Performance Improvement Documentation for FCP on Mac Pro

I'm interested in any documentation on how to improve the performance of my Mac Pro (8 core early 2009) for video editing. I'm working primarily with FCP and Motion. Any links or documentation you can recommend for improving speed or performance?
Thanks!
lance

You haven't told us about the type of footage that you are working with, nor the spec of your current Mac Pro.
That said, FCP can currently only address 1 processor core and 2.5GB of RAM.
You should certainly have your footage on a separate drive and not on the system drive, where the Mac OS and applications reside. Whether or not a RAID setup would be beneficial depends on the format that you work with -if it is mostly DV, there will be little to no benefit.
While the graphic card does play a role in FCP it really comes into its own with Motion and most here would agree that the ATI HD 4870 is the way to go at the moment. Motion is multi-processor aware and likes lots and lots of RAM. My 2008 machine has the graphic card mentioned above and 16GB of RAM, which is more or less the sweet spot for the stuff that I do.
You can speed up Compressor with a simple trick shown here: http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/speedingupcompressor.html
There's a wealth of FCP related info here: http://www.kenstone.net/fcphomepage/fcp_homepageindex.html
Join your local FCP User Group or check out this site: http://www.lafcpug.org/
Also:
http://www.secondchairvideo.com/
http://lfhd.net/
http://www.thrillcateditorial.com/
http://web.me.com/michaelgrenadier/revised_website/PostproductionConsultant.html
http://www.fcpbook.com/
http://www.amazon.com/How-Cheat-Motion-Patrick-Sheffield/dp/024081097X

Similar Messages

  • Upgrading my FCP X Mac Pro

    Upgrading my FCP X Mac Pro
    by Michael Holmes on Jul 24, 2012 at 11:18:08 pm
    I shoot videos of local bands as a hobby. I have been mixing/mastering songs for these bands for 15 years, so this is a natural extension.
    I would like to upgrade my 2010 Mac Pro 2x2.4 Quad Core. This computer is only for (1) FCP X and (2) Pro Tools HD Native. Currently my system works well on single cam editing as long as I don’t use a 3rd party plug-in…………then it drops frames big time. I am about to start using two FS100 camcorders, and I am worried that the Mac Pro won’t handle dual cam editing very well. I edit 100% in ProRes.
    Are the following decisions good ones?
    (1)     A Crucial M4 256 SSD for OS/Apps. I plan to buy, this seems like an obvious upgrade. I only have 75GB on the OS/Apps HD, so 256 should be sufficient.
    (2)     A RAID card. I don’t plan to buy this. I am not even using software RAID. Only one of the other three 2TB Hitachi 7200RPM SATA II drives is dedicated to video files; the other two handle Pro Tools files, and backup duties. I don’t currently have room for a RAID card, since the four PCIe slots are/will be used:
    (a)     ATI Radeon 5770
    (b)     Pro Tools HD Native
    (c)     Card for external monitor (maybe)
    (d)     Card for LTO 6 tape storage (planned, as soon as LTO 6 is available).
    (3)     An upgrade of the ATI Radeon 5770 graphics card.  I don’t plan to buy this. I haven’t seen anybody saying this will give me substantial FCP X performance improvement.
    (4) Increase memory. I will do this if it will help. I have 16GB, and I can go up to 32GB.
    (5)     An Eizo ColorEdge CG275W LCD Monitor. I don’t know what to do on this. I am currently using an HP 2711x monitor that I calibrate with a Spyder4PRO. I deliver H.264 QuickTime movies that are viewed on computer monitors. Probably 30% are uploaded to the Internet. Often the QT movies are given to club owners when bands try to get bookings.
    However, I will probably start to deliver HD video DVD’s soon, especially for the club owners. These will be better quality and increase the odds that the club owners will actually view them. So, right now the product is viewed 100% on computer monitors, but later this year it will start to be viewed on televisions.
    BTW, I have no idea what card to buy for this monitor, if I get it.
    Are these the right decisions?
    Note that I am doing very little to address the “dropping frames” issue, which is the biggie. Am I overlooking something obvious?
    Thanks!

    What about just getting two SSD's for the drive bays:
    (1) One 256GB SSD for OS/Apps
    (2) One 512GB SSD for Event/Project folders.
    512GB would be tight on some shoots, but I could even go to a Mercury Electra 960GB SSD.
    Yes, very pricey storage, but if this would solve data transfer problems, it would be worth it.
    If I only need one video card, I can use a PCIe slot for an external SATA drive unit (4 bays) I already have to handle all backup storage. So, the loss of the two HD bays to SSD would not be a big issue. HD bays are less dear than PCIe slots.

  • Fcpx poorly optimised for the new mac pro?

    'm experiencing low playback performance on fcpx 10.1.2 on my new mac pro:
    I'm on a 8-core, 64GB, d700 (project and files are all on the main drive. Im on the latest maverick update.
    Im working on prores 1080p and adding some effects to a clip and my playback really drops, so far I have been testing a few plugins such as hawaki "auto-split" or coremelts "track & slice X". I instantly need to render the effects to see the results, the funny thing is the same plugins runs smoothly on my macbook retina.. It made me wonder maybe the 3rd party plugin isn't optimised for the new mac pro but then I tried hawaki auto-split on Premiere cc 2014 and I was getting way better results than fcpx..
    This may seem like a trival thing but paying this much money for a product and having a bigger project with different plugins this gets really annoying..
    Anyone else experiencing any issues?

    QX 10 is QuarkXpress  (version 10 - latest version) – a pro publishing/page layout application. Adobe InDesign knocked QX off its throne over a decade ago. Now that Adobe have introduced their subscription model (as opposed to their former purchase upfront model), many pros like me are now looking for alternatives. QX is about the most likely. I'm just doing some homework before I jump (after all it's my livelihood we're talking about here).

  • I'm in the market for the new Mac Pro.

    I'm in the market for the new Mac Pro. I've been waiting for it to be released and have some cash set aside for this. I am a video editor and use Premiere Pro CC, and After Effects. My primary content is simple documentary films - so nothing too intense, but always HD (1080) video. I don't see 4k in my future but it's always a possibility so I want to future-proof my purchase for the next 3 years or so. With respect to storage space and RAM, I can make that decision myself based mostly on cashflow (since they are likely both user-expandable). However, with the basic configuration of the number of cores and video graphics card, I could use some advice. I think they are both set for the life of the computer, so important to get it right.
    My current thinking is to start with the 6 core model (I guess I have no real reason for this decision, except that I feel like the 4-core base model is put there to make the price feel lower, while the real advantages in performance start at the 6 core - am I way off on this one?). But, I wonder if I should spring for the 8 core or even the 12 core? Probably overkill for me - out of my budget anyway.
    The other decision is the graphics card - is the D500 enough? Will it be limiting factor in the future? Or should I move to D700?
    Here are the cost differences:
    from 6 core to 8 core is $1500
    from D500 to D700 is $600
    Which is worth it? (neither, both?)
    Thanks.

    Whether it's worth it depends more on you and what your current and future needs are.
    The good news is that Adobe's CC apps can already take advantage of the AMD FirePro GPU's in the Mac Pro, and offer hardware acceleration of the Mercury Playback Engine, which you'll see in Premiere, After Effects, and Media Encoder.  According to the Adobe staffers I've talked to, even the FirePro D300's will see a big benefit, in fact they say you won't see a big bump by upgrading the GPU.  As far as Adobe's apps are concerned, their OpenCL use is all single precision, and the D500/D700 upgrades put a lot of weight in double precision performance (which is unused in their apps).  Their recommendation - put the bulk of your budget on cores and RAM.
    How many depends on how elaborate and complex your work is.  Simple documentary films with the odd effects, transitions, titles, and grading.. you'd be fine with a 6-core IMO.  If you're leaning towards getting into really layered comps and effects, you'd shorten those long render times down a lot with the 8-core.  As for memory, I'd recommend at least 4GB per physical core.
    Good luck!

  • I have an imac bought late 2013, can i use it as a display for the new mac pro? I also want to use windows 8 on it, would this work with parallels or bootcamp?

    I have an imac bought late 2013, can i use it as a display for the new mac pro? I also want to use windows 8 on it, would this work with parallels or bootcamp?

    Yes, it supports target display mode. Windows can be run with either Parallels or Boot Camp.

  • Ati radeon hd 4870 for 1st generation mac pros?

    unfortunately the ati radeon hd 4870 is working for all mac pros except the first generation: http://store.apple.com/us/product/MB999ZM/A?fnode=MTY1NDA5OQ&mco=NDE4NDMxOA
    are there any other graphics cards that have a mini displayport connector and are compatible with a mac pro first generation?
    thanks for the help!

    The information on the AMD/ATI site actually says the 4870 has lower power requirements than the 3870.
    The PCIe power limit of 300W is the same for the 2008 Mac Pros as the 2007 8-core Clovertown Mac Pro. Power is not an issue. EFI appears not to be an issue either as Rob's tests have shown.
    Can anyone give a logical or technical reason why the 4870 is not being made available to 1st Gen Mac Pros like the 3.0 GHz 8-core. I can't think of anything.
    Surely Apple aren't restricting this cards use in an effort to persuade users to upgrade? Are they?

  • I'm shopping for the Apple Mac Pro

    I'm shopping for the Apple Mac Pro Desktop 2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Quad, 3GB RAM
    Mfr. Part # MB871LL/A
    When I put that in the Apple website, (just MB871LL/A ) or Google on the Web, it shows results)
    which on the Web is :
    2300$ at PC connection, J&R and Amazon
    While looking for a better price I found one
    for much much cheaper (+/- $500 less)
    Desktop Computers » APMP266QC3 » Apple Mac Pro Desktop Computer Workstation (Early 2009)
    (I don't know why they call it a workstation ?)
    They say all our products are new, not refurbished
    It's the same as the one seen on J&R, Amazon, etc. but what bothers me is that the Mfr# is different. [APMP266QC3] when everywhere else, including Apple store, it is MB871LL/A
    I'm wondering if there's something fishy here ?

    First a clarification: After reading the May 2009 issue of MacWorld (pg 50) I decided to buy the Apple Mac Pro Desktop 2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Quad, 3GB
    I find out that this model is known as Mfr. Part # MB871LL/A
    So if I see a Mfr#Z0G8-0002 (see below) I'm wondering what it is.
    The store that I'm talking is not B&H, it's on the other side of the country. They sell a 3GB and a 6 GB.
    they sell a 3GB computer with # [APMP266QC3] which seems now to be a B&H stock # (No information on Mfr#)
    They have also a 6GB and it has the APMP266QC6GB and
    Mfr#Z0G8-0002 also with $500 less than anywhere else.
    Both these number can be seen in B&H
    And that's my question: Mfr#Z0G8-0002 ? (not sure what is 0002)
    A completely different number just because 6GB instead of 3GB and everything else is the same ? That would be stupid. Usually it would just have one digit different at the end.
    When I put that number in the Apple page it said no result found. (but that could be because they stop selling it ?) If you google it will show results.
    I google both ZOG8-3GB and Z0G8-6GB
    http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=Z0G8-6GB)&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=safari&rls=en&q=Z0G8-3GB%29&btnG=Searc h
    or
    http://www.epinions.com/MacDesktops--price_range_20006000
    The first one compare to the 4th one. Ignore the stores. I'm not buying from them. I just want to show both computer on the same page.
    Again, they have a different manuf. number. Is it just because it's 6GB instead of 3GB ?
    So a store in the West, with no affiliation that I know with B&H in New York, sells a computer with a BH stock number ?
    I know the saying of "if it's too good.."
    I checked with the BBB there's no complaints about this company.

  • What kind of power regulator will you recommend for an vintage Mac Pro tower with 2 displays?

    What kind of power regulator will you recommend for an vintage Mac Pro tower with 2 displays?

    Cyberpower 1500VA UPS ~$200

  • External storage for early 08 mac pro for video storage and editing

    Early 08 Mac Pro mod 3.1, 2x Intel 2.8 Quad Core Processors. Bus speed 1.6 Ghz.  10 GB DDR2 FB-Dimm 800 MHz. USB2, Firewire 400, 800. ATI Radeon HD 2600 PCIe 256 mbVRAM.  Currently running OS 10.6.8.
    I use machine for photo and video storage and editing. I tried using 2x 3TB and 2x1TB HDD internally ( 8 TB total).  All are Seagate Barracuda SATA 7200.  Experienced constant spinning wheel and lockup requiring manual shutdown.  I had upgraded to Lion and to Maverick.  Did not help so I did a clean install of primary with  Snow Leopard and did not install past 10.6.8.  Works now if I don’t exceed 3.5 TB internally.  I also discovered that my Disk Permissions experienced voluminous corruption that could not be repaired if I installed  Java for Mac OS 10.6 Update 17 as suggested each time I check for software updates.
    I need to be able to have a total of about six TBs available in my system for storage and editing of video via Imovie. I don’t know the maximum of HDD storage that can be used in the four internal bays without causing lockup and corruption. If 3.5 TB is about the max, then I would like to have some ability to have external storage via firewire 800 if that would facility fast enough transfer for either video edition and or playback. I don’t know if thunderbolt can be installed via PCI card. I could add a SATA PCI card.  However, I assume that would cause the same problem as experienced with 8 TBs installed internally in the four bays.
    I would appreciate any suggestions.

    olderguy1 wrote:
    Do you mean 2x2TB and 2x3TB for a total internal capacity of 10TBs?  Are you running Snow Leopard or something else? Actually, I took it to an authorized repair facility who ran checks and said nothing is wrong with the hardware.
    Yes, I've got a total of to TB and I'm running Snow Leopard.  If your hardware checks out, that pretty much makes it a software problem,,,  reinstall the OS?
    Does the High Point Technologies SATA3 PCIe connect to eternal drive enclosures or does it somehow connect to drives in some of your four internal bays?
    Highpoint makes several RocketRAID 2700 series SATA3 controllers for Mac with external mini-SAS connectors, probably the cleanest/least expensive external hook-up. They also offer a combo internal/external board that (for marketing reasons) is listed as not working for internals with Mac Pro.  I believe that this is due to pressure from Apple (who apparently does some business with High Point Tech) but to the best of my knowledge it will. Technically, the "not supported" statement is true since all the internal bays are tied to the motherboard SATA 2 controller, but this can be remedied with a special cable.  HOWEVER... the boards are not bootable, so your system disk needs to be on the motherboard controller.
    In truth, I bought one of their 8-port "internal only" boards designated for PC only and flashed it so the Mac Pro sees it as a 2722 board, so I have 8 internal ports.  I'm not recommending you do the same unless you're pretty geeky, but the 2721 would give you half-and-half or the 2722 would give you 8 external with no mods to the board.

  • I have an imac bought late 2013, can i use it as a display for the new mac pro running windows 8 through bootcamp?

    I have an imac bought late 2013, can i use it as a display for the new mac pro running windows 8 through bootcamp?

    No. Target Display mode is only supported when connected to a Mac running 10.6 or later.
    It cannot be used with a PC, bootcamp, gamaing console, cable box, DVR or PowerPC Mac.
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ht3924

  • 2nd Optical-Drive for Early 2008 Mac Pro: Suggestions Required

    I am hoping to add a second optical-drive to my Early 2008 Mac Pro.  I notice that there are various SATA ones available for Early 2009 Mac Pro's onwards (e.g. the LG GH24NS90) but according to OWC (Other World Computing) these ones are apparently unsuitable for earlier Mac Pro's.
    The current optical-drive in my Mac Pro is a Sony AD-7170A.
    Can anyone suggest a suitable optical-drive that is still available as new (preferably available in the UK).
    Thanks,
    Yan Lee

    The SATA optical drives will work fine in a 2008 Mac Pro. I just installed this model:
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16827136259
    I already have a Blu-Ray SATA drive in my other tray, so I've done this a couple of times now.
    You have to run a SATA data cable through to one of the two ports on the motherboard - it involves removing the first two drive trays and the front fan. The cable goes up behind the top left corner of the compartment, together with the black cables feeding the optical ATA connectors. You CAN use an L-shaped (90 or 270 degree) SATA cable, but I've found that a regular straight cable works OK too - it is a tight fit behind the fan, but it should fit. The trouble with the L-shape is that it blocks the other SATA port. You can also look for low-profile SATA cables, which have slightly smaller heads.
    You'll also need a molex-to-SATA power adaptor. Don't forget to remove the front bezel from the drive - I do this by attaching everything to power, don't slide the optical enclosure back into the space yet, power up the computer, eject the drive using its eject button, and then slide the bezel up and off. You can then slide the enclosure into the space. Turn the computer off to put the fan and drives back in.
    Matt

  • Suggestion for Apple: MacBooks as terminals for the new Mac Pro

    Suggesting Apple to enable using MacBooks as terminals for the new Mac Pro if connecting through the thunderbolt.
    I am planning to get a new Mac Pro this month and use it as a 'portable' workstation since it weighs only 5kg.
    I am working on scienctific research which requires travels quite often.
    I want to have a workstation with me when I'm off-site so that I can work without worrying about the network connection.
    It would be great if I can use Macbook Air as a display, keyboard and touchpad for the Mac Pro.
    I will be fully geared by taking a Mac Pro and a MacBook Air with me where ever I travel.

    I don't know much about Thunderbold connections.
    Especially how does it combine PICe and DisplayPort signal together.
    I would like the MacBook serve as an external screen and an external PCIe video card to the Mac Pro, together with its touchpad and keyboard connected to the Mac Pro as an external USB keyboard and touchpad.
    In this case, one may not even boot into the OS on the MacBook side, just need proper drivers in the Mac Pro side for the 'external PCIe video card', keyboard and touchpad.

  • QX 10 – optimised for the new Mac Pro?

    I recently upgraded to a new Mac Pro.
    So am now considering going back to QX (I am a pro graphic designer).
    They have a deal offering special pricing for upgrades from version 3 (AUD $399)!
    Question: Is QX 10 optimized for the new Mac Pro?
    Any designers (having previously used / using InDesign) out there with QX 10 experience?
    Your thoughts please?

    QX 10 is QuarkXpress  (version 10 - latest version) – a pro publishing/page layout application. Adobe InDesign knocked QX off its throne over a decade ago. Now that Adobe have introduced their subscription model (as opposed to their former purchase upfront model), many pros like me are now looking for alternatives. QX is about the most likely. I'm just doing some homework before I jump (after all it's my livelihood we're talking about here).

  • Can RAM for the previous Mac Pros be used in the new revisions?

    I ordered a Mac Pro last month along with 2 4GB RAM kits from Crucial (see details below)
    4GB kit (2GBx2), 240-pin DIMM, DDR2 PC2-5300 memory module
    Module Size: 4GB kit (2GBx2)
    Package: 240-pin DIMM
    Feature: DDR2 PC2-5300
    Specs: DDR2 PC2-5300 • CL=5 • Fully Buffered • ECC • DDR2-667 • 1.8V • 256Meg x 72
    The RAM has arrived but the Mac Pro is yet to ship and today I received an email from Apple I can:
    1. Keep your original Mac Pro order at the same price.
    2. Cancel this order and place an order for the new Mac Pro.
    The RAM kits cost me £360 already so i hope i can use use the sticks in the new machine. Anyone know the answer to this? Before I decide what to do.
    Thanks...

    Memory page updated:
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=304235
    Crucial should be understanding, one of the best in customer support - and satisfaction. And most likely to have worked with Apple to have chips.
    DDR2 PC2-6400/DDRII-800
    This is NOT for Apple Mac Pro, just an "example."
    Corsair TWIN2XP2048-6400C4 $198 for 2 x 1GB
    http://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/ProductDetail.jsp?ProductCode=85025-21

  • Are the graphics cards offered  for the new mac pro HDCP  compliant??

    hi are the graphics cards offered for the new mac pro hdcp compliant??

    See if this helps
    http://macperformanceguide.com/index_topics.html#MacPro2013

Maybe you are looking for