PBS APP Streaming Low Quality on NOVA Only

Hi,
For the past couple of days or so the PBS App on AppleTV is streaming in low-res for NOVA episodes only (Frontline, for example, is just fine). Is anyone else having this problem? I can't seem to find a support contact email from PBS to contact them directly (is there one?). Just curious if anyone else is having the same problem.
Thanks,
George

After reading the recent news about Netflix paying network interconnection fees and learning more about the CDN/Transit landscape in general, I'm convinced that these performance issues are not directly related to Apple or the Apple TV. It seems that HBO and PBS' CDN or transit provider is experiencing congestion that results in poor performance. I recently read that at least Netflix used a separate CDN for Apple TV streams. If HBO is doing the same thing, then that would explain the performance difference you see between your smart tv and the Apple TV.
Unfortunately, as consumers I don't think we have much recourse here. Best case scenario, Apple pressures it's content partners to better support the Apple TV, but given that Apple views this product as supportive of the iTunes platform, it seems unlikely we should expect Apple to focus on improving streaming products for competing services.

Similar Messages

  • How to put in low quality without use the mouse ?

    Hello,
    I look for a means to put an flash player application in low quality by passing only by the keyboard.
    By example, for put in high quality, I can use the hotkey shortcut ctrl + h.
    I search that too for the option 100% and "afficher tout" (in french).
    Thank you very good.
    (sorry for my approximately English)

    You can change the quality with the stage class in ActionScript. For example:  stage.quality= StageQuality.LOW;
    If you want to use key events to change that then you will have to create keyboard event listener and in your event listener function you change the stage's quality.
    Hope this give you some insight

  • Problems with "save for web" app low quality messed up images

    Please help I have never had a problem with the "save for web" application before (over three years) I am currently running A.I. cs3 on windows vista. in the past whenever I save anything this way the images were always clean. as of yesterday everything I try to save through the save for web app the images are very low quality all the vector has jagged edges, it is very low rez looking and the file sizes are very small, half the size they normaly would be. What did I do to change the settings or better yet how can I get it back to the way it was.

    Thank you for your help I moved the folder but it still did not fix this problem. it is also not just the jpg option under the save for web app but all the setting ie. gif, png, ect. ect. Also the the files sizes are much less, example I exported a design as a jpg with the quality setting about 6 the file size was 374kb when I exported the same design through the save for web app the file size was only 45 kb on the quilty setting of 100. further more in the preview screen of "save for web" the original images as well as the optimized both look messed up. The "save for web" app has always worked for me in the past never a problem and I use this app alot so it is very important.

  • How to republish stream with lower quality

    Hey guys, I was wondering is there a way that I can receive stream on my broadcast server and then republish that stream with lower quality on the same broadcast server. I was reading server side API reference but I couldnt find anything like that.
    Only thing I found is to use %i in FMLE Stream field and then broadcast same stream with different bitrates, but can I take live stream that is being broadcasted and republish it with lower quality/bitrate on the server side somehow?
    Or there is another way to achieve this?
    I am running FMS 4.5 and I am using FMLE to broadcast video to the server.
    Thank you for your answers.

    FMS can't transcode streams. What you could do is use FFMPEG to pull the stream from FMS and publish a transcoded stream back into FMS.
    Alternately, you could use Wowza Media Server and their transcoder plugin (fairly easy), or Wowza and Xuggler (requires a fair amount of programming)

  • Low-quality copy (to the clipboard) in Keynote and Pages

    Hello,
    I am running Keynote 6.5 under OS 10.10 on MacBook Air. Just after updating to Yosemite I have noticed that if I copy (command-c) something from Keynote (say, some text, or a graphic) and try to paste it outside (in Preview, or in Word) I get a low-quality image (bitmap rather than vector). It was not like this before. Also, I have verified that this problem is limited to Keynote and Pages; i.e., copying something out of (e.g.) Powerpoint works perfectly (vector image).
    Anyone can help?

    I can confirm this is also a problem with Numbers. Anything copied out of the iWork apps appear to lose the ability to be pasted as a .PDF, even in applications that can accept the higher quality .PDF format. (In looking into it, there's additional weirdness I'm seeing related to iWork and the clipboard, but that's for elsewhere).
    At this time, the only possible thing you can do to get high quality output from Keynote is to Export as a PDF, then open that and crop it.
    Just to help a bit more, when you check Preview for how to crop a PDF, the help is incorrect. The command you're looking for is not
    Choose View > Show Edit Toolbar,
    it's
    Choose View > Show Markup Toolbar
    However, I haven't tried to see if you can get PDF's without backgrounds... checking now
    I've also confirmed that Keynote '09 can still produce .PDF's from copied content. And, I am using a MacBook Pro.

  • How to fix low quality icons in dock?

    I know it's been around for a while but I still didn't find any solution. My problem is that any new icons that appears in my dock are low quality only. Even if it's native Apple app like Pages...
    Any solution how to permanently fix this issue?

    I have a similar (or worse) problem.
    Many of my icons appear in very low quality. This affects customised folder or hard disk icons, but also applications. Both in the Finder and in the dock.
    Even the just updated iWorks icons appear as if a tiny size image has been blowen up.
    Funnily, they did appear just fine before installing the update.
    It looks like everything that was on my boot disk when upgrading to ML looks still fine, but everything copied afterwards, or mounted afterwards gets these low resolution icons.

  • Low quality of burned DVD even if I drag&drop iMovie project into iDVD

    Hi all,
    I've a iMovie HD project that I want to burn via iDVD (7.0.4).
    If I click "Share with iDVD" the quality of the resultung video (which is burned to DVD) is rather poor. As I've read within this discussions, the preferred way is to close iMovie and "drag and drop" the iMovie project into iDVD.
    With this way, iDVD (instead of iMovie) will render the movie, which should give a video with far more quality.
    Unfortunately, the burned DVD with the "drag and drop" method has the same low quality as the video with "Share with iDVD".
    I've done a little research and noticed that the "shared movie" for iDVD (iMovie project->Show package Contents->Shared Movies->iDVD) for a 1:10 video has a filesize of only 32kb!
    Is there any way to set the "export" parameters for this "shared movie" (it is a quicktime file)?
    The quality of the completed DVD is acceptable if I export the iMovie project to "DV stream" an import this stream into iDVD. But in this case I lose all my chapter markers of the movie ..
    Is there any way to export the movie from iMovie HD and keep all the chapter markers for iDVD?
    Importing the iMovie HD project into iMovie 08/09 is not an option, as I lose the chapter markers also ..
    Thanks in advice,
    Kind regards.

    Hi,
    the iMovie project was created as "DV" project and I imported DV PAL clips. The iDVD preferences are also PAL (25fps) and the quality setting is "professional quality".
    I've also tried the setting "best performance" within iDVD (as suggested within this forum), but with the same poor result.
    I can see within the iDVD "project info" that iDVD will use "mymovie.mov" within the "Shared Movies->iDVD" of the iMovie project (Show package contents).
    As this converted movie is of low quality, I think this is the root of evil.
    If I export the movie from iMovie with "Export as DV stream" and import this converted movie into iDVD the quality is ok - but I lose the chapter markers ..
    Is there any way to keep the chapter markers?
    Kind regards.

  • Low Quality Video and Photo on iCloud

    I recently upgraded from an iPhone 4 to an iPhone 6, in doing so thought I would take advantage of the iCloud facility.  What a great idea until I replayed the video back, talk about grainy low quality same for the photos.
    Is there a fix for this or am I the only one with the issue?  All items play back on the phone perfectly.  iCloud is useless unless I can get my pictures backed up and uploaded to the iCloud in their original format.
    Can anyone help with regards to this issue.
    Thanks

    Hello Double24,
    Lets start with taking a look at the articles below so you can get your photos to show up on your PC. Make sure that you have installed iCloud for Windows and make sure the Photos option is enabled which it should be by default. If you are not seeing all of your photos, keep in mind that it will not sync photos past 30 days and has a maximum of 1,000 photos that can be stored on your My Photo Stream. You may just need to import the photos to your computer if you have not been able to get all of them for that reason that I just stated. Let me know if this works for you.
    Get help using My Photo Stream
    http://support.apple.com/en-us/ts3989
    iCloud for Windows
    http://support.apple.com/kb/dl1455
    Import photos and videos from your iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch to your Mac or Windows PC
    http://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201302 
    Regards,
    -Norm G.

  • Lower quality when viewing in Preview

    I have this issue on a BP with 10.5.4 and also a G4 with 10.4.11., and that is that images in Preview are not the same as viewed in any other app, which all look the same. I'm not talking about the look of colors or symptoms of having mismatched profiles, because the colors and shades are the same. But there's a subtle, though definite, slightly lower quality look when using Preview. I've been through the limited preference options and nothing makes it right.
    It's almost as if there's a very slight noise, or unsharp mask artifact, or resolution mismatch (toggling the "respect DPI doesn't make it disappear) though it doesn't appear it other apps.
    What's the deal? : )
    Thanks.

    I'm disappointed that Mail on the mac has not added options to control Marking as Read When Viewing in the Preview Pane. I'm using Mail 3.6 (latest as of July 2009) on 10.5.7, and this is still not supported. I have just finished switching to a new mac from a PowerBook G4 867 which I purchased in 2002, and I moved Entourage v.X (not even 2004 or 2008) app and mailboxes over to my new macbook pro. Then I used Mail 3.6 to Import Mailboxes from Entourage. I also imported contacts to Address Book and calendar items to iCal, etc. Finally I can leave Entourage behind --> Not necessarily.
    Entourage v.X and Windows Outlook have had this feature for at least five years. Why has this feature been skipped in Mail all this time?
    Previewing a message is not the same as Reading the message. Situation one: I like to use the up/down arrows to scroll quickly through messages, and consider which are the most important. Oops, now they're all marked Read! Situation two: Occasionally I click on the wrong message. Oops - it's marked Read now.
    Simplest solution: Provide an on/off control: Mark Previewed Messages as Read - on or off
    Richer solution: Provide timer control: Mark Previewed Messages as Read After 'n' seconds: - <n>
    At least give us the Simpler boolean solution.
    I found several threads on the same topic marked as Answered/Resolved. The workaround of getting rid of the preview pane is a poor workaround compared to what has been requested though it seems to be all we have so far. Admins should close the dangling threads only after posting a note indicating why.
    TruePreview was proposed as a solution in one of the threads, but I have not tried that. If others have tried and are happy with it, please let me know.
    Thanks...Alan

  • Force Flash 10 games into low quality always. Help please.

    I have an old computer and Flash always being set to "HIGH" everywhere is KILLING me.
    I can't go on facebook myspace or pretty much anywhere without it taking ages to load. Once it loads i put everything to "Low" and it's fine...until it refreshes! and its back to high.
    I also used to enjoy playing many flash based games. No longer can i play them due to everything being set to HIGH !
    Ninja Warz for example, i love this game, but whenever i actually manage to load into a fight,  i get stuck there for 15 minutes trying to load back to the home screen!
    There HAS to exist some way, some script, some browser, some program that will AUTOMATICALLY make anything flash appear in LOW QUALITY by DEFAULT ???
    Please, flash owns the internet, everything is run on flash. Default=HIGH is ruining my internet experience!
    I have tried googling the problem and what i''ve heard is
    Get Firefox
    Get Greasemonkey
    So i did, the only things regarding the function of "Flash quality=low" is one script, and posts dating back to 2004!!.
    The script has worked for me, but ONLY for EMBEDDED Flash. Such as youtube videos and some advertisements. Those are set to low. It has helped tenfold with internet browsing. BUT the script does NOT work with pop-out flash games! such as newgrounds games or Facebook applications like farmville, ninja warz. etc.
    Those are all still set to high, and yes if i set them to low they work just fine, but they reset themselves to high in under 5 minutes! one smooth battle in ninja warz is all i get until i have to go back to the home screen which sets everything back to high!
    http://apps.facebook.com/ninja-warz/
    thats the program i mainly want to run LOW !!!!

    wesFri
    Download the new driver
    Intel® Iris™ and HD graphics Driver for Windows 7, 8, 8.1 64 bit
    Update the other Drivers and bios
    http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?docnam​e=c00033108&lc=en&cc=us&dlc=en
    Say thanks by clicking the "Kudos! Star" which is on the left.
    Make it easier for other people to find solutions, by marking my answer with "Accept as Solution" if it solves your issue.

  • Who is suppose to Fix the Poor Streaming Audio quality?

    Just a quick question
    Who is suppose to fix the bad sounding streaming audio quality?
    This this something Google / Verizon / Motorola will fix or is this left for the developers to fix?
    I can not stand telling my phone not to update but I cant said the poor audio quality more!!!!
    Someone fix this please

    I installed 2.2 on the 1st Droid replacement they gave me- no apps, wallpapers, etc were installed since the phone was updated to 2.2 straight out of the box. The battery level was almost full before install. Upon installing 2.2, the battery could not hold a charge within 10 minutes. On the 2nd Droid replacement, I took the same battery that had indicated a 5% battery level and put it into the new replacement (which was on 2.1), and it immediately read as 70%.
    I agree that some apps may cause a conflict, however in my case Froyo was clearly the culprit....so to assume that all these problems are self-inflicted is **bleep**.
    johnM356 wrote: 
    wfooffroad wrote:
    Its amazing how so many of the same phones get the same update and each phone takes the update differently causing different problems for each phone.
    Exactly, and since the phones are physically identical, that tells me all these problems being reported are self-inflicted - ie; almost surely a result of an installed app, and not the phone itself.  That's the only variable, right?

  • How can I replace one low quality source with another high quality one ?

    Am I really this dumb or is it really this hard ?
    I have one timeline / project / edit that essentially references one long source clip / event / file.
    I have a newer higher quality transcoded version of the same source and want to replace the original lower quality version and end up with the same edited result just with better quality images !?
    It's the same frame rate and image dimensions  but "relink" tells me the new file is not "similar" enough and won't do it !
    Why is this so hard ? Is there a way to export a good old fashioned edl and then just reconform using the new source ?
    What if I wanted to to replace low res offline footage with finished colour-corrected material and output a finished master - would that be this clueless as well ?
    Please let me know the problem is between the chair and the keyboard - not between the hard disk and the power cord !

    Guessing that when you created the higher quality media, it was done outside of FCP and probably changed some important metadata that the app is looking for. Or perhaps there is a difference between the original audio and the new audio.
    Anyway, Luis' advice about the replace edit seems like the easiest solution.
    a_mumford wrote:
    What if I wanted to to replace low res offline footage with finished colour-corrected material and output a finished master - would that be this clueless as well?
    The usual way to do offline online is within FCP – creating the proxies and then using Preferences to switch back to and from.
    If you sent it out for grading, the Relink should work fine. If you haven't seen this kb doc, it's worth reviewing.
    Russ

  • Photoshop Elements 11 Organizer: Full screen view of lower quality than with PSE 10 and before?!

    Upgrading from PSE 10 to 11, I noticed that when I watch my images with the organizer in PSE 11 in full screen view mode (F11), while the images load faster, they are shown in a lower quality than in PSE 10 or any other version of PSE that I owned before. In PSE 11, after the initial viewing in full screen (in the "fit screen" mode), when I click with the mouse on an image to display the "100%" view, there is a delay and the program says "Loading...", after which the 100% view in the full screen mode appears. When I then click another time with the mouse on the image to get back to "fit screen" mode, I get an image of better quality than during the initial view!
    So it seems like the program first gives a faster, but lower quality view of the image in full screen mode, and only after the user requests a 100% view, it actually loads the image with full detail, which is then preserved when going back to the "fit screen" view. This is a serious issue for me, because I also use PSE organizer to present my pictures to other people, and I don't want to show them some lower quality versions of my images, but the full quality ones, without having to first choose "100% view" and then go back to "fit screen".
    How can I make the PSE 11 organizer give me a full-quality full screen image right away, as this used to be the case in PSE10 and before?
    (I have both versions, PSE 11 and PSE 10, now on the same computer and tested this to confirm that the PSE 11 initial full screen view is of lower quality than the PSE 10 one. Also in PSE 10, there is practically no delay for displaying the "100%" view afterwards, indicating that the image was loaded with full detail right away.)

    - Update:
    * Adobe's senior support level has replied to me about this issue as follows:
    "Thank you for contacting Adobe.
    When you press the F11 button, Organizer 11 uses the Bicubic
    interpolation mainly because it is less processor intensive compared to
    Bicubic Sharper, and it helps to create the preview on the fly, rather
    than based on the thumbnail cache.
    When you zoom out from the 100% view, Elements Organizer uses Bicubic
    Sharper. This is because Bicubic Sharper is used for image reduction, so
    if the 100% view is larger than the available screen space, it will need
    to shrink. The Bicubic Sharper images may look more crisp however, Like
    any sharpening algorithm, Bicubic Sharper introduces halos and
    edge-enhancement artifacts. Those halos are typically slight, but any
    further sharpening (which you'll need when preparing an image for print,
    for example) will exaggerate them.This is expected behavior. The
    Organizer isn't great for determining exact quality, I recommend you to
    use Elements Editor for this purpose.
    Thank you,
    Bobby Johnson,
    Adobe Technical Support."
    * My reply on this to Adobe is:
    "Hello Bobby,
    thank you for your reply. Now at least we are talking about the same thing.
    Why I am wondering about the choice to use the "Bicubic" algorithm when pressing F11 in PSE 11 is that all previous versions of PSE that I owned (which spans from PSE 6 to PSE 10) did use the "Bicubic Sharper" algorithm right away when pressing F11. So apparently Adobe didn't worry about processor intensity of this algorithm then, and computers are getting all the time more powerful.
    It is true that in some situations, the "Bicubic Sharper" algorithm may introduce halos and edge-enhancement artifacts, as you write. On the other hand, especially on smaller resolution screens, the results of the "Bicubic Sharper" algorithm may look more crisp and lively, while the ones of the "Bicubic" algorithm may look more flat and lack fine detail. This is not only my personal opinion, but as I have brought up this topic in several forums, I can see that I am not alone here.
    So assuming that the question about preferring "Bicubic Sharper" or "Bicubic" as a default algorithm when pressing F11 is partly a matter of taste, and partly a matter of the hardware the user has available, why can Abobe not give the user an option to choose which one he/she would prefer? For instance, F11 gives full screen view with "Bicubic" applied, and CTRL+F11 with "Bicubic sharper"? Or make this an option in the preferences?
    As I am using the PSE organizer also to present pictures to other people (and I know many people who use it that way too), I would like to show them my pictures as sharp and detail-rich as possible. Therefore, I would highly appreciate an option as described above to be implemented in the PSE 11 organizer via an update. It should be fairly easy from a programming point of view, since both algorithms are already contained in the program anyway."
    * If you support this suggestion of mine as stated above, please also contact Adobe accordingly! The more support requests they get for this, the more likely it is that they will implement this update! You may mention my case number 0184046323 for reference.

  • Low quality warning

    I have a calendar made in iphoto 9.  When trying to save to PDF or previewing a low quality warning, which I can only partially read, appears and the rest of page is blank.  I have checked the photos on the page and replaced them.  I don't understand why this is happening.  I have saved this same calendar before as a PDF with no problems.  I recently made a few changes, but not on the page that the warning is appearing on.  There is a red alert icon on one of the calendar pages and oddly it has moved.  It was on one month and now it's on another month.  I don't want to redo the entire calendar.  Please help.  Thanks.

    Have you previewed this way -
    Before ordering your book preview it using this method - http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1040 - and save the resulting PDF for reference - the delivered book will match it.
    what is the physical size and what are the pixel dimensions of the photo with the low quality warning?
    LN

  • Low quality images in web gallery from Output Module

    So when I create a web gallery slideshow using the output module I get SUPER-low quality images, like big jagged, pixellated lines in place of any diagonal line in the pictures. However, only photos in the portrait orientation are affected by this problem. Landscape-oriented photos look perfectly normal, just smaller.
    My first thought was that maybe the images were low quality in the web gallery preview but wouldn't be in the actual saved file, but alas I saved the index.html file and when I preview it in my web browser I get the same result with the portrait-oriented photos.
    Any idea how to fix this? Other than only using landscape photos in my gallery of course!
    Thanks!

    The same problem here. I've noticed it just yesterday, but my Safari rendering is affected the same way.
    I don't think it has anything to do with the recent updates. I reinstalled my MacOS X Leopard day ago and all the images (jpg, gif) have been somehow in lower quality ever since that moment. Even before I installed all new updates today.
    The strangest think is, that it wasn't like this before the reinstallation. I used the same media, and I have, indeed, the same machine.
    I'm hopeless. Have you already found some solution? Or anybody? Would be great...
    Martin

Maybe you are looking for

  • Help needed for project

    hi....i wanna ask anyone who can help tell me how you can put a .gif file such that the html file can show the .gif picture and a random number generator applet together UPON click on a button. u see....there are many .gif files and on the base of th

  • NON Creative Cloud CS6 indesign will not open Spinning wheel of death

    We have 8 of 16 Mac Yosemite computers all imaged the same way and all other adobe CS6 NON Cloud they work fine.  However when we open InDesign only we get the spinning wheel of death and I have to Force close the program.  Adobe offers NO chat or Ph

  • Acrobat Reader X is only allowing "Save As" versus "Save"  why?

    We have recently been upgraded (questionable) to Acrobat X.  Now when we go into a PDF and make an annotation or comment, we want to close and save the file.  It is only allowing for a Save As--is there a setting that needs to be checked?  Have not e

  • What is the Best Practice for publishing Offline Root CA Cert and CRL to Active Directory?

    Hi, I've read and seen in a few labs different approaches to what is published in Active Directory for a Offline Root CA.  I've seen just the Root Cert published to AD as well as the Root Cert and the Root CRL published to AD.  I can understand why t

  • List of Industrial Machinery companies

    Dear SAP friends, I would like to get a hold of Industrial Machinery existing client list, can anybody help me please? Thank you. Banu