Performance issues - slowdowns...
Hi all,
Brand new iMac 20 inch Core 2 Duo. Working super for the first couple of days and now I notice some performance issues.
First of all, I had some crashes with Safari today. I had installed the Flip4Mac wmv add-on a few days ago. So, I deleted the Flip4Mac WMV browser plugins as suggested in the forums here and no crashes since.
However, Safari now takes a while to load if starting from "closed". The first few days, it opened much, much faster.
Also now iCal is slow to load (almost freezing system with the spinning colour wheel bussing about). It eventually loads, and works as expected - but the first few days it was super fast to load up.
Finally, I have noticed some other occasions where the system just becomes unresponsive. I still have mouse control (not a hard lock up), but I can't switch between programs or launch a new one. Waiting 10-20 seconds usually does the trick and I am again able to work as expected.
I am new to Macs after years as a PC user. In fact, I have a new MacBook Pro coming next week as well. Needless to say, I have made the switch by jumping in! So, I am learning a whole new world here and could use some help! I sure would like to retain the amazing performance I witnessed the first few days, so any assistance is most appreciated.
Best,
Stu
Allan's suggestions may be better than what I'm going to offer so I'd try them first. If gentler methods don't help, you may want to consider more drastic measures. As he pointed out, brand new hardware is not always perfect.
If you can easily back up all the data you have, I'd consider doing that, then do an erase and install. To do this, boot your Mac, insert the system install or restore disk that came with your Mac, restart, and hold down the C key right after it chimes. When you run through the installation prompts, click the Options Tab when you see it and choose erase and install, remembering that this will wipe out data you have not backed up elsewhere. (not trying to be condescending, just covering all the bases).
There could be some sort of small easy-to-fix issue that Allan's tips will fix. If, OTOH, there is a hardware issue, doing and erase and install will clear up that question pretty quickly. The erase and install will put you back to "factory condition" as far as software is concerned. If problems develop again in a day or two (or sooner) then you should call Apple. Just don't forget to mention you've already done an erase and install.
good luck
Jeff
Similar Messages
-
Performance issues since upgrade
I am on a late 2011 MacBook Pro and am having severs performance issues since upgrading to Mavericks. I fear my issues may be related to company installed anti-virus (which I cannot remove), but I was hoping someone could look over my EtreCheck for other potential solutions.
One really odd issue I am having, which I cannot seem to find good information for on Google, is at least 4-5 times a day my Mac just stops. No beach ball, no anything, for about 1-5 minutes. Then it's fine. Maybe just me grasping at straws, but it seems related to a when webpage loads a bunch of images? I always use Safari btw, but testing other browsers, like Chrome & Firefox, it happens as well.
I have also removed TotalFinder and have noticed no improvement and still have the above issue.
Thanks in advance!
Here is my EtreCheck:
Problem description:
slow performance on Mavericks
EtreCheck version: 2.0.11 (98)
Report generated November 11, 2014 at 8:51:26 AM EST
Hardware Information: ℹ️
MacBook Pro (17-inch, Late 2011) (Verified)
MacBook Pro - model: MacBookPro8,3
1 2.5 GHz Intel Core i7 CPU: 4-core
8 GB RAM Upgradeable
BANK 0/DIMM0
4 GB DDR3 1333 MHz ok
BANK 1/DIMM0
4 GB DDR3 1333 MHz ok
Bluetooth: Old - Handoff/Airdrop2 not supported
Wireless: en1: 802.11 a/b/g/n
Video Information: ℹ️
Intel HD Graphics 3000 - VRAM: 512 MB
AMD Radeon HD 6770M - VRAM: 1024 MB
Color LCD 1920 x 1200
LED Cinema Display 1920 x 1200
System Software: ℹ️
OS X 10.9.5 (13F34) - Uptime: 0:46:22
Disk Information: ℹ️
APPLE HDD HTS727575A9E362 disk0 : (750.16 GB)
S.M.A.R.T. Status: Verified
EFI (disk0s1) <not mounted> : 210 MB
Macintosh HD (disk0s2) / [Startup]: 749.30 GB (256.69 GB free)
Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted> [Recovery]: 650 MB
MATSHITADVD-R UJ-8A8
USB Information: ℹ️
Apple Inc. FaceTime HD Camera (Built-in)
Fitbit Inc. Fitbit Base Station
Apple Inc. BRCM2070 Hub
Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
Apple Inc. Apple Internal Keyboard / Trackpad
Apple, Inc. Keyboard Hub
Apple, Inc Apple Keyboard
Tablet PTZ-630
Logitech Logitech USB Headset
Apple Inc. Display iSight
Apple Inc. Apple LED Cinema Display
Apple Inc. Display Audio
Apple Computer, Inc. IR Receiver
Firewire Information: ℹ️
Iomega HDD unknown_device 800mbit - 800mbit max
S.M.A.R.T. Status: Verified
disk1s1 (disk1s1) <not mounted> : 32 KB
Iomega HDD (disk1s3) /Volumes/Iomega HDD : 500.04 GB (22.88 GB free)
Files (disk1s5) /Volumes/Files : 499.90 GB (416.87 GB free)
Thunderbolt Information: ℹ️
Apple Inc. thunderbolt_bus
Gatekeeper: ℹ️
Anywhere
Kernel Extensions: ℹ️
/Library/Application Support/Symantec/Protector
[not loaded] com.symantec.kext.protector.panther (1.0f5) Support
[not loaded] com.symantec.kext.protector.tigerplus (1.0f5) Support
/Library/StartupItems/SymAutoProtect
[loaded] com.Symantec.kext.SAVAPComm (11.0.6) Support
/System/Library/Extensions
[loaded] com.Cycling74.driver.Soundflower (1.5.1) Support
[loaded] com.InnovationTechnology.driver.ComputerAudio (1.01 - SDK 10.7) Support
[not loaded] com.cisco.nke.ipsec (2.0.1) Support
[not loaded] com.wacom.kext.wacomtablet (6.3.7 - SDK 10.8) Support
Startup Items: ℹ️
CiscoVPN: Path: /System/Library/StartupItems/CiscoVPN
NortonMissedTasks: Path: /Library/StartupItems/NortonMissedTasks
SMC: Path: /Library/StartupItems/SMC
SymAutoProtect: Path: /Library/StartupItems/SymAutoProtect
SymProtector: Path: /Library/StartupItems/SymProtector
Startup items are obsolete and will not work in future versions of OS X
Launch Agents: ℹ️
[not loaded] com.adobe.AAM.Updater-1.0.plist Support
[loaded] com.adobe.CS5ServiceManager.plist Support
[loaded] com.google.keystone.agent.plist Support
[running] com.jamfsoftware.jamf.agent.plist Support
[loaded] com.oracle.java.Java-Updater.plist Support
[running] com.symantec.quickmenu.application.plist Support
[running] com.wacom.wacomtablet.plist Support
[running] net.juniper.pulsetray.plist Support
Launch Daemons: ℹ️
[loaded] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist Support
[running] com.fitbit.fitbitd.plist Support
[running] com.fitbit.galileod.plist Support
[loaded] com.google.keystone.daemon.plist Support
[running] com.jamfsoftware.jamf.daemon.plist Support
[not loaded] com.jamfsoftware.startupItem.plist Support
[loaded] com.jamfsoftware.task.1.plist Support
[loaded] com.microsoft.office.licensing.helper.plist Support
[loaded] com.oracle.java.Helper-Tool.plist Support
[loaded] com.oracle.java.JavaUpdateHelper.plist Support
[loaded] com.rogueamoeba.instanton-agent.plist Support
[running] net.juniper.AccessService.plist Support
[loaded] net.juniper.UninstallPulse.plist Support
User Launch Agents: ℹ️
[loaded] com.valvesoftware.steamclean.plist Support
[running] ws.agile.1PasswordAgent.plist Support
User Login Items: ℹ️
gfxCardStatus Application (/Users/[redacted]/Downloads/gfxCardStatus.app)
Dropbox Application (/Applications/Dropbox.app)
Microsoft Database Daemon Application (/Applications/Microsoft Office 2011/Office/Microsoft Database Daemon.app)
cdn Volume (/Volumes/cdn)
TotalFinder Application (/Applications/TotalFinder.app)
SAVDiskMountNotify Application (/Library/Application Support/Symantec/AntiVirus/SAVDiskMountNotify.app)
ScanNotification Application (/Library/Application Support/Symantec/AntiVirus/ScanNotification.app)
SymSecondaryLaunch Application (/Library/Application Support/Norton Solutions Support/Scheduler/SymSecondaryLaunch.app)
Internet Plug-ins: ℹ️
OfficeLiveBrowserPlugin: Version: 12.3.6 Support
Flash Player: Version: 15.0.0.189 - SDK 10.6 Mismatch! Adobe recommends 15.0.0.223
AdobePDFViewer: Version: 10.0.2 Support
Unity Web Player: Version: UnityPlayer version 4.5.4f1 - SDK 10.6 Support
googletalkbrowserplugin: Version: 5.38.6.0 - SDK 10.8 Support
AdobeExManDetect: Version: AdobeExManDetect 1.1.0.0 - SDK 10.7 Support
iPhotoPhotocast: Version: 7.0
DirectorShockwave: Version: 11.5.9r620 Support
QuickTime Plugin: Version: 7.7.3
FlashPlayer-10.6: Version: 15.0.0.189 - SDK 10.6 Support
Silverlight: Version: 4.0.60310.0 Support
MeetingJoinPlugin: Version: (null) - SDK 10.6 Support
net.juniper.DSSafariExtensions: Version: (null) Support
Default Browser: Version: 537 - SDK 10.9
Flip4Mac WMV Plugin: Version: 2.3.1.2 Support
o1dbrowserplugin: Version: 5.38.6.0 - SDK 10.8 Support
WacomTabletPlugin: Version: WacomTabletPlugin 2.1.0.2 Support
SharePointBrowserPlugin: Version: 14.4.5 - SDK 10.6 Support
JavaAppletPlugin: Version: Java 7 Update 71 Check version
WacomNetscape: Version: 2.1.0-1 - SDK 10.8 Support
User Internet Plug-ins: ℹ️
SOEWebInstaller: Version: 1.0 - SDK 10.5 Support
Aspera Web 3.1.2.72265: Version: (null) - SDK 10.6 Support
Safari Extensions: ℹ️
1Password
Adblock Plus
Reddit Enhancement Suite
3rd Party Preference Panes: ℹ️
Flash Player Support
Flip4Mac WMV Support
Java Support
MacFUSE Support
SymAutoProtect
Symantec\nQuickMenu Support
WacomTablet Support
Time Machine: ℹ️
Skip System Files: NO
Mobile backups: ON
Auto backup: YES
Destinations:
Iomega HDD [Local]
Total size: 500.04 GB
Total number of backups: 37
Oldest backup: 2014-10-14 14:11:11 +0000
Last backup: 2014-11-11 13:27:48 +0000
Size of backup disk: Excellent
Backup size 500.04 GB > (Disk size 0 B X 3)
Top Processes by CPU: ℹ️
36% com.apple.WebKit.Plugin.64
34% SymAutoProtect
13% WindowServer
9% Unity
4% Activity Monitor
Top Processes by Memory: ℹ️
455 MB Safari
361 MB com.apple.WebKit.Plugin.64
292 MB Unity
77 MB com.apple.WebKit.Networking
77 MB com.apple.WebKit.WebContent
Virtual Memory Information: ℹ️
2.08 GB Free RAM
2.39 GB Active RAM
1.34 GB Inactive RAM
1.40 GB Wired RAM
1.11 GB Page-ins
5.54 GB Page-outsActivity Monitor - Mavericks also Yosemite
Activity Monitor in Mavericks has significant changes
Performance Guide
Why is my computer slow
Why your Mac runs slower than it should
Slow Mac After Mavericks
Things you can do to resolve slowdowns see post by Kappy -
RedHat AS4 and Oracle 10R2 upgrade - performance issue
Hi all,
As part of our database upgrade project (from Oracle 10.2.0.1 to 10.2.0.3), we decided to upgrade our OS as well (RedHat AS4 from Update 2 to Update 4, 64-bit). We are in testing phase now and having some serious performance issues.
These below are steps that we have performed:
1. Ran db load testing plus Application Regression testing in order to get a baseline
2. Upgraded RH AS4 from Update 2 to Update 4
3. Ran db load testing plus Application Regression testing
4. Database load testing (including massive parallel processes, like 'insert into ...', 'create indexes ...parallel',etc ...) showed significant slowdown compared to our 'baseline' test (Update 2): 70-80%. The database is still Oracle 10.2.0.1, only RH was updated at this point
5. We upgraded Oracle 10.2.0.1 to 10.2.0.3, latest CPU , etc ...(Update 4 on OS side) still same slowdown in performances ...
6. Our Application Regression Testing has showed performance degradation also but not in same extent as db load test (10-20 % on different application modules)
7. We also did one more thing : went back and upgraded Oracle with Update 2 (some 'workarounds' were required but that's another story). Performances were OK. So it seems our problem is not (directly) related to Oracle version.
Now we are going to install Update 6 (the latest update for AS4) and see how it goes.
If anybody have any experience or idea about this case and want to share it with us, it would be highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Milan N.Just a quick update for those who follow this thread ...
Everything worked fine with 'Update 6' kernel (both Oracle 10.2.0.1 and 10.2.0.3). We have also applied all available security packages.
Milan N. -
ITunes 7.3.2.6 and Windows Vista Performance Issues
I recently purchased an 80GB iPod, and downloaded iTunes promptly, disregarding all the negative attention about how "iTunes crashes your computer" or "iTunes kills Windows". So far, the only real problem I've had with iTunes is the amazingly poor performance it has on my computer. When iTunes is minimized to the system tray, or compressed into Mini Player mode, it runs better, but not well.
Running in the full mode, the player bogs down my computer substantially. Knowing my laptop isn't a powerhouse, I expected a slight bit of slowdown, since there is some evident with QuickTime.
UPDATE: I've just stumbled across something. Apparently, wiggling my mouse over the iTunes program, iTunes runs about two or three times faster. The moment I stop moving the mouse cursor over the window, the speeds return to slow. It seems to only do this during the "Processing Album Artwork" phase. Bizarre? Very. Any explanations?
I find this to be very annoying, especially when syncing. Syncing my library (which is about five or six gigabytes) takes an amazingly long time. Are there any workarounds, registry hacks, or anything else that can be done? Thanks!
Message was edited by: AtlinkDo you have ReadyBoost enabled on the PC? If so, by way of experiment, try disabling that as per the instructions from the following document:
Troubleshooting iTunes for Windows Vista video playback performance issues
... any help at all with the performance issues? -
Major Performance Issues in Flash 8
I have been experiencing major slowdown in the Flash 8
authoring tool... I am working with large files (about 40-50mb
.fla).
My system specs aren't too bad but maybe not enough?
1.5Ghz Pentium M
512mb RAM
1024mb virtual memory...
Is there anything that specifically causes Flash to slow way
down? I'm thinking about tweaking my system (either settings or by
upgrading hardware) but I don't know what would help Flash with
larger projects. I'm assuming that more RAM would speed things up,
but I don't want to jump to that assumption and buy it without
knowing for sure...
...any ideas?Yes... more graphics = heavier load...
...obviously.
However the performance issues here I'm talking about aren't
just slight slowdown issues. It is a MAJOR slowdown problem that
occurs suddenly. This means that once I hit a certain filesize,
Flash slows down and will not respond for MINUTES. If it were a
simple "you added more graphics" problem, then it would show a
gradual decrease in performance.
What I was really wanted to know is what is the weak link
concerning Flash performance? Is it RAM, processor speed, or
something else?
I can upgrade, but I'm not buying a new multi-processor
machine...it's not feasible, and not to mention it's a huge
overkill. -
Report Performance Issue - Activity
Hi gurus,
I'm developing an Activity report using Transactional database (Online real time object).
the purpose of the report is to list down all contacts related activities and activities NOT related to Contact by activity owner (user id).
In order to fullfill that requirment I've created 2 report
1) All Activities related to Contact -- Report A
pull in Acitivity ID , Activity Type, Status, Contact ID
2) All Activities not related to Contact UNION All Activities related to Contact (Base report) -- Report B
to get the list of activities not related to contact i'm using Advanced filter based on result of another request which is I think is the part that slow down the query.
<Activity ID not equal to any Activity ID in Report B>
Anyone encountered performance issue due to the advanced filter in analytic before?
any input is really appriciated
Thanks in advanced,
FinaFina,
Union is always the last option. If you can get all record in one report, do not use union.
since all records, which you are targeting, are in the activity subject area, it is not nessecery to combine reports. add a column with the following logic
if contact id is null (or = 'Unspecified') then owner name else contact name
Hopefully, this is helping. -
Report performance Issue in BI Answers
Hi All,
We have a performance issues with reports. Report is running more than 10 mins. we took query from the session log and ran it in database, at that time it took not more than 2 mins. We have verified proper indexes on the where clause columns.
Could any once suggest to improve the performance in BI answers?
Thanks in advance,I hope you dont have many case statements and complex calculations that you do in the Answers.
Next thing you need to monitor is how many rows of data that you are trying to retrieve from the query. If the volume is huge then it takes time to do the formatting on the Answers as you are going to dump huge volumes of data. Database(like teradata) returns initially like 1-2000 records if you hit show all records then even db is gonna fair amount of time if you are dumping many records
hope it helps
thanks
Prash -
BW BCS cube(0bcs_vc10 ) Report huge performance issue
Hi Masters,
I am working out for a solution for BW report developed in 0bcs_vc10 virtual cube.
Some of the querys is taking more 15 to 20 minutes to execute the report.
This is huge performance issue. We are using BW 3.5, and report devloped in bex and published thru portal. Any one faced similar problem please advise how you tackle this issue. Please give the detail analysis approach how you resolved this issue.
Current service pack we are using is
SAP_BW 350 0016 SAPKW35016
FINBASIS 300 0012 SAPK-30012INFINBASIS
BI_CONT 353 0008 SAPKIBIFP8
SEM-BW 400 0012 SAPKGS4012
Best of Luck
Chris
BW BCS cube(0bcs_vc10 ) Report huge performance issueRavi,
I already did that, it is not helping me much for the performance. Reports are taking 15 t0 20 minutes. I wanted any body in this forum have the same issue how
they resolved it.
Regards,
Chris -
This is the question we will try to answer...
What si the bottle neck (hardware) of Adobe Premiere Pro CS6
I used PPBM5 as a benchmark testing template.
All the data and log as been collected using performance counter
First of all, describe my computer...
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 8 Pro 64-bit
CPU
Intel Xeon E5 2687W @ 3.10GHz
Sandy Bridge-EP/EX 32nm Technology
RAM
Corsair Dominator Platinum 64.0 GB DDR3
Motherboard
EVGA Corporation Classified SR-X
Graphics
PNY Nvidia Quadro 6000
EVGA Nvidia GTX 680 // Yes, I created bench stats for both card
Hard Drives
16.0GB Romex RAMDISK (RAID)
556GB LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i SATA3 6GB/s 5 disks with Fastpath Chip Installed (RAID 0)
I have other RAID installed, but not relevant for the present post...
PSU
Cosair 1000 Watts
After many days of tests, I wanna share my results with community and comment them.
CPU Introduction
I tested my cpu and pushed it at maximum speed to understand where is the limit, can I reach this limit and I've logged precisely all result in graph (See pictures 1).
Intro : I tested my E5-XEON 2687W (8 Cores Hyperthread - 16 threads) to know if programs can use the maximum of it. I used Prime 95 to get the result. // I know this seem to be ordinary, but you will understand soon...
The result : Yes, I can get 100% of my CPU with 1 program using 20 threads in parallel. The CPU gives everything it can !
Comment : I put 3 IO (cpu, disk, ram) on the graph of my computer during the test...
(picture 1)
Disk Introduction
I tested my disk and pushed it at maximum speed to understand where is the limit and I've logged precisely all result in graph (See pictures 2).
Intro : I tested my RAID 0 556GB (LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i SATA3 6GB/s 5 disks with Fastpath Chip Installed) to know if I can reach the maximum % disk usage (0% idle Time)
The result : As you can see in picture 2, yes, I can get the max of my drive at ~ 1.2 Gb/sec read/write steady !
Comment : I put 3 IO (cpu, disk, ram) on the graph of my computer during the test to see the impact of transfering many Go of data during ~10 sec...
(picture 2)
Now, I know my limits ! It's time to enter deeper in the subject !
PPBM5 (H.264) Result
I rendered the sequence (H.264) using Adobe Media Encoder.
The result :
My CPU is not used at 100%, the turn around 50%
My Disk is totally idle !
All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
The transfert rate seem to be a wave (up and down). Probably caused by (Encrypt time.... write.... Encrypt time.... write...) // It's ok, ~5Mb/sec during transfert rate !
CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
RAM, more than enough ! 39 Go RAM free after the test ! // Excellent
~65 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Good, thread is the sign that program try to using many cores !)
GPU Load on card seem to be a wave also ! (up and down) ~40% usage of GPU during the process of encoding.
GPU Ram get 1.2Go of RAM (But with GTX 680, no problem and Quadro 6000 with 6 GB RAM, no problem !)
Comment/Question : CPU is free (50%), disks are free (99%), GPU is free (60%), RAM is free (62%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process. Why ???? Is there some time delay in the encoding process ?
Other : Quadro 6000 & GTX 680 gives the same result !
(picture 3)
PPBM5 (Disk Test) Result (RAID LSI)
I rendered the sequence (Disk Test) using Adobe Media Encoder on my RAID 0 LSI disk.
The result :
My CPU is not used at 100%
My Disk wave and wave again, but far far from the limit !
All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
The transfert rate wave and wave again (up and down). Probably caused by (Buffering time.... write.... Buffering time.... write...) // It's ok, ~375Mb/sec peak during transfert rate ! Easy !
CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
RAM, more than enough ! 40.5 Go RAM free after the test ! // Excellent
~48 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Good, thread is the sign that program try to using many cores !)
GPU Load on card = 0 (This kind of encoding is GPU irrelevant)
GPU Ram get 400Mb of RAM (No usage for encoding)
Comment/Question : CPU is free (65%), disks are free (60%), GPU is free (100%), RAM is free (63%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process. Why ???? Is there some time delay in the encoding process ?
(picture 4)
PPBM5 (Disk Test) Result (Direct in RAMDrive)
I rendered the same sequence (Disk Test) using Adobe Media Encoder directly in my RamDrive
Comment/Question : Look at the transfert rate under (picture 5). It's exactly the same speed than with my RAID 0 LSI controller. Impossible ! Look in the same picture the transfert rate I can reach with the ramdrive (> 3.0 Gb/sec steady) and I don't go under 30% of disk usage. CPU is idle (70%), Disk is idle (100%), GPU is idle (100%) and RAM is free (63%). // This kind of results let me REALLY confused. It's smell bug and big problem with hardware and IO usage in CS6 !
(picture 5)
PPBM5 (MPEG-DVD) Result
I rendered the sequence (MPEG-DVD) using Adobe Media Encoder.
The result :
My CPU is not used at 100%
My Disk is totally idle !
All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
The transfert rate wave and wave again (up and down). Probably caused by (Encoding time.... write.... Encoding time.... write...) // It's ok, ~2Mb/sec during transfert rate ! Real Joke !
CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
RAM, more than enough ! 40 Go RAM free after the test ! // Excellent
~80 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Lot of thread, but it's ok in multi-thread apps!)
GPU Load on card = 100 (This use the maximum of my GPU)
GPU Ram get 1Gb of RAM
Comment/Question : CPU is free (70%), disks are free (98%), GPU is loaded (MAX), RAM is free (63%), my computer is pushed at limit during the encoding process for GPU only. Now, for this kind of encoding, the speed limit is affected by the slower IO (Video Card GPU)
Other : Quadro 6000 is slower than GTX 680 for this kind of encoding (~20 s slower than GTX).
(picture 6)
Encoding single clip FULL HD AVCHD to H.264 Result (Premiere Pro CS6)
You can look the result in the picture.
Comment/Question : CPU is free (55%), disks are free (99%), GPU is free (90%), RAM is free (65%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process. Why ???? Adobe Premiere seem to have some bug with thread management. My hardware is idle ! I understand AVCHD can be very difficult to decode, but where is the waste ? My computer want, but the software not !
(picture 7)
Render composition using 3D Raytracer in After Effects CS6
You can look the result in the picture.
Comment : GPU seems to be the bottle neck when using After Effects. CPU is free (99%), Disks are free (98%), Memory is free (60%) and it depend of the setting and type of project.
Other : Quadro 6000 & GTX 680 gives the same result in time for rendering the composition.
(picture 8)
Conclusion
There is nothing you can do (I thing) with CS6 to get better performance actually. GTX 680 is the best (Consumer grade card) and the Quadro 6000 is the best (Profressional card). Both of card give really similar result (I will probably return my GTX 680 since I not really get any better performance). I not used Tesla card with my Quadro, but actually, both, Premiere Pro & After Effects doesn't use multi GPU. I tried to used both card together (GTX & Quadro), but After Effects gives priority to the slower card (In this case, the GTX 680)
Premiere Pro, I'm speechless ! Premiere Pro is not able to get max performance of my computer. Not just 10% or 20%, but average 60%. I'm a programmor, multi-threadling apps are difficult to manage and I can understand Adobe's programmor. But actually, if anybody have comment about this post, tricks or any kind of solution, you can comment this post. It's seem to be a bug...
Thank you.Patrick,
I can't explain everything, but let me give you some background as I understand it.
The first issue is that CS6 has a far less efficient internal buffering or caching system than CS5/5.5. That is why the MPEG encoding in CS6 is roughly 2-3 times slower than the same test with CS5. There is some 'under-the-hood' processing going on that causes this significant performance loss.
The second issue is that AME does not handle regular memory and inter-process memory very well. I have described this here: Latest News
As to your test results, there are some other noteworthy things to mention. 3D Ray tracing in AE is not very good in using all CUDA cores. In fact it is lousy, it only uses very few cores and the threading is pretty bad and does not use the video card's capabilities effectively. Whether that is a driver issue with nVidia or an Adobe issue, I don't know, but whichever way you turn it, the end result is disappointing.
The overhead AME carries in our tests is something we are looking into and the next test will only use direct export and no longer the AME queue, to avoid some of the problems you saw. That entails other problems for us, since we lose the capability to check encoding logs, but a solution is in the works.
You see very low GPU usage during the H.264 test, since there are only very few accelerated parts in the timeline, in contrast to the MPEG2-DVD test, where there is rescaling going on and that is CUDA accelerated. The disk I/O test suffers from the problems mentioned above and is the reason that my own Disk I/O results are only 33 seconds with the current test, but when I extend the duration of that timeline to 3 hours, the direct export method gives me 22 seconds, although the amount of data to be written, 37,092 MB has increased threefold. An effective write speed of 1,686 MB/s.
There are a number of performance issues with CS6 that Adobe is aware of, but whether they can be solved and in what time, I haven't the faintest idea.
Just my $ 0.02 -
Performance Issue for BI system
Hello,
We are facing performance issues for BI System. Its a preproductive system and its performance is degrading badly everyday. I was checking system came to know program buffer hit ratio is increaasing everyday due to high Swaps. So asked to change the parameter abap/buffersize which was 300Mb to 500Mb. But still no major improvement is found in the system.
There is 16GB Ram available and Server is HP-UX and with Netweaver2004s with Oracle 10.2.0.4.0 installed in it.
The Main problem is while running a report or creating a query is taking way too long time.
Kindly help me.Hello SIva,
Thanks for your reply but i have checked ST02 and ST03 and also SM50 and its normal
we are having 9 dialog processes, 3 Background , 2 Update and 1 spool.
No one is using the system currently but in ST02 i can see the swaps are in red.
Buffer HitRatio % Alloc. KB Freesp. KB % Free Sp. Dir. Size FreeDirEnt % Free Dir Swaps DB Accs
Nametab (NTAB) 0
Table definition 99,60 6.798 20.000 29.532 153.221
Field definition 99,82 31.562 784 2,61 20.000 6.222 31,11 17.246 41.248
Short NTAB 99,94 3.625 2.446 81,53 5.000 2.801 56,02 0 2.254
Initial records 73,95 6.625 998 16,63 5.000 690 13,80 40.069 49.528
0
boldprogram 97,66 300.000 1.074 0,38 75.000 67.177 89,57 219.665 725.703bold
CUA 99,75 3.000 875 36,29 1.500 1.401 93,40 55.277 2.497
Screen 99,80 4.297 1.365 33,35 2.000 1.811 90,55 119 3.214
Calendar 100,00 488 361 75,52 200 42 21,00 0 158
OTR 100,00 4.096 3.313 100,00 2.000 2.000 100,00 0
0
Tables 0
Generic Key 99,17 29.297 1.450 5,23 5.000 350 7,00 2.219 3.085.633
Single record 99,43 10.000 1.907 19,41 500 344 68,80 39 467.978
0
Export/import 82,75 4.096 43 1,30 2.000 662 33,10 137.208
Exp./ Imp. SHM 89,83 4.096 438 13,22 2.000 1.482 74,10 0
SAP Memory Curr.Use % CurUse[KB] MaxUse[KB] In Mem[KB] OnDisk[KB] SAPCurCach HitRatio %
Roll area 2,22 5.832 22.856 131.072 131.072 IDs 96,61
Page area 1,08 2.832 24.144 65.536 196.608 Statement 79,00
Extended memory 22,90 958.464 1.929.216 4.186.112 0 0,00
Heap memory 0 0 1.473.767 0 0,00
Call Stati HitRatio % ABAP/4 Req ABAP Fails DBTotCalls AvTime[ms] DBRowsAff.
Select single 88,59 63.073.369 5.817.659 4.322.263 0 57.255.710
Select 72,68 284.080.387 0 13.718.442 0 32.199.124
Insert 0,00 151.955 5.458 166.159 0 323.725
Update 0,00 378.161 97.884 395.814 0 486.880
Delete 0,00 389.398 332.619 415.562 0 244.495
Edited by: Srikanth Sunkara on May 12, 2011 11:50 AM -
RE: Case 59063: performance issues w/ C TLIB and Forte3M
Hi James,
Could you give me a call, I am at my desk.
I had meetings all day and couldn't respond to your calls earlier.
-----Original Message-----
From: James Min [mailto:jminbrio.forte.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 2:50 PM
To: Sharma, Sandeep; Pyatetskiy, Alexander
Cc: sophiaforte.com; kenlforte.com; Tenerelli, Mike
Subject: Re: Case 59063: performance issues w/ C TLIB and Forte 3M
Hello,
I just want to reiterate that we are very committed to working on
this issue, and that our goal is to find out the root of the problem. But
first I'd like to narrow down the avenues by process of elimination.
Open Cursor is something that is commonly used in today's RDBMS. I
know that you must test your query in ISQL using some kind of execute
immediate, but Sybase should be able to handle an open cursor. I was
wondering if your Sybase expert commented on the fact that the server is
not responding to commonly used command like 'open cursor'. According to
our developer, we are merely following the API from Sybase, and open cursor
is not something that particularly slows down a query for several minutes
(except maybe the very first time). The logs show that Forte is waiting for
a status from the DB server. Actually, using prepared statements and open
cursor ends up being more efficient in the long run.
Some questions:
1) Have you tried to do a prepared statement with open cursor in your ISQL
session? If so, did it have the same slowness?
2) How big is the table you are querying? How many rows are there? How many
are returned?
3) When there is a hang in Forte, is there disk-spinning or CPU usage in
the database server side? On the Forte side? Absolutely no activity at all?
We actually have a Sybase set-up here, and if you wish, we could test out
your database and Forte PEX here. Since your queries seems to be running
off of only one table, this might be the best option, as we could look at
everything here, in house. To do this:
a) BCP out the data into a flat file. (character format to make it portable)
b) we need a script to create the table and indexes.
c) the Forte PEX file of the app to test this out.
d) the SQL staement that you issue in ISQL for comparison.
If the situation warrants, we can give a concrete example of
possible errors/bugs to a developer. Dial-in is still an option, but to be
able to look at the TOOL code, database setup, etc. without the limitations
of dial-up may be faster and more efficient. Please let me know if you can
provide this, as well as the answers to the above questions, or if you have
any questions.
Regards,
At 08:05 AM 3/30/00 -0500, Sharma, Sandeep wrote:
James, Ken:
FYI, see attached response from our Sybase expert, Dani Sasmita. She has
already tried what you suggested and results are enclosed.
++
Sandeep
-----Original Message-----
From: SASMITA, DANIAR
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 6:43 PM
To: Pyatetskiy, Alexander
Cc: Sharma, Sandeep; Tenerelli, Mike
Subject: Re: FW: Case 59063: Select using LIKE has performance
issues
w/ CTLIB and Forte 3M
We did that trick already.
When it is hanging, I can see what is doing.
It is doing OPEN CURSOR. But not clear the exact statement of the cursor
it is trying to open.
When we run the query directly to Sybase, not using Forte, it is clearly
not opening any cursor.
And running it directly to Sybase many times, the response is always
consistently fast.
It is just when the query runs from Forte to Sybase, it opens a cursor.
But again, in the Forte code, Alex is not using any cursor.
In trying to capture the query,we even tried to audit any statementcoming
to Sybase. Same thing, just open cursor. No cursor declaration anywhere.==============================================
James Min
Technical Support Engineer - Forte Tools
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
1800 Harrison St., 17th Fl.
Oakland, CA 94612
james.minsun.com
510.869.2056
==============================================
Support Hotline: 510-451-5400
CUSTOMERS open a NEW CASE with Technical Support:
http://www.forte.com/support/case_entry.html
CUSTOMERS view your cases and enter follow-up transactions:
http://www.forte.com/support/view_calls.htmlEarthlink wrote:
Contrary to my understanding, the <font face="courier">with_pipeline</font> procedure runs 6 time slower than the legacy <font face="courier">no_pipeline</font> procedure. Am I missing something? Well, we're missing a lot here.
Like:
- a database version
- how did you test
- what data do you have, how is it distributed, indexed
and so on.
If you want to find out what's going on then use a TRACE with wait events.
All nessecary steps are explained in these threads:
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2009/02/basic-sql-statement-performance.html
Another nice one is RUNSTATS:
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/ASKTOM.download_file?p_file=6551378329289980701 -
Is there a recommended limit on the number of custom sections and the cells per table so that there are no performance issues with the UI?
Thanks Kelly,
The answers would be the following:
1200 cells per custom section (NEW COUNT), and up to 30 custom sections per spec.
Assuming all will be populated, and this would apply to all final material specs in the system which could be ~25% of all material specs.
The cells will be numeric, free text, drop downs, and some calculated numeric.
Are we reaching the limits for UI performance?
Thanks -
IOS 8.1+ Performance Issue
Hello,
I encountered a serious performance bug in Adobe Air iOS application on devices running iOS 8.1 or later. Approximately in 1-2 minutes fps drops to 7 or lower without interacting with the app. This is very noticeable in the app. The app looks like frozen for about 0.5 seconds. The bug doesn't appear on every session.
Devices tested: iPad Mini iOS 8.1.1, iPhone 6 iOS 8.2. iPod Touch 4 iOS 6 is working correctly.
Air SDK versions: 15 and 17 tested.
I can track the bug using Adobe Scout. There is a noticeable spike on frame time 1.16. Framerate drops to 7.0. The App spends much time on function Runtime overhead. Sometimes the top activity is Running AS3 attached to frame or Waiting For Next Frame instead of Runtime overhead.
The bug can be reproduced on an empty application having a one bitmap on stage. Open the app and wait for two minutes and the bug should appear. If not, just close and relaunch the app.
Bugbase link: Bug#3965160 - iOS 8.1+ Performance Issue
Miska SavelaHi
Id already activated Messages and entered the 6 digit code I was presented with into my iPhone. I can receive txt messages from non iOS users on my iMac and can reply to those messages.
I just can't send a new message from scratch to a non iOS user :-s
Thanks
Baz -
Returning multiple values from a called tabular form(performance issue)
I hope someone can help with this.
I have a form that calls another form to display a multiple column tabular list of values(needs to allow for user sorting so could not use a LOV).
The user selects one or more records from the list by using check boxes. In order to detect the records selected I loop through the block looking for boxes checked off and return those records to the calling form via a PL/SQL table.
The form displaying the tabular list loads quickly(about 5000 records in the base table). However when I select one or more values from the table and return back to the calling form, it takes a while(about 3-4 minutes) to return to the called form with the selected values.
I guess it is going through the block(all 5000 records) looking for boxes checked off and that is what is causing the noticeable pause.
Is this normal given the data volumes I have or are there any other perhaps better techniques or tricks I could use to improve performance. I am using Forms6i.
Sorry for being so long-winded and thanks in advance for any help.Try writing to your PL/SQL table when the user selects (or remove when deselect) by usuing a when-checkbox-changed trigger. This will eliminate the need for you top loop through a block with 5000 records and should improve your performance.
I am not aware of any performance issues with PL/SQL tables in forms, but if you still have slow performance try using a shared record-group instead. I have used these in the past for exactly the same thing and had no performance problems.
Hope this helps,
Candace Stover
Forms Product Management -
Performance issues with class loader on Windows server
We are observing some performance issues in our application. We are Using weblogic 11g with Java6 on a windows 2003 server
The thread dumps indicate many threads are waiting in queue for the native file methods:
"[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '106' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'" RUNNABLE
java.io.WinNTFileSystem.getBooleanAttributes(Native Method)
java.io.File.exists(Unknown Source)
weblogic.utils.classloaders.ClasspathClassFinder.getFileSource(ClasspathClassFinder.java:398)
weblogic.utils.classloaders.ClasspathClassFinder.getSourcesInternal(ClasspathClassFinder.java:347)
weblogic.utils.classloaders.ClasspathClassFinder.getSource(ClasspathClassFinder.java:316)
weblogic.application.io.ManifestFinder.getSource(ManifestFinder.java:75)
weblogic.utils.classloaders.MultiClassFinder.getSource(MultiClassFinder.java:67)
weblogic.application.utils.CompositeWebAppFinder.getSource(CompositeWebAppFinder.java:71)
weblogic.utils.classloaders.MultiClassFinder.getSource(MultiClassFinder.java:67)
weblogic.utils.classloaders.MultiClassFinder.getSource(MultiClassFinder.java:67)
weblogic.utils.classloaders.CodeGenClassFinder.getSource(CodeGenClassFinder.java:33)
weblogic.utils.classloaders.GenericClassLoader.findResource(GenericClassLoader.java:210)
weblogic.utils.classloaders.GenericClassLoader.getResourceInternal(GenericClassLoader.java:160)
weblogic.utils.classloaders.GenericClassLoader.getResource(GenericClassLoader.java:182)
java.lang.ClassLoader.getResourceAsStream(Unknown Source)
javax.xml.parsers.SecuritySupport$4.run(Unknown Source)
java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
javax.xml.parsers.SecuritySupport.getResourceAsStream(Unknown Source)
javax.xml.parsers.FactoryFinder.findJarServiceProvider(Unknown Source)
javax.xml.parsers.FactoryFinder.find(Unknown Source)
javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance(Unknown Source)
org.ajax4jsf.context.ResponseWriterContentHandler.<init>(ResponseWriterContentHandler.java:48)
org.ajax4jsf.context.ViewResources$HeadResponseWriter.<init>(ViewResources.java:259)
org.ajax4jsf.context.ViewResources.processHeadResources(ViewResources.java:445)
org.ajax4jsf.application.AjaxViewHandler.renderView(AjaxViewHandler.java:193)
org.apache.myfaces.lifecycle.RenderResponseExecutor.execute(RenderResponseExecutor.java:41)
org.apache.myfaces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.render(LifecycleImpl.java:140)
On googling this seems to be an issue with java file handling on windows servers and I couldn't find a solution yet. Any recommendation or pointer is appreciatedHi shubhu,
I just analyzed your partial Thread Dump data, the problem is that the ajax4jsf framework ResponseWriterContentHandler triggers internally a new instance of the DocumentBuilderFactory; every time; triggering heavy IO contention because of Class loader / JAR file search operations.
Too many of these IO operations under heavy load will create excessive contention and severe performance degradation; regardless of the OS you are running your JVM on.
Please review the link below and see if this is related to your problem.. This is a known issue in JBOSS JIRA when using RichFaces / ajaxJSF.
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBPAPP-6166
Regards,
P-H
http://javaeesupportpatterns.blogspot.com/
Maybe you are looking for
-
Is there a better way to generate custom timed digital Signals
I am trying to generate digital output of high and lows with particular delays on different lines. Each daq assistant is activating single line on a port on USB 6501. There more complex high and lows that I need to generate with variable time differe
-
Dear Sapgurus, i have activate funds management settings,when i was activate system its not showing leading ledgers, again i deactivate fm systems system it shows leading ledgers, please guide me. Regards Raju
-
6.1.2, iPhone 4, Battery Failure
The update for iOS 6.1.2 came out yesterday and I was already experiencing the worst battery drain ever but when i updated my phone it got to the "restart stage" and showed the "0% battery" or "lightning" symbol. I've tried restoring it from recovery
-
Why is my rendered color corrected movie pixelated with jagged edges after rendering?
Hello All, I am new short film movie producer and have just started using Adobe Premiere CS6 and Audition CS6. Comparing my flat footage before adding it to a sequence and color correcting it and rendering it, it looks fair. But after all these tra
-
Applescript and "AirPort Utility"
I have the new Airport Base "n" and I found that the new "AirPort Utility" is "applescript" compliant... But I didn't find a way to do anathing with it... does someone use it with Applescript ? Thanks