"Pentax Corporation" vs. "Pentax" for Lens Correction

I have a Pentax camera. Lens correction only displays me a few lenses. I found out that it only displays the lenses for the camera brand "Pentax Corporation" and not for "Pentax" in the raw converter. In "Filters->Lens Correction" I can change it. Is it possible to manually change to the other data set? I have Photoshop CS5.
Thanks for the help

The camera is a Pentax *ist DS. In Camera Raw drop down only PENTAX appears with only the standard lense 18-55 mm. When opening pictures in Photoshop and going to Filter->Lens Correction, there is the choize between camera model "Pentax Corporation" with only that standard lense and then there is "Pentax" with a much more complete collection of lenses.
If I download additional profiles they appear in Filter->Lens Correction but not in the initial Camera Raw.
There is no change between jpg and raw pictures.
How can I tell Camera Raw to take all that lenses? Is there a path set wrong? Maybe the two "libraries" can be combined.
Thank you

Similar Messages

Lightroom 5.2 is not identifying my sigma 35 mm 1.4 for lens correction anymore.

Lightroom 5.2 is not identifying my sigma 35 mm 1.4 for lens correction anymore. It was working fine last week. Any ideas what's happening?

Indeed the pictures I'm looking at now are Jpeg. My other canon lenses are picked up for profile correction though but the sigma 35 isn't. Thanks a lot! I thought something was wrong somewhere but it all makes sense now.

Where do I get Lens Profile for lens correction in LR3

I have LR3 and need help figuring something out. I mainly shoot with a Tamron 24-70mm. LR3 doesn't list this lens under the lens correction so I can't correct any of the lens distortion. Anyone know where/how I can locate/install this profile? Do I get this from Adobe, Tamron, etc?

There are three Tamron 24-70 lens profiles, but all were added to the LR 4.x series:
http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/multi/lens-profile-support-lightroom-4.html
So the obvious solution is to upgrade your LR to 5.x for $80, or sign up for PS-CC+LR5 bundle at $10/month (for a limited time).
A more complicated way to get these profiles is to install the latest DNG Converter which includes all lens profiles, then copy the lens profiles you need over to the third-party lens profile under your Users folder and LR 3 should pick them up, assuming that folder hasn’t changed places between LR3 and LR5.
I am not a Mac person, but on Windows, the DNG Converter installed profiles would be under:
C:\ProgramData\Adobe\CameraRaw\LensProfiles\1.0\Tamron
And the place to put them is:
C:\Users\yourusername\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\CameraRaw\LensProfiles\1.0\downloaded
AppData is a hidden folder so you just have to type it into the Explore address area and hit Enter or turn on hidden folders in Explorer or type %APPDATA% in Explorer and hit Enter will get you down to the Roaming folder.
You can find the latest DNG Converter at: http://www.adobe.com/downloads/updates

When will Lightroom have a profile for the Parrot Bebop Drone for lens correction?

Just wondering if and when Lightroom will add a lens correction profile for the Parrot Bebop Drone.

The Parrot Bebop Drone camera and lens is not likely to be supported by Adobe.
https://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/multi/lens-profile-support-lightroom-4.html
It appears to use a fisheye lens and in-camera processing or provided software to rectilinear "correct" the image. What specifically are you trying to correct with the LR Lens Profile tool? This will help us provide other suggestions to accomplish your objectives.

Need Profile for Lens Correction Filter

I have a Nikon D5000. How do I get the correct lens profile so I can use it in the Lens Correction filter?

Profiles are not specific to a camera body, they are specific to a lens model and a sensor size (i.e. a profile for one model of lens will work on all the DX crop-sensor Nikon cameras).

Can't find Nikon 24-120 lens in profiles for Lens Correction. How is this added?

Lens Correction panel in LR
enter correct make--NIKON, but model of my Nikon 24-120 lens does not appear
How can this be remedied. It is on the list of suported lenses.
I do not wnat to make a custom profile. Just use the Nikon
Thanks
Mitch Cantor

Thanks...figured it out.
Have to open a file taken with that lens. Go to Filter in PS and choose
³Lens Correction²
Choose lens there and it will then get registered in LR.
Appreciate your reply.
Mitch

Why does LR 4 not recognize Sigma lenses (NEX 7) automatically in Develo module for lens corrections

In Lightroom 4.6, "enabling lens profile" in the Develop module works perfectly for Sony lenses with NEX ARW files (NEX 7).
When i use Sigma lenses instead, nothing happens although "enable profile corrections " is ticked, no matter what is set next: auto, custom, or default....
I am getting tired to always have to fill in the 3 Lens Profile questions (but only for Sigma lenses) with 1: Sigma, then 2: search the lens in Lightroom's long Sigma list and click, and finally 3: hope it takes.
I am assuming that Lightroom reads the Metadata (where the Sigma and Sony lenses are fully described, I have checked!), but does not cooperate with Sigma, while Sony lenses work so well.
Why is that so and how can I get the proper lens profile automatically if the lens does have its own Adobe profile loaded?
Frustrated ...

Why is that so and how can I get the proper lens profile automatically if the lens does have its own Adobe profile loaded?
Frustrated ...
Pick the correct lens manually then choose 'Save New Lens Profile Defaults' from Setup drop down menu. Lr should remember the lens and use it as the default in future. See screenshot below

When will Tamron 16-300mm for Sony be supported for lens correction?

In the list of supported lenses for LR I can only find Tamron 16-300mm for Nikon and Canon but not for Sony. It is the same lens, so why isn't it supported yet? And when will it be?
Thanks!

Isn't there anyone who can help answering my questions? Thanks!

Photoshop CS6 No lens profiles (lens correction filter) for Canon 6D raw files

LightRoom and Camera Raw have profiles for Lens Correction and all the current available lens are in the list for the Canon 6D raw files. BUT the Filter/Lens Correction when in Photoshop CS6 only have 2 Tamron lens listed. Odd that there are lens profiles for the Canon 6D raw files in Lightroom and Camera RAW but not CS6 Filter/Lens Correction.
Camera RAW, LR and PS are up to date..... NOTE: I have a Canon 7D, G11 and 1D Mark II N and all their files work as expected. It's only RAW files created by the Canon 6D.
Any suggestions.

To the right of where it says Search Criteria, click the little three-bars-arrow icon and uncheck Match Sensor Size and it should find more.

LR 3.3 - Olympus E-5 Support for Raw-Format, Lens Correction Profiles for Zuiko Lenses

Ich wish strongly Olympus E-5 Support for Raw-Format for Ligtroom 3.3,... and i wait since ages for Lens Correction Profiles of Zuiko Lenses ;-)) There are plenty of Olympus users who yearn for that :-)
Will Release 3.3 support this?

Hi,
LR3.3 is released today, and it has support for Olympus E-5 added to it. Details of it can be found here;
http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2010/12/lightroom-3-3-and-camera-raw-6-3-now-avail able.html
and the new version of LR3.3 can be downloaded here;
http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/cameraraw.html

Lens correction help needed: Nikon 14-24 used in model shoot...

Hello,
I just finished a model shoot with 9 models standing in a horizontal line relative to the camera. Because of the very short working distance I had to use a Nikon 14-24mm lens to fit everyone in, resulting in the end girls being noticeably distorted (unpleasantly "wide"). They certainly won't like that!
I've opened the raw file in CR, but have not found settings for lens correction that fix this. CR has the correct lens profile, but no matter how I play with the settings manually or automatically, things just don't look right. Similarly, if I open corresponding TIFF in Filter -> Lens correction, I still run into the same issue.
I've enclosed a sample out-of-the-camera image so you can what I'm talking about. Hoping there's a way to correct the twp outermost girls w/o sacrificing those in the middle... They are much slimmer than in the shot.
Running PS CS 5.5 on Win7/64
Thanks!
Jerry

Hi Toasted
I've seen the adds for the DxO Viewpoint and thought they had a great idea on their hands providing it as a Plug-in. However, I've been using the full DxO Optics Pro as my Raw file editor for a couple of years now, and ran your shot through that, and not the plug-in.
Judging my my results, I think the full version is a more powerful tool; the "Volume Anamorphosis" correction in the full version is a semi-automated tool. Simply applying the correction at the initial automated setting still left me with some distortion in the models at either end, which was especially noticeable in the girl on the extreme right. However, I then manually tweaked the setting to the maximum available, to get the result above.
Now, there's no such thing as a free lunch, and you can't get something for nothing, and the same applies here. What's actually happening is that the Volume Anamorphosis is being "corrected" by re-introducing a set amount of Barrel Distortion into the image, oh, and the image has also been cropped, which is most noticeable in the bodywork of the cars on the left and right, but this is unavoidable. It isn't too obvious here, but if you were to have strong horizontals or verticals in the image, you'd see the curvature in them very easily.
Take a look at my own example below.
This was taken with a Tokina 11-16mm f2.8, and in the original the guitarist on the left, and the keyboardist on the right, both had the dreaded "squished head" effect! As you can see that's been fixed, but if you look at the pipes above the lights at the back, the line of the monitor cabinet at the lead singers feet, and the microphone stands, you can plainly see the curves... which is still infinitely preferable to distorted heads!
Good luck
Paul

ACR 6.1 vs DXO Lens Correction?

I have been experimenting with the lens correction module in ACR 6.1, which has profiles for two lenses I own, the Nikkor AF-S 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5 G and the Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 G IF-ED VR, and am quite pleased with the results. The 18-70 lens is a decent consumer grade zoom that has good resolution and little chromatic aberration, but which suffers from distortion at the wide end and vignetting at large apertures. From visual onscreen editing, the vignetting is completely removed from the images and the barrel distortion at wide angle settings is sufficiently well controlled that thus far I have seen no need for manual touching up of the distortion correction.
DxO (an Adobe rival) has criticized the ACR module as offering undercorrection of distortion and vignetting under some conditions, suggesting that the Adobe profiling procedures are not sufficiently rigorous. That may be so, but thus far I have seen no major defects and they gave no examples and I am wondering what the experience of other ACR users might be.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/1005/10052001adobedxoensprofile.asp
The 70-200 zoom was highly regarded for use with APS sized sensors, but full frame users have noted an alarming degree of softenss in the corners of the image. With ACR, one could attempt to provide extra sharpening at the edges of the image with an adjustment brush, but DXO claims to automatically correct for uneven sharpness across the image field. They don't say how this is achieved, but the web site explanation hints at something more sophisticated than a variable unsharp mask (perhaps a variable deconvoluiton algorithm) and I would be interested how this works out in practice.

I hardly know where to start!
Anyway, looking at the list of available lenses, the list for Photoshop Nikon optics is extensive, and also has at least one error. The list for ACR is far less, and my principal lens isn't present. The problem with that item is that, if you choose Custom and your lens isn't on the list, it reverts to the first lens on the list and corrects the image for that. In Auto, it tells you it isn't on the list, so I would urge the use of Auto at all times when operating with commercially available lenses.
In PSCS5, my basic lens also is not present; (18 to 105 mm), but there is a lens, 18 to 125 which is not in the Nikon line. This appears to be an error. Is this the 18 to 105?
I have serious reservations with the idea of "Photographer Empowerment" with respect to lens corrections. I hope that if you publish this data it is in it's own category to which I can ignore. Lens measurement, data collection and conclusions is an intense activity and is best left to the professionals as is photo editing software. DXO knows what they are doing. The concept of "Photographer Empowerment" indicates to me Adobe does not know what it is doing. This makes me very nervous, to say the least.
Let me give you an example. I ran an image from my 70 to 300mm lens, which is on the charts, through both DXO and ACR 6.1, then set one over the other in Layers. Switching back and forth showe a vast difference in the correction for barrel/pincushion and vignetting. Which is right?
FYI, I always have two sets of raw data when anticipating running the DXO corrections so that there is no preconditioning by either party when running such tests. Also, I use DXO only for lens correction activities. Their RAW converter, imo, cannot compare to even CS3, for reasons I won't go into here. There are cheaper programs for doing barrel, vignette and such, but DXO also provides corrections for other lens errors, which makes it well worth while.
To answer my own question is that, in architectural photos, DXO is on the money. The only way to tell for sure is an optical setup that is precise and repeatable.
Finally, here is a site that uses the DXO software to provide lens tests that are extensive and comprehensive, all for the practicing photographer. Using their data for inclusion in the ACR correction would be a good start, not Photographer Empowerment.
http://www.slrgear.com/reviews/index.php
I use them once I have narrowed down the field to a few lenses and haven't been disappointed.

LR 3, Pshop CS3 and lens corrections: wha'?

Perform lens corrections in LR3. Open in Photoshop CS3.
And the lens corrections are not applied. Repeatable.
Right now I'm having to finish the PSD, the syncing the (ignored) lens corrections from the raw file to the PSD.
Where's the hidden Do What I Asked command for lens corrections?

Hm. I would assume that LR3's engine would render the PSD, then open it in Pshop.
Because (thanks to your note) I see that I can export a righteously-rendered PSD and, as a post-process, have it open in Pshop immediately.
Thanks, Lee Jay.
David

Lens correction bug, bad artifacts with contrast adjustments...

Something has changed between LR3 and LR4 in the processing chain for lens corrections. Doing an extreme correction (e.g. using a LCP for a fisheye lens) with increased contrast causes bad halos at contrast edges. The effect doesn't occur with the same settings on LR3. It is almost as if the LCP is being applied after the basic controls rather than before?!?!?!?!
Ken

So I did a bit more checking. It is actually the highlights slider that does it - contrast just makes it more obvious. It is as if the highlights "masking" is getting created in the pre-transformed data and then distorted in some way when going through and extreme LCP like with a fish-eye. Here is an example, contrast at 100 and the "Strong Contrast" tone curve used in both. The one of the left has highlights at 100. Notice the "shadows" in the sky of the leaves, as if the mask was somehow stretched differently from the image data. This was with a fisheye lens and fisheye LCP. You can actually recreate the problem to a degree yourself with any image. Just apply any of the fisheye lens profiles from Adobe (Nikon 10.5mm for example) and look at high contrast regions near the edges of the frame with highlights set to 100%. You'll see shadows like this (again, easier to see with extreme contrast settings). Without an extreme profile applied no such effect.

Lens Correction not happening in RAW with PSE 10

My Camera is in the list a FinePix HS10, I have done all the updates that are available.
I tried doing searches but nothing came up that I could find a solution to this.
When I shoot a raw+jpg of an item with straight lines (edges of a painting) the JPG version has the lens distortion corrected, however the raw does not and shows curves where there should be straight lines. When I go to Camera Calibration screen it shows Process 2010 (current) and Camera profile shows Adobe Standard. There are no additional Camera Profiles listed.
I am at a loss as to what to do to resolve this and have the RAW compensate for the lens distortion and end up like the JPG file. Is my camera supposed to show up in Camera Profiles? This would be horrible if not being able to be corrected so I must be doing something wrong or missed a step.

Elements using the Camera Raw plug-in doesn’t allow for lens-corrections. Since you’ve posted your question in the Elements forum, is that what you’re using? The much more expensive regular Photoshop hosting the camera-raw plug-in and the less-expensive Lightroom do allow selecting lens profile corrections.
The Camera Calibration area you refer to only deals with raw camera profiles for color rendition, not lens profiles that would correct geometric distortion.
A more fundamental question is whether there are actually lens-distortion-correction profiles for a FinePix HS10. Usually Adobe supplies lens profiles for most Canon and Nikon DSLRs although there are a few others for other brands and types of camera, with a Fuji point-and-shoot having less chance of having a lens-profile created by Adobe.
There is an Adobe Lens Profile Downloader tool for getting third-party lens-profiles and checking it just now, it appears there is a raw profile for the FinePix HS10/HS11 built-in lens, but you still need to be using an Adobe product other than Elements to apply such a profile.

"Pentax Corporation" vs. "Pentax" for Lens Correction

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for