if you use 'Supplier registration with ERP' scenario. After registration and acceptance, newly registered suppliers would appear on supplier monitor from where you can transfer them to backend system.
    Check the below link for more details:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/cf/35074152aff323e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
    Regards,
    Sanjeev

  • Can we use the Extended Classic Scenario with MM-SUS

    HI, expert :
        In extended classic scenario ,the PO created in SRM system ,and then replicated into the MM system .You  can't change it  in MM system .
        So, in this situation ,I want to know the MM-SUS can be  suitable or not ?The PO can transfer from ECC  to SUS ?
       If I use the decoupled  scenario  ,which one I can select ?MM-SUS or EBP -sus ?
       BR !
      Alex!

    Hi Alex,
    as noted by Bill, in MM-SUS is the extended classic not possible at all.
    By default it's also not supported in the SRM-SUS. Please see the note 543544. If you would like to activate this, you need to pay a consulting fee for SAP:
    "Please note that the full scenario can be enabled by a consulting solution, compare OSS note 700350."                                  
    Regards,
    Peter

  • Classic and extended classic scenario with one EBP

    Hello Guys
    If I have a one EBP and multiple ERP back ends. For one backend, I need to have classic and other to have extended classic scenario. How this can be fulfilled. Is it possible, if so please provide the configuration setup.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hello,
    In BADI BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI  method DETERMINE_EXTPO.
    you can try this.
    Structure Declaration
      DATA: ls_item_data TYPE bbps_extpo_badi.
    Moving item data to a structure
      MOVE-CORRESPONDING item_data TO ls_item_data.
    SELECT SINGLE LOGSYS FROM comm_product
                                     INTO lv_logsys
                                     WHERE PRODUCT_GUID =  ls_item_data-PRODUCT .
    If  lv_logsys = 'XXXCLNT010' "backend system
          Cancelling the enhanced classical scenario
            bbp_extpo_gl-bbpexpo  = space.
    ELSE IF lv_logsys = 'YYYCLNT010'  "backend system
          Cancelling the enhanced classical scenario
            bbp_extpo_gl-bbpexpo  = ' X'.
    ENDIF.
    Regards,
    Neelima

  • SRM with PPS = Extended Classic Scenario

    Does SRM Procurement for Public Sector (PPS) require Extended Classic Scenario? If so, could some one refer me to an official documentation that states such? Thanks.

    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/SRM/PPS-ProcurementforPublicSector-+enhancements
    PPS is only possible by ECS only.
    Muthu

Maybe you are looking for

  • Unable to play audio stream in a swf file

    Making a swf file that reacts like a button: it plays sound when you pass over it. Or should play. When the button keyframes sound options are set to "start" or "event", there is no problem, it works well. But it doesn't work if I set to "stream". My

  • Replication of Users from portal to R/3

    Hi, I would like to develop a portal functionnality that allows replication of users from portal to R/3. I know that the functionnality already exists in portal but we need to do another one because of special requirements. How could I find the java

  • Upgraded to 10.10.1. Can't use Davinci Resolve lite now. DPDecoder keeps quitting unexpectedly.

    Davinci Resolve Lite will open but will not display video. Worked fine before the upgrade to 10.10.1 I have reported to apple but I desperately need to finish my project! Can anyone help? thanks mc

  • No drivers

    HP ProBook 4540s. Windows XP Professional SP2 64bit. Tried drivers for WinXP and Win764bit - getting "This computer does not meet the minimum requirements for installing the software". Device Manager says it's Audio Device on High Definition Audio Bu

  • How to stop emails being deleted from Hotmail server

    Since the new IOS update I can't seem to choose whether I want to keep my emails in the Hotmail server or not if I delete them from my iPhone. Does anyone know how to stop that from happening?