PC monitor too dark

I watch Showtime Anytime over the internet on a PC desktop and the screen image is so dark that I can barely see the images. Is there an adjustment I can make to lighten the screen?

janeklaw wrote:
I watch Showtime Anytime over the internet on a PC desktop and the screen image is so dark that I can barely see the images. Is there an adjustment I can make to lighten the screen?You should be able to go into the monitor's settings and adjust the contract, brightness and sharpness....   What brand and model Monitor are you using?

Similar Messages

  • LCD monitor too dark on Mac Mini

    I have tried both a Viewsonic VP730b and a Samsung 740BX and both are way too dark.
    Here's the wierd thing. If you unplug the DVI connector in the back, and plug it back in, the image looks good.
    But if you then restart the mini, the image goes back to being way too dark.
    Any suggestions ?
    thanks,
    m

    Apple, are you there ?
    Apple don't really monitor these discussions - they are user-to-user so the only way to have Apple themselves respond to this is by contacting them and reporting the issue. here, you'll only get responses from other Apple users - except in rare instances where an Apple staffer may hit on a problem he/she decides to help with. That isn't to say a Moderator may not notice you message and escalate the issue upwards, but of course that wouldn't help your specific case.
    OK, all that said, it sounds to me like your display is not being correctly autodetected, and that the system DOES correctly autodetect the monitor when you unplug the display and plug it back in, but fails to again at the next reboot.
    The first thing to suggest is that you ensure the DVI adaptor is very firmly inserted into the port, and the thumb screws tightened up completely. A number of video problems with minis have been caused by slightly loose/poor contact issues with the DVI adapter so it needs to be solidly attached. next is then ensure the VGA connector from the screen is firmly attached to the DVI adaptor and the thumb screws tightened. Then reboot.
    If the screen comes up dim/dark even after the connectors are firm, open the displays preference panel. Does the name of your display (or it's model number) appear at the top of the panel? If not, then the display isn't detected, so click the 'Detect Displays' button. If that doesn't bring the display model up, then the most likely cause is either the display isn't outputting the correct signal to auto detect (very unlikely with these two models you list) or the DVI adapter is faulty.
    If the display name is showing, click the Color tab, then the calibrate button, and run through a basic calibration (ie, Expert Mode UNchecked). At the end, save the calibrated profile and exit the preference pane. The reboot. If the Mac detects the display at all, it should autoload the calibrated profile you saved and thus the problem should disappear.
    If the fault remains, then again it could be a faulty DVI adapter, or an issue with a MacOS preference pane. If you go through the procedure I suggest and the problem still persists, post back.

  • Monitor too dark

    I have a Lenovo C540 all-in-one computer with windows8 I recently purchased.  Prior to purchasing it I had a windows XP with a HP2310m Full HD LCD monitor which worked great. But now that I have attached it to my Lenovo as a 2nd monitor, the screen is grayish.  When a background should be perfectly white, it isn't.  Yet, when I attached the HP monitor to my laptop, it has perfect colors with clear white.  I have used the Calibrate Display' software in Win8, but that hasn't helped.
    thanks.

    Hello joeleonard,
    I understand that your monitor is dark when connect to your Lenovo laptop.
    Turn off the monitor.
    Remove the power cable and hold down the power button for 15 sec.
    This will reset the monitor.
    Try setting the monitor to factory setting.
    Press the menu button.
    Select factory reset.
    Select Yes.
    Here is link to your service manual for your monitor.
    It has a few steps for trouble shooting issues with the monitor.
    Let me know how everything goes.

  • Images too dark on Samsung monitor - please help!

    We've just upgraded a Samsung 21" monitor to a Samsung 30" (305T).
    In just TWO applications, Photoshop CS3 and Windows Photo Gallery (Vista64), all photographic images are much too dark. Not subtly, about 3-4 f-stops too dark.
    EVERY other of our applications INCLUDING ADOBE BRIDGE AND FIREWORKS, and even Photoshop itself during Save to Web, displays the photos as they should appear.
    I've tried setting various profiles in Windows Color Management as the default, including the ICC profile sRGB IEC61966-2.1 (which my reading says we should be using), as well as WCS profiles sRGB virtual and scRGB virtual, and tried using no profile at all. None of these changes makes any apparent difference at all to the images we're seeing.
    In Photoshop, I've tried various options too. If set to Monitor Color (Monitor RGB - * wscRGB) Photoshop then displays images as it should. However the Camera Raw display when loading Nikon images is still much too dark, and the Photoshop Save to Web images are much too light. Arrrgh!
    The monitor does not include any driver software, just electronic documentation (poorly edited) which offers no advice about this. I've seen references to various Gamma utilities, but not sure that's what I need. Is it?
    Any help or suggestions would be much appreciated!
    TIA

    Thanks Peter & Sid. I appreciate the advice, but it doesn't match our experience over 12 years of designing web applications so I'm having trouble understanding what's different, can I ask for any more advice you might have?
    If we calibrate the monitor using the recommended tools, will Photoshop images look 2-3 f-stops brighter (i.e. as they should look) and will images in all other apps (which look fine now, have always looked fine) look 2-3 f-stops too bright? Or would we be changing JUST the way Photoshop sees the images?
    Through probably a dozen different previous CRT and LCD monitors, we've never calibrated anything. Even on our immediately-previous Samsung 213T monitor, images appear pretty much the same in Photoshop as they do in all other places. That includes published web sites viewed with several popular browsers and viewed on literally hundreds of different systems inside and outside of our office.
    The previous monitor was being used with exactly the same software and hardware as the new one. The only thing that's changed is the monitor.
    Peter asks about brightness or white point luminance. I haven't used any tool to determine that. The monitor is set to 50% brightness, for whatever that's worth, but I can tell you that it is substantially BRIGHTER on white than the previous monitor. The previous Samsung monitor is being run side-by-side with the new one, and it looks quite dull and yellow beside the new one (and we thought it was a great monitor!) The new 30" Samsung has MUCH whiter whites. Does that help even a little?
    Thanks for any further advice.

  • Presentation is too dark on external monitor

    I have a 2.66 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo MBP 17" with 4GB of factory RAM running OS 10.6.3.
    At the last two meetings I've been at, my presentation on the external VGA monitor for the audience (large room, 1000 people) has been a bit too dark. The presentation looks great on my screen. Someone from the audience said that this is a known issue with a new Mac software update, something to do with the gamma curve, but I don't really understand what this means.
    I have a Mac in a corporate PC world, where many folks are just looking to find a reason to "dis" Mac technology. Any suggestions as to how to fix this bug would be greatly appreciated! Thank you!

    It is indeed a known issue (see, for example, http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=11408594) and there are a lot of users waiting with bated breath for a solution. In the meantime, the only way to 'correct' the problem completely is to revert back to 10.6.2 (instructions provided in the thread quoted above). Short of that, some suggestions that others have made that might help:
    Go to Displays in System Preferences
    Select Color and Display all profiles
    Selecting Generic RGB Profile or perhaps Wide Gamut RGB
    This is a serious problem for me as I am a university professor and rely on my laptop to give lectures. And I too am conscious of the PC users that love to heckle while glowing smugly at the slightest evidence of a Mac bug. We will always have the last laugh, however.

  • Pictures too dark - not a monitor calibration problem

    I believe this is some kind of color space or EXIF data issue I'm having. The jist of it is this: if I view one of my pictures (they're in jpg format) in Windows Explorer, they look fine. But when Lightroom opens the picture or displays it in the library, it looks too dark. (Important note: this is not a monitor calibration issue. Searching on Google reveals tons of advice along these lines, but that's not what's happening here. Lightroom is simply displaying things differently than anything else.)
    Photoshop had this problem also, but Adobe supplied a patch that made Photoshop ignore the color space EXIF data so my pictures would display "correctly". There does not seem to be any such equivalent fix for Lightroom. I'm using Windows XP - perhaps there's something I can do in the OS to fix this issue? I believe most of my pictures are sRGB.
    How do I get Lightroom to display my pictures correctly? They are, of course, impossible to edit while they display like this. Thanks in advance for any help!

    Thanks for the responses. I freely admit I don't understand color management. I also admit I have not calibrated my monitor. I know, therefore, that my colors are not perfectly synchronized across all my devices - and I'm fine with that for the moment, because they are close enough. What comes out of my camera, what is displayed on my monitor, and what comes out of my printer are all pretty close. I will calibrate soon and get even closer, but for now perfect color isn't my chief concern.
    My problem is not that the colors don't match, it's that the pictures are too dark when displayed in Lightroom. By "too dark", I mean several stops of exposure too dark. A picture will display a certain way on my camera and in Windows, and the histogram reflects this. Then I load it into Lightroom, and while the histogram looks the same of course, the picture itself is being displayed like I took it at night. Hence, as far as I can tell, it's not a monitor calibration issue. If I were to calibrate the monitor to display the pictures in Lightroom correctly, everything else would look too bright, wouldn't it? Including Lightroom itself. Besides, it wouldn't be possible to brighten my monitor to the point that the pictures looked acceptable - that's how dark they are.
    Here's another clue: if I'm at work, and I RDP to my PC at home, and open Lightroom in the RDP session, everything looks great. So, I'm thinking it's a Windows color space issue of some kind. The question is, since I admit I don't know much about color space, what might be the problem and how might I fix it?
    So to summarize: incorrect color calibration isn't my problem (though I know it's something I have to do if I ever want to perfectly match output on my monitor and printer). The colors across all my devices are close enough for my purposes. Incorrect color isn't my problem at all. The problem is that Lightroom on my PC displays pictures as if most of the histogram was on the left, even when that's not the case. The pictures in Lightroom look nothing like they look on my camera, in Windows Explorer, or when printed on my printer. Why is that, and what can I do to fix it? Thanks.

  • I have a Mac Book Pro 17 which starts but the screen is too dark to see. I have an external monitor connected but no signal. I need help. Thanks.

    I have Mac Book Pro 17 which starts but the display is too dark to see. I have separate display connected, but no signal to it. I need help. Thanks.

    The tv is a extended display on your mac like a second moitor you want to mirror them (same thing on both)
    This should help you

  • Photoshop saves JPEG images much too dark--any ideas?

    Hi there, I'm having an issue with my Photoshop applications and I was hoping someone could give me a little insight/help in fixing the problem.
    When working with a file in Photoshop (I am an artist, so I usually create my files from scratch rather than loading them from a camera), I can get the colors to appear as they should in the workspace. When I finish artwork, I make sure the colors are exactly as I want them, then save it as a JPEG file. However, if I open this JPEG file in any application--browsers, photo viewing programs--it is extremely dark and saturated. If I open the JPEG in Photoshop, though, it looks fine. This issue seems to have occurred spontaneously 3-4 months ago. I don't recall changing or deleting any of my monitor or video card preferences, or my color profiles. I was working with Photoshop Elements 4.0 at the time, and it suddenly started happening.
    Now, I have found a sort of work-around for it. If I screencap my workspace with the artwork open in it, then I can open up that screencap in Photoshop. The colors are much TOO bright and washed out when I do this, but if I crop the image so it's just the artwork and save it, then it displays in browsers and viewing programs more or less as it should, i.e. how I see it in Photoshop. However, if I open that JPEG in Photoshop, it will display much brighter than the original artwork.
    It's not a desperate issue since I have this weird work-around, but I'm currently trying to save images for printing--which means they need to be very large, and I'm not keen on zooming to 100% and screen-capping the art piece by piece, then stitching it all together before saving it. I'd really like to get this issue resolved. I thought it might have to do with the fact that I was using outdated software (PSE 4.0), but I've just recently upgraded to CS5 Extended and the same issue prevails.
    If it's any help, I'm working on an HP EliteBook 8740w, with Windows 7 and an NVIDIA Quadro video card.
    Here are the things I've tried, which haven't worked:
    Deleting Photoshop preferences/settings (in both PSE 4.0 and CS5)
    Uninstalling and re-installing both programs
    Re-calibrating my monitor
    Changing color settings in Photoshop (files still end up dark regardless)
    Disabling OpenGL Drawing
    Switching between file types when saving
    I am at my wit's end! I am mostly concerned that my clients and professors aren't going to see my work as it is intended to look, when they view it online. The erratic behavior of too-dark or too-light, and my pictures seemingly never displaying correctly on any browser or in any program, has me a little paranoid about my online portfolio, haha. I'm applying for an art scholarship in a month, and if none of my work will save correctly (much less print correctly!) then it will be a sad day indeed!
    As I said before, this problem seems to have popped up out of nowhere. My artwork from before the whole saving-too-dark issue began still displays perfectly in most programs, but the rest is totally hit-and-miss. If any of you have fixes or suggestions (even suggestions on adjusting Photoshop so that my images display more consistently in browsers and other programs) I would be extremely grateful.
    Thanks so much for your time,
    -Jenna

    Though you have solved your problem, be aware, that different applications have different ways to interpret color profiles that can be set in different ways.
    Example:
    In Firefox, you can either set a color profile or not -- AFAIK, it only works with v2 ICC profiles (vs. v4, v3 seems to have not been released).
    From that point, you can set perceptual, absolute, colormetric, or one other...(forget)... but usually you just set that to perceptual for monitor work as I understand it.  Then a 3rd FF setting (all in its registry, of course, though occasionally there are extensions that let you manage the three settings.  They correspond to values (accessible through 'about:config' in FF's address window), all under the prefix:
    "gfx.color_management."
    "display_profile"  -  text string of file containing a v2 ICC profile, usually in "C:\Windows\System32\Spool\drivers\color\" (at least on Win7) -- extention ".icm"
    "mode" -- when to turn it on (2=for pics that have profiles set, another is for always (1?)), maybe 0=off?
    "rendering_intent" - this corresponds to perceptual, abs, colormetric, types, I think 0=perceptual (default)
    for FF, if you google one of those values, you'll find more info on some mozillian-type site... "prefix<keyname>" (e.g. -  gfx.color_management.display_profile ).
    Other progs may have their own or if we are lucky would use the system profile & color management system (assuming it is any good).
    Getting an accurate monitor profile and keeping it updated as your monitor 'decays' (i.e. color is usually best when new, then they decay, w/useful life at max gamut ~ 18 months (in my experience), after that, you can still retune to the same white point, but with a loss of gamut due to the phosphors decaying at different rates).
    It's best to use some sort of external calibration HW... -- as an external device looking at your monitor through it's various colors is the only way to get a 'digitally objective' measurement.  That said, I always have concerns about the stability of the measuring device over time.  Does it have components that  that could cause non-linear measurement?  Am guessing not as likely, as it isn't emitting anything so less wear & tear, but I wouldn't assume it's 100% accurate over time either (but certainly is better than one's own eye which can gradually adjust to just about anything).  I had a viewsonic when I first got my current color device (a Spyder3), and it had gone from an original white point of 6500K down to 5700K -- and I had not noticed the difference (over 18-20 months)...
    I could bring it back in range, but had lost gamut, and was a bit below the sRGB (consumer grade) standard (which is some fractional
    value of the Adobe Photoshop or NTSC standards, which are similar in the size of their ranges, but slightly offset from each other).
    The result of all this -- I never really know how my images will look on other monitors, but I try to tag them w/my current monitor profile, hoping that if they care about color, they'll have some SW on their end that can make sense of it...but given my own experience in how SW on the same system handles color differently, I wouldn't say they were 'high hopes'... ;-)

  • Printing too dark in CS4

    I have CS4 on Tiger 10.4.11 on a completely color managed system, Epson 4800 printer. Printing seems to be broken in the new version. Prints are very dark. I know to select "Photoshop Manages Color" in Color Handling, and "No Color Management" in the printer color management dropdown. The procedure works fine in CS3.
    That something is up is suggested by this wrinkle. In this case I am printing using advanced b/w. If under color handling I choose "Printer Manages Color" and go into the b/w advanced setup, it's still too dark. If instead I choose "No color management", then make my choices in advanced b/w, it works fine.
    One would first think that it's a double color management problem, but I'm turning it off anywhere I can see it in CS4, and still having problems. Is there a new secret handshake I haven't puzzled out yet?

    > So, Eric, you are saying we need to Convert to a space (or gamma) in
    > Photoshop before Command+P -- because the Epson Adv B&W driver will
    > assume a color space/gamma -- what would that assumption be based on
    > (gamma of our Mac default MonitorRGB)? Assuming I am not talking
    > about feeding the Epson grayscale.
    Yes.
    The ABW driver wants to be fed gamma 2.2-encoded image data.
    This is why my standard recommendation for printing to the ABW driver __ONLY__ is to use:
    Color Handling = Photoshop Manages Colors
    Printer Profile = Adobe RGB
    Rendering Intent = Relative Colorimetric
    Black Point Compensation = Enabled
    Why does this work? Because no matter what your image working space is (e.g., sRGB, Adobe RGB, ProPhoto RGB, Apple RGB, ColorMatch RGB, etc.), doing this will cause your image data to be encoded in gamma 2.2 before the data gets passed off to the driver. (Adobe RGB has a gamma encoding of 2.2.)
    The same workflow will work in Lightroom, too. You just need to check the "Display Profiles" checkbox in Lightroom to access Adobe RGB when selecting a printer profile.
    If you are in grayscale mode instead of RGB mode, choose "Gray Gamma 2.2" instead of "Adobe RGB" for the printer profile.
    However, the catch is that -- as noted in this thread -- there is currently a glitch, which we (Adobe + Apple + Epson) are investigating. One of the symptoms of that glitch is that the above suggested workflow does not work on Leopard.
    > Does this CS4-Apple-Epson issue have anything to do with some users
    > reporting dark prints in Photoshop Manage Color - No Color
    > Adjustment Epson workflow? -- For example, someone using 1.8 gamma
    > Monitor RGB...
    Unlikely.

  • Hp D7360 photo prints are all too dark or red tinged

    every single photo we print we have to manually adjust settings to get it to look like the camera took it and the monitor shows it. they are always too dark or red toned. we do most of our printing in kodak easy share, i've changed color management from rgb to adobes and application manage and i printed from windows and fax viewer the only diffrences are the degree of darkness, is it impossible to just print them without fixing everyone!!!  help

    Hello Troy-B
    The product you have is a commercial printer. I suggest posting in the HP Business Support forum for a better chance at finding a solution.
    You may find the Commercial Designjet board here.
    http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/Printers-Designjet-Large-Format/bd-p/bsc-414
    Don't forgot to say thanks by giving "Kudos" to those that help solve your problems.
    When a solution is found please mark the post that solves your issue.

  • Photos in Web gallery too dark

    Hello,
    I just updated to the new iLife.
    I tried the new Web Gallery function and the photos are too dark compared to the view in iPhoto.
    Same happens with galleries in iWeb.
    What's wrong?
    JO

    There is a color problem when publishing pictures from iPhoto 06 and 08 (as well as when e-mailing a picture).
    The problem being that the images are published with their original color profile, whatever that is. Further, if profile is missing in the image in iPhoto, the profile will be missing in the output. (BUT iPhoto displays correctly in case there is an EXIF tag specifying sRGB).
    The result is that colors will not be displayed correctly on the WEB (or in e-mail clients), more or less depending on OS platform. This applies both to images and their thumbnails.
    Compare the iPhoto album http://www.tomasjonsson.eu/IPhotoTests/
    with an album with correct colors http://www.tomasjonsson.eu/PictureSite/Albums/Pages/PreAndPostProcessed.html
    In Safari, only IMG_9465 and IMG_5182 will show a difference - since those are the only images without a color profile. However, in other MS-Windows browsers, most images will be displayed incorrectly.
    Note! Most digital cameras produce images without at color profile but with an EXIF tag. In iPhoto:Preferences:Advanced choose Embed ColorSync profile, which will add a profile corresponding the EXIF tag. However, the images that you have already imported will not be fixed.
    Note to Apple: Show EXIF colors space and embedded color profile in Info pane. Add command - ASSIGN profile. And in export dialog - add option Color Space.
    HOW IT SHOULD BE
    Images on the web (and in general also e-mails) should be published in sRGB color space (otherwise they will not be displayed correctly in browsers on the MS-Windows platforms, with the exception of Safari, viewing images with a color profile)
    Images should have a color profile, in particular the sRGB images (otherwise they will not be displayed correctly on the MacOS platforms. Maybe close to correct if you have calibrated your monitor to PC-gamma)
    Actually all images should have a color profile, period. If the image does not have a color profile, it is just a pile of randomly colored pixels - to be interpreted freely by any displaying device, which they do.
    For a demonstration of profiles and WEB see: http://www.gballard.net/psd/golive_pageprofile/embeddedJPEGprofiles.html
    However, DO NOT follow this guys advice of omitting the color profile for WEB publishing because of overhead. The overhead is less than 1% of a high quality image. (I measured 0.5 - 2.5 kByte)
    WORKAROUND
    After exporting from iPhoto - use Photoshop and CONVERT TO PROFILE all images to sRGB color space. Save file with color profile.
    Note, make sure that images without original profile are treated correctly (most often they are sRGB, check the EXIF tag with Preview application)
    Note, apply also conversion to thumbnails.
    Tomas Jonsson, Genicore Embedded Technology AB

  • Images too dark? colorsync issue or corruption?

    I am not sure if this is related to Aperture, or not, but it is impacting the quality of my experience in Aperture...
    I have noticed that my MBP2007 display profile seems too dark, and I think there is some preference or application that is loading at startup that is interfering with it. I am using the default LCD profile for the MBP, and have made sure there are no other profiles selected (selecting other profiles does not appear to change the results in any positive way).
    Here is what I have observed: I noticed in Aperture that all my images seemed to need correction for being too dark. This is strange, since my Nikon seems to be taking perfectly balanced photos. So I started to dig around and remove all preferences that were associated with any color application I have used. I restarted and noticed that when the desktop image first appeared (a photo I had taken) it looked like it had the correct tonal range. Also, all the images in Aperture looked correct! However, this was short lived, and now each time when I restart, the process starts the same way, with the image appearing correctly at first, but then, as the menu bar started to appear, the image suddenly became too dark, as though a profile had just been applied! I have looked at the Console log, but cannot see anything that looks suspicious in terms of something that may be loading and interfering with the profile. I have tried to delete colorsync preferences, but have not been able to correct the issue again! Any ideas? I am really stumped by this!
    Thanks for any help!

    Hmm ... interesting. The ICC type MNTR Monitor profile for the display should be shown in the Devices section of the Apple ColorSync Utility.
    A generic ICC profile for the make and model of display is shown as Factory Profile and a measured ICC profile for the specific calibration state of the display is shown as Current Profile.
    The ICC MNTR profile shown in Apple ColorSync Utility > Devices > Display > Current Profile should be the same as the one shown in System Preferences > Display > Color.
    Apple ColorSync 2.5 introduced the VCGT Video Card Gamma Tag that sets the state of the video system to the state described in the measured profile.
    This was - and is - intended to do away with the difficulties caused by competing gamma utilities e.g. Knoll Gamma for Photoshop that tried to take control of the video system on startup.
    (selecting other profiles does not appear to change the results in any positive way).
    The intention of some who were involved in the ICC architecture was that working space profiles would by type SPAC Color Space, but then Apple and Adobe wanted type MNTR Monitor profiles to do this job.
    This produced the problem that type MNTR Monitor profiles have to do double duty, both as monitor profiles in which equal amounts of RGB do not produce gray and as working space profiles in which equal amounts of RGB do produce gray.
    So, this is why System Preferences > Display > Color shows both measured monitor profiles and monitor profiles for RGB working spaces such as sRGB, eciRGB, adobeRGB and so on and so forth. If you click a profile that is not your measured monitor profile, you reset the video system.
    Instead of resetting the video system, as you may be doing, install a good ICC profiling packing, calibrate your monitor, and characterise that state in a monitor profile that will be automatically installed by your ICC profiling package.
    Not all problems are configuration problems, some are bugs too, but if one has a sense of what the different dialogues do and how they are supposed to work together then problems produced by system misconfiguration can at least be eliminated in troubleshooting.
    /hh

  • Prints too dark with Photoshop Elements 10

    My photos are printing out much darker than what is on the monitor display.  I have calibrated the monitor and changed the color profile, color management & color space numerous times and they I cannot see any difference in the prints. I've changed the printer settings, still too dark.  I have edited the photos and brightened them, still much darker than on the display.  I'm using Photoshop Elements 10 with a new monitor and computer.  My old computer and Adobe Photoshop CS2 program did not have this problem.  Any suggestions?

    Check to be sure that color is not managed both by PSE and by the printer. In editor, go to Edit>color settings and check "always manage color for computer screens." Then, go to File>print>more options (lower left in the dialog)>Color Management tab>Color handling: "Printer Manages Color."
    Are drivers and firmware for your printer up to date?
    Do pictures print well via other applications with your equipment?
    Have you printed a file,  processed in Elements, at a kiosk, such as at CVS? How does that look?
    I assume that you are printing from Editor, not from Organizer. It is said that the print engines are not the same.

  • Images print too dark from Photoshop CS2 and CS3

    Having used both CS2 and CS3 I now realise that the prints that I work on in either appear much brighter on the screen that they do when printed, as much as 3 stops darker when printed. I have also noticed that in other programs such as Google Picasa that I use as a viewing tool the images appear closer to the images from the printer. I have used various pro-labs that require their profiles to be used and my own epson 3800 printer at home and despite trying lots of different settings I am unable to get prints that look like they do on the screen they are always darker.
    I am using windows XP on a dual core 2.4 PC with 2 Gb ram and an ATI Radeon X1600 series grafix card which I have just updated the driver on. The monitor is an LCD type and is calibrated weekly using a spyder 2 express.

    First isolate whether your display is too bright or your printer is too
    dark. I'd start by printing images from another source and see if they
    look as they should. www.drycreekphoto.com has a number of calibration
    images that should do for this purpose.
    Once you've isolated the problem, we can take it from there.

  • Color management help needed for adobe CS5 and Epson printer 1400-Prints coming out too dark with re

    Color management help needed for adobe CS5 and Epson printer 1400-Prints coming out too dark with reddish cast and loss of detail
    System: Windows 7
    Adobe CS5
    Printer: Epson Stylus Photo 1400
    Paper: Inkjet matte presentation paper with slight luster
    Installed latest patch for Adobe CS5
    Epson driver up to date
    After reading solutions online and trying them for my settings for 2 days I am still unable to print what I am seeing on my screen in Adobe CS5. I calibrated my monitor, but am not sure once calibration is saved if I somehow use this setting in Photoshop’s color management.
    The files I am printing are photographs of dogs with lots of detail  I digitally painted with my Wacom tablet in Photoshop CS5 and then printed with Epson Stylus 1400 on inkjet paper 20lb with slight luster.
    My Printed images lose a lot of the detail & come out way to dark with a reddish cast and loss of detail when I used these settings in the printing window:
    Color Handling: Photoshop manages color, Color management -ICM, OFF no color adjustment.
    When I change to these settings in printer window: Color Handling:  Printer manages color.  Color management- Color Controls, 1.8 Gamma and choose Epson Standard it prints lighter, but with reddish cast and very little detail and this is the best setting I have used so far.
    Based on what I have read on line, I think the issue is mainly to do with what controls are set in the Photoshop Color Settings window and the Epson Printer preferences. I have screen images attached of these windows and would appreciate knowing what you recommend I enter for each choice.
    Also I am confused as to what ICM color management system to use with this printer and CS5:
    What is the best ICM to use with PS CS5 & the Epson 1400 printer? Should I use the same ICM for both?
    Do I embed the ICM I choose into the new files I create? 
    Do I view all files in the CS5 workspace in this default ICM?
    Do I set my monitor setting to the same ICM?
    If new file opens in CS5 workspace and it has a different embedded profile than my workspace, do I convert it?
    Do I set my printer, Monitor and PS CS5 color settings to the same ICM?
    Is using the same ICM for all devices what is called a consistent workflow?
    I appreciate any and all advice that can be sent my way on this complicated issue. Thank you in advance for your time and kind help.

    It may be possible to figure out by watching a Dr.Brown video on the subject of color printing. Adobe tv
    I hope this may help...............

Maybe you are looking for

  • Dump error while running tcode

    Hi When i am running my payroll with standard tcode pc00_m10_calc that tcode is going into abap runtime error., I even checked with abap and basis but can able to solve the prob so kindly help me Error in the ABAP Application Program The current ABAP

  • Flash 10e.ocx Crash in IE8 on Win7

    I am trying to view a teleseminar in Internet Explorer 8 running on Windows 7 Ultimate (64-Bit).  I have tried running the session in Compatibility Mode but the application still causes Internet Explorer to stop working.  The problem signature provid

  • Satellite L500D - Missing drivers for Windows XP

    I apologize for my English, I am a Pole:) Hi I have a big problem, (I installed XP SP3 on L500D-149 PSLT0E) and now most importantly, I can not find drivers for: - System management bus controller - Video controller (ATI Radeon HD 3200) Not approache

  • Me21n change line item dropdown list value

    hi experts, i have a requirement to automatically remove the aulty po line item when user click on CHECK or SAVE button, i done this by removing the record from ETT[] and POT[] at ENHANCEMENT-POINT mm06ef0p_pruefen_01 SPOTS es_mm06ef0p_pruefen INCLUD

  • Is there any way to respond with imessage in the menubar?

    I have a 13 inch Macbook Pro running Mountain Lion and have been wondering if there is some way to put imessage in the menu bar for quick responding capablities? I have been looking for a number of ways to tweak my mac and speed up my workflow. Any s