PC WF - Agent Determination for Items with Multiple Account Assignment

Hello Gurus!
The quoted text below is from [SAP Help Documentation|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm70/helpdata/en/ad/d8fd25beb64bbe9d671f3199eb7edf/content.htm]. I haven't been able to find any further documentation on how to implement this feature. Is this something the system can do without any BAdI implementations? Has anybody implemented this? How can this be accomplished? We are on SRM 7.0.
"You can distribute costs across accounts by percentage, by quantity, or by value. If the responsibility for approving items according to given accounting data is divided between several approvers, the system can create one work item for each approver. The item can only receive the status Approved after each approver has approved it. As soon as one approver rejects an item, the item receives the status Rejected."
Regards,
Ramki.

Hi,
   SAP does not provide the standard Badi implementation to achieve your business requirement.. but you can refer enhancement implementation /SAPSRM/BD_WF_AGENTS_SC where you can find badi implementation /SAPSRM/BD_WF_SC_RR_PGRP is similar..
Saravanan

Similar Messages

  • GR Printing For Single Line Item With Multiple Account Assignment.

    Hi All,
    There is PO for projects (Account Assignment -P - Network) in which in a single item consist of multiple account assignment.
    Noe while entering the GR I select "Collective Slip" option but when the GR is posted system automatically select option "Individual slip" and seprate line item are printed for each account assignment.
    The printing program is standard SAPM07DR. The SAP version is 4.7. Can anyone tell what is ther any setting in configuration or is it problem in program or smart form
    Thanks & Regards,
    Omkar

    hi
    please check your form and routine used to print.

  • Undeleting a PO line item with multiple account assignment and PO history

    I  am getting error message
    PO history already exists (Multiple account assignment not possible)
        Message no. MEPO841
    When attempting to undelete a purchase order line item that has GR (nonvaluated) and Invoice postings.
    Sequence of events.
    PO line item was created with mutlitple account assignments ( 50/50 distribution) and GR nonval flags on.
    Invoice Posted (blocked for payment)
    GR done
    PO line item marked for deletion.
    Now getting MEPO841 when attempting to undelete.
    Tried to Reverse GR and cancel material docuement - unable to do so - message no selectable items in PO
      (even with check zero indicator )

    Hello Dan ,
    Error message MEPO 841 is only issued if you have Multiple account assignment function (MAA) activated. Multiple account assignment function is a new business function developed in Release 604.
    If you have MAA active, you are not allowed to change a single account assigned PO which has GR posted to a multiple accounts assigned PO. If this is tried , MEPO 841 will stop you from doing this change.
    If you want to have your old functionality in the lower release, you should switch off the business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 ( MM Multiple Account Assignment )  in Release 604.
    Please switch the business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 off in test environment  and test the problem again in a productive system.
    I hope this information has been helpful in solving your problem. Please let me know if you have any further questions.
    Thank you.
    Best Regards,
    Frank Farinella

  • Partial invoice with multiple account assignment

    I'm using PO with multiple account assignment with distribution by percentage and proportional distribution for partial invoice.
    When i post invoice verification for this kind of orders the amount and quantity field in PO item are closed for update and no automatic proportional distribution has been performed.
    The only possibility to update amount in case of partial invoice is to update amount of each account assignment manually (using account assignment button).
    Why the amount and quantity fields are closed for update?
    How i can post partial invoice for multiple account assignment order without manual distribution of changed amounts among different account assignments items?
    Thanks in advance.

    Thanks Charlie.
    I am aware of that. But do we have that "partial invoice" field where we can select teh distribution as proportionate or sequence.
    My POs item are having around 30 to 45 account assignments. In that case it is not possible to manual distribute the amount.
    Please advise.
    Thanks,

  • Services with multiple account assignment.

    Hi all,
    How can I find out the POs which are having the multiple account assignment for the service line items from tables ?
    I am looking for services with multiple account assignments
    Regards

    Hi
    Go to SE16 , give table name -EKPO
    Now if you have purchase order nos with you then copy paste the PO numbers here , or select company code or site to restrict your entries. It will control the performance of the data execution.
    Then execute this (remove max no 200 ) . Go to Settings-- Format List -- Choose fields. Deselect all and select fields as per your requirement.If field names are coming in technical names you can change this via settings--User parameter and select -Field Label.
    You can extract this report to excel as well. Same PO number with all account assignment category.
    Please note if you have high volume of data then extract all the POs under service orders first from EKKO table and copy all the service PO numbers availbvale and paste in table EKPO, it will increase performance as well.
    Cheers
    Mukta

  • Asset PO with Multiple account assignment..!!!

    Hi all ,
    i am creating asset PO with multiple account assignment and having pricing condition 5.5% Octroi..
    While doing the MIRO , system should distrubuted octorie amount  to all the assets ( load to asset value )
    But system is not capture the octorie amount in MIRO...
    Any customization required for multiple account assignment in case of Asset PO ..??
    Please help.

    Hi,
    In MIRO, item detail screen, you check for a button which allows apportionment of the value.
    Regards
    Aloysius

  • PO Error in Process with Multiple account assignment

    Hi ,
    I am working with Extended Classsic scenario.
    Problem is with PO with Multiple account assignement.
    There is only one user who is getting problem with one particular account assignement "CCC" - Cost Center RP.. . When PO gets created with this particular AAC , it goes into "Error in process" only for one user.
    In RZ20 it shows messsage as "Please enter quantity or percentage for account assignment" & "Distr. ind. and partial invoice ind. must be set f or multi acct. assgt.".
    On other hand , other users are able to order the PO with the same AAC without any error.
    What could be the reason behind this only for one user ?
    Regards,
    Sheetal

    Hi ,
    I have checked it intially and both are identical.
    Initialy the problem was, user had entered 128 times AA line items  ( added & deleted ) in the PO while in the SC it was having only 64.... Our system accepts line items till 99 , so i asked him to delete the items above 99 ..
    So after that POs error has gone and it went for approval..
    But after approval it again went into error in process
    Sheetal

  • GR Non-Valuated  with multiple account assignment

    Hi, gurus;
    some knows a user exit or badi that is used to undercheck the flag GR Non-valuated when PO with multiple account assignment is created (ME21N) ? It can have some consequence in later invoice verification?
    Thanks in advance
    R.Z.

    gr non valuated is done in case ur procuring the material for direct consumption so at the time of gr no posting to accounts occur but at the time of invoice recipet the system debits the g/l account and crdits the vendor account 
    this multiple account ***. is also necessary to mark with gr non valuated and gr check box so that u can change the account assignment at the time of invoice and that acc. assg. should also be changebale in backend .

  • Limti PO with Multiple account assignment Problem

    Hi,
    Can we create limit PO with Multiple account assignment.
    If yes, i have issue with commitment distribution for all the account assignment. when i post service entry sheet the value is posting for only first one cost centre/Order but not all.
    So in the purchase order for the remaining account assignment commitment remain left.
    Reagrds,
    JM

    Hi Summer,
    We have implemented SAP Note 1165524 for multiple account assignment as suggested, and it is working fine for New POs.
    But we have old Purchase order which still have wrong commitment, and GR and IR are already posted for this PO, we have to reduce the commitment to Zero.
    there is one solution for this is set  'No further Invoice expected' check box selected in this PO, but in our case PO  went into error in process after doing this.
    Please help me to reduce commitment to zero for this old PO
    Thanks in advance
    Vikas

  • PO with multiple account assignment

    Hi Experts,
    While creating PO for multiple account assignment system is automatically picking 'GR Non-Valuated' check box.After doing a GR no accouning document generated.
    How is the goods receipt valuated for a purchase order with multiple account assignment?
    Please explain.
    Thanks,
    Sanjana

    Hi,
    It is possible to create PO with multiple account assignment,but you will not get accounting document at the time of GR.it will happen at the time of MIRO,as i have allready explained.
    If you will create PO with multiple account assignment for Services,System will generate Accounting document at the time of GR.
    I hope it will clerify.
    Regards,
    Manish

  • BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE with Multiple Account Assignment

    Hi, Does anyone have an example code of this function with multiple account assigment values
    Or suggestions to implement this FM
    I´m beginner in abap
    Thanks
    <REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
    Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Apr 14, 2008 12:47 PM

    Hi, I saw that function,does anyone have a z program using this bapi
    with  Multiple Account Assignment structure
    thanks

  • Value mismatch in ME23N and MIRO for PO with multiple account assignments

    Hello All,
    I've a PO for indriect material procurement with no material master and I've a single PO item with Account Assignment Category as "K" (Cost Center) and Net Price as "1,357.91". Account Assignment has been distributed by percentage such that 50% goes to a cost center and the remaining 50% goes to another cost center.
    When I do MIRO, the amount comes as "1.357,92". This is because, the actual PO price "1,357.91" is divided by 2 equal half due to multiple account assignment and the individual amount comes to 678.955. And this is rounded off to 678.96 and multiplied by 2 in MIRO and the final amount comes to "1357.92". So as you see, the variance between PO price and MIRO price is 0.01.
    How to get rid of this variance? Can something be done to match the PO value and MIRO value the same?
    Thanks for your inputs.
    Sankar

    HI Sankar,
    This is a standard behaviour as Currencies with 2 decimals will be getting rounded off. One work around to avoid posting of Small differences in Invoices (DIF accounts) is to maually change the amount in the Account assignment in the Invoice line to match to PO line total.
    Regards,
    Kathir

  • Non valuated Goods Receipt for materials with multiple account assignments

    We have been using multiple a/c assignments for services on purchase orders for sometime with no issues.  Recently we used a multiple a/c assignment distribution for a material P/O.  this didn't work the same and the Goods Receipt was set as non valuated.
    This leaves the cost showing as a commitment and we do not get any actual costs charged at the GR point until we get and post the invoice.  This only happens with multiple account assignments, all material P/O goods receipts for single assignments get valuated.
    Were not sure why this happens, and want it treated the same.  Is there any way we can get these valuated the same way single assignment materials or multi assignment services are.
    The non valuated GR flag is getting set automatically, but we can't see where this is coming from for this scenario, so were a bit stuck.
    Any advice/direction would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Graham

    Hi Deshamol, No the materials are all valuated, as mentioned, they all work fine when used as single a/c assignment.
    Anupam, Your answer doesn't make sense to me, this is 1 line on the P/O, therefore 1 material.  It can't be both valuated and none valuated for each a/c assignment. 
    I have read in a note there there is a business function that you can apply to get this working, has anybody tried it?
    Thanks
    Graham

  • Invoice transport costs with multiple account assignment

    Hello Gurus,
    My problem is the following:
    1) I create two sales orders with the same forwarding agent "A"
    2) I create the two deliveries with the forwarding agent "A"
    3) I create a transport for those two deliveries and the same forwarding agent A
    4) I create the shipment cost for that transport.
    So now we have the situation:
    2 orders --> 2 deliveries --> 1 transport --> 1 shipment cost
    when i go to transaction MIRO and I enter the delivery note number I get one line item with the total transport cost.
    If I click on the option "Multiple account assignment" I get a breakdown of all the amounts but I can not see which costs refers to which delivery.
    My question is: Is there any way I can link the amount to the delivery number or at least to identify which cost is linked to which delivery number?
    Thanks a lot in advance,
    Miguel

    gr non valuated is done in case ur procuring the material for direct consumption so at the time of gr no posting to accounts occur but at the time of invoice recipet the system debits the g/l account and crdits the vendor account 
    this multiple account ***. is also necessary to mark with gr non valuated and gr check box so that u can change the account assignment at the time of invoice and that acc. assg. should also be changebale in backend .

  • Down payment with multiple account assignment PO

    Dear Experts,
    While posting down payment request through transaction F -47 with
    reference to purchase order we are getting below given error.
    In that purchase order we have given
    multiple account assignment i.e. multiple cost centers (e.g. Cost center A  50% cost center B 10% Cost Center  C 40% i.e. distribution by %)
    but
    system is flagging message
    Item 00010 of purch. document 4500024875 contains no suitable account
    assignment
    Message no. ME717
    What will be the possible cause?
    regards,
    Abhijit

    Hi,
    In the request f-27 tr.code give the purchase order which item you want to give ie., for above said example 10 is a line item of 4500024875 - purchase order and beside you have to mention
    10(lineitem) 4500024875 (purchase order) 2009 (year)
    and system will take that request against the above purchase order.
    Regards,
    satish

Maybe you are looking for

  • Is there any way to print  the data inside  the Notes field of MIR6 Report

    Hello Gurús. We need to include the data inside the Notes field in the report MIR6 - INVOICE OVERVIEW - report. Is there any way to print  the data inside (comments)  the Notes field as well in the Report  ? We found that the only way is to open the

  • How to diagnose a broken 30 pin dock connector?

    Is there a "diagnostic" application to determine if my Iphone 4 - 30 pin dock connector is fully functional? BTW - all lint and dirt has been removed (delicately). This iPhone has been able to perform TV/video out and mirror display with a (still) fu

  • Materialized View Log not empty

    Hello all I have an oracle database (11g version), connecting via dbLink to another DB (10g version), and using it's tables as masters for fast refresh materialized views. To make it simple: I have master DB, with master table X, and Materialized Vie

  • AQ Adapter correlation

    Hi, Is there any parameter that gets automatically set at the BPEL process instance level when the process is activated by a AQ partnerlink (such as conversation ID , Instance ID) ? Is it possible to declaratively indicate one of the parameters to be

  • Import images WITHOUT any IPTC metadata

    I've been racking by brain trying to work out how to do this, but cannot find a way, I'm sure it's something simple. When I import my files the keywords are always imported and put into the top of the keyword directory instead of nested in folders I