Performance test app

I have updated my I pod touch 4g to iOS 6.1 . And now it works very slow. While playing games, it got strucked so many times. And I always turning off all other apps also. Even though it works very slow. I want to check my device performance with iOS 6.1. Is there any app for doing performance checking. ??????

and sorry for my english , i'm a French

Similar Messages

Can Web Performance Test work on AJAX or Javascript Project which will show only one URL for all the pages?

Hi there,
I'm working on testing a AJAX and JavaScript Project which has several pages but all in the same URL. I need to test some attribute on the page or parameter past by AJAX or Javascript. Can Web Performance Test work to get what I want?
Thanks,

Hello,
Thank you for your post.
Web performance test is used to test if a server responses correctly and the response is consistent with what we expected. And we test the response speed, the stability and scalability.
The Web Performance Test Recorder records both AJAX requests and requests that were submitted from JavaScript, but
web test does not execute JavaScript. I am afraid that you can’t use web test to test parameter past by AJAX or JavaScript.
Please see:
Web Performance Test Engine Overview
About JavaScript and ActiveX Controls in Web Performance Tests
From the first link, “Client-side scripting that sets parameter values or results in additional HTTP requests, such as AJAX, does affect the load on the server and might require you to manually modify the Web Performance Test to simulate the scripting.”
If you want to execute the function typically performed by script in web test, you need to accomplish it in coded web performance test or a web performance test plugin. Please see:
How to: Create a Coded Web Performance Test
How to: Create a Web Performance Test Plug-In
I am not sure what the ‘some attribute on the page’ is. If you mean that you want to test those controls on the page, you can do coded UI test, which can test that the user interface for an application functions correctly. The coded UI test performs actions
on the user interface controls for an application and verifies that the correct controls are displayed with the correct values. You can refer to this article for detailed information about code UI test:
Verifying Code by Using Coded User Interface Tests
Best regards,
Amanda Zhu [MSFT]
MSDN Community Support | Feedback to us
Develop and promote your apps in Windows Store
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.

Load & Performance Testing In The Cloud - Silverlight Support

I currently have Visual Studio Premium with MSDN. I know in order to use Load Testing in the cloud I will have to upgrade to Ultimate.
One of the our web apps that I need to do a load and performance test on uses SilverLight.
Here is my questions. I want to verify that the provisioned virtual machines in the cloud when I run load testing will support Silverlight. I know it sounds like a silly question but before I go to Management to approve this upgrade I need to verify it will
work. No need to waste money.
Thanks

Hi rgelston iso.com,
The web tests: Web tests are used to test the functionality of Web applications and to test Web applications under load. Web tests are used both in performance tests and stress tests. It works at the protocol layer by issuing HTTP requests.
Reference：
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff520100%28v=vs.110%29.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
So the real issue is that whether your apps meet the above requirements.
For example, for the general Silverlight Apps, it would have some limitations if you want to create web performance tests.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/anutthara/archive/2010/03/21/testing-support-for-silverlight-apps-in-visual-studio-2010.aspx
Best Regards,
Jack
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

[Ann] FirstACT 2.2 released for SOAP performance testing

Empirix Releases FirstACT 2.2 for Performance Testing of SOAP-based Web Services
FirstACT 2.2 is available for free evaluation immediately at http://www.empirix.com/TryFirstACT
Waltham, MA -- June 5, 2002 -- Empirix Inc., the leading provider of test and monitoring
solutions for Web, voice and network applications, today announced FirstACT™ 2.2,
the fifth release of the industry's first and most comprehensive automated performance
testing tool for Web Services.
As enterprise organizations are beginning to adopt Web Services, the types of Web
Services being developed and their testing needs is in a state of change. Major
software testing solution vendor, Empirix is committed to ensuring that organizations
developing enterprise software using Web Services can continue to verify the performance
of their enterprise as quickly and cost effectively as possible regardless of the
architecture they are built upon.
Working with organizations developing Web Services, we have observed several emerging
trends. First, organizations are tending to develop Web Services that transfer a
sizable amount of data within each transaction by passing in user-defined XML data
types as part of the SOAP request. As a result, they require a solution that automatically
generates SOAP requests using XML data types and allows them to be quickly customized.
Second, organizations require highly scalable test solutions. Many organizations
are using Web Services to exchange information between business partners and have
Service Level Agreements (SLAs) in place specifying guaranteed performance metrics.
Organizations need to performance test to these SLAs to avoid financial and business
penalties. Finally, many organizations just beginning to use automated testing tools
for Web Services have already made significant investments in making SOAP scripts
by hand. They would like to import SOAP requests into an automated testing tool
for regression testing.
Empirix FirstACT 2.2 meets or exceeds the testing needs of these emerging trends
in Web Services testing by offering the following new functionality:
1. Automatic and customizable test script generation for XML data types – FirstACT
2.2 will generate complete test scripts and allow the user to graphically customize
test data without requiring programming. FirstACT now includes a simple-to-use XML
editor for data entry or more advanced SOAP request customization.
2. Scalability Guarantee – FirstACT 2.2 has been designed to be highly scalable to
performance test Web Services. Customers using FirstACT today regularly simulate
between several hundred to several thousand users. Empirix will guarantee to
performance test the numbers of users an organization needs to test to meet its business
needs.
3. Importing Existing Test Scripts – FirstACT 2.2 can now import existing SOAP request
directly into the tool on a user-by-user basis. As a result, some users simulated
can import SOAP requests; others can be automatically generated by FirstACT.
Web Services facilitates the easy exchange of business-critical data and information
across heterogeneous network systems. Gartner estimates that 75% of all businesses
with more than $100 million in sales will have begun to develop Web Services applications
or will have deployed a production system using Web Services technology by the end
of 2002. As part of this move to Web Services, "vendors are moving forward with
the technology and architecture elements underlying a Web Services application model,"
Gartner reports. While this model holds exciting potential, the added protocol layers
necessary to implement it can have a serious impact on application performance, causing
delays in development and in the retrieval of information for end users.
"Today Web Services play an increasingly prominent but changing role in the success
of enterprise software projects, but they can only deliver on their promise if they
perform reliably," said Steven Kolak, FirstACT product manager at Empirix. "With
its graphical user interface and extensive test-case generation capability, FirstACT
is the first Web Services testing tool that can be used by software developers or
QA test engineers. FirstACT tests the performance and functionality of Web Services
whether they are built upon J2EE, .NET, or other technologies. FirstACT 2.2 provides
the most comprehensive Web Services testing solution that meets or exceeds the changing
demands of organizations testing Web Services for performance, functionality, and
functionality under load.”
Learn more?
Read about Empirix FirstACT at http://www.empirix.com/FirstACT. FirstACT 2.2 is
available for free evaluation immediately at http://www.empirix.com/TryFirstACT.
Pricing starts at $4,995. For additional information, call (781) 993-8500.

Simon,
I will admit, I almost never use SQL Developer. I have been a long time Toad user, but for this tool, I fumbled around a bit and got everything up and running quickly.
That said, I tried the new GeoRaptor tool using this tutorial (which is I think is close enough to get the jist). http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/georaptor/index.php?title=A_Gentle_Introduction:_Create_Table,_Metadata_Registration,_Indexing_and_Mapping
As I stumble around it, I'll try and leave some feedback, and probably ask some rather stupid questions.
Thanks for the effort,
Bryan

Performance Testing Oracle Retail Demand Forecasting application

Hi All
Has anyone performance tested Oracle Retail Demand Forecasting application ( RDF ) using LoadRunner? If yes can you please give me the protocol used and steps followed for scripting ?
Thanks

Hussein Sawwan wrote:
What is your application release?Our Application Release is 12.1.3
How do you get the error?The error occurs during playback in which I am getting a "You are trying to access a page that is no longer active" error. In addition, it states "- The referring page may have come from a previous session. Please select Home to proceed."
Can you post an example of "most of the correlation that is being referenced throughout the internet seemed to contain NCA functions"?
This was the link I was referring to http://martinspier.co.uk/how-to-script-oracle-11i-apps-on-loadrunner. I don't have the current knowledge in the differences between 11i at the intricate level but it seemed like when I accessed our 11i environment, the login portion is also http/https protocol. From what I noticed though that some of the oracle forms (i.e. payments module) have been converted to Webforms. So I was thinking from a login testing standpoint, the use of this tutorial would still be applicable. However, I just checked the Test Starter Kit Information Center (Note 239746.1) that Steven Chan provided and have downloaded their sample login script for 12.0.4. It seemed that they used the same multi NCA, WEB protocol but login information captured seemed to be capturing http requests only.
Thanks in advance Hussein and for anyone else who can chime in on this task. Any information would be greatly appreciated as I understand am new to not only Loadrunner but Oracle Financial Applications as well.
Regards,
Nikolai

UI performance testing of pivot table

Hi,
I was wondering if anyone could direct me to a tool that I can use to do performance testing on a pivot table. I am populating a pivot table(declaratively) with a data source of over 100,000 cells and I need to record the browser rendering time of the pivot table using 50 or so parallel threads(requests). I tried running performance tests using JMeter, but that didn't help.
This is what I tried so far with JMeter:
I deployed the application in the integratedweblogicserver and specify the Url to hit in JMeter ( http://127.0.0.1:7101/PivotTableSample-ViewController-context-root/faces/Sample) and added a response assertion for the response code 200. Although I am able to hit the url successfully, the response I get is a javascript with a message that says "This is the loopback script to process the url before the real page loads. It introduces a separate round trip". When I checked in firebug, it looks like request redirect of some sort happens from this javascript to another Url (with some randomly generated parameters) which then returns the html response of the pivot table. I am unable to hit that Url directly as I get a message saying "session expired". It looks like a redirect happens from the first request and then session is created for that request and a redirect occurs.
I am able to check the browser rendering time of the pivot table in firebug (.net tab), but that is only for a single request. I'd appreciate it if anyone could guide me on this.
Thanks
Naveen

I found the link below that explains configuration of JMeter for performance testing of ADF applications(Although I couldn't find a solution to figure out the browser rendering time for parallel threads).
http://one-size-doesnt-fit-all.blogspot.com/2010/04/configuring-apache-jmeter-specifically.html
Edited by: Naveen Ramanathan on Oct 3, 2010 10:24 AM

Performance testing of servlets / beans / jsp ?

Hi. I'd like to performance test my applications, anyone have a clue on what software to use?
I use Fort� for Java CE 3 as the IDE and TomCat 3.23 as the servlet / jsp container.
Hopefully there are some opensource tools to use for this?
Regards,
Chris

You can precompile JSP's, this removes the small hickup when they are requested the first time (making the server translate and compile them). Check the documentation of your specific web/application server on how to do this.
Otherwise:
- buy better hardware
- use a better application server
- make sure your network is properly configured (so packets don't get routed around the network four times before they reach their destination for example)
- make sure your program logic doesn't create bottlenecks such as
unnecessary HTTP requests, redundant loops, etc.
- optimize your database access, use connection pooling
- optimize your database queries. Create indexes, make sure the SQL queries themselves aren't doing unnecessary trips around the database, etc.

My gps is not working. I cannot use turn-by-turn navigation in google maps. I downloaded a GPS test app and it showed my phone is not locking on any satellites. How can I correct this?

My gps is not working. I cannot use turn-by-turn navigation in google maps. I downloaded a GPS test app and it showed my phone is not locking on any satellites. How can I correct this?

We certainly want to make sure you get the most out of the GPS, wplaxico! Was this tested primarily outdoors? When did this begin? Any other recent apps of updates installed when this started?
Thank you,
YaleK_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport
If my response answered your question please click the �Correct Answer� button under my response. This ensures others can benefit from our conversation. Thanks in advance for your help with this!!

Performance Testing - Upgrade from 4.6B to ECC6.0

Hi,
We are doing an upgrade from SAP 4.6B to ECC6.0. I would like to know what would be the best approach for doing a performance test in an upgrade project. More specifically,
1. What are the main components that need to be tested for performance?
2. What are the important transaction codes/external applications (if any) that can be used to do performance testing in both 4.6B and ECC6.0? (ST05 or ST30 or something else?)
3. Any best practice recommended by SAP for doing performance tests?
Thanks in Advance,
Reena

> We are doing an upgrade from SAP 4.6B to ECC6.0. I would like to know what would be the best approach for doing a performance test in an upgrade project. More specifically,
>
> 1. What are the main components that need to be tested for performance?
Those components you use.
> 2. What are the important transaction codes/external applications (if any) that can be used to do performance testing in both 4.6B and ECC6.0? (ST05 or ST30 or something else?)
What is "important" for you?
Markus

Log file sync top event during performance test -av 36ms

Hi,
During the performance test for our product before deployment into product i see "log file sync" on top with Avg wait (ms) being 36 which i feel is too high.
                                                           Avg
                                                          wait   % DB
Event                                 Waits     Time(s)   (ms)   time Wait Class
log file sync                       208,327       7,406     36   46.6 Commit
direct path write                   646,833       3,604      6   22.7 User I/O
DB CPU                                            1,599          10.1
direct path read temp             1,321,596         619      0    3.9 User I/O
log buffer space                      4,161         558    134    3.5 ConfiguratAlthough testers are not complaining about the performance of the appplication , we ,DBAs, are expected to be proactive about the any bad signals from DB.
I am not able to figure out why "log file sync" is having such slow response.
Below is the snapshot from the load profile.
              Snap Id      Snap Time      Sessions Curs/Sess
Begin Snap:    108127 16-May-13 20:15:22       105       6.5
End Snap:    108140 16-May-13 23:30:29       156       8.9
   Elapsed:              195.11 (mins)
   DB Time:              265.09 (mins)
Cache Sizes                       Begin        End
~~~~~~~~~~~                  ---------- ----------
               Buffer Cache:     1,168M     1,136M Std Block Size:         8K
           Shared Pool Size:     1,120M     1,168M      Log Buffer:    16,640K
Load Profile              Per Second    Per Transaction   Per Exec   Per Call
~~~~~~~~~~~~         ---------------    --------------- ---------- ----------
      DB Time(s):                1.4                0.1       0.02       0.01
       DB CPU(s):                0.1                0.0       0.00       0.00
       Redo size:          607,512.1           33,092.1
   Logical reads:            3,900.4              212.5
   Block changes:            1,381.4               75.3
Physical reads:              134.5                7.3
Physical writes:              134.0                7.3
      User calls:              145.5                7.9
          Parses:               24.6                1.3
     Hard parses:                7.9                0.4
W/A MB processed:          915,418.7           49,864.2
          Logons:                0.1                0.0
        Executes:               85.2                4.6
       Rollbacks:                0.0                0.0
    Transactions:               18.4Some of the top background wait events:
^LBackground Wait Events       DB/Inst: Snaps: 108127-108140
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
                                                             Avg
                                        %Time Total Wait    wait    Waits   % bg
Event                             Waits -outs   Time (s)    (ms)     /txn   time
log file parallel write         208,563     0      2,528      12      1.0   66.4
db file parallel write            4,264     0        785     184      0.0   20.6
Backup: sbtbackup                     1     0        516 516177      0.0   13.6
control file parallel writ        4,436     0         97      22      0.0    2.6
log file sequential read          6,922     0         95      14      0.0    2.5
Log archive I/O                   6,820     0         48       7      0.0    1.3
os thread startup                   432     0         26      60      0.0     .7
Backup: sbtclose2                     1     0         10   10094      0.0     .3
db file sequential read           2,585     0          8       3      0.0     .2
db file single write                560     0          3       6      0.0     .1
log file sync                        28     0          1      53      0.0     .0
control file sequential re       36,326     0          1       0      0.2     .0
log file switch completion            4     0          1     207      0.0     .0
buffer busy waits                     5     0          1     116      0.0     .0
LGWR wait for redo copy             924     0          1       1      0.0     .0
log file single write                56     0          1       9      0.0     .0
Backup: sbtinfo2                      1     0          1     500      0.0     .0During a previous perf test , things didnt look this bad for "log file sync. Few sections from the comparision report(awrddprt.sql)
{code}
Workload Comparison
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1st Per Sec 2nd Per Sec %Diff 1st Per Txn 2nd Per Txn %Diff
DB time: 0.78 1.36 74.36 0.02 0.07 250.00
CPU time: 0.18 0.14 -22.22 0.00 0.01 100.00
Redo size: 573,678.11 607,512.05 5.90 15,101.84 33,092.08 119.13
Logical reads: 4,374.04 3,900.38 -10.83 115.14 212.46 84.52
Block changes: 1,593.38 1,381.41 -13.30 41.95 75.25 79.38
Physical reads: 76.44 134.54 76.01 2.01 7.33 264.68
Physical writes: 110.43 134.00 21.34 2.91 7.30 150.86
User calls: 197.62 145.46 -26.39 5.20 7.92 52.31
Parses: 7.28 24.55 237.23 0.19 1.34 605.26
Hard parses: 0.00 7.88 100.00 0.00 0.43 100.00
Sorts: 3.88 4.90 26.29 0.10 0.27 170.00
Logons: 0.09 0.08 -11.11 0.00 0.00 0.00
Executes: 126.69 85.19 -32.76 3.34 4.64 38.92
Transactions: 37.99 18.36 -51.67
First Second Diff
1st 2nd
Event Wait Class Waits Time(s) Avg Time(ms) %DB time Event Wait Class Waits Time(s) Avg Time
(ms) %DB time
SQL*Net more data from client Network 2,133,486 1,270.7 0.6 61.24 log file sync Commit 208,355 7,407.6
35.6 46.57
CPU time N/A 487.1 N/A 23.48 direct path write User I/O 646,849 3,604.7
5.6 22.66
log file sync Commit 99,459 129.5 1.3 6.24 log file parallel write System I/O 208,564 2,528.4
12.1 15.90
log file parallel write System I/O 100,732 126.6 1.3 6.10 CPU time N/A 1,599.3
N/A 10.06
SQL*Net more data to client Network 451,810 103.1 0.2 4.97 db file parallel write System I/O 4,264 784.7 1
84.0 4.93
-direct path write User I/O 121,044 52.5 0.4 2.53 -SQL*Net more data from client Network 7,407,435 279.7
0.0 1.76
-db file parallel write System I/O 986 22.8 23.1 1.10 -SQL*Net more data to client Network 2,714,916 64.6
0.0 0.41
{code}
*To sum it sup:
1. Why is the IO response getting such an hit during the new perf test? Please suggest*
2. Does the number of DB writer impact "log file sync" wait event? We have only one DB writer as the number of cpu on the host is only 4
{code}
select *from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
CORE 11.1.0.7.0 Production
TNS for HPUX: Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
{code}
Please let me know if you would like to see any other stats.
Edited by: Kunwar on May 18, 2013 2:20 PM

1. A snapshot interval of 3 hours always generates meaningless results
Below are some details from the 1 hour interval AWR report.
Platform                         CPUs Cores Sockets Memory(GB)
HP-UX IA (64-bit)                   4     4       3      31.95
              Snap Id      Snap Time      Sessions Curs/Sess
Begin Snap:    108129 16-May-13 20:45:32       140       8.0
End Snap:    108133 16-May-13 21:45:53       150       8.8
   Elapsed:               60.35 (mins)
   DB Time:              140.49 (mins)
Cache Sizes                       Begin        End
~~~~~~~~~~~                  ---------- ----------
               Buffer Cache:     1,168M     1,168M Std Block Size:         8K
           Shared Pool Size:     1,120M     1,120M      Log Buffer:    16,640K
Load Profile              Per Second    Per Transaction   Per Exec   Per Call
~~~~~~~~~~~~         ---------------    --------------- ---------- ----------
      DB Time(s):                2.3                0.1       0.03       0.01
       DB CPU(s):                0.1                0.0       0.00       0.00
       Redo size:          719,553.5           34,374.6
   Logical reads:            4,017.4              191.9
   Block changes:            1,521.1               72.7
Physical reads:              136.9                6.5
Physical writes:              158.3                7.6
      User calls:              167.0                8.0
          Parses:               25.8                1.2
     Hard parses:                8.9                0.4
W/A MB processed:          406,220.0           19,406.0
          Logons:                0.1                0.0
        Executes:               88.4                4.2
       Rollbacks:                0.0                0.0
    Transactions:               20.9
Top 5 Timed Foreground Events
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                                                           Avg
                                                          wait   % DB
Event                                 Waits     Time(s)   (ms)   time Wait Class
log file sync                        73,761       6,740     91   80.0 Commit
log buffer space                      3,581         541    151    6.4 Configurat
DB CPU                                              348           4.1
direct path write                   238,962         241      1    2.9 User I/O
direct path read temp               487,874         174      0    2.1 User I/O
Background Wait Events       DB/Inst: Snaps: 108129-108133
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
                                                             Avg
                                        %Time Total Wait    wait    Waits   % bg
Event                             Waits -outs   Time (s)    (ms)     /txn   time
log file parallel write          61,049     0      1,891      31      0.8   87.8
db file parallel write            1,590     0        251     158      0.0   11.6
control file parallel writ        1,372     0         56      41      0.0    2.6
log file sequential read          2,473     0         50      20      0.0    2.3
Log archive I/O                   2,436     0         20       8      0.0     .9
os thread startup                   135     0          8      60      0.0     .4
db file sequential read             668     0          4       6      0.0     .2
db file single write                200     0          2       9      0.0     .1
log file sync                         8     0          1     152      0.0     .1
log file single write                20     0          0      21      0.0     .0
control file sequential re       11,218     0          0       0      0.1     .0
buffer busy waits                     2     0          0     161      0.0     .0
direct path write                     6     0          0      37      0.0     .0
LGWR wait for redo copy             380     0          0       0      0.0     .0
log buffer space                      1     0          0      89      0.0     .0
latch: cache buffers lru c            3     0          0       1      0.0     .0     2 The log file sync is a result of commit --> you are committing too often, maybe even every individual record.
Thanks for explanation. +Actually my question is WHY is it so slow (avg wait of 91ms)+3 Your IO subsystem hosting the online redo log files can be a limiting factor.
We don't know anything about your online redo log configuration
Below is my redo log configuration.
    GROUP# STATUS TYPE    MEMBER                                                       IS_
         1         ONLINE /oradata/fs01/PERFDB1/redo_1a.log                           NO
         1         ONLINE /oradata/fs02/PERFDB1/redo_1b.log                           NO
         2         ONLINE /oradata/fs01/PERFDB1/redo_2a.log                           NO
         2         ONLINE /oradata/fs02/PERFDB1/redo_2b.log                           NO
         3         ONLINE /oradata/fs01/PERFDB1/redo_3a.log                           NO
         3         ONLINE /oradata/fs02/PERFDB1/redo_3b.log                           NO
6 rows selected.
04:13:14 perf_monitor@PERFDB1> col FIRST_CHANGE# for 999999999999999999
04:13:26 perf_monitor@PERFDB1> select *from v$log;
    GROUP#    THREAD# SEQUENCE#      BYTES    MEMBERS ARC STATUS                 FIRST_CHANGE# FIRST_TIME
         1          1      40689 524288000          2 YES INACTIVE              13026185905545 18-MAY-13 01:00
         2          1      40690 524288000          2 YES INACTIVE              13026185931010 18-MAY-13 03:32
         3          1      40691 524288000          2 NO CURRENT               13026185933550 18-MAY-13 04:00Edited by: Kunwar on May 18, 2013 2:46 PM

Need to install Visual C++ 2010 in MDT before performance testing.

Hi all,
I'm in a situation in which I'm deploying a laptop over MDT, and the display driver is captured by MDT fine. However, upon initial boot after installing the OS, I come across this error when running WINSAT.exe; "The program can't start because MSVCR100.dll
is missing from your computer. Try reinstalling the program to fix the problem." This isn't the first report I've seen of ATI drivers triggering this, but I'm stuck with it regardless.
This is attributed to a component of Visual C++ 2010 not being installed. (It's not preinstalled in our capture, and I'm trying to avoid having to do that again.)
Being that we're a 0-touch organization when imaging, I need a way to remedy this. I'm currently trying to run the install, 'vcredist_x86.exe /q:a' from "run a command line" (sourced on the server's C:\ drive) before the performance tests,
but I can't find a proper place to put this command at in the task sequence. Is this even a viable method? Is there a method to skip WINSAT.exe pre-boot? My initial tests with this aren't working.
Any advice or pointers appreciated!

Hi,
Normally I think WinSAT is only relevant when deploying the image to your targeted computers (hardware). So why not integrate Visual C++ components into your reference image?
At the customer I'm currently working for we also put all our Visual C++ installations in the so called Build image.
I have provided a list with the install commands for the various programs.
Visual C++ 2005 SP1 ATL Security Update x64
msiexec /i "vcredist.msi" /qb
Visual C++ 2005 SP1 ATL Security Update x86
msiexec /i "vcredist.msi" /qb
Visual C++ 2005 SP1 MFC Security Update x64
msiexec /i "vcredist.msi" /qb
Visual C++ 2005 SP1 MFC Security Update x86
msiexec /i "vcredist.msi" /qb
Visual C++ 2008 SP1 ATL Security Update x64
install.exe /q
Visual C++ 2008 SP1 ATL Security Update x86
install.exe /q
Visual C++ 2008 SP1 MFC Security Update x64
install.exe /q
Visual C++ 2008 SP1 MFC Security Update x86
install.exe /q
Visual_C_2005_SP1_x64_8_0_56336_EN_M1
msiexec /i "vcredist.msi" /qb
Visual_C_2005_SP1_x64_8_0_59192_EN_M1
msiexec /i "vcredist.msi" /qb
Visual_C_2005_SP1_x86_8_0_50727_42_EN_M1
msiexec /i "vcredist.msi" /qb
Visual_C_2005_SP1_x86_8_0_59193_EN_M1
msiexec /i "vcredist.msi" /qb
Visual_C_2008_SP1_x64_9_0_30729_17_EN_M1
msiexec /i "vc_red.msi" /qb
Visual_C_2008_SP1_x64_9_0_30729_4148_EN_M1
msiexec /i "vc_red.msi" /qb
Visual_C_2008_SP1_x86_9_0_210022_EN_M1
install.exe /q
Visual_C_2008_SP1_x86_9_0_30729_17_EN_M1
msiexec /i "vc_red.msi" /qb
Visual_C_2008_SP1_x86_9_0_30729_4148_EN_M1
msiexec /i "vc_red.msi" /qb
Visual_C_2010_x64_10_0_40219_EN_M1
msiexec.exe /i "vc_red.msi" /qb
Visual_C_2010_x86_10_0_40219_EN_M1
msiexec.exe /i "vc_red.msi" /qb
Trying to install Visual C++ and than run WinSAT post OS installation will not work.
If this post is helpful please click "Mark for answer", thanks! Kind regards

How to setup the environment for doing the Performance Testing?

Hi,
We are planning to start the performance testing for iProcurement Product, Max number of user we are going to use 1000. For this simulation, what are all basic setups need to do for Application Tier, Database Tier,etc... Can anyone suggest what is procedure to setup environment depending upon the load?

User Guides for thee rv120W are here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/csbr/rv220w/quick_start/guide/rv220w_qsg.pdf
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/csbr/rv120w/administration/guide/rv120w_admin.pdf
and theres some more stuff over on my site:
http://www.linksysinfo.org/index.php?forums/cisco-small-business-routers-and-vpn-solutions.49/

Testing app on device shows only black screen.

Hi,
I created hello world app, app is working fine on simulator,
But when I install this app on device, and launch it from devie it shows only black screen. I am not sure whats the possible reason for this.
Device which I am using is Intex cloud fx.
Does any here faced this problem?
Thanks

Hi Malkit Singh,
I'm sorry to hear that you're having problems installing a test app that you developed for your Intex Cloud Fx.
Unfortunately, I have not heard of this issue. Do you have a different Firefox OS device that you would be able to test this on?
I would also suggest contacting Intex Support for device-specific issues.
If you believe there might be something wrong with the code in the test app, you can ask developer-related questions on [http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/firefox-os StackOverflow].
Please let us know if you have any other questions about your new Firefox OS device! =)
- Ralph

Getting error message "unable to perform in-app purchase"

I have been trying to renew the subsription on the Sun app on my iPhone 4 but i am getting the error message "Unable to perform in-app purchase", I have money in my account, i have turned my phone off and back on and restarted it. Also my internet connection is fine. I cant work out why it won't make the purchase when i have had this app for a few months now and have always been able to renew my subscription each month without any issues, any idea why this could be happening?
thanks =)

Did you check your restrictions?

FORMS CRASHES (FRM-92101) ON AS 10.1.2.0.2 DURING LOAD PERFORMANCE TESTING

Hiya
We have been doing Load Performance Testing using testing tool QALoad on our Forms 10g application. After about 56 virtual users(sessions) have logged-in into our application, if a new user tries to log-in into our application, the Forms crashes. As soon as we encounter the FRM-92101 error, no more new forms session are able to start.
The Load Testing software start up each process very quickly, about every 10 seconds.
The very first form that appears is the login form of our application. So before the login screen appears, we get FRM-92101 error message.
However, those users who have already logged-in into our application, they are able to carry on their tasks.
We are using Application Server 10g 10.1.2.0.2. I have checked the status on Application Server through Oracle Enterprise Manager Console. The OC4J Instance is up and running. Also, server's configuration is pretty good. It is running on 2 CPUs (AMD Opteron 3GHz) and has 32GB of memory. The memory used by those 56 sessions is less than 3GB.
The Applicatin Server is running on a Microsoft Windows Server 2003 64bit Enterprise Edition.
Any help will be much appreciated.
Cheers
Mayur

Hi Shekhawat
In Windows Registry go to
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\SubSystems
In the right hand side panel, you will find String Value as Windows. Now double click on it (Windows). In the pop up window you will see a string similar to the following one:
%SystemRoot%\system32\csrss.exe ObjectDirectory=\Windows SharedSection=1024,20480,768 Windows=On SubSystemType=Windows ServerDll=basesrv,1 ServerDll=winsrv:UserServerDllInitialization,3 ServerDll=winsrv:ConServerDllInitialization,2 ProfileControl=Off MaxRequestThreads=16
Now if you read it carefully in the above string, you will find this parameter
SharedSection=1024,20480,768
Here SharedSection specifies the system and desktop heaps using the following format:
SharedSection=xxxx,yyyy,zzzz
The default values are 1024,3072,512
All the values are in Kilobytes (KB)
xxxx = System-wide Heapsize. There is no need to modify this value.
yyyy = IO Desktop Heapsize. This is the heap for memory objects in the IO Desktop.
zzzz = Non-IO Desktop Heapsize. This is the heap for memory objects in the Non-IO Desktop.
On our server the values were as follows :
1024,20480,768
We changed the size of Non-IO desktop heapsize from 768 to 5112. With 5112 KB we managed to test our application for upto 495 virtual users.
Cheers
Mayur

Performance test app

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for