Payment terms not working as expected

I have a requirement for to create one payment terms for 9 days. i have completed configuration, but when we have done testing it was pulling 10th days insteady of 9th day like one day after. can anybody help us whre we have done wrong?

Hi Reddy...
Reduce one day.. System is calculating from today..
I think you are calculating from tomorrow..
Good Luck!
Lucid-Mind...

Similar Messages

Payment terms- Ex works

payment terms- Ex works means wat
pls giv the list of payment terms and when we hav use each

Ex Works etc.. are not payment terms but they are "Incoterms"
Some of the common Incoterms are :
CFR   Costs and freight (Not borned by the buyer)
CIF   Costs, insurance & freight (Not borned by the buyer)
CIP   Carriage and insurance paid to
CPT   Carriage paid to
DAF   Delivered at frontier
DDP   Delivered Duty Paid(no charges borned by the buyer)
DDU   Delivered Duty Unpaid
DEQ   Delivered ex quay (duty paid)
DES   Delivered ex ship
EXW   Ex Works(All charges borned by the buyer)
FAS   Free Alongside Ship
FCA   Free Carrier
FH    Free house
FOB   Free on board
Incoterms are Commonly-used trading terms that comply with the standards established by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC).
Reward if helps you
Rgds
Edited by: Sudeep Mundada on Mar 12, 2008 9:38 AM

Payment term not appearing in PO print out

Hello all,
We have one PO where Payment term is not appearing in PO print out. I have checked other POs of the same type where its appearing in print out. In PO header payment term is maintained. Does this flow from Vendor mastre?
Regards

Hi,
Is this payment term is new one !
Yes, payment term should flow from vendor master to PO.
Now as payment term not printed in PO print, just check with your PO output type & related FORM or PDF/SmartForm in it for application EF in NACE t.code. Also check SmartForm in t.code: SMARTFORMS . Or if FORM check in t.code:SE71 / SE73 the SapScript & see inclusion of all payment term in it with help of with ABAP consultant.
Regards,
Biju K

How to make "payment terms" not modifiable in sales order

Hello every 1,
please help, i want to know:
how to make "payment terms" not modifiable in a sales order , as we know it comes directly from CMR and client wants "PAYMENT TERMS" to be not modifiable.
Look forward for your response.
Thanks in Advance,
Deepak

You need to use SHD0 or userexit chnages, like always determine from customer master, if user changes, give message like not modifiable or ask abaper to make non modifable field

Silverlight 5 binding on a property with logic in its setter does not work as expected when debug is attached

My problem is pretty easy to reproduce.
I created a project from scratch with a view model.
As you can see in the setter of "Age" property I have a simple logic.
public class MainViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
private int age;
public int Age
get
return age;
set
/*Age has to be over 18* - a simple condition in the setter*/
age = value;
if(age <= 18)
age = 18;
OnPropertyChanged("Age");
public MainViewModel(int age)
this.Age = age;
private void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
if (this.PropertyChanged != null)
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
In the MainPage.xaml
<Grid x:Name="LayoutRoot" Background="White">
<TextBox
Text="{Binding Path=Age, Mode=TwoWay}"
HorizontalAlignment="Left"
Width="100"
Height="25"/>
<TextBlock
Text="{Binding Path=Age, Mode=OneWay}"
HorizontalAlignment="Right"
Width="100"
Height="25"/>
</Grid>
And MainPage.xaml.cs I simply instantiate the view model and set it as a DataContext.
public partial class MainPage : UserControl
private MainViewModel mvm;
public MainPage()
InitializeComponent();
mvm = new MainViewModel(20);
this.DataContext = mvm;
I expect that this code will limit set the Age to 18 if the value entered in the TextBox is lower than 18.
Scenario: Insert into TextBox the value "5" and press tab (for the binding the take effect, TextBox needs to lose the focus)
Case 1: Debugger is attached =>
TextBox value will be "5" and TextBlock value will be "18" as expected. - WRONG
Case 2: Debugger is NOT attached =>
TextBox value will be "18" and TextBlock value will be "18" - CORRECT
It seems that when debugger is attached the binding does not work as expected on the object that triggered the update of the property value. This happens only if the property to which we are binding has some logic into the setter or getter.
Has something changed in SL5 and logic in setters is not allowed anymore?
Configuration:
VisualStudio 2010 SP1
SL 5 Tools 5.1.30214.0
SL5 sdk 5.0.61118.0
IE 10
Thanks!

Inputting the value and changing it straight away is relatively rare.
Very few people are now using Silverlight because it's kind of deprecated...
This is why nobody has reported this.
I certainly never noticed this problem and I have a number of live Silverlight systems out there.
Some of which are huge.
If you want a "fix":
private void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
if (this.PropertyChanged != null)
//PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
Storyboard sb = new Storyboard();
sb.Duration = new Duration(new TimeSpan(0, 0, 0, 0, 100));
sb.Completed += delegate
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
sb.Begin();
The fact this works is interesting because (I think ) it means the textbox can't be updated at the point the propertychanged is raised.
Please don't forget to upvote posts which you like and mark those which answer your question.
My latest Technet article - Dynamic XAML

Subtraction of two key figures normalized to result not working as expected

Hello SAP Community!
I am having problems with getting the right result from a subtraction of two KFs which are "normalized to results" which means the KFs really have values expressed as percentages. The substraction that should be performed is of two percentages (e.g.: 87.298% - 85.527% = 1.77%) but my report prints out the result as "number of units" instead (e.g.: 87.298% - 85.527% = 71,514.00 EA). The two normalized KFs actually "point" to two stock KFs, hence the "number of units".
In order to explain the problem I am facing please analyze below text:
1) Let's assume I have below data:
LOAD MONTH PLANT    MATERIAL HORIZON MONTH     FORECAST UNITS
200805         PLANT-A MAT-1            200805         510,235.00
200805         PLANT-B MAT-1           200805          74,240.00
200805         PLANT-A MAT-1           200806         438,721.00
200805         PLANT-B MAT-1           200806          74,240.00
200805         PLANT-A MAT-1           200807         356,981.00
200805         PLANT-B MAT-1           200807          74,240.00
200806         PLANT-A MAT-1           200805               0.00
200806         PLANT-B MAT-1           200805               0.00
200806         PLANT-A MAT-1           200806         510,235.00
200806         PLANT-B MAT-1           200806          74,240.00
200806         PLANT-A MAT-1           200807         438,721.00
200806         PLANT-B MAT-1           200807          74,240.00
2) Then, assume I have a comparison report, restricted by load month for two months May and June 2008 (filter restricted by two month variables) with FORECAST units spread accross columns for whole horizon (two months also in this case).
Material Plant                                 2008/06     2008/07
===================================================================
MAT1      PLANT-A
                   Base Units (May 2008)        438,721.00 356,981.00
                   Comparison Units (June 2008) 510,235.00 438,721.00
          PLANT-B
                   Base Units (May 2008)         74,240.00   74,240.00
                   Comparison Units (June 2008) 74,240.00   74,240.00
          TOTALS   Base Units                   512,961.00 431,221.00
                   Comparison Units             584,475.00 512,961.00
3) Now, let's suppose we want to know the proportions (%) of Base vs Comparison units, so
we normalize forecats to results an we get the below report:
Material Plant                                 2008/06     2008/07
===================================================================
MAT1      PLANT-A
                   Base Units (May 2008)        438,721.00 356,981.00
                   Base Units % (May 2008)      85.527%     85.527%
                   Comparison Units (June 2008) 510,235.00 438,721.00
                   Comparison Units %(Jun 2008) 87.298%     82.784%
          PLANT-B
                   Base Units (May 2008)         74,240.00   74,240.00
                   Base Units % (May 2008)       14.473%     15.702%
                   Comparison Units (June 2008) 74,240.00   74,240.00
                   Comparison Units %(Jun 2008) 12.702%     17.216%
          TOTALS   Base Units                   512,961.00 431,221.00
                   Comparison Units             584,475.00 512,961.00
4) Finally, let's suppose we want to know the deltas (differences) of Base vs Comparison
units, for both number of units and %. The report now look as below:
Material Plant                                 2008/06     2008/07
===================================================================
MAT1      PLANT-A
                   Base Units (May 2008)        438,721.00 356,981.00
                   Base Units % (May 2008)      85.527%     85.527%
                   Comparison Units (June 2008) 510,235.00 438,721.00
                   Comparison Units %(Jun 2008) 87.298%     82.784%
                   Delta base vs. comp. units % 1.77%       2.74%
                   Delta base vs. comp. units    71,514.00 81,740.00
          PLANT-B
                   Base Units (May 2008)         74,240.00   74,240.00
                   Base Units % (May 2008)       14.473%     15.702%
                   Comparison Units (June 2008) 74,240.00   74,240.00
                   Comparison Units %(Jun 2008) 12.702%     17.216%
                   Delta base vs. comp. units % -1.77%      -2.74%
                   Delta base vs. comp. units         0.00        0.00
          TOTALS   Base Units                   512,961.00 431,221.00
                   Comparison Units             584,475.00 512,961.00
5) PROBLEM:
In my report, the "Delta base vs. comp. units %" is not working as expected and
calculates number of units just as "Delta base vs. comp. units" does instead of calculating the % difference.
So my report looks as follows:
Material Plant                                 2008/06     2008/07
===================================================================
MAT1      PLANT-A
                   Base Units (May 2008)        438,721.00 356,981.00
                   Base Units % (May 2008)      85.527%     85.527%
                   Comparison Units (June 2008) 510,235.00 438,721.00
                   Comparison Units %(Jun 2008) 87.298%     82.784%
                   Delta base vs. comp. units % 71,514.00 81,740.00 <<<WRONG!!
                   Delta base vs. comp. units    71,514.00 81,740.00
          PLANT-B
                   Base Units (May 2008)         74,240.00   74,240.00
                   Base Units % (May 2008)       14.473%     15.702%
                   Comparison Units (June 2008) 74,240.00   74,240.00
                   Comparison Units %(Jun 2008) 12.702%     17.216%
                   Delta base vs. comp. units %       0.00        0.00
                   Delta base vs. comp. units         0.00        0.00
          TOTALS   Base Units                   512,961.00 431,221.00
                   Comparison Units             584,475.00 512,961.00
The formulas are:
a) Delta base vs. comp. units %
Delta base vs. comp. units % = Comparison Units % - Base Units %
b) Delta base vs. comp. units
Delta base vs. comp. units = Comparison Units - Base Units
The KFs
- Comparison Units %
- Base Units %
Are RESTRICTED key figures (restricted to Base and comparison month variables) which
are setup as:
1) Calculate Result As: Summation of Rounded Values
2) Calculate Single Value as: Normalization of result
3) Calculate Along the Rows
The KFs
- Delta base vs. comp. units %
- Delta base vs. comp. units
are FORMULAS setup to:
1) Calculate Result As: Nothing defined
2) Calculate Single Value as: Nothing defined
3) Calculate Along the Rows: user default direction (grayed out)
Thanks for the time taken to read in detail all of this. Long text but necessary to understand what the problem is.
Any help is highly appreciated.
Thank you.
Mario

Hi,
The subraction will be carried out before doing the normalization of your KF's. So, it is displaying "number of units". Create a calculated keyfigure and subtract the KF's and in the properties of this calculated keyfigure, change the enhancement as "After Aggregation".
I hope this will solve your issue.
Regards,
S P.

Payment terms not exist in contract

Dear SAP experts,
We are in SRM 7 and ECC 6 and using extended scenario. For payment terms we download payment terms from ECC by using program BBP_UPLOAD_PAYMENT_TERMS and entries created in table BBP_PAYTERM. When we create PO we can use this payment terms from ECC. However the odd thing happen when we create contract, we can see the paymet terms as possible selection, but if we select it we got error 'Payment term not exist in target system'. However if we create payment terms directly in SRM (using config payment conditions), then we can choose the payment term from SRM.
But this is not making any sense as why do we need to have duplicate payment terms one coming from ECC and the other coming from SRM. Do I miss something in here? (Note that in RFx response, vendor can NOT choose payment terms locally in SRM as they can ONLY see the one coming from ECC).
Best regards,
John

Hi John,
Please implement the following note & retest this issue:
1609905 Validation for local contracts contains errors
Kind Regards,
Edel.

Events in SubVi not working as expected

Hi, I am reposting this question as my previous one didn't resulted in any satisfactory conclusion.
I have attached my Vi's which are not working as expected. If I remove ONE subVi and its associated 3 controls and two indicators, the other one works just fine, but when I add two SUB Vis, it goes messy. I am trying to learn this way, I am sure it can be done many other ways, but please help me finding out the problem doing it this way as in my final MainVi, I would like to use 8 such sub Vis. Thanks.
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
Main.vi ‏11 KB
SubVi.vi ‏12 KB
SubVi_2.vi ‏15 KB

Your main problem is DATA FLOW. A loop cannot iterate until EVERYTHING in it has completed. So, as you have it, you have to have both event structures execture before you can go back to look for the next event. So if you insist on having these subVIs, they need to be in seperate loops.
BTW, you can get away with a single subVI. Go into the VI properties and make it reentrant (preallocated clone). Then each call of your subVI will have its own memory space. A lot easier to maintain that way.
And I know you said you didn't want alternatives, but here's how you can do it all with a single event structure in your main loop.
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
Attachments:
Main_MODTR.vi ‏10 KB

AFS ARUN Size Substitution Not Working As Expected

Hi All,
I need help with this. If any one of you have worked with AFS ARUN size substitution, kindly provide me with some details on how can I set it up. I am specially interested in setting up size substitution with two-dimensional grids.
I have setup some examples but it does not work as expected.
Here is a small example:
Say I have a size 28/30, 28/32 .........29/30....
What I want to achieve is that during ARUN if there is a shortage of stock in 28/30 then the remaining requirement qty should be confirmed from size 28/32.
with my setup after 28/30 it goes into looking for stock in 29/30, which is what I do not want.
Any inputs will be really appreciated.
Thanks!!

srdfrn wrote:
Hi YOS,
I tried importing a PCX image into CVI 2010 and then sizing the image to the control and didn't see the behavior you have been describing. Would you mind posting an example (alongside an image file) that demonstrates this?
Also, one thing I noticed is that PCX images appear to be quite dated. Could upgrading them to a JPEG or PNG format be an option for you?
Thanks,
Stephanie R.
National Instruments
Stephanie, thanks for the reply.
I am very sorry to state that I made a mistake.
VAL_SIZE_TO_IMAGE indeed works.
What fails to work is VAL_SIZE_TO_PICTURE. (Second option in Fit Mode attribute in control editing panel)
I tried with JPEG and it's the same.
I am attaching an example.(Load_Image.c & ONEP_3Trow_POS1.JPG)
A panel with two picture rings.
- SW_1 remains at the intended size and the loaded picture is not clear.
- SW_2 will fit to picture size and looks OK.
Appreciate your support,
YOSsi Seter
Attachments:
Load_Image.c ‏2 KB
ONEP_3Trow_POS1.JPG ‏4 KB

Valuation Basis for Different Payment (BWGRL) not working in 2010

Hi
We have a commission wagetype which we entered in IT 2010 in Number/Unit field.
Since we don't have premium id available, we used "Valuation Basis for Different Payment (BWGRL)" to enter the RATE.
This RATE is not working during our payroll run, however when we are using the wagetype with premium ID it is working fine.
My question is- What could be the reason that the Valuation Basis for different payment is not working ?
I checked the wagetype in V_512W_B table and it has the following configuration-
Current wage type
Valuation Basis = BLANK
Statement/WT = BLANK
%Rate = 100
1st derived wage type
Valuation Basis = BLANK
Statement/WT = BLANK
%Rate = BLANK
2nd derived wage type
Valuation Basis = BLANK
Statement/WT = BLANK
%Rate = BLANK
Would appreciate if the the fix could be provided.
Saurabh Garg

Hello,
I think in your case for commision wagetype you need to modify rule $930 to process the override rate from Infotype 2010 BWGRL field in case you are using the US standard schema.
The valuation basis table V_512W_D and rule $930 together will determine the valuation basis.
The default valuation basis comes from table V_512W_D.In case you want to override the valuation basis rate defined in this table,you need to maintain override rate in It2010 and accordingly have the logic defined in rule $930 for that particular wagetype .
Following is the sample rule definition for a similar scenario.
****(commision wagetype)
NUM= ANZHL Set
RTE= BWGRL Set
RTE?0      Comparison
      MULTI NRA Multipl.amt/no/rate
      SETIN X=NX Set variable split
      ADDWT *    OT   Output table
    =
      VALBS0     Eval.0.WT in 512W
      MULTI NRA Multipl.amt/no/rate
      SETIN X=NX Set variable split
      ADDWT *    OT   Output table
Regards,
Malathi V.

Notification "Launch the app and go to the library" not working as expected

Hello,
we are sending notification "Launch the app and go to the library" - but it's not working as expected, it's still just launching app with last open folio.
Whats wrong there? Do we need v30 app? We have V29, but this is not mentioned in documentation.
Thanks
Martin

Ah.
Ok, now it's clear.
Anyway i would appreciate possibility to force viewer to switch to library view after new issue is detected, even without notification. Quite often requested feature - "there is new cover in Newsstand, but customer don't know how to download new publication easily".
Martin

DB Adapter polling as singleton process is not working as expected

Am using poller DB adapater to control the transaction per seconds to the downstream system and i want this poller process as singleton (One instance should be in running state at a time).
As suggested in oracle documents , below is the parameters configured in composite.xml file.
<service name="polling_Mange_Alert_Events"
ui:wsdlLocation="polling_Mange_Alert_Events.wsdl">
<interface.wsdl interface="http://xmlns.oracle.com/pcbpel/adapter/db/Application1/int_app_manageAlerts/polling_Mange_Alert_Events#wsdl.interface(polling_Mange_Alert_Events_ptt)"/>
<binding.jca config="polling_Mange_Alert_Events_db.jca">
<property name="singleton">true</property>
</binding.jca>
<property name="jca.retry.count" type="xs:int" many="false" override="may">2147483647</property>
<property name="jca.retry.interval" type="xs:int" many="false"
override="may">1</property>
<property name="jca.retry.backoff" type="xs:int" many="false"
override="may">2</property>
<property name="jca.retry.maxInterval" type="xs:string" many="false"
override="may">120</property>
</service>
Below is the JCA file parameters configured :
<adapter-config name="polling_Mange_Alert_Events" adapter="Database Adapter" wsdlLocation="polling_Mange_Alert_Events.wsdl" xmlns="http://platform.integration.oracle/blocks/adapter/fw/metadata">
<connection-factory location="eis/DB/vff-int-fus" UIConnectionName="PT_APPINFRA" adapterRef=""/>
<endpoint-activation portType="polling_Mange_Alert_Events_ptt" operation="receive">
    <activation-spec className="oracle.tip.adapter.db.DBActivationSpec">
      <property name="DescriptorName" value="polling_Mange_Alert_Events.ManageAlertEvents"/>
      <property name="QueryName" value="polling_Mange_Alert_EventsSelect"/>
      <property name="MappingsMetaDataURL" value="polling_Mange_Alert_Events-or-mappings.xml"/>
      <property name="PollingStrategy" value="LogicalDeletePollingStrategy"/>
      <property name="MarkReadColumn" value="TRANSACTION_STATUS"/>
      <property name="MarkReadValue" value="Processing"/>
      <property name="PollingInterval" value="10"/>
      <property name="MaxRaiseSize" value="5"/>
      <property name="MaxTransactionSize" value="5"/>
      <property name="NumberOfThreads" value="1"/>
      <property name="ReturnSingleResultSet" value="false"/>
      <property name="MarkUnreadValue" value="Pending"/>
    </activation-spec>
</endpoint-activation>
</adapter-config>
This poller process is running on clustered environment (2 soa nodes) and it is not working as expected as singleton process.
Please advise to solve this issue ?

Hi,
1.Set Singleton property outside   <binding.jca> like this:
<binding.jca config="polling_Mange_Alert_Events_db.jca"/>
<property name="singleton">true</property>
<property name="jca.retry.count" type="xs:int" many="false" override="may">2147483647</property>
<property name="jca.retry.interval" type="xs:int" many="false"
2.Also you can try setting these values in jca file:
<property name="RowsPerPollingInterval" value="100"/>
<property name="MaxTransactionSize" value="100"/>
3. try to increase the polling interval time.
Regards,
Anshul

TCP Window sizing not working as expected for Windows server 2008 R2 SP1

Hi ,
TCP window size is not working as expected. It is varying . Aplied the hotfix suggested by Microsoft and set the multipliccation factor as 1.The window size is not getting auto tuned based on the client machine. The data transfer rate is getting degraded.
Please help.
Thanks,
Pro1962

Hi,
I think window auto-tuning is enabled.
You can disable it by running the following commend.
netsh interface tcp set global autotuninglevel=disabled
Hope this helps.

Container-Managed Transaction Type Attributes not working as expected

I am having a problem with the container-managed transactions not working as expected. I have 2 methods that work as follows:
MethodA{
for(a lot)
call MethodB;
@Transaction Type = RequiresNew
MethodB{
EntityManager Persist to database
I want the code in MethodB to be committed to the database when methodB returns. The problem is that I am running out of memory and MethodA is failing. When methodA fails after numerous calls to MethodB nothing is persisted to the database.
It is my understanding that when using requires new transactions that a new transaction is started for each call to the method and ends when the method returns while the calling method transaction is suspended.
How am I misunderstanding the requiresNew transaction attribute. What can I do to make a batch insert into my database that will not run out of memory (commit when a methodB returns)?
Thanks in advance.

The problem is that EJB invocation semantics for security, container-managed transactions, etc.
only apply when an invocation is made through an EJB reference. In your case, you are directly
invoking the implementation method from within the bean. The EJB container has no idea that's
happening. It's no different than invoking a utility method.
In order to get the behavior you'd like, you need to retrieve a reference to your own bean and invoke
through that. You can use SessionContext.getBusinessObject() to get the EJB reference for the
business interface through which the method in question is exposed.
--ken

Namespaces not working as expected

Hi, I've got problems with namespaces not working as expected. When I isolate a process into a new network and mount namespace, a newly mounted file system will be visible to all processes.
Steps to reproduce:
$ sudo unshare -mn bash
bash# mount -t sysfs sysfs /sys
bash# exit
$ cat /proc/mounts
Result:
/proc/mounts will contain a new line for sysfs. This means the /sys/fs/cgroups directory will appear to be empty as the new sysfs is mounted over the old However you can undo it by
sudo umount /sys
Expected result:
The /sys directory will only be new inside the bash process started using unshare and not anymore once you exit bash.
Did I understand something wrong? Or might this be a bug in the kernel?
Note that when using
unshare -m bash
without isolating the network namespace it will refuse to mount sysfs as it is already mounted or busy. Strange.

Hello, because sysfs is shared, see unshare(1) for more details.

Payment terms not working as expected

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for