PeopleSoft SES Configuration issue (PT:8.53.04 and Application HCM:9.2)

Hi all
I have installed and configured PeopleSoft SES in my own machine.But When I am going to search anything through PIA I am getting issue. One issue is describing below:( Issue for any kind of search)
I have searched with keyword "corporate" in my PIA page and all the link came and  After that I have clicked any link like her I clicked "Career Plan - Cynthia Adams | Empl ID: KU0101".
But the page is not opening. Can anybody please tell me the solution?
My Machine Specification:
PeopleTools 8.53.04
Application : HCM 9.2
OS: Windows 7 64 Bit
Database: Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
Regards,
Snehasish

Pls change Contenent URI Text and Portal URI Text of all the relevand locl nodes (portal tab).  Re-generate the search indexes after doing this. You may to at least do this for PSFT_HR and HRMS nodes.

Similar Messages

  • Peopletools 8.52 and SES configuration

    Hi all,
    This is a fresh SES installation with Demo database Peopletools 8.52 and HCM 9.1. With RDBMS Oracle 11.2.0.3.0 (unicode database).
    I downloaded the software from edelivery and installed complete installation using the reference guide.
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E26530_01/psft/acrobat/PeopleTools_8.52_Installation_Oracle.pdf
    Configuring Integration Between PeopleSoft PeopleTools and Oracle SES
    After performing all the steps in the chapter, It failed in the verification when performing the peopletools> search framework > administration> diagnostics
    It fails in deployment stage.
    Undeploying. Cleaning up any data previous run
    Undeploy completed
    Deploying search definition
    Exception caught while adding peoplesoft source SES Login Failed. Error with IdentityPlugin.validateUser:
    oracle.search.sdk.common.PluginException: oracle.j2ee.ws.saaj.ContentTypeException: Not a valid SOAP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
    at oracle.search.plugin.security.identity.psft.PsftIdentityPlugin.validateUser(PsftIdentityPlugin.java:334)
    at oracle.search.query.internal.AuthnTask.run(AuthnTask.java:136)
    (262,129)
    I saw one support article 1478247.1 and verified the password are same in Peoplesoft and SES. But still seeing the error.
    E-SES: Getting "Exception Caught While Adding PeopleSoft Source SES Login Failed. (262,129)" During Round-Trip Test [ID 1478247.1]
    Also I created a SR with Oracle support, As this one is not in Production, it may take few days to address. If anyone had similar issues and resolved, please respond. Thanls.

    Hi
    Have a look this blog and see if you have missed any steps:
    http://bloggingaboutoracleapplications.org/peoplesoft-oracle-secure-enterprise-search-ses/
    Like the MOS doc says your already found verify if you use the correct password in PeopleSoft and SES for the Federated trusted entity.
    Also after I had configured PeopleSoft & SES, I was able to deploy the search indexes, but no search results were returned regardless of what I was searching.
    My issue was that I had defined the HTTPS target location on the service configuration whereas PIA was not configured for HTTPS.
    Feed framework was sending the header in HTTP, but the search details were defined as HTTPS.
    After removing the HTTPS target location in PeopleSoft and rebuilding the search index I was able to get search result.
    Hope this helps.
    Hakan

  • Peopletools 8.53 and SES configuration

    Hi All
    I have configured Peoplesoft SES as per all the documents shared by everybody in my own machine. But I am facing one issue after search I am not able to go that component.
    can you please tell me what is the reason behind this?
    PeopleTools : 8.53.04
    Application : HCM 9.2
    Machine : Windows 7 64 Bit

    In case you come back here - make sure that the HRMS node in Integration Broker has the Portal tab configured with the URI, same as your local node. There is an entry on MOS mentioning this (sometimes wotu will see an error in the lower left of the browser status bar, sometimes not, but clicking a link returned on the search won't do anything).
    Barring that, also make sure that both the SES master user doing the crawl and the oprid you are using to search has access to the page and data.

  • SharePoint Foundation 2013 - Search Configuration Issue - 2 App Servers and 2 Front-End Servers

    Hi, 
    We have a SharePoint Foundation 2013 with SP1 Environment. 
    In that, we have 2 Front-End Servers and 2 App Servers. In the Front-End Servers, the Search Service is stopped and is in Disabled state and in the 2 App Servers in One App Server, Search is Online and in another Search is Starting but goes to Stopped sooon
    after.
    Originally, we had only 1 App Server and we were running our Search Service and Search Service Application in that. Now since the index location became full and we were unable to increase the drive there, we added one more App Server and now the issue is
    Search is not properly getting configured in either of these App servers. What we want to do is run Search only in the new App Server, because we have a lot of storage space for Index locations here, but in the older App Server, not run Search at all.  We
    tried keeping the Search Service disabled and ran the below PowerShell Scripts, but none of the ones are working. These scripts are creating the Search Service Application, but the error of "Admin Component is not Online", "Could not connect
    to the machine hosting SharePoint 2013 admin component" is coming up. 
    http://www.funwithsharepoint.com/provision-search-for-sharepoint-foundation-2013-using-powershell-with-clean-db-names/
    http://blog.falchionconsulting.com/index.php/2013/02/provisioning-search-on-sharepoint-2013-foundation-using-powershell/
    http://blog.ciaops.com/2012/12/search-service-on-foundation-2013.html
    Can I get some help please?
    Karthick S

    Hi Karthick,
    For your issue, could you provide the
    detail error message of ULS log  to determine the exact cause of the error?
    For SharePoint 2013, by default, ULS log is at      
    C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\15\LOGS
    For troubleshooting your issue,  you can try to run the SharePoint Products Configuration Wizard on your WFE servers and run the script for configuring the search service on SharePoint
    Foundation:
    [string]$farmAcct = "DOMAIN\service_Account"
    [string]$serviceAppName = "Search Service Application"
    Function WriteLine
    Write-Host -ForegroundColor White "--------------------------------------------------------------"
    Function ActivateAndConfigureSearchService
    Try
    # Based on this script : http://blog.falchionconsulting.com/index.php/2013/02/provisioning-search-on-sharepoint-2013-foundation-using-powershell/
    Write-Host -ForegroundColor White " --> Configure the SharePoint Foundation Search Service -", $env:computername
    Start-SPEnterpriseSearchServiceInstance $env:computername
    Start-SPEnterpriseSearchQueryAndSiteSettingsServiceInstance $env:computername
    $appPool = Get-SPManagedAccount -Identity $farmAcct
    New-SPServiceApplicationPool -Name SeachApplication_AppPool -Account $appPool -Verbose
    $saAppPool = Get-SPServiceApplicationPool -Identity SeachApplication_AppPool
    $svcPool = $saAppPool
    $adminPool = $saAppPool
    $searchServiceInstance = Get-SPEnterpriseSearchServiceInstance $env:computername
    $searchService = $searchServiceInstance.Service
    $bindings = @("InvokeMethod", "NonPublic", "Instance")
    $types = @([string],
    [Type],
    [Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPIisWebServiceApplicationPool],
    [Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPIisWebServiceApplicationPool])
    $values = @($serviceAppName,
    [Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Administration.SearchServiceApplication],
    [Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPIisWebServiceApplicationPool]$svcPool,
    [Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPIisWebServiceApplicationPool]$adminPool)
    $methodInfo = $searchService.GetType().GetMethod("CreateApplicationWithDefaultTopology", $bindings, $null, $types, $null)
    $searchServiceApp = $methodInfo.Invoke($searchService, $values)
    $searchProxy = New-SPEnterpriseSearchServiceApplicationProxy -Name "$serviceAppName - Proxy" -SearchApplication $searchServiceApp
    $searchServiceApp.Provision()
    catch [system.exception]
    Write-Host -ForegroundColor Yellow " ->> Activate And Configure Search Service caught a system exception"
    Write-Host -ForegroundColor Red "Exception Message:", $_.Exception.ToString()
    finally
    WriteLine
    ActivateAndConfigureSearchService
    Reference:
    https://sharepointpsscripts.codeplex.com/releases/view/112556
    Thanks,
    Eric
    Forum Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected].
    Eric Tao
    TechNet Community Support

  • Configuration Issue in User Mapping ..

    Hi,
    Pls help resolve this issue..
    When i go to <b>" UserMapping "</b> option using the <b>"Personalize "</b> link , i get the following error msg..
    "There is a configuration issue which leads to problem when accessing user mapping data for the selected backend system"
    Also , if i go thru "User Administration -> User Mapping "
    then it says,
    --"There is a configuration issue which leads to problem when accessing user mapping data for the selected backend system  .
    Usually reason is user mapping being configured for Strong encryption, but necessary additional files might be missing.Check Security log file for information "--
    I am not able to solve this problem..Pls help
    Thanks in advance

    Hi Venkat,
    <b>Here the quick and dirty solution</b>:
    In your portal go to 'System Administration' -> 'System Configuration' -> 'UM Configuration' -> 'Direct Editing'.
    There locate the parameter 'ume.usermapping.unsecure', set it to 'TRUE' and restart your server.
    I would rather recommend to install the unlimited strength jurisdiction policy files.
    For more info on this, check this thread:
    JCE Jurisdiction does not allow Portal to start
    Hope this helps,
    Robert

  • Configuration issue of syslog.conf

    Dear All,
    My client is facing a configuration issue of syslog.conf.
    They have set a cacti on a Linux server for monitoring of all servers snmp & syslog.
    The part of snmp has set up successfully but cannot send the syslog to the cacti.
    My client want the syslog can keep on the localhost and send to cacti for monitoring
    we have tried to do the following things for make it work:
    Insert the information (*.* @10.251.99.74) in /etc/syslog.conf
    Restart service of system-log
    Deleted all word of loghost in the /etc/hosts file
    But still not work. Anyone can give me suggestion or idea about this?

    Thank you for your reply.
    It is tab. But I think the problem is solaris cannot use *.* to represent all logs.
    I have used the following is work
    *.err;ker.debug;daemon.notice;mail.crit @10.251.99.74
    If that is not the mail reason, please put me right.

  • Anti-relay filter configuration issues

    Configuration issues with the anti-relay filter in Messaging Server 4.1x.
    The following information addresses common questions about configuration issues
    with the anti-relay filter in Messaging Server 4.1x:<BR>
    <P>
    <OL>
    <LI><B>Question:</B><BR>
    What is the difference between the delivery
    and submission
    options?<BR>
    <P>
    <B>Answer:</B><BR>
    The submission option
    allows specified users to send email to any email address in the world.
    These users are typically internal users.
    <P>
    The delivery option
    allows specified users to receive email from anybody. These users
    are also typically internal users.
    <P>
    A standard filter will appear something as follows:<BR>
    <P>
    # This is the anti-relay config file written by Jay at iPlanet
    # The first section sets default conditions
    resolvehostnames:0
    useauthinfo:0
    advertiseauthinfo:1
    # This section sets domains to be delivered to by anybody
    delivery:*@my.domain.com
    # This section sets domains that can send any place
    submission:129.12.4.*
    <P>
    <P>
    <LI><B>Question:</B><BR>
    The delivery
    option works properly. However, why doesn't the
    submission option
    appear to be allowing emails from specified users to pass through?
    <P>
    <B>Answer:</B><BR>
    The problem with the submission behavior could be due to the setting of the
    the resolvehostnames
    parameter. If this parameter is turned on
    (resolvehostnames:1),
    then <I>all</I> entries in this configuration file must be fully qualified
    host names. Although wildcards will work, you cannot specify IP
    addresses with this configuration setting.
    <P>
    <P>
    <LI><B>Question:</B><BR>
    Is it possible to allow people outside of my network to connect to the server
    and send mail out?
    <P>
    <B>Answer:</B><BR>
    Yes. To allow outside users to connect to the server and send mail
    to any address, without granting the same privilege to the rest of the world,
    activate the authenticated SMTP portion of the filter via the
    useauthinfo option.
    Setting this parameter to "1" (i.e., useauthinfo:1
    ) will require a user who is not in a
    submission address and who is attempting to send email to an address not in
    the delivery range to authenticate with a user ID and password.
    </OL>
    <P>
    For additional information on the anti-relay filter, please refer to the
    Messaging Server 4.1 Administrator's Guide at<BR>
    <P>
    http://docs.iplanet.com/docs/manuals/messaging/nms41/ag/ubefiltr.htm#1073677

    Prashant:
    Are you using a UBE filter to configure domain-based anti-relayinging? We had better luck with the anti-relay plug-in. There is some info on this (for 4.15) at
    http://docs.sun.com/source/816-6044-10/ubefiltr.htm#1069973
    You have to enable the plug-in using configutil, per the above. The anti-relay plug-in is controlled by antirelay.conf. Be aware that the pattern matching rules are very limited, and not well documented. Fortunately, the source code to the plug-in is included, and you can see what it is doing. To pass the tests we had to add a hard-coded test for a "%" in the source and recompile:
    *** antirelay.c.orig Thu Oct 31 04:42:13 2002
    --- antirelay.c Thu Oct 31 04:22:07 2002
    *** 934,939 ****
    --- 934,940 ----
    * Weight must be non-zero to begin with so that matches on just "*"
    * will work.
    + if( strchr(text,'%') != NULL ) return ABORT;
    weight = TRUE;
    for ( ; *p; text++, p++) {
    if (*text == '\0' && p != '')
    Not a really elegant hack, but we didn't need a fully functional regex engine.

  • Oracle 11g Fusion Middleware (11.1.1.3.0) Report Configuration Issue

    Oracle 11g Fusion Middleware (11.1.1.3.0) Report Configuration Issue
    =============================================
    Hi All,
    I have installed Oracle 11g Fusion Middleware (11.1.1.3.0) on Oracle Linux 5 and getting some issues while configuring. What's happening is that when I run my report, it looks for the library attached to it. If I define the REPORTS_PATH in reports.sh, it works fine.
    What I want to achieve is to push reports to use REPORTS_PATH environment variable from rwserver.conf instead of reports.sh
    Someone told me to remove the REPORTS_PATH from reports.sh and add the REPORTS_PATH from reports.sh to a default.env in rwserver.conf, but it didn't worked.
    What I know about the report server stuff in 11g Fusion Middleware is that it consists of two different servers (Standalone and In Process). Our application runs report using SRW.RUN_REPORT which basically use In Process report server setting in rwserver.conf to run the report.
    The heirarchy in which reports try to look for the REPORTS_PATH is
    1) REPORTS.sh
    2) rwserver.conf
    3) Settings as per Oracle Enterprise Manager Configuration Settings.
    My standalone report server name is ReportsServer_hostname_asinst_F and the In Process Server name is rep_wls_reports_hostname_asinst_frd. When I define rep_wls_reports_hostname_asinst_frd (In process Report Server Name) for the server name parameter, I do not get any results for the report run using srw.run_report. Also I can't see the reason behind the report executed because of the following issue
    http://hostname:8888/reports/rwservlet/showjobs?server=rep_wls_reports_hostname_asinst_frd
    REP-51019: System user authentication is missing.
    ** the Singlesignon in rwservlet.properties is defined as no
    But when I define ReportsServer_hostname_asinst_F (Standalone Report Server Name) as server parameter and ran the report using srw.run_report, I get result with the REPORTS_PATH defined in reports.sh not using rwserver.conf file.
    http://hostname:8888/reports/rwservlet/showjobs?server=ReportsServer_hostname_asinst_F
    (which shows the report just run).
    Can someone who did Report Server configuration using ENV files (changing rwserver.conf), pls. send me the screenshots. Want to make sure if I am changing the correct files under correct location.
    Pls. feel free to ask me questions related to the environment set up.
    Thanks

    Your question belongs in {forum:id=84}
    John

  • Profit cebter and copany code configuration issue

    i am making one sales order in which the item number level when i put profit center GB03100004 earlier i was getting company
    code in profit segment as GB03, but now i am getting as GB01.
    is this related to any configuration issue, please let me know.

    Hi,
    Goto the T.Code KE53.
    Enter the Controlling area.
    Enter the profit centre.
    Click on Company Codes.
    Check for which company code the field "Assigned" is ticked.
    Please check with your FICO consultant for more information and modifications.
    Regards,
    Krishna.

  • EM Configuration issue.

    I have installed grid agent on different server. When i ran emctl status agent i am getting below error.
    EM Configuration issue. /u01/app/oracle/product/10g/hostname.com_ORCL.
    OS is AIX
    Thanks in advance...

    I am in AGENT_HOME.You are under Agent installation that's one thing. You also need to make sure your environment variable ORACLE_HOME point to AGENT_HOME not the database installation.

  • OC4J Configuration issue

    Hi,
    I tried to put my database in Archivelog mode through EM , at the time of restarting the database it didnt start... instance is starting but database is not opening....
    I tried this command but its giving error... ( I am running 10g r2 , on RHEL 5 which is install on Oracle virtual toolbox )
    emctl start dbconsole
    OC4J Configuration issue. /opt/oracle/oraclehome_112/db_1/oc4j/j2ee/OC4J_DBConsole_myhostname_orcl not found.
    where orcl is the instance name.
    and this directory, OC4J_DBConsole_myhostname_orcl, does not exist on the file system.
    In some article I read ... the solution I tried to type...
    http://kamranagayev.com/2011/03/21/step-by-step-installing-oracle11g-on-linux/
    Feedback no. 19
    ./emca -deconfig dbcontrol db -repos drop
    bash : ./emca : No Such file or Directory
    ./emca -config dbcontrol db -repos create
    Thanks and regards...

    Hello;
    I'm thinking this step was either missed of you have a typo :
    Change the entry of .bash_profile file of the oracle user and add following lines:
    vi /home/oracle/.bash_profile
    export ORACLE_HOME=/u01/home/oracle/product/11.2.0/db_1
    export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:$ORACLE_HOME/lib
    export PATH=$ORACLE_HOME/bin:$PATHIf your ORACLE_HOME is set it should find the "emca".
    You can test by running these export commands at the Linux prompt.
    The which command is your friend
    which emca
    /u01/app/oracle/product/11.2.0.2/bin/emcaBest Regards
    mseberg
    Edited by: mseberg on Feb 29, 2012 2:52 PM

  • WSRM Configuration Issues-Need Urgent Help

    Dear Experts,
    we are configuring WSRM between TM 9.0 and ERP 606 systems. we have followed the document from the SAP note 1043195. we have completed the technical configuration. we are facing issues in application configurations.
    1.       When we have tried to create central business scenario configuration connection, the input help pop-up window is showing correct values in the fields (Consumer System is ERP , Provider System is TM) but when we click on create both consumer and provider systems become ERP  system)
    2.For the service group TM_ERP_ORDINT, both consumer and provider system showing ERP systems and provider interface is mismatching with guide provided interfaces.
    As per the guide, consumer proxy should be mapped to below respective service interfaces but system showing wrong service interfaces.(We saved the above selected entries)
    how to resolve the issues?
    Please help us..
    Thanks and regards,
    Pradeep

    Bdrom probably dead. Can buy a replacement one off eBay easy enough. Replacement normally only one or two screws.
    Personally I would go for seagate drive but western digital will be fine so long as you have the recovery media.
    Disassembly of laptops can be tricky if you are new to it. Too long to explain here but Google for a service manual for your unit or a YouTube video. With patience and a good screwdriver it's not too much trouble.
    Depending on what's wrong with the fan (man be just clogged with dust) you may need a replacement. Look for spares on ebay or spares supplier.
    Ram should be easy to find out, Google the part number or check the bios. You can check the manual for compatible ram or try Kingston/crucial ram checker database (not guaranteed but rarely wrong)

  • Lync 2013 to Exchange 2013 Oauth problem - Error:[OAuthTokenBuilder:GetAppToken] unable to continue building token; no locally configured issuer

    Hi,
    I am having a problem getting OAuth to work from Exchange 2013 to Lync 2013.
    I have read and following the instructions online and cannot see what I am doing wrong.
    On the Exchange 2013 server, I get the following error when I run:
    Test-OAuthConnectivity -Service EWS -TargetUri
    https://exchserver2.domainname.local/ews/ -Mailbox "Jack"
    RunspaceId : 920118a3-6ab2-45dc-9b68-de68133de95e
    Task : Checking EWS API Call Under Oauth
    Detail : The configuration was last successfully loaded at 01/01/0001 00:00:00 UTC. This was 1059263714 minutes
    ago.
    The token cache is being cleared because "use cached token" was set to false.
    Exchange Outbound Oauth Log:
    Client request ID: 19ad80f6-7751-429f-aac5-e802105fbbc6
    Information:[OAuthCredentials:Authenticate] entering
    Information:[OAuthCredentials:Authenticate] challenge from
    'https://exchserver2.domainname.local/ews/Exchange.asmx' received: Bearer
    client_id="00000002-0000-0ff1-ce00-000000000000",
    trusted_issuers="[email protected]",Negotiate,NTLM
    Information:[OAuthCredentials:GetToken] client-id: '00000002-0000-0ff1-ce00-000000000000', realm: '',
    trusted_issuer: '[email protected]'
    Information:[OAuthCredentials:GetToken] start building a token for the user domain 'domainname.co.uk'
    Information:[OAuthTokenBuilder:GetAppToken] start building the apptoken
    Information:[OAuthTokenBuilder:GetAppToken] checking enabled auth servers
    Error:[OAuthTokenBuilder:GetAppToken] unable to continue building token; no locally configured issuer
    was in the trusted_issuer list, realm from challenge was also empty. trust_issuers was
    [email protected]
    Error:The trusted issuers contained the following entries
    '[email protected]'. None of them are configured locally.
    Exchange Response Details:
    HTTP response message:
    Exception:
    System.Net.WebException: The request was aborted: The request was canceled. --->
    Microsoft.Exchange.Security.OAuth.OAuthTokenRequestFailedException: The trusted issuers contained the
    following entries '[email protected]'. None of them are
    configured locally.
    at Microsoft.Exchange.Security.OAuth.OAuthTokenBuilder.GetAppToken(String applicationId, String
    destinationHost, String realmFromChallenge, IssuerMetadata[] trustedIssuersFromChallenge, String
    userDomain)
    at Microsoft.Exchange.Security.OAuth.OAuthTokenBuilder.GetAppWithUserToken(String applicationId,
    String destinationHost, String realmFromChallenge, IssuerMetadata[] trustedIssuersFromChallenge, String
    userDomain, ClaimProvider claimProvider)
    at Microsoft.Exchange.Security.OAuth.OAuthCredentials.GetToken(WebRequest webRequest,
    HttpAuthenticationChallenge challengeObject)
    at Microsoft.Exchange.Security.OAuth.OAuthCredentials.Authenticate(String challengeString, WebRequest
    webRequest, Boolean preAuthenticate)
    at Microsoft.Exchange.Security.OAuth.OAuthCredentials.OAuthAuthenticationModule.Authenticate(String
    challenge, WebRequest request, ICredentials credentials)
    at System.Net.AuthenticationManager.Authenticate(String challenge, WebRequest request, ICredentials
    credentials)
    at System.Net.AuthenticationState.AttemptAuthenticate(HttpWebRequest httpWebRequest, ICredentials
    authInfo)
    at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.CheckResubmitForAuth()
    at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.CheckResubmit(Exception& e, Boolean& disableUpload)
    at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.DoSubmitRequestProcessing(Exception& exception)
    at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.ProcessResponse()
    at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.SetResponse(CoreResponseData coreResponseData)
    --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
    at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.GetResponse()
    at Microsoft.Exchange.Monitoring.TestOAuthConnectivityHelper.SendExchangeOAuthRequest(ADUser user,
    String orgDomain, Uri targetUri, String& diagnosticMessage, Boolean appOnly, Boolean useCachedToken,
    Boolean reloadConfig)
    ResultType : Error
    Identity : Microsoft.Exchange.Security.OAuth.ValidationResultNodeId
    IsValid : True
    ObjectState : New
    It appears to work fine from Lync 2013 to Exchange 2013.
    When I run: Test-CsExStorageConnectivity -sipuri [email protected] -Binding Nettcp -Verbose in Lync 2013 I get a successful outcome:
    VERBOSE: Successfully opened a connection to storage service at localhost using
    binding: NetNamedPipe.
    VERBOSE: Create message.
    VERBOSE: Execute Exchange Storage Command.
    VERBOSE: Processing web storage response for ExCreateItem Success.,
    result=Success, activityId=0bbdc565-4a05-4b57-bf95-0c75488a1ef6, reason=.
    VERBOSE: Activity tracing:
    2015/01/02 19:15:55.616 Autodiscover, send GetUserSettings request,
    [email protected], Autodiscover
    Uri=https://exchserver2.domainname.local/autodiscover/autodiscover.svc, Web
    Proxy=<NULL>
    2015/01/02 19:15:55.616 Autodiscover.EWSMA trace,
    type=AutodiscoverRequestHttpHeaders, message=<Trace
    Tag="AutodiscoverRequestHttpHeaders" Tid="30" Time="2015-01-02 19:15:55Z">
    POST /autodiscover/autodiscover.svc HTTP/1.1
    Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
    Accept: text/xml
    User-Agent: ExchangeServicesClient/15.00.0516.004
    </Trace>
    2015/01/02 19:15:55.624 Autodiscover.EWSMA trace, type=AutodiscoverRequest,
    message=<Trace Tag="AutodiscoverRequest" Tid="30" Time="2015-01-02 19:15:55Z"
    Version="15.00.0516.004">
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
    <soap:Envelope
    xmlns:a="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/2010/Autodiscover"
    xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
    <soap:Header>
    <a:RequestedServerVersion>Exchange2013</a:RequestedServerVersion>
    <wsa:Action>http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/2010/Autodiscover/Autodiscove
    r/GetUserSettings</wsa:Action>
    <wsa:To>https://exchserver2.domainname.local/autodiscover/autodiscover.svc</
    wsa:To>
    </soap:Header>
    <soap:Body>
    <a:GetUserSettingsRequestMessage
    xmlns:a="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/2010/Autodiscover">
    <a:Request>
    <a:Users>
    <a:User>
    <a:Mailbox>[email protected]</a:Mailbox>
    </a:User>
    </a:Users>
    <a:RequestedSettings>
    <a:Setting>InternalEwsUrl</a:Setting>
    <a:Setting>ExternalEwsUrl</a:Setting>
    <a:Setting>ExternalEwsVersion</a:Setting>
    </a:RequestedSettings>
    </a:Request>
    </a:GetUserSettingsRequestMessage>
    </soap:Body>
    </soap:Envelope>
    </Trace>
    2015/01/02 19:15:55.704 Autodiscover.EWSMA trace,
    type=AutodiscoverResponseHttpHeaders, message=<Trace
    Tag="AutodiscoverResponseHttpHeaders" Tid="30" Time="2015-01-02 19:15:55Z">
    HTTP/1.1 200 OK
    Transfer-Encoding: chunked
    request-id: 5917d246-64b0-48e2-ad79-f9b6cffb5bea
    X-CalculatedBETarget: exchserver2.domainname.local
    X-DiagInfo: EXCHSERVER2
    X-BEServer: EXCHSERVER2
    Cache-Control: private
    Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
    Set-Cookie: ClientId=FTFXWUQWWRJVBMNBG; expires=Sat, 02-Jan-2016 19:15:55 GMT;
    path=/;
    HttpOnly,X-BackEndCookie=actas1(sid:S-1-5-21-3691024758-535552880-811174816-113
    5|smtp:[email protected]|upn:[email protected])=u56Lnp2ejJqBx8jIn
    sqbxpvSz8rHx9LLzp7O0sbOzcnSzcqcmZqem8aempmcgYHNz87K0s/N0s/Oq87Gxc7KxcrK;
    expires=Sun, 01-Feb-2015 19:15:55 GMT; path=/autodiscover; secure; HttpOnly
    Server: Microsoft-IIS/8.5
    X-AspNet-Version: 4.0.30319
    X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
    X-FEServer: EXCHSERVER2
    Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 19:15:55 GMT
    </Trace>
    2015/01/02 19:15:55.704 Autodiscover.EWSMA trace, type=AutodiscoverResponse,
    message=<Trace Tag="AutodiscoverResponse" Tid="30" Time="2015-01-02 19:15:55Z"
    Version="15.00.0516.004">
    <s:Envelope xmlns:s="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
    xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing">
    <s:Header>
    <a:Action
    s:mustUnderstand="1">http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/2010/Autodiscover/Au
    todiscover/GetUserSettingsResponse</a:Action>
    <h:ServerVersionInfo
    xmlns:h="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/2010/Autodiscover"
    xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <h:MajorVersion>15</h:MajorVersion>
    <h:MinorVersion>0</h:MinorVersion>
    <h:MajorBuildNumber>1044</h:MajorBuildNumber>
    <h:MinorBuildNumber>21</h:MinorBuildNumber>
    <h:Version>Exchange2013_SP1</h:Version>
    </h:ServerVersionInfo>
    </s:Header>
    <s:Body>
    <GetUserSettingsResponseMessage
    xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/2010/Autodiscover">
    <Response xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <ErrorCode>NoError</ErrorCode>
    <ErrorMessage />
    <UserResponses>
    <UserResponse>
    <ErrorCode>NoError</ErrorCode>
    <ErrorMessage>No error.</ErrorMessage>
    <RedirectTarget i:nil="true" />
    <UserSettingErrors />
    <UserSettings>
    <UserSetting i:type="StringSetting">
    <Name>InternalEwsUrl</Name>
    <Value>https://exchserver2.domainname.local/EWS/Exchange.asmx</Value>
    </UserSetting>
    <UserSetting i:type="StringSetting">
    <Name>ExternalEwsUrl</Name>
    <Value>https://exchserver2.domainname.co.uk/EWS/Exchange.asmx</Value>
    </UserSetting>
    <UserSetting i:type="StringSetting">
    <Name>ExternalEwsVersion</Name>
    <Value>15.00.1044.000</Value>
    </UserSetting>
    </UserSettings>
    </UserResponse>
    </UserResponses>
    </Response>
    </GetUserSettingsResponseMessage>
    </s:Body>
    </s:Envelope>
    </Trace>
    2015/01/02 19:15:55.704 Autodiscover, received GetUserSettings response,
    duration Ms=88, response=NoError
    2015/01/02 19:15:55.706 Lookup user details,
    sipUri=sip:[email protected], [email protected],
    sid=S-1-5-21-3691024758-535552880-811174816-1135, [email protected],
    tenantId=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    VERBOSE: Items choice type: CreateItemResponseMessage.
    VERBOSE: Response message, class: Success, code: NoError.
    VERBOSE: Item: Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.Storage.Exchange.Ews.MessageType, Id:
    AAMkADAwNWZkZWI0LWM5NGYtNDUxNy05Nzk3LWZhZjRiY2Y4MTU4NwBGAAAAAADLP1MgTEXdQ7zQSlb
    qPl++BwBauhRZTfLbTYZ+hBWtK784ANcdmUYqAACSqIurRqgYSZwMhT/IBw89AACnT6G9AAA=,
    change key: CQAAABYAAACSqIurRqgYSZwMhT/IBw89AACnip6b, subject: , body: .
    VERBOSE: Is command successful: True.
    Test passed.
    All my certificates on the Exchange 2013 and Lync 2013 servers are from my local CA.
    I use APP with the public certificates as my reverse proxy for people connecting from outside the network.
    In Lync, the OAuthTokenIssuer certificate created through the Lync deployment wizard is issued to domainname.local (my primary sip domain) and the Subject Alternative names include domainname.co.uk
    I then exported this certificate to the Exchange Server and use the Set-AuthConfig to use this certificate for OAuth.
    from what I read this was what I was supposed to do.
    is this correct?
    I have tried so many things I don't know what do to next.
    Should the OAuth certificate in exchange be the one exported from Lync?
    In Lync, should the OAuthTokenIssuer certificate include the servername or lyncserver.domainname.local or just be domainname.local like it is at the moment?
    thank-you
    jack

    Thomas,
    thanks for giving this the time. I have run the Configure-EnterpriseApplication.ps1 script following by remove-PartnerApplication so many times that I was wondering if there are other setting that
    Configure-EnterpriseApplication.ps1 creates that aer not removed when you run
    remove-PartnerApplication.
    is there a way to completely remove everything that is confirmed when you run
    Configure-EnterpriseApplication.ps1 so I can run Configure-EnterpriseApplication.ps1 without there being any configurations left from when I previously run that command?
    thanks
    jack
    [PS] C:\Windows\system32>Get-PartnerApplication |fl
    RunspaceId : cb2fb328-769d-4b32-8b7b-1fa35e2994f5
    Enabled : True
    ApplicationIdentifier : 00000004-0000-0ff1-ce00-000000000000
    CertificateStrings : {MIIGcDCCBVigAwIBAgITPgAAARIHL+ig32UAAQAAAAABEjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBcMRUwEwYKCZIm
    iZPyLGQBGRYFbG9jYWwxHTAbBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFg1HdWlkZUNsb3RoaW5nMSQwIgYDVQQDExtHdWlkZ
    UNsb3RoaW5nLUFQUFNFUlZFUjEtQ0EwHhcNMTUwMTEwMTIxODIzWhcNMTcwMTA5MTIxODIzWjB7MQswCQ
    YDVQQGEwJHQjEPMA0GA1UECBMGTG9uZG9uMQ8wDQYDVQQHEwZMb25kb24xHzAdBgNVBAoTFkd1aWRlIEN
    sb3RoaW5nIExpbWl0ZWQxCzAJBgNVBAsTAkhRMRwwGgYDVQQDExNHdWlkZUNsb3RoaW5nLmNvLnVrMIIB
    IjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAyzDzaLsjJfktsbwIJ998ihsZM/0rKGdIt8rIx00oc
    HA7w0uVyz2UqnP9a8uRi6HkA7djbynlmGG0hKSUUQngXxz7q2dY6q9rcY5Rw2mJOMeppounx44FFp4+4e
    5HQKviLTYo+3DBGIR0mYDqxanKPS00d0f7HDLvmVb90hjdrbE372JBdcNNHs2OHRqg37bN2fAbwd22c9x
    2kvi0rESFnr+KcIGECVInCTHLJ7fwVqvi4hvRqtz7KLZsMXprpgeVDs45EMMRtwJ5Hw8uZR4CFz4dHSlo
    dIVgDPn8Ns2vGhcUK0JU4WkDbjnqo1SJzHlqtNjiu//wGcn77PAiM0yhyQIDAQABo4IDCjCCAwYwCwYDV
    R0PBAQDAgWgMCEGCSsGAQQBgjcUAgQUHhIAVwBlAGIAUwBlAHIAdgBlAHIwEwYDVR0lBAwwCgYIKwYBBQ
    UHAwEwHQYDVR0OBBYEFOY3whPicRAXNsTDSIg3FexpaCKdMHUGA1UdEQRuMGyCH0x5bmNTZXJ2ZXIyLkd
    1aWRlQ2xvdGhpbmcuY28udWuCH0x5bmNTZXJ2ZXIyLkd1aWRlQ2xvdGhpbmcubG9jYWyCE0d1aWRlQ2xv
    dGhpbmcuY28udWuCE0d1aWRlQ2xvdGhpbmcubG9jYWwwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUDHst3gUSMGwvkiNTPavmi
    UEWgtQwggEuBgNVHR8EggElMIIBITCCAR2gggEZoIIBFYaBzWxkYXA6Ly8vQ049R3VpZGVDbG90aGluZy
    1BUFBTRVJWRVIxLUNBLENOPURvbVNlcnZlcjIsQ049Q0RQLENOPVB1YmxpYyUyMEtleSUyMFNlcnZpY2V
    zLENOPVNlcnZpY2VzLENOPUNvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb24sREM9R3VpZGVDbG90aGluZyxEQz1sb2NhbD9jZXJ0
    aWZpY2F0ZVJldm9jYXRpb25MaXN0P2Jhc2U/b2JqZWN0Q2xhc3M9Y1JMRGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uUG9pbnSGQ
    2h0dHA6Ly9jcmwuZ3VpZGVjbG90aGluZy5sb2NhbC9jcmxkL0d1aWRlQ2xvdGhpbmctQVBQU0VSVkVSMS
    1DQS5jcmwwgdUGCCsGAQUFBwEBBIHIMIHFMIHCBggrBgEFBQcwAoaBtWxkYXA6Ly8vQ049R3VpZGVDbG9
    0aGluZy1BUFBTRVJWRVIxLUNBLENOPUFJQSxDTj1QdWJsaWMlMjBLZXklMjBTZXJ2aWNlcyxDTj1TZXJ2
    aWNlcyxDTj1Db25maWd1cmF0aW9uLERDPUd1aWRlQ2xvdGhpbmcsREM9bG9jYWw/Y0FDZXJ0aWZpY2F0Z
    T9iYXNlP29iamVjdENsYXNzPWNlcnRpZmljYXRpb25BdXRob3JpdHkwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBAD
    87GUPi02czEMO2Op0CeKBBpGwsfjYR9+RlC2uKAoH8PbWAxYNP3Ke6BtPeFy+95GGAJd5Z0+6LpO/AagA
    +zeY/tocZQjy0pYaU4/TPZgD+ZB/8sU982msu+8waO316ipBcf/87n9ZW3Jjk5DcVbtwrZErrGRe9DEn8
    QArN0jroLfaRtbDumse1Lp76+dxFuVhlLWcUXtIKaxm+UU9DS94EwJMtN54lDm3EG6hVdiGUR7TYqZU0K
    HGm7HciIhuO+2rhAazOBiIAAW6wZRUpFKZONSVD6bKrQCzL12LvynQ7XC6Itgr4JGzNCmoN43dXwVCkWo
    amTDdZY4h+QBqUvvY=}
    AuthMetadataUrl : https://lyncserver2.domainname.local/metadata/json/1
    Realm : domainname.local
    UseAuthServer : False
    AcceptSecurityIdentifierInformation : True
    LinkedAccount : domainname.local/Users/LyncEnterprise-ApplicationAccount
    IssuerIdentifier :
    AppOnlyPermissions :
    ActAsPermissions :
    AdminDisplayName :
    ExchangeVersion : 0.20 (15.0.0.0)
    Name : LyncEnterprise-786f61476b634278a3c9b9e4ec08b660
    DistinguishedName : CN=LyncEnterprise-786f61476b634278a3c9b9e4ec08b660,CN=Partner
    Applications,CN=Auth Configuration,CN=domainname,CN=Microsoft
    Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,DC=domainname,DC=local
    Identity : LyncEnterprise-786f61476b634278a3c9b9e4ec08b660
    Guid : 07495125-ccd4-4443-82d9-74fc3b955cdf
    ObjectCategory : domainname.local/Configuration/Schema/ms-Exch-Auth-Partner-Application
    ObjectClass : {top, msExchAuthPartnerApplication}
    WhenChanged : 10/01/2015 17:14:55
    WhenCreated : 10/01/2015 17:14:55
    WhenChangedUTC : 10/01/2015 17:14:55
    WhenCreatedUTC : 10/01/2015 17:14:55
    OrganizationId :
    Id : LyncEnterprise-786f61476b634278a3c9b9e4ec08b660
    OriginatingServer : DomServer2.domainname.local
    IsValid : True
    ObjectState : Unchanged

  • Essbase 11.1.2.1 Configuration Issue

    Hi ,
    I am using windows xp 32 bit processor and installed Essbase 11.1.2.1 successfully.
    Configured with one Oracle 11g data base user/Schema working fine and also tried to configure with Two Users/Schemas
    in another system workig fine.I heard that if we configure only with one schema Essbase components and Shared
    services will conflict.so I would like to know with how many users we have to configure only Hyperion Essbase to get
    Better Performance.
    Regards
    Sekhar.

    Hi John,
    Then shall i proceed with one user/schema ?
    If i proceed with two users/schema is there any problem will come or not ?
    Is there any order to configure with one schema ?
    like all Foundation components first after Essbase components.
    Number of schema/users consideration is not an issue to me but i need best configured
    Essbase Server without facing configuration issues in Future.
    I had doubt on it may expect clarification ?
    Regards
    Sekhar

  • OC4J Configuration issue Oracle 11g R2 Windows XP and Windows 7

    Hallo!I have installed Oracle Database 11.2.0.1.0 on both Windows XP and Windows 7 on 2 different machines.
    Before installing on both OSs,I had installed Microsoft Loopback Adapter and had set hostname as JOEY-PC and IP address 192.168.0.X.Once the installations were complete and I restarted the machines,I could not start OEM and the error below appears
    C:\Documents and Settings\JOEY>emctl start dbconsole
    OC4J Configuration issue. C:\app\JOEY\product\11.2.0\dbhome_1/oc4j/j2ee/OC4J_DBConsole_JOEY-PC_orcl not found.
    When I went to the C:\app\JOEY\product\11.2.0\dbhome_1\oc4j\j2ee directory,I found the folder OC4J_DBConsole_localhost_orcl instead of OC4J_DBConsole_JOEY-PC_orcl.
    I assumed that by using Microsoft Loopback Adapter,I would avoid the error above and that the OC4J_DBConsole folder would permanently remain as OC4J_DBConsole_JOEY-PC_orcl instead of OC4J_DBConsole_localhost_orcl.
    Why is this folder changing its name and how can I resolve this issue?
    Thanks.

    Pl post the contents of the file C:\WINDOWS\System32\drivers\etc\hosts on both servers
    What steps did you take to set the hostname to JOEY-PC ?
    Srini

Maybe you are looking for