PDF Colour Too Dark HELP!

I really need some advice, I have a deadline for my art GCSE closing in and there's a major problem with my final piece!
The actual art work is fine, and It looks fantastic viewed from photoshop. However, the printing company requires it to be in PDF format, and when I save as PDF the PDF file has darker, blander colours. Really noticable...
I find with photoshop everything I print comes out darker also.. so I tried researching this and found out a bit about CMYK and RGB but to be honest I need someone too explain this to me in english, with no highly confusing technical terms.
My final piece relies on bright pink and blue, and so I wouldn't want to waste the money printing it on A2, only for it to have dull colours.
Thank you so much in advance I am extremely worried
(I've uploaded a JPEG to show how I want it to look when printed, and then a PDF to show the annoying dull colour change)

The PDF simulates the preview in SWOP (CMYK). The JPG which you view stays in RGB.
In PS, you need to proof colors (ctrl-y) and make sure the proof setup view > proof setup is set to working CMYK. This is an accurate preview of the print. Another thing to look at (why the darkening happens) is the gamut warning (view > gamut warning, ctrl-shift-y) and see all the gray. Those are colors that are outside the CMYK gamut and will not print correctly (as you've seen).
You can see in the color picker those colors have the little warning triangle next to the new/current box. That means they're out of working CMYK gamut and will dull/flatten. Try converting to CMYK and then using adjustment layers to tweak the color (brightness, saturation, contrast) a bit. And learn to watch for that warning triangle. Building files in out of gamut colors can be problematic, as you've experienced.
This is a pic of the sRGB gamut (wireframe) with the sheetfed coated gamut (solid color). You can see in the pinks and bright blues you've chosen the sRGB gamut is hugely wider than the CMYK gamut. Never going to happen.

Similar Messages

  • Original .pdfs colours different (darker) in printed magazine - WHY?

    I am running InDesign on a PC (Windows XP). I use it to edit and design a full colour short run magazine which is professionally printed. My problem is that the colours of the final printers proofs and finished magazine are coming through darker in tone, particularly the reds and blues, than the .pdfs I generate using InDesign. On my screen and on the HP printer I use to run off test pages, the .pdfs colours are fine. Somehow the printers' equipment and/or software is making them darker on the final printed magazine, unacceptably so this time.
    We generate the magazine using InDesign and send the final .pdfs to the printers via an ftp server service (YouSendIt).  The printers then create the final proofs for me to approve and sign off. Sometimes they send me these in the post as printed sheets (sherpas) to sign off. Recently I have been going online to their "Delano" server and approve the proofs on line. Last time round however they had a problem with it and sent me the printed proofs to sign off.
    Most of the images we used originate as digital ones and are supplied to us as high res. Occasionally there is a scan. However as the printer uses cmyk images, and insists we convert any rgb images to cmyk before they will process our .pdfs. We do the picture conversion from rgb to cmyk using Photo-paint.
    In the past I have had problems with the colour balance of the final proofs being darker than my original .pdfs.  Changing colour balance at the pre-press stage is expensive and as it is just about acceptable if the final magazine does not contain too many photos with a lot of grass and sky, then I will let it run.
    But it has happened again and is unacceptable. I was sent a very good quality professional photo for the cover (in high res digital format) taken outdoors on a sunny day with a lot of grass and it has inevitably printed too dark on the final cover. (sky is greyish not blue and  grass is orange-ish not light green). Same problem throughout.
    The printed proofs supplied by the printers this time were too dark, so I phoned up the Production Manager to tell him this before I signed them off. He said not to worry as they were not 100% accurate for colour anyway. To be on the safe side, I marked on all the proofs individually that the colour was too dark, and printed out and sent them a .pdf of the cover, showing the correct colour balance.
    Still the printed magazine arrived too dark, just as it was on their proofs. I again complained to the Production Control Manager who put me onto their Technical Support guy, who is not very helpful (always looks at it being customers fault as his first position). He said first of all that it must be my scanning, and conversion from rgb to cmyk. I pointed out the cover photo was not scanned but an original high res digital image supplied by a press agency. So he then said my PC and printer must be at fault.
    I have gone back and looked at the colours on previous issues and they are all on the dark side, for example bright blue skies come out greyish, but it only really notices if there is a lot of grass and sky in the pictures. Is the printers software or equipment attempting to compensate for needing extra colour in some way? Also they are primarily a MAC house and I use a PC. Could this affect the colour calibrations?
    I need to talk to them again but want to do so from a position of knowing something about how a .pdf gets converted into a final proof and how the colours could get darker, given their tech support is unhelpful.
    If it is relevant, this is their printing equipment: Twin Computer-to-Plate lines; Two Heidelberg 8 colour presses .
    Any advice anyone can give on what might be causing the final magazine to be darker in tone than my InDesign .pdfs would be appreciated.

    Wow – thanks for all your suggestions I am going to have to take a while to digest and try them out and report back.
    I am in fact on very good terms with the Production Manager at the printers but I think he has rather been dropped in it, as it seems the unhelpful tech support guy has just left and not been replaced so the Production Control Manager is left trying to sort out advanced technical aspects of prepress for which he has not been trained.
    I have to ask why the printers don't give you the information you need up front instead of claiming a .pdf from Indesign is all it takes.
    In all this .pdf fine tuning stuff I am reminded of my earlier career in IT. I was involved in setting up an early wide area VOIP network (Voice over Internet Protocol  - a sort of Skype to the uninitiated). To make this work we needed a digital switchboard which was configured to the latest European standard and software to match. Everyone assured me that the protocol concerned (let us call it 802.11) was brand new and had not yet had time to develop any variations……of course there were all sorts of problems not least that the line kept dropping and everytime it restarted we got charged a reconnection charge. I won’t bore you with how we got there in the end but needless to say, one man’s VOIP implementation of VOIP using 802.11 is not necessarily another’s.
    I am reminded of this in all the issues surrounding exporting .pdfs to get the correct colour balance in the resulting publication. I swear to you this was never mentioned to me as being an issue at any time by anyone when we started down this route.
    Meanwhile today I asked the printers’ salesman chasing my business to send their technical spec – pointing out I work on a PC running XP - and this is what I got
    A sheet headed “Recommended settings for creating a PDF/X directly from Adobe InDesign CS3. This example was created on Mac OS x 10.5 using InDesign 5.0.1”  This is followed by a series of screen prints with the following headings
    Check your Transparency Flattener Preset is correctly configured (via the edit menu) this will be selected in the Advanced tab (step 6)
    Select File – Export then in Format chose Adobe PDF and name the file, select folder to save it to and click Save
    In General select single page to print set compatibility to Acrobat 4 (PDF 1.3) and deselect all the list Options and include checkboxes
    The Compression tab sets the options for how the PDF will handle resolutions for placed colour, grey scale and monochrome images
    The Printers marks should be enabled as below.
    Use the Destination and Output Intent profile name relevant to the publication. ISO Coated V2 300 is used here as an example only.
    Ensure there are only process colour and no Spot colours. Converting colour to CMYK at the PDF creation stage can give unpredictable results
    Select the transparency Flattener previously created. OPI should be disabled. Here is also where you can opt to create a JDF file
    Make sure all the options in Security are disabled. Summary lists all the settings that can be applied it can be saved as a text file for reference
    Note item 6 – it does not actually tell me what the printers recommended settings for my publication are
    And Note also item 7 where it says that converting to colour to CMYK at the PDF creation stage can give unpredictable results

  • Images in PDFs are too dark - wrong color, brightness, contrast

    I use my IPAD mainly for viewing medical books, e.g. radiological atlases. Most come in PDF format and most don't look much different on the IPAD than they do on PC. But it is very frustrating to find that the most important book I need looks incredibly bad on the IPAD - it's color reproduction of images is very poor compared to the PC. I've tried all possible viewers, the problem must be in the PDF rendering engine of the IPAD.
    Is this problem already known and is there a solution?
    Thank you for your help.

    Hi, did anybody read my fix to the problem from 19.09.2011?
    Here is another one I found on ipadforums.net:
    Fix to PDF Image problem
    Little after the fact, but in case any one googles to this like I did, I did find a work around for this. Only on a mac... I am running Lion and I simple Save as in Preview didn't do the trick for me.
    Two options, One a little easier then the other.  1. Open the file in preview. Chose File-> Export. Set the obvious and then under quartz filter select reduce file size. Then hit save. Put the file on your iPad and you should be good to go. This will also circumvent and "large" file size issues you may get from other ways to "fix" this.  2. If you need to have the images in even higher quality, as the first option may decrease the quality slightly then there are more steps.
    Select the file you need and choose open with-> ColorSync Utility. Top left of the screen is the button to open filter inspector (three circles, one green, blue and red). Click the downward triangle next to Reduce file size and select duplicate. Rename the copy to anything and then Press the downward triangle on this file. Select Add domains. Then Expand the field (triangle on the left of the name). Expand Image Expansion. Change the quality bar to max. Expand Domains and check PDF workflows. Close the filters box.
    On the bottom of the original screen that was opened there is a filter option. Select the file you just created and click apply. Then save the file and you are good to go with a higher quality.  This will fix any color issues with pdf images on iPads. I had pdf images that the colors were off on, almost negative and this worked like a charm. Once its set up its very easy and quick for future pdf image problems.

  • Hello, I have a Windows 7 Pc where Lightroom 5 is on installed.  When I open a photo using " verkenner" I see a good coloured photo.  When I open a photo via Lightroom 5, the photo will be too dark. This gives difficluties during shaping the photograph. C

    Hello,
    I have a Windows 7 Pc where Lightroom 5 is on installed.
    When I open a photo using " verkenner" I see a good coloured photo.
    When I open a photo via Lightroom 5, the photo will be too dark. This gives difficulties during shaping the photograph. Can someone help me to solve this problem?
    Kind Regards,
    Marianne

    Into the Develop module Not all the sliders in the Basic Panel are at 0.
    Temperature ° is on 5600
    Colourtint is on + 30
    Balans: slider in the middle
    History panel:
    Balans gespitste tinten -3   0
    Balans gespitste tinten -3   3

  • Images too dark on Samsung monitor - please help!

    We've just upgraded a Samsung 21" monitor to a Samsung 30" (305T).
    In just TWO applications, Photoshop CS3 and Windows Photo Gallery (Vista64), all photographic images are much too dark. Not subtly, about 3-4 f-stops too dark.
    EVERY other of our applications INCLUDING ADOBE BRIDGE AND FIREWORKS, and even Photoshop itself during Save to Web, displays the photos as they should appear.
    I've tried setting various profiles in Windows Color Management as the default, including the ICC profile sRGB IEC61966-2.1 (which my reading says we should be using), as well as WCS profiles sRGB virtual and scRGB virtual, and tried using no profile at all. None of these changes makes any apparent difference at all to the images we're seeing.
    In Photoshop, I've tried various options too. If set to Monitor Color (Monitor RGB - * wscRGB) Photoshop then displays images as it should. However the Camera Raw display when loading Nikon images is still much too dark, and the Photoshop Save to Web images are much too light. Arrrgh!
    The monitor does not include any driver software, just electronic documentation (poorly edited) which offers no advice about this. I've seen references to various Gamma utilities, but not sure that's what I need. Is it?
    Any help or suggestions would be much appreciated!
    TIA

    Thanks Peter & Sid. I appreciate the advice, but it doesn't match our experience over 12 years of designing web applications so I'm having trouble understanding what's different, can I ask for any more advice you might have?
    If we calibrate the monitor using the recommended tools, will Photoshop images look 2-3 f-stops brighter (i.e. as they should look) and will images in all other apps (which look fine now, have always looked fine) look 2-3 f-stops too bright? Or would we be changing JUST the way Photoshop sees the images?
    Through probably a dozen different previous CRT and LCD monitors, we've never calibrated anything. Even on our immediately-previous Samsung 213T monitor, images appear pretty much the same in Photoshop as they do in all other places. That includes published web sites viewed with several popular browsers and viewed on literally hundreds of different systems inside and outside of our office.
    The previous monitor was being used with exactly the same software and hardware as the new one. The only thing that's changed is the monitor.
    Peter asks about brightness or white point luminance. I haven't used any tool to determine that. The monitor is set to 50% brightness, for whatever that's worth, but I can tell you that it is substantially BRIGHTER on white than the previous monitor. The previous Samsung monitor is being run side-by-side with the new one, and it looks quite dull and yellow beside the new one (and we thought it was a great monitor!) The new 30" Samsung has MUCH whiter whites. Does that help even a little?
    Thanks for any further advice.

  • Color management help needed for adobe CS5 and Epson printer 1400-Prints coming out too dark with re

    Color management help needed for adobe CS5 and Epson printer 1400-Prints coming out too dark with reddish cast and loss of detail
    System: Windows 7
    Adobe CS5
    Printer: Epson Stylus Photo 1400
    Paper: Inkjet matte presentation paper with slight luster
    Installed latest patch for Adobe CS5
    Epson driver up to date
    After reading solutions online and trying them for my settings for 2 days I am still unable to print what I am seeing on my screen in Adobe CS5. I calibrated my monitor, but am not sure once calibration is saved if I somehow use this setting in Photoshop’s color management.
    The files I am printing are photographs of dogs with lots of detail  I digitally painted with my Wacom tablet in Photoshop CS5 and then printed with Epson Stylus 1400 on inkjet paper 20lb with slight luster.
    My Printed images lose a lot of the detail & come out way to dark with a reddish cast and loss of detail when I used these settings in the printing window:
    Color Handling: Photoshop manages color, Color management -ICM, OFF no color adjustment.
    When I change to these settings in printer window: Color Handling:  Printer manages color.  Color management- Color Controls, 1.8 Gamma and choose Epson Standard it prints lighter, but with reddish cast and very little detail and this is the best setting I have used so far.
    Based on what I have read on line, I think the issue is mainly to do with what controls are set in the Photoshop Color Settings window and the Epson Printer preferences. I have screen images attached of these windows and would appreciate knowing what you recommend I enter for each choice.
    Also I am confused as to what ICM color management system to use with this printer and CS5:
    What is the best ICM to use with PS CS5 & the Epson 1400 printer? Should I use the same ICM for both?
    Do I embed the ICM I choose into the new files I create? 
    Do I view all files in the CS5 workspace in this default ICM?
    Do I set my monitor setting to the same ICM?
    If new file opens in CS5 workspace and it has a different embedded profile than my workspace, do I convert it?
    Do I set my printer, Monitor and PS CS5 color settings to the same ICM?
    Is using the same ICM for all devices what is called a consistent workflow?
    I appreciate any and all advice that can be sent my way on this complicated issue. Thank you in advance for your time and kind help.

    It may be possible to figure out by watching a Dr.Brown video on the subject of color printing. Adobe tv
    I hope this may help...............

  • IMovie to iDVD--Video too dark, sound too loud--Help!

    I created three iMovie projects for my son's swim team, then made a DVD using iDVD. It was fine when viewed in iDVD's preview, but when burned to the DVD-R the video was too dark and the sound was way too loud. This is footage taken on a Sony digital camcorder (DCR-TRV11).
    I did the iDVD project by starting from scratch from within iDVD, then dragging the iMovie pieces and still images into the iDVD project. The iMovie pieces were prepared by using Share to make them into "full quality" .dv movies.
    When I play the finished DVD on my iMac, there are no unusual problems with the video or audio. It looks and sounds like it did when played from the digital camcirder. But when played on both of my standalone DVD players + TVs, the video is too dark and the audio is much too loud.
    Any idea why this is, and to fix it? I don't find a way to reduce the audio volume in iMovie. Maybe there is a workaround using the Relative Volume feature, but all my clips have a similar sound level. Any help will be appreciated.
    --Eric
    iMac G5   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  

    when burned to the DVD-R the video was too dark
    They is a VERY slight darkening during the MPG-2 compression process (see my pages Digital Video Color Bars Test at http://homepage.mac.com/profpixel/color_bars/colorbars.htm and iMovie HD and iDVD 5 Gray Patch Test at http://homepage.mac.com/profpixel/gray_patches/graypatches.htm )
    I suspect what you are seening is a major difference in brightness/contrast between your computer monitior and your TV set (and in fact you admit this: "When I play the finished DVD on my iMac, there are no unusual problems with the video or audio. It looks and sounds like it did when played from the digital camcirder. But when played on both of my standalone DVD players + TVs, the video is too dark and the audio is much too loud.") so you aren't seeing an iDVD problem.

  • Installed Yosemite and iPhoto 9.6. A lot of my photos are much too dark now and the colour is not right. Any fix available? I did a backup prior to the new installs.

    Installed Yosemite and iPhoto 9.6. A lot of my photos are now too dark and the colour is way off from the originals. Any suggestions to correct this mess. I did a backup prior to installing Yosemite and iPhoto 9.6.

    Check the monitor settings in the System/Displays/Color preference pane.  You may have to change the color profile used or calibrate the monitor. 
    Also check the System/Accessibility preference pane to see if the Increase contrast checkbox is checked. If it is check it and see if there's any improvement.

  • Recently my PDF files have printed too dark.  Has something changed in the software?

    Why do my PDF files print too dark? 

    2many2cho0se wrote:
    Yes...I know iMessage is supposed to be where there is wifi...
    Actually, all iMessage requires is a data connection, & that data connection can be either WiFi or 3G.

  • I have a Mac Book Pro 17 which starts but the screen is too dark to see. I have an external monitor connected but no signal. I need help. Thanks.

    I have Mac Book Pro 17 which starts but the display is too dark to see. I have separate display connected, but no signal to it. I need help. Thanks.

    The tv is a extended display on your mac like a second moitor you want to mirror them (same thing on both)
    This should help you

  • Illustrator PDFs print correctly from PC, but print too dark from Macs

    Photoshop and Illustrator PDF files (CS5 & 6) print correctly from my work PC, but not either of my Macs. See below:
    At work, I have a Dell PC and an iMac, at home I have a MacBook Pro.
    At work there is a big office color Ricoh printer for the Dell and iMac, at home I have a Epson 3-in-one laserjet for the MacBook Pro.
    Both the work and home Macs will print  Illustrator/Photoshop PDFs very dark/undersaturated/off color on their relative printers, but the work PC prints them correctly.
    At work, If you hold up a print of a PDF file printed from the Dell PC, and one printed from the iMac, they are completely different looking - the Dell print matches the Dell and iMac screens, but the iMac print is very dark and dull.
    At work, when I open a Illustrator or Photoshop PDF on the work PC and send it to the Richo printer, it comes out perfectly matching the screen, but, if I open it on the iMac and send it to the Richo printer, it prints too dark/off color.
    These are the *exact* same PDF files I am opening on both the PC and the iMac - our files are saved on a server so I'm accessing the same documents on both machines.
    Also, I create the files on the iMac and save them to the server on the iMac, but if I open them on the iMac it prints too dark, and if I open them on the PC, it prints correctly.
    At home on the MacBook Pro, the prints are also much darker than the screen (despite color calibration with a ColorMunki as well as following all Epson's color calibration steps) and I see a similar color problem as printing to the work printer from the work iMac.
    Someone please tell me this is just a printer profile thing and I can go in somewhere on my Macs and switch something so they print the same as the PC does!
    Thank you in advance for explaining why my Macs are making me pull out my hair!

    the iMac it prints too dark
    your print space is off on the Mac
    or you are applying the wrong source profile or both
    on the MacBook Pro, the prints are also much darker than the screen (despite color calibration
    EDIT: sorry i misread that as your monitor was also dark, if the mac displays the problem doc proper, you are targeting a bad print space, that's where i would look... 
    you app is apply the wrong source profile (or your monitor profile is off)
    basing the source>print space conversion on the wrong source profile could account for your printing woes
    be sure you are embedding an ICC profile in your doc, are opening it in a color-managed app, and it should display properly
    be sure your workflow uses the embedded profile and your printer is setup to convert to the proper printer profile
    color management theory
    epson workflow

  • Streaming Video, iTunes rentals are too dark.  Help!

    Using a 2013 Macbook Air, pretty much fully loaded.
    I'm noticing that movies purchased on iTunes, as well as Handbrake rips of my own DVDS, and streaming through both Amazon Prime and Netflix, using MS Silverlight and Quicktime... all videos are too dark.  Or rather, the shadows, and blacks are all too dark.  I have worked with display calibration and am convinced that calibration is not the real issue here.  While using my photo editing software, Lightroom 3, there are no such problems.  It is only the video playback.
    Is anyone else having the same issue?  I had a 2012 MB Air which didn't seem to have this problem as badly as this one. 
    Looking for solutions. 
    Thanks!

    I have gone through calibration.  Please note that other applications, such as Lightroom appear as they should.  I also have a spyder, and though I haven't calibrated this monitor, the fact that non-video applications are appearing as they should tells me that the problem is probably with the application running the video playback, or something do to with the video processor.  Also note that the problem occurs with both Amazon streaming, Netflix, and videos ripped with Handbrake, and that it occurs with MS Silverlight, Quicktime and with VLC player. 
    I read some discussion streams from 2012 with the same problem, and calibration was not the issue.  I have tried every built in display profile, manually gone through calibration in "expert" mode, etc... I just don't think this is the real issue.  Nor does it appear to be a hardware issue.  At least not the monitor.  Other applications are working just fine.

  • Ipod 4th gen. screen too dark, adjusting brightness does not help

    lost ipod for a few weeks. When found screen is too dark.  If you hold it in the light just right you can see everything and it works, you just cant see it.

    That actually happened to my friend. But he literally took the screen off and then did something in the inside but I'm not sure what he did. But yeah it should be something on the inside of the screen.

  • Mac Printing Pics Too Dark

    Weird and Complex.
    Document in Word (for Mac) using images from internet (jpg, png, monochrome and colour - from various NASA, JPL and other sources).  Printing Word .docx is fine.  Export document to PDF (using in-built Mac OS X PDF Print system) and PDF on screen is fine.  Print PDF using Mac Preview and it appears fine (colour a bit richer than .docx but OK).  Print from Windows Adobe Reader, same as Mac Preview app.  But print from Mac Adobe Reader (9.3.0) and the pictures come out as though the contrast is massively turned-up - monochrome pics far too dark and with a blue tint and colour pics darker and way OTT blue tint.  This is destroying the pictures as the colour (and particularly blue) is very significant in the scientific pictures.
    Pictures are from many different sources and jpg and png so I have not doctored them in any way - and the .docx prints fine.
    When printing from Adobe Reader I have tried with Printer managing the colour and with ColourSync enabled (automatic profile) and it makes no difference.  It appears just Adobe Reader on Mac that is the problem.
    (As it on print only I cannot post samples to illustrate - if important I could scan the bad rint but that would probably adjust things further)
    Update additional info: Pictures are either 8 bit RGB or grey scale (8 bit).  Some have embedded ColoyrSync profiles (e.g. sRGB IEC61966-2.1 or Generic RGB Profile or Dot Gain 20%) some have no embedded profile - all come out badly and all affected.  I tried using Photoshop to add a profile to one of the images without a profile and it made no difference.  Printing from Photoshop (CS4) is fine (including photos without profiles - comes out same as printing original .docx)  If I import the pages into Photoshop and print them they come out fine - just as printing the .docx - so I think there is nothing wrong with the PDF but it looks like it is the Adobe Reader printing.
    Any ideas.
    Many thanks
    Simon

    Welcome to the Apple Discussions. Check the display calibration and see if the gamma is set to 2.2 or 1.8. If it's set at 2.2 then set it to the Mac standard 1.8. See if that will lighten them up. Also check to make sure if you print one of the photos it will also match the display.
    TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto (iPhoto.Library for iPhoto 5 and earlier) database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
    I've created an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. It's compatible with iPhoto 6 and 7 libraries and Tiger and Leopard. iPhoto does not have to be closed to run the application, just idle. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.

  • Captured video-material appears far too dark

    hi there!
    I have a great problem (being under time-pressure with a project): video-material, taken with a canon HV30, that looks all right on the camera-screen, appears FAR TOO DARK (not usable), after beeing captured. the problem does not seem to be a premiere-problem (I have CS3), since windows movie maker produces the same fault. it is neither a pc-screen-calibration or -regulation-problem, since the same material played onto the same screen by another pc, that displays everthing else perfectly, is also too dark. the answer must be between the cam-corder and the capturing software? does someone have a clue? (the problem seems to be not only mine if you check via google... and the solution seems not to be at hand...)
    I'm working with DV-widescreen(16:9)-PAL-material converting it with 16-bit sound and 48 kHz.
    following my relevant systems-data... (everything is updated with the most recent drivers...)
    thanks very much indeed in advance!
    hilmar
    System Information
    Time of this report: 11/21/2008, 23:54:29
    Machine name: PC02
    Operating System: Windows XP Professional (5.1, Build 2600) Service Pack 2 (2600.xpsp_sp2_gdr.080814-1233)
    Language: German (Regional Setting: German)
    System Manufacturer: MAXDATA
    System Model: *
    BIOS: Default System BIOS
    Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 4400 @ 2.00GHz (2 CPUs)
    Memory: 2048MB RAM
    Page File: 766MB used, 3172MB available
    Windows Dir: C:\WINDOWS
    DirectX Version: DirectX 9.0c (4.09.0000.0904)
    DX Setup Parameters: Not found
    DxDiag Version: 5.03.2600.2180 32bit Unicode
    DxDiag Notes
    DirectX Files Tab: No problems found.
    Display Tab 1: No problems found.
    Sound Tab 1: No problems found.
    Music Tab: No problems found.
    Input Tab: No problems found.
    Network Tab: No problems found.
    DirectX Debug Levels
    Direct3D: 0/4 (n/a)
    DirectDraw: 0/4 (retail)
    DirectInput: 0/5 (n/a)
    DirectMusic: 0/5 (n/a)
    DirectPlay: 0/9 (retail)
    DirectSound: 0/5 (retail)
    DirectShow: 0/6 (retail)
    Display Devices
    Card name: NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS
    Manufacturer: NVIDIA
    Chip type: GeForce 8600 GTS
    DAC type: Integrated RAMDAC
    Device Key: Enum\PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0400&SUBSYS_040110B0&REV_A1
    Display Memory: 256.0 MB
    Current Mode: 1280 x 1024 (32 bit) (60Hz)
    Monitor: (Standardmonitor)
    Monitor Max Res:
    Driver Name: nv4_disp.dll
    Driver Version: 6.14.0011.7824 (English)
    DDI Version: 9 (or higher)
    Driver Attributes: Final Retail
    Driver Date/Size: 10/7/2008 13:33:00, 6058112 bytes
    WHQL Logo'd: Yes
    WHQL Date Stamp: n/a
    VDD: Nicht zutreffend
    Mini VDD: nv4_mini.sys
    Mini VDD Date: 10/7/2008 13:33:00, 6133856 bytes
    Device Identifier: {D7B71E3E-4740-11CF-906D-0A2400C2CB35}
    Vendor ID: 0x10DE
    Device ID: 0x0400
    SubSys ID: 0x040110B0
    Revision ID: 0x00A1
    Revision ID: 0x00A1
    Video Accel: ModeMPEG2_C ModeMPEG2_D ModeWMV9_B ModeWMV9_A
    Deinterlace Caps: {6CB69578-7617-4637-91E5-1C02DB810285}: Format(In/Out)=(YUY2,YUY2) Frames(Prev/Fwd/Back)=(0,0,0) Caps=VideoProcess_YUV2RGB VideoProcess_StretchX VideoProcess_StretchY DeinterlaceTech_PixelAdaptive
    {335AA36E-7884-43A4-9C91-7F87FAF3E37E}: Format(In/Out)=(YUY2,YUY2) Frames(Prev/Fwd/Back)=(0,0,0) Caps=VideoProcess_YUV2RGB VideoProcess_StretchX VideoProcess_StretchY DeinterlaceTech_BOBVerticalStretch
    {6CB69578-7617-4637-91E5-1C02DB810285}: Format(In/Out)=(UYVY,YUY2) Frames(Prev/Fwd/Back)=(0,0,0) Caps=VideoProcess_YUV2RGB VideoProcess_StretchX VideoProcess_StretchY DeinterlaceTech_PixelAdaptive
    {335AA36E-7884-43A4-9C91-7F87FAF3E37E}: F

    thanks,
    dear craig,
    for your thoughts and tips!
    I will do that just for curiosity. but then I would have to know how the waveform-scopes should ideally look like? where can I find model-scopes? (and, what's more, the camera "gave up its spirit", as we say in german: can't be switched on any more - brand new... so I'll have to get it fixed...)
    but: it seems to me, that your path-finding leads in the wrong direction... see: the camera records pictures digitally on a tape. from the tape it is able to read the data again out onto a screen - and fine! now: you should be able to reproduce that outside the camera - and not blame it somehow...
    others seem to have the same problem with different cameras and different systems-cominations (operating system, graphic cards...). so it can't be just my camera. the problem is not so easy...
    the guy here - http://forum.videohelp.com/topic281706.html - seems to aim in the right direction (imho): he touches the point of the colour-spaces used! he says inside the camcorder IRE 0.0 / 16-235 color space is used. right? well: outside the cam on a computer-screen RGB or sRGB is used, right? so some transformation has to happen - or may be, it is not done - with the bad result, we have...
    now the chap there speaks about the possibly wrong codecs. a codec however has to do with compression/decompression. but - they say - the capturing via firewire is just the unaltered transmission of data, and .avi (the resulting format) is compression-free! so the problem is not a codec-problem. but how's the software called that changes the color-spaces or should change them???
    what astonished me very much is to see that, when I change the screen-settings for color/luminance with my nvidia-graphics-card, then everything on the screen changes exept! the to video-images in the two screens (source, program) in premiere... so premiere seems to use its own screen-controle here!
    and why actually can't I choose somewhere which the output-conditions for and after the capturing shall be, e.g. the clip-format (.avi, .mov etc.) and - may be! - the color-space! I can just say "DV 25i PAL max. bit-depth" and, under device(=cam)-controle, brand and type of device (and again PAL). now I can choose "canon" but not "HV30" (not contained in the list) - just "standard" instead. but that raises the question: what colour-space are the various cameras using and sending??
    now if I check the supported camera-brands and -types online on the adobe-website (http://www.adobe.com/products/premiere/dvhdwrdb.html) I can't find canon's HV30 (just the semi-pro-models, for which "conditional support" is promised... but problems seem to lay elsewhere).
    on the website, where you can check the compatibility of your cam with premiere, adobe boasts its "Preconfigured solutions
    Certified Adobe OpenHD configurations (that) help ensure compatibility between hardware and software components." if you click on the linked text some general boasting and buy exhortations about the "creative suite" come up - no precise information...
    should this well known and ill suffered compatibility problem not be handled more clearly and competently?
    please help me finding the solution, which is: to interprete the recorded data on the tape, that get transferred via capturing, like the camera does!
    thanks a lot indeed!
    hilmar
    ps: it is interesting to check http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_space, where it says: "YIQ was formerly used in NTSC (North America, Japan and elsewhere) television broadcasts for historical reasons. This system stores a luminance value with two chrominance values, corresponding approximately to the amounts of blue and red in the color. It is similar to the YUV scheme used in most video capture systems[2] and in PAL (Australia, Europe, except France, which uses SECAM) television, except that the YIQ color space is rotated 33° with respect to the YUV color space. ...
    " you see: two different color spaces in TV and CAPTURE SYSTEMS! is premiere not a capture system?? and what do the graphics-devices underway between the camera and premiere??

Maybe you are looking for

  • PNP standard screen Reporting period

    Hi All, The PNP standard screen has a parameter Reporting period. Could anyone please explain that if I select a Key date then what will this date be matched against in the database? Will it be the begda of an infotype? Also, same with selecting "oth

  • Prevent Site Members to view Site Contents Page in SharePoint 2013

    I created SharePoint 2013 Site and it has 5 variation sub sites as well. Each site has several pages. I have end users added to Site Members group who should access all the Custom pages. Customer has raised a security issue, end users are able to acc

  • Mac mini doesn't play new DVDs

    My Mac mini has a DVD drive but doesn't play new movies

  • Can't update Premiere Pro CC

    Hi, Premiere Pro CC won't update any more, returning error U44M1P7 Windows 7 x64 is fully up to date, as is the CC desktop app. Please help!

  • Re-post: iMac with Mavericks loses internet connection (browsers only)

    I posted this question a while ago. Noone answered. I'll try again since this is now becoming VERY annoying...   I have a very strange issue. My 21.5" mid 2011 iMac with Mac OS X Mavericks 10.9 has, since upgrading to 10.9 (and now 10.9.1), started t