PDF as default selection for Select printing cotrol (for Web)

Hi
Can someone point me to righ direction? What we are trying to do is, in Infoview, set PDF as default selection for "Select printing Control (for Web)", so that each user does not have to do this in preferences in infoview.
Is it possible to do so? If yes, how?
Thank you
Regards
IMS

Take a look for a .vbs sample that synchs the ADMINISTRATOR preferences to all users on the BOE platform.
You can schedule this as a PROGRAM OBJECT in InfoView so that it runs on a regular schedule to apply the change to new users.

Similar Messages

  • How do I get Adobe PDF to show up as a printer option for Illustrator?

    How do I get Adobe PDF to show up as a printer option for Illustrator?

    It is usually at the bottom of your printers list. Do you see it on Control Panel/Hardware and Sound/Devices and Printers/Printers?

  • Sending a photo heavy PDF for book printing on a web press.  Convert photo in photoshop first or Acrobat 11?

    Hi,
         The printing company for our photo book on Loons, uses roll fed web presses.  They have asked for a pdf set to X-1a.
    First soft proof was light and washed out.  Printer had us increase saturation and contrast.  Second proof
    all our blue water photos come out more purple then blue. 
    We currently  used srgb jpeg photos embedded in a ms word document.  We used acrobat 11 to create the pdf using the request X-1a
    setting.
        Should we have converted the photos in photoshop to the requested setting first and then embedded them in word?
    Thanks for any help.

    Can you show us screen shots of your X-1 PDF Settings ( i.e., Color )?  The reason why I ask is my default Distiller PDF-X1a:2001 Settings use a working space of RGB = sRGB IEC61966-2.1; and CMYK = US Web Coated (SWOP) v2 with the "Color Management Policies: "Convert All Colors to CMYK" ( default ); Rendering Intent ( default is "Preserve" ).  Have you discussed these settings with the print service provider?  These settings, if they are identical in Acrobat 11, would appear to have the same RGB work space as your original sRGB based pics. I sense that Word, although not a color managed application, would work as an image carrier into Acrobat 11 where the image files may retain their profiles going into Acrobat 11 and remain intact going out of Acrobat 11 via a PDF-X1a.  In which case, the print service provider then RIP and Prints the file for a hardcopy proof. In your case, the previous digital printer did a good job reproducing the photos as you supplied them, Word or no Word.  The question now becomes what changed with this new service provider?  Their prepress people must of accepted your documents and pushed them through their workflow.  So, what changed? I know of no way to "swap" images using Acrobat.  In your case, it may be a matter of saving a second set of files or the entire book document as a copy and replacing the pics in that file, then create a second PDF-X1a file.  And, as a third option, use InDesign ( however, no point in using it until you've determined where the problem with quality lies ).  If I assume the printer told you that the sRGB files were sufficient and, if you used the X-1 PDF Settings when Saving As > PDF, that would be their preferred workflow and the image files rendered dull and unsaturated ( as they did in your case ), and the printer recommended you increase the saturation and HUE of the images ( which he did ) and the entire workflow worked for a digital printer in the past ( which it did ), then something changed with this new print service provider.  You have to find out from them what it could be.  It could be something with their direct-to-plate equipment.  I believe it merits further research and development with the new service provider.  There is a solution.  You just have to find it.
    "Once the pdf is created could I swap out the photos
    for ones that had been converted from RGB to CMYK in photoshop with  Rendering Intent and Black Point Compensation etc. filled. "...
    Wait a minute.  You did a RGB-to-CMYK conversion in Photoshop?  Why?  I thought you embedded the RGB files in Word?  Then, Acrobat did the conversion using the X-1 settings mentioned above.
      "How hard would it be to dump my word document into InDesign with  the newly created RGB or CMYK photos would it work better?  Is the learning curve too much of a hassle for one off?"...
    Yes it would.  But, your procedures worked for the digital printer.  Why not now with the new printer?  That's my question.  Since Acrobat's X-1 settings have a work space of sRGB ( assumed ), then your sRGB files should render appropriately and they do not.  You have to find out what works for this new print service provider and, whatever Photoshop Color Setting RGB workspace you use, use it in Acrobat 11.  Discuss the entire document and Photoshop setups with the new print service provider.

  • Hi, I am looking for a printing solution for iPads in the office space, my question is how can I print from iPads and if the iPads are connected to a wifi router on a network would I be able to print from a networked printer?

    Hi
    We are looking at placing iPads in our offices but need to understand the printing options available? I have a number of questions?
    1/ Would I be able to print to a networked printer?
    2/ what would be the best WIFI Printer available for extensive printing?
    3/ Are there any other printing options available?
    Thank you in advance!

    The roll over logs all have the same name exact the extension is .lo_ , So.. I'm not sure what you are looking for.
    Garth Jones | My blogs: Enhansoft and
    Old Blog site | Twitter:
    @GarthMJ

  • Bonjour won't let me select an Apple print driver for an HP printer

    I am trying to print from a Windows XP machine to an HP Photoshop 7350 printer attached to my Power Mac G4 using a wireless connection. However, when I try to assign an Apple color print driver in Bonjour Printer Wizard to the HP Photosmart 7350 printer, the Printer Wizard only allows me to select print drivers from the manufacturer HP.
    How can I get Bonjour Printer Wizard to let me assign Apple drivers? I know they are somewhere on the XP machine, because I was able to use them in the Printer Wizard with a different printer (an older Apple Personal Laserwriter).

    Hi Stephen. I think the easiest thing would be to
    download the Bonjour 1.0.2 beta release from the
    Apple web site.
    http://www.apple.com/bonjour/
    That release should have this problem fixed, and the
    Printer Wizard will automatically select Generic
    Postscript in your case which should allow you to
    print. Hope that helps.
    PowerBook G4 Mac OS X (10.4.3)
    I've got the latest Bonjour on my XP machine and I'm attempting to print to an Epson SCX4600 on my Mac. I selected the default Generic PS. The test print goes to the CX4600 queue - attempts to print but doesn't and just stops the queue. I tried to start the queue and the same thing happens over. Any ideas?

  • Query on SRM Authorization for PO Print Preview from Web Browser

    Hi All,
    I would like to restrict PO Preview option in Web browser for users who has SAP_EC_BBP_EMPLOYEE Role only. Kindly let me know that how I can restrict the PO Preview option with popup message like 'Authorization is not given to see the PO Print Preview'.
    Thanks a lot in advance.
    Thanks,
    Sudarsan

    You can just revoke the authorization. This would remove the prining option for the user, rather than providing a message.
    I guess this should be
    Authorization Object - BBP_PD_PO
    Activity (ACTVT) - 04
    Note: The necesary object in the Object Class - BBP.
    Regards
    Kathirvel

  • Error messages for HP printer drivers for printers I don't have

    I keep getting error messages that say "HP Color LaserJet 3600 doesn't have a driver" and "HP LaserJet 4000 Series doesn't have a driver" but I don't have either of these HP models and I don't think I ever did. I tried to skip the message but it keeps coming back. Any ideas?  Do I completely unload all my HP software and reload it? 
    Thanks!

    Which computer? There is a label on the bottom.
    Do I completely unload all my HP software and reload it? 
    Which HP software? Give us the model numbers of HP devices in use.
    When do the messages occur?
    Please attach a picture.
    -Jerry

  • Pre-Size Your PPI for Best Print - Once Good Advice Still Good?

    In another thread someone mentinoed pre-sizing image data to prepare it for best printing.
    For a long time it's been "standard advice" to resize images so that the ppi is an even division of the printer's dpi, because some years ago occasionally one would run across printers that would produce poor results if you didn't - you might see jaggies in straight edges for example.
    Thing is, computers have (not so) quietly been getting more powerful over time, and printer makers have been competing with one another to try to make their printers produce better results than the other guys.  One way they've done this is by improving the quality of the algorithms in the printer drivers.  Use of mega storage and high accuracy math, which was once taxing on older computer systems, is now standard practice.
    So it's time to question the old rule of thumb.
    Making a few assumptions about the many variables (what printer, what OS, what version of drivers, what application being used to print) , there seem to be several questions here:
    1.  Can the image resolution be too high, causing the printer driver to make bad decisions about what ink dots to lay down where on the paper?
    2.  Does it help or matter if the image PPI is an even division of the printer's DPI?
    As I have done in the past, I set out to do some actual testing, to see if I can actually SEE anything to help answer these questions.
    I created a sharp image to be printed at 3 x 2 inches:  http://Noel.ProDigitalSoftware.com/ForumPosts/Ghirardelli.jpg
    Then I printed it at 6 different resolutions (1000, 720, 567, 300, 200, and 100 ppi) by resampling the image, labeling it, printing from Photoshop CS5, and feeding the same sheet of HP Premium Plus photo paper through my older HP 932c inkjet printer 6 times.  The printer was set to its highest quality settings, including 2400 x 1200 dpi mode.  This was the result:
    I then looked critically and as objectively as I could at the different images.  Here are my observations:
    Naked eye:
    The four highest resolution images (1000, 720, 567, and 300 ppi) all seemed to have an equivalent high level of crisp detail.
    I could not detect the inkjet dots.  Smooth objects look smooth.
    Jeweler's Loupe:
    I could see significant reduction in the finest details in the 300 ppi print vs. the three higher resolution prints, and a slight reduction in the 567 ppi vs. 720.
    At no resolution were any jaggies or evidence of aliasing visible.
    The inkjet dot pattern was plainly visible, and it does differ between the different prints.  But it was not possible to say whether one was "better".
    Things seem to have a little more texture in the 1000 ppi print vs. the 720 and 567 ppi prints.
    Macro Photo:
    Lacking a high resolution scanner, I took photographs of the 6 different prints.  Unfortunately, I didn't have the time to set up with my best lighting and lens combination, so I got some reflections off the glossy paper, and and at this resolution I can't really see the inkject dots in the photos.  I want to repeat this when I can find more time to do it better.  As I did these photos hand-held, I believe the variances between them could be slightly influencing the results.  But I'm going to post them anyway, for you to see.
    I could see ever so slightly more detail in the 720 ppi print vs. the 1000 ppi print, though from the size of the tiny dust/light reflections I think it may have just been the better focused.  Note that this observation is not supported by direct observation through the jeweler's loupe, above.
    The 1000 ppi and 567 ppi prints seems to have slightly more noise or texture than the 720 ppi print.  Again, this might be issues introduced by the photography process, though I did note a possible increase in texture in the 1000 ppi print with the jeweler's loupe as well.
    Beyond just the blurring, I could see some evidence that straight lines are not quite as straight in the lower resolutions (300 ppi and lower).  This seemed more apparent than with the jeweler's loupe examination, and I wonder whether the Photoshop downsampling process could have introduced it.
    Left to right, top to bottom:  1000, 720, 567, 300, 200, 100:
    Conclusions:
    Printing to my HP 932c inkject printer on Windows 7 x64
    300 ppi is not sufficient to coax the best possible detail out of an inkjet printer.  It appears a number in the vicinity of 720 or more is better, and this number could be much higher with modern very high resolution printers (mine's old). 
    Speed was no different in printing any of these - a modern computer can process a huge amount of data in the blink of an eye.
    When a sufficiently high resolution image is printed (in this case 567 ppi or higher) I saw virtually no evidence that a particular ppi value is superior, for example an even division of the printer's dpi, though in hindsight I realize I should have prepared a 600 ppi image (duh).  I will add a 600 ppi image before I re-photograph the results.
    It's possible ever so slightly more texture becomes visible at 1000 ppi than 720 ppi, but it might be just noise.
    Practically speaking, from looking critically at the results I could not see a reason to pre-size the image for a specific ppi value.
    I encourage you to experiment and report your results with your particular combination of gear.
    Your comments are welcome!
    -Noel

    Noel Carboni wrote:
    Jeff Schewe wrote:
    I would never suggest people actually downsample though...why waste the pixels?
    Exactly.  There was a statement in another recent thread that downsampling to be an even fraction of the print dpi was important to do.
    It might have been a misapplied extension of the advice to upsample.  It's not been all that long that we've had big enough high resolution data that even makes downsampling a possibility.
    -Noel
    I believe I was the one to make that statement, which was based on recommendations by an Epson Print expert at a seminar demoing printers. He showed to prints from the same file, one set at an even multiple of 720 and the other some random number. It was subtle but visible the difference. That was probably 5 years ago.
    In the meantime, I have made extensive tests of prints on my Epson 3800 trying many combinations of single pass, hi speed, Super fine print (2880x1440) and down to the basic level.
    Everything evened out at 720 dpi. At 360, which is where I output from ACR, I can make an 8x12 print with no resampling whatsoever. Upping that to 720 and pushing the printer hard (2880x1440, single pass on Canson Platine), I see a discernable difference in the smooth tonalities.
    As I understood you from past conversations, you employ the maximum output size from ACR which in my case, would double the file size by upsampling, and if necessary, downsample from that. I am not comfortable doing that as a default operation, but perhaps Jeff S might step in here and clarify.  After all, ACR does offer that option! But my file size now goes from ~70MP to 143 MP, cutting my storage capability by 1/2. It's not a trivial matter when two of us here can run 600 to 800 images in 1/2 day!

  • Create PDF which does not allow to print

    My customer would like to use smartform HR_ESS_PAYSLIP_TO_PDF. The requirement is to convert the payslip to PDF, not allow to print the PDF.
    The <b>no print</b> information should be included in the document itself.
    I know this is generally possible because there a converters which have these option, e.g. http://www.abxzone.com/abx_reviews/paragon6/article_p3.html see "security ranging".
    How can I set this up using smartforms?
    Kind regards
    Marcus

    HI Paulo,
    Perhaps the Preview preference file is corrupted after the upgrade.
    Delete this file.
    com.apple.Preview.plist
    /Users/YourName/Library/Preferences. Drag that file to the Trash, empty the Trash and restart your Mac.
    See if that makes a difference.
    Also, check the manufacture web site for your printer and see if there are any updates available for your printer model for compatibility with 10.6. That could be part of the problem.
    Some users are having luck with reinstalling the software that originally came with their printers. If you do not have the disk, go to the web site and download the drivers for 10.5. They might work.
    Carolyn

  • Printer driver for canon LBP-1120

    Hi guys,
    I'm searching for a printer driver for the Canon Lasershot LBP-1120. I've been looking around a bit on google but haven't found anything very helpful.
    Thanks.

    I don't know how, and if you have to ask, you probably don't, either. Sorry.
    If you still have the PC that you can use as print server, try this:
    http://iharder.sourceforge.net/current/macosx/winmacprinter/

  • Care button and finger print reader for 3000 N200 not working

    I have bought Lenovo 3000 N200 model. THe Care button and finger print reader not working. I have loaded the hot key driver as well as finger print reader driver. I have XP OS on my notebook. The software for finger print reader for XP (64 bit) which is there in the lenovo site is not getting loaded.
    Kinldly help.

    Hi @Sean-Ireland
    Welcome to the HP Support Forums! I saw your post regarding the problems with your fingerprint reader not working. I will be happy to help you with this. Start by installing both your Validity Fingerprint Sensor Driver and the Digital Persona Fingerprint Reader Software. Let me know how it goes.
    Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue.
    Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!
    Thank you,
    BHK6
    I work on behalf of HP

  • 10.6 snow leopard printer driver for Z23

    Help!! I looked and looked everywhere for a printer driver for Z23 on OS 10.6. I tried to load the optional installation from CD but, after installing, it did not list Z23 and it screwed up my other printer drivers. I got Z23 printer from Apple Store when I purchased Mini Mac with OS 10.2. But, the mini mac died and I had to purchase iMac with 10.5 and then upgraded to 10.6. So, I really need a Lexmark Z23 printer driver for Mac OS 10.6 so bad. Please expedite. I really appreciate it.

    The last driver for the Z23 for Mac is for OS X 10.3. <http://support.lexmark.com/index?locale=en&productCode=Z23COLOR_JETPRINTER&userlocale=EN_US&segment=DOWNLOAD&os=MAC_OS_X_10_3_X&page=downl oadsList&oslocale=enUS#1> That's it, there ain't no more. It's no longer supported and hasn't been for a very long time. I had a Z23 many years ago and was less than impressed with its performance then. (The very first item on the FAQ: "Why is my Z23 so slow?" and no, they weren't joking.) And that thing shipped with just a colour cart, you needed to buy the black cart separately... and it wasn't easy to find the black carts. You're gonna need a new printer. Sorry, but them's the facts.

  • Scanning Printed Materials for 4K

    Hi there,
    I need to get a number of printed materials (photos, letters, articles etc) scanned by numerous people across the U.S. for a current project.
    I would like to get the material scanned at the highest resolution possible to allow for zooming/re-framing in Premiere.
    I am wondering what is/if there is a recommended dpi for scanning printed materials for 4K screening?
    From calling every place I can find in the first location, for some of the most important material, the highest resolution print/copy places offer seems to be 600dpi.
    I am wondering if 600dpi is usually the max limit for scanning printed materials or if 1200dpi and upwards is typical and I somehow haven't managed to find the right places (although I have called literally every print/scan shop on google for the first city)?
    Many thanks...

    While dpi doesn't apply to video (which measures by pixels), it most certainly matters for scanning stills to be used in the video. The higher the dpi of the scan, the higher the resulting image resolution in pixels. 100dpi would be inadequate for even SD video if using less than an 8x10 source.
    Simple math says scanning dpi x inches (of source photo) = pixels
    An 8 x 10 image scanned at 600dpi would be 4800x6000 pixels. Note that most still images are not a 16:9 format, so the scanned image typically does not "fit" the video screen without some cropping or black edges to make up the difference. The 8x10" scan at 600dpi would work for 4k video, but smaller pics like a 4x6 or 5x7 is going to fall short, so yes you will want to try and scan at 1200dpi. What about wallets? Even at 1200dpi, not much resolution to work with.
    I like the photo idea of shooternz, if the photos can for instance be put on an easel and the still camera on a tripod takes a high megapixel image, if the lighting works without reflections. Might be an good option. I used to "grab" SD stills on a copy stand with a DV camera years ago.
    The maximum frame size that can be imported for still images and movies is 256 megapixels, with a maximum dimension of 32,768 pixels in either direction. Adobe Premiere Pro Help | Importing still images
    Thanks
    Jeff

  • Chinese Fonts are coming ZUNK when i do print preview from web UI

    Hello All,
    I have a smartform which includes a standard text which is maintained in Chinese language. This smartform would be called from web UI -> activities -> Fax -> print preview.
    when i do print preview of any activity, everything is coming correct except chinese text, it is coming as zunk characters.
    i have created a standard text ( through Tcode - SO10 ) in CHINESE When i call it in my Smartforms it is displaying like boxes ( garbage ) .
    But when seen in SO10 in Chinese login language the text is maintained properly in Chinese
    Please let me know wat is missed out or is there any settings which should be enabled.
    how would i do  Character set enabled for chinese language?
    Thank You...
    seema
    Edited by: seema rajjot on Sep 21, 2011 5:04 PM

    Hi Sagar,
    Yes that's a problem for Cyrillic fonts , I suppose you are using two action definitions : one for ES and one for EN print.
    For Spanish you have to use a smart style which supports the ISO Cyrillic characters and that will then open up correctly for Spanish users.
    Regards,
    Hasan Rafiq

  • When printing a list in Address Book, how can I select more than the default Attributes and keep them selected when I print again? I want to print ALL information for contacts so I have email address, notes, phone, company, title, etc all on one page.

    When printing a list in Address Book, how can I select more than the default Attributes and keep them selected when I print again? I want to print ALL information for contacts so I have email address, notes, phone, company, title, etc all on one page. I don't want to have to check off an additional 5 or 6 attributes each time I print out contact information. Is there a way to change the default setting for printing lists, so it is not just "phone," "photo," and "job title?"

    I have a user who wants to do this same thing. I did not find any way either to default the attributes to anything other than what you see the first time. Seems like such a trivial thing, hard to believe they do not allow it. I did find a program for this called iDress but I can't seem to download it from any links on the Internet. Not sure if it is free or not, but it was recommended by a link on the Mac support site.

Maybe you are looking for