PB30 authorisation issue

Hi all,
I am very new to HR- ABAP.
I have a requirement that in PB30 there is one infotype 9024 which is custom infotype, if i select 9024 infotype and pressing the display or create it will take me into a screen 9024.
In that screen there is one tabstrip and two tabs called Attributes and Score.
I want to give authorisation to all the users for Attributes tab and for some users i have to give the authorisation to Score tab.
Basis people has given the authorisation object to me.
How would i write this authorisation logic .
can anybody help me inthis regard.
Thanks,
JKR.

Hi
Thanks for the update
They are executing query in portal isnt?
They are executing report in WEB BEx Analyzer
First check the object is authorization relevant or not. you can check this in RSA1.
Yes the objects is Authorisation Relevant
And check the authorizations to their info providers, info cubes for the object.
How can i check this

Similar Messages

XI System Authorisation Issue

Dear XI Experts ,
I am not able to test my scenarios in the Dev box.They are failing when I check them at the adapter engine.
The error which I am getting is as follows :
File_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System failed, due to: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.RecoverableException: Received HTTP response code 401 : Unauthorized.
This looks to me as it has some authorisation issue. Can you people provide some details on this .
Thanks
Amit

Hi Amit,
Please check the following urls.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/d0d9a978-5f59-2a10-1cae-d4cf0c92a0f2?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/bd5950ff-0701-0010-a5bc-86d45fd52283?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
Thanks
Ravi

Ksb2 transaction ( Display commitment item for CC )authorisation issue

In my project some of the user are facing problem to display for the T code KSb2 ( Commitment Item report for cost center ).
Mesage : No authorisation to display valuation view 1 for controlling Area .
User has in her authorisation profile to display valuation view 0 ie legal valuation .
In KSB1 transaction one option comes in Extras -> Actual valuation where the user can select 0 or 1 .
But in Ksb2 this option is greyed out .
So system is reading valuation view 1 & I am not able to understand from which settings ?
Need help on this .Do we mention any where in the variant relating to Valuation View ?
Thanks

Hi,
I think try to check with your Basis person. Do /nSU53 in KSB2 to see if any authorisation issue is involved.
Regards
Divraj

Authorisation issue - the report is running and

Hello friends,
Need some help .
There is one salary report , which user is not able to see the data . It is running and running for 1/2 hours
and finally the message coming that action is cancelled.
I have checked the data flow and everything seems correct .
It seems the problem with user authorisation .
How could i check the User id authorisation for this specific salary report. ?
I am not aware about the more thing in authorisation.
Thanks in advance.
Regards

I feel this is not authorisation issue. But i am not sure.
Any way.
Run that report in tcode RSSMQ with that particular user id and try to check SU53 Tcode in another window for that user id immediatly after getting error message while running the report
RSSMQ - Runs report with other user ids
SU53 - gives information on authorisation problems if any (It is authorisation Trance)
Thanks.
Edited by: BI Dev on Jan 3, 2008 5:29 PM

Authorisation issue . - Report is running and running

Hello , By mistanly i resolved the last thread .
Yes , i have excuted the report by using RSSMQ and with the user id . I found the below messge .
Full Authorisation is requiered for this selection option .
A displayed hierachy requires option .
Could you please let me know , how i can solve this issue now .?
Thanks in advance.
Any way.
Run that report in tcode RSSMQ with that particular user id and try to check SU53 Tcode in another window for that user id immediatly after getting error message while running the report
RSSMQ - Runs report with other user ids
SU53 - gives information on authorisation problems if any (It is authorisation Trance)
Thanks.
Edited by: BI Dev on Jan 3, 2008 5:29 PM

I feel this is not authorisation issue. But i am not sure.
Any way.
Run that report in tcode RSSMQ with that particular user id and try to check SU53 Tcode in another window for that user id immediatly after getting error message while running the report
RSSMQ - Runs report with other user ids
SU53 - gives information on authorisation problems if any (It is authorisation Trance)
Thanks.
Edited by: BI Dev on Jan 3, 2008 5:29 PM

Authorisation issue regarding BEX Broadcaster

Hi all
Does anyone know why I maybe getting an authorisation issue attempting to broadcast a pdf report via the Bex broadcast tool?
The recipient user has all the relevant authorisations and roles attached, and when this report is previewed in Bex Report Designer, the report runs fine showing all the data for the report, However when the report is scheduled via the Bex broadcaster, the broadcast fails. RSRD_LOG shows the following message
Java communication error: RFC destination NOT_CONFIGURED does not exist.
Message no. RSBOLAP017
And in T-code sm21, I get the following error
X MESSAGE BRAIN 299: SAPLRSEC_CHECKS
RSEC_GET_AUTH_HIER_FOR_USER:NOHIE
This indicates that there is an authorisation error with my user, however as mentioned earlier all the authorisation objects and roles seem correct as the report runs fine as I can preview in bex report designer with no authorisation problems at all.
I have also executed the report in T-code RSECADMIN this also shows no errors in the error log and the report runs fine here too.
Please can anyone advise?
Thanks
Forhad

Hi Forhad,
I'm not sure if the error is related to the communication between the Java and the BW or if it's a problem with the authorization.
Are you using a customer exit or an authorization variable in your query/bookmark?
Check if by chance your query have an hirarchy assigned to a characteristic, then, check the user's authorization and check whether you have enough authorization for the hierarchy.
I'm unsure, but maybe note 916090 can help you.
I hope it helps.
Regards,
Daniel

MM02 Authorisations Issue

Hi guys,
Hoping you can assist me with an authorisations issue I am facing.
End-users are using a Z bespoke material upload program. In order to run the program they need full authorisations to all views in MM02 as the upload program uses this transaction in a BDC Call. However they currently have restrictions on certain views in MM02.
I need to find a way that allows them to run the program but prevents them from getting full access to all the views in MM02.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Philip Johannesen

Hi guys,
thanks for your feedback.
Alex - yes you are right submitting it to a background job via a batch user wouldn't be suitable. As there are restrictions against the Users ID on which materials they copy to certain plants.
The views are there to prevent them from changing data. However they can view the data in display mode.
Do you know where I could get more detail on setting up approriate change control measures as you suggested?
Many Thanks,
Philip Johannesen

Authorisation issue in SRM 7.0

Dear Experts,
We are configuring Extended Classic Scenario in SRM 7.0.
I have 2 Purchasing groups and each having one Purchaser.
Each Purchasing group is responsible for 1 Product category.
When I create and approve shoping cart I need to restrict the processing of PO to the relavent Purchaser.
I have created 2 ZROLE in SRM by coping the standard Operational purchaser role with the modified Authorisation objects BBP_PGRP & BBP_PURORG and assigned it to the corresponding user.
For the purchasers I have asssigned the standard Operational Purchaser role in Portal.
When I log in as Purchaser still I can see and modify the PO's belonging to the both Purchasing group.
Can any one give me a suggestion how to over come this issue.
Regards,
B.N.Karthikeyan.

Hi,
In the PPOMA_BBP -Change attributes . Go to the extended attributes in the give exact product category for the purchaser
so that he can shop only that product category he cannot modify other category
Regards
Ganesh

Authorisation issue

Hi
I recently purchased a new PC running windows 8.
When I went to authorise my new PC in iTunes, I put in my correct apple ID and password but kept getting the same error message "We could not complete your iTunes store request. The network connection was reset.Make sure your network connection is active and try again."
Now my network connection is fine and it even allows me to sign in to the Apple store with my current ID and even download music on the new PC once I re-verified my CC details etc, I just can't access my existing music library etc,.
It just doesn't allow me to add/authorise this second PC, I only have one other PC currently authorised so its nothing to do with exceeding 5 authorisation or my network connection. I've been trying this over a period of a week so its not a one off Apple issue like on a Sunday when they are busy. Is there anyhting with windows 8 I'm missing here that I should know about?
Guys I need your help for a solution?

Hey Finny2013,
Thanks for the question. The following articles may help you to resolve this issue:
iTunes: Missing folder or incorrect permissions may prevent authorization
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1277
Additionally, you may want to check for third-party security software or firewalls that are interfering with your connection to the iTunes Store:
iTunes: Troubleshooting security software issues
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3125
Thanks,
Matt M.

Authorisation issues in ECC6.0

I am getting an authorisation error for some transaction. I never faced any such issues before the upgrade. Pls resolve
Thanks
Manoj

Hi,
You would need to perform a security upgrade after your upgrade to ECC6.0. There are differences in the transaction codes from 4.7 and ECC 6.0 Untill you perform the upgrade, you will face such issues.
Please follow SAP handbook second edition by Jose Hernandez for procedure of upgrade.
If you have performed the security upgrade, then please specify the when are you getting such issues.
Regards,
Imran

Authorisation Issue ASA 5510 8.0(2)

Hi
I have a strange issue that when authorisation commands are sent from ASA to ACS, thet are sent to ACS with a source address of 0.0.0.0 rather than IP address of device accessing the ASA or that is how ACS is viewing it.
Authentication on device is OK.
We are not having this issue with other devices but this is only device we have on 8.0(2), we have devices on newer and older IOS, unless I am missing something on config but all looks OK.
Any help/thought apprecated.

i wish it was that simple.
the permissions have not changed at all on the network shares. i can log in to the network locally and have no issues whatsoever accessing the very same shares I am trying to access through the webvpn.

Authorisation issue:Using RRI..

Hi Experts,
I have an issue here as described below:
I have created one End user role to give authorisations to end users.
when testing(by assigning this role to test user id),I can able execute queries using Bex Analyser.But when trying to go to see some other report which is connected to the base report through RRI(via menu in query --> goto <display line-item>),I am unable to see the data.
Its ending up with the error:You do not have sufficient authorization.
Could some one please suggest resolution for this issue.
Quick help will be highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards
Nag

Hi
Please chec RRI query having authorization variables or not if yes check RSECADMIN for values assigned for those objects.
Go to RSECADMIN and switch on the Trace with log so that it will display the exact result.
Regards
Jagadeesh

Authorisation Issue SRM 7.0

Dear Experts,
We are configuring Extended Classic Scenario in SRM 7.0.
I have 2 Purchasing groups and each having one Purchaser.
Each Purchasing group is responsible for 1 Product category.
When I create and approve shoping cart I need to restrict the processing of PO to the relavent Purchaser.
I have created 2 ZROLE in SRM by coping the standard Operational purchaser role with the modified Authorisation objects BBP_PGRP & BBP_PURORG and assigned it to the corresponding user.
For the purchasers I have asssigned the standard Operational Purchaser role in Portal.
When I log in as Purchaser still I can see and modify the PO's belonging to the both Purchasing group.
Can any one give me a suggestion how to over come this issue.
Regards,
B.N.Karthikeyan.

Hello,
This might help.
Note 1334253 - Authorization Check missing in Sourcing Cockpit
Note 1335797 - Authority Check on Process Type missing in Sourcing Cockpit
Note 1242643 - Authorized Purchase Group and organisation in POWL
Thanks
Ashutosh
Edited by: ASHUTOSH TRIPATHI on Jul 22, 2009 10:35 AM

Authorisation issue in ME23N

Dear Gurus,
In the production system one user is having authorization only for ME23N and till yesterday he was able to use it. But now he is getting No authorization for document type "OPA" and activity "03". Our basis people checked authorization for the particular and he is having the required authorization. I mean for object "M_BEST_BSA" for activity "03" and for "BSART" document type "OPA".
Basis team has not made any changes and am not sure how this issue started suddenly. Any inputs to resolve this please. Immediate help is really appreciated.
Regards,
GM

Quick solution for this:
You tell the username to BASIS team who is having this authorisation and they can simply add the saem roles to that particular user.....It may happend many times that BASIS missed out some roles or groups........

AppleTV 1 Authorisation Issues Again

Old 40GB AppleTV 1 running 3.02 software.
Purchased Rio kids movie October 28th including iTunes Extras. SD version only.
Movie and Extras played, though Extras navigation a little flaky.
Today purchased The Lion King HD/SD with iTunes Extras.
iTunes Extras menu loaded fine but Movie/Scenes would not authorise. Did nto look at all extras.
Winston suggested making a purchase on his AppleTV1 made things authorise.
Downloaded a free podcast to AppleTV1 - this did not help. Did not test with a paid movie/music purchase.
Some time ago, AppleTV content would occasionally not authorise if it had not been played in iTunes though from memory this was standalone mode when itunes/internet unavailable and for synced not streamed material. Playing The Lion King in itunes did not help.
Mac with The Lion King configured for Sharing not Syncing, so removed its iTunes entry from Settings>Computers on AppleTV and re-added the same iTunes library as a Shared library again (seconds compared to a resync).
Immediately AppleTV 1 would now play The Lion King Movie.
Conjecture, but seems to me that AppleTV 1 may get issued some kind of authorisation certificate for movie playback, that will not allow playback for certificates older than the one issued? Maybe it's more than that and some newer content requires additional authorisation.
Unclear as yet if any additional purchases will now play or require authorisation steps again.
Also unclear to me if this perhaps only affects HD purchases not SD.
I bought an HD series that would not play on my Mac Pro due to HDCP restrictions once, while other HD content would play.
Lots of permutations to try test here, but once authorisation accepted you can't test the others.
It will be interesting to see if this movie will play without an internet connection.
Yet again, DRM inconveniences the paying customer not those who download illegaly and laugh at paying customers.
Feedback to Apple again required:
Apple - Apple TV - Feedback
AC

Downloaded a free podcast to AppleTV1 - this did not help. Did not test with a paid movie/music purchase.
Podcasts are not protected, I'd assume that's why they didn't help.
......so removed its iTunes entry from Settings>Computers on AppleTV and re-added the same iTunes library......
That's another of the workarounds that has been offered, I took the view it was a little convoluted for someone with 140 GB synced to the Apple TV, and that a direct purchase was probably the simplest of the workarounds.
Haven't had any response about this issue from Apple yet, I have to assume they are aware of it, but it would be nice to know something.

PB30 authorisation issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for