Performance Appraisal - Default 2nd level manager as Part Appraiser

Hello
Unfortnately, we are not having much success with this. The requirement is to <b>default 2nd level manager</b> as Part Appraiser and <b>not show</b> the Manager and EE as part appraiser.
For this we created a implementation for the BADI <b>HRHAP00_DOC_DEF_DP</b> and incorporated the same in our appraisal template. But the system is now bringing only the EE as the part appraisal.
Has someone worked on something similar and is so what is the best way to approach this?
Thanks,

Hi Harun
Thank you for your feedback. By any chance would it be possible for you to post the code that we could use as a template on our end. The reason being, the ABAP person working on this project is very new and any guidance in terms of the tables to be included etc. would be greatly appreciated.
Many thanks in advance.

Similar Messages

  • Performance Appraisal-Move the document from Part Appraiser to Appraiser

    Hello
    After the 2nd level manager (part appraiser) has rejected the document, it should be sent back to the 1st level manager review the notes and make changes before resending it back to the 2nd level manager.
    When the second level manager receives the document, it is in "IN PROCESS-PART APPRAISAL IN PROCESS" status. Is it possible to change the status of the document from this status to "IN REVIEW" or some other status for the first level manager to make changes based on the 2nd level manager's feedback.
    How else can we incorporate the functionality? Please advice.
    Many thanks in advance.

    Hello
    We were able to achieve this by adding multiple substatus to the status "In Process" and then control the authorization at that level.
    Thanks

  • The next level manager is unable to view or access appraisal forms for all

    I am facing an issue where in the next level manager is not able to see the appraisal docs of employees.
    Follwing is the link that we found on SDN related to the same issue-
    Next higher level manager should see the appraisal docs of the employees
    During the PM testing, an issue was discovered with the existing logic of the ‘Default Next Level Manager’ BADI.
    When a manager manually reports to a NL manager’s organization unit, the next level manager is unable to view or access appraisal forms for all the employees who report to the manager.
    For example,
    NL Manager/Cheif: Susan
    Manager/Chief: John
    Employees: Mary and Matt
    If John’s position (manager/chief) has a “A 999 Reports to dotted line” relationship to Susan’s organization unit (NL Manager), then Susan is unable to access, approve or reject the appraisal forms for Mary and Matt (John’s direct reports).
    The relationship type is A 999 – Reports to dotted line
    Type of related object – O (Organizational Unit)
    We need to update the BADI in order for the next level manager to be able to access appraisal forms as described in the example above.
    BADI implementation Name : Z_HRHAP00_DOC_DEF_DO
    Method - IF_EX_HRHAP00_DOC_DEF_DO~DEFAULT_OTHERS
    Now we are facing the following issue-
    After identification of the employees who report to the manager’s organizational unit using the  A 003 – ‘Belongs to” relationship we are not sure how to pass these employees information from BADI to appraisal form, so that the previously identified Next Level Manager will be able to access, accept and reject appraisal forms for these employees.
    For further details please refer the thread. I was not able to understand how this can be achieved.
    Can anyone please mention in brief how I should be able to do this. I am new to this and I would appreciate any help .
    Regards,
    Satish.

    There are no Function Modules to my knowledge. Pls try the transaction S_AHR_61016530 which would display the User's approvers as per hierarchy. This would bring datas from the HR tables. If this helps pls award points.

  • Performance Appraisal - Workflow customization

    Hello
    Is it possible to customize the text on the workflow email that is sent to the appraiser or appraisee during various stages of the process. Specifically, the client would like to have the functionality wherein the 2nd level manager is able to enter the reason for rejecting an appraisal so that the manager can review the appraisal form only for the areas where there is disagreement.
    Please advice.
    Many thanks in advance

    Hi,
    Start with Tcode PFTC or SWDD.
    Give the Workflow no and select appropriate task type.
    Now inside the Workflow, you will find many tasks. There will be a decision making task. On double clicking it, u will get the task properties.
    Goto the description tab and select the task description. In that select the task description and change it as per your requirement.
    Hope this helps you.
    Regards,
    Subbu.

  • How to make Default the Higher-Level Manager of the employee

    Dear experts,
    how to make Default the Higher-Level Manager of the employee as Further Participant in performance management ?
    Regards,
    TVS

    Hi,
    The delivered BAdI below defaults in both the appraiser and appraisee as part-appraisers//Default Further Participants.
    BAdI Area: Appraisal Enhancements
    BAdI Definition: HRHAP00_DOC_DEF_DO (Appraisal - Default Further Participants)
    App. Enhn.: DEFAULT_ALL_MANAGERS     
    Implementation: HRTMC_DEF_OTHERS
    Implementation short text: Determine All Managers
    Implement this BADI  in SE18/SE19 and  write the desired code in the  BADI methods
    Hope this will help u out.....
    Regards
    Lakhan

  • Performance Appraisal: Automatic updation in case of Manager's Transfer

    Dear All,
    In performance appraisal Manager(n) is Appraiser and Manager's Manager(n1)  is included as further participant so that he can view appraisals of all employees who indirectly report to him. Now whenever this higher Manager (n1) is transferred new manager coming in can not view appraisals of his new department automatically. To enable this we update this further participant list manually of all old appraisal forms of his employees. Is there a way to do this automatically as such cases are quite a few and doing this manually is very time consuming.
    Thank You.

    i havent seen any automatic update
    in general if an employee changes the manager, the old manager
    should be replaced in the document as well by the new manager to get
    access to the entire document.
    I would suggets to replace the appraiser in the documnet e.g. by
    transaction PHAP_ADMIN so that the new manager sees the entire
    document.
    scenarios could be
    solved using BAdI HRHAP00_ACC_HEADER. It'll enable you to change the
    appraiser of the created appraisal documents when manager has been
    changed.

  • Custem Work Flow Notification Mailer -HRWPM-Performance Appraisal

    Hi Guys,
    I have defined a custom mailer for performance email redirection. but only approval emails are not redirecting regarding Performance appraisals, Should I define Custom mailer for Approval emails to be re-directed on another email address despite of by default.
    the workflow item which i am using HRWPM for Performance emails, Which workflow item should I use for Performance Approvals.
    Regards,

    I am trying to stop Performance Email Notifications , for this I have created custom notification mailer and redirected all emails to another email address, by doing this system is work according to requirement but unfortunately when we approve performance appraisal the email notifications are not redirecting to desired email address.
    Kindly suggest me how to redirect Performance Management Approval E-mail notifications

  • HR:Performance Appraisal:Can we Hide Prior Year Plans

    Is it possible to hide prior year performance appraisal plans from the Self service Talent Management Task List through personalization.
    If so How to accomplish ?.
    Regards,

    Q.1 If an appraisal form has been started for an employee and employee leaves the company, what should be done with the form as a best business practice? How is it best achieved?
    <i>A: There is no recommended procedure on how performance appraisals of terminated employees can be handled.  Users can continue to leave the appraisal form in the current state. 
    Alternatively, they could also "force change" the status to completed for terminated employees after a period of time.  This will terminate any active workflows last triggered upon between the ex-employee and the manager</i>
    Q.2 If an employee changes managers during the year all managers must be included in the appraisal process. Can this be done automatically? If so, should they be part appraisers?
    <i>A. Standard SAP seems not to cater for automated manager / appraiser change in the header when the employee switches manager. 
    One possible best practice you may want to consider is to activate the "change header" functionality for the appraisee to change the name of the manager themselves.  Alternative, the task can be assigned to the appraisals administrator.</i>

  • Default menu level expand

    Hi,
    I would like to have the detailed navigation expand on its first level by default.
    Example
    - Role Test (entry point)
    - - Workset Test (2nd level header)
    - - - Item1
    - - - Folder1
    - - - - Item2
    - - - - Folder2
    - - - - - Item3
    Now it opens like
    > Item1
    > Folder1
    I would like it to open like:
    > Item1
    - Folder1
      > Item2
      > Folder2
    Could not find any properties to resolve this. Any suggestions?
    Greetings,
    Vincent

    Hi Vincent,
    It seems it is not possible by default. Perhaps you can adjust the current navigation yourself by changing the code (via PDK).
    I also read an article that may get you on your way:
    BSP/How-To: Build performance-efficient dynamic htmlb:tree
    Good luck.
    Noel
    BTW I didn't try it either

  • Implementing Performance appraisal in ESS.

    Dear Experts,
    we are using EP 7.0 with ESS 1.0. now our client wants to implement performance appraisal through ESS. Can any body give a detailed information how to proceed further and system information of HCM too.

    You first have to know whether you will use the predefined or flexible performance process. The iViews for the predefined process are available in the default ESS role. If you use the flexible, you should modify the portal config and OBN navigation.
    In this thread I posted some interesting notes for this: Re: Performance Management link not working

  • Predefined performance appraisal-ess

    Dear Gurus,
    I would like to know about the configuration part for predefined performance appraisal for EE
    so that,the EE can use it in the NWBC portal
    where and how to define the predefined appraisal in backend?
    Need help on this!

    Hi Archana,
    It should be explicitly hidden for Portal through a BADI HRHAP00_COL_ACCESS  which has to be called in the BSP  HAP_documnet only then it will be hidden.
    CODE inside the BADI
    if status_overview = 'In_process  '.
    if the logon person person is  Appraisee
       if  column to be displayed is Part appraiser comments column
                   hide column
       endif.
    endif.
    Edited by: abhishek nms on Dec 12, 2009 8:29 PM

  • Setting default volume level.

    I have a 2nd Gen Nano which I am using in my car. I have an OEM adapter which connects to the iPod through the dock adapter and allows the car's stereo controls to operate the iPod. (The stereo thinks it's a really big CD changer.)
    My problem is that the sound level from the iPod is significantly lower than that from either the radio or the actual CD changer, so when I have finished listening to the iPod I have to be careful and remember to crank the volume way down or else the radio blasts when I select a different source.
    Looking at the iPod I have made sure that the volume limit is set to maximum, and I am confident that I don't have a EU crippled unit since the sound level through the earbuds is plenty loud even at half volume and keeps going up from there.
    The thing is that when it first wakes up the volume level is always set to 50% on the slider. I cannot manually change the volume level when connected to the car because when it's connected to the adapter the iPod's controls don't work (besides it is mounted in a fairly inaccessible location), but I don't even know if doing so would help since it communicates with the stereo through the dock connector.
    My question is: Does the iPod's volume control have any effect on the signal level out through the dock connector, and if so is there a way to permanently adjust the default volume level the unit uses when it starts up? What I'd like to do is set the default volume level on the iPod to, say, 75% or whatever will balance it with the other source input levels that the car stereo uses. I tried adjusting the volume manually and then sliding the lock switch to 'Lock' but it didn't work.
    Thanks in advance.

    This sounds like the problem that I'm experiencing and <a href-"http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=2694517#2694517">aske d about a couple of days ago. The sound level resets to 50% after shutdown.
    I tried setting the levels in Audio MIDI Set Up as suggested above, but that hasn't changed anything.
    In answer to B_web, I am running my external speakers through the headphone jack.
    So, any other suggestions?

  • Default Privilege Level for ASA users authenticated by Radius or TACACS when using ASDM

    Hello,
    I'm trying to figure out what the default privilege level is for users that are authenticated to the ASA via a remote authentication server when using the ASDM.
    the command "aaa authentication http console TACACS+ LOCAL" is used in the ASA config.
    The remote server is NOT setting any privilege levels for users.  There are also no aaa authorization commands present in the config.
    So what privilege level do the users receive when they login with the ASDM?  I'm being told that the users receive admin access which includes config write, reboot, and debug.  But I cannot find any documentation stating hte default level.
    Please advise.  And providing links to cisco documentation would be great too.
    Thanks,
    Brendan

    Hi Berendan,
    Hope the below exerpt from document clarifies your query. also i have provided the link to refer.
    About Authorization
    Authorization controls access per user after users authenticate. You can configure the security appliance to authorize the following items:
    •Management commands
    •Network access
    •VPN access
    Authorization controls the services and commands available to each authenticated user. Were you not to enable authorization, authentication alone would provide the same access to services for all authenticated users.
    If you need the control that authorization provides, you can configure a broad authentication rule, and then have a detailed authorization configuration. For example, you authenticate inside users who attempt to access any server on the outside network and then limit the outside servers that a particular user can access using authorization.
    The security appliance caches the first 16 authorization requests per user, so if the user accesses the same services during the current authentication session, the security appliance does not resend the request to the authorization server.
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa80/asdm60/user/guide/usrguide/aaasetup.html
    Regards
    Karthik

  • 2nd level navigation

    Hi Community,
    we have a fpn working here with RRA. Filter_id's are implemented in the consumer portal desktops. Navigation is built by roles
    RoleA (Entry Point, Filter_id = A, Merge_id = x)
    - RoleB(Entry Point, Filter_id = A, Merge_id = x)
      - FolderA
      - FolderB
    - RoleC(Entry Point, Filter_id = A, Merge_id = x)
      - FolderC
    If i call a desktop which has no elements with the filter_id all entry points appear, which means 1st, 2nd level and detailed navigation (correctly). So i guess its no permission problem. But if i call a desktop with filter id "A" only first level appears.
    I tried
    - different merge id's to merge all under RoleA (e.g. RoleA merge_id = x, RoleBC merge_id = xd)
    - not to filter second level
    - defining folder as entry points and roles not
    Someone knows how to merge and filter them correctly? Help please.
    Thanks & Regards

    Hi,
    Check this weblog.
    EFP: Working with the new Taglibs - Part 3
    Reward useful answers
    Regards,
    Ganesh N

  • Performance appraisal in ESS

    Hi,
    we are using ecc5.0 and we have requiement from client on performance appraisal.
    In ess employee should be able to fill the self appraisal and submit to manager.The manager should be able to open performance review form and fill the form and send both the self appraisal form and performanace appraisal form to hr after signing.
    Is there any standard functionality in ecc5.0?
    Thanks in advance,
    Usha

    What you are looking for can be done with standard with all the below activities.
    1. Configure appraisal templates using PHAP_CATALOG_PA.
    2. Create BSP iView for appraisal templates for employees, managers and others in portal using BSP application 'HAP_DOCUMENT-documents_received_open2.htm' (appraisal for employees) and 'HAP_DOCUMENT-documents_todo.htm' for managers and others.
    Also, refer to SAP help on how to configure Appraisal templates. let me know if you need any further details.

Maybe you are looking for

  • 4215 EoS and cisco general EoS policy

    Hello, Can anybody help me on this matter: I'm finding a discrepancy between Cisco general EoS policy and the 4215 EoS announcement. As per Cisco general EoS policy: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_end-of-life_policy.html Software suppor

  • Mountain Lion push email - server name best practice

    Would anyone be able to guide a newbie with advice on server naming for a mac mini?  I have a public web presence but want to direct incoming email through the server for push email to iOS devices, i.e iPhones.  The server will also be a VPN to the i

  • Workflow and BSP?

    Hallo, how difficult is it to use workflow with BSP? 1)Are there tools orde wizzards, WYSIWYG to set up the workflow with bsp? 2) How is to realize the connection between workflow-container and BSP? 3) Is ist possible to attach files to a BSP and sto

  • IPad1 cannot use iOS6, can it? If cannot, so what is the iPad1 use for next days?

    Dear Apple, What about the future of iPad1?

  • MediaSource 5 doesn't recognize my Zen X

    Hi, I had to do a reinstall of Windows XP recently, and once it was done, I downloaded MediaSource 5 and the driver compatible with Xtras running on version 2.0 or less -- I installed both. MediaSource 5 runs fine on its own, and the Zen Xtra is dete