PCA - Quantity Allocation structure

Hi,
Could u tel me PCA wise quantity allocatation, if it is possible what are the steps i need to follow. our main requrement is PCA wise balance sheet and client want to see stock as well as values and second point client having a manufacturing palnts on different location ..single sales point .so any difference / scrap / shortage are found to be allocate pca wise.
Regards.
Vinu.

Similar Messages

Assignment under Allocation Structure.

Hi SAP Gurus,
I would like to know the functionality of Assignment under allocation structure. Let us consider one ex:, I have 10 accounts (cost elements) and I divided those into 2 groups. I considered one group under one assignment and another group under another assignment.
I want to settle expenditure related to first group to one g/l account and another group expenditure to another g/l account. I don't want to consider % in settlement rule.
In that case, how I have to proceed, please let me know at the earliest.
Regards.

Hi Raman ,
Cost Center Accounting , Profit Center Accounting and COPA Reporting are all distincts .
Cost Center Accounting cycles ( assessment and distribution) will not effect Profit Center Accounting ..
Wether you use Assessment or Distribution in cost center accounting will deciede upon what costs are there is your sender cost centers. If you have only primary costs ( from 1-2 GL A/c) only.. then use distribution otheriwse you have to use CCA assessment cycles..
For COPA Assessment cycles.. source and asessment cycle ... must be different in order to trace the costs later on ...
Your Design must be
1. Assessment/Distribution cycle to transfer the costs from pool CC to down CC
2. COPA assessment cycle sto transfer the Costs to COPA .
3. PCA cycles to distribute between profit centers .. to have profit center reports..
Please revert back for any further clarifications
Regards
Sarada

How to remove overlap of cost element in allocation structure?

hi experts,
on KSES the source has double entry of cost element. those cost elements were defined under cost element group. when i checked on the Source screen the entries under the cost element group there is no double entry but when checked on Extras > Overview List i can see two entries of the cost element. how can i remove on the double entry of cost element on the source of the allocation structure?
thanks!

Hi,
Go to KAH2 . enter cost element group.
Select the cost element to be deleted , then select arrow (upwars left , 3rd button from top left) , right click and then remove.
Regards,
Mrinal

Message no. KD503 - Complete allocation structure K1 for Internal Order

Hi,
During Internal order settlement through KO88 I am getting this error as :
Message no. KD503 - Complete allocation structure K1
Diagnosis :
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters). Cost element 430500 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure K1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure :
    Possible solutions are as follows:
    o   If the posting under cost element 430500 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
    o   If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose
    "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure. If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
-   You can update allocation structure K1
The same configuration in Development Server there is no error but problem occurs in Quality server. Here the process is Internal Order creation - Creation of Reservation through MB21- Goods Issue against reservation through MB1A and finally settlement through KO88. During settlement this error occur. In configuration setting of allocation structure under Internal Order I have mentioned only revenue settlement (as per business) against assignments. Under source mentioned cost element group and under settlement cost elment Receiver Cat is "CTR" and tick "By Cost Element".
During MB1A i.e, goods issue accounting entry is generated as
81(Dr). 430500 Constimptuion Saprae and Stores
99(Cr). 310411 Inventory Machinery and Spare.
During settlement this debit figure should credit. But not allowiing to credit. Even in configuration under settlement cost element if I remove the tick of "By cost element" and mention secondary gl account whose cost element category is 21, still showing the same error in QA server. What may be the probabale solution ? Even if i remove allocation structure K1 from settlement profile 20 still same error exist. How this link gets during settlment inspite of removing allocation structure from settlement profile...
NB.. COPA is not implemented in our company. So PA structure should not arrise here....
Thanks & regards,
Samrat
Edited by: Samrat Roy on Aug 30, 2010 7:28 PM

Hi Samrat,
The issue is very simple.. Cost element 430500 is posted in your IO...
While settling you have 2 options... Either you can credit the original GL account 430500.. This happens when you tick "By Cost element".. This you have done already...
2nd option is not to tick "By Cost element" and assign a secondary cost ele category 21...
But for any of these options to work, you have to include GL 430500 in the "source"... The above 2 options apply only to those GL accounts which are mentioned in the "Source".... for rest of the GL accounts, system gives this error
Include 430500 in your "source" cost ele group.. Error will be resolved
Regards
Ajay M

Error : complete allocation structure while doing Ko88 settlement.

Message no. KD503
Diagnosis
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
Cost element S10100 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure A2, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure
Possible solutions are as follows:
If the posting under cost element S10100 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.
If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
You can update allocation structure A2

Dear,
Please refer my reply in this thread,
Error in Rework order settlement
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

While Doing Production Order Settlement "Complete Allocation structure" :

Dear Experts
I am Getting This Problem ,
please give me A suitable Solution.
I am created Another Allocation Structure And Assigned to Settllement Profile . But it is not trigering. Not Capturing That allocation
Complete allocation structure Z1
Message no. KD503
Diagnosis
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
Cost element 40512006 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure Z1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure
Possible solutions are as follows:
u2022 If the posting under cost element 40512006 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
Edited by: rajamallu on Jul 2, 2010 10:41 AM

Hi,
within allocation structure customizing you create assignments for allocation structure Z1.
Each assignment has a source (cost element, cost element range, cost element group).
The cost element 40512006 is not included in the source definition of allocation structure Z1 but there are values to be settled available on your sender.
Thus they cannot be settled and thats why the message occurs. So maintain alloc. structure Z1 completely.
Best regards, Christian

What command would you use to check for allocation, structural, or logical integrity problems?

What command would you use to check for allocation, structural, or logical integrity problems?

Wondering if you are looking for DBCC CHECKDB command? For more information, on that command, try to look at this:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms176064.aspx

Enter an existing allocation structure - Message No: KD013

Hi Experts,
While creating the Internal Order I am getting below error. We are using SAP from last 7 years with same Internal Order Types
Enter an existing allocation structure
Message no. KD013
Diagnosis
You have entered a settlement structure which does not exist.
Procedure
Enter an existing settlement structure or define a new one in the implementation guide.

thanks for your quick reply.
I find out the solution.
T.CODE: OKO6
SPRO - Controlling - Internal Orders - Actual Postings - Settlement - Maintain Allocation Structures
We have maintained Allocation Structure which we have assigned in Order Types.
T.CODE: KOAL
Thanks & Regards,
Vijay

Allocation Structure, Settlement issue

Dear All,
I have created a Allocation Structure with following details:
Allocation Structure: XX
Assignment: 01, 02, 03...
Co AREA: YYYY
In Source: I assigned relevant Cosat element groups
In Settelment Cost Elements: I assigned Secondary Cost elements
I have maintained the Settlement rule to settle WBS to CTR in CJ20N.
I have also checked that Allocation Structure XX is comming in Settlement paramters in the WBS (CJ20N)
After few postings on WBS element i get an error "Maintain sources for allocation structure A1 (this is pointing to a different allocation structure) in controlling area YYYY"
Ques 1: Is there any other config to be maintained required to Settle the Project to CTR.
Ques 2: In the settlement Profile what Document type i need to maintain?? Is this mandatory?
Ques 3: Is it must to create a source structure?
Warm Regards,
Jatinder

Dear Gokul,
Yes this is newly configured allocation structure.
I have created a new settlement profile (where i have also assigned the new allocation structure) and assigned the Project profile.
Regards,
Jatinder

WBS settlement issue:Complete allocation structure A1.Message no. KD503

hi all
I created an WBS 600041 and through FB60 posted the JV by assigning the WBS 600041.
Then I saw in CJI3 the posting is done and it is showing there and I created a settlement rule and gave the 100 % cost settlement on AUC and saved it. Now when I go to CJ88 and do the actual settlement and gave all the parameters for full settlement and execute it is giving the following error
Complete allocation structure A1.Message no. KD503
Is this problem due to cost elements? How do I go about it.please suggest.
kind regards
Aman

HI,
Check your allocation structure OKO6 transaction. see whether your allocation structure is having the expense cost element you posted listed in it
OKO6- select your allocation structure-Assignments-source
Here the GL account should be listed
Regards,
Radha

Quantity Allocation

Hi,
We are in the process of finalizing our blue print,Need more
clarification on the "Procurement Quantity Allocation". It has been
identified as not a standard feature of SAP,would like to know the
possibilities from experts.
Our core business falls in the category of tyres trading,facing a problem in
allcating quantities since supply is less than demand. As a business
practice our procurement department collect the orders from all the
sales man every month,consolidate it as a single order and pass it on
to supplier.Our lead time is normally 90 days from the date of order .
The same practice will be followed every month. Supplier will come back
to us based on the availability and many times the quantities are less
than requested. We need to allocate this quantity to various salesman
based on various factors and make sure that this is the qty available
for him for the 4 th month(if we are ordering in November it is for
march month sales).
If this practice is not followed strictly , many times the person
requested the quantity will not be getting his allotment since the
sames is already booked by the other sales persons.
Either the person who has ordered is not selling it ends up in
increase of stock or the person who has not ordered selling it with out
allotment.
We expect our system will be accessed from more than 15 countries
it is not practially possible to control it manually. Would like to
hear it from you how the same business process can be mapped into SAP
and controlled effectively. The following depicts step wise details
1) Purchase requisition from multiple Sales man
2) Consolidated as a single RFQ and pass it on to supplier
3) Based on qty allocation from supplier allocate it to multiple
sales man
4) Send P.O to supplier and follow up with shipments
5) When the sales people are trying to book Sales order against the
pending P.O control it from allocation
Thanking You
Karuna

Hi,
This is possible in standard SAP via Product Allocation settings.
Regards,
Shailendra

Manual quantity allocation per sales order

Hi All,
The requirement is as follows.
My client want users to allocate quantity for sales order manually so that they can control quantity allocation for sales orders when there is shortage of stock.
We do not want to use product allocation for this, So can anyone suggest if there is any other way to allocate the stock manually for sales order.
Thanks in advance,
JM

Hi,
This can be acheived by enhancement.
You can use userexit MV45AFZB -userexit_source_determination for this.
You need to maintain the Z-table for all the bottleneck material with confirmation quatity column.
So everytime when you create a sale order for bottleneck material, system will check this table & irrespective of any order quantity, it will confirm the quantities mentioned in the table.
This way you can maintain the logic & fullfil the above requirement
thank you

Allocation Structure

Hi,
When we execute the T.code KO88(Order Settlement for AUC), showing the below Error Message.
Complete allocation structure A1
Message no. KD503
Diagnosis
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
Cost element 410006 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure A1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure
Possible solutions are as follows:
If the posting under cost element 410006 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.
If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
You can update allocation structure A1
We have assigned Cost element for Receiver Cat. FXA.
What is the Problem?
Thanks in advance

In the allocation structure you need to include the source CE 410006.
Allocation Structure>Assignments (double click)>Source (double click)
Here in source you should have the CE mention in From else you should have created a CE group including this CE.
And now for this source ensure you've maintained the Settlement cost element (for FXA) either 'By Cost Element' or Settlement cost element.
Regards
Sreenivas

Pa allocation structure for pm orders

hi fico experts,
can any one tell us how to configure the pa allocation structure for pm orders for revenues billing thru dip profile use for service orders.
pl help
thanx in advance
regards
srihari

hi
I need to post to COPA at the time of settlement of PM order thru KO88 with multiple order line items in PM order.
to clarify further,
Currently I am able to do settlement to cost center as per settlement rule in pm order with one order line item, when i have 2nd line item in same order, we are not able to do settlement thru ko88 because this has been linked to dip profile.
pl revert if u need more info
thanks in advance
regards
srihari

Allocation Structure - Maintenance in production system

Hi all,
is there any way of maintaining the allocation structures (KSES) in production without opening the system (modifying the client status)?
Thanks in advance for your replyes!!!

Hello Sadishivan,
The idea is not to create the allocation structure in production directly, but to be able to maintain the assessment cost element or even insert a new assigment, without the need of a Transport Order.
As example, the maintanance of Cycles is not modificable by default, but there is an option to maintain them in a not modificable mandt by implementing note OSS 326080.
I didnt find any OSS Note which would allow to do that with the allocation structures... but maybe there is another way of maintaining them in a not modificable mandant?
Thanks again for the reply

PCA - Quantity Allocation structure

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for