Payment terms are overlapping in purchase order .

Dear experts
Purchase order was created , in header text terms of payment credit 30 days maintained.
but in print preview credit 30 days is overlapped with payable immediately due net in terms of payment .
in print preview only credit 30 days should appear , in vendor master payment terms tab is maintained blank.
what should be done so credit 30 days should appear in print preview.
any solution to resolve this issue.
Thanks & Regards.
Erfan

Hi,
Check the Po output program with the ABAP People.
Regards.

Similar Messages

The payment terms are not getting reflected in PO

Hi,
We are in SRM5.0 Extended Classic scenario.
We have created new payment term in ECC and transferred to SRM using BBP_UPLOAD_PAYMENT_TERMS and after tranferring it to SRM I am able to see the new payment term in table BBP_PAYTERM and BBP_PAYTERM_TEXT in SRM system.
But non of the payment terms are not reflecting into PO. We are not getting any errors while processing the PO.
Could you please suggest what may be the issue here.
Best Regards,
Siddappa

Hello Siddappa,
I am a little confused here with the scenario.
I understand that the payment terms are recenly created and replicated. So naturally they would have been updated in the relevant vendor master as well. Now has the vendor master been replicated to SRM from ECC once the payment terms were updated.
So from what you have mentioned "When we check the BBP_PD, the payment term is reflecting for the POs created after shopping cart approval."
So does this mean once the SC is approved then the PO is created and then the Terms of Payment are seen in the PO.
However "If the PO created through describe requirement, the Vendor will not assigned the PO created will go to Held status and buyer will process the order."
So does this mean since the Vendor is not mentioned the Terms of Payment is not being reflected and will happen only once the same is specified in the PO.
I have a question on whether after replicating the Payment Terms, has it been seen in any of the PO's created so far or it is always blank.
Regards
Pramod

Payment Posting with Reference to Purchase Order

Dear Experts,
I've created a Purchase Order with reference to a purchase requisition. Now I want to post MIRO with reference to this Purchase Order Number to give payment to Vendor mentioned in Purchase order. But when I going to post miro amount not coming which I mentioned in Purchase Order!!
How can I post MIRO with reference to Purchase Order Number? Is it possible?
Best Regards.
Ripon

>
riponkp wrote:
> Dear Experts,
>
> I've created a Purchase Order with reference to a purchase requisition. Now I want to post MIRO with reference to this Purchase Order Number to give payment to Vendor mentioned in Purchase order. But when I going to post miro amount not coming which I mentioned in Purchase Order!!
>
> How can I post MIRO with reference to Purchase Order Number? Is it possible?
>
> Best Regards.
> Ripon
Seems like you are doing MIRO before GR. If GR is done, it will pick the amounts, if GR is not done, the amounts are not picked. You enter the amounts manually with reference to PO.

Payment amount is more than Purchase Order Amount

Dear FI Expert,
We are getting the error "Payment amount is more than Purchase Order
Amount" w hen a single payment through one check is being made against 2
purchase orders.
System is considering only the 1st purchase order and disallowing
payment.
For e.g. 2 Purchase Orders are created w ith 100% DP condition: First
one
for USD 200000 and second one for USD 100000.
2 Dow n Payment requests are created through ME2DP against these 2
Purchase Orders.
At the time of making payment through F-48 by selecting both open items
it takes the reference of only one Purchase Order and generates the
error
"Payment amount is more than Purchase Order Amount."
Please suggest how entry w ill be made in such cases.
Thanks
Kamlesh Jangir

Hi kamlesh,
You are using EHP 4 or higher package. in this case you can use FPDP_CREATE instead of ME2DP.
You can go through Business function LOG_MMFI_P2P
https://websmp109.sap-ag.de/~form/handler?_APP=00200682500000002672&_EVENT=DISPLAY&_SCENARIO=01100035870000000122&_HIER_…
Down Payment and Down Payment Request - Purchasing (MM-PUR) - SAP Library
I hope this will be help full
Regards
Raheem

Payment terms for a particular sales order

Dear Gurus,
I want to trigger a particular payment term for a particular sales document type.
i.e., when i create a sales order with this particular sales document type the desired payment term should be copied into sales order by default. Is this possible.. please suggest.
thanks
suri

Dear Suri
As you would be aware, by default, Payment Term will flow in sale order from customer master. However, if you want to have a different payment term to flow automatically, then you have try with any of the following user exits.
User exits in the program MV45AFZZ - USEREXIT_READ_DOCUMENT
User-Exits in program MV45AFZB - USEREXIT_CHECK_VBAK
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Terms of Payment for Local and Import Purchase Order

Hello Experts,
I am SAP FICO Consultant, I am given a task of maintaining payment terms for local and import purchase order, I would highly appreciate your help in this regard. I know I can maintain payment terms via OBB8 but I am not sure that how to cover the following scenarios.
1. 100% Advance
2. 50% Advance, Balance in 07 Days (usually balance immediate with delivery is accepted but it is paid in 07 days for the record)
3. 25% Advance, Balance in 07 Days
4. 10% Advance, Balance in 07 Days
5. 30 Days Credit
6. 15 Days Credit
7. 07 Days Credit
IMPORTS
1. 100% Irrevocable LC in advance
2. 100% TT in Advance
3. 50% TT in advance & 50% before shipment.
Looking forward to hear from you.
Regards
Muhammad Yousuf Ali

Hi
<b>All the Local as well as the R/3 data gets stored in the SRM tables ->
BBP_PAYTERM (Terms of Payment, Backend-Dependent)
BBP_PAYTERM_TEXT ( Texts for Terms of Payment, Backend-Dependent)
BBP_TQ02B ( QM System)
BBP_TQ02U (Description QM system)
Also refer to Transaction SLG1 for the log created in this case.</b>
Hope this will help.
Please reward suitable points.
Regards
- Atul

Contract details i.e currency, Payment term are not copied into Call-off

Hi,
We have implemented SRM 4.0 (SP07) with extended classic scenario.
we created a PO through "Process Purchase order" & referred a line item to a contract (in the sense we are creating a call off) however when PO is ordered, system doesn't pick currency, Payment term & incoterm
maintained in contract header level into PO header but instead pick
that data from Vendor master in SRM (BBPMAININT).
Here is what we have maintained in Contract & Vendor master.
Contract No: 4800002324
Contract Currency: Euro
Payment Term: 60 days net
Inco term: CIF
Vendor master details
Vendor no: 106864
Currency: SEK
Payment term:030N
Inco term: DDP
If we perform similar test in R/3 then system behaves according to
standard.System copies currency, payment term & incoterm from contract header into PO header.
If this behaviour is possible in R/3 then why not in SRM ?
Has anybody witness simmilar problem in SRM so far..?
Any help will be awarded with full points..
BR
Bharat M

Hi
Note 970992 - Purchase order currency overwritten by partner dflt currency
The standard functionality is that the vendor master currency supersedes the SC currency as the final PO is generated for the vendor with whom the company is dealing in a particular currency.
Re: Currency USD differs from Purchase order currency EUR. Enter in PO cur
As per the old accounting system the journal books were maintained for every business partners in his currency. These entries comes to the G/L of the company in company's home currency.So it is the standard functionality that the PO will be generated in vendor master currency and not the SC currency.
Related links ->
Re: Currency Issue
How to maintain a Vendor currency in SRM
Hope this will help. Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

How to make payment terms as disable in sales order and quotation

My requirement is to make payment terms(vbkd-zterm) as display in sales order and quotation at overview ,header data and item data.
Regards
Edited by: vijay vijay on Jun 29, 2010 7:43 AM

Using user exit USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION in MV45AFZZ, use it when you are going for particular case.
Or you can go for or screen variant, use it when you are going for all cases
Hope this can assist you.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Down payment (F-48)   for Asset Purchase Order

Dear Experts,
Please guide me,   i am getting one error while doing down payment to vendor through F-48 ,    I created one asset purchase order, against purchase order making down payment that time i am getting this error message
"You cannot use this transaction type to post to this asset
Message no. AA834
Diagnosis
The transaction type entered belongs to transaction type group 15. According to the specifications for this transaction type group, posting with transactions types belonging to this group are only allowed in specific asset classes (for example, asset classes for assets under construction).
The asset to which you are posting belongs to class 401006 (chart of depreciation WCCD). You cannot post to this class using the transaction type you have entered.
Procedure
Check the asset number entered. You may want to allow posting with this transaction type group for the asset class of the asset. "
my asset is plant and machinery, any configuration is required.
as per my knowledge i checked in T.code : OAYB   transaction type groups   15 only assign AUC asset class and Capital Advance.    In account determination balance sheet accounts   there is Acquistion : Down payment   and Clearin G/lL for Down payment   g/l a/c not assign .
SAP F1 help in that field (above said) is saying that only for AUC.
Please guid me ,   What to do.
Thanks & Regards
Chandu

Hi Chandu,
Can youplease confirm the the Asset Class (the one linked to the asset you are using for carrying out down payment with T.Code F-48) has been set-up in configuration as an AUC asset class. Check on T.Code OAOA for the radio button selected for Status of AUC.
In case your Asset Class - which is Plant & Machinery - has been set up as "No AuC or summary management of AuC" i.e. has been set-up as a final asset class then you will get the error.
Solution Options:
(1) Either change the Asset Class set-up (using T.Code OAOA).
Please note - you might not be permitted/able to do this if the system already has posted transactions for this asset class.
(2) Carry out the downpayment for an AUC Asset (create an AUC Asset using T.Code AS01). Carry out F-48 for this. Later settle this AUC asset to the required/relevant final asset (using T.Codes AIAB and AIBU).
(3) Specify your Asset Class as available for carrying out DownPayment transaction. Use T.Code OAYB and for Transaction Type Group 15, include/add a new entry for your asset class.
(4) Ensure that the Account Determination linked to you asset class (check this in T.Code OAOA) has been correctly and adequately set-up for GL account determination (use T.Code AO90).
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Ruchi

Term&conditions in the purchase order smartform

Dear friends ,
I am struggling with a purchase order smartform where in the first page layout i have
1.addres
2logo
3. po header detail
4.delivery window
5. and now i have a table in the main window to dispaly the item and tax details.
6.And then a footer window.
All this is fine i did. but in the next layout
1. the remaiing part of the item details
suppose there are 7 items in first page 6 items and footer is displayed nad in the next page item no-7 and then
2.P.o value
3.terms & conditions
4. footer is display..
I am very confused...as if the item is 10 then how i will manage the positions of the terms & conditions and footer windows.
pls help ....
on how to design for the second page..i am not well versed with new page-counters..may be that is stopping me ..
pls advice...
thanks.

Hi Simraan,
I guess u just want the term's and condition window to be printed only once after the all the items in main window are printed.
If this is the issue,
then solution is as follows------>>>>>>>
As main window length is variable....it extends according to the no. of table entries can extend to number of pages.
if u want to make anything print just after the complete print out of table in main window then u can declare a TABLE LINE inside the footer of the table and go to Condition tab of the Table line in smartform there in bottom there would be an event ONLY AT PARAGRAPH END, Select this even, once u select this event and inside the corresponding table line if u declare ur terms and conditions then this table line would be printed just Once in ur smartform just after the Complete print of ur table in Main Window.
Hope this resolves ur issue.
Regards,
Akash Rana

Locking Payment Terms field on OM Sales Order

Hi,
Our users are entering sales order using OM responsibility. We have customers that have a payment term of COD. Within a sales order, when one of these customers is selected and COD is returned to the payment terms field, the user can still change it. We would like to lock the payment terms field when a payment term of COD is returned and not allow it to be updated. If the payment term is not COD, we would allow the user to change it if needed. Can we possibility do this using forms personalization?
Thanks for the help

Dear MoazzaM,
I know that payment term is available in 3 screens. My question is that if I make the field invisible in any of the screen then it should at least perform for that particular screen. Because I tried the same with Std TV BUS2032 and it worked.
Or is it that If apply the changes for all the screens it would take effect in case of Z transaction variant?
But I am surprised why the same is not getting called when I use a Z transaction variant. Also please note that if I refer to the Std TV BUS2032 and make a copy of the same I am still not able to use it as the screens called there are already used at many places in standard SAP?
Please suggest.
Regards,
Anirban

Production order overlapping with purchase orders for outside process

I set up the overlap option in a router so we can send 50 pieces (total order quantity is 200) of material ahead to an outside heat treat operation. When we try to create the purchase order for the 50 to be sent out for heat treat two problems occur.
1. The quatity in the purchase order is for the entire order of 200, not 50.
2. We get a message "Date /23/2010 period D is not valid.
We currently do not use the functionality of splits and overlaps so if anyone can help or guide me to a good resource I would appreciate it.
Regards.
Gail
Edited by: Gail Weeks on Nov 12, 2010 4:19 PM
If anyone could help with this question I'd appreciate it. Thanks.

Gail:
the next operation would be an external operation in your order ? That is, has some external Operation Control Key?
Then the PurReq for this operation is created at creation or release of the production order by the total operation quantity. Ovelapping allows you to reduce some total time in order, but I don think that can be applied for the purpose you describe. Let us know more details about your requirement.
Regards

How to make "payment terms" not modifiable in sales order

Hello every 1,
please help, i want to know:
how to make "payment terms" not modifiable in a sales order , as we know it comes directly from CMR and client wants "PAYMENT TERMS" to be not modifiable.
Look forward for your response.
Thanks in Advance,
Deepak

You need to use SHD0 or userexit chnages, like always determine from customer master, if user changes, give message like not modifiable or ask abaper to make non modifable field

Return Purchase Order (MVT #161) Sales Area Determination on Purchase Order

Hi,
I am working on return purchase order (Purchase order with return check box ON at item level) and creating outbound delivery with VL10B and doing PGI to vendor.
Can someone help to figure out how sales area (sales org/distribution channel/Division) gets determine on purchase order item level "Shipping" tab ?
In other word, as shown below for return PO, I have sales area 1180/50/01. I want to determine different sales area.
Thanks.
Regards,
Ravi.

However, you can enhance the system to use multiple sales areas for return by using retail sales area. The below notes give more details:
https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/sno/ui_entry/entry.htm?param=69765F6D6F64653D3030312669765F7361…
https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/sno/ui_entry/entry.htm?param=69765F6D6F64653D3030312669765F7361…

Down Payment Request F-47 and Purchase Order reference

When creating a Down Payment Request using F-47, is there a way to reference to a Purchase Order number without indicating a line item? It is my client's business practice to make a down payment for the whole PO, not just for a particular line item. Is there a configuration setting that needs to be done to cater to this requirement?
Thanks.

It all depends on how you want to use it to clear invoices down.
You could put the PO number in the text line of the down payment.
You do not need to put in the line item so it meets one of their requirements.
The problem then comes how is that PO number used to clear the actual invoices.
If it is acceptable to clear manually this can be done, however it all depends on how many line items a Vendor will have open at a time for the same PO. If scheduled Agreements were used, you may find that there could be 1000 or so open items at a single time.
Hope this helps in some way, in essecence you need to be creative.
Please award points if useful.

Payment terms are overlapping in purchase order .

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for