Performance degradation after migration from 2.3 to 3.1

We are in process of migrating from 2.3 to 3.1 and we have seen that application in 3.1 in studio takes 4-5 mins to load and often crashes.
- Records in Data domain ~ 1 million
- 100+ Views
- Since we were migrating from 2.3 to 3.1, we kept it in one collection
- most of the charts are powered by views
studio log and data domain log are not showing any errors or warnings.
any pointers as where I should be looking at to identify the problem?
regards

Did this recommendations helped you to resolve your performance issues ?
Hi Thiago-Pereira-Oracle
We have a similar upgrade from 2.2 to 3.1 where we are struggling to achieve the desired performance .
1. there were applications with > 700 views and we consolidated to bring it down to 400 views
2. there is difference in performance with single dataset vs multiple dataset [7] (this approach was taken due to guided navigation issues using single dataset, where unselected refinements records were also displayed]
3. Volume of records are not very high
4. Can we get more details on the 3.1 studio hot fix /patch details that can resolve these issues?
5. There are customized chart components in 2.2 (with dropdown) which are not supported in 3.1 , as a result , we are creating separate views to handle different dropdown values.
6. We enabled cache warming - it helped our cause but still the response times are higher than 2.2.

Similar Messages

Performance analysis after migrating from windows to linux.

Hi Friends,
We are on RHEL 5 , EBS 11.5.10.2 , and recently migrated from windows 2003 server to RHEL5. i have couple of questions rendering in my mind .
1.How can i estimate EBS performance difference from Windows to RHEL5?
2. any querys or scripts to analyse the responce time for Forms and DB?
Please help me out if you have any scripts or links to the above scenario.
Thanks in Advance.
Raghu

Hi Raghu;
We are on RHEL 5 , EBS 11.5.10.2 , and recently migrated from windows 2003 server to RHEL5. i have couple of questions rendering in my mind .
1.How can i estimate EBS performance difference from Windows to RHEL5?Please check :
A Primer on Migrating Oracle Applications to a New Platform
http://blogs.oracle.com/stevenChan/
2. any querys or scripts to analyse the responce time for Forms and DB?Please check:
General EBS Discussion
Hope it helps
Regard
Helios

System performance degrades after server migration ???

Hi Friends,
System performance degrades after we migrate our BW 3.5 Server (Production) from UK to Germany.
for details :
1. Data is coming to Informatica server from Informatica its going to POSDM Server (Point of Sales Data Management) from POSDM we are running pipes and data is coming to BW (Delta Queqe)
so before Server Migration it was taking 2 Hrs to load 4 Million Records
After Server Migration it is taking 4 Hrs.
Please help out to find the reason for this.
Note : Server Ram , Hard Disk , Speed is same on both Servers
Thanks
Asim

Note : Server Ram , Hard Disk , Speed is same on both Servers
Are you cahnge any application or database parameter (the OS and all patch'es are the same?)
How you doing migration? Very low information... Are you check the network configuration are the same( for example check the network speed 1G or 100MB).
Are you trying to analyse the St03N and St04 t-codes?
Regards.

Performance degradation after setting filesystemio_option=setall from none.

Hi All,
We have facing performance degradation after setting filesystemio_option=setall from none on my two servers as mentioned below.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 7) 2.6.9 55.ELhugemem (32-bit)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.2 (Tikanga) 2.6.18 92.1.10.el5 (64-bit)
We are seeing lots of Disk I/O happening. We expected "*filesystemio_option=setall* " will improve performance but it is degrading. We getting slowness complains.
Please let me know do we need to set somethign else along with this ...like any otimizer parameter( e.g. optimizer_index_cost_adj, optimizer_index_caching).
Please help.

Hi Suraj,
<speculation>
You switched filesystemio_options to setall from none, so, the most likely reason for performance degradation after switching to setall is the implementation of directio. Direct I/O will skip the filesystem buffer cache, and and allow Oracle to read directly from disk to the database buffer cache. However, on a system where direct I/O is not implemented, which is what you had until you recently messed with that parameter, it's likely that you had an undersized database buffer cache, but that was ok, because many (most) of the physical I/Os your database was doing, were actually being serviced by the O/S filesystem buffer cache. But, you introduced direct I/O, and wiped out the ability of the O/S to service any physical I/Os from filesystem buffer cache. This means that every cache miss on the database buffer cache, turns into a real, physical, spin-the-disk, move-the-drive-head, physical I/O. And, you are suffering the performance consequences.
</speculation>
Ok, end of speculation. Now, assuming that what I've outlined above is actually going on, what to do? Why is direct I/O lower performing than buffered, non-direct I/O? Shouldn't it's performance be superior?
Well, when you have an established system that's using buffered I/O, and you switch to direct I/O, you almost always will have to increase the size of the database buffer cache. The problem is that you took a huge chunk of memory away from the the O/S, that it was using to buffer your I/Os and avoid physical I/O. So, now, you need to make up for it, by increasing the size of the database buffer cache. You can do this, without buying more memory for the box, because the O/S is no longer going to need to use so much memory for filesystem buffers.
So, what to do? Is it worth switching? Well, on balance, it makes sense to use direct I/O, and give Oracle a larger database buffer cache, for the simple fact that (particularly on a server that's dedicated to being an Oracle database server), Oracle has far more sophisticated caching algorithms, and a better understanding of the various types of data being cached, and so should be able to make more efficient use of the memory, than the (relatively) brain dead caching algorithms of the kernel and filesystem mechanisms.
But, once again, it all comes down to this:
What problem are you trying to solve? Did you have any I/O related issues? Do you have any compelling reason to implement direct I/O? Rule #1 is "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." Did you just violate rule #1? :-)
Finally, since you're on Linux, you can use the 'free' command to see how much memory is on the box, how much is free, and how much is dedicated to filesystem cache buffers. This response is already pretty long, so, I'm not going to get into details, however, if you're not familiar with the command, the results could be misleading. Read the man page, and try to be clear about understanding it before you make any assumptions about the output.
Hope that helps,
-Mark

Testing of SAP BW system after migration from OS Unix to windows

Hi Experts,
I am working on a project wherein testing of BW system is required after migration from OS Unix to Windows.
If any one has done same set of activities in past or has any idea of this, please share all major test steps required after migration.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Neeraj

Hi Neeraj,
I will paste the list we used for our upgrade from 3.1 to 7.0. I removed some company specific details. Sorry for the "lay-out", it is copied from excel, this messes up the whole message.
best regards, André.
Preparation     PHASE 1
Review New Functionality     Review BW section on SAPNet for latest information on new release
Confirm Upgrade Timing (First Sat)
GUI Upgrade     Install GUI's for Upgrade Test persons
"Check Prerequisites     -Operating System
-SAP Kernel
-DBMS
-Disk space
-R/3 plugin
-BW software version and SP
Citrix.."
"Check Compatibility Reqs with other systems     APO
ECC6.0"
Check Compatibility Reqs with 3rd party software     ?
"Test Team 2004s Delta Training     To
have idea on new functionality
not have confusion if looks different.."
"End User Communication: upgraded system and changes     e.g. right vs left click
- send out communication twice"
End User Communication: several "look and feel" sessions NOTE: incorporate WISBECH !!!
Setup Portal connected to BW QA for testing once upgraded     Setup Portal connected to BW DEV for testing once upgraded
Check best go live date - based on assuption 2 days needed
Determine test set - based on input BS / KU
Estimate resources Business for testing
BluePrint     PHASE 2
Check/CleanUp Development Objects     Check all open and not-released developments for release prior to upgrade
Prepare System Setup     Prepare (if needed) flat-files for test loads
Check OSS for release notes on objects     Each functional area should check out OSS for release notes on objects (for changes etcu2026, new functionality)
"Prepare (detail) list of objects to be tested     Complete list of objects to be tested, special attention to custom/non-standard programs, enhancements. List of:
- extractors
- process chains
- reports"
"Setup delta mechanisms (create transaction data)     BackEnd Test: Financial Extraction and load, process chains
u2022tbd
u2022
u2022 "
Verification / creation of process chains     Check existence of to-be-tested process chains; if none, create 'sample' process chains
Realization     PHASE 3
Prior to Upgrade: Install any necessary frontend software
Prior to Upgrade: Install any necessary frontend software (end-users)
Prior to Upgrade: Complete any extraction - suspend V3 and scheduled BW jobs
Create Sandbox
Connect Sandbox to external systems (connections/BDLS)
Pre-upgrade steps
Perform Upgrade of BW
Check connection with R/3/APO
Perform system backup
"BackEnd Test: Logistics extraction and load, process chains
u2022 Z_example_CHAIN
u2022 2lis_03_BF and 2lis_03_BX     Test:
- Extractor within process chain preferably otherwise mimic behavior (drop index, load, rebuild, aggragate etc)
- Delta extraction"
"BackEnd Test: Sales Extraction and load, process chains
u2022 Z_SALES_1
u2022 all lis extractors:
u2022 12_vcitm
u2022 13_vditm
u2022 11_vaitm
u2022 11_vahdr
u2022 11_v_ssl
u2022 11_vasti
u2022 12_vcscl
u2022 selection of z-extractors
     Test:
- Extractor within process chain preferably otherwise mimic behavior (drop index, load, rebuild, aggragate etc)
- Delta extraction"
"BackEnd Test: Financial Extraction and load, process chains
u2022 0FI_GL_4
u2022 NOTE: no further extractors are chosen for testing
u2022 tbd     Test:
- Extractor within process chain preferably otherwise mimic behavior (drop index, load, rebuild, aggragate etc)
- Delta extraction"
"BackEnd Test: Master Data... Extraction and load, process chains     Test:
- Extractor within process chain preferably otherwise mimic behavior (drop index, load, rebuild, aggragate etc)
- Delta extraction"
"BackEnd Test: Zxxx Extraction and load, process chains
u2022 Z_TRANSACTION_DATA
u2022 Zxxx
u2022 Zyyy     Test:
- Extractor within process chain preferably otherwise mimic behavior (drop index, load, rebuild, aggragate etc)
- Delta extraction"
"BackEnd Test: Plant Maintenance Extraction and load, process chains     Test:
- Extractor within process chain preferably otherwise mimic behavior (drop index, load, rebuild, aggragate etc)
- Delta extraction"
BackEnd Test: PP Extraction and load, process chains     Test: load from Zxxx
"BackEnd Test: Purchasing Extraction and load, process chains     Test:
- Extractor within process chain preferably otherwise mimic behavior (drop index, load, rebuild, aggragate etc)
- Delta extraction"
"BackEnd Test: APO Extraction and load, process chains
u2022 ZAPOxxx
u2022 ZAPOyyy
u2022 others can be tested, but were not included in de testset     Test:
- Extractor within process chain preferably otherwise mimic behavior (drop index, load, rebuild, aggragate etc)
- Delta extraction"
BackEnd Test: Regular Schedule - Production
BackEnd Test: Flat file upload     Test: 2 types from server and PC
BackEnd Test: Test Admin Workbench: creation of objects, change existing     Test the Admin Workbench: creation of infoobjects, change infoobject, create/change hierarchy, create cube,u2026
BackEnd Test: Test Bex: creation of queries (kf etc...); change existing     Creation of new query/ change query, create condition, calculated/restricted kf, variables,..
BackEnd Test: Issue handling
Development box issue fixing - on forehand     apply fixes based on issues BWQ
FrontEnd Test: Run Logistics Reports (log results in Reports tab)     Run reports, execute various navigation steps, make sure to execute each item of menu paths,validate no loss of functionality, report new functionality. Run few managed bookmarks
FrontEnd Test: Run Sales Reports (log results in Reports tab)     Run reports, execute various navigation steps, make sure to execute each item of menu paths,validate no loss of functionality, report new functionality. Run few managed bookmarks
FrontEnd Test: Run Supply Chain Reports (log results in Reports tab)     Run reports, execute various navigation steps, make sure to execute each item of menu paths,validate no loss of functionality, report new functionality. Run few managed bookmarks
FrontEnd Test: Run Financial Reports (log results in Reports tab)     Run reports, execute various navigation steps, make sure to execute each item of menu paths,validate no loss of functionality, report new functionality. Run few managed bookmarks
FrontEnd Test: Run Controling Reports     Run reports, execute various navigation steps, make sure to execute each item of menu paths,validate no loss of functionality, report new functionality. Run few managed bookmarks
FrontEnd Test: Run Master Data and Special Reports (log results in Reports tab)     Run reports, execute various navigation steps, make sure to execute each item of menu paths,validate no loss of functionality, report new functionality. Run few managed bookmarks
FrontEnd Test: Run PM Reports (log results in Reports tab)     Run reports, execute various navigation steps, make sure to execute each item of menu paths,validate no loss of functionality, report new functionality. Run few managed bookmarks
FrontEnd Test: Run Purchasing Reports (log results in Reports tab)     Run reports, execute various navigation steps, make sure to execute each item of menu paths,validate no loss of functionality, report new functionality. Run few managed bookmarks
FrontEnd Test: Run APO Reports (log results in Reports tab)     Run reports, execute various navigation steps, make sure to execute each item of menu paths,validate no loss of functionality, report new functionality. Run few managed bookmarks
FrontEnd Test: Issue handling
FrontEnd Test: Make before image of reports - Production     Run reports; save of before image to compare once upgraded
FrontEnd Test: Run All Reports - Production     Run reports, execute various navigation steps, compare with 'before image' taken in prevous step
Test Security     Test security with various end-user roles/IDS other than BW developer (usually has * ALL)
Test Portal integration     Test portal with various end-user roles/IDS other than BW developer (usually has * ALL)
Edited by: A. Nagelhout on Feb 12, 2010 10:50 AM
Edited by: A. Nagelhout on Feb 12, 2010 10:50 AM
Edited by: A. Nagelhout on Feb 12, 2010 10:52 AM
Edited by: A. Nagelhout on Feb 12, 2010 10:52 AM

Can only access emails through OWA after migration from exchange 2007 to 2013

can only access emails through OWA after migration from exchange 2007 to 2013, in other words unable to access mails through outlook or from other Applications services.
needed RCA ... plz help..

Hi,
From your description, you can send and receive messages only when you use OWA after migration from Exchange 2007 to Exchange 2013. If I have misunderstood your concern, please let me know.
In your case, I recommend you create a new test mailbox in your Exchange 2013 and check if you can send and receive messages on Outlook. If yes, it is recommended to create a new profile to solve this issue.
Hope this can be helpful to you.
Best regards,
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

After Migrating from 10g to 11g Geeting problems with Guided navigations.

After Migrating from 10g to 11g Geeting problems with Guided navigations and section navigations not working.
And we are getting the following error <<odbc driver returned an error (SQLExecDirectW)>> where we have used navigations.
In 10G we have Guided navigation Reports to display the Reports links and intermediate reports for conditionally displaying the Dashboard section(Reports) but after migrating to 11g Guided navigation reports and conditional reports are not working..
We know that in 11g section navigation replaced with conditions and Guided navigation replaced with action link.. but
do we need to recreate those reports in actions and condition or is there any work around avoid reworking.

Hi Both,
Thanks for the reply ...
For Guided navigation we are getting like below error:
Odbc driver returned an error (SQLExecDirectW).
For Conditional dashboard section we are getting like below error:
"saw.aViewsToRefresh = [];saw.aViewsToRefresh['d:dashboard~p:1egt6il5utl0uu8n~s:3jsmgfs3c1r4tn7c~n:condition'] = true;saw.aViewsToRefresh['d:dashboard~p:1egt6il5utl0uu8n~s:nos5q43jvjmi643b~n:condition'] = true;"

Hotkey (Ctrl+B) is not working after migration from Forms 6i to 10g

Dear Gurus,
Need your help regarding the following problem:
After migrating from Forms 6i to 10g (Rel 2), Ctrl+B (used to list the blocks in a form) hotkey is not working anymore (all other hotkeys are working fine). I've checked my FMRWEB.RES and it contains an entry for Ctrl+B:
66 : 2 : "Ctrl+B" : 70 : "Block Menu"
Additional Information:
OS: AIX
NLS_LANG = UTF8
fmrweb_utf8.res also contains the same text for Ctrl+B as above.
I tried to reproduce it on my Windows Machine (with NLS_LANG set to AMERICAN_AMERICA.WE8ISO8859P1) and its not working as well. I don't have right to put move files on AIX server but i can try anything (on my local system) suggested by the Oracle gurus.
Best Regards,

Dear Gerd,
"are you sure, that it is the hotkey"
Yes, i am dead sure. Since:
(1) It was working fine in forms 6i
(2) If you run a form and select Help => Keys, you will see Ctrl+B on the top of list
The problem is its not taking into account the keys which i am defining in the file (although i am following the same procedure detailed on metalink.oracle.com).
Regards

NQS ERROR:14025 NO FACT TABLE EXISTS -after migrating from 10g to 11g

NQS ERROR:14025 NO FACT TABLE EXISTS AT THE REQUESTED LEVEL OF DETAIL in all the reports after migrating from 10g to 11g ...
then we applied the patch (One-off Patch for Bug: 11850704) for the error <<NQS ERROR:14025 NO FACT TABLE EXISTS AT THE REQUESTED LEVEL OF DETAIL>>
But after applying the above the above patch we are still getting the same error.
but in the above patch instructions file - Post deployment instructions to create the Variable
Post Install Instructions:
- To revert to the 10g navigator behavior for handling conforming dimensions,
you must set the following session variable via an init block in the RPD:
NO_FORCE_TO_DETAIL_BIN=1
The default value for the above variable is 0.
- Restart all servers (Admin Server and all Managed Server(s))
but we didn’t find the process to create the specified variable and Initialization block in the RPD
Can you please suggest us how to go further.
Our questions are:

Hi
Refer the below thread.
obiee 11g non-conforming dimensions and nQSError 14025
Might be help you/
Thanks,
satya

Mail "unexpectedly quits" after migration from snow leopard to new iMac running Mountain Lion

Mail "unexpectedly quits" after migration from snow leopard time machine files to new iMac running Mountain Lion. I can run connection doctor OK. But the activity window is blank. If you try to open message viewer window then mail program crashes. Would really like to get my old emails back as the old imac is totally dead. Thanks for any help.

Launch the Console application in any of the following ways:
☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Console in the icon grid.
Step 1
Make sure the title of the Console window is All Messages. If it isn't, select All Messages from the SYSTEM LOG QUERIES menu on the left.
Enter the name of the crashed application or process in the Filter text field. Post the messages from the time of the last crash, if any — the text, please, not a screenshot.
When posting a log extract, be selective. In most cases, a few dozen lines are more than enough.
Please do not indiscriminately dump thousands of lines from the log into a message.
Important: Some private information, such as your name, may appear in the log. Edit it out by search-and-replace in a text editor before posting.
Step 2
Still in the Console window, look under User Diagnostic Reports for crash reports related to the process. The report name starts with the name of the crashed process, and ends with ".crash". Select the most recent report and post the entire contents — again, the text, not a screenshot. In the interest of privacy, I suggest that, before posting, you edit out the “Anonymous UUID,” a long string of letters, numbers, and dashes in the header of the report, if it’s present (it may not be.) Please don’t post shutdownStall, spin, or hang logs — they're very long and not helpful.

Cant find my iTunes library after migration from old PC to new Mac

Can't find my iTunes library after migration from old PC to new Mac?

Migration Assistant has transferred itunes content, but where is it on new iMac?
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3358162?start=0&tstart=0 <<< click here for a possible answer.

Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query

Hi All,
There is a Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query in a report painter.
This query is working fine when executed in 4.7 system where as it is running for more time in ECC6.0.
Select query is on the table COSP.
SELECT (FIELD_LIST)
        INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE I_COSP PACKAGE SIZE 1000
        FROM COSP CLIENT SPECIFIED
        WHERE GJAHR IN SELR_GJAHR
          AND KSTAR IN SELR_KSTAR
          AND LEDNR EQ '00'
          AND OBJNR IN SELR_OBJNR
          AND PERBL IN SELR_PERBL
          AND VERSN IN SELR_VERSN
          AND WRTTP IN SELR_WRTTP
          AND MANDT IN MANDTTAB
        GROUP BY (GROUP_LIST).
   LOOP AT I_COSP      .
     COSP                           = I_COSP      .
     PERFORM PCOSP       USING I_COSP-_COUNTER.
     CLEAR: $RWTAB, COSP                          .
     CLEAR CCR1S                         .
   ENDLOOP.
ENDSELECT.
I have checked with the table indexes, they were same as in 4.7 system.
What can be the reson for the difference in execution time. How can this be reduced without adjusting the select query.
Thanks in advance for the responses.
Regards,
Dedeepya.

Hi,
ohhhhh....... lots of problems in select query......this is not the way you should write it.
Some generic comments:
1. never use SELECT
                   endselect.
   SELECT
into table
   for all entries in table
where.
   use perform statment after this selection.
2. Do not use into corresponding fields. use exact structure type.
3. use proper sequence of fields in the where condition so that it helps table go according to indexes.
    e.g in your case
          sequence should be
LEDNR
OBJNR
GJAHR
WRTTP
VERSN
KSTAR
HRKFT
VRGNG
VBUND
PARGB
BEKNZ
TWAER
PERBL
sequence should be same as defined in table.
Always keep select query as simple as possible and perform all other calculations etc. afterwords.
I hope it helps.
Regards,
Pranaya

Increase in CPU Utilization after migration from APEX 3.1.2 to APEX 3.2

Has any noticed any increase in CPU Utilization after migrating from APEX 3.1.2 to APEX 3.2?
Thanks,
Mark

Hi Mark,
Take a look at some of the usage reports within APEX (sessions, page views etc) to get an overall feel for where the time is being consumed.
You'll also find it useful if you can run a statspack report (or AWR, ASH etc) during a busy period to be able to drill down into where that CPU is being spent.
There's no magic answers here unfortunately, you need to track it down to where the time is being spent before working back up to find out where best to tune it.
John.
Blog: http://jes.blogs.shellprompt.net
Work: http://www.apex-evangelists.com
Author of Pro Application Express: http://tinyurl.com/3gu7cd
REWARDS: Please remember to mark helpful or correct posts on the forum, not just for my answers but for everyone!

STP playback is erratic after migrating from 10.4.11 to 10.5.8

After migrating from 10.4.11 to 10.5.8
SoundTrack Pro playback is erratic,
i.e; audio stops and starts with a few small click noises.
Your suggestions will be mostly appreciated.

Thanks for your reply.
STP version 2.0.2
Audio is straight out no interface and works fine besides erratic stop-start playback.

ZCC Login failed after Migration from 11.3.1 FRU1 to 11.3.2

Hey,
System: 6 Primary Server Sless 11 SP3
LDAP: EDIR
Primary: 11.3.2
Sats: 11.3.1 FRU1
After Migration from 11.3.1 FRU1 to 11.3.2
i'll try to login in ZCC
Message ZCC
Error: Login Error: com.novell.zenworks.datamodel.exceptions.InternalD ataModelException: javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: java.security.cert.CertificateException: Certificates does not conform to algorithm constraints
See the ZENworks Control Center log file (zcc.log) for the full stack trace.
I tryed with default admin and see that the USERSource is not reachable.
I take a look in the configuration / usersource and there is an Error like: Unable to read contexts. One or more of your connections don't support non-SSL.
ZCC.log sayed
[javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: java.security.cert.CertificateException: Certificates does not conform to algorithm constraints] [] [com.novell.zenworks.datamodel.exceptions.InternalD ataModelException] [ZENServer]
[DEBUG] [12/30/2014 09:54:02.417] [3547] [ZENServer] [72] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Form.java CSRF TOKEN:d1b804076c63e7393af1a72442ced4b5 for the PageId:authoritativeSourceDetails] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
[DEBUG] [12/30/2014 09:54:03.144] [3547] [ZENServer] [85] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [QuickTask build tasks called in createChildControls, normal flow before ajax] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
[DEBUG] [12/30/2014 09:54:03.348] [3547] [ZENServer] [69] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [com.novell.zenworks.datamodel.exceptions.InternalD ataModelException: javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: java.security.cert.CertificateException: Certificates does not conform to algorithm constraints
at com.novell.zenworks.datamodel.services.Certificate ManagerImpl.getCertificates(CertificateManagerImpl .java:179)
at com.novell.zenworks.datamodel.utils.ldap.LDAPUtil. validateCertificateExpiry(LDAPUtil.java:1162)
at com.novell.zenworks.datamodel.utils.ldap.LDAPUtil. getLDAPConnectionInfo(LDAPUtil.java:774)
at com.novell.zenworks.datamodel.utils.ldap.LDAPUtil. getLDAPConnectionInfo(LDAPUtil.java:559)
at com.novell.zenworks.datamodel.utils.ldap.LDAPUtil. getLDAPConnectionInfo(LDAPUtil.java:386)
at com.novell.zenworks.datamodel.utils.ldap.LDAPUtil. getLDAPConnectionInfo(LDAPUtil.java:359)
at com.novell.zenworks.datamodel.utils.ldap.LDAPUtil. getLDAPConnectionInfo(LDAPUtil.java:325)
at com.novell.zenworks.datamodel.utils.ldap.LDAPUtil. getLDAPConnectionInfo(LDAPUtil.java:311)
at com.novell.zenworks.core.web.internal.UserSourceSt atusAJAX.getImageData(UserSourceStatusAJAX.java:77 )
at com.novell.web.ajax.ImageAJAX.service(ImageAJAX.ja va:38)
at com.novell.web.ajax.AJAXDataHandler.service(AJAXDa taHandler.java:40)
at com.novell.web.AjaxServlet.serviceImpl(AjaxServlet .java:100)
at com.novell.web.AjaxServlet.service(AjaxServlet.jav a:74)
at com.novell.zenworks.fw.web.internal.ZENworksAjaxSe rvlet.service(ZENworksAjaxServlet.java:47)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet .java:727)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.in ternalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:303)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.do Filter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:208)
at com.patchlink.sapphire.web.pages.vulnerability.ses sion.HibernateSessionFilter.doFilter(HibernateSess ionFilter.java:75)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.in ternalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:241)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.do Filter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:208)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invo ke(StandardWrapperValve.java:220)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invo ke(StandardContextValve.java:122)
at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBas e.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:501)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke( StandardHostValve.java:171)
at com.googlecode.psiprobe.Tomcat70AgentValve.invoke( Tomcat70AgentValve.java:39)
at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke (ErrorReportValve.java:103)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invok e(StandardEngineValve.java:116)
at com.novell.zenworks.tomcat.ZENRequestValve.invoke( ZENRequestValve.java:1346)
at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.servic e(CoyoteAdapter.java:408)
at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.p rocess(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:1070)
at org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$AbstractConnect ionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:611)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$SocketProce ssor.run(JIoEndpoint.java:316)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker( ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskThread$Wrapping Runnable.run(TaskThread.java:61)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
Caused by: javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: java.security.cert.CertificateException: Certificates does not conform to algorithm constraints
at sun.security.ssl.Alerts.getSSLException(Alerts.jav a:192)
at sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.fatal(SSLSocketImpl .java:1884)
at sun.security.ssl.Handshaker.fatalSE(Handshaker.jav a:276)
at sun.security.ssl.Handshaker.fatalSE(Handshaker.jav a:270)
at sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker.serverCertificat e(ClientHandshaker.java:1439)
at sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker.processMessage(C lientHandshaker.java:209)
at sun.security.ssl.Handshaker.processLoop(Handshaker .java:878)
at sun.security.ssl.Handshaker.process_record(Handsha ker.java:814)
at sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.readRecord(SSLSocke tImpl.java:1016)
at sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.performInitialHands hake(SSLSocketImpl.java:1312)
at sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.startHandshake(SSLS ocketImpl.java:1339)
at sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.startHandshake(SSLS ocketImpl.java:1323)
at com.novell.zenworks.security.certificates.Certific ateUtility.getCertChain(CertificateUtility.java:12 1)
at com.novell.zenworks.datamodel.services.Certificate ManagerImpl.getCertificates(CertificateManagerImpl .java:175)
... 35 more
Caused by: java.security.cert.CertificateException: Certificates does not conform to algorithm constraints
at sun.security.ssl.AbstractTrustManagerWrapper.check AlgorithmConstraints(SSLContextImpl.java:946)
at sun.security.ssl.AbstractTrustManagerWrapper.check AdditionalTrust(SSLContextImpl.java:872)
at sun.security.ssl.AbstractTrustManagerWrapper.check ServerTrusted(SSLContextImpl.java:814)
at sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker.serverCertificat e(ClientHandshaker.java:1421)
SR has been created.
Any Tipps /Hints for me ?
Thank You

Originally Posted by robpet
Should have said kind of the same problem...
That was sort of my gut feelings so I checked our certificates beforehand and they are using certs with sha1 fingerprint. But we are not using SSL - our connections are made using port 389. And the communication status is green.
But I cannot add SSL because it complains about "unable to obtain a valid certificate for SSL communication information. Please verify that the adress and port are correct and that the LDAP directory has been configured with a valid certificate.
So I cannot understand why users cannot authenticate with zenagent.
There's a TID about zcc login failures after 11.3 upgrade.
https://www.novell.com/support/kb/doc.php?id=7014716
We ran into the above.

Performance degradation after migration from 2.3 to 3.1

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for