Performance degradation whit FAGLFLEXA in Report Painter

Hello guys,
I created one report in Report Painter, and the principal table is FAGLFLEXT, but the execution of this report is very slow.
The Basis of my company trace the execution of this report, and verify than the issue is FAGLFLEXA table, but I don't selected this table.
What should I do?
Thanks!
Kleber
PS.: Sorry my bad english

Hi,
define a ledger / record type, (eg in the general data selection).
Best regards, Christian

Similar Messages

Performance Degradation of HR Disco reports after upgrade from 1158 - 11510

Hi there
Has anyone else seen a degradation in performance between 4i and 10.1.2 on apps HR modules? Or indeed not against HR modules.
Following an upgrade from 1158 to 11510 we have seen significant downturn in performance of long standing HR reports. We are using Discoverer desktop in both cases and have a query that is scheduled overnight and usually completed in 2 hours using 4i against the 1158. Now it's taking more like 15 or more using discoverer 10.1.2 against the 11510 environment. We have tested using 4i against 11510 environment and this performs fine, in fact better than it used to in 1158, so it looks like Discoverer 1012 is causing the downturn in performance.
Anyone got anything to share on this??
Cheers, Kate
Message was edited by:
kaubon

Kaubon,
There is a difference between oracle 9i and 10g database.
If you are using optimizer_features_enable="9.2.0.8" to revert back to the old behavior then you are not utilizing the updated feature of 10g. You are making 10g to follow 9i behavior.
It is just like buying a new car and damaging it to get the feel of your old car.
We had the similar problem, but we fine tune all our queries according to 10g. Main problem was use of rules. You need to either remove those rules or modify those rules.
There are few good documents of 10g performance on metalink. You can refer to that.
All the best.
Soham khot
http://oracleappshr.blogspot.com

Report Painter Performance Issue

Helloo experts,
I have a report painter report which is pulling the data from a custom table (which has 32million records). Its taking a lot of time .
Is there any method to improve its performance ?

Hi,
Please check report painter selecting records using primary key or secondary index. If not please create secondary index for custom table (after consultation with basis, due to creating the secondary index will increase the load on server of custom table with 32 millions records)
If not possible. extract the resultset from custom table into another table and make query for report painter on that. and update the new table on daily basis or hourly basis.
aRs

Report Painter Report Performance Issue

hi,
My client facing the problem with Report painter reports , almost all the reports taking much amount of time to execute . we are Using 5.0 version tables FAGLFLEXT and CSSS . i have some doubts report index is the cause for this or any other reasons can any one help me in this regard,
thanks in advance
sasidhar.A

Hi,
just create a proper index and performance will increase. There are some SAP OSS notes who deal with this (for example field "client" should be added if'm not mistaken).
We did the same on profit center tables with huge performance increases
grtz
dries

Report painter performance problem...

I have a client which runs a report group consists of 14 reports... When we run this program... It takes about 20 minutes to get results... I was assigned to optimize this report...
This is what I've done so far
(this is a SAP generated program)...
1. I've checked the tables that the program are using... (a customized table with more than 20,000 entries and many others)
2. I've created secondary indexes to the main customized table with (20,000) entries - It improves the performance a bit(results about 18 minutes)...
3. I divided the report group by 4... 3 reports each report group... It greatly improves the performance... (but this is not what the client wants)...
4. I've read an article about report group performance that it is a bug.
(sap support recognized the fact that we are dealing with a bug in the sap standard functionality)
http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/sap-on-db2/sap-report-painter-performance-problem-26000
Anyone have the same problem as mine?
Edited by: christopher mancuyas on Sep 8, 2008 9:32 AM
Edited by: christopher mancuyas on Sep 9, 2008 5:39 AM

Report painter/Writer always creates a prerformance issue.i never preffred them since i have a option with Zreport
now you can do only one thing put more checks on selection-screen for filtering the data.i think thats the only way.
Amit.

Report Painter Report - Leading White Spaces in Cost Element

When calling up a report painter report, e.g. S_ALR_87013613, with cost element characteristic in Office integration/Microsoft Excel as output parameters, the cost element (row item) is indented with white spaces. The number of white spaces seems to be in relation with summation levels (sub-totals) visible in the left panel. For some cost centres that only have limited transactions, such as no posting to salary account group, there are less levels of summation, meaning less leading white space in cost elements. Is there any way to eliminate or have a fixed number of leading white spaces in cost elements?
We export the report to Excel worksheet for further processing. VLOOKUP function is used to read the cost element into another workbook. The inconsistent number of leading white spaces creates a problem for the formulas to work properly.
Any suggestion is appreciated.
Regards,

Hello,
There are different ways of downloading the report to excel. One option is
System ==> List ==> save (to local file)
Please try with other options.
If still not working, then the work around would be
You can put ctrl+H (replace all spaces)
Then text to columns
Hope this works.
Regards,
Ravi

SCOM reports "A significant portion of the database buffer cache has been written out to the system paging file. This may result in severe performance degradation"

This was discussed here, with no resolution
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/exchange2010/thread/bb073c59-b88f-471b-a209-d7b5d9e5aa28?prof=required
I have the same issue. This is a single-purpose physical mailbox server with 320 users and 72GB of RAM. That should be plenty. I've checked and there are no manual settings for the database cache. There are no other problems with
the server, nothing reported in the logs, except for the aforementioned error (see below).
The server is sluggish. A reboot will clear up the problem temporarily. The only processes using any significant amount of memory are store.exe (using 53GB), regsvc (using 5) and W3 and Monitoringhost.exe using 1 GB each. Does anyone have
any ideas on this?
Warning ESE Event ID 906.
Information Store (1497076) A significant portion of the database buffer cache has been written out to the system paging file. This may result in severe performance degradation. See help link for complete details of possible causes. Resident cache
has fallen by 213107 buffers (or 11%) in the last 207168 seconds. Current Total Percent Resident: 79% (1574197 of 1969409 buffers)

Brian,
We had this event log entry as well which SCOM picked up on, and 10 seconds before it the Forefront Protection 2010 for Exchange updated all of its engines.
We are running Exchange 2010 SP2 RU3 with no file system antivirus (the boxes are restricted and have UAC turned on as mitigations). We are running the servers primarily as Hub Transport servers with 16GB of RAM, but they do have the mailbox role installed
for the sole purpose of serving as our public folder servers.
So we theroized the STORE process was just grabbing a ton of RAM, and occasionally it was told to dump the memory so the other processes could grab some - thus generating the alert. Up until last night we thought nothing of it, but ~25 seconds after the
cache flush to paging file, we got the following alert:
Log Name:      Application
Source:        MSExchangeTransport
Date:          8/2/2012 2:08:14 AM
Event ID:      17012
Task Category: Storage
Level:         Error
Keywords:      Classic
User:          N/A
Computer:      HTS1.company.com
Description:
Transport Mail Database: The database could not allocate memory. Please close some applications to make sure you have enough memory for Exchange Server. The exception is Microsoft.Exchange.Isam.IsamOutOfMemoryException: Out of Memory (-1011)
   at Microsoft.Exchange.Isam.JetInterop.CallW(Int32 errFn)
   at Microsoft.Exchange.Isam.JetInterop.MJetOpenDatabase(MJET_SESID sesid, String file, String connect, MJET_GRBIT grbit, MJET_WRN& wrn)
   at Microsoft.Exchange.Isam.JetInterop.MJetOpenDatabase(MJET_SESID sesid, String file, MJET_GRBIT grbit)
   at Microsoft.Exchange.Isam.JetInterop.MJetOpenDatabase(MJET_SESID sesid, String file)
   at Microsoft.Exchange.Isam.Interop.MJetOpenDatabase(MJET_SESID sesid, String file)
   at Microsoft.Exchange.Transport.Storage.DataConnection..ctor(MJET_INSTANCE instance, DataSource source).
Followed by:
Log Name:      Application
Source:        MSExchangeTransport
Date:          8/2/2012 2:08:15 AM
Event ID:      17106
Task Category: Storage
Level:         Information
Keywords:      Classic
User:          N/A
Computer:      HTS1.company.com
Description:
Transport Mail Database: MSExchangeTransport has detected a critical storage error, updated the registry key (SOFTWARE\Microsoft\ExchangeServer\v14\Transport\QueueDatabase) and as a result, will attempt self-healing after process restart.
Log Name:      Application
Source:        MSExchangeTransport
Date:          8/2/2012 2:13:50 AM
Event ID:      17102
Task Category: Storage
Level:         Warning
Keywords:      Classic
User:          N/A
Computer:      HTS1.company.com
Description:
Transport Mail Database: MSExchangeTransport has detected a critical storage error and has taken an automated recovery action. This recovery action will not be repeated until the target folders are renamed or deleted. Directory path:E:\EXCHSRVR\TransportRoles\Data\Queue
is moved to directory path:E:\EXCHSRVR\TransportRoles\Data\Queue\Queue.old.
So it seems as if the Forefront Protection 2010 for Exchange inadvertently trigger the cache flush which didn't appear to happen quick or thuroughly enough for the transport service to do what it needed to do, so it freaked out and performed the subsequent
actions.
Do you have any ideas on how to prevent this 906 warning, which cascaded into a transport service outage?
Thanks!

Getting Error in Report painter

Dear All ,
i am getting an error after i execute a report in report painter,
Getting the following errors,
Characteristic Ledger does not exist
Characteristic Record Type does not exist
Characteristic Ledger does not exist
Message no. GR655
Diagnosis
The characteristic must (message type E) or should (message type W) be addressed in the report definition. This means that a set must/should exist for the characteristic in the definition of the report rows, report columns, or report selection.
For performance reasons, it is important that you limit the value ranges of those key fields located at the start of the database key as much as possible.
Procedure
Define a set for this characteristic in the report.
Note
In Controlling (Table CCSS), different characteristics (cost center, order, project, etc.) are portrayed internally with a common technical characteristic, "Object". In reports, either a specific characteristic such as cost center must be used, or the characteristic "Object" must be used directly. If this is not the case, an error message appears saying that the "Object" characteristic is missing.
regards
Man

Hi,
define a ledger / record type, (eg in the general data selection).
Best regards, Christian

Performance Degradation on HR module 4i to 10.1.2

Hi there
Has anyone else seen a degradation in performance between 4i and 10.1.2 on apps HR modules? Or indeed not against HR modules.
Following an upgrade from 1158 to 11510 we have seen significant downturn in performance of long standing HR reports. We are using Discoverer desktop in both cases and have a query that is scheduled overnight and usually completed in 2 hours using 4i against the 1158. Now it's taking more like 15 or more using discoverer 10.1.2 against the 11510 environment. We have tested using 4i agains 11510 and this performs fine, in fact better than it used to in 1158, so it looks like Discoverer 1012 is causing the downturn in performance.
Anyone got anything to share on this??
Cheers, Kate

we've looked at this more...
the explain plans were exactly the same between 4i and 10.1.2 so it wasn't to do with the aggregation strategy. seems it was due to the 10g database upgrade (set a DB parameter called optimizer_features_enable="9.2.0.8" to revert back to the old behaviour).
also a number of required E-Business database initialisation parameters were missing
kate

Performance degradation: unfetched field [PublishingPageContent] caused extra roundtrip

Hi All,
   I am facing some serious application pool crash in one of my customer's Production site SharePoint servers. The Application Error logs in the event Viewer says -
Faulting application name: w3wp.exe, version: 7.5.7601.17514, time stamp: 0x4ce7afa2
Faulting module name: ntdll.dll, version: 6.1.7601.17514, time stamp: 0x4ce7c8f9
Exception code: 0xc0000374
Fault offset: 0x00000000000c40f2
Faulting process id: 0x1414
Faulting application start time: 0x01ce5edada76109d
Faulting application path: c:\windows\system32\inetsrv\w3wp.exe
Faulting module path: C:\Windows\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll
Report Id: 5a69ec1e-cace-11e2-9be2-441ea13bf8be
At the same time the SharePoint ULS logs says -
1)
06/13/2013 03:44:29.53 w3wp.exe (0x0808)                       0x2DF0 SharePoint Foundation
        General                                8e2s
Medium              Unknown SPRequest error occurred. More information: 0x80070005      8b343224-4aa6-490c-8a2a-ce06ac160773
06/13/2013 03:44:35.03 w3wp.exe (0x0808)                       0x2DF0 SharePoint Foundation
        General
8e25      Medium              Failed to look up string with key "FSAdmin_SiteSettings_UserContextManagement_ToolTip", keyfile Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.
8b343224-4aa6-490c-8a2a-ce06ac160773
06/13/2013 03:44:35.03 w3wp.exe (0x0808)                       0x2DF0 SharePoint Foundation
        General                                8l3c
Medium              Localized resource for token 'FSAdmin_SiteSettings_UserContextManagement_ToolTip' could not be found for file with path: "C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web
Server Extensions\14\Template\Features\SearchExtensions\ExtendedSearchAdminLinks.xml".              8b343224-4aa6-490c-8a2a-ce06ac160773
2)
06/13/2013 03:44:29.01 w3wp.exe (0x0808)                       0x2DF0 SharePoint Foundation
        Web Parts
emt4     High       Error initializing Safe control - Assembly:Microsoft.Office.SharePoint.ClientExtensions, Version=14.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429c TypeName: Microsoft.Office.SharePoint.ClientExtensions.Publishing.TakeListOfflineRibbonControl
Error: Could not load type 'Microsoft.Office.SharePoint.ClientExtensions.Publishing.TakeListOfflineRibbonControl' from assembly 'Microsoft.Office.SharePoint.ClientExtensions, Version=14.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429c'.
8b343224-4aa6-490c-8a2a-ce06ac160773
06/13/2013 03:44:29.50 w3wp.exe (0x0808)
0x2DF0 SharePoint Foundation                 Logging Correlation Data
xmnv     Medium              Site=/    8b343224-4aa6-490c-8a2a-ce06ac160773
3)
06/13/2013 03:43:59.67 w3wp.exe (0x263C)                       0x24D8 SharePoint Foundation
        Performance                   9fx9
Medium              Performance degradation: unfetched field [PublishingPageContent] caused extra roundtrip.     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPListItem.GetValue(SPField fld,
Int32 columnNumber, Boolean bRaw, Boolean bThrowException)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPListItem.GetValue(String strName, Boolean bThrowException)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPListItem.get_Item(String fieldName)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.WebControls.BaseFieldControl.get_ItemFieldValue()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.WebControls.RichHtmlField.RenderFieldForDisplay(HtmlTextWriter output)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.WebControls.BaseFieldControl.Render(HtmlTextWriter
output)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.WebControls.BaseRichField.Render(HtmlTextWriter output)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.WebControls.RichHtmlField.R...
b8d0b8ca-8386-441f-8fce-d79fe72556e1
06/13/2013 03:43:59.67*               w3wp.exe (0x263C)
0x24D8 SharePoint Foundation                 Performance
9fx9       Medium              ...ender(HtmlTextWriter output)     at System.Web.UI.Control.RenderChildrenInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, ICollection
children)     at System.Web.UI.Control.RenderChildrenInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, ICollection children)     at System.Web.UI.Control.RenderChildrenInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, ICollection children)
at System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlContainerControl.Render(HtmlTextWriter writer)     at System.Web.UI.Control.RenderChildrenInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, ICollection children)     at System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlForm.RenderChildren(HtmlTextWriter
writer)     at System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlForm.Render(HtmlTextWriter output)     at System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlForm.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer)     at System.Web.UI.Control.RenderChildrenInternal(HtmlTextWrit...
b8d0b8ca-8386-441f-8fce-d79fe72556e1
06/13/2013 03:43:59.67*               w3wp.exe (0x263C)
0x24D8 SharePoint Foundation                 Performance
9fx9       Medium              ...er writer, ICollection children)     at System.Web.UI.Control.RenderChildrenInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer,
ICollection children)     at System.Web.UI.Page.Render(HtmlTextWriter writer)     at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)
at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)     at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest()     at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.TemplateRedirectionPage.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)     at System.Web.HttpApplication.CallHandlerExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute()     at System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionSte...
b8d0b8ca-8386-441f-8fce-d79fe72556e1
06/13/2013 03:43:59.67*               w3wp.exe (0x263C)
0x24D8 SharePoint Foundation                 Performance
9fx9       Medium              ...p step, Boolean& completedSynchronously)     at System.Web.HttpApplication.PipelineStepManager.ResumeSteps(Exception
error)     at System.Web.HttpApplication.BeginProcessRequestNotification(HttpContext context, AsyncCallback cb)     at System.Web.HttpRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationPrivate(IIS7WorkerRequest wr, HttpContext context)
at System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationHelper(IntPtr managedHttpContext, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags)     at System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotification(IntPtr managedHttpContext,
IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags)     at System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationHelper(IntPtr managedHttpContext, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr module...
b8d0b8ca-8386-441f-8fce-d79fe72556e1
06/13/2013 03:43:59.67*               w3wp.exe (0x263C)
0x24D8 SharePoint Foundation                 Performance
9fx9       Medium              ...Data, Int32 flags)     at System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotification(IntPtr managedHttpContext,
IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags)                b8d0b8ca-8386-441f-8fce-d79fe72556e1
06/13/2013 03:43:59.67 w3wp.exe (0x263C)
0x24D8 SharePoint Foundation                 Performance                   g4zd
High       Performance degradation: note field [PublishingPageContent] was not in demoted fields.          b8d0b8ca-8386-441f-8fce-d79fe72556e1
Anybody has any idea whats going on? I need to fix this ASAP as we are suppose to go live in next few days.
Soumalya

Hello Soumalya,
Do you have an update on your issue? We are actually experiencing a similar issue at a new customer.
- Dennis | Netherlands | Blog |
Twitter

Performance Degradation - High fetches and Prses

Hello,
My analysis on a particular job trace file drew my attention towards:
1) High rate of Parses instead of Bind variables usage.
2) High fetches and poor number/ low number of rows being processed
Please let me kno as to how the performance degradation can be minimised, Perhaps the high number of SQL* Net Client wait events may be due to multiple fetches and transactions with the client.
EXPLAIN PLAN FOR SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS (1) */ * FROM SAPNXP.INOB
WHERE MANDT = :A0
AND KLART = :A1
AND OBTAB = :A2
AND OBJEK LIKE :A3 AND ROWNUM <= :A4;
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse      119      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute    239      0.16       0.13          0          0          0           0
Fetch      239   2069.31    2127.88          0   13738804          0           0
total      597   2069.47    2128.01          0   13738804          0           0
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 1235313998
| Id | Operation                    | Name   | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |        |     2 |   268 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | COUNT STOPKEY               |        |       |       |            |          |
|* 2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| INOB   |     2 |   268 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 |    INDEX SKIP SCAN           | INOB~2 | 7514 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - filter(ROWNUM<=TO_NUMBER(:A4))
   2 - filter("OBJEK" LIKE :A3 AND "KLART"=:A1)
   3 - access("MANDT"=:A0 AND "OBTAB"=:A2)
       filter("OBTAB"=:A2)
18 rows selected.
SQL> SELECT INDEX_NAME,TABLE_NAME,COLUMN_NAME FROM DBA_IND_COLUMNS WHERE INDEX_OWNER='SAPNXP' AND INDEX_NAME='INOB~2';
INDEX_NAME      TABLE_NAME                     COLUMN_NAME
INOB~2          INOB                           MANDT
INOB~2          INOB                           CLINT
INOB~2          INOB                           OBTAB
Is it possible to Maximise the rows/fetch
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse      163      0.03       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute    163      0.01       0.03          0          0          0           0
Fetch   174899     55.26      59.14          0    1387649          0     4718932
total   175225     55.30      59.19          0    1387649          0     4718932
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 27
Rows     Row Source Operation
28952 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID EDIDC (cr=8505 pr=0 pw=0 time=202797 us)
28952   INDEX RANGE SCAN EDIDC~1 (cr=1457 pr=0 pw=0 time=29112 us)(object id 202995)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait Total Waited
----------------------------------------   Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client                  174899        0.00          0.16
SQL*Net more data to client                155767        0.01          5.69
SQL*Net message from client                174899        0.11        208.21
latch: cache buffers chains                     2        0.00          0.00
latch free                                      4        0.00          0.00
********************************************************************************

user4566776 wrote:
My analysis on a particular job trace file drew my attention towards:
1) High rate of Parses instead of Bind variables usage.
But if you look at the text you are using bind variables.
The first query is executed 239 times - which matches the 239 fetches. You cut off some of the useful information from the tkprof output, but the figures show that you're executing more than once per parse call. The time is CPU time spent using a bad execution plan to find no data -- this looks like a bad choice of index, possibly a side effect of the first_rows(1) hint.
2) High fetches and poor number/ low number of rows being processedThe second query is doing a lot of fetches because in 163 executions it is fetching 4.7 million rows at roughly 25 rows per fetch. You might improve performance a little by increasing the array fetch size - but probably not by more than a factor of 2.
You'll notice that even though you record 163 parse calls for the second statement the number of " Misses in library cache during parse" is zero - so the parse calls are pretty irrelevant, the cursor is being re-used.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
To post code, statspack/AWR report, execution plans or trace files, start and end the section with the tag {noformat}{noformat} (lowercase, curly brackets, no spaces) so that the text appears in fixed format.
"Science is more than a body of knowledge; it is a way of thinking"
Carl Sagan

Performance degradation encountered while running BOE in clustered set up

Problem Statement:
We have a clustered BOE set up in Production with 2 CMS servers (named boe01 and boe02) . Mantenix application (Standard J2EE application in a clustered set up) points to these BOE services hosted on virtual machines to generate reports. As soon as BOE services on both boe01 and boe02 are up and running , performance degradation is observed i.e (response times varies from 7sec to 30sec) .
The same set up works fine when BOE services on boe02 is turned off i.e only boe01 is up and running.No drastic variation is noticed.
BOE Details : SAP BusinessObjects environment XIR2 SP3 running on Windows 2003 Servers.(Virtual machines)
Possible Problem Areas as per our analysis
1) Node 2 Virtual Machine Issue:
This currently being part of the Production infrastructure, any problem assessment testing is not possible.
2) BOE Configuration Issue
Comparison report to check the build between BOE 01 and BOE 02 - Support team has confirmed no major installation differences apart from a minor Operating System setting difference.Question being is there some configuration/setting that we are missing ?
3) Possible BOE Cluster Issue:
Tests in staging environment ( with a similar clustered BOE setup ) have proved inconclusive.
We require your help in
- Root cause Analysis for this problem.
- Any troubleshooting action henceforth.
Another observation from our Weblogic support engineers for the above set up which may or may not be related to the problem is mentioned below.
When the services on BOE_2 are shutdown and we try to fetch a particular report from BOE_1 (Which is running), the following WARNING/ERROR comes up:-
07/09/2011 10:22:26 AM EST> <WARN> <com.crystaldecisions.celib.trace.d.if(Unknown Source)> - getUnmanagedService(): svc=BlockingReportSourceRepository,spec=aps<BOE_1> ,cluster:@BOE_OLTP, kind:cacheserver, name:<BOE_2>.cacheserver.cacheserver, queryString:null, m_replaceable:true,uri=osca:iiop://<BOE_1>;SI_SESSIONID=299466JqxiPSPUTef8huXO
com.crystaldecisions.thirdparty.org.omg.CORBA.TRANSIENT: attempt to establish connection failed: java.net.ConnectException: Connection timed out: connect minor code: 0x4f4f0001 completed: No
     at com.crystaldecisions.thirdparty.com.ooc.OCI.IIOP.Connector_impl.connect(Connector_impl.java:150)
     at com.crystaldecisions.thirdparty.com.ooc.OB.GIOPClient.createTransport(GIOPClient.java:233)
     at com.crystaldecisions.thirdparty.com.ooc.OB.GIOPClientWorkersPool.next(GIOPClientWorkersPool.java:122)
     at com.crystaldecisions.thirdparty.com.ooc.OB.GIOPClient.getWorker(GIOPClient.java:105)
     at com.crystaldecisions.thirdparty.com.ooc.OB.GIOPClient.startDowncall(GIOPClient.java:409)
     at com.crystaldecisions.thirdparty.com.ooc.OB.Downcall.preMarshalBase(Downcall.java:181)
     at com.crystaldecisions.thirdparty.com.ooc.OB.Downcall.preMarshal(Downcall.java:298)
     at com.crystaldecisions.thirdparty.com.ooc.OB.DowncallStub.preMarshal(DowncallStub.java:250)
     at com.crystaldecisions.thirdparty.com.ooc.OB.DowncallStub.setupRequest(DowncallStub.java:530)
     at com.crystaldecisions.thirdparty.com.ooc.CORBA.Delegate.request(Delegate.java:556)
     at com.crystaldecisions.thirdparty.org.omg.CORBA.portable.ObjectImpl._request(ObjectImpl.java:118)
     at com.crystaldecisions.enterprise.ocaframework.idl.ImplServ._OSCAFactoryStub.getServices(_OSCAFactoryStub.java:806)
     at com.crystaldecisions.enterprise.ocaframework.ServiceMgr.do(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.enterprise.ocaframework.ServiceMgr.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.enterprise.ocaframework.ServiceMgr.getUnmanagedService(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.enterprise.ocaframework.AbstractStubHelper.getService(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.enterprise.ocaframework.e.do(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.enterprise.ocaframework.o.try(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.enterprise.ocaframework.o.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.enterprise.ocaframework.o.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.enterprise.ocaframework.p.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.enterprise.ocaframework.ServiceMgr.getManagedService(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.sdk.occa.managedreports.ps.internal.a$a.getService(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.enterprise.ocaframework.e.do(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.enterprise.ocaframework.o.try(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.enterprise.ocaframework.o.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.enterprise.ocaframework.o.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.enterprise.ocaframework.p.a(Unknown Source)
We see the above warning coming 2 or 3 times before the request is processed and then we see the report. We have checked our config's for the cluster but didn't find anything concrete.
Is this a normal behavior of the software or can we optimize it?
Any assistance that you can provide would be great

Rahul,
I have exactly the same problem running BO 3.1 SP3 in a 2 machine cluster on AIX. Exact same full install on both machines. When I take down one of the machines the performance is much better.
An example of the problem now is that when i run the command ./ccm.sh -display -username administrator -password xxx on the either box when they are both up and running, I sometimes receive a timeout error (over 15mins)
If I run SQLplus direct on the boxes to the CMS DB then the response is instant. Tnspings of course shows no problems
When I bring down one of the machines and run the command ./ccm.sh -display again then this brings back results in less than a minute...
I am baffled as to the problem so was wondering if you found anything from your end
Cheers
Chris

Performance Degradation of new Servers

Hi All,
We are experiencing massive performance degradation on production when the system is under heavy use. It seems to be at its worst around month end. The worst effected transactions are the Cost / Profit centre 'line item' reports using RCOPCA02 (and other similar programs).
We have the message server running on the database instance as well as 2x App servers. The Msg Srv and One of the App servers are very similar builds
4x AMD Opteron 875
16gb RAM (10gb Pagefile)
Both running Win Server 2003
We're using MS SQL 2000
The other message server is a bit weaker but has been around for some time (few years) and hasn't caused any issues.
We have recently moved the Msg Server from an old (much weaker) server to the new build and since then seem to have performance issues. Initially after the move we had issues with the number of Page Table Entries (where down at about 6000-8000). Using the /3GB /USERVA=2900 switches we have this up to about 49,000.
If anyone has had a similar experience or could offer some assistance it would be much appreciated!!!
Cheers,
Kye

While investigating a different issue we've found that we have 3 servers that share the same set of disks on the SAN. Two of these where Message Servers (R/3 and BW) when both of these where running the 'Average disk queue Length' was at times reaching 400! (should be around 1-3).
We've moved one of these instances back to DR which has relieved some of the pressure from the disks.
We have also added another index to the GLPCA table (which was causing most of the problems).

How to add a new selection criteria in a report painter

Hi
I would like to know how to add a selection criteria in a report painter. I believe in Gen data we can add our selection criteria but my there is no option to select company code in that. Can anyone help me in this
Thanks in advance
Sankar

hi sankar,
When u click on the Gen. Data Selection on the right side of the screen you can see the Available Characteristics.
On the same side u can see with the 3 colors blue, yellow and white....
Click on the that , in that screen click on the Administrator option.
There in that screen UNCHECK the company code.
Click on the ACTIVATE and CLOSE it.....
Again SAVE the table settings.... then you can find the Company code..
Hope this will helps u out...
Ranjit Kumar

Problem in Exporting a Report Group having a Report Painter Report.

I am having a problem in exporting a Report group having a Report Painter report.When I am trying to export the Report Group using transaction GR57 with all dependent objects,it is displaying:
       group 0102CPDNUEA-CCROSI not transported.
       Transport groups separately if necessary.
There are 6 such groups which are not transported.Can anybody help me in this regards.Can anybody help me in exporting these Groups.Specifically in Report painter reports what do these Groups signify and how can we see them.Please help me....

hi,
I am able to export my report groups with dependent objects successfully.
I dont know why you are getting error message. Just keep break point at ***** and execute it for single group and find out why it is giving error.
IF SY-BATCH = 'X' OR NO_LIST = 'X'. "direct or batch
    SET PF-STATUS 'LIST'.
*****PERFORM TRANSPORT_OBJS USING 'X'. "transport all jobs
    IF FILE_EXP <> 'X'.
      READ TABLE WT_E071 INDEX 1.
      IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
        LEAVE.
      ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
ELSE.                                "online
    SET PF-STATUS 'MENU'.
   PERFORM WRITE_TRANSP_OBJS.
ENDIF.
regards,
ram

Performance degradation whit FAGLFLEXA in Report Painter

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for