Performance Problems with Web Layouts in web interface

Hello Gurus,
We have a a BPS web interface tool which has the following design:
1> A web interface with several tabs
2> Each tab has around 3-4 input layouts which are dependent on each other
3> In all there are 120-140 layouts that the tool uses...
My questions were in term of performance
1> Is there a limit to how many web layouts you can use per page/tab/view or if SAP recommends specific number of web layouts per page/tab/view ?
2> If there is a limitation...our intention was to convert all the display layouts into BW reports so as to increase the performance of the tool....
3> Would like to know the restriction on the number of users who can log into the tool as a specific point of time ? We may have 50-60 minimum using this tool.
I would appreciate your help in this regard.
Thanks in advance

Hello Rashmi,
Have you got a chance to look at the performance guide and SAP notes on BPS performance. If not here are the details
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/documents/a1-8-4/performance guide - sap sem bw bps.pdf
Enclosed are the few SAP notes related for improving performance.
358921 - Oracle database parameterization for SEM
459897 - SEM-CPM: Performance when reading transaction data
566713 Required information for the analysis of performance problems
560369 - Proposals BW aggregates for SEM-BPS
180605 - Oracle database parameter settings for BW
124361 - Oracle parameterization (R/3 >= 4.x, Oracle 8.x / 9.x)
358529 - Overview of performance notes
350011 - Technical performance: Using the business content
340246 - Techn. performance: Overview of statistics
417091 - Optimize execution time of planning functions
Some of them are Oracle specific, ignore them if you are not oracle database. Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Praveen
PS.Dont forget to reward points

Similar Messages

Problem with plugins in my web site

Problem with plugins in my web site PLS HELP

i'm pretty sure you're going to get no help unless you supply some helpful information.

Problems with error-page in web.xml and page caching

Having a few problems with error pages and web.xml with browsers caching the error pages and strange errors coming out of weblogic.servlet.intenal.WebAppServletContext
I'm trying to set a web app up so that all http errors and all exceptions are routed thruogh predefined resources. For now, I'm simply send 400 errors to 400.html and the ServletException, IOException and RuntimeException to respective html pages.
What I'm finding is that the error codes work fine but the exceptions are only be routed to the correct error page for the first call to the servlet after server restart.
So for example, I have my servlet throwing a ServletException as a test case. The weblogic server log shows that ServletException is thrown, and the correct error page for ServletExceptions is shown.
If I change the Servlet code to throw IOException in place of SevletException, the weblogic.log shows that IOExceptyion is being thrown (so the servlet has deployed successfully), however the Servletxception error page is shown on the browser.
I'm using IE6 and I've changed the setting such that a new page is requested every time using the tools-internet options-temp internet files-settings option to "check for new versions of stored pages: Every visit to the page".
Despite this, the servlet exception error page still appears.
If you clear the cache from the temp intenet files->delete files IE option, the correct errror page will be shown so it appears that the browser cache is being used after all.
everytime I delete the temp intenet files I get the correct error page on the first request after but then not after that.
I have implemented the service method for this test to throw the exceptions - does this make a differecne?
As a test, I have moved the imlpementation to the doGet method instead bu I now get a strange eror from weblogic comlpaining about an arrayOutOfBoundsException because eror codes in the web.xml are not supported! - see error above.
Any help is appreciated

After further investigation: -
There are no problems with error pages based on error codes, only error exceptions.
As a test case, I have a service method in a servlet throwing either one of the three exception types that servlets can throw (Runtime, Servlet & IO) the following rules apply. The exception to be thrown is hardcoded and is changed and the web app rebuilt each time. The correct web.xml has been deployed to the app server (checked through console). the webapp is being redeployed correctly - this can be seen in the weblogic log, where the correct exception is reported.
I am using WLS 8.1, Servlet 2.3, JDK 1.4.1_02
In all cases, the weblogic log reports that the servlet is throwing the exception as expected.
Despite having set error-page for exception javax.servlet.ServletException, the exceptions are diverted to the error page that has been set up for http error code 500
The error page for ServletException is therefore never reached.
I have the browser set to request pages every time it is asked.
Once the servlet has thrown an IOException, the only way to get the browser to report an IO or Runtime exception error-page is to clear the browser cache. Restarting the server has no effect.
Once the servlet has responded with ANY exception, it is not possible to get it to report a ServletException (which is incorrectly reported as a 500 anyway) unless the cache is cleared. Restarting the server has no effect.
In the case where the servlet throws ServletException, it has no root exception. The servlet 2.3 spec states that if ServletException is thrown but cannot be found in the error pages, the root excpetion will be extracted and the error page list traversed again. Knowing that the RuntimeException error page is correct shown when RuntimeException is throwm, I have nested this inside the ServletException, however error page for http error 500 is still shown.
I don't believe this is a WLS 8.1 problem, as the console shows that the correct exception is thrown each time. this is backed up by the fact that the correct exception page is thrown when the cache is cleared regardless of what exception was previousdly thrown by the servlet. This excludes ServletException which is always incorrectly thrown as a 500.

Problems with LOV'S in Web

Hi,
I have a problem with LOV'S in Web. I've Forms Server in two servers. User's work with them.
When I push the LOV'S keys, the session is killed.
Please Help Me
Thaks

You need to break the problem down. Do you get the same problem with a one field Forms launching and LOV?
1) What key did you use?
2) What version of Forms
3) What OS?
4) Did you try on another OS?
5) Does it work client server?
1) I use Ctrl + L
2) Forms Deleveloper 6i Release 2
3) Windows 2000 server
4) No
5) Work OK
Why the session is killed ????
Thanks

Performance problem with Mavericks.

Performance problem with Mavericks. My Mac is extremly slow after upgrading to Mavericks. What can i do to solve that?

If you are still experiencing slow down issues, it maybe because of a few other reasons.
Our experience with OS X upgrades, and Mavericks is no exception, is that users have installed a combination of third party software and/or hardware that is incompatible and/or is outdated that causes many negative performance issues when upgrading to a new OS X version.
Your Mac's hard drive maybe getting full.
Do you run any antivirus software on your Mac? Commercial Antivirus software can slow down and negatively impact the normal operation of OS X.
Do you have apps like MacKeeper or any other maintenance apps like CleanMyMac 1 or 2, TuneUpMyMac or anything like these apps, installed on your Mac? These types of apps, while they appear to be helpful, can do too good a job of data "cleanup" causing the potential to do serious data corruption or data deletion and render a perfectly running OS completely dead and useless leaving you with a frozen, non-functional Mac.
Your Mac may have way too many applications launching at startup/login.
Your Mac may have old, non-updated or incompatible software installed.
Your Mac could have incompatible or outdated web browser extensions, plugins or add-ons.
Your Mac could have connected third party hardware that needs updated device drivers.
It would help us to help you if we could have some more technical info about your iMac.
If you so choose, please download, install and run Etrecheck.
Etrecheck was developed as a simple Mac diagnostic report tool by a regular Apple Support forum user and technical support contributor named Etresoft. Etrecheck is a small, unobstrusive app that compiles a static snapshot of your entire Mac hardware system and installed software.
This is a free app that has been honestly created to provided help in diagnosing issues with Macs running the new OS X 10.9 Mavericks.
It is not malware and can be safely downloaded and installed onto your Mac.
http://www.etresoft.com/etrecheck
Copy/paste and post its report here in another reply thread so that we have a complete profile of your Mac's hardware and installed software so we can all help continue with your Mac performance issues.
Thank you.

Performance problems with jdk 1.5 on Linux plattform

Performance problems with jdk 1.5 on Linux plattform
(not tested on Windows, might be the same)
After refactoring using the new features from java 1.5 I lost
performance significantly:
public Vector<unit> units;
The new code:
for (unit u: units) u.accumulate();
runs more than 30% slower than the old code:
for (int i = 0; i < units.size(); i++) units.elementAt(i).accumulate();
I expected the opposite.
Is there any information available that helps?

Here's the complete benchmark code I used:package test;
import java.text.NumberFormat;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.LinkedList;
import java.util.Vector;
public class IterationPerformanceTest {
     private int m_size;
     public IterationPerformanceTest(int size) {
          m_size = size;
     public long getArrayForLoopDuration() {
          Integer[] testArray = new Integer[m_size];
          for (int item = 0; item < m_size; item++) {
               testArray[item] = new Integer(item);
          StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
          long start = System.nanoTime();
          for (int index = 0; index < m_size; index++) {
               builder.append(testArray[index]);
          long end = System.nanoTime();
          System.out.println(builder.length());
          return end - start;
     public long getArrayForEachDuration() {
          Integer[] testArray = new Integer[m_size];
          for (int item = 0; item < m_size; item++) {
               testArray[item] = new Integer(item);
          StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
          long start = System.nanoTime();
          for (Integer item : testArray) {
               builder.append(item);
          long end = System.nanoTime();
          System.out.println(builder.length());
          return end - start;
     public long getArrayListForLoopDuration() {
          ArrayList<Integer> testList = new ArrayList<Integer>();
          for (int item = 0; item < m_size; item++) {
               testList.add(item);
          StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
          long start = System.nanoTime();
          for (int index = 0; index < m_size; index++) {
               builder.append(testList.get(index));
          long end = System.nanoTime();
          System.out.println(builder.length());
          return end - start;
     public long getArrayListForEachDuration() {
          ArrayList<Integer> testList = new ArrayList<Integer>();
          for (int item = 0; item < m_size; item++) {
               testList.add(item);
          StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
          long start = System.nanoTime();
          for (Integer item : testList) {
               builder.append(item);
          long end = System.nanoTime();
          System.out.println(builder.length());
          return end - start;
     public long getArrayListIteratorDuration() {
          ArrayList<Integer> testList = new ArrayList<Integer>();
          for (int item = 0; item < m_size; item++) {
               testList.add(item);
          StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
          long start = System.nanoTime();
          Iterator<Integer> iterator = testList.iterator();
          while(iterator.hasNext()) {
               builder.append(iterator.next());
          long end = System.nanoTime();
          System.out.println(builder.length());
          return end - start;
     public long getLinkedListForLoopDuration() {
          LinkedList<Integer> testList = new LinkedList<Integer>();
          for (int item = 0; item < m_size; item++) {
               testList.add(item);
          StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
          long start = System.nanoTime();
          for (int index = 0; index < m_size; index++) {
               builder.append(testList.get(index));
          long end = System.nanoTime();
          System.out.println(builder.length());
          return end - start;
     public long getLinkedListForEachDuration() {
          LinkedList<Integer> testList = new LinkedList<Integer>();
          for (int item = 0; item < m_size; item++) {
               testList.add(item);
          StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
          long start = System.nanoTime();
          for (Integer item : testList) {
               builder.append(item);
          long end = System.nanoTime();
          System.out.println(builder.length());
          return end - start;
     public long getLinkedListIteratorDuration() {
          LinkedList<Integer> testList = new LinkedList<Integer>();
          for (int item = 0; item < m_size; item++) {
               testList.add(item);
          StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
          long start = System.nanoTime();
          Iterator<Integer> iterator = testList.iterator();
          while(iterator.hasNext()) {
               builder.append(iterator.next());
          long end = System.nanoTime();
          System.out.println(builder.length());
          return end - start;
     public long getVectorForLoopDuration() {
          Vector<Integer> testVector = new Vector<Integer>();
          for (int item = 0; item < m_size; item++) {
               testVector.add(item);
          StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
          long start = System.nanoTime();
          for (int index = 0; index < m_size; index++) {
               builder.append(testVector.get(index));
          long end = System.nanoTime();
          System.out.println(builder.length());
          return end - start;
     public long getVectorForEachDuration() {
          Vector<Integer> testVector = new Vector<Integer>();
          for (int item = 0; item < m_size; item++) {
               testVector.add(item);
          StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
          long start = System.nanoTime();
          for (Integer item : testVector) {
               builder.append(item);
          long end = System.nanoTime();
          System.out.println(builder.length());
          return end - start;
     public long getVectorIteratorDuration() {
          Vector<Integer> testVector = new Vector<Integer>();
          for (int item = 0; item < m_size; item++) {
               testVector.add(item);
          StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
          long start = System.nanoTime();
          Iterator<Integer> iterator = testVector.iterator();
          while(iterator.hasNext()) {
               builder.append(iterator.next());
          long end = System.nanoTime();
          System.out.println(builder.length());
          return end - start;
      * @param args
     public static void main(String[] args) {
          IterationPerformanceTest test = new IterationPerformanceTest(1000000);
          System.out.println("\n\nRESULTS:");
          long arrayForLoop = test.getArrayForLoopDuration();
          long arrayForEach = test.getArrayForEachDuration();
          long arrayListForLoop = test.getArrayListForLoopDuration();
          long arrayListForEach = test.getArrayListForEachDuration();
          long arrayListIterator = test.getArrayListIteratorDuration();
//          long linkedListForLoop = test.getLinkedListForLoopDuration();
          long linkedListForEach = test.getLinkedListForEachDuration();
          long linkedListIterator = test.getLinkedListIteratorDuration();
          long vectorForLoop = test.getVectorForLoopDuration();
          long vectorForEach = test.getVectorForEachDuration();
          long vectorIterator = test.getVectorIteratorDuration();
          System.out.println("Array      for-loop: " + getPercentage(arrayForLoop, arrayForLoop) + "% ("+getDuration(arrayForLoop)+" sec)");
          System.out.println("Array      for-each: " + getPercentage(arrayForLoop, arrayForEach) + "% ("+getDuration(arrayForEach)+" sec)");
          System.out.println("ArrayList for-loop: " + getPercentage(arrayForLoop, arrayListForLoop) + "% ("+getDuration(arrayListForLoop)+" sec)");
          System.out.println("ArrayList for-each: " + getPercentage(arrayForLoop, arrayListForEach) + "% ("+getDuration(arrayListForEach)+" sec)");
          System.out.println("ArrayList iterator: " + getPercentage(arrayForLoop, arrayListIterator) + "% ("+getDuration(arrayListIterator)+" sec)");
//          System.out.println("LinkedList for-loop: " + getPercentage(arrayForLoop, linkedListForLoop) + "% ("+getDuration(linkedListForLoop)+" sec)");
          System.out.println("LinkedList for-each: " + getPercentage(arrayForLoop, linkedListForEach) + "% ("+getDuration(linkedListForEach)+" sec)");
          System.out.println("LinkedList iterator: " + getPercentage(arrayForLoop, linkedListIterator) + "% ("+getDuration(linkedListIterator)+" sec)");
          System.out.println("Vector     for-loop: " + getPercentage(arrayForLoop, vectorForLoop) + "% ("+getDuration(vectorForLoop)+" sec)");
          System.out.println("Vector     for-each: " + getPercentage(arrayForLoop, vectorForEach) + "% ("+getDuration(vectorForEach)+" sec)");
          System.out.println("Vector     iterator: " + getPercentage(arrayForLoop, vectorIterator) + "% ("+getDuration(vectorIterator)+" sec)");
     private static NumberFormat percentageFormat = NumberFormat.getInstance();
     static {
          percentageFormat.setMinimumIntegerDigits(3);
          percentageFormat.setMaximumIntegerDigits(3);
          percentageFormat.setMinimumFractionDigits(2);
          percentageFormat.setMaximumFractionDigits(2);
     private static String getPercentage(long base, long value) {
          double result = (double) value / (double) base;
          return percentageFormat.format(result * 100.0);
     private static NumberFormat durationFormat = NumberFormat.getInstance();
     static {
          durationFormat.setMinimumIntegerDigits(1);
          durationFormat.setMaximumIntegerDigits(1);
          durationFormat.setMinimumFractionDigits(4);
          durationFormat.setMaximumFractionDigits(4);
     private static String getDuration(long nanos) {
          double result = (double)nanos / (double)1000000000;
          return durationFormat.format(result);
}

Performance problems with new Java Tiger style recommendations

Performance problems with jdk 1.5 on Linux plattform
(not tested on Windows, might be the same)
using the new style recommendations.
I need fast Vector loops for high speed mathematical calculations, some
hints about the fastest way to program that loop would be also great!
After refactoring using the new features from java 1.5 (as recommended from
SUN) I lost performance significantly:
using a vector:
public Vector<unit> units;
The new code (recommended from SUN for Java Tiger for redesign):
for (unit u: units) u.accumulate();
runs more than 30% slower than the old code:
for (int i = 0; i < units.size(); i++) units.elementAt(i).accumulate();
I expected the opposite.
Is there any information available that helps?
The following additional information I got from Mr. Shankar Unni:
I got some fairly anomalous results comparing ArrayList and Vector: for the
1.5-style loops, ArrayList was faster then Vector, but for a loop with get()
calls, Vector was faster. Vector was even faster than that using
elementAt(), which was a surprise:
For a million summing iterations over a 100-element array:
vector elementAt loop took 3446 ms.
vector get loop took 3796 ms.
vector iterator loop took 5469 ms.
arraylist get loop took 4136 ms.
arraylist iterator loop took 4668 ms.

If your topic doesn't change, please stay in your original post.

Performance problems with SAP GUI 7.10 and BEx 3.5 Patch 400?

Hi everybody,
we installed SAP GUI 7.10 and BEx 3.5 Patch 400 and detected hugh performance problems with this version in comparison to the SAP GUI 6.40 and BEx 3.5 or BEx 7.0 Patch 800.
Does anybody detect the same problems?
Best regards,
Ulli

Most important question when you are talking about performance-issues:
which OC are you working on and which excel version?
ciao
Joke

Performance Problems with "For all Entries" and a big internal table

We have big Performance Problems with following Statement:
SELECT * FROM zeedmt_zmon INTO TABLE gt_zmon_help
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_zmon_help
    WHERE
    status = 'IAI200' AND
    logdat IN gs_dat AND
    ztrack = gt_zmon_help-ztrack.
In the internal table gt_zmon_help are over 1000000 entries.
Anyone an Idea how to improve the Performance?
Thank you!

>
Matthias Weisensel wrote:
> We have big Performance Problems with following Statement:
>
>
SELECT * FROM zeedmt_zmon INTO TABLE gt_zmon_help
>   FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_zmon_help
>     WHERE
>     status = 'IAI200' AND
>     logdat IN gs_dat AND
>     ztrack = gt_zmon_help-ztrack.
>
> In the internal table gt_zmon_help are over 1000000 entries.
> Anyone an Idea how to improve the Performance?
>
> Thank you!
You can't expect miracles. With over a million entries in your itab any select is going to take a bit of time. Do you really need all these records in the itab? How many records is the select bringing back? I'm assuming that you have got and are using indexes on your ZEEDMT_ZMON table.
In this situation, I'd first of all try to think of another way of running the query and restricting the amount of data, but if this were not possible I'd just run it in the background and accept that it is going to take a long time.

Performance problems with EP 6 and MS IE

Hi everybody,
since a couple of days, we are facing a sever performance problem with our SAP EP 6.0. When I access the system with MS Internet Explorer 6.0, it takes 5-10 minutes after the Login. With Firefox Browser, the performance is ok. Therefore I assume that it must be a problem with the IE settings. Does anybody know a solution?
Best regards,
Michael

There are a few things that this could be. I've seen the setting "Empty Temporary Internet Files folder when browser is closed" cause a lot of performance problems (This is in the advanced settings in your IE).
This will cause your cache to be cleared out each time the browser is closed and cause a lot more data to be downloaded each time you login to the system.
For more analysis I'd recommend putting a tool like HTTPWatch into your IE browser and seeing which requests are using the most time.

There is any Performance problem with Creation of many Y or Z Programs.

HI,
There is any Performance problem with Creation of many Y or Z Programs. plz give clarity regarding this to me......
regards
ganesh

Ganesh,
Can you please mention the context and the purpose of creating these custom program. And application are you referring to?
Regards,
Rohit

Performance problem with Orcacle / Crystal reports 8.5 / ASP

Hi,
I have a performance problem with reports running crystal reports 8.5 with oracle databases.
Fetching data appears to be slow. Oracle trace reports (tkprof) shows that fetchsize=1.
Fetchsize in Oracle ODBC is 15 (default).
How can I update te fetchsize in crystal reports?
I would appreciate any help.

CR XI R2 is also still available for purchase. This is the last version of CR to use the RDC. Contact sales at 866-681-3435.
Make sure the installed versin is 11.5.12.1838 - if it is not, apply SP6:
https://smpdl.sap-ag.de/~sapidp/012002523100015859952009E/crxir2win_sp6.exe
MSM:
https://smpdl.sap-ag.de/~sapidp/012002523100000634032010E/crxir2sp6_rdc_mm.zip
- Ludek
Edited by: Ludek Uher on Jan 4, 2011 10:05 AM

Performance problem with ojdbc14.jar

Hi,
We are having performance problem with ojdbc14.jar in selecting and updating (batch updates) entries in a table. The queries are taking minutes to execute. The same java code works fine with classes12.zip ans queries taking sub seconds to execute.
We have Oracle 9.2.0.5 Database Server and I have downloaded the ojdbc14.jar from Oracle site for the same. Tried executing the java code from windows 2000, Sun Solaris and Opteron machines and having the same problem.
Does any one know a solution to this problem? I also tried ojdbc14.jar meant for Oracle 10g, that did not help.
Please help.
Thanks
Yuva

My code is doing some thing which might be working well with classes12.zip and which does not work well with ojdbc14.jar? Any general suggestions to make the code better, especially for batch updates.
But for selecting a row from the table, I am using index columns in the where cluase. In the code using PreparedStatement, setting all the reuired fields. Here is the code. We have a huge index with 14 fields!!. All the parameters are for where clause.
if(longCallPStmt == null) {
longCallPStmt = conn.prepareStatement(longCallQuery);
log(Level.FINE, "CdrAggLoader: Loading tcdragg entry for "
+GeneralUtility.formatDate(cdrAgg.time_hour, "MM/dd/yy HH"));
longCallPStmt.clearParameters();
longCallPStmt.setInt(1, cdrAgg.iintrunkgroupid);
longCallPStmt.setInt(2, cdrAgg.iouttrunkgroupid);
longCallPStmt.setInt(3, cdrAgg.iintrunkgroupnumber);
longCallPStmt.setInt(4, cdrAgg.iouttrunkgroupnumber);
longCallPStmt.setInt(5, cdrAgg.istateregionid);
longCallPStmt.setTimestamp(6, cdrAgg.time_hour);
longCallPStmt.setInt(7, cdrAgg.icalltreatmentcode);
longCallPStmt.setInt(8, cdrAgg.icompletioncode);
longCallPStmt.setInt(9, cdrAgg.bcallcompleted);
longCallPStmt.setInt(10, cdrAgg.itodid);
longCallPStmt.setInt(11, cdrAgg.iasktodid);
longCallPStmt.setInt(12, cdrAgg.ibidtodid);
longCallPStmt.setInt(13, cdrAgg.iaskzoneid);
longCallPStmt.setInt(14, cdrAgg.ibidzoneid);
rs = longCallPStmt.executeQuery();
if(rs.next()) {
cdr_agg = new CdrAgg(
rs.getInt(1),
rs.getInt(2),
rs.getInt(3),
rs.getInt(4),
rs.getInt(5),
rs.getTimestamp(6),
rs.getInt(7),
rs.getInt(8),
rs.getInt(9),
rs.getInt(10),
rs.getInt(11),
rs.getInt(12),
rs.getInt(13),
rs.getInt(14),
rs.getInt(15),
rs.getInt(16)
}//if
end_time = System.currentTimeMillis();
log(Level.INFO, "CdrAggLoader: Loaded "+((cdr_agg==null)?0:1) + " "
+ GeneralUtility.formatDate(cdrAgg.time_hour, "MM/dd/yy HH")
+" tcdragg entry in "+(end_time - start_time)+" msecs");
} finally {
GeneralUtility.closeResultSet(rs);
GeneralUtility.closeStatement(pstmt);
Why that code works well for classes12.zip (comes back in around 10 msec) and not for ojdbc14.jar (comes back in 6-7 minutes)?
Please advise.

Performance problem with recordset object

Hi,
I have a performance problem with record set object. Is it true using RecordSet object as argument to the method will cause any perfomance degradation?
here is my code.
finStmtList = selectFinancialStatements(rs, shortFormat, latestOnly, true);
I changed the code by populating the recordset in the method that called the above statement. previously the population of valueobject is within the select FinancialStatements.
Now the method looks like
finStmtList = selectFinancialStatements(ValueObject, shortFormat, latestOnly, true);
Is this fix will result in any performance gain?

Can any one suggest me that the above RecordSet Object contains large number of records that counts up to 1000 rows and having 30 columns? I tested the application. But the performance varies from time to time.
Is there any other way to fine tune it?

Performance problem with sdn_nn - new 10g install

I am having a performance problem with sdn_nn after migrating to a new machine. The old Oracle version was 9.0.1.4. The new is 10g. The new machine is faster in general. Most (non-spatial) batch processes run in half the time. However, the below statement is radically slower. The below statement ran in 45 minutes before. On the new machine it hasn't finished after 10 hours. I am able to get a 5% sample of the customers to finish in 45 minutes.
Does anyone have any ideas on how to approach this problem? Any chance something isn't installed correctly on the new machine (the nth version of the query finishe, albeit 20 times slower)?
Appreciate any help. Thanks.
- Jack
create table nearest_store
as
select /*+ ordered */
a.customer_id,
b.store_id nearest_store,
round(mdsys.sdo_nn_distance(1),4) distance
from customers a,
stores b
where mdsys.sdo_nn(
b.geometry,
a.geometry,
'sdo_num_res=1, unit=mile',
1
) = 'TRUE'
;

Dan,
customers 110,000 (involved in this query)
stores 28,000
Here is the execution plan on the current machine:
CREATE TABLE STATEMENT cost = 81947
LOAD AS SELECT
PX COORDINATOR
PX SEND QC (RANDOM) :TQ10000
ROW NESTED LOOPS
1 1 PX BLOCK ITERATOR
1 1ROW TABLE ACCESS FULL CUSTOMERS
1 3 PARTITION RANGE ALL
1 3 TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID STORES
DOMAIN INDEX STORES_SIDX
I can't capture the execution plan on the old database. It is gone. I don't remember it being any different from the above (full scan customers, probe stores index once for each row in customers).
I am trying the query without the create table (just doing a count). I'll let you know on that one.
I am at 10.0.1.3.
Here is how I created the index:
create index stores_sidx
on stores(geometry)
indextype is mdsys.spatial_index LOCAL
Note that the stores table is partitioned by range on store type. There are three store types (each in its own partition). The query returns the nearest store of each type (three rows per customer). This is by design (based on the documented behavior of sdo_nn).
In addition to running the query without the CTAS, I am also going try running it on a different machine tonight. I let you know how that turns out.
The reason I ask about the install, is that the Database Quick Installation Guide for Solaris says this:
"If you intend to use Oracle JVM or Oracle interMedia, you must install the Oracle Database 10g Products installation type from the Companion CD. This installation optimizes the performance of those products on your system."
And, the Database Installlation Guide says:
"If you plan to use Oracle JVM or Oracle interMedia, Oracle strongly recommends that you install the natively compiled Java libraries (NCOMPs) used by those products from the Oracle Database 10g Companion CD. These libraries are required to improve the performance of the products on your platform."
Based on that, I am suspicious that maybe I have the product installed on the new machine, but not correctly (forgot to set fast=true).
Let me know if you think of anything else you'd like to see. Thanks.
- Jack

Performance problem with table COSS...

Hi
Anyone encountered performance problem with these table : COSS, COSB, COEP
Best Regards

>
gsana sana wrote:
> Hi Guru's
>
> this is the select Query which is taking much time in Production. so please help me to improve the preformance with BSEG.
>
> this is my select query:
>
> select bukrs
>               belnr
>               gjahr
>               bschl
>               koart
>               umskz
>               shkzg
>               dmbtr
>               ktosl
>               zuonr
>               sgtxt
>               kunnr
>         from bseg
>         into table gt_bseg1
>          for all entries in gt_bkpf
>        where bukrs eq p_bukrs
>          and belnr eq gt_bkpf-belnr
>          and gjahr eq p_gjahr
>          and buzei in gr_buzei
>          and bschl eq '40'
>          and ktosl ne 'BSP'.
>
> UR's
> GSANA
Hi,
This is what I know and please if any expert think its incorrect, please do correct me.
BSEG is a cluster table with BUKRS, BELNR, GJAHR and BUZEI as the key whereas other key will be stored in database as raw data thus SAP apps will need to convert that raw data first if we are using other keys in where condition. Hence, I suggest to use up to buzei in the where condition and filter other condition in internal table level like using Delete statement. Hope its help.
Regards,
Abraham

Performance Problems with Web Layouts in web interface

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for