PC Suite File Sync
I just downloaded the PC Suite 6.84.10.3 since I have been longin g file sync for long time. Unfortunately it seems to be working only partially. Changes on my E61i files are not identified as more recent from the suite and the older PC files are overwritten on the E61i (yes, I checked the clocks and they differ of 5 seconds).
Also changes on PC files are not always recognized.
Any suggestion ?
Also would be nice to sync files in multiple folders.
Andrea
Hi,
I know, that it not going to solve your problem completely, but with my technique the file sync option is more useful.
- Create a briefcase folder on your PC. This folder will be your sync folder what you set in PcSuite to sync.
- collect all your docs, folders, pictures and so on in this folder.
That's it, your files will be synced automatically. After PcSync finished, you have to sync your briefcase folder by right click on it and choose sync all.
With similar technique you can manage your bookmarks as well if you replace your Mobile bookmarks folder in your bookmarks folder with a briefcase folder called:Mobile bookmarks.
Cheers!
Miklos Szanyi
webmaster, designer
http://www.megamobilecontent.com
Themes, wallpapers, software, tips for all mobile devices
Similar Messages
-
File sync with ovi suite. Disappeared?
The wonder functionality of file sync (any file not only audio-img-video) seems not working in ovi suite.
Is it true?
Many thanksI guess pc suite supports this ... Maybe you can give that a try
Show appreciation by clicking the kudos star :-), or gesture by typing thanks -
Quickoffice Connect Mobile Suite - No file sync function
I bought the captioned product for my iPhone 4 and it works well except no file sync. It is very inconvenient that after I edit the file and need to manually download the file to my computer and after I modify the file on computer, I have to upload to my phone. I am unsure if it is the syncing of the phone issue or QuickOffice issue. Is there any solution to sync the files on my computer and phone once edited on either device. Thanks!
You should contact the people who make QuickOffice for support with their products.
http://support.quickoffice.com/index.php
It sounds as though you need the product below to do what you want:
http://www.quickoffice.com/quickofficeconnectiphone/ -
I have just installed the latest version and am having problems with file sync. Everything works fine, but it only seems to sync from the phone to the PC. Any changes to a file are not copied from the PC to the phone. The settings are set to sync both ways, but any changes to a PC file are not replicated, the log shows all files are being copied back from the phone every time I run the sync.
Any ideas?
DavidI finally had a reply from Nokia this week......
Dear Mr Keppler
Thank you for contacting Nokia Care.
With regard to your email concerning File Sync in Nokia PC Suite, the symptoms you are experiencing have been reported as a bug and are currently under investigation. This will not be resolved until the next release of Nokia PC Suite.
Please don't hesitate to contact us again if you have any further questions.
With best regards
UK & Ireland Team
Nokia Care
So thats it, it really is a problem and I wasnt going mad....Message Edited by dkeppler on 10-Aug-200708:35 PM -
Ovi suite should sync ovi maps
Hi,
just a gripe I hope Nokia will read. It would be nice if the ovi suite could 'sync' maps. What I mean is you can browse either the available maps or the maps on your phone. It can't show you the two together. What it *should* do, if Nokia actually used their own products, is show the available maps with some mark '*' to indicate which are already on your phone. When copying maps it should prompt you that a certain map is already on the phone and offer the opportunity to overwrite or skip.
You know, basic 1990's file sync stuff.
Maybe I'll send Nokia support an email.
SanderHi, look I really think you need to chill about this, you only need to update maps every couple of years, I work in the motor trade and most expensive factory fit sat nav systems are cd/dvd based and are generally not updated much more often than 18 months, the whole reason for loading maps onto your phone is to save data charges and speed everything up. If you have no maps on your phone navigation will still work if internet is connected as the phone will download maps 'on the fly' as it needs them, but it just slows things down and if you're out of your region will cost plenty in roaming charges (so download your foriegn destination on pc before you leave). Just enjoy your phone and free navigation
Cheers
If I have helped at all, a click on the White Star is always appreciated :
you can also help others by marking 'accept as solution' -
PC Suite vs.Ovi Suite for Syncing N900
I am coming from Blackberry with no Nokia experience whatsoever. I am running Windows 7 and Outlook 2007. I am used to a 2 way – or 1 way sync for my Blackberry – because really both are needed. I have read that PC Suite has more features than Ovi Suite for sync. That they “dumbed down” Ovi Suite and it only has 2 way capability.
The N900 is coming… I ordered it tonight. What is really the best software to sync my Outlook 2007 contacts (and possibly calendar) although I have read Outlook Calendar may not be possible..??..
Thanks – I would hate to install what might not be the best software to sync this phone… I am hoping to avoid any rough patches if at all possible.
SandyBodestone wrote:
I agree that it is annoying that the full support is not there yet but for me that is far more preferable than having had to wait until that end of it was sewn up entirely for the phone to be released.
There's enough there between the phone andPC Suite to cover more than jusrt the bare essentials and it gives us something to look fotward to
True. And this phone is so capable computer software to do "things" isn't as relevant. I haven't even had to do a battery pull or restart it. It is an amazing device for sure.
Also, I did test "copying and pasting" the converted music files from the Blackberry media card to the internal memoy of the N900 and it worked flawlessly! Even the album art work made it. I still may check out Double Twist, but at least this way if "free."
Sandy -
Performance Issue: Wait event "log file sync" and "Execute to Parse %"
In one of our test environments users are complaining about slow response.
In statspack report folowing are the top-5 wait events
Event Waits Time (cs) Wt Time
log file parallel write 1,046 988 37.71
log file sync 775 774 29.54
db file scattered read 4,946 248 9.47
db file parallel write 66 248 9.47
control file parallel write 188 152 5.80
And after runing the same application 4 times, we are geting Execute to Parse % = 0.10. Cursor sharing is forced and query rewrite is enabled
When I view v$sql, following command is parsed frequently
EXECUTIONS PARSE_CALLS
SQL_TEXT
93380 93380
select SEQ_ORDO_PRC.nextval from DUAL
Please suggest what should be the method to troubleshoot this and if I need to check some more information
Regards,
Sudhanshu BhandariWell, of course, you probably can't eliminate this sort of thing entirely: a setup such as yours is inevitably a compromise. What you can do is make sure your log buffer is a good size (say 10MB or so); that your redo logs are large (at least 100MB each, and preferably large enough to hold one hour or so of redo produced at the busiest time for your database without filling up); and finally set ARCHIVE_LAG_TARGET to something like 1800 seconds or more to ensure a regular, routine, predictable log switch.
It won't cure every ill, but that sort of setup often means the redo subsystem ceases to be a regular driver of foreground waits. -
Statspack: High log file sync timeouts and waits
Hi all,
Please see an extract from our statpack report:
Top 5 Timed Events
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ % Total
Event Waits Time (s) Ela Time
log file sync 349,713 215,674 74.13
db file sequential read 16,955,622 31,342 10.77
CPU time 21,787 7.49
direct path read (lob) 92,762 8,910 3.06
db file scattered read 4,335,034 4,439 1.53
Avg
Total Wait wait Waits
Event Waits Timeouts Time (s) (ms) /txn
log file sync 349,713 150,785 215,674 617 1.8
db file sequential read 16,955,622 0 31,342 2 85.9
I hope the above is readable. I'm concerned with the very high number of Waits and Timeouts, particulary around the log file sync event. From reading around I suspect that the disk our redo log sits on isn't fast enough.
1) Is this conclusion correct, are these timeouts excessively high (70% seems high...)?
2) I see high waits on almost every other event (but not timeouts), is this pointing towards an incorrect database database setup (give our very high loads of 160 executes second?
Any help would be much appreciated.
JonathanTop 5 Timed Events
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ % Total
Event Waits Time (s) Ela Time
log file sync 349,713 215,674 74.13
db file sequential read 16,955,622 31,342 10.77
CPU time 21,787 7.49
direct path read (lob) 92,762 8,910 3.06
db file scattered read 4,335,034 4,439 1.53
Avg
Total Wait wait Waits
Event Waits Timeouts Time (s) (ms) /txn
log file sync 349,713 150,785 215,674 617 1.8
db file sequential read 16,955,622 0 31,342 2 85.9What's the time frame of this report on?
It looks like your disk storage can't keep up with the volume of I/O requests from your database.
The first few thing need to look at, what're IO intensive SQLs in your database. Are these SQLs doing unnecessary full table scan?
Find out the hot blocks and the objects they belong.
Check v$session_wait view.
Is there any other suspicious activity going on in your Server ? Like other program other than Oracle doing high IO activities? Are there any core dump going on? -
I recently purchased a movie (Prometheus) on my computer through iTunes and every time I try to put it on my iPhone, it fails. How can I successfully sync this video? Mind you, every other file syncs flawlessly.
Can you connect to a wifi source on the device? Enable wifi in settings on the device itself. If you don't have wifi at home, there may be a local hotspot you can use for this.
The reason this happens is carriers don't want people downloading huge files that would slow their network as well as eat up your data plan. -
Offline Files sync gives Access Denied on Windows 8.1 Enterprise
A small number of our staff have now been issued with Windows 8.1 Enterprise hybrid tablet computers, however there is a problem with using Offline Files on them - when synchronising, it responds "Access Denied".
The tablets have Windows 8.1 Enterprise with all the latest updates on them. Staff users have a home folder on the network under \\server\staff\homes\departmentname\username which gets mapped to U: and their My Documents is redirected there. The server is currently
Windows Server 2003 R2 SP2.
We have tried:
Resetting the Offline Files cache using the FormatDatabase registry key
Using Group Policy Objects to force Offline Files synchronisation at logon and logoff
Clearing the local cached copy of the user's profile from the machine and getting them to log back on to recreate it
Setting up Offline Files event logging to the event viewer - this provides no useful information as it only logs disconnect/reconnect and logoff/logon events
Forcing Group Policy update using gpupdate /force
Forcing synchronisation using PowerShell and https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/bb309189%28v=vs.85%29.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
As suggested by http://support.microsoft.com/kb/275461 we gave the All Staff security group Read permissions on F:\Staff (which is the one that is shared as \\server\staff) and then blocked inheritance for folders below that
We also checked the following:
The CSC cache has not been relocated
No error 7023 or event 7023 errors relating to Offline Files are present in the event logs
The Offline Files service is running
The OS is already Windows 8.1 Enterprise, so installing the Pro Pack is not applicable
In HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\UserState\UserStateTechnologies\ConfigurationControls all the values are set to 0 and not 1
We do not use System Center Configuration Manager
No errors were found in the Folder Redirection event logs
None of these solved the problem, does anyone have any suggestions?
Here is the error we are seeing:
Thanks,
Dan Jackson (Lead ITServices Technician)
Long Road Sixth Form College
Cambridge, UKHi,
Generally speaking, this problem is most probably occurs at File Server Client.
Firstly, please check the sharing file Sync Settings.
Shared file properties\Sharing\Advanced Sharing\Caching
Also check shared file user list, make sure these problematic user account have full permission.
On the other hand, could you able to access to the shared file directly in Windows Explorer?
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
Yes, the user can access the shared folder in Windows Explorer. The user has the following permissions:
Traverse Folder/Execute File
List Folder/Read Data
Read Attributes
Read Extended Attributes
Create Files/Write Data
Create Folders/Append Data
Write Attributes
Write Extended Attributes
Delete
Read Permissions
Here is a screenshot of how the Caching settings are set up on the top-level Staff share. -
I have gigabytes of Adobe CC files arranged in appropriate client folders in Dropbox (and mirrored on my local hard drive).
It looks like if I turn File Sync on (needed to access Assets) some or all of this will be duplicated and separated from non-Adobe data in each client file.
Messy, unnecessary and 100GB of bandwidth I don't want to pay for! (I'm on 4G so it's expensive.)MichaelGli2,
The Creative Cloud desktop application will only sync files that are in your "Creative Cloud Files" folder on your local machine.
By default, the "Creative Cloud Files" folder is in your user's home folder (/Users/<yourusername>/Creative Cloud Files/ on Mac, or C:\Users\<yourusername>\Creative Cloud Files\ on Windows).
Unless you have deliberately changed the location of your Creative Cloud Files folder yourself so that it is inside your local Dropbox folder, there will be no duplication. -
Metalink note 34592.1 has been mentioned several times in this forum as well as elsewhere, notably here
http://christianbilien.wordpress.com/2008/02/12/the-%E2%80%9Clog-file-sync%E2%80%9D-wait-event-is-not-always-spent-waiting-for-an-io/
The question I have relates to the stated breakdown of 'log file sync' wait event:
1. Wakeup LGWR if idle
2. LGWR gathers the redo to be written and issue the I/O
3. Time for the log write I/O to complete
4. LGWR I/O post processing
5. LGWR posting the foreground/user session that the write has completed
6. Foreground/user session wakeup
Since the note says that the system 'read write' statistic includes steps 2 and 3, the suggestion is that the difference between it and 'log file sync' is due to CPU related work on steps 1, 4, 5 and 6 (or on waiting on the CPU run queue).
Christian's article, quoted above, theorises about 'CPU storms' and the Metalink note also suggests that steps 5 and 6 could be costly.
However, my understanding of how LGWR works is that if it is already in the process of writing out one set of blocks (let us say associated with a commit of transaction 'X' amongst others) at the time a another transaction (call it transaction 'Y') commits, then LGWR will not commence the write of the commit for transaction 'Y' until the I/Os associated with the commit of transaction 'X' complete.
So, if I have an average 'redo write' time of, say, 12ms and a 'log file sync' time of, say 34ms (yes, of course these are real numbers :-)) then I would have thought that this 22ms delay was due at least partly to LGWR 'falling behind' in it's work.
Nonetheless, it seems to me that this extra delay could only be a maximum of 12ms so this still leaves 10ms (34 - 12 -12) that can only be accounted for by CPU usage.
Clearly, my analsys contains a lot of conjecture, hence this note.
Can anybody point me in the direction of some facts?Tony Hasler wrote:
Metalink note 34592.1 has been mentioned several times in this forum as well as elsewhere, notably here
http://christianbilien.wordpress.com/2008/02/12/the-%E2%80%9Clog-file-sync%E2%80%9D-wait-event-is-not-always-spent-waiting-for-an-io/
The question I have relates to the stated breakdown of 'log file sync' wait event:
1. Wakeup LGWR if idle
2. LGWR gathers the redo to be written and issue the I/O
3. Time for the log write I/O to complete
4. LGWR I/O post processing
5. LGWR posting the foreground/user session that the write has completed
6. Foreground/user session wakeup
Since the note says that the system 'read write' statistic includes steps 2 and 3, the suggestion is that the difference between it and 'log file sync' is due to CPU related work on steps 1, 4, 5 and 6 (or on waiting on the CPU run queue).
Christian's article, quoted above, theorises about 'CPU storms' and the Metalink note also suggests that steps 5 and 6 could be costly.
However, my understanding of how LGWR works is that if it is already in the process of writing out one set of blocks (let us say associated with a commit of transaction 'X' amongst others) at the time a another transaction (call it transaction 'Y') commits, then LGWR will not commence the write of the commit for transaction 'Y' until the I/Os associated with the commit of transaction 'X' complete.
So, if I have an average 'redo write' time of, say, 12ms and a 'log file sync' time of, say 34ms (yes, of course these are real numbers :-)) then I would have thought that this 22ms delay was due at least partly to LGWR 'falling behind' in it's work.
Nonetheless, it seems to me that this extra delay could only be a maximum of 12ms so this still leaves 10ms (34 - 12 -12) that can only be accounted for by CPU usage.
Clearly, my analsys contains a lot of conjecture, hence this note.
Can anybody point me in the direction of some facts?It depends on what you mean by facts - presumably only the people who wrote the code know what really happens, the rest of us have to guess.
You're right about point 1 in the MOS note: it should include "or wait for current lgwr write and posts to complete".
This means, of course, that your session could see its "log file sync" taking twice the "redo write time" because it posted lgwr just after lgwr has started to write - so you have to wait two write and post cycles. Generally the statistical effects will reduce this extreme case.
You've been pointed to the two best bits of advice on the internet: As Kevin points out, if you have lgwr posting a lot of processes in one go it may stall as they wake up, so the batch of waiting processes has to wait extra time; and as Riyaj points out - there's always dtrace (et al.) if you want to see what's really happening. (Tanel has some similar notes, I think, on LFS).
If you're stuck with Oracle diagnostics only then:
redo size / redo synch writes for sessions will tell you the typical "commit size"
redo size + redo wastage / redo writes for lgwr will tell you the typical redo write size
If you have a significant number of small processes "commit sizes" per write (more than CPU count, say) then you may be looking at Kevin's storm.
Watch out for a small number of sessions with large commit sizes running in parallel with a large number of sessions with small commit sizes - this could make all the "small" processes run at the speed of the "large" processes.
It's always worth looking at the event histogram for the critical wait events to see if their patterns offer any insights.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis -
Log file sync top event during performance test -av 36ms
Hi,
During the performance test for our product before deployment into product i see "log file sync" on top with Avg wait (ms) being 36 which i feel is too high.
Avg
wait % DB
Event Waits Time(s) (ms) time Wait Class
log file sync 208,327 7,406 36 46.6 Commit
direct path write 646,833 3,604 6 22.7 User I/O
DB CPU 1,599 10.1
direct path read temp 1,321,596 619 0 3.9 User I/O
log buffer space 4,161 558 134 3.5 ConfiguratAlthough testers are not complaining about the performance of the appplication , we ,DBAs, are expected to be proactive about the any bad signals from DB.
I am not able to figure out why "log file sync" is having such slow response.
Below is the snapshot from the load profile.
Snap Id Snap Time Sessions Curs/Sess
Begin Snap: 108127 16-May-13 20:15:22 105 6.5
End Snap: 108140 16-May-13 23:30:29 156 8.9
Elapsed: 195.11 (mins)
DB Time: 265.09 (mins)
Cache Sizes Begin End
~~~~~~~~~~~ ---------- ----------
Buffer Cache: 1,168M 1,136M Std Block Size: 8K
Shared Pool Size: 1,120M 1,168M Log Buffer: 16,640K
Load Profile Per Second Per Transaction Per Exec Per Call
~~~~~~~~~~~~ --------------- --------------- ---------- ----------
DB Time(s): 1.4 0.1 0.02 0.01
DB CPU(s): 0.1 0.0 0.00 0.00
Redo size: 607,512.1 33,092.1
Logical reads: 3,900.4 212.5
Block changes: 1,381.4 75.3
Physical reads: 134.5 7.3
Physical writes: 134.0 7.3
User calls: 145.5 7.9
Parses: 24.6 1.3
Hard parses: 7.9 0.4
W/A MB processed: 915,418.7 49,864.2
Logons: 0.1 0.0
Executes: 85.2 4.6
Rollbacks: 0.0 0.0
Transactions: 18.4Some of the top background wait events:
^LBackground Wait Events DB/Inst: Snaps: 108127-108140
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait Waits % bg
Event Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) /txn time
log file parallel write 208,563 0 2,528 12 1.0 66.4
db file parallel write 4,264 0 785 184 0.0 20.6
Backup: sbtbackup 1 0 516 516177 0.0 13.6
control file parallel writ 4,436 0 97 22 0.0 2.6
log file sequential read 6,922 0 95 14 0.0 2.5
Log archive I/O 6,820 0 48 7 0.0 1.3
os thread startup 432 0 26 60 0.0 .7
Backup: sbtclose2 1 0 10 10094 0.0 .3
db file sequential read 2,585 0 8 3 0.0 .2
db file single write 560 0 3 6 0.0 .1
log file sync 28 0 1 53 0.0 .0
control file sequential re 36,326 0 1 0 0.2 .0
log file switch completion 4 0 1 207 0.0 .0
buffer busy waits 5 0 1 116 0.0 .0
LGWR wait for redo copy 924 0 1 1 0.0 .0
log file single write 56 0 1 9 0.0 .0
Backup: sbtinfo2 1 0 1 500 0.0 .0During a previous perf test , things didnt look this bad for "log file sync. Few sections from the comparision report(awrddprt.sql)
{code}
Workload Comparison
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1st Per Sec 2nd Per Sec %Diff 1st Per Txn 2nd Per Txn %Diff
DB time: 0.78 1.36 74.36 0.02 0.07 250.00
CPU time: 0.18 0.14 -22.22 0.00 0.01 100.00
Redo size: 573,678.11 607,512.05 5.90 15,101.84 33,092.08 119.13
Logical reads: 4,374.04 3,900.38 -10.83 115.14 212.46 84.52
Block changes: 1,593.38 1,381.41 -13.30 41.95 75.25 79.38
Physical reads: 76.44 134.54 76.01 2.01 7.33 264.68
Physical writes: 110.43 134.00 21.34 2.91 7.30 150.86
User calls: 197.62 145.46 -26.39 5.20 7.92 52.31
Parses: 7.28 24.55 237.23 0.19 1.34 605.26
Hard parses: 0.00 7.88 100.00 0.00 0.43 100.00
Sorts: 3.88 4.90 26.29 0.10 0.27 170.00
Logons: 0.09 0.08 -11.11 0.00 0.00 0.00
Executes: 126.69 85.19 -32.76 3.34 4.64 38.92
Transactions: 37.99 18.36 -51.67
First Second Diff
1st 2nd
Event Wait Class Waits Time(s) Avg Time(ms) %DB time Event Wait Class Waits Time(s) Avg Time
(ms) %DB time
SQL*Net more data from client Network 2,133,486 1,270.7 0.6 61.24 log file sync Commit 208,355 7,407.6
35.6 46.57
CPU time N/A 487.1 N/A 23.48 direct path write User I/O 646,849 3,604.7
5.6 22.66
log file sync Commit 99,459 129.5 1.3 6.24 log file parallel write System I/O 208,564 2,528.4
12.1 15.90
log file parallel write System I/O 100,732 126.6 1.3 6.10 CPU time N/A 1,599.3
N/A 10.06
SQL*Net more data to client Network 451,810 103.1 0.2 4.97 db file parallel write System I/O 4,264 784.7 1
84.0 4.93
-direct path write User I/O 121,044 52.5 0.4 2.53 -SQL*Net more data from client Network 7,407,435 279.7
0.0 1.76
-db file parallel write System I/O 986 22.8 23.1 1.10 -SQL*Net more data to client Network 2,714,916 64.6
0.0 0.41
{code}
*To sum it sup:
1. Why is the IO response getting such an hit during the new perf test? Please suggest*
2. Does the number of DB writer impact "log file sync" wait event? We have only one DB writer as the number of cpu on the host is only 4
{code}
select *from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
CORE 11.1.0.7.0 Production
TNS for HPUX: Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
{code}
Please let me know if you would like to see any other stats.
Edited by: Kunwar on May 18, 2013 2:20 PM1. A snapshot interval of 3 hours always generates meaningless results
Below are some details from the 1 hour interval AWR report.
Platform CPUs Cores Sockets Memory(GB)
HP-UX IA (64-bit) 4 4 3 31.95
Snap Id Snap Time Sessions Curs/Sess
Begin Snap: 108129 16-May-13 20:45:32 140 8.0
End Snap: 108133 16-May-13 21:45:53 150 8.8
Elapsed: 60.35 (mins)
DB Time: 140.49 (mins)
Cache Sizes Begin End
~~~~~~~~~~~ ---------- ----------
Buffer Cache: 1,168M 1,168M Std Block Size: 8K
Shared Pool Size: 1,120M 1,120M Log Buffer: 16,640K
Load Profile Per Second Per Transaction Per Exec Per Call
~~~~~~~~~~~~ --------------- --------------- ---------- ----------
DB Time(s): 2.3 0.1 0.03 0.01
DB CPU(s): 0.1 0.0 0.00 0.00
Redo size: 719,553.5 34,374.6
Logical reads: 4,017.4 191.9
Block changes: 1,521.1 72.7
Physical reads: 136.9 6.5
Physical writes: 158.3 7.6
User calls: 167.0 8.0
Parses: 25.8 1.2
Hard parses: 8.9 0.4
W/A MB processed: 406,220.0 19,406.0
Logons: 0.1 0.0
Executes: 88.4 4.2
Rollbacks: 0.0 0.0
Transactions: 20.9
Top 5 Timed Foreground Events
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Avg
wait % DB
Event Waits Time(s) (ms) time Wait Class
log file sync 73,761 6,740 91 80.0 Commit
log buffer space 3,581 541 151 6.4 Configurat
DB CPU 348 4.1
direct path write 238,962 241 1 2.9 User I/O
direct path read temp 487,874 174 0 2.1 User I/O
Background Wait Events DB/Inst: Snaps: 108129-108133
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait Waits % bg
Event Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) /txn time
log file parallel write 61,049 0 1,891 31 0.8 87.8
db file parallel write 1,590 0 251 158 0.0 11.6
control file parallel writ 1,372 0 56 41 0.0 2.6
log file sequential read 2,473 0 50 20 0.0 2.3
Log archive I/O 2,436 0 20 8 0.0 .9
os thread startup 135 0 8 60 0.0 .4
db file sequential read 668 0 4 6 0.0 .2
db file single write 200 0 2 9 0.0 .1
log file sync 8 0 1 152 0.0 .1
log file single write 20 0 0 21 0.0 .0
control file sequential re 11,218 0 0 0 0.1 .0
buffer busy waits 2 0 0 161 0.0 .0
direct path write 6 0 0 37 0.0 .0
LGWR wait for redo copy 380 0 0 0 0.0 .0
log buffer space 1 0 0 89 0.0 .0
latch: cache buffers lru c 3 0 0 1 0.0 .0 2 The log file sync is a result of commit --> you are committing too often, maybe even every individual record.
Thanks for explanation. +Actually my question is WHY is it so slow (avg wait of 91ms)+3 Your IO subsystem hosting the online redo log files can be a limiting factor.
We don't know anything about your online redo log configuration
Below is my redo log configuration.
GROUP# STATUS TYPE MEMBER IS_
1 ONLINE /oradata/fs01/PERFDB1/redo_1a.log NO
1 ONLINE /oradata/fs02/PERFDB1/redo_1b.log NO
2 ONLINE /oradata/fs01/PERFDB1/redo_2a.log NO
2 ONLINE /oradata/fs02/PERFDB1/redo_2b.log NO
3 ONLINE /oradata/fs01/PERFDB1/redo_3a.log NO
3 ONLINE /oradata/fs02/PERFDB1/redo_3b.log NO
6 rows selected.
04:13:14 perf_monitor@PERFDB1> col FIRST_CHANGE# for 999999999999999999
04:13:26 perf_monitor@PERFDB1> select *from v$log;
GROUP# THREAD# SEQUENCE# BYTES MEMBERS ARC STATUS FIRST_CHANGE# FIRST_TIME
1 1 40689 524288000 2 YES INACTIVE 13026185905545 18-MAY-13 01:00
2 1 40690 524288000 2 YES INACTIVE 13026185931010 18-MAY-13 03:32
3 1 40691 524288000 2 NO CURRENT 13026185933550 18-MAY-13 04:00Edited by: Kunwar on May 18, 2013 2:46 PM -
Unable to launch File sync and to update Adobe Exchange panel in Illustrator CC 2014
I suppose that these two problems might be related, as I need the file sync to sync the extensions?
Anyway, I’m unable to launch a file sync, and when I update the Adobe Exchange panel in Illustrator, it asks for a reboot, and after the reboot, it asks again for an update…
Thanks for the help!I've since received information of a workaround - listed in a different thread: Unable to install non-standard updates - Cannot launch/update Adobe Digital Publishing for InDesign CC 2014
Try the following to enable updates:
1) Navigate to C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Adobe\AAMUpdaterInventory\1.0 and you will find a .dat file ( AdobeUpdaterAdminPrefs.dat).
2) Please open the file in question and you will find a line item : <Suppressed>1</Suppressed> .
3) Please change the Value from 1 to 0 and save the file back in the same location.
On a Mac, essentially the same, however location: /Library/Application Support/Adobe/AAMUpdaterInventory/1.0/AdobeUpdaterAdminPrefs.dat
I was given further advice that DPS toolkit updates are not available when you create the deployment package from Adobe Application Manager Enterprise Edition on Mac OS. (I believe this may be the same using Creative Cloud Packager as you've found)
Deployment DPS Toolkit Update| AAMEE |Mac OS
The above article suggests that you can download and install the DPS update silently, however, an end user must be logged into computer - not really feasible for enterprise environments.
So I guess the process for this would be:
1)Copy the contents of the DPS update package to remote machine
2)Enable updates by modifying the AdobeUpdaterAdminPrefs.dat file
3)Remotely launch the DPS update silently (when someone is logged onto machine)
4)Disable updates again when complete... -
Why can't I use the creative cloud connection file syncing?
I hear people raving about it on twitter, so why am I only seeing a 'coming soon' message in the files tab of my creative cloud interface? I would very much like to use the file syncing to work between two computers! What is going on here? Is there some kind of area restriction going on for this service?
Sign up for early access to File and Font Syncing. It's being rolled out slowly to work out the early glitches:
http://blogs.adobe.com/creativecloud/file-and-typekit-font-sync-rolling-out/
Maybe you are looking for
-
Help! iPod Touch 5th gen. It worked fine earlier today, I was using it with no issues. I just picked it up to use it again and it's dead...nothing happens when I try to restart/shut off. I plugged it into my PC and nothing happens, my pc doesn't ackn
-
ITunes crashes every time I click on 'Get Info' for a file.
How do I fix it? Could there be some kind of index or something else that needs to be rebuilt. I have a very large library with 14000 songs and a few movies. I'm running iTunes version 10.1.6 (7). Thanks.
-
JCo & qRFC / IDOC_INBOUND_IN_QUEUE Error
Hello everybody, I have a java based server application, transporting IDocs between MES + SAP ERP. Till now I used tRFC for transfering IDocs from SAP to my server application. at the moment I'm checking out, how to use qRFC with my application. I ch
-
Hi, I am an student completed Oracle DBA working in small firm as Junior Oracle DBA. I got an error ORA-1221 can you please send me the details description how to correct this problem.
-
Spotify, Windows 8.1 - Suddenly no sound and spotify is not useable.
Hello So I just recently reinstalled Windows 8.1 on my computer, because I had some problems with it. Everything works fine now, except Spotify. I didn't use to have any problems with it and it played tracks and albums smooth. Now suddenly when I ins