Performance problems after CS5 Trial install

I installed the CS5 Trial, performed updates to get everything current, and InDesign and Illustrator have slowed to a crawl. For example, click on a text block, shift-click to select a second block and wait 2-3 seconds. Or, single-click an object to select, wait a few seconds and it jumps to another place on the page.
Also, PDFs opened in Acrobat Professional 8 are being affected. Flipping through pages takes 10-ish seconds per page.
And last, when I go back to using CS3, I'm having similar problems there, which I didn't have before. Not quite as slow, but still a problem.
I have restarted many times, and also uninstalled CS5 and reinstalled.
Has anyone experienced this? Suggestions?

Similar Messages

Cannot launch 2004mx apps after CS5 trial install

Urgernt help please.
Running 10.5.8 and after recently downloading adobe cs5 suite can no longer launch my 2004mx apps. Uninstalled cs5 trial and now cannot reinstall 2004xmx as installer fails to launch.
Suggestions greatly apprecaited

Since this is the Installation and Setup forum for Mac OS X v10.6 (Snow Leopard), it isn't a good place to post questions about issues with OS X 10.5 (Leopard) & third party applications.
I suggest you post to Adobe's support forums or check Adobe's FAQ's & such.

I previously had PS CS5 Trial installed but removed it using both Control Panel Programs and deleting all files from the CS5 directory on Program Files. I then installed a purchased product from Adobe disc using the serial number on the case. But when I

I previously had PS CS5 Trial installed but removed it using both Control Panel Programs and deleting all files from the CS5 directory on Program Files. I then installed a purchased product from Adobe disc using the serial number on the case. But when I try to launch it, I get a screen headed Photoshop CS5 Extended Trial. It asks for the serial number and says that my trial has expired. It rejects the serial number from the Adobe case saying "This Serial Number is not valid for this product". It thinks that I still have the expired Trial Version installed. How do I convince it (the program) that the Trial Version is long gone and the currently installed product was installed with a valid and accepted serial number????

Let me know how it goes. Go into your Adobe account and register your serial number asap.
https://www.adobe.com/account/my-products-services.html
That way, should you lose it or you need support, it is on record that it's yours and you can fetch your s/n it from anywhere.
There are too may sad stories here, where people forgot and the box is buried or lost.
Gene

Printing Problems after Reader 10 install

Recently deployed Reader 10 to about 300 workstations using Group Policy. Several machines are no longer able to print to some of the network printers. These printers are HP printers using the Universal Print Driver. When trying to print we get an error and the Adobe Reader application crashes. It will however print to other network printers that are using an older device specific driver, printing to the same print device. Have downloaded the latest HP driver, but it has not helped the situation. The printing worked fine with Reader 8 and Reader 9.   Anyone with an Idea?

Sorry only know Windows: Edit (menu)>Preferences>General>Application Startup>Enable Protected Mode at startup.
Wayne Capra
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:37:59 -0600
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Printing Problems after Reader 10 install
    Re: Printing Problems after Reader 10 install
    created by Al1iOop in Adobe Reader - View the full discussion
I am using a Mac 10.6 and cannot find the "Enable protected mode at startup" in General or any other options. Does anyone have an answer for Macs? Thanks.
     Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page: http://forums.adobe.com/message/3991540#3991540
     To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at http://forums.adobe.com/message/3991540#3991540. In the Actions box on the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
     Start a new discussion in Adobe Reader by email or at Adobe Forums
For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to http://forums.adobe.com/message/2936746#2936746.

Adobe CS5 Trial Install Problem

I have tried to install the Adobe Photoshop CS5 trial, but it always comes up with this error, and says Photoshop failed to install, even after reaching 100%.
Here are my specs:
Windows XP Home Edition Service Pack 3
Enclosure Type: Desktop
2.30 gigahertz AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core
256 kilobyte primary memory cache
512 kilobyte secondary memory cache
Board: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. M61P-S3
Bus Clock: 200 megahertz
750.15 Gigabytes Usable Hard Drive Capacity
665.13 Gigabytes Hard Drive Free Space
Radeon X1600/X1650 Series [Display adapter]
Radeon X1600/X1650 Series Secondary [Display adapter]
And here is what error log I get:
Exit Code: 6
-------------------------------------- Summary --------------------------------------
- 1 fatal error(s), 4 error(s), 2 warning(s)
WARNING: The payload: Adobe Photoshop CS5 Core {7DFEBBA4-81E1-425B-BBAA-06E9E5BBD97E} requires a UI parent with following specification:
    Family: Photoshop
    ProductName: Adobe Photoshop CS5 Core_x64
    This parent relationship is not satisfied, because this payload is not present in this session.
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
ERROR: Payload {1D830E80-28A4-11DF-A025-0024E8692489} has an action "install" but no resultState
ERROR: The following payload errors were found during install:
ERROR: - Adobe Photoshop CS5 Core: Failed due to Language Pack installation failure
ERROR: - Adobe Photoshop CS5 International English Language Pack_AdobePhotoshop12-en_GB: Install failed
FATAL ERROR: Cannot create extract assets at 'C:\Program Files\Common Files\Adobe\Installers\adobeTemp\{7DFEBBA4-81E1-425B-BBAA-06E9E5BBD97E}' from zip file 'C:\Documents and Settings\Mark\Desktop\Adobe CS5\Photoshop\Adobe CS5\payloads\AdobePhotoshop12-Core\Assets1_1.zip'. Error 0
If anyone from Adobe is reading this, please pause my trial. I have an email saying my 30 days has started, but the program isn't even installed yet.
Anyone know how to fix this?

If anyone from Adobe is reading this, please pause my trial.
It's not possible, so forget about it. As for the rest - reinstall Service Pack 3 and possibly other components like the MSInstaller runtime, .NET runtimes or even MS visual Studio 2010 Express. You have something with your DLLs being wrong and hence the installer is messing up operating system detection. Additioanlly, apply any AMD-specific patches and update all your drivers, this is also critical.
Mylenium

Performance problems after installing XP Service Pack 3

Hello,
After upgrading my client XP-machine to Service Pack 3, I have serious performance issues working with ApEx. Firstly, establishing the connection to the ApEx Workspace and then logging in both are very slow. Navigating through the workspace works fine, however when I then open any page for editing and/or try to run it, again it is very slow. As we work with PL/sql Embedded gateway I have changed the parameter SHARED_SERVERS to 10, but this did not make any difference. Remotely connecting to this server in other ways such as ping, connecting to xmlpserver, mapping network drives and connecting to the database all work fine.
My collegues also working witk Service Pack 3 have no performance issues. However when I performed a rollback of the XP Service Pack 3, the performance issue was gone!
Does anyone know of any issues similar to this problem?
Regards,
Ben van Dort

This issue is probably related to an update of InternetExplorer by Service Pack 3. Working with Firefox instead of IE gives no performance problems whatsoever.
Version of IE after Service Pack 3: 6.0.2900.5512.xpsp_sp3_gdr.080814-1236CO
Ben

Performance problems after EHP4

Hello,
We have a small problem.
After installing EHP4 for ERP and EHP1 for Netweaver 7 on AIX Oracle installation, an increase in dialog response time is reported.
We upgraded last September 2009, and from then and to now, we have gone from an average of 800ms to 1200ms in dialog response time.
When we analyze transactions, there is no specific transaction that is the cause, it looks more like an allover trend, that the system in general has become slower.
When we look at fx. Earlywatch reports, it is quit obvious, that the u201Cproblemsu201D started just after implementing the EHP.
We are attacking this on several fronts, and I am looking on the sap basis part.
I was not a part of the upgrade team, so what I am looking into, is weather maybe some notes has been forgotten or something else. I am especially interested in notes and steps that should have been performed on Oracle, in connection with the EHP upgrade.
Is there anybody in here that have experienced similar problems, after applying EHPs?
Best Regards,
Kenneth
Edited by: Kenneth Nielsen on Jan 22, 2010 9:45 AM

Hi Kenneth,
In which area that you are having much interval in total rsponse time? If it is looking under DB time may be cause with Oracle bug fixes..check your all Oracle patches(mainly related to performance).
And explore the DB version and patch list that presently you had.
Regards,
Nick Loy

Exit Code: 6, Ps Cs5 trial install.

hi, ive downloaded the trial of Photoshop Cs5 but it wont install, i get to about 10% in the install and then i get "Exit Code: 6".
ill begin with my system specs:
(Swedish language) Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 2.40GHz 2.39GHz
4GB Ram
Ati Radeon x1950xTx
Asus P5B deluxe motherboard
1680x1050 Acer P223w screen.
i've cleaned my regestry for problems with "Glarysoft Regestry repair", disabled my ESET NOD32 anti-vir, ran the setup as Administrator, choose to install as trial but i get to about 10% and i get Exit Code: 6.
this is what the log file said:
Exit Code: 6
-------------------------------------- Summary --------------------------------------
- 0 fatal error(s), 58 error(s), 58 warning(s)
WARNING: OS requirements not met for {667C8B6C-3EAF-4646-A8EC-D85CCC4D3D84}
WARNING: OS requirements not met for {7DFEBBA4-81E1-425B-BBAA-06E9E5BBD97E}
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
ERROR: The following payload errors were found during install:
ERROR: - Adobe CSXS Infrastructure CS5: Install failed
ERROR: - Microsoft_VC90_ATL_x86: Install failed
ERROR: - Adobe Media Player: Install failed
ERROR: - Adobe Linguistics CS5 x64: Install failed
ERROR: - Adobe Photoshop CS5 Support: Install failed
ERROR: - Adobe Bridge CS5: Install failed
ERROR: - Microsoft_VC80_ATL_x86: Install failed
ERROR: - Recommended Common Fonts Installation x64: Install failed
ERROR: - AdobePDFL x64 CS5: Install failed
ERROR: - DeviceCentral_DeviceCentral3LP-en_GB: Install failed
ERROR: - Microsoft_VC80_MFCLOC_x86_x64: Install failed
ERROR: - Adobe XMP Panels CS5: Install failed
ERROR: - Photoshop Camera Raw: Install failed
ERROR: - AdobeColorCommonSetCMYK: Install failed
ERROR: - Adobe Mini Bridge CS5: Install failed
ERROR: - Microsoft_VC80_CRT_x86_x64: Install failed
ERROR: - AdobeColorJA CS5: Install failed
ERROR: - Adobe ReviewPanel CS5: Install failed
ERROR: - Photoshop Camera Raw (64 bit): Install failed
ERROR: - Microsoft_VC90_MFC_x86: Install failed
ERROR: - Adobe Photoshop CS5 Core_x64: Failed due to Language Pack installation failure
ERROR: - Suite Shared Configuration CS5: Install failed
ERROR: - Adobe Linguistics CS5: Install failed
ERROR: - PDF Settings CS5: Install failed
ERROR: - DeviceCentral: Failed due to Language Pack installation failure
ERROR: - AdobeTypeSupport CS5: Install failed
ERROR: - AdobeColorVideoProfilesCS CS5: Install failed
ERROR: - AdobeColorCommonSetRGB: Install failed
ERROR: - Adobe Player for Embedding x64: Install failed
ERROR: - Adobe Photoshop CS5 Core: Failed due to Language Pack installation failure
ERROR: - Required Common Fonts Installation x64: Install failed
ERROR: - Microsoft_VC90_ATL_x86_x64: Install failed
ERROR: - Adobe Photoshop CS5 International English Language Pack_AdobePhotoshop12-en_GB: Install failed
ERROR: - Adobe CSXS Extensions CS5: Install failed
ERROR: - Microsoft_VC80_ATL_x86_x64: Install failed
ERROR: - AdobeOutputModule: Install failed
ERROR: - Microsoft_VC80_CRT_x86: Install failed
ERROR: - AdobeCMaps x64 CS5: Install failed
ERROR: - AdobeTypeSupport x64 CS5: Install failed
ERROR: - Microsoft_VC90_MFC_x86_x64: Install failed
ERROR: - Adobe Photoshop CS5 International English Language Pack_x64_AdobePhotoshop12-en_GB_x64: Install failed
ERROR: - Adobe WinSoft Linguistics Plugin CS5: Install failed
ERROR: - Adobe WinSoft Linguistics Plugin CS5 x64: Install failed
ERROR: - AdobeColorEU CS5: Install failed
ERROR: - AdobePDFL CS5: Install failed
ERROR: - AdobeCMaps CS5: Install failed
ERROR: - AdobeColorNA CS5: Install failed
ERROR: - Microsoft_VC80_MFC_x86_x64: Install failed
ERROR: - Required Common Fonts Installation: Install failed
ERROR: - Adobe SwitchBoard 2.0: Install failed
ERROR: - Microsoft_VC80_MFC_x86: Install failed
ERROR: - AdobeColorPhotoshop CS5: Install failed
ERROR: - Microsoft_VC80_MFCLOC_x86: Install failed
ERROR: - Recommended Common Fonts Installation: Install failed
ERROR: - Adobe Extension Manager CS5: Install failed
ERROR: - Adobe ExtendScript Toolkit CS5: Install failed
ERROR: - Adobe AIR: Install failed
Help would be much appriciated
/Andreas

Here's m system info: Adobe Photoshop Version: 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch]) x32
Operating System: Windows 7 64-bit
Version: 6.1
System architecture: Intel CPU Family:6, Model:15, Stepping:13 with MMX, SSE Integer, SSE FP, SSE2, SSE3
Physical processor count: 2
Processor speed: 1828 MHz
Built-in memory: 3070 MB
Free memory: 1458 MB
Memory available to Photoshop: 2556 MB
Memory used by Photoshop: 60 %
Image tile size: 128K
Image cache levels: 4
OpenGL Drawing: Enabled.
OpenGL Drawing Mode: Normal
OpenGL Allow Normal Mode: True.
OpenGL Allow Advanced Mode: False.
OpenGL Crash File: Not Detected.
OpenGL Allow Old GPUs: Not Detected.
Video Card Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
Video Card Renderer: GeForce 8600M GT/PCI/SSE2
Display: 1
Display Bounds:= top: 0, left: 0, bottom: 900, right: 1440
Video Card Number: 1
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
Driver Version: 8.17.11.9716
Driver Date: 20100316000000.000000-000
Video Card Driver: nvd3dumx.dll,nvwgf2umx.dll,nvwgf2umx.dll,nvd3dum,nvwgf2um,nvwgf2um
Video Mode: 1440 x 900 x 4294967296 colors
Video Card Caption: NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
Video Card Memory: 256 MB
Serial number: Tryout Version
Application folder: C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS5\
Temporary file path: C:\Users\PHILIP~1\AppData\Local\Temp\
Photoshop scratch has async I/O enabled
Scratch volume(s):
Startup, 462.7G, 382.8G free
Primary Plug-ins folder: C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS5\Plug-ins\
Additional Plug-ins folder: not set
Installed components:
   A3DLIBS.dll   A3DLIB Dynamic Link Library   9.2.0.112
   ACE.dll   ACE 2010/03/10-08:31:04   61.423599   61.423599
   adbeape.dll   Adobe APE 2010/02/23-12:40:58   61.421986   61.421986
   AdobeLinguistic.dll   Adobe Linguisitc Library   5.0.0
   AdobeOwl.dll   Adobe Owl 2010/03/29-17:44:28   3.0.91   61.425789
   AdobeOwlCanvas.dll   Adobe Owl Canvas   3.0.68   61.2954
   AdobePDFL.dll   PDFL 2010/03/04-10:02:26   61.281542   61.281542
   AdobePIP.dll   Adobe Product Improvement Program   5.0.0.2021
   AdobeXMP.dll   Adobe XMP Core   5.0   61.134777
   AdobeXMPFiles.dll   Adobe XMP Files   5.0   61.134777
   AdobeXMPScript.dll   Adobe XMP Script   5.0   61.134777
   adobe_caps.dll   Adobe CAPS   3,0,116,0
   adobe_OOBE_Launcher.dll   Adobe OOBE Launcher   1.0.0.64 (BuildVersion: 1.0; BuildDate: Mon Jan 26 2010 21:49:00)   1.000000
   AFlame.dll   AFlame 2010/02/23-17:27:33   61.421976   61.421976
   AFlamingo.dll   AFlamingo 2010/02/23-17:27:33   61.421978   61.421978
   AGM.dll   AGM 2010/03/10-08:31:04   61.423599   61.423599
   ahclient.dll    AdobeHelp Dynamic Link Library   1,5,0,30
   aif_core.dll   AIF   2.0   53.422628
   aif_ogl.dll   AIF   2.0   53.422628
   amtlib.dll   AMTLib   3.0.0.64 (BuildVersion: 3.0; BuildDate: Mon Jan 26 2010 21:49:00)   1.000000
   amtservices.dll   AMTServices   3.0.0.64 (BuildVersion: 3.0; BuildDate: Mon Jan 26 2010 21:49:00)   1.000000
   ARE.dll   ARE 2010/03/10-08:31:04   61.423599   61.423599
   asneu.dll    AsnEndUser Dynamic Link Library   1, 7, 0, 1
   AXE8SharedExpat.dll   AXE8SharedExpat 2010/02/23-17:27:33   61.421978   61.421978
   AXEDOMCore.dll   AXEDOMCore 2010/02/23-17:27:33   61.421978   61.421978
   Bib.dll   BIB 2010/03/10-08:31:04   61.423599   61.423599
   BIBUtils.dll   BIBUtils 2010/03/10-08:31:04   61.423599   61.423599
   boost_threads.dll   DVA Product   5.0.0
   cg.dll   NVIDIA Cg Runtime   2.0.0015
   cgGL.dll   NVIDIA Cg Runtime   2.0.0015
   CoolType.dll   CoolType 2010/03/10-08:31:04   61.423599   61.423599
   data_flow.dll   AIF   2.0   53.422628
   dvaadameve.dll   DVA Product   5.0.0
   dvacore.dll   DVA Product   5.0.0
   dvaui.dll   DVA Product   5.0.0
   ExtendScript.dll   ExtendScript 2010/03/05-08:21:15   61.423205   61.423205
   FileInfo.dll   Adobe XMP FileInfo   5.0   61.134777
   icucnv36.dll   International Components for Unicode 2009/06/17-13:21:03    Build gtlib_main.9896
   icudt36.dll   International Components for Unicode 2009/06/17-13:21:03    Build gtlib_main.9896
   image_flow.dll   AIF   2.0   53.422628
   image_runtime.dll   AIF   2.0   53.422628
   JP2KLib.dll   JP2KLib 2010/02/24-17:43:58   61.131544   61.131544
   libeay32.dll   The OpenSSL Toolkit   0.9.8g
   libifcoremd.dll   Intel(r) Visual Fortran Compiler   10.0 (Update A)
   libmmd.dll   Intel(r) C Compiler, Intel(r) C++ Compiler, Intel(r) Fortran Compiler   10.0
   LogSession.dll   LogSession   2, 0, 1, 11
   MPS.dll   MPS 2010/02/24-17:43:58   61.421978   61.421978
   msvcm80.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2005   8.00.50727.4927
   msvcm90.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2008   9.00.30729.4926
   msvcp71.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio .NET   7.10.3077.0
   msvcp80.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2005   8.00.50727.4927
   msvcp90.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2008   9.00.30729.4926
   msvcr71.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio .NET   7.10.3052.4
   msvcr80.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2005   8.00.50727.4927
   msvcr90.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2008   9.00.30729.4926
   pdfsettings.dll   Adobe PDFSettings   1.04
   Photoshop.dll   Adobe Photoshop CS5   CS5
   Plugin.dll   Adobe Photoshop CS5   CS5
   PlugPlug.dll   Adobe(R) CSXS PlugPlug Standard Dll (32 bit)   2.0.0.746
   PSArt.dll   Adobe Photoshop CS5   CS5
   PSViews.dll   Adobe Photoshop CS5   CS5
   SCCore.dll   ScCore 2010/03/05-08:21:15   61.423205   61.423205
   shfolder.dll   Microsoft(R) Windows (R) 2000 Operating System   5.50.4027.300
   ssleay32.dll   The OpenSSL Toolkit   0.9.8g
   tbb.dll   Threading Building Blocks   2, 1, 2009, 0201
   TfFontMgr.dll   FontMgr   9.3.0.113
   TfKernel.dll   Kernel   9.3.0.113
   TFKGEOM.dll   Kernel Geom   9.3.0.113
   TFUGEOM.dll   Adobe, UGeom©   9.3.0.113
   updaternotifications.dll   Adobe Updater Notifications Library   1.0.0.64 (BuildVersion: 1.0; BuildDate: BUILDDATETIME)   1.0.0.64
   WRServices.dll   WRServices Thursday January 21 2010 12:13:3   Build 0.11423   0.11423
   wu3d.dll   U3D Writer   9.3.0.113
Installed plug-ins:
   3D Studio 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Accented Edges 12.0
   ADM 3.11x01
   Angled Strokes 12.0
   Average 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Bas Relief 12.0
   BMP 12.0
   Camera Raw 6.0
   Chalk & Charcoal 12.0
   Charcoal 12.0
   Chrome 12.0
   Cineon 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Clouds 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Collada 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Color Halftone 12.0
   Colored Pencil 12.0
   CompuServe GIF 12.0
   Conté Crayon 12.0
   Craquelure 12.0
   Crop and Straighten Photos 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Crop and Straighten Photos Filter 12.0
   Crosshatch 12.0
   Crystallize 12.0
   Cutout 12.0
   Dark Strokes 12.0
   De-Interlace 12.0
   Dicom 12.0
   Difference Clouds 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Diffuse Glow 12.0
   Displace 12.0
   Dry Brush 12.0
   Embed Watermark 4.0
   Entropy 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Extrude 12.0
   FastCore Routines 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Fibers 12.0
   Film Grain 12.0
   Filter Gallery 12.0
   Fresco 12.0
   Glass 12.0
   Glowing Edges 12.0
   Google Earth 4 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Grain 12.0
   Graphic Pen 12.0
   Halftone Pattern 12.0
   HDRMergeUI 12.0
   IFF Format 12.0
   Ink Outlines 12.0
   JPEG 2000 2.0
   Kurtosis 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Lens Blur 12.0
   Lens Correction 12.0
   Lens Flare 12.0
   Lighting Effects 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Liquify 12.0
   Matlab Operation 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Maximum 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Mean 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Measurement Core 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Median 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Mezzotint 12.0
   Minimum 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   MMXCore Routines 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Mosaic Tiles 12.0
   Multiprocessor Support 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Neon Glow 12.0
   Note Paper 12.0
   NTSC Colors 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Ocean Ripple 12.0
   OpenEXR 12.0
   Paint Daubs 12.0
   Palette Knife 12.0
   Patchwork 12.0
   Paths to Illustrator 12.0
   PCX 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Photocopy 12.0
   Photoshop 3D Engine 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Picture Package Filter 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Pinch 12.0
   Pixar 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Plaster 12.0
   Plastic Wrap 12.0
   PNG 12.0
   Pointillize 12.0
   Polar Coordinates 12.0
   Portable Bit Map 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Poster Edges 12.0
   Radial Blur 12.0
   Radiance 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Range 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Read Watermark 4.0
   Reticulation 12.0
   Ripple 12.0
   Rough Pastels 12.0
   Save for Web & Devices 12.0
   ScriptingSupport 12.0
   Send Video Preview to Device 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Shear 12.0
   Skewness 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Smart Blur 12.0
   Smudge Stick 12.0
   Solarize 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Spatter 12.0
   Spherize 12.0
   Sponge 12.0
   Sprayed Strokes 12.0
   Stained Glass 12.0
   Stamp 12.0
   Standard Deviation 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Sumi-e 12.0
   Summation 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Targa 12.0
   Texturizer 12.0
   Tiles 12.0
   Torn Edges 12.0
   Twirl 12.0
   U3D 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Underpainting 12.0
   Vanishing Point 12.0
   Variance 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Variations 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Video Preview 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Water Paper 12.0
   Watercolor 12.0
   Wave 12.0
   Wavefront|OBJ 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   WIA Support 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   Wind 12.0
   Wireless Bitmap 12.0 (12.0x20100407 [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r branch])
   ZigZag 12.0
Plug-ins that failed to load: NONE
Flash:
   Flash
   Mini Bridge
   Access CS Live
   CS News and Resources
   Flash
   Kuler
   CS Review
Installed TWAIN devices: NONE

3D performance problems after upgrading memory

I recently purchased an additional 2GB of memory to try and extend the life of my aging computer. I installed the memory yesterday and Windows seems to recognize it (reporting now 3.3GB) but when I dropped into WoW (pretty much the only game I have) the 3D performance was down from the usual 60FPS @ 1600x1080 to a bleak 20 (at best) and the CPU utilization went to about 80% on both cores (with ~20% kernel usages). Basically WoW was being software 3D rendered!!!
I went through the usual reinstall drivers, reboot, etc... and couldn't find a fix. I powered down, pulled out 2 of the memory sticks, booted up, and dropped into WoW - it ran at the full 60FPS and CPU utilization was very low (i.e. back to GPU Hardware 3D rendering). I powered down again, swapped the 2 sticks for the other 2 sticks, booted up, and dropped into WoW - again it ran 100% fine. So I powered down, put all four sticks in, booted back up, and when I dropped into WoW it was running in the software 3D rendering mode (20FPS at best and High CPU/Kernel usage).
I've tried the /PAE option in boot.ini - no joy. I've tried /MAXMEM = to 3300, 3072, 3000, and even 2048 - no joy in any of those cases. Has anyone seen anything like this before? Or have suggestions to fix (other than going to Win7-64)?
All info in signature is up to date.
Thanks in advance for any help!

Quote
Well his last post was a little over 6 hours ago so he was up pretty late.
Looks like nothing one does in here goes completely unnoticed.
Anyway, I am done sleeping now.
Quote
his 2 Pfennig's worth. I know, I know it's Euro's now.
Yeah, and what used to be "Pfennige" is now also called "Cents" and here are mine:
Quote
I've tried the /PAE option in boot.ini - no joy. I've tried /MAXMEM = to 3300, 3072, 3000, and even 2048 - no joy in any of those cases. Has anyone seen anything like this before? Or have suggestions to fix (other than going to Win7-64)?
PAE or Physical Memory Extension will not do anything as Microsoft has castrated this feature to such an extend that it has nothing to do with memory addressing anymore when in comes to Windows XP:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_Address_Extension#Microsoft_Windows
Quote
Windows XP Service Pack 2 and later, by default, on processors with the no-execute (NX) or execute-disable (XD) feature, runs in PAE mode in order to allow NX. The NX (or XD) bit resides in bit 63 of the page table entry and, without PAE, page table entries only have 32 bits; therefore PAE mode is required if the NX feature is to be exploited. However, desktop versions of Windows (Windows XP, Windows Vista) limit physical address space to 4 GiB for driver compatibility reasons.
The feature is already automatically enabled. But since is original function (Address Extension) does no longer exist when it comes to the desktop versions of Windows XP, it won't really do anything you would ever notice.
About the /MAXMEM Switch: In Windows 32bit operating systems, every process is limited to 2GB of memory. The point of the switch is to allow certain applications (or their run-time process) to occupy a higher amount of system memory than 2GB. However, the culprit here is that only those applications are able to utilize this ability that have been programmed (or compiled) accordingly. A special flag (large memory aware) has to be implemented. Otherwise, these application will be restricted to 2GB even though the /MAXMEM Switch has been set to extend the 2GB limit to 3GB. Most 32bit applications come without the "large memory aware" flag and that is why usually, settings the switch won't change anything.
In any case, it is unlikely that /PAE (even if it would not be castrated) and /MAXMEM would have an impact on your actual issue because I doubt that it has much to do with either memory adressing or the memory limit of an indiviual Windows process.
Quote
the 3D performance was down from the usual 60FPS @ 1600x1080 to a bleak 20 (at best) and the CPU utilization went to about 80% on both cores (with ~20% kernel usages).
There are a couple of hardware based explanations to consider here. Let's start with the most obvious one:
1. 975X Memory Controller
The main reason that the system chooses to automatically set the Memory Speed to DDR2-667 even though DDR2-800 modules are installed, is that by design the memory controller of the Intel 975X Chipset does not natively support DDR2-800 modules, but
>>Intel® 975X Express Chipset Datasheet - For the Intel® 82975X Memory Controller Hub (MCH)<< [Page 20]
This means, that from the point of view of the memory controller, operating the memory @DDR2-800 actually means overclocking it (with all potential side effects).
Basically, if your initial problem disappears as soon as you reduce the memory speed to DDR2-667, the design limitation of the memory controller may explain your findings.
2. Different memory modules
If I read your signature correctly, you are actually mixing two different kits/models of RAM (CM2X1024-6400C4DHX and CM2X1024-6400C4). This can work of course, but in practice it not necessarely does under all circumstances.
This list (-> http://ramlist.i4memory.com/ddr2/) indicates that there are at least 14 different module types/revisions of Corsair DDR2-800 / CL4 modules that utilize a wide range of different memory chips (Elpida, ProMos, Micron, Infinion, Powerchip, Qimonda, Samsung, Infinion etc.). Even though the superficial specifications for these chips appear to be pretty similar (DDR2-800 / CL5 / CL4), this does not necessarely mean that the modules will respond to the same operating conditions in the same way. There may be small difference in sub-timings/sub-latencies and/or the general responsiveness of the ICs which may affect the operating behaviour of the memory controller (which by the way also includes the PCI-Express interface which your video card is hooked up to).
And again: If running the system @DDR2-667 solves your issue, the possible explanation is that higher clock speeds may amplify (or trigger) potential performance problems that could have to do with the use of non-identical memory modules.
Furthermore: It is also possible that the memory controller's design limitations and the potential compatibility problems that may be attributed to mixing different modules types may reinforce each other in terms of reduced system performance.
3. The BIOS may have an impact as well
There has been known issue with the use of certain video cards in conjunction with 4GB of system memory on this mainboard:
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=107301.0
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=105955.0
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=99818.msg798951#msg798951
What may have come out as graphics/display corruption in earlier BIOS Releases may come out as reduced system performance when using the latest BIOS Release. Of course, this is hard to prove, but I thought I'd mention it anyway. May I ask what amount of video memory your card has onboard?
Fortunately, there is a BIOS version that you could consider to try in this matter. It is not only the last BIOS Release that could be used in order to avoid the corruption issue, but it is (in my oppionion) the best BIOS Version that was ever released for the 975X Platinum PUE Mainboard: W7246IMS.716 [v7.1b6]. I have been using this mainboard for almost two years and have tested almost every BIOS Release that ever came out and I always went back to v7.1b6 as "ground zero".
It will properly support your E6600 (so you don't have to worry about that) and as far as I remember, there are no known compatibility issues with other components. So maybe, you want to give this a shot.
The bottom line is that in a worst case scenario, the problem you describe could be caused by all of the above things at the same time. You cannot really do anything about the 975X Chipset Specifications and the only way to rule out explanation #2 is to test modules that are actually identical (same model number, revision and memory chips). A test of the 7.1b6 BIOS Release is something you should consider. It may be the only way to test the BIOS Hypothesis.
This post turned out to be longer than I intended, but then again, I am well-rested after a good sleep and the wake-up coffee is kicking in pretty good.

Performance Problems PrPro CS5 - Upgrade to CS6?

Hi
we often notice massive performance problems with PrPro CS5 here.
e.g. last week we were shooting with a Sony NEX-VG10. (MediaInfo:)
Format: AVC
Format profile: [email protected]
Format settings, CABAC: Yes
Format settings, ReFrames: 2 frames
Format settings, GOP: M=2, N=13
Bit rate: 16.0 Mbps
Width: 1 920 pixels
Height: 1 080 pixels
Display aspect ratio: 16:9
Frame rate: 25 fps
After linking footage into PrPro plaback stutters.
PrPro is very often not responsive to the keyboard at all.
Sometimes PrPro needs some seconds before playback starts.
This way editing is a pain...
No fx in timeline, only one or two clips. Same behaviour if I play a clip in the source window.
Project and sequence settings are correct. Playback quality set to 1/4.
These problems occure in several projects with footage from different cameras.
PrPro works ok with this (PAL/SD-)footage for example - MediaInfo:
Format: DV
Commercial name: DVCPRO
Width: 720 pixels
Height: 576 pixels
Display aspect ratio: 16:9
About the computer:
Dell Precision WorkStation T5500
24 GB RAM
2 processors w/ 8 cores together: Intel Xeon CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz
System: 250 GB (SSD)
Media: 2 TB (this is one normal internal hard drive, no raid)
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 (driver version 297.03)
connected to internet (is a must in this company)
connected to intranet, server (is a must in this company, too)
optimized for performance
windows firewall active
AVIRA Porfessional
What would PrPro force to work with HD footage?
Add an RAID? internal/external?
Upgrade to CS6?
Edncode footage to another codec before linking it into PrPro? (which codec? encode with AME?)
Buy a new processor? (i7? which one?)
Buy any Hardware pieces?
TIA for your guidiance and best regards.

Take a look at the Dell T7400 currently at rank # 568, 'Base2008PT1' on Benchmark Results. It is somewhat similar to your own system, but has more memory, a better video card and some raid0 arrays. Nevertheless, it is around 3.4 times slower than a fast system. My guess is that your system is even slower.
The material you try to edit is very demanding and requires a beefy computer. Even though there is nothing wrong with the dual Xeon E5620's, their clock speed works against you (I have the same CPU's in a file server, but that is far less demanding than editing), as does the amount of memory in the system. You can be helped with more disks, but don't expect miraculous performance improvements. But all little things help.
The alternative is a complete new system, but that can be pricey. Even if you build it yourself, see Planning & Building a NLE system it can be costly. It gives you very fast performance as demonstrated on the Reflections page and you should not get such a system from Dell or HP, unless you have unlimited funds.

Serious performance problems after updating from 10.5.6 to 10.5.7

I've got a Macbook Pro C2D 15" (late 2006). After updating the system from 10.5.6 to 10.5.7 and quicktime to 7.6.2, I experience serious performance problems which I have never seen before:
-From time to time, kernel_task has peaks in activity monitor (consumes a lot of CPU). In that moment, the mouse hangs for a short moment and audio playback is distorted/has drop outs.
-Recording audio consumes a lot of CPU (independent of the audio application).
-Video playback consumes a lot of CPU, regardless if I use VLC or the quicktime player.
Any idea what could be done? Thanks in advance.

After a few days of using CoolBook I report that my 1st generation MacBook Air is now reliable and never overheating, regardless of environment conditions.
I must point out that I do believe that it really is something new in 10.5.7 that is causing this problem as my environmental conditions have not changed and even Summer in Dublin still sees temperatures no more than 72F/22C. I am now in Madrid, where the environment is quite different, and I am still having no problem with kernel_task spinning.
I plan on reporting my problem to Apple anyway and being aggressive about the issue as MacLovinRanga did in this thread (http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=9647353#9647353). Perhaps many/all of those of us having this problem will obtain new MacBook Airs.
Joe Kiniry

CS5 Trial Install error

I downloaded a trial of photoshop cs5 and when I go to install the trail it first warns me of a "pending restart" which i can ignore and continue or close and do a restart as recommended (which I tried). If I attempt to continue with the installation it tells me it failed. This is the error log below (it's big). Let me know if you want more information. Im running windows 7 32-bit by the way.
Exit Code: 6
-------------------------------------- Summary --------------------------------------
- 0 fatal error(s), 46 error(s), 45 warning(s)
WARNING: DW024: The payload: Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Core {08EF22BC-43B2-4B4E-BA12-52B18F418F38} requires a UI parent with following specification:
Family: Photoshop
ProductName: Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Core_x64
This parent relationship is not satisfied, because this payload is not present in this session.
WARNING: DW031: Payload:{3F023875-4A52-4605-9DB6-A88D4A813E8D} Camera Profiles Installer 6.0.0.0 has been updated and has been selected for repair. The patch {A189C479-C7CD-4E08-8CCF-D999B68C0C71} Camera Profiles Installer_6.3_AdobeCameraRawProfile6.0All 6.3.0.0 will be uninstalled now.
WARNING: DW031: Payload:{3F023875-4A52-4605-9DB6-A88D4A813E8D} Camera Profiles Installer 6.0.0.0 has been updated and has been selected for repair. The patch {A189C479-C7CD-4E08-8CCF-D999B68C0C71} Camera Profiles Installer_6.3_AdobeCameraRawProfile6.0All 6.3.0.0 will be uninstalled now.
----------- Payload: {08D2E121-7F6A-43EB-97FD-629B44903403} Microsoft_VC90_CRT_x86 1.0.0.0 -----------
ERROR: Error 1935.An error occurred during the installation of assembly component {43CC1B37-B20C-3EBC-9C04-F809989E4FD3}. HRESULT: 0x8007054F.
ERROR: Install MSI payload failed with error: 1603 - Fatal error during installation.
MSI Error message: Error 1935.An error occurred during the installation of assembly component {43CC1B37-B20C-3EBC-9C04-F809989E4FD3}. HRESULT: 0x8007054F.
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
----------- Payload: {D1B83970-7269-48BE-8B0E-5120D9327E52} Adobe Player for Embedding 3.1 3.101.0.0 -----------
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
----------- Payload: {A189C479-C7CD-4E08-8CCF-D999B68C0C71} Camera Profiles Installer_6.3_AdobeCameraRawProfile6.0All 6.3.0.0 -----------
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
----------- Payload: {7EABC54B-02C3-4DA1-9EB4-974CE7414066} AdobeHelp 3.4.0.0 -----------
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
----------- Payload: {9158FF30-78D7-40EF-B83E-451AC5334640} Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Driver 12.1.0.0 -----------
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
ERROR: DW050: The following payload errors were found during install:
ERROR: DW050: - Adobe ExtendScript Toolkit CS5.5: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Microsoft_VC90_ATL_x86: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Microsoft_VC90_CRT_x86: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Core: Failed due to Language Pack installation failure
ERROR: DW050: - Microsoft_VC80_ATL_x86: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 International English Language Pack_AdobePhotoshop12-en_GB: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Adobe XMP Panels CS5: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Photoshop Camera Raw: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Adobe Extension Manager CS5.5: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Adobe XMP Panels CS5_3.1_AdobeXMPPanelsAll: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - AdobeColorCommonSetRGB: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - AdobeColorPhotoshop CS5.5: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Adobe Device Central CS5.5: Failed due to Language Pack installation failure
ERROR: DW050: - Adobe Mini Bridge CS5.1: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - AdobeColorCommonSetCMYK: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Microsoft_VC90_MFC_x86: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Adobe Linguistics CS5: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - PDF Settings CS5: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - AdobeTypeSupport CS5: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Adobe CSXS Infrastructure CS5.5: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - AdobeColorEU CS5.5: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Microsoft_VC80_CRT_x86: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Adobe Device Central CS5.5_DeviceCentral3.5LP-en_GB: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - AdobeColorJA CS5.5: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - AdobeOutputModule: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Adobe WinSoft Linguistics Plugin CS5: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Microsoft_VC90_MFCLOC_x86: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - AdobePDFL CS5: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - AdobeCMaps CS5: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Adobe CSXS Extensions CS5.5: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Adobe ReviewPanel CS5.5: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Required Common Fonts Installation: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Adobe SwitchBoard 2.0: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Microsoft_VC80_MFC_x86: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Microsoft_VC80_MFCLOC_x86: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Recommended Common Fonts Installation: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - AdobeColorNA CS5.5: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - AdobeJRE: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - AdobeColorVideoProfilesCS CS5.5: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Suite Shared Configuration CS5.5: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Adobe Bridge CS5.1: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Support: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Photoshop Camera Raw_6.3_AdobeCameraRaw6.0All: Install failed

Hi Tazayoot94,
From the log I see you are getting "Error 1935".
This is a MSI error.
You can try the solution from the doc : http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/403/kb403969.html
Regards
SameeR

Windows XP boot problems after latest BDM Installed

Blackberry Desktop Manager 5.0.1
Hi Everyone,
I installed Blackberry Desktop Manager on a Dell Laptop yesterday and after a reboot it took forever to boot into Windows XP SP3 and when it did the machine was completely unresponsive.
I eventually managed to get the Task Manager running and it turns out that the process called System was using 99% CPU constantly.
Safe Mode took 20 minutes to go into Windows and again windows was unresponsive to the point I was unable to open the Control Panel and uninstall BDM.
I tried Last Known Good Configuration to no avail and in the end I reinstalled the System from Scratch.
I couldn't be 100% sure it was the installation of BDM that caused the problem because Windows had installed some updates so I figured a clean install would be a wise move.
I clean installed XP and updated to SP2 and everything was working perfectly again this morning so I tried to install BDM again - same problem!!!
The system is in a state of unresponsiveness again and I am trying desperately to get into Safe Mode to uninstall BDM which will hopefully restore my PC to a working state.
Does anyone have any ideas I can try or has anyone else experienced this?
I am relatively new to the Blackberry world but I am competent with Windows XP and a manner of technical issues but this is something that is really causing me a headache.

I have had the same problem repeatedly since I first got the 'update avilable' message on my Dell xp sp3.
I've found that turning off communication speeds up the computer so that you can go to a restore point or remove the program through the windows add/remove facility. On my machine (Inspiron 6000) it is fn and f2 keys together.
I did NOT have to rebuild my system.
And thank you - I was beginning to think it was me

Performance problems after Update from 7.6.00.37 to 7.6.03.15

Hi,
after the Update from 7.6.00.37 to 7.6.03.15 in our live system we noticed a lot of performance problems. We have tested the new version before on our test system, but there don't noticed effects like this.
We have 2 identical systems (Opteron 64 bit, openSuse 10.2) with log shipping between them. We updated first the standby system, switched from online to standby (with copy of cold log) and started the new server as online system. After that we run a complete backup (runtime: 1 hour) for starting a new backup history and for activating autolog. Then
With the update we changed USE_OPEN_DIRECT to YES, but the performance of the system was very slow afterwards. After the backup it remains at a high load average (> 10, previous system had about 2-4), with nearly 100% of CPU usage for the db kernel process.
Next day we switched USE_OPEN_DIRECT back to NO. The system first runs better, but periodically rises up to a load average of 6 and slow down the performance of various applications (somebody says about 10 times slower). Here we also noticed a high usage (now 200-300%) of the db kernel process.
Our questions are:
1. Has something basically changed from 7.6.00.37 to 7.6.03.15, so that our various applications (JDBC, ODBC and Perl/SQLDBC partially on old linux systems with drivers from 7.5.00.23) don't reach same performance as before?
2. Are there any other (new) parameters, which can help? Maybe reducing MAXCPU from 4 to 3 for reserving capacities for the system (there is only one maxdb instance running)?
3. Is the a possibility to switch back to 7.6.00.37 (only for worst case)?
I have made some first steps with x_cons, but don't see any anomalies on the first look.
Regards,
Thomas

Thomas Schulz wrote:>
> > > Next day we switched USE_OPEN_DIRECT back to NO. The system first runs better, but
> >
> > What is it about this parameter that lets you think it may be the cause for your problems?
> After changing it back to NO, the system runs better (lower load average) than with YES (but much slower than with old version!)
Hmm... that is really odd. When using USE_OPEN_DIRECT there is actually less work to do for he operating system.
> > > Our questions are
> > >
> > > 1. Has something basically changed from 7.6.00.37 to 7.6.03.15, so that our various applications (JDBC, ODBC and Perl/SQLDBC partially on old linux systems with drivers from 7.5.00.23) don't reach same performance as before?
> >
> > Yes - of course. Changes are what Patches are all about!
>
> Are there any known problems with updating from 7.6.00.37 to 7.6.03.15?
Well of course there are bugs that have been found inbetween the release of both versions, but I am not aware of something like the performance killer.
We will have to check this in detail here.
> > > I have made some first steps with x_cons, but don't see any anomalies on the first look.
> >
> > Ok, looking into what the system does when it uses CPU is a first good step.
> > But what would be "anomalies" to you?
>
> Good question! I don't really know.
Well - then I guess 'looking at the system' won't bring you far...
> > Do you use DBAnalyzer? If not -> activate it!
> > Does it gives you any warnings?
> > What about TIME_MEASUREMENT? Is it activated on the system? If not -> activate it!
>
> OK, that will be our next steps.
Great - let's see the warnings you get.
Let us also see the DB Parameters you set.
> > What parameters have changed due to the patch installations (check the parameter history file)?
> >
> > What queries take longer now? What is the execution plan of them?
>
> It seems to happen for all selects on tables with a lot of rows (>10.000, partially without indexes because automatically generated). With the old version we had no problems with missing indexes or the general performance. Unfortunatly it is very difficult to extract some sql statements out of the JBoss applications. But even simple queries (without any join) runs slower, when the load average rises over 4-5.
Hmm... the question here is still, if the execution plans are good enough to meet your expectations.
E.g. for tables that you access via the primary key it actually doesn't matter how many rows a table has (not for MaxDB at least).
> > BTW: how exactly do the tests look like that you've done on the testsystem?
> Usage over 6 weeks with our JDBC development environment (JBoss), backup and restore with various combinations of USE_OPEN_DIRECT and USE_OPEN_DIRECT_FOR_BACKUP.
Sounds like the I/O is your most suspect aspect for overall system performance...
> > Was the testsystem a 1:1 copy of the productive machine before the upgrade test?
> No - smaller hardware (32 bit), only 20% of data of the live system, few db users and applications.
>
> > How did you test the system performance with multiple parallel users?
> Only while permanent development with the 2-3 developers and some parallel tests of backup/restore. Unfortunately no tests with many users/applications.
Ok - so this is next to no testing at all when it comes to performance.
> An UPDATE STATISTICS over all db users seems to change nothing. At the moment the system remains markedly slow and we are searching for reasons and solutions. Another attempt will be the change of MAXCPU from 4 to 3.
Why do you want to do that? Have you observed any threads that don't get a CPU because all 4 cores are used by the MaxDB kernel?
regards,
Lars

Performance Problem After Upgrade

Hi Gurus,
We have successfully Upgrade our system R3 4.6c to ECC6, Database Oracle 10g on AIX.
Now we are facing Performance Problem. when we are checking Tables are taking Huge time to update data.
Regards,
Darshan...

Thanks! AC,
Performance Problem is resolved.
Now facing problem in RFC SAPXPG_DBDEST_ECCDB
Logon     Connection Error
Error Details     Error when opening an RFC connection
Error Details     ERROR: SAP gateway connection failed. Is SAP gateway started?
Error Details     LOCATION: SAP-Server eccci_LRP_00 on host eccci (wp 14)
Error Details     COMPONENT: CPIC
Error Details     COUNTER: 18
Error Details     MODULE:
Error Details     LINE:
Error Details     RETURN CODE: 236
Error Details     SUBRC: 0
Error Details     RELEASE: 700
Error Details     TIME: Tue Mar 17 11:57:01 2009
Error Details     VERSION:
Regards,
Darshan..

Performance problems after CS5 Trial install

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for