Performance issue - BO Publisher 6.5

Post Author: fionas
CA Forum: Publishing
Hi,
We are using publisher 6.5 to burst customized BO reports to users in PDF format. We have five full client reports which are configured in five different publications. Each publication will send the customized report in PDF format and each publication will send more than 1000 reports at a time. We run all the five publications one by one using publisher (BA). So every time we burst more than 5000 reports using publisher 6.5. The publisher sends the first 600 to 700 reports quickly of each publication. After that the performance of publisher comes down and it takes very long time to send the remaining reports. So we need your advice on this.
Why the publisher performance comes down after sending some number of reports? How to improve the performance of the publisher? (As a work around we split each report into two, so that each report will send approx 500 reports and we run the publisher ten times (5 X 2) instead of running it only for five times. This requires extra effort)
BO Server Configuration
Operating System         : Windows 2003 standard edition SP1
BO                               : 6.5 SP2
Repository                    : SQL Server 2005
IIS                                : 6.0

Hi,
How is the database server operating system coping in terms of CPU load and memory? and what is the db data cache hit ratio in ST04?
I would look into the following things, network configuration between database and central instance, and the load on the DB server cpu load/memory and possibly the most important the DB2 memory and configuration instead of focusing on the SAP application server in case of high DB times.
Please be aware of the fact that tables in upgrade from 4.6C to ECC increase from about 30000 to 60-70000 and db tuning is the most likely explanation for your problems.
Regards
Sindri

Similar Messages

  • BW BCS cube(0bcs_vc10 ) Report huge performance issue

    Hi Masters,
    I am working out for a solution for BW report developed in 0bcs_vc10 virtual cube.
    Some of the querys is taking more 15 to 20 minutes to execute the report.
    This is huge performance issue. We are using BW 3.5, and report devloped in bex and published thru portal. Any one faced similar problem please advise how you tackle this issue. Please give the detail analysis approach how you resolved this issue.
    Current service pack we are using is
    SAP_BW 350 0016 SAPKW35016
    FINBASIS 300 0012 SAPK-30012INFINBASIS
    BI_CONT 353 0008 SAPKIBIFP8
    SEM-BW 400 0012 SAPKGS4012
    Best of Luck
    Chris
    BW BCS cube(0bcs_vc10 ) Report huge performance issue

    Ravi,
    I already did that, it is not helping me much for the performance. Reports are taking 15 t0 20 minutes. I wanted any body in this forum have the same issue how
    they resolved it.
    Regards,
    Chris

  • Performance Issues with Folio format in Ipad.

    Hello everyone! My FIRST post here!!!
    I work with educational games and I'm facing performance issues with games that I've made in HTML5 to play in Ipad. I tried to import them to the format folio in DPS (Adobe Digital Publishing Suite). However when I import the HTML game into Indesign and try to preview it in Adobe content viewer, the game doesn't open or works without perform properly (there is a lag that doesn't let you play the game with a little of fun).
    The games that I've created have a memory use max of 35mb and weighs 30mb max.
    Does anyone know what's happen and what I can do to fix that performance issue?
    Thanks a lot!

    Moved to DPS

  • Performance issue for this function-module(HR_TIM_REPORT_ABSENCE_DATA)

    Hi Friends
    I am having performance issue for this function-module(HR_TIM_REPORT_ABSENCE_DATA) and one my client got over 8 thousend employees . This function-module taking forever to read the data. is there any other function-module to read the absences data IT2001 .
    I did use like this .if i take out this F.M 'HR_TIM_REPORT_ABSENCE_DATA_INI' its not working other Function-module.please Suggest me .
    call function 'HR_TIM_REPORT_ABSENCE_DATA_INI'
    exporting "Publishing to global memory
    option_string = option_s "string of sel org fields
    trig_string = trig_s "string of req data
    alemp_flag = sw_alemp "all employee req
    infot_flag = space "split per IT neccessary
    sel_modus = sw_apa
    importing
    org_num = fdpos_lines "number of sel org fields
    tables
    fieldtab = fdtab "all org fields
    field_sel = fieldnametab_m. "sel org fields
    To Read all infotypes from Absences type.
    RP_READ_ALL_TIME_ITY PN-BEGDA PN-ENDDA.
    central function unit to provide internal tables: abse orgs empl
    call function 'HR_TIM_REPORT_ABSENCE_DATA'
    exporting
    pernr = pernr-pernr
    begda = pn-begda
    endda = pn-endda
    IMPORTING
    SUBRC = SUBRC_RTA
    tables
    absences = absences_01
    org_fields = orgs
    emp_fields = empl
    REFTAB =
    APLTAB =
    awart_sel_p = awart_s[]
    awart_sel_a = awart_s[]
    abstp_sel = abstp_s[]
    i0000 = p0000
    i0001 = p0001
    i0002 = p0002
    i0007 = p0007
    i2001 = p2001
    i2002 = p2002
    i2003 = p2003.
    Thanks & Regards
    Reddy

    guessing will not help you much, check with SE30 to get a better insight
    SE30
    The ABAP Runtime Trace (SE30) -  Quick and Easy
    what is the total time, what are the Top 10 in the hitlist.
    Siegfried

  • Performance Issue-;How to restrict the total output of the report.

    Hi Experts
    I need your advise to resolve one performance issue in my BI Publisher report.
    My report query is extracting more than 80000 records at once. To load these records into the report template it is taking all most 14 to 15 hours. Unfortunately i cannot change my logic to put some more filter to restrict the query output, as this is the requirement from the client.
    Is there any way i can restrict my report so that it will extract the first 1000 record and on the event of pressing next it will extract the next 1000 record and so on from the point when it left in last time.
    Kindly let me know if you have any solution for this.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Srikant

    Hi experts...
    Any update on this...

  • Performance issue with Crystal when upgrading Oracle to 11g

    Dear,
    I am facing performance issue in crystal report and oracle 11g as below:
    In ther report server, I have created a ODBC for connect to another Oracle 11g server. also in report server I have created and published a folder to content all of my crystal report. These report can connect to oracle 11g server via ODBC.
    and I have a tomcat server to run my application in my application I refer to report folder in report server.
    This way can work with SQL server and oracle 9 or 10g but it facing performance issue in oracle 11g.
    please let me know the root cause.
    Notes: report server, tomcate server are win 32bit, but oracle is in win 64bit, and i have upgraded DataDirect connect ODBC version 6.1 but the issue can not resolve.
    Please help me to solve it.
    Thanks so much,
    Anh

    Hi Anh,
    Use a third party ODBC test tool now. SQL Plus will be using the Native Oracle client so you can't compare performance.
    Download our old tool called SQLCON: https://smpdl.sap-ag.de/~sapidp/012002523100006252882008E/sqlcon32.zip
    Connect and then click on the SQL tab and paste in the SQL from the report and time that test.
    I believe the issue is because the Oracle client is 64 bit, you should install the 32 bit Oracle Client. If using the 64 bit client then the client must thunk ( convert 64 bit data to 32 bit data format ) which is going to take more time.
    If you can use OLE DB or using the Oracle Server driver ( native driver ) should be faster. ODBC puts another layer on top of the Oracle client so it too takes time to communicate between the layers.
    Thank you
    Don

  • SharePoint 2007 performance issue after upgrading the operating system

    We upgraded the operating system of our SharePoint Server 2007 from 2003 to 2008 R2. After upgrade we rebuilt the SharePoint using content DBs we backed up before upgrade. All settings is same except that we moved the DBs to new SQL servers. Now users are
    reporting performance issue with sites. I experienced it myself some of the pages takes 9-30 seconds to load. Also our SharePoint server is single server. I monitored the SharePoint Server and it is fine. I did fiddler trace and here are the result. I see
    lots of 401 (login failed) errors then 302 (redirect) then 200 (OK). Do you know why we are getting 401 errors?
    Result
    Protocol
    Host
    URL
    Body
    Caching
    Content-Type
    Process
    184
    401
    HTTP
    sp07.ourcompany.com
    /bif/EUROPE-AMA
    341
    text/html; charset=us-ascii
    iexplore:15344
    185
    302
    HTTP
    sp07.ourcompany.com
    /bif/EUROPE-AMA
    196
    text/html; charset=UTF-8
    iexplore:15344
    186
    401
    HTTP
    sp07.ourcompany.com
    /bif/EUROPE-AMA/default.aspx
    341
    text/html; charset=us-ascii
    iexplore:15344
    187
    200
    HTTP
    sp07.ourcompany.com
    /bif/EUROPE-AMA/default.aspx
    105,487
    private, max-age=0; Expires: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 21:37:48 GMT
    text/html; charset=utf-8
    iexplore:15344
    188
    401
    HTTP
    sp07.ourcompany.com
    /_layouts/1033/styles/calendar.css?rev=BrbrIU86qTG2EHx1ZUuFBQ%3D%3D
    341
    text/html; charset=us-ascii
    iexplore:15344
    189
    200
    HTTP
    sp07.ourcompany.com
    /_layouts/images/prevbuttonltr.gif
    76
    max-age=31536000
    image/gif
    iexplore:15344
    190
    200
    HTTP
    sp07.ourcompany.com
    /_layouts/images/nextbuttonltr.gif
    78
    max-age=31536000
    image/gif
    iexplore:15344
    191
    200
    HTTP
    sp07.ourcompany.com
    /_layouts/images/day.gif
    1,051
    max-age=31536000
    image/gif
    iexplore:15344
    192
    200
    HTTP
    sp07.ourcompany.com
    /_layouts/images/month.gif
    1,068
    max-age=31536000
    image/gif
    iexplore:15344
    193
    200
    HTTP
    sp07.ourcompany.com
    /_layouts/1033/styles/calendar.css?rev=BrbrIU86qTG2EHx1ZUuFBQ%3D%3D
    28,814
    max-age=31536000
    text/css
    iexplore:15344
    194
    200
    HTTP
    sp07.ourcompany.com
    /_layouts/images/week.gif
    1,057
    max-age=31536000
    image/gif
    iexplore:15344
    195
    200
    HTTP
    sp07.ourcompany.com
    /_layouts/images/weekbox.gif
    149
    max-age=31536000
    image/gif
    iexplore:15344
    196
    200
    HTTP
    sp07.ourcompany.com
    /_layouts/images/alldayDefault.gif
    157
    max-age=31536000
    image/gif
    iexplore:15344
    197
    200
    HTTP
    sp07.ourcompany.com
    /_layouts/images/calnumBttntoday.gif
    146
    max-age=31536000
    image/gif
    iexplore:15344
    198
    200
    HTTP
    sp07.ourcompany.com
    /_layouts/images/calnumBttn.gif
    95
    max-age=31536000
    image/gif
    iexplore:15344

    Hi
    when you request a  Site collection (http://domain/) or a Site (http://domain/foo/) of your Publishing Site you get redirected to the http://domain/Pages/<WelcomePage>.aspx. SharePoint 2007 uses the 302 header (location temporarily moved) for
    this purpose. Surprisingly even WSS uses the 302 header to redirect a root url to the default.aspx. In comparison ASP.NET uses an internal redirect to render the default page when the root url requested: there is no redirect in this situation.
    Check the link which can give more input
    http://blog.mastykarz.nl/sharepoint-2007-redirect-solved-using-301-instead-of-302-redirects/
    for error 401 you can check this link
    http://discussions.citrix.com/topic/97027-no-resources-401-unauthorized/d
    and check SharePoint ULS logs and event viewer for any exceptions.
    Please mark the Answer and Vote me if you think that it will help you to resolved your issue

  • WebLogic 10.3.4 Adminserver Performance Issues - Clustered Environment.

    I am running WL 10.3.4 64 bit version on 64 bit hardware (blade serves) running Solaris 10 and I have the servers setup in a cluster. There are 3 machines are part of the cluster.
    Managed Server1 is on Blade Server 1
    Managed Server2 is on Blade Server 2
    Managed Server3 is on Blade Server 3
    We have about 20 different clusters setup and 60 servers across those 20 clusters.
    The adminserver runs on a separate box (not a blade server). Tasks that do NOT involve the servers or deployments tabs are relatively fast however, when I go to the servers or deployments tab, and to some extent the clusters tab, the response is very slow.
    For example, I am running WL 10.3.0 on less robust hardware. I installed the patch that Oracle published to resolve this particular issue. We have a similar number of clusters and servers on in that environment (3 severs to a cluster). The servers tab responds in 10 seconds.
    In WL 10.3.4, the servers and deployments tabs take about 45 - 60 seconds to respond. This adds a LOT of overhead to doing any server or deployment related tasks.
    I realize that the admin server has to query all the managed servers but performance in 10.3.4 is much worse than WL 10.3.0 with the performance patch.
    Has anyone else run into similar performance issues with the WL 10.3.4 ADMIN Console running in a clustered environment? If so, does anyone have any suggestions to help improve performance.
    I also run a WL 10.3.4 instance in a single server environment and the servers and deployments tabs respond withing 10 seconds (very fast). It is just in a clustered environment.
    Regards,
    Mark

    hi Mark, it's a very interesting story, any follow-up? I would be curious to know the reason for the delay...

  • Avoiding performance issue due to loop within loop on internal tables

    Hi Experts,
                    I have a requirement where in i want to check whether each of the programs stored in one internal table are called from any of the programs stored in another internal table. In this case i am looping on two internal tables (Loop within a loop) which is causing a major performance issue. Program is running very very slow.
    Can any one advise how to resolve this performance issue so that program runs faster.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Chetan.

    Forget the parallel cursur stuff, it is much to complicated for general usage and helps nearly nothing. I will publish a blog in the next days where this is shown in detail.
    Loop on loop is no problem if the inner table is a hashed or sorted table.
    If it must be a standard table, then you must make a bit more effort and faciliate a binary search (read binary search / loop from index exit)
    see here the exact coding Measurements on internal tables: Reads and Loops:
    /people/siegfried.boes/blog/2007/09/12/runtimes-of-reads-and-loops-on-internal-tables
    And don't forget, the other table must not be sorted, the loop reaches anyway every line. The parallel cursor requires both tables to be sorted. The additional sort
    consumes nearly the whole advantage of the parallel cursor compared to the simple but good loop in loop solutions.
    Siegfried

  • SharePoint performance counters for publishing cache

    Hi,
    I add some performance counters for publishing cache to my Windows performance monitor. The total values are filled but for specific site's they stay empty. Any ideas?

    HI Hanny,
    Please check the below for configuration
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/rgullick/archive/2014/01/10/sharepoint-performance-monitoring.aspx
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/russmax/archive/2009/05/27/configuring-performance-monitor-log-for-sharepoint-performance-issues.aspx
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff758658.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
    Please remember to click 'Mark as Answer' on the answer if it helps you

  • Report Performance Issue - Activity

    Hi gurus,
    I'm developing an Activity report using Transactional database (Online real time object).
    the purpose of the report is to list down all contacts related activities and activities NOT related to Contact by activity owner (user id).
    In order to fullfill that requirment I've created 2 report
    1) All Activities related to Contact -- Report A
    pull in Acitivity ID , Activity Type, Status, Contact ID
    2) All Activities not related to Contact UNION All Activities related to Contact (Base report) -- Report B
    to get the list of activities not related to contact i'm using Advanced filter based on result of another request which is I think is the part that slow down the query.
    <Activity ID not equal to any Activity ID in Report B>
    Anyone encountered performance issue due to the advanced filter in analytic before?
    any input is really appriciated
    Thanks in advanced,
    Fina

    Fina,
    Union is always the last option. If you can get all record in one report, do not use union.
    since all records, which you are targeting, are in the activity subject area, it is not nessecery to combine reports. add a column with the following logic
    if contact id is null (or = 'Unspecified') then owner name else contact name
    Hopefully, this is helping.

  • Report performance Issue in BI Answers

    Hi All,
    We have a performance issues with reports. Report is running more than 10 mins. we took query from the session log and ran it in database, at that time it took not more than 2 mins. We have verified proper indexes on the where clause columns.
    Could any once suggest to improve the performance in BI answers?
    Thanks in advance,

    I hope you dont have many case statements and complex calculations that you do in the Answers.
    Next thing you need to monitor is how many rows of data that you are trying to retrieve from the query. If the volume is huge then it takes time to do the formatting on the Answers as you are going to dump huge volumes of data. Database(like teradata) returns initially like 1-2000 records if you hit show all records then even db is gonna fair amount of time if you are dumping many records
    hope it helps
    thanks
    Prash

  • Interested by performance issue ?  Read this !  If you can explain, you're a master Jedi !

    This is the question we will try to answer...
    What si the bottle neck (hardware) of Adobe Premiere Pro CS6
    I used PPBM5 as a benchmark testing template.
    All the data and log as been collected using performance counter
    First of all, describe my computer...
    Operating System
    Microsoft Windows 8 Pro 64-bit
    CPU
    Intel Xeon E5 2687W @ 3.10GHz
    Sandy Bridge-EP/EX 32nm Technology
    RAM
    Corsair Dominator Platinum 64.0 GB DDR3
    Motherboard
    EVGA Corporation Classified SR-X
    Graphics
    PNY Nvidia Quadro 6000
    EVGA Nvidia GTX 680   // Yes, I created bench stats for both card
    Hard Drives
    16.0GB Romex RAMDISK (RAID)
    556GB LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i SATA3 6GB/s 5 disks with Fastpath Chip Installed (RAID 0)
    I have other RAID installed, but not relevant for the present post...
    PSU
    Cosair 1000 Watts
    After many days of tests, I wanna share my results with community and comment them.
    CPU Introduction
    I tested my cpu and pushed it at maximum speed to understand where is the limit, can I reach this limit and I've logged precisely all result in graph (See pictures 1).
    Intro : I tested my E5-XEON 2687W (8 Cores Hyperthread - 16 threads) to know if programs can use the maximum of it.  I used Prime 95 to get the result.  // I know this seem to be ordinary, but you will understand soon...
    The result : Yes, I can get 100% of my CPU with 1 program using 20 threads in parallel.  The CPU gives everything it can !
    Comment : I put 3 IO (cpu, disk, ram) on the graph of my computer during the test...
    (picture 1)
    Disk Introduction
    I tested my disk and pushed it at maximum speed to understand where is the limit and I've logged precisely all result in graph (See pictures 2).
    Intro : I tested my RAID 0 556GB (LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i SATA3 6GB/s 5 disks with Fastpath Chip Installed) to know if I can reach the maximum % disk usage (0% idle Time)
    The result : As you can see in picture 2, yes, I can get the max of my drive at ~ 1.2 Gb/sec read/write steady !
    Comment : I put 3 IO (cpu, disk, ram) on the graph of my computer during the test to see the impact of transfering many Go of data during ~10 sec...
    (picture 2)
    Now, I know my limits !  It's time to enter deeper in the subject !
    PPBM5 (H.264) Result
    I rendered the sequence (H.264) using Adobe Media Encoder.
    The result :
    My CPU is not used at 100%, the turn around 50%
    My Disk is totally idle !
    All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
    The transfert rate seem to be a wave (up and down).  Probably caused by (Encrypt time....  write.... Encrypt time.... write...)  // It's ok, ~5Mb/sec during transfert rate !
    CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
    RAM, more than enough !  39 Go RAM free after the test !  // Excellent
    ~65 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Good, thread is the sign that program try to using many cores !)
    GPU Load on card seem to be a wave also ! (up and down)  ~40% usage of GPU during the process of encoding.
    GPU Ram get 1.2Go of RAM (But with GTX 680, no problem and Quadro 6000 with 6 GB RAM, no problem !)
    Comment/Question : CPU is free (50%), disks are free (99%), GPU is free (60%), RAM is free (62%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process.  Why ????  Is there some time delay in the encoding process ?
    Other : Quadro 6000 & GTX 680 gives the same result !
    (picture 3)
    PPBM5 (Disk Test) Result (RAID LSI)
    I rendered the sequence (Disk Test) using Adobe Media Encoder on my RAID 0 LSI disk.
    The result :
    My CPU is not used at 100%
    My Disk wave and wave again, but far far from the limit !
    All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
    The transfert rate wave and wave again (up and down).  Probably caused by (Buffering time....  write.... Buffering time.... write...)  // It's ok, ~375Mb/sec peak during transfert rate !  Easy !
    CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
    RAM, more than enough !  40.5 Go RAM free after the test !  // Excellent
    ~48 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Good, thread is the sign that program try to using many cores !)
    GPU Load on card = 0 (This kind of encoding is GPU irrelevant)
    GPU Ram get 400Mb of RAM (No usage for encoding)
    Comment/Question : CPU is free (65%), disks are free (60%), GPU is free (100%), RAM is free (63%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process.  Why ????  Is there some time delay in the encoding process ?
    (picture 4)
    PPBM5 (Disk Test) Result (Direct in RAMDrive)
    I rendered the same sequence (Disk Test) using Adobe Media Encoder directly in my RamDrive
    Comment/Question : Look at the transfert rate under (picture 5).  It's exactly the same speed than with my RAID 0 LSI controller.  Impossible !  Look in the same picture the transfert rate I can reach with the ramdrive (> 3.0 Gb/sec steady) and I don't go under 30% of disk usage.  CPU is idle (70%), Disk is idle (100%), GPU is idle (100%) and RAM is free (63%).  // This kind of results let me REALLY confused.  It's smell bug and big problem with hardware and IO usage in CS6 !
    (picture 5)
    PPBM5 (MPEG-DVD) Result
    I rendered the sequence (MPEG-DVD) using Adobe Media Encoder.
    The result :
    My CPU is not used at 100%
    My Disk is totally idle !
    All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
    The transfert rate wave and wave again (up and down).  Probably caused by (Encoding time....  write.... Encoding time.... write...)  // It's ok, ~2Mb/sec during transfert rate !  Real Joke !
    CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
    RAM, more than enough !  40 Go RAM free after the test !  // Excellent
    ~80 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Lot of thread, but it's ok in multi-thread apps!)
    GPU Load on card = 100 (This use the maximum of my GPU)
    GPU Ram get 1Gb of RAM
    Comment/Question : CPU is free (70%), disks are free (98%), GPU is loaded (MAX), RAM is free (63%), my computer is pushed at limit during the encoding process for GPU only.  Now, for this kind of encoding, the speed limit is affected by the slower IO (Video Card GPU)
    Other : Quadro 6000 is slower than GTX 680 for this kind of encoding (~20 s slower than GTX).
    (picture 6)
    Encoding single clip FULL HD AVCHD to H.264 Result (Premiere Pro CS6)
    You can look the result in the picture.
    Comment/Question : CPU is free (55%), disks are free (99%), GPU is free (90%), RAM is free (65%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process.  Why ????   Adobe Premiere seem to have some bug with thread management.  My hardware is idle !  I understand AVCHD can be very difficult to decode, but where is the waste ?  My computer want, but the software not !
    (picture 7)
    Render composition using 3D Raytracer in After Effects CS6
    You can look the result in the picture.
    Comment : GPU seems to be the bottle neck when using After Effects.  CPU is free (99%), Disks are free (98%), Memory is free (60%) and it depend of the setting and type of project.
    Other : Quadro 6000 & GTX 680 gives the same result in time for rendering the composition.
    (picture 8)
    Conclusion
    There is nothing you can do (I thing) with CS6 to get better performance actually.  GTX 680 is the best (Consumer grade card) and the Quadro 6000 is the best (Profressional card).  Both of card give really similar result (I will probably return my GTX 680 since I not really get any better performance).  I not used Tesla card with my Quadro, but actually, both, Premiere Pro & After Effects doesn't use multi GPU.  I tried to used both card together (GTX & Quadro), but After Effects gives priority to the slower card (In this case, the GTX 680)
    Premiere Pro, I'm speechless !  Premiere Pro is not able to get max performance of my computer.  Not just 10% or 20%, but average 60%.  I'm a programmor, multi-threadling apps are difficult to manage and I can understand Adobe's programmor.  But actually, if anybody have comment about this post, tricks or any kind of solution, you can comment this post.  It's seem to be a bug...
    Thank you.

    Patrick,
    I can't explain everything, but let me give you some background as I understand it.
    The first issue is that CS6 has a far less efficient internal buffering or caching system than CS5/5.5. That is why the MPEG encoding in CS6 is roughly 2-3 times slower than the same test with CS5. There is some 'under-the-hood' processing going on that causes this significant performance loss.
    The second issue is that AME does not handle regular memory and inter-process memory very well. I have described this here: Latest News
    As to your test results, there are some other noteworthy things to mention. 3D Ray tracing in AE is not very good in using all CUDA cores. In fact it is lousy, it only uses very few cores and the threading is pretty bad and does not use the video card's capabilities effectively. Whether that is a driver issue with nVidia or an Adobe issue, I don't know, but whichever way you turn it, the end result is disappointing.
    The overhead AME carries in our tests is something we are looking into and the next test will only use direct export and no longer the AME queue, to avoid some of the problems you saw. That entails other problems for us, since we lose the capability to check encoding logs, but a solution is in the works.
    You see very low GPU usage during the H.264 test, since there are only very few accelerated parts in the timeline, in contrast to the MPEG2-DVD test, where there is rescaling going on and that is CUDA accelerated. The disk I/O test suffers from the problems mentioned above and is the reason that my own Disk I/O results are only 33 seconds with the current test, but when I extend the duration of that timeline to 3 hours, the direct export method gives me 22 seconds, although the amount of data to be written, 37,092 MB has increased threefold. An effective write speed of 1,686 MB/s.
    There are a number of performance issues with CS6 that Adobe is aware of, but whether they can be solved and in what time, I haven't the faintest idea.
    Just my $ 0.02

  • Performance Issue for BI system

    Hello,
    We are facing performance issues for BI System. Its a preproductive system and its performance is degrading badly everyday. I was checking system came to know program buffer hit ratio is increaasing everyday due to high Swaps. So asked to change the parameter abap/buffersize which was 300Mb to 500Mb. But still no major improvement is found in the system.
    There is 16GB Ram available and Server is HP-UX and with Netweaver2004s with Oracle 10.2.0.4.0 installed in it.
    The Main problem is while running a report or creating a query is taking way too long time.
    Kindly help me.

    Hello SIva,
    Thanks for your reply but i have checked ST02 and ST03 and also SM50 and its normal
    we are having 9 dialog processes, 3 Background , 2 Update and 1 spool.
    No one is using the system currently but in ST02 i can see the swaps are in red.
    Buffer                 HitRatio   % Alloc. KB  Freesp. KB   % Free Sp.   Dir. Size  FreeDirEnt   % Free Dir    Swaps    DB Accs
    Nametab (NTAB)                                                                                0
       Table definition     99,60     6.798                                                   20.000                                            29.532    153.221
       Field definition     99,82      31.562        784                 2,61           20.000      6.222          31,11          17.246     41.248
       Short NTAB           99,94     3.625      2.446                81,53          5.000        2.801          56,02             0            2.254
       Initial records      73,95        6.625        998                 16,63          5.000        690             13,80             40.069     49.528
                                                                                    0
    boldprogram                97,66     300.000     1.074                 0,38           75.000     67.177        89,57           219.665    725.703bold
    CUA                    99,75         3.000        875                   36,29          1.500      1.401          93,40            55.277      2.497
    Screen                 99,80         4.297      1.365                 33,35          2.000      1.811          90,55              119         3.214
    Calendar              100,00       488            361                  75,52            200         42              21,00               0            158
    OTR                   100,00         4.096      3.313                  100,00        2.000      2.000          100,00              0
                                                                                    0
    Tables                                                                                0
       Generic Key          99,17    29.297      1.450                  5,23           5.000        350             7,00             2.219      3.085.633
       Single record        99,43    10.000      1.907                  19,41           500         344            68,80              39          467.978
                                                                                    0
    Export/import          82,75     4.096         43                      1,30            2.000        662          33,10            137.208
    Exp./ Imp. SHM         89,83     4.096        438                    13,22         2.000      1.482          74,10               0    
    SAP Memory      Curr.Use %    CurUse[KB]    MaxUse[KB]    In Mem[KB]    OnDisk[KB]    SAPCurCach      HitRatio %
    Roll area               2,22                5.832               22.856             131.072     131.072                   IDs           96,61
    Page area              1,08              2.832                24.144               65.536    196.608              Statement     79,00
    Extended memory     22,90       958.464           1.929.216          4.186.112          0                                         0,00
    Heap memory                                    0                  0                    1.473.767          0                                         0,00
    Call Stati             HitRatio %     ABAP/4 Req      ABAP Fails     DBTotCalls         AvTime[ms]      DBRowsAff.
      Select single     88,59               63.073.369        5.817.659      4.322.263             0                         57.255.710
      Select               72,68               284.080.387          0               13.718.442             0                        32.199.124
      Insert                 0,00                  151.955             5.458             166.159               0                           323.725
      Update               0,00                    378.161           97.884           395.814               0                            486.880
      Delete                 0,00                    389.398          332.619          415.562              0                             244.495
    Edited by: Srikanth Sunkara on May 12, 2011 11:50 AM

  • RE: Case 59063: performance issues w/ C TLIB and Forte3M

    Hi James,
    Could you give me a call, I am at my desk.
    I had meetings all day and couldn't respond to your calls earlier.
    -----Original Message-----
    From: James Min [mailto:jminbrio.forte.com]
    Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 2:50 PM
    To: Sharma, Sandeep; Pyatetskiy, Alexander
    Cc: sophiaforte.com; kenlforte.com; Tenerelli, Mike
    Subject: Re: Case 59063: performance issues w/ C TLIB and Forte 3M
    Hello,
    I just want to reiterate that we are very committed to working on
    this issue, and that our goal is to find out the root of the problem. But
    first I'd like to narrow down the avenues by process of elimination.
    Open Cursor is something that is commonly used in today's RDBMS. I
    know that you must test your query in ISQL using some kind of execute
    immediate, but Sybase should be able to handle an open cursor. I was
    wondering if your Sybase expert commented on the fact that the server is
    not responding to commonly used command like 'open cursor'. According to
    our developer, we are merely following the API from Sybase, and open cursor
    is not something that particularly slows down a query for several minutes
    (except maybe the very first time). The logs show that Forte is waiting for
    a status from the DB server. Actually, using prepared statements and open
    cursor ends up being more efficient in the long run.
    Some questions:
    1) Have you tried to do a prepared statement with open cursor in your ISQL
    session? If so, did it have the same slowness?
    2) How big is the table you are querying? How many rows are there? How many
    are returned?
    3) When there is a hang in Forte, is there disk-spinning or CPU usage in
    the database server side? On the Forte side? Absolutely no activity at all?
    We actually have a Sybase set-up here, and if you wish, we could test out
    your database and Forte PEX here. Since your queries seems to be running
    off of only one table, this might be the best option, as we could look at
    everything here, in house. To do this:
    a) BCP out the data into a flat file. (character format to make it portable)
    b) we need a script to create the table and indexes.
    c) the Forte PEX file of the app to test this out.
    d) the SQL staement that you issue in ISQL for comparison.
    If the situation warrants, we can give a concrete example of
    possible errors/bugs to a developer. Dial-in is still an option, but to be
    able to look at the TOOL code, database setup, etc. without the limitations
    of dial-up may be faster and more efficient. Please let me know if you can
    provide this, as well as the answers to the above questions, or if you have
    any questions.
    Regards,
    At 08:05 AM 3/30/00 -0500, Sharma, Sandeep wrote:
    James, Ken:
    FYI, see attached response from our Sybase expert, Dani Sasmita. She has
    already tried what you suggested and results are enclosed.
    ++
    Sandeep
    -----Original Message-----
    From: SASMITA, DANIAR
    Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 6:43 PM
    To: Pyatetskiy, Alexander
    Cc: Sharma, Sandeep; Tenerelli, Mike
    Subject: Re: FW: Case 59063: Select using LIKE has performance
    issues
    w/ CTLIB and Forte 3M
    We did that trick already.
    When it is hanging, I can see what is doing.
    It is doing OPEN CURSOR. But not clear the exact statement of the cursor
    it is trying to open.
    When we run the query directly to Sybase, not using Forte, it is clearly
    not opening any cursor.
    And running it directly to Sybase many times, the response is always
    consistently fast.
    It is just when the query runs from Forte to Sybase, it opens a cursor.
    But again, in the Forte code, Alex is not using any cursor.
    In trying to capture the query,we even tried to audit any statementcoming
    to Sybase. Same thing, just open cursor. No cursor declaration anywhere.==============================================
    James Min
    Technical Support Engineer - Forte Tools
    Sun Microsystems, Inc.
    1800 Harrison St., 17th Fl.
    Oakland, CA 94612
    james.minsun.com
    510.869.2056
    ==============================================
    Support Hotline: 510-451-5400
    CUSTOMERS open a NEW CASE with Technical Support:
    http://www.forte.com/support/case_entry.html
    CUSTOMERS view your cases and enter follow-up transactions:
    http://www.forte.com/support/view_calls.html

    Earthlink wrote:
    Contrary to my understanding, the <font face="courier">with_pipeline</font> procedure runs 6 time slower than the legacy <font face="courier">no_pipeline</font> procedure. Am I missing something? Well, we're missing a lot here.
    Like:
    - a database version
    - how did you test
    - what data do you have, how is it distributed, indexed
    and so on.
    If you want to find out what's going on then use a TRACE with wait events.
    All nessecary steps are explained in these threads:
    HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
    http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2009/02/basic-sql-statement-performance.html
    Another nice one is RUNSTATS:
    http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/ASKTOM.download_file?p_file=6551378329289980701

Maybe you are looking for

  • Define Number Ranges for Maintenance Plans

    Dear Friend's, At present Maint.plan category PM (Maint order) is not assigned to Group (Maint Plan Number) Here i have to define Internal Number Range for Maint.Plan How i can assign.Pls guide me step by step. Thanks in Advance. Regard's Sandeep The

  • Best Practice with Spark, display an animated loading screen

    In the past I would use Flash to create assests and then write the actionscript to interact with those assets.  So if I wanted to show an animated loading screen, I would create it in flash with the animation tools, set up it up to be a class of "Loa

  • How to remove symbol of line selection in module pool

    Hello Experts, I am working on a module pool where I have created a line selection. In this line selection when we click on the order number I have made a coding where it call new transaction. But I dont want the default symbol which comes during lin

  • Amounts which are exeeded net due date amounts in FBL5N Transaction

    Hello Guruu2019s, Will anyone guide me the Procedure to clear exceeded Net Due Date amounts in FBL5N transaction.

  • JSF & JavaScript

    Hello In some .jspx source i have: <?xml version='1.0' encoding='windows-1251'?> <jsp:root xmlns:jsp="http://java.sun.com/JSP/Page" version="2.0" xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html" xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"> <jsp:output omit-xml-decl