Perfomance/memory usage issues running LR 3.3 on 32 bit Win XP

I'm using LR 3.x for some time now, at the moment my version is LR 3.3. My machine is set up with a 3.6 GHz core 2 duo cpu, 4 GB of RAM and four samsung spinpoint hdd. LR 3.3 runs on Windows XP SP3 32 bit OS, usable memory is 3,25 GB. At HDD 2 LR is installed, at HDD 3 library is located, at HDD 4 LR cache (20 GB) is located. I use one "big" library with around 20.000 raw images. I use 1:1 preview and deactivated deleting preview.
I noticed that LR is working slow after some time of working on raw images. Tools are lagging, rendering takes very long and sometimes I get the error message that not enough virtual memory is available anymore. Also in task manager I noticed a continuos increase of memory usage, starting around 800 MB, ending up - I can't work anymore - around 3,00 GB. Memory usage never lowers.
Do you have any information how to solve this perfomance/memory issues? Thanks and best regards from Germany.

There is a large thread for this.
Here is the link: http://forums.adobe.com/thread/760245?tstart=0
WW

Similar Messages

What's the recommended setting for "Process memory usage" ("process virtual" in UI) for a 64-bit host on a 64-bit OS?

Hi gurus
In resource based throttling, what's the recommended setting for "Process memory usage" ("process virtual" in the resource based throttling tab of the UI) for a 64-bit host
on a 64-bit Windows OS?
According to MS (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee308808(v=bts.10).aspx):
"By default, the
Process memory usage throttling threshold is set to 25. If this value is exceeded and the BizTalk process memory usage is more than 300 MB, a throttling condition may occur. On a 32-bit
server, you can increase the Process memory usage value to 50. On a 64-bit server, you can increase this value to 100. This allows for more memory consumption by the BizTalk process before throttling
occurs."
Does this mean that 100 is the recommended setting for a 64-bit host on a 64-bit Windows?
Thanks
Michael Brandt Lassen

Hi Michael,
Recommended setting is the default setting which is 25 .dot.
If your situation is abnormal and you see message delivery throttling state to “4” when the following performance counters are high or if you expect any of you integration
process could have impact on following counters, then you can consider the suggestion by Microsoft. Don’t change the default setting.
High process memory
Process memory usage (MB)
Process memory usage threshold (MB)
You can see these counters under “BizTalk:MessageAgent”
You can gauge these performance counter and its maximum values if have done any regression/performance testing in your test servers. If you have seen these counters having
high values and causing throttling, then you can update the Process memory usage.
Or unexpectedly you’re process high throughput messages in production which is causing these counters to go high and cause throttling, then up can update the Process memory
usage.
The above two cases where I know my expected process usage (by doing performance testing) or suddenly my production server processing has gone high due to unexpected business
hike (or any reasons) which caused throttling, then do changes to default throttling setting.
Just changing the default setting without actual reason could have adverse effect where you end up allocating
more processing capacities but the actual message processing message usage ever is low means you end up investing in underutilised resources.
Regards,
M.R.Ashwin Prabhu
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Run PE8 (and PSE8) with 64-bit Win 7

My hardware
Dell XPS 600 desktop
3.2 Mhz Intel Pentium D
64-bit Win 7 OS (full clean custom install)
dual-STI NVIDIA GForce 6800 video cards (w/64-bit drivers)
6 GB RAM
What's the latest word on successfully running PE8 (and PSE8) with 64-bit Win 7 (particularly with my current very stable computer setup above)?

I haven't had any serious issues as such with my Win7 64 bit PC.
~V

Memory Usage Issue - T400

Hello,
I got my T400 in this morning and facing a small issue with the memory usage. I ordered the laptop with Windows Vista Biz. 64bit
The memory usage at the start up is above 1.3GB. Is that normal?
I am using a desktop PC where the memory usage did not hit 900MB (I am using Windows Vista Ult. 64bit).
T400 spec.
42X6336 SBB INT.CORE2DUOPROCP8600
42V8173 VBB MS WIN VISTA BUSSINESS 64
44C1081 SBB G W VISTABSS64 US ENGLISH
43Y3484 SBB MW XP PROFES. US ENG RDVD
42X6321 SBB 14.1 WXGA+ TFT, W/ CAMERA
42X6315 SBB AMD M82XT HYBRID 256MB
42X6306 VBB 2GBPC3-8500 1067MHZ1DIMM
42X6355 SBB KYB US ENGLISH
42X6323 SBB ULTRNAV(TRP+TOUCHP)FINGERP
42X6351 SBB 160GB HDD/7200RPM
42X6326 SBB INT.TURBOMEMORY1.6 2GB
42X6345 SBB DVDRECORD.8XMAXDUAL,ULTBAY
42X6312 SBB EXPR.CARDSLOTXN4-1M.CARDR.
42X6325 SBB INT.WIFI LINK5300
42X6328 SBB INTG.WIR.WIDENET UPGRAD.
42V9338 SBB 6 CELL LI-ION BATERRY
39T6442 SBB COUNTRY PACK NORTH AMERICA
42X6388 SBB LPACK US ENGLISH

Hi, everyone
I got a new t440p 20ANA00UHH (8GB RAM, win8 64bits) about one week ago. It works really well, but its memory usage confused me. In Task Manager, the "Performance" option shows memory is 68% (5.4G in use), but "Users" option shows memory usage 66% (1019.5M in use). Is that normal ? I just opened some websites and word files.

Memory usage issue

I have a Macbook Air (mid 2013, 4gb memory, 128gb storage) and I'm running OSX 10.8.5 mountain lion.
My issue is that the free memory is always low, even when starting up the computer:
When I start up the computer, with nothing yet opened (note: I only have the iTunes Helper in the Login Items) the memory settles on 1.35 gb.
When I open Safari alone, memory immediately goes down to around 1.1gb. Granted, the more tabs I open in safari, the more it decreases.
After a little while, I close Safari, and the memory settles on max 2.2gb.
And often, after idleness, with no apps open, memory just decreases to about 940mb or less. Once it does, opening an app continues to drag it down, many times to double digits. I use the app "Memory Clean" on my menu bar to immediately clear up some of it.
I'm typically operating, from startup everytime, on about 1.3gb of memory, except for when it drops excessively. Why is it so relatively low when I have 4GB total? There should be about 3GB available when no apps are opened, at least on startup. Why is the computer using up so much memory when I have no real startup apps (aside iTunes Helper, and Avast, the latter not showing up in Login Items) and no third party apps?
I've checked the Activity Monitor, and on the list of processes, Safari web content (when Safari's used) is often the one in the list taking up the most memory, normally around 250mb, but sometimes high up to 720mb. "Kernel_task" usually comes in second with around 3.5% CPU, 300 mb. "mds" in third with about 85 mb. (Avast 4th with 70mb). What are the Kernel and mds processes about? can/should they be ended to free up CPU or are they system processes?
One last point: is there any use or harm in the Empty Caches fucntion of Safari? Is this the equivalent of empty internet files/history/cookies in Internet Explorer? I've clicked it and then quit Safari and it seemed to not increse memory at all.
Any input and or solution is appreciated.

you cannot add more RAM to an Air
Mavericks is designed to use RAM differently for good reason. Normal
http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/06/12/compressed-memory-in-os-x-109-maverick s-aims-to-free-ram-extend-battery-life
Mavericks uses RAM much more efficiently than any other previous version of OS X. Mavericks now has a memory compression feature that will compress the memory occupied by applications that aren't being actively used and give the freed up RAM to the application that needs it the most.
Memory Pressure graph that tells you how stressed is the system in terms of memory.
Fore more information about OS X Mavericks new system management technologies visit:
http://www.apple.com/osx/advanced-technologies/
See page 5 here:
http://images.apple.com/media/us/osx/2013/docs/OSX_Mavericks_Core_Technology_Ove rview.pdf

After upgrading ipod touch4 to ISO 5, why is the 'other' memory usage running at 25gb?

just upgraded my ipod touch4 to iso 5 and discovered that the "other" memory usage is running at 25gb and basically uses all of my 32gb capacity. Something mucst be wrong???

it is icloud's backup and photostream feature. Turn them off and reboot the device and the space will come back.

Logic Pro 8, Kontakt 2.23 & Memory usage

Hello -
*What type of known memory problems might exist between Logic (Logic 8 in particular) and either Kontakt 2.23 or Kontakt Player 2.23??*
*If there are known memory usage issues, what can be done to help/fix the situation??*
My computer set up is listed below. I have not upgraded to Leopard (but did upgrade to Logic Pro 8). By-in-large, Logic Pro 8 works fine. However, I usually "network" the Logic sequencing projects with Muse Research's Receptor (version B) and/or an aging Dell Precision Workstation 650 using Musiclab's MIDIoverLan CP3. This has proven stable for me. For my most recent project, I decided to see how many instrument plug-ins I can utilize within the Logic Pro 8 program (without benefit of this "network" set-up). For this project, I'm using one instance of MusicLab's RealGuitar and 16 instances of +*Kontakt Player version 2.23*+ for a total of 17 instrumental tracks. The instrument libraries used are Garritan's GPO and JABB. With this many individual (not multi) track instances used, the activity monitor is showing high RAM usage. For some of the instruments, I could not use the KS choices (trumpet, trombone) because the extra RAM caused Logic to crash as I mounted more instruments.
I tried adjusting the DFD. Still, there remained high RAM usage and the occasional crash. For some of the crashes, I either got the endless colored spinning wheel or a message basically stating that there was no memory available for the DFD. I am no expert with the advanced workings of Logic and the DFD associated with the Kontakt plug-ins. But I am surprised that using just 17 instrument tracks with this newer Mac Pro computer (with 5 GBs RAM) is causing problems. Sadly, I am not an expert Apple user to be able to tell whether it's the computer or Logic or Kontakt. I suspect, though, its some kind of issue between Kontakt and Logic.
For my audio, I use MOTU's 2408 MK3. For my midi in-put I use M-Audio's Keystation Pro 88. I do not think either one of these devices are causing the apparent memory problems.
By the way. . . before I purchased my newer MacPro computer, I had a similar instrumental set-up using my aging Dell Precision 650 workstation with 2 GB of RAM using Steinberg's SX 3 program. I used the same GPO and JABB sound libraries. It did "challange" the Dell computer (I had to adjust buffer/latency settings to MOTU's 828 MK2 used with the Dell computer), but the computer didn't crash like what I'm experiencing at present.
I don't mind "networking" my computers together in order to use larger instrumental plug-in tracks. But I would think that given the "power" of my newer MacPro I should be able to handle more than 17 GPO & JABB tracks. Yes? No?
*Given my current computer set-up, how many instrumental tracks (using libraries associated with Kontakt or the Kontakt Player) should I get??*
Thank you in advance.
Ted

Sadly, I can chime in with the same basic problem. Namely, that
Kontakt2 seems to leak ram. I've watched the activity monitor show
an increase in ram allocation to logic if i simply LOOK at a kontakt
instance. Just clicking on the instance causes ram to be allocated, and no matter how much I purge samples, I just can't retrieve that ram. Once 2 gigs are sent to logic, crash.
The only solution I've found is to save & restart before it climbs too high. I can then work for an hour or so until the ram overflows again. This is obviously a major bug, and I agree that Logic doesn't appear to be the culprit.
Have either of you tried K3? I wonder if the problem is more under control there? There's no way Kontakt will bother to fix this bug
in v2.23 with v3 on the shelves. The question is, how do we know that v3 fixes it without buying it? I've heard reports that v3 is even
more bloated than v2.
I've recently done a clean install of leopard on a blank drive, and
i'm patiently waiting until NI updates the installers for K2.
Then, i'll have a clean OS, clean newly installed logic 8, and
a cleanly installed K2. Maybe that will help mitigate, if not solve the problem.
I'm almost sure that Kontakt is the source of the problem, but
I've also been told that Intels have serious flaws in their ram
allocation WITH TIGER.
Some people with G5's have reported having access to 3.5 gigs ram.
Intells can only use 2 gigs with any one app. This was thought to be a problem with Tiger and and Intels. So maybe Leopard will expand the RAM wallet, and then we just have to wait for Kontakt to stop spending so much.

Occasional video freeze, related to memory usage?

Hi all,
I've been experiencing problems playing divx and flv (firefox) videos.
The image freezes for a second, then keeps playing, then freezes... again and again.
I have the same problem with VLC, MPlayer OS X, I have tried uninstalling Perian, or Flip4mac...
Computer updates are ok.
It looks like a memory usage issue to me but I am not sure.
Any idea?

Welcome to Apple Discussions!
One thing you could try is to go to System Preferences>QuickTime>Streaming and set the bar for a longer delay. I get this a lot with dial up, and I think it's because the download speed is slow. It downloads a little, plays a little, downloads a bit more, plays a bit more...and so on. With really fast internet, I think it downloads faster than it plays, so you don't get this.
Good luck!

Am running Firefox 7.0.1 now. Normal memory usage is 157mb but when running Facebook (not running apps nor games), it goes up to 553mb Why?

Am running Firefox 7.0.1 now. Normal memory usage is 157mb but when running Facebook (not running apps nor games), it goes up to 553mb Why?

I encountered the same type of problem. Firefox running terribly slowly and slowing down my entire machine (Core i5 with 256GB SSD). Searching the forums, I found a couple of things about troubleshooting performance issues, one of which was to use '''hardware acceleration''', that is on by default. It was turned on on my PC, '''so I tried deactivating it, and it worked!'''
So doing the exact opposite as Mozilla support said solved the problem. It is really a pain now to work with Firefox. I'm using it because I have no choice, but I'd recommend IE and Chrome over Firefox... Whatever, the market will decide once Firefox has become to crappy...

Exchange 2013 issue with High memory Usage on Mailbox server post SP1 update.

So we have been chugging along fine since Feb 2 2014.
I performed a migration from 2010 from the UK to the US doing "incremental" mailbox moves. (get in contact with me if you want to know how. But we moved 400 Mailboxes averaging at 2gb a piece from the UK to the US, over the transcontinental link.
& then the weekend of the final, had everyone & everything done by the end of the cutover weekend)
Any woot.
So I applied the 2013 SP1 a few weeks back, & have intermitantly been alerted to the memory spiking over 95%. For me (and for any exchange admin) when i get those types of alerts i drop everything & run to the nearest PC to see what is going on.
Now the first & second time, it was an issue with logs filling up the drives, & my clean log script not running to remove any logs older than 30 days. But since then it has been legitimate 95%+ memory usage.
For the most part its been 95-97 max, with 1 or 2 times hitting 98. After some time, the memory does drop back down to 94.
this is ....umm "fine" however it is becoming a nuisance, since most of the time it corrects itself. What i dont want to happen is get into the groove of saying "ah bah! its nothing" & letting it go.
the server has 16gb of memory in it, it is the Mailbox server (CAS /Frontend is on a seperate server)
below is a screen shot, so i know the Storeworker grabs whatever it feels like grabbing, however it does NOT EVER release memory. I also see the NodeRunner.exe (2 of them) is always around 900 almost a MB
now if i could somehow get the first 2 Storeworkers to drop down to 900ish, then that should alleviate my memory issues.
what I am m looking for is some type of "magic bullet" to put my memory issues at ease..

thats the problem & seems to be a misconception.
Exchange NEVER releases the memory when other things need it. As the users state in your thread you linked. (i came across that early in my search for a resolution). An example is if another admin & myself log into the backend server at the same
time & begin clicking around opening things, etc..Memory will go to 100% which = No Buenos.
There are numerous post all over the internet from people who say it releases, but them 5 more comments to that 1 saying that it does not.
I know what the process's do, however it seems like the SP1 has increased memory usage, as typically the Store.exe would only grab about 900-1000.
in terms of the noderunner, once again i know its role, however we are now 2 months+ live on 2013 post migration, I do not think it is still indexing all those emails.
all DB's report healthy.
Name Status CopyQueue ReplayQueue LastInspectedLogTime ContentIndex
Length Length State
WBAC1\EXCHBE001 Mounted 0 0
Healthy
WBAC2\EXCHBE001 Mounted 0 0
Healthy
WBAC3\EXCHBE001 Mounted 0 0
Healthy
WBAC4\EXCHBE001 Mounted 0 0
Healthy
WBAC5\EXCHBE001 Mounted 0 0
Healthy

Sql memory usage increase each time win app runs

Hi,
Sql memory usage increases each time when win app runs. Why does it work like this? Is it normal ?
I restart SQL Server 2012. Only my win app uses SQL server.
First run of winapp.
start memory usage : 211.800 KB
close memory usage: 528.136 KB
Second run of xaf app.
start memory usage : 528.136 KB
close memory usage: 996.844 KB
Third run of xaf app
start memory usage : 996.844 KB
close memory usage: 997.640 KB
Fourth run of xaf app
start memory usage : 997.640 KB
close memory usage: 1.104.864 KB

Hi,
Sql memory usage increases each time when win app runs. Why does it work like this? Is it normal ?
Yes, it is perfectly normal for SQL Server to acquire and hold onto large amounts of memory indefinitely. This memory improves performance by avoiding disk I/O, query plan compilation and costly memory management.
On a dedicated SQL Server you should usually let SQL Server dynamically manage memory. It will release memory if it detects memory pressure. But if you often run other applications on the server than need significant amounts of memory (e.g. IIS,
application services), you may want to set max server memory as suggested.
Dan Guzman, SQL Server MVP, http://www.dbdelta.com

0.5 MB program has 832 MB memory usage even before it is run

I just uninstalled and re-installed LabVIEW 2011. I was hoping this would do something to lower the memory footprint. Alas, it did not make any difference. This is what I see:
- When I launch LabVIEW, it uses 94 MB even before I have opened a single VI, i.e. only the front end uses this much memory.
- When I open the VI (the size of the .vi file is 549 KB), memory usage goes up to 836.4 MB. This is before I have even run the program.
- Finally, when I run the program, memory usage jumps to 1.17 GB.
I find this memory usage grotesquely high. Can anyone please shed some light on what can be done? I have uploaded the VI. It's a rather simple VI.
Thanks,
Neil
Attachments:
IP QL to charge - from img.vi ‏446 KB

nbf wrote:
1) If I understand correctly, what you are saying is that when I open the VI, the data structures associated with the intensity charts and waveform graphs are initialized to default values (e.g. 0), so there is memory usage even before the program is run and anything displayed, right?
Yes, a huge array still takes a lot of memory, even though it compresses well for storage inside the VI. Once the VI is ready to run, these arrays need to be allocated in memory.
nbf wrote:
2) Is there an alternative to using the value property node that doesn't duplicate the memory content? (e.g. something like pointer or reference in C++?)
One possiblity are data value references. You can open a DVR and fill it inside the subVI, then extract slices later as needed. If done properly, you can also keep the 2D data in a shift register (yes, please learn about them!).
nbf wrote:
4) Regarding the clearing of the indicators, could you please tell me how to do that, without removing the color ramp settings?
The color ramps can be set programmatically using property nodes based on array min&max and you can assign colors for the ramp values at will.
nbf wrote:
5) You are correct that I am displaying 4000x2000 array data in an intensity graph with 400x200 pixels. But then I change the min/max of the charts/graphs to zoom into the region of interest; I can identify the region of interest only after displaying the full 4000x2000 array of data. I don't know if there is a way around this.
Do you really need to show the 2D data in three different transforms? Maybe one intensity graph is sufficient. You can apply the other transforms on the extracted slices with <<1% of the computing effort. What is the range and resolution of your data? Do you really need DBL or is a smaller representation sufficient (SGL, I16, etc). From looking at the subVI, the raw data is U16. The subVI also involves a coercion to DBL, requireing another data copy in memory. When running, make absolutely sure that the subVI front panel is closed, else additional memory is used for the huge array indicator there. For better performance, you might want to flatten the subVI to the main diagram or at least inline it.
nbf wrote:
6) Yes, I use the continuous run mode instead of a toplevel while loop. Is there a disadvantage to doing that?
As Samuel Goldwyn ("A hospital is no place to be sick") might have said: "Run continuously is no way to run a VI"
Run continuously is a debugging tool and has no place in typical use. What it basically does is restart the VI automatically whenever it completes, and as fast as the CPU allows. It is mostly useful to quickly test subVIs that don't have a toplevel loop and play with inputs to verify results. Any toplevel VI needs a while loop surrounding the core code. Period!
So, my suggested plan of action would be:
Use a while loop around your toplevel code
Decide on the minimal representation needed to faithfully show the data.
Keep a single copy of the 2D array in a DVR
You optionally might want to undersample the data for display according to the pixel resolution and use other means of zooming and panning. For zooming, you could extract a differently sampled small array subset and adjust x0 and dx of the axes accordingly.
Use a single 2D graph (if you need to see the various transforms, add a ring selector and transform the 2D array in place. Never show more than one intensity graph.
See how far you get.
LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

When i run exe built in Labview 7.1 the memory usage goes on increasing

Dear Sir/Madam
I have built an application in LabView 7.1. When i run this application and view the memory usage in Task manager, i find that the memory usage goes on increasing.
Please help.
With Regards
Ravindra Kumbhar

Hi, Ravindra,
It looks that you have memory leak in your application.
There are lot of possible reasons for memory leaks - opened in cycle and not closed references, continuosly growing arrays, memory allocation in own DLLs, etc.
Normally you should have the same behaviour in development environment as well (memory of LabVIEW.exe incresed continuously).
You should check the code, which executed repeatable (while/for loops) for allocated, but not closed resources. What you can do is following - remove (or isolate) parts of you code, executed in cycles, then check is leak present or not. So, step by step you will found the place where leak occurred.
best regards,
Andrey.

Frequent crashes - using 900,00k + memory, many tabs open - is memory usage an issue?

I am having frequent crashing of firefox, several times a day.
I do have many tabs open, 100+, and memory usage is around 900,000 and up.
I am wondering if the memory usage is causing the crashing, or something else I can fix?
My task manager says I am using 67% of available memory.
Total: 2941
Cached:1202
Free: 74
Total: 207
Paged: 153
NonPaged: 53
Page File 2981M / 6116M
Here are the id's of the last 10 crash reports:
bp-c79bc97e-d502-4319-a49e-7bc0b2130917 9/16/201311:38 PM
bp-19f60b05-f268-4693-b622-066f42130917 9/16/20139:59 PM
bp-f43d9597-9023-487a-90d4-994d32130916 9/16/20137:15 PM
bp-b552cdc4-6920-4eed-bff7-cb7cf2130916 9/16/20136:04 PM
bp-b62272cb-f4ef-4f30-acc9-4a1752130916 9/16/20135:02PM
bp-f4bebdd3-20f9-4444-8245-520c42130916 9/16/20133:08 PM
bp-bad99992-5b2b-4ac1-96bc-e03812130915 9/14/201311:31 PM
962c451e-dc19-4707-9def-b2dd5cd4caed 9/14/201310:07 PM
bp-8de4bc69-0f86-417a-9727-e88622130914 9/14/20132:29 AM
bp-6ae9815f-1472-492d-8738-1cd842130914 9/14/20131:01 AM

These crash reports can be hard to interpret, but at least the six from 9/16 seem to be "out of memory" (OOM) errors. Assuming that is the case, the question is what might be done about that.
This support article has a range of suggestions, including not having more than 100 tabs open and possibly useful add-ons. [[Firefox uses too much memory (RAM) - How to fix]]. In a bug report, I also saw an extension that displays the usage on the add-on bar, which might help in keeping an eye on it.
I noticed you have several dom.ipc.plugins.* preferences set to False, which may force some plugins to run in firefox.exe rather than plugin-container.exe. The design of the process isolation feature is that plugin crashes will take down plugin-container.exe rather than firefox.exe. It may also be that overriding process isolation is ballooning the memory usage by firefox.exe rather than more evenly distributing it between the two processes. You may want to restore those settings to their defaults and see whether that helps.
Finally, to reduce the size of your sessionrestore.js file you could omit personal data (e.g., cookies, form data), but this will make it a bit harder after a crash to get back to where you were.

Problem with Firefox and very heavy memory usage

For several releases now, Firefox has been particularly heavy on memory usage. With its most recent version, with a single browser instance and only one tab, Firefox consumes more memory that any other application running on my Windows PC. The memory footprint grows significantly as I open additional tabs, getting to almost 1GB when there are 7 or 8 tabs open. This is as true with no extensions or pluggins, and with the usual set, (firebug, fire cookie, fireshot, XMarks). Right now, with 2 tabs, the memory is at 217,128K and climbing, CPU is between 0.2 and 1.5%.
I have read dozens of threads providing "helpful" suggestions, and tried any that seem reasonable. But like most others who experience Firebug's memory problems, none address the issue.
Firefox is an excellent tool for web developers, and I rely on it heavily, but have now resorted to using Chrome as the default and only open Firefox when I must, in order to test or debug a page.
Is there no hope of resolving this problem? So far, from responses to other similar threads, the response has been to deny any responsibility and blame extensions and/or pluggins. This is not helpful and not accurate. Will Firefox accept ownership for this problem and try to address it properly, or must we continue to suffer for your failings?

55%, it's still 1.6Gb....there shouldn't be a problem scanning something that it says will take up 300Mb, then actually only takes up 70Mb.
And not wrong, it obviously isn't releasing the memory when other applications need it because it doesn't, I have to close PS before it will release it. Yes, it probably is supposed to release it, but it isn't.
Thank you for your answer (even if it did appear to me to be a bit rude/shouty, perhaps something more polite than "Wrong!" next time) but I'm sitting at my computer, and I can see what is using how much memory and when, you can't.

Perfomance/memory usage issues running LR 3.3 on 32 bit Win XP

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for