PCNF status for Service order

Hello Experts,
On Service scenario, I want not to proceed sales order if the system status of the service order PCNF (Partially confirmed)..... Is there any configuration path to do this?
Best Regards,
Amr

I hope you want to restrict sales order creation. There are 2 ways to restrict.
1. Using User Status for Service Orders
Create one user status profile in OIBS by having object type as Maintenance Order. Define one user status as PCN1. Double click that user status. Click create button in Business transaction & go to Partially confirm order option and select Set option. Then go to Create Sales document & select the option as Forbidden.
Assign that User status profile to your order type in OIOG.
2. Using System status
Its not recommended as it may affect other transactions & may create inconsistency.

Similar Messages

  • Overall Processing status for Service Order is incorrect

    On Service order the overall processing status is incorrect at the header.  It remains in status Being Processed even though it is fully processed.  Any suggestions on where to look?

    Can you elaborate a bit more.
    starting from creation of service order to outbound delivery.
    as per my understanding, if you want to do service order process with goods movement.
    In our current client, we are planning to do in below method:
    Customer requests for the service, this service is done in 2 ways,
    1- Service at customer site
    2- service from plant
    in First case, service request will be created from VA01- order related billing. Technician will be sent to customer site along with the spare parts,with ref to this order. Once job is done.Technician will get acknowledgement from customer. Once technicians submit this , then authorized person will remove the billing block from service order, do issue invoice.
    Service order is copy of OR w/o delivery & with order related billing,inlcuding billing block in OR type.
    Fine tune the relevant settings in config.
    2-Service from Plant,
    Create service request, is copy of RE, inward the matererial with PGR. once jobwork is done, create Confirm Service order ( copy of OR ) with ref to above Service Req, create outbound delivery-PGI & Invoice.
    Hope it helps,
    Thought of others in similar scenario with any difference will be really helpful.

  • Inbox Search of Status for Service Order in CRM_IC

    Hi all,
    When I am searching for a Service Order status in Inbox search in CRM_IC in the Result List it is not displaying Service Orders which are in same Status. It is displaying the list of Service Orders with different Status like Open, Inprocess, Not Completed etc., Can any body please........with details.
    Points will be rewarded for currect answer
    Thanks,
    Shrik.

    I have never used this function module before, but looking at the coding, I don't think this will serve your purpose.
    I think it might be better to use method(s) from class CL_CRM_DOCUMENTS.
    Via the GET_INFO method you can retrieve the documents you need and using the DELETE method should delete these object. I did use the GET_INFO method etc. but we haven't deleted any objects. But according to the name of the method, it should DELETE the documents.

  • How to get system status and user status of service order

    Hi,
    I want to show user status and system status for service order in my report and i am using CRM_ORDER_READ function module to read the status, but it is returning lot of status records, could anyone please suggest how to get the system status and user status for service order.
    I did not find any clue for how to get user status, i can see the user status when i open the transaction using CRMD_ORDER.
    Regards,
    Kamesh Bathla

    Hi,
      Go to CRM_JEST table give your service order guid and get the status, pass this status into TJ02. You will get the status of your order.
    Regards
    Srinu

  • Restriction of user status in service order for billing due list

    Dear CRM Experts,
    I have configured status profile for service order as OPEN,INPROCESS and Completed and have assigned this to the service order transaction type.
    Now once i save a service order without errors ,the system is automatically generating abilling document in  billing due list TX:BEA_DL_01 even though the user status assigned to it is OPEN ,INPROCESS AND COMPLETED.
    According to our client requirement ,a billing document has to be created in Billing due list if the User status assigned to it is COMPLETED only.
    Please suggest the solution.
    Bye,
    Madhav

    Hi Nanda,
    As per your last reply, for some Service Orders you are unable to change the Status. Can you have check whether those service Orders are error free?
    Sometimes, when there are errors in service orders or in 1Orders you cannot change the status from In Process or Open even when you have released certain Items.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks,
    Samantak.

  • Default settlement rule with settlement type as FUL for service orders

    Hi Folks,
    Could you please advise me on the below issue?
    Requirement: setting up of default settlement rule with default settlement receiver as u201CCOST CENTREu201D and settlement type as u201CFULu201D for the maintenance orders (Order category u2013 30).
    I was trying to configure the same in transaction KSR3_ORI to assign the strategy to the service order type by clicking u201CNew Entriesu201D system not showing the drop list for the status column which is a mandatory field.
    We have applied the below notes:
    Note 313454 - Info: Default value for settlement type
    Note 851975 - Settlement use automatic generation creates
    Could you please guide us to get the default settlement rule for service orders along with settlement type as u201CFULu201D

    I was also with this problem in 2013 january and only found some information about this, here.
    Our solution was change the Maximum number of distribution rules in Maintain Settlement Profiles to 1, because we wanted the FUL rule and it is always in the first line.
    Now, for curiosity, I was search for another solution and found the SAP note 2028108 that explain that is not possible to change the strategy for PM/CS orders.
    This note was released at 09.06.2014

  • User Status for PM Order

    Hi everybody,
    I have created a user status for PM orders. the problem is when Order status in CNF ( confirmed ) and I use IW45 to cancel confirmation, the user status doesn't change to Release and still remain CNF. I couldn't find any business transaction for that.
    what do you do for such case?
    thanks in advance

    Hi Daniel,
    I doubt that some communication gap is going on.
    System Status
    - An Order with status TECO CNF ... converts to REL CNF ...  when the TECO cancels.
    - This status further changes to REL PCNF when you cancel any Operation Confirmation (IW45).
    - Similarly  TECO PCNF  also possible.
    If I remember correctly, you were asking about User Status trigger upon change of System Status,
    If you agree with the very 1st line of this post, you may start a fresh by explaining the requirements again, if possible more clearly. The probability for fresh thinking and responding from forum would increase.
    Best wishes
    Jogeswara Rao K

  • Hoe to see if an USER-Status of service order is changed

    Hi,
    for service order we use a user-status profile. Every things worcs as we want.
    Now the question is: how can i see if the user-status is changed?
    First i use IW31 to create an service order. Next day the user-status will be changed (IW32).
    Where can i see, that it is changed?
    Regards, Dieter

    When user and system statuses are changed, records of JEST are updated and records are inserted into table JCDS, check this table.
    - JEST - current status
    - JCDS - log of status - with date/time/user
    In transaction IW32/33, you can see the history of statuses: click on "information" icon in status line, then on "display status" screen, go to menu : Extras, Change document, All or For a selected status.
    Regards,
    Raymond

  • Settlement Rule for service order created based on sales order

    Hello,
    I am creating a sales order and entering  WBS as an cost object.
    After creation of sales order the Service order is created.
    For service order type in the settlement profile  WBS is maintained.
    But the system is not copying the WBS in Service order which is maintained in sales order.
    Can any body have an idea on this?
    Regards
    Abhijit

    Hi,
    As far as my understanding when service order is created through sales order then settlement rule is SDI and its item number
    Not what you maintained in account assignment tab of sales order
    When you settle service order then cost will settle on sales document and its item and then latter you settle sales order then settlement receiver is WBS element which you maintained in account assignment tab
    Kapil

  • Pricing date for Service Order and Service Confirmation

    Hi,
    I cretated a Service Confirmation as followup for Service Order.
    Client is asking "Pricing Date" should be same Same in Service Order and Service Confirmation. But, I am not seeing any such field in the screen.
    I need to check T&C field and Zone field. But, I am not seeing these fields also.
    Can you please let me know, where can I find this fields. (In which assignment block).
    Thanks,
    Sandeep
    Edited by: Sandeep Reddy on May 31, 2010 7:21 PM

    Hi,
    I think by PRICING DATE they mean BILLING DATE.
    In date profile of SERVICE ORDER and SERVICE CONFIRMATION you assign the BILLING DATE date type (i think it is there in the standard itself- however just ensure it).
    Or customize a PRINCING DATE date type in the DATE PROFILE of SERVICE ORDER and CONFIRMATION and copy the date set in SERVICE ORDER to SERVICE CONFIRMATION.
    This is one strategy you can use.
    Regards
    Surendra More

  • BAPI for Service order creation

    Hi ,
    Please tell me if any Bapi for service order creation  , T-code : IW31
    regards,
    Prakash

    Hi Prakash,
    Have a look on the following BAPIs:
    BAPI_ISUSMORDER_CREATEMULTIPLE - Create Service Orders
    BAPI_ALM_CONF_CREATE - Create confirmation for maintenance/service order
    WTY04_CREATE_SERVICE_ORDER - Create Service order via function module.
    Hope this will help.
    Regards,
    Nitin.

  • FM for Service Order

    hi,
    require a FM for Service order Details IW73.
    cheers,
    Aditya.

    Did you try BAPI_ALM_ORDER_GET_DETAIL?
    Regards,
    Ravi
    Note : Please mark all the helpful answers

  • Plan Assessment and Allocation for Service Orders (CS)

    Hello,
    I'm trying to run plan assessment (KSUB) and plan allocation (KO9E) for a service order (created via IW31), but I'm not able to do it.
    I can do assessments (KSU5) and allocations (KO8G) with real values, but since I'm not able to do it in plan mode, I can't have comparative values between real and planned values (no value is flowing to allocation secondary cost elements).
    Can anyone let me know if this is some sort of limitation for Service Orders? Because I checked SPRO in transaction code KOAI and for this type of orders there is no Indicator for Integrated Planning, nor it's possible to assign a planning profile.
    Many thanks for any help you can provide!
    Regards,
    Cátia

    I created a SAP message and they confirmed that this is not possible.

  • WBS Settlement rule control for service orders

    Hello,
    We have an requirement to implement validation point for service order settlement rule. Currently there is no validation check of settlment rule for service order. So that the settlement is happend to incorrect receivers in service orders.
    For example :
    Service order created for company code - 400 and the settlement rule receiver should be WBS which is belongs to same company code but some case , user are maintained wrong WBS in settlement rule which belongs to some other company code.
    Can you please hlep us on this requirement and suggest any enhencement point avalible on the same.
    Thanks
    Risha

    Hi,
    Please go to okg2,
    Calculate wip or result analysis
    remove the tick for Order In Engineer to Order Production
    Now run result analysis and check whether settlement will not happen for cross company code.
    please check this and revert back.
    Thanking you
    Vengaiah Chowdary

  • BAPI for Service Orders Confirmation

    Can somebody please provide BAPIS for Service Orders Confirmation and other related BAPIS
    Thank you

    To create service confirm order use "BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI".
    Regards,
    Animesh

Maybe you are looking for

  • Planned orders not getting generated

    Hi friends, we are running material level MRP  MD02 (make to `order scenario). when we run MRP instead of generating planned orders, it is generating Purchase requisition . i can see purchase requisition generated instead of planned orders in MD04 sc

  • How Can I Turn On My Webcam?

    i want to know how to turn on my dell inspiron 3520 built in webcam and does it have a built in microphone?and i curious can someone spying you without you knowing and the light on? i do research on google, and somebody tell that can be happen,is tha

  • Date sorting in internal table

    Dear Friends    I wish to know how i perform the date operations in internal table... I am looking for the most recent record from the internal table for that i am supposed to look at chdate and chtime fields gives me the information on most correntl

  • Airport Express has stopped working, no IP-adress

    Airport Express has stopped working. In my Airport tool, I can't see the Airport Express anymore. Under network, I can still see the Airport, but it says, that it cant find an IP-Adress. It can see my Airport Extreme. Thanks in advance. Best Clintcoo

  • Pc compatibility tool problems

    Right, i am developing a tool to help users ascertain whether or not a given set of pc components are compatible with each other. To do this i have a number of classes, each representing a hardware type (and in several cases, subclasses of these type