Performance in Vendor Evaluation (ME61)

Hi, I configured a new subcriteria (Complaints) in the Quality criteria, and after my job of Vendor Evaluation decreased the performance.
Is there any procedure to increase the performance?
Regards,
Anna Pinheiro

Dear Sachin,
You can go to SPROMM-Purchasing-Vendor evaluationMaintain P.Organization data .
Then select the P.Org , then go to point score for automatic criteria.
You also can maintain the smoothing factor , min delv.var,etc, Just double click(go to detail) when you select the p.org.
The percentage score is define as per business req.
Regards,
w1n

Similar Messages

Vendor Evaluation process (with QM module not implemented)

Hi
Can I have more input on Vendor Evaluation process (with QM module not implemented) please ?

Hi,
Vendor evaluation can be automatic, manually or semi automatic. It is done on 4 criteria;
1.     Price
2.     Quantity
3.     Delivery
4.     Service
VE is done at p.org level, the Maximum no. of criteria that can be used are up to 99.
IT is done in 4 steps:-
1.     Define Weighing keys( equal weighing for all criteria or unequal weighing )
2.     Define criteria
3.     Define Scope of list
4.     Define Pur. Org data for vendor.
5.
SPROMMPURCHASING --- VENDOR EVALUATION
ME61 Maintain vendor evaluation (Put p.org and vendor)
Then ME65 Ranking list of vendor.
Regards,
Vivek

Perform VENDOR EVALUATION for MORE THAN ONE VENDORS at a time

Hello all,
Please guide for any process where i can perform Vendor Evaluation for MORE THAN ONE vendors AT A TIME.
At my location there are around thousand vendors, which are to be evaluated, and difficult to perform the evaluation process one-by-one.
(ME61/ME62/ME63)
Detailed replies with various possibilities would be highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Joy Ghosh

The vendor evaluation for some thousand vendors at the same time has already been in SAP long before they developed LSMW. The purpose of LSMW is to load data from a legacy system, of course you can (mis-)use it for a lot other things.
But you should not always use LSMW if you are to lazy to go thru the SAP standard menu to find a transaction like ME6G
There you define a job that runs RM06LBAT report.
You first have to define a selection variant for this report. this can be done in SE38 by entering the report name, select variant, clicking display, then entering a name for the variant and clicking Create.

Reg: Vendor Evaluation - Criteria "Delivery"

Hi Gurus,
I am in process of vendor evaluation in system. Confguration is maintained and I am opting for Automatic vendor evaluation and our interest is in Price and delivery. When I am doing Vendor evaluation in ME61,
I am getting the automatic values for Criteria "Delivery" and subcriteria "Price Level" "Price Behavior".
But incase of delivery I am not getting any values. I checked for settings in confirguration but not able to trace why the delivery vendor evaluation is not happening.
Pls advice on this.
Regards,
Venu

Hi
There are some settings like minimum delivery percentage which needs to be fulfilled for calculating score with respect to delivery performance.
Check the PDF from the link, it gives you more details on how score is been calculated for each criteria and customizing settings
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
Regards
Raja

Vendor Evaluation Configuration and steps?

Dear Gurus,
Pls explain me Vendor Evaluation Configuration and steps?

Hi,
Vendor evaluation is the process of analyzing and assessing the performance of the external vendors. In this processes vendors are allowed to score in different criteria and the highest points scored by vendor is selected for procurement.
Follow the bellow steps:
1. SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Define Weighting Keys
Select.Equal Weighting or Unequal Weighting
2. SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Define Criteria
Price,
Quality,
Delivery,
Service
For each criteria you will have Sub criteria
Criteria Sub-Criteria
Price, 1.Market Price,2. Price List
Quality, 1.Goods receipt,2.Quality Audit
Delivery 1.On time deliver,2. Confirmation, 3.Shipment Intructions
Service 1. Innovative, 2. Flexibility
3. SPRO->MM->Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation>Define Scope List.
4. SPRO->MM->Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Maintain Purchasing Organization Data
5. ME61
With above, you need to explore urself and read SAP help files.
Note: Follow the below link and check saphelp file
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
Regards,

Vendor Evaluation Process

Hi all,
I want to know the vendor Evalution process in SAP. Plesae povide any documentation for it.
Regards,
Kapil.

Hi,
Vendor evaluation is the process of analyzing and assessing the performance of the vendors of the external vendor. In this processes vendors are allowed to score in different criteria and the highest scored vendor is selected for procurement.
Follow the bellow steps:
1. SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Define Weighting Keys
Select.Equal Weighting or Unequal Weighting
2. SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Define Criteria
Price,
Quality,
Delivery,
Service
For each criteria you will have Sub criteria
Criteria Sub-Criteria
Price, 1.Market Price,2.Price Lsit
Quality, 1.Goods receipt,2.Quality Audit
Delivery 1.On time deliver,2. Confirmation,Shipment Intructions
Service 1.Inovative, 2. Flexibility
3.SPROMM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation-->Define Scope List.
4. SPROMM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation--> Maintain Purchasing Organization Data
5. ME61
For more check the links:
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/EN/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
Regards,
Biju K

Vendor Evaluation

Business Requires that for Vendor Evaluation, the scores to be at material level for the same vendor which means if they put the vendor number in the report parameter , the system will give them the vendor performance at material level .
Example :
Materials A and B were purchased 10 times from vendor 100001 so the system will give:
The on time delivery for Material A as 100 % ( if he did good performance )
The on time delivery for material B as 50% ( if he did bad performance ) ,they donu2019t want the system to give the on time delivery for both the material as 75% (100+50 )
The benefit of this is that SRS can find out another resources for the material with bad performance .
Any Thoughts on that?

Hi Tafanzas,
The Vendor Evaluation system actually collects data on material level and then accumulates it for display in e.g. trs ME65. The data are collected in LIS and you can run the analyses from there using trs ME6H.
BR
Raf

Tables for vendor evaluation data

Hai,
    I want to know the tables in which vendor evaluation data is being stored, and I need to get vendor evaluation data through my RFC, can u suggest me the procedure how I need to do it.
                             Thank you
                              Regards
                                Srinivas

Dear,
You ask a whole Vendor evaluation concept you need to read the help and do customizing depend on the requirement, then you evaluate the vendor using ME61 or ME6G.Almost all of your question need customizing setup first
below is the guide book :
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf

Vendor Evaluation in SAP

Hi SAP Experts,
We want to implement the vendor evaluation system for all material and service vendors in SAP. We have evaluated the standard functionality in SAP and most of the requirements are met if we use the standard system. But we are facing few major problems.
Firstly it is regarding the evaluation level. The purchasing team wants to do the evaluation for each purchase order raised for the vendor. As per my understanding, we can do the vendor evaluation at the most at the purchasing info record level. This might not be sufficient for us.
Secondly, we have a lot of cases of Service POs where we dont have info records since materials are not involved. I am not sure if the standard system would work in evaluating such cases at each PO level.
Appreciate your comments and suggestions.
Thanx & Regards,
Sateesh

Hi,
Evaluating the vendor at PO level meaning we want to evaluate the performance of the vendor for each PO / Service PO. We want a provision to enter the ratings for each criterion for each PO. e.g. Quality of material for PO 45_01 and PO 45_02 would be evaluated seperately. Then we would like to consolidate the data at the vendor level.
Hope this clarifies the doubt.
Regards,
Sateesh

Info Record with Vendor Evaluation

Hi gurus.
I'm activating Vendor valuation functionality at ECC6.0, so I have defined the following:
Main Criteria . 05-Services
Subcriteria 1- Quality Services with scoring method C
2-Services timeliness with scoring methos D
Both subcriteria are semi automatic, means is possible include any score via Info Record and after that run vendor evaluation via ME61.
When I try to update info record (Me12 ) via Extras->Vendor Evaluation, no subcriteria is showed for change. I just get Main criterion 05-Service. I think any customizing is missing..
please advice...
Best Regards.
JB

Hi Arminda.
Yes, they were set as you mentioned but the problem persist.
Best regards.
JB.

Vendor evaluation URGENT

While using the t- code ME61 for Vendor Evaluation I am getting an error that Purchasing organization data is incomplete Pls. Help me
regards

Hi
Vendor evaluations done at Purchase organization level.You have to define the control parameters at Purchase organization level.
Path for configuring the Vendor eveluation:
<b>SPRO> MM> Purchasing --> Vendor eveluation --> Define Purchase organization data for Vendor eveluation.</b>
Here you have to enter your purcvhase organization and define the control parameters like Best score,Applicability period etc.
If you want std configuration, please copy std Purchase org (1000) settings to your purchase organization by selecting copy as.
Regards
Ramakrishna

Is Quality management module required to be used for vendor evaluation?

Hi,
There is vendor evaluation functionality in MM. Is use of quality management module is mandatory for this? I wish to track the performance of vendor regarding quality (How much he has supplied, out of which how many are accepted and how many are rejected). Can I get this report without using QM?
Thanks in advance,
Satish

you can enter Quality results manually in vendor evealuation, so QM is not necessary for this, however with QM you can get the scores semi-automatic and automatically.

Vendor Evaluation in Background

Dear Gurus,
For vendor evaluation in Back ground, Do i need to maintain weight keys? then where can i see the output report once after running vendor evaluation in background.
Please advice
Thanks
RS

Dear,
Weighting Key is an identifier under which weighting factors for a number of main criteria can be grouped together and saved. If you know that you want to carry out an evaluation with certain main criteria and certain weighting factors, you can save this combination under a weighting key.
When you carry out the next vendor evaluation, just enter the relevant weighting key instead of entering a weighting factor for each individual criterion. The stardard two keys available are 01, 02.
If you do not have the weighting key, use the possible entries facility.
Next, in the background processing, usually evaluate vendors belonging to the same group (that is, vendors who have the weighting key). However, it is possible that you have selected an interval that contains different groups of vendors. For this reason, you may not enter a Weighting Key.
However the evaluation with weighting keys are preferred (basing on your organizations requirements and client performance, these may not be required). If you have enough time and interested to review the subject please have a look at: http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/EN/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf?bcsi_scan_DAD819A53026B58E=0&bcsi_scan_filename=MMISVE.pdf
Regards,
Syed Hussain.

Kindly suggest me regarding vendor evaluation (me63) score

Dear Friends,
I have excuted the report of vendor evaluation but here for Price criteria ( subcriteria) 40,40 are coming and some times it is 46,48 are coming. and for other criteria delivery it is 68,70 like that it is coming. kindly let me know how much is the maximum score for delivery,quality and price. and how it is distributed in standard when i have selected equal weightage
Regards,
Saurav

Dear Friend,
Kindly go through the below documents,
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J. Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following weighting shares for the standard main criteria: Main criterion Key 01 Key 02 Price 1 5 Quality 1 5 Delivery 1 2 Gen. service/support 1 1 Ext. service provision 1 2 Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or automatically. You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose. Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL. An example :- How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria "On-Time Delivery Performance"? The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order (Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances. You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as September 15. In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative effect on the score for this goods receipt. However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30) which the vendor will actually adhere to. The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these are the movement types 101 and 105. Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time, but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage in Customizing. Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in conjunction with quantity reliability. Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter. If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively low percentage variance: The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27; the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days. The system calculates the percentage variance as follows: 12 / 20 x 100 = 60 If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20% (12 / 60 x 100 = 20). If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm

Help...Vendor Evaluation Websurvey not showing

Dear All,
Im facing a problem in Vendor evaluation. I've done the following steps:
1. Create Questionnaire and assign it to Survey
2. Define Event for survey
3. Activate SRM_VE_SERVICE and UWS_FORM_SERVICE in SICF
When I create confirmation for PO, the survey page should appear automatically so I can fill the questionnaire. But it only show a blank page. Does anyone has ever experienced the same problem?
Rgds,
Aleluya.

Hi Aleluya ,
you nee to perform this config steps
1.To create surveys and questionnaires, make the necessary settings in Customizing for Supplier
Relationship Management (SRM) under SRM Server Integration with Other mySAP Components
Data Transfer to the SAP Business Information Warehouse Settings for Application-Specific DataSources (SRM)
Web Survey Cockpit for SRM Supplier Evaluation .
or you can use this tcode BBP_EVAL_SURVEY
2. To create a Web survey, choose Survey Create from the menu. The name and the identifier
can be chosen freely. The survey credentials are not used for calling up the questionnaire later on,
but are helpful for categorizing the different questionnaires.
3. After having saved a survey for the first time, you can add a new target group for mass data to its
target group hierarchy. No additional user information (e-mail, user) is needed here, because user
information is added to the questionnaire at runtime.
4. To create a questionnaire, choose the Questionnaire pushbutton.
Note
Thanks & Regards
Pradeep Kumar Dondeti

Performance in Vendor Evaluation (ME61)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for