Performance of ASCP Planner Workbench

Hi All,
I am facing a strange issue with ASCP Planner Workbench. We got a centralized instance. For TST instance, complete refresh is run and data is collected. Gather Schema Statistics run successfully with 40%. ASCP plan is run successfully.
Now while opening planner workbench, the planner workbench query hangs. Few queries work but then hangs again for the next step. Foe example: - If I run query to find specific item then query hangs. If it runs successfully ( after a long time) and I want to query Supply and Demand for specific item then again it hangs.
This is highly frustrating situation.
Request your input on what can be the issue and the resolutions if any.
Regards,
Yash

Hi Ganesh,
The closed PO's should not be there and shouldn't have PO in Receiving status either.
But the reason why you must be seeing this is because there is still a record in MTL_SUPPLY for this PO with supply type code as RECEIVING and hence its still
appearing in ASCP.
Please go by the below article if the supply is still shown in RECEIVING but PO's are completed and run the mentioned queries to diagnose and get the inventory transaction fixed.
Fully Received / Delivered / Finally Closed Po Line Still Appearing in Item Supply / Demand Form MS and RS (Doc ID 1364291.1)
Moreover, if you started seeing this issue more often then the best way is to put the piece of code in the collections hook i.e MSC_CL_CLEANSE API to purge the supplies from ODS if PO's are closed for those.
Thanks,
Abhishek Sharma
Please mark the post correct or helpful, if answered

Similar Messages

  • ASCp - Planner Workbench, PO in receicing order type record

    Dear Friends,
    In ASCP, Planner Workbench ,under a plan, supply and ddemand screen has an order type "PO in receicving" with firm flag enabled with future date for due dates
    We could see all the PO's for that item is closed. On hand Quantities also got increased based on that PO receipts.
    Can you please let me know, what does that mean by "PO in receicving" order type record and how for a closed PO's it is being shown?
    Thanks,
    Ganesh

    Hi Ganesh,
    The closed PO's should not be there and shouldn't have PO in Receiving status either.
    But the reason why you must be seeing this is because there is still a record in MTL_SUPPLY for this PO with supply type code as RECEIVING and hence its still
    appearing in ASCP.
    Please go by the below article if the supply is still shown in RECEIVING but PO's are completed and run the mentioned queries to diagnose and get the inventory transaction fixed.
    Fully Received / Delivered / Finally Closed Po Line Still Appearing in Item Supply / Demand Form MS and RS (Doc ID 1364291.1)
    Moreover, if you started seeing this issue more often then the best way is to put the piece of code in the collections hook i.e MSC_CL_CLEANSE API to purge the supplies from ODS if PO's are closed for those.
    Thanks,
    Abhishek Sharma
    Please mark the post correct or helpful, if answered

  • No IR suggestions in ASCP planner workbench

    Hi,
    I am siting an example for better understanding of the problem:
    Ingredients:
    Item A(Buy) : Org1
    Item B(Make) : Org1
    Product:
    Item C(Make) : Org 2
    My plan is in Org2.Both the items are also assigned to Org2.The sourcing rule for Org2 is set up like 'Transfer From' Org1.
    When I run the plan, i get recommendations for work order and purchase requisitions only.
    As per my understanding I was expecting Internal Requisition suggestion for the item that are transferred from Org1 as I am planning in Org2.
    Please suggest how ASCP will show internal requisition suggestions in planner workbench.
    Thanks

    there won't be recommendations for an internal req. It's always shown as purchase req. The difference will be in the source from. In the case of an IR it will source it from an org as opposed to an PR which will show a source supplier in the workbench. Key point to see the diff is the sourcing information which is present for the planned order.
    Once you release it it will be implemented as IR. In this case you will also get an ISO.

  • Can I releases planned orders in planner workbench  using inventory planner responsability (IO)

    Can I releases planned orders in planner workbench using inventory planner responsability (IO), in IO manual I found following information :
    Planner Workbench
    You can use the Planner Workbench in Oracle Advanced Supply Chain Planning to act on recommendations generated by the planning process for a plan. You can implement
    planned orders as discrete jobs or purchase requisitions, maintain planned orders, reschedule scheduled receipts, and implement repetitive schedules. You can choose all
    suggestions from an MRP plan, or only those that meet a certain criteria. In Oracle Inventory Optimization, Planner Workbench is used to perform tasks such as setting up
    item attributes, setting up supply chain BOM, and analyzing time-phased safety stocks.
    my question is Oracle Inventory Optimization, Planner Workbench can´t release planned orders.
    Thanks in advance
    regards James

    Hi James,
    We cannot release planned orders from IO workbench.
    IO is for safety stock planning, not for releasing planned orders. That is done from an ASCP plan which uses the IO plan as demand schedule.
    Regards,
    Mohan Balaji
    NOTE: Please mark the post as Helpful or Answered if the update has really helped you. This would also bring the thread to logical conclusion and will be helpful for the viewers.

  • Restriction of Need by Date in Planner workbench release against blanket PO

    Hi ,
    Needed some information on this query below :
    ==================================================
    For normal blanket PO, if the effective date is till 31-Jul-06 and if a release is done on this Blanket PO , with the need by date as ( example 02-Sep-06) , it still goes and does a release . There is no problem.
    But in the planner workbench release, if the need by date is greater than the BPO effective date , it does not allow to release ...
    Is this a constraint or any setup or any Profile blocking from doing this release ?
    Thanks
    Anil

    Sandeep,
    Thank yo for your information. Are you suggesting that we write an SQL report to identfy the POs which we want to update the PO Need By Date, then we utilize the Purchasing Documents Open Interface to update the PO Need By Date?
    Or would there be another way to do it from the ASCP workbench?
    We are talking about a few thousand POs ... so we need to automate.
    Thanks,
    Joe

  • ESYU: Planner Workbench Release process가 다른 user로부터 planned orders를 release

    Purpose
    Materials Requirement Planning - Version: 11.5.9 to 12.1
    Information in this document applies to any platform.
    11.5.9 ~ R12 version:
    두 명의 users가 MRP Planner Workbench에서 Release를 위해 records updating을 진행하는 경우, 두 명 중 한명만이 update 후 실제로 release를
    submit 했으나 두 명 user의 모든 records가 release 되어 버린다.
    User1은 자신의 Planned Orders 만을 release 할 수 있고, User2 또한 자신의 저장된 Planned Orders 만을 release 해야 한다.
    STEPS:
    1. User 1이 MRP Planned Workbench로 log
    2. User 1은 특정 planner code를 위한 current planned order recommendations 을 찾는다.
    3. User 2가 MRP Planned Workbench로 log
    4. User 2가 특정 planner code를 위한 current planned order recommendations 을 찾는다.
    5. User1은 All for Release를 선택
    6. User2도 All for Release를 선택
    7. User1은 checking process를 끝낸 후 저장
    8. User2는 아직 checking process를 끝내지 못해 save를 아지 않은 상태로 남아 있다.
    9. User1이 [Release] button을 선택
    10. User1이 [Release] button을 선택시 User1과 User2에 의해 저장되거나 check 된 모든 planned order recommendations이 Work in Process와
    Puchasing modules로 released 되어 버림
    Cause
    이 issue의 원인은 현재 MRP planning의 경우 expected functionality 이다.
    MRP Workbench Release process는 모든 planner에 의해 check 되거나 저장된 모든 planned orders를 항상 release 한다.
    Bug 891669 : Enhancement Request
    PLANNER'S WORKBENCH SHOULD RELEASE ORDERS BASED ON PLANNER NAME NOT BY BATCH
    It is explained that this is current functionality in the following rejected Enhancement Request:
    Bug 891669 : PLANNER'S WORKBENCH SHOULD RELEASE ORDERS BASED ON PLANNER NAME NOT BY BATCH
    Solution
    Solution을 적용하기 위해 아래 steps을 실행:
    1. 모든 planner에 의해 check 되거나 저장된 모든 planned orders가 [Release] button에 의해 항상 release 되는것은 현재 MRP Workbench
    Release process에서는 correct functionality 이다.
    2. ASCP Planning의 경우엔 Planner/User에 의해 Release process가 아래 option에 의해 처리 가능하다.
    -- profile MSC:Released Only By User
    -- Standard MRP에서는 이 option은 사용할 수 없고 고려되지 않는다.
    Reference
    Note 311053.1

  • 'Resource Usage' field in Planner workbench

    Hi,
    Currently the 'Resource Usage' field in Planner Workbench > Item > Routing Operation > Resources doesn't not display decimal places.
    What do I need to change in profile option or preference or anywhere else so that atleast 1 place after decimal is display. In the database column this field has data with decimal places.
    Thanks

    Hi Geert,
    Thanks for the advice.
    I put '1' decimal place in Capacity Plan but it didn't work. Then I entered same value in all decimal places in all tab in Preferences, then it worked.
    Thanks
    Dee

  • I need code to get Action Column in MPS Planner Workbench Supply form( R 12)

    Hi All,
    I need Code to get Action Column that available in Supply form of  MPS Planner Workbench .
    I need to have it in my report. we don't have Advanced Chain Installed.
    Thank you.

    Dear All,
    Kindly Support...

  • Mrp planner workbench inactive

    Hi All
    need help..
    Why suddenly my MRP Planner workbench is inactive?
    when I 've done running MRP. What processes can cause this?
    thanks.
    the pooh

    Hi,
    To understand more clearly, Please let me know below
    Able to navigate to workbench through Menu?
    Further, selecting the respective plan, are you able to select respecting plan workbench?
    Would like to know, whether you are not at all query in WB or able to query but getting empty result in WB?
    Thanks,
    Ram

  • How to make new item show in ASCP Plan workbench.

    Item ATT.BVL3AHY is a new item without any demand. At item master, it is set as Planned so it is collected by ASCP. The item can be found in msc.msc_system_items with Plan_id -1. Plan id -1 corresponds to Collection. Planner needs to manuallty add planned order for this item at ASCP workbench of plan WIRELINE (PLAN_ID 3002) as attached but as the item cannot be found in WIRELINE plan, planner cannot add it. Please let me know how to make this item show in WIRELINE Plan workbench.

    Run this query:
    select mrp_planning_code from msc_system_items where item_name like '<Item_Name>' and organization_id = <Org id> and plan_id = -1
    If this returns 7 you dont need to run any collections.
    If this returns other than 7 then,
    create a simulation set under Item Attributes Mass Maintenance and then update the attribute MRP Planning method for this item to MRP/MPP Planning. Assign Simulation set to plan name and then rerun the plan. It should work.
    If you are still facing an issue, then raise an SR with Oracle.

  • No Item for Requisition in ASCP Recommendation workbench tree...

    Dear expert,
    I am implementing ASCP unconstrain for OPM modul for make item that own purchased item for it's ingredient. I had setup the general planning atribute correctly for make item (Fin good) and buy item (raw mat). but when i launch the ascp plan, there is no recommendation for purchased item (no list at all) but the recommendation for work order is showing normally... can any body help? I am using R12.1
    regards
    indra.
    Edited by: Indra R Stp on Sep 6, 2010 6:14 PM

    Hi,
    Thanks a lot for your replies....Geert and Sandeep.
    I was just thinking what other standard ways I have to populate this information in the workbench for the Planners. Actually, it's just going to be a Yes/No or 1/0 info. for the planner which he would see in the workbench and then take some decision based on that. On exploring some of the other fields available in the Org items, I found that the workbench does display the planning flexfield info. such as Service level and Late Demands Penalty. Also there's another attribute 'Critical items' which populates a value 'Item Attribute' in the workbench when I check it in Org items and the field remains blank when I uncheck it in Org Items. The latter should always work as all my items are MPS Planned.
    Could there be any downsides if I use the Critical Items item attribute to pass this info for the Planner in the workbench?
    Regards,
    Abhijit

  • ASCP Collections Workbench Not displaying Resource Requirements

    Hello Experts,
    We are unable to see the resource requirements in Collections workbench. The data is available in msc_resource_requirements table and msc_net_resource_avail table.
    We are on 12.1.3 instance.
    Can you please help.
    Regards
    Sudeep

    Hi Kevin,
    Thanks for your update. Now I can able to see Item's description in workbench.
    Actually somebody have mistakenly deleted the decription field in the backend in the table MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B but the same item's dscription was present in MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_TL and thats how we found somebody have done this deletion manually from backend and not through the ITEM API.
    Now we have populated the description field in MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B and ran the standard collection and the same being shown in ASCP Workbench.
    Thanks for your inputs.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Bharathram.N

  • Expired Lot quantity incorrect in MRP Planner Workbench

    Hello,
    We have an issue with Expired Lots in the planer workbench.
    - We have an Expired Lot of material in quantity 5000 pcs.
    - In MRP, the system should create an "Expired Lot" demand of 5000 pcs to net out the expired lot quantity from the beginning on hand.
    - But, MRP creates an "Expired Lot" demand for only 4988 pcs.
    Has anyone seen this behavior before?
    Can anyone explain the logic of why the "Expired Lot" demand is only 4988 when the actual lot quantity is 5000?
    Or, am I facing another bug?
    Appreciate an advice.
    Thanks,
    Mark

    Hello,
    We have an issue with Expired Lots in the planer workbench.
    - We have an Expired Lot of material in quantity 5000 pcs.
    - In MRP, the system should create an "Expired Lot" demand of 5000 pcs to net out the expired lot quantity from the beginning on hand.
    - But, MRP creates an "Expired Lot" demand for only 4988 pcs.
    Has anyone seen this behavior before?
    Can anyone explain the logic of why the "Expired Lot" demand is only 4988 when the actual lot quantity is 5000?
    Or, am I facing another bug?
    Appreciate an advice.
    Thanks,
    Mark

  • SSD based on ATP rule is not coming correctly

    HI,
    We have issue with one of the item for which Sheduled ship date based on ATP is going out of planning horizon, eventhough we have supplies available for it.
    Issue in details:
    1. We are creating manual IR and ISO for that item, by giving need by date say 3-Jan-15, but the ISO is having the SSD outside the planning horizon.
    2. Checked for the available supply in ASCP planner workbench for the Org where ISO is getting booked and it is having enough supplies in the form of onhand, intransit shipments, planned orders. Checked for the onhand and it is pegged to Forecast demands and it is available to reserve and transact.
    3. Checked for the item attribute for this part no, it has check ATP value as 'Material Only'
    4. No ATP rule is defined in the item attribute for this item, also ATP component is having value as  'None'
    5. Checked for the MRP item attributes and it is End assembly/soft pegging
    6. Checked for the BOM and it has only single component in its BOM with the ATP flag unchecked for that component item in BOM and also at Org attribute level the ATP value is 'none' for component.
    I am not able to figure out the reason why the SSD is going out of planning horizon eventhough there is enough supplies aviable in the ATP enabled ASCP plan.
    Could you please help me for more checkpoints?
    Thanks,
    Avinash

    HI Abhishek,
    Thanks for the feedback, we have ATP results based on planning output. (Profile: INV:Capable to Promise=ATP/CTP Based on Planning output at site level)
    We can see many exception messages generated for this item in ATP enabled ASCP plan:
    1. Late supply pegged to Forecast
    2. Orders with compression days
    3. Past due Orders
    4. Orders to be rescheduled in
    5. Sourcing split percentage violated
    Please check below screenshot for the same:
    Also,
    this plan has demand scheduled attached as Forecast sets
    Thanks,
    Avinash

  • AP invoice workbench performance issue.

    Hi Guys,
    We have a production system with RHEL 5 ,R12 12.0.6 and DB:10.2.0.4
    WE are facing Performance issue in Inovoice workbench were users when click on Inovoice  batches or Inovoices it takes a lot of time to open the invoice form.
    Also Validation of inovoices consumes a lot of time which is unaccepted .
    Request you please give some pointers or note id to followd already have locked an SR with oracle .
    This is urgent
    Regards,
    Milan

    Please see these docs.
    R12 Invoice Workbench Form Has A Performance Issue [ID 1072338.1]
    Bad Performance When Checking Funds In Invoice Workbench [ID 1091280.1]
    Bad Performance In Invoice Workbench (APXINWKB) Find Window When Searching By Purchase Order [ID 1195623.1]
    R12 AP Invoice Workbench Performance Issues [ID 957105.1]
    Poor Performance On Invoice Validation In The Invoice Workbench [ID 1130313.1]
    Invoice Workbench> Actions: Pay in Full Performance Issue [ID 983804.1]
    Invoice Workbench (APXINWKB) Performance Issue While Selecting The Self Assessment Check Box [ID 1210340.1
    Performance of Project Expenditure LOV At AP Invoice Header in Invoice Workbench [ID 1143943.1]
    R12.1.1 Performance Problem in AP Invoice Workbench [ID 861205.1]
    R12 Invoice Performance FAQs [ID 579737.1]
    Thanks,
    Hussein

Maybe you are looking for