Performance test / Load Test in EP

Hi Experts ,
System Landscape - EP 2004s / TREX rev 31
We need to do response testing / load testing in EP.
Test will cover following KPIs .
    a) Login time / response .
    b) Navigation Time / response.
    c) search time / response.
    d) Load testing .
    Does SAP suggest any tool for this or any method how to perform this .
    Does anybody have any Idea how to go about this ?
Thanks & Regards
Amit kade

Hi Amit,
Check this thread
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=21561&tstart=0
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Venkat.
Reward points for useful ans.

Similar Messages

  • FORMS CRASHES (FRM-92101) ON AS 10.1.2.0.2 DURING LOAD PERFORMANCE TESTING

    Hiya
    We have been doing Load Performance Testing using testing tool QALoad on our Forms 10g application. After about 56 virtual users(sessions) have logged-in into our application, if a new user tries to log-in into our application, the Forms crashes. As soon as we encounter the FRM-92101 error, no more new forms session are able to start.
    The Load Testing software start up each process very quickly, about every 10 seconds.
    The very first form that appears is the login form of our application. So before the login screen appears, we get FRM-92101 error message.
    However, those users who have already logged-in into our application, they are able to carry on their tasks.
    We are using Application Server 10g 10.1.2.0.2. I have checked the status on Application Server through Oracle Enterprise Manager Console. The OC4J Instance is up and running. Also, server's configuration is pretty good. It is running on 2 CPUs (AMD Opteron 3GHz) and has 32GB of memory. The memory used by those 56 sessions is less than 3GB.
    The Applicatin Server is running on a Microsoft Windows Server 2003 64bit Enterprise Edition.
    Any help will be much appreciated.
    Cheers
    Mayur

    Hi Shekhawat
    In Windows Registry go to
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\SubSystems
    In the right hand side panel, you will find String Value as Windows. Now double click on it (Windows). In the pop up window you will see a string similar to the following one:
    %SystemRoot%\system32\csrss.exe ObjectDirectory=\Windows SharedSection=1024,20480,768 Windows=On SubSystemType=Windows ServerDll=basesrv,1 ServerDll=winsrv:UserServerDllInitialization,3 ServerDll=winsrv:ConServerDllInitialization,2 ProfileControl=Off MaxRequestThreads=16
    Now if you read it carefully in the above string, you will find this parameter
    SharedSection=1024,20480,768
    Here SharedSection specifies the system and desktop heaps using the following format:
    SharedSection=xxxx,yyyy,zzzz
    The default values are 1024,3072,512
    All the values are in Kilobytes (KB)
    xxxx = System-wide Heapsize. There is no need to modify this value.
    yyyy = IO Desktop Heapsize. This is the heap for memory objects in the IO Desktop.
    zzzz = Non-IO Desktop Heapsize. This is the heap for memory objects in the Non-IO Desktop.
    On our server the values were as follows :
    1024,20480,768
    We changed the size of Non-IO desktop heapsize from 768 to 5112. With 5112 KB we managed to test our application for upto 495 virtual users.
    Cheers
    Mayur

  • Creating load for performance testing on SSAS and Power View on SharePoint 2013

    We have SQL Server DW, SSAS OLAP Cube and Sharepoint 2013 on dedicated virtual machines.
    We would like to create load simulating use of 500 end-users.
    What are best tools?
    What are best methods?
    Kenny_I

    Hi Kenny_I,
    According to your description, you want to create a PowerView report using SQL Server Analysis Services database in a SharePoint site, now you need to do a load testing for this report, right?
    In SharePoint level, there are many tools that helps in the load testing. For the details, please refer to the link below.
    SharePoint (Performance, Stress ) Load Testing
    For the PowerView report level, you can refer to the link below to see how to track down Power View Performance Problems.
    Tracking down Power View Performance Problems
    Regards,
    Charlie Liao
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click
    here.
    Charlie Liao
    TechNet Community Support

  • Load & Performance Testing In The Cloud - Silverlight Support

    I currently have Visual Studio Premium with MSDN. I know in order to use Load Testing in the cloud I will have to upgrade to Ultimate.
    One of the our web apps that I need to do a load and performance test on uses SilverLight.
    Here is my questions. I want to verify that the provisioned virtual machines in the cloud when I run load testing will support Silverlight. I know it sounds like a silly question but before I go to Management to approve this upgrade I need to verify it will
    work. No need to waste money.
    Thanks

    Hi rgelston iso.com,
    The web tests: Web tests are used to test the functionality of Web applications and to test Web applications under load. Web tests are used both in performance tests and stress tests. It works at the protocol layer by issuing HTTP requests.
    Reference:
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff520100%28v=vs.110%29.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
    So the real issue is that whether your apps meet the above requirements.
    For example, for the general Silverlight Apps, it would have some limitations if you want to create web performance tests.
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/anutthara/archive/2010/03/21/testing-support-for-silverlight-apps-in-visual-studio-2010.aspx
    Best Regards,
    Jack
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • Load & Performance testing of VB applications

    How we can perform load & performance testing of VB6 applications? Are there any tools available for same?

    You could look at something like this:
    http://www.aholme.co.uk/Profiler/Install.htm
    However VB6 as a development environment is no longer supported by Microsoft and this forum is not for VB6 questions, but VB.NET questions.
    Matt Kleinwaks - MSMVP MSDN Forums Moderator - www.zerosandtheone.com

  • Load/Performance Testing using ECATT

    Please provide the process to perform Load/Performance Testing using ECATT ASAP. 
    What are the T-Codes are required to fulfill Load/Performance Testing using ECATT.
    Thanks in ADVANCE.

    Hello Colleague,
    Here are the steps that you need to do, for performance testing using ST30.
    Use transaction ST30 to invoke Global Performance Analysis ( Widely used for performance tests of certain transactions ).
    On the eCATT test tab, Key in the folloing data
    Log ID ( needs to be created ONLY for the first run ),
    Performance test ( logically the entries for Perrformance test field are of the format:
    Logid_name/PERF_transaction_name/systemname/client/date ),
    Name of the testconfiguration ( You need to create a test configuration for the eCATT to be used in ST30, use the same name for the created Test
    configuration as that of the test script ),
    No of times the test configuration needs to be run as the preprocessor to create the required backend data, No of times the test configutation needs to
    run as processor ( both these fields are filled with 5 and 5 or 5 and 10 respectively for performance measurements, but in your case you can give a 1 and 1
    or 0 and 1 in these fields for your requirements )
    With all the check boxes in the Programming guidelines and Distributed Statistics Data unchecked ( unless req ). In the data comparison ( use No - option
    for With values ).
    Click on the eCATT test only button to start the performance run using ST30.
    Now the procedure stated above makes the eCATT test configuration execute as many times as the sum of pre and pro given by the user AT ONE STRETCH ONLY. But if there is a requirement of having the eCATT execute after an interval, we follow a different approach.
    We have a VB script that will create a ECA session, call se37, select the required test package and then execute all the required test cases ( eCATTs ) in the
    test package and also ensure the KILL ECA session at the end of the execution.
    We then create a batch file to execute the VB script and call the batch file for our executions
    In you case, please schedule the execution of the batch file for every 30 mins ( or any such time duration ) using the simple scheduler functionality provided by
    Windows.
    The only problem with this is that whenever we have some system messages / Software updates / any new screens the scheduling is bound to fail as the called VB script does not handle the new situation. Please also ensure that the user whose Password has been given in the scheduler has to be the user who has logged into the system during the execution period.
    So, to summarize : ST30 will only allow you to run the eCATT as many times as required, but only at ONE STRETCH, you need to use the second mechanism to make the eCATT run effectively after a predetermined time without any user interaction.
    FYI : A new feature to handle the scheduling of executions is being developed, will post the details when it is available and the usage steps soon. We also have a new command called PERF ENDPERF in eCATT also ( a new development ), kindly go through the documentations for the new developments in eCATTs for the same
    Thanks and best regards,
    Sachin

  • Load and performance testing

    How to do Load and performance test after upgrading database to 11gR2 during the dev and acceptance test. How to compare the performance before upgrade(10gR2 with 11.5.01.2) and after upgrade 11Gr2(11gR2 with 11.5.10.2).
    Regards
    appsdba

    Please see old threads for similar discussion -- http://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=Performance+AND+Testing&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • Performance and Load testing for Agentry applications in SMP2.3

    Hello Experts,
    We have a requirement to carry out the Performance and Load testing for our SAP Work Manager application (SMP2.3).
    Please guide me if ATE (Agentry Test environment) /  Jmeter / or any other testing tool can be utilized for the same.
    Would be great if you could provide me the steps / references for the same.
    Thanks,
    Abhishek

    Hi Abhishek,
    Please refer this document Agentry - Assets for Admins & Architects. It has very good content which explains about performance testing and performance tuning.
    Rgrds,
    Jitendra

  • UI performance testing of pivot table

    Hi,
    I was wondering if anyone could direct me to a tool that I can use to do performance testing on a pivot table. I am populating a pivot table(declaratively) with a data source of over 100,000 cells and I need to record the browser rendering time of the pivot table using 50 or so parallel threads(requests). I tried running performance tests using JMeter, but that didn't help.
    This is what I tried so far with JMeter:
    I deployed the application in the integratedweblogicserver and specify the Url to hit in JMeter ( http://127.0.0.1:7101/PivotTableSample-ViewController-context-root/faces/Sample) and added a response assertion for the response code 200. Although I am able to hit the url successfully, the response I get is a javascript with a message that says "This is the loopback script to process the url before the real page loads. It introduces a separate round trip". When I checked in firebug, it looks like request redirect of some sort happens from this javascript to another Url (with some randomly generated parameters) which then returns the html response of the pivot table. I am unable to hit that Url directly as I get a message saying "session expired". It looks like a redirect happens from the first request and then session is created for that request and a redirect occurs.
    I am able to check the browser rendering time of the pivot table in firebug (.net tab), but that is only for a single request. I'd appreciate it if anyone could guide me on this.
    Thanks
    Naveen

    I found the link below that explains configuration of JMeter for performance testing of ADF applications(Although I couldn't find a solution to figure out the browser rendering time for parallel threads).
    http://one-size-doesnt-fit-all.blogspot.com/2010/04/configuring-apache-jmeter-specifically.html
    Edited by: Naveen Ramanathan on Oct 3, 2010 10:24 AM

  • Can Web Performance Test work on AJAX or Javascript Project which will show only one URL for all the pages?

    Hi there,
    I'm working on testing a AJAX and JavaScript Project which has several pages but all in the same URL. I need to test some attribute on the page or parameter past by AJAX or Javascript. Can Web Performance Test work to get what I want?
    Thanks,
    

    Hello,
    Thank you for your post.
    Web performance test is used to test if a server responses correctly and the response is consistent with what we expected. And we test the response speed, the stability and scalability.
    The Web Performance Test Recorder records both AJAX requests and requests that were submitted from JavaScript, but
     web test does not execute JavaScript. I am afraid that you can’t use web test to test parameter past by AJAX or JavaScript.
    Please see:
    Web Performance Test Engine Overview
    About JavaScript and ActiveX Controls in Web Performance Tests
    From the first link, “Client-side scripting that sets parameter values or results in additional HTTP requests, such as AJAX, does affect the load on the server and might require you to manually modify the Web Performance Test to simulate the scripting.”
    If you want to execute the function typically performed by script in web test, you need to accomplish it in coded web performance test or a web performance test plugin. Please see:
     How to: Create a Coded Web Performance Test
    How to: Create a Web Performance Test Plug-In
    I am not sure what the ‘some attribute on the page’ is. If you mean that you want to test those controls on the page, you can do coded UI test, which can test that the user interface for an application functions correctly. The coded UI test performs actions
    on the user interface controls for an application and verifies that the correct controls are displayed with the correct values. You can refer to this article for detailed information about code UI test:
    Verifying Code by Using Coded User Interface Tests
    Best regards,
    Amanda Zhu [MSFT]
    MSDN Community Support | Feedback to us
    Develop and promote your apps in Windows Store
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.

  • Log file sync top event during performance test -av 36ms

    Hi,
    During the performance test for our product before deployment into product i see "log file sync" on top with Avg wait (ms) being 36 which i feel is too high.
                                                               Avg
                                                              wait   % DB
    Event                                 Waits     Time(s)   (ms)   time Wait Class
    log file sync                       208,327       7,406     36   46.6 Commit
    direct path write                   646,833       3,604      6   22.7 User I/O
    DB CPU                                            1,599          10.1
    direct path read temp             1,321,596         619      0    3.9 User I/O
    log buffer space                      4,161         558    134    3.5 ConfiguratAlthough testers are not complaining about the performance of the appplication , we ,DBAs, are expected to be proactive about the any bad signals from DB.
    I am not able to figure out why "log file sync" is having such slow response.
    Below is the snapshot from the load profile.
                  Snap Id      Snap Time      Sessions Curs/Sess
    Begin Snap:    108127 16-May-13 20:15:22       105       6.5
      End Snap:    108140 16-May-13 23:30:29       156       8.9
       Elapsed:              195.11 (mins)
       DB Time:              265.09 (mins)
    Cache Sizes                       Begin        End
    ~~~~~~~~~~~                  ---------- ----------
                   Buffer Cache:     1,168M     1,136M  Std Block Size:         8K
               Shared Pool Size:     1,120M     1,168M      Log Buffer:    16,640K
    Load Profile              Per Second    Per Transaction   Per Exec   Per Call
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~         ---------------    --------------- ---------- ----------
          DB Time(s):                1.4                0.1       0.02       0.01
           DB CPU(s):                0.1                0.0       0.00       0.00
           Redo size:          607,512.1           33,092.1
       Logical reads:            3,900.4              212.5
       Block changes:            1,381.4               75.3
      Physical reads:              134.5                7.3
    Physical writes:              134.0                7.3
          User calls:              145.5                7.9
              Parses:               24.6                1.3
         Hard parses:                7.9                0.4
    W/A MB processed:          915,418.7           49,864.2
              Logons:                0.1                0.0
            Executes:               85.2                4.6
           Rollbacks:                0.0                0.0
        Transactions:               18.4Some of the top background wait events:
    ^LBackground Wait Events       DB/Inst: Snaps: 108127-108140
    -> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
    -> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
    -> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%.  Value of null is truly 0
                                                                 Avg
                                            %Time Total Wait    wait    Waits   % bg
    Event                             Waits -outs   Time (s)    (ms)     /txn   time
    log file parallel write         208,563     0      2,528      12      1.0   66.4
    db file parallel write            4,264     0        785     184      0.0   20.6
    Backup: sbtbackup                     1     0        516  516177      0.0   13.6
    control file parallel writ        4,436     0         97      22      0.0    2.6
    log file sequential read          6,922     0         95      14      0.0    2.5
    Log archive I/O                   6,820     0         48       7      0.0    1.3
    os thread startup                   432     0         26      60      0.0     .7
    Backup: sbtclose2                     1     0         10   10094      0.0     .3
    db file sequential read           2,585     0          8       3      0.0     .2
    db file single write                560     0          3       6      0.0     .1
    log file sync                        28     0          1      53      0.0     .0
    control file sequential re       36,326     0          1       0      0.2     .0
    log file switch completion            4     0          1     207      0.0     .0
    buffer busy waits                     5     0          1     116      0.0     .0
    LGWR wait for redo copy             924     0          1       1      0.0     .0
    log file single write                56     0          1       9      0.0     .0
    Backup: sbtinfo2                      1     0          1     500      0.0     .0During a previous perf test , things didnt look this bad for "log file sync. Few sections from the comparision report(awrddprt.sql)
    {code}
    Workload Comparison
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1st Per Sec 2nd Per Sec %Diff 1st Per Txn 2nd Per Txn %Diff
    DB time: 0.78 1.36 74.36 0.02 0.07 250.00
    CPU time: 0.18 0.14 -22.22 0.00 0.01 100.00
    Redo size: 573,678.11 607,512.05 5.90 15,101.84 33,092.08 119.13
    Logical reads: 4,374.04 3,900.38 -10.83 115.14 212.46 84.52
    Block changes: 1,593.38 1,381.41 -13.30 41.95 75.25 79.38
    Physical reads: 76.44 134.54 76.01 2.01 7.33 264.68
    Physical writes: 110.43 134.00 21.34 2.91 7.30 150.86
    User calls: 197.62 145.46 -26.39 5.20 7.92 52.31
    Parses: 7.28 24.55 237.23 0.19 1.34 605.26
    Hard parses: 0.00 7.88 100.00 0.00 0.43 100.00
    Sorts: 3.88 4.90 26.29 0.10 0.27 170.00
    Logons: 0.09 0.08 -11.11 0.00 0.00 0.00
    Executes: 126.69 85.19 -32.76 3.34 4.64 38.92
    Transactions: 37.99 18.36 -51.67
    First Second Diff
    1st 2nd
    Event Wait Class Waits Time(s) Avg Time(ms) %DB time Event Wait Class Waits Time(s) Avg Time
    (ms) %DB time
    SQL*Net more data from client Network 2,133,486 1,270.7 0.6 61.24 log file sync Commit 208,355 7,407.6
    35.6 46.57
    CPU time N/A 487.1 N/A 23.48 direct path write User I/O 646,849 3,604.7
    5.6 22.66
    log file sync Commit 99,459 129.5 1.3 6.24 log file parallel write System I/O 208,564 2,528.4
    12.1 15.90
    log file parallel write System I/O 100,732 126.6 1.3 6.10 CPU time N/A 1,599.3
    N/A 10.06
    SQL*Net more data to client Network 451,810 103.1 0.2 4.97 db file parallel write System I/O 4,264 784.7 1
    84.0 4.93
    -direct path write User I/O 121,044 52.5 0.4 2.53 -SQL*Net more data from client Network 7,407,435 279.7
    0.0 1.76
    -db file parallel write System I/O 986 22.8 23.1 1.10 -SQL*Net more data to client Network 2,714,916 64.6
    0.0 0.41
    {code}
    *To sum it sup:
    1. Why is the IO response getting such an hit during the new perf test? Please suggest*
    2. Does the number of DB writer impact "log file sync" wait event? We have only one DB writer as the number of cpu on the host is only 4
    {code}
    select *from v$version;
    BANNER
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
    PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
    CORE 11.1.0.7.0 Production
    TNS for HPUX: Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
    {code}
    Please let me know if you would like to see any other stats.
    Edited by: Kunwar on May 18, 2013 2:20 PM

    1. A snapshot interval of 3 hours always generates meaningless results
    Below are some details from the 1 hour interval AWR report.
    Platform                         CPUs Cores Sockets Memory(GB)
    HP-UX IA (64-bit)                   4     4       3      31.95
                  Snap Id      Snap Time      Sessions Curs/Sess
    Begin Snap:    108129 16-May-13 20:45:32       140       8.0
      End Snap:    108133 16-May-13 21:45:53       150       8.8
       Elapsed:               60.35 (mins)
       DB Time:              140.49 (mins)
    Cache Sizes                       Begin        End
    ~~~~~~~~~~~                  ---------- ----------
                   Buffer Cache:     1,168M     1,168M  Std Block Size:         8K
               Shared Pool Size:     1,120M     1,120M      Log Buffer:    16,640K
    Load Profile              Per Second    Per Transaction   Per Exec   Per Call
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~         ---------------    --------------- ---------- ----------
          DB Time(s):                2.3                0.1       0.03       0.01
           DB CPU(s):                0.1                0.0       0.00       0.00
           Redo size:          719,553.5           34,374.6
       Logical reads:            4,017.4              191.9
       Block changes:            1,521.1               72.7
      Physical reads:              136.9                6.5
    Physical writes:              158.3                7.6
          User calls:              167.0                8.0
              Parses:               25.8                1.2
         Hard parses:                8.9                0.4
    W/A MB processed:          406,220.0           19,406.0
              Logons:                0.1                0.0
            Executes:               88.4                4.2
           Rollbacks:                0.0                0.0
        Transactions:               20.9
    Top 5 Timed Foreground Events
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                                                               Avg
                                                              wait   % DB
    Event                                 Waits     Time(s)   (ms)   time Wait Class
    log file sync                        73,761       6,740     91   80.0 Commit
    log buffer space                      3,581         541    151    6.4 Configurat
    DB CPU                                              348           4.1
    direct path write                   238,962         241      1    2.9 User I/O
    direct path read temp               487,874         174      0    2.1 User I/O
    Background Wait Events       DB/Inst: Snaps: 108129-108133
    -> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
    -> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
    -> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%.  Value of null is truly 0
                                                                 Avg
                                            %Time Total Wait    wait    Waits   % bg
    Event                             Waits -outs   Time (s)    (ms)     /txn   time
    log file parallel write          61,049     0      1,891      31      0.8   87.8
    db file parallel write            1,590     0        251     158      0.0   11.6
    control file parallel writ        1,372     0         56      41      0.0    2.6
    log file sequential read          2,473     0         50      20      0.0    2.3
    Log archive I/O                   2,436     0         20       8      0.0     .9
    os thread startup                   135     0          8      60      0.0     .4
    db file sequential read             668     0          4       6      0.0     .2
    db file single write                200     0          2       9      0.0     .1
    log file sync                         8     0          1     152      0.0     .1
    log file single write                20     0          0      21      0.0     .0
    control file sequential re       11,218     0          0       0      0.1     .0
    buffer busy waits                     2     0          0     161      0.0     .0
    direct path write                     6     0          0      37      0.0     .0
    LGWR wait for redo copy             380     0          0       0      0.0     .0
    log buffer space                      1     0          0      89      0.0     .0
    latch: cache buffers lru c            3     0          0       1      0.0     .0     2 The log file sync is a result of commit --> you are committing too often, maybe even every individual record.
    Thanks for explanation. +Actually my question is WHY is it so slow (avg wait of 91ms)+3 Your IO subsystem hosting the online redo log files can be a limiting factor.
    We don't know anything about your online redo log configuration
    Below is my redo log configuration.
        GROUP# STATUS  TYPE    MEMBER                                                       IS_
             1         ONLINE  /oradata/fs01/PERFDB1/redo_1a.log                           NO
             1         ONLINE  /oradata/fs02/PERFDB1/redo_1b.log                           NO
             2         ONLINE  /oradata/fs01/PERFDB1/redo_2a.log                           NO
             2         ONLINE  /oradata/fs02/PERFDB1/redo_2b.log                           NO
             3         ONLINE  /oradata/fs01/PERFDB1/redo_3a.log                           NO
             3         ONLINE  /oradata/fs02/PERFDB1/redo_3b.log                           NO
    6 rows selected.
    04:13:14 perf_monitor@PERFDB1> col FIRST_CHANGE# for 999999999999999999
    04:13:26 perf_monitor@PERFDB1> select *from v$log;
        GROUP#    THREAD#  SEQUENCE#      BYTES    MEMBERS ARC STATUS                 FIRST_CHANGE# FIRST_TIME
             1          1      40689  524288000          2 YES INACTIVE              13026185905545 18-MAY-13 01:00
             2          1      40690  524288000          2 YES INACTIVE              13026185931010 18-MAY-13 03:32
             3          1      40691  524288000          2 NO  CURRENT               13026185933550 18-MAY-13 04:00Edited by: Kunwar on May 18, 2013 2:46 PM

  • How to setup the environment for doing the Performance Testing?

    Hi,
    We are planning to start the performance testing for iProcurement Product, Max number of user we are going to use 1000. For this simulation, what are all basic setups need to do for Application Tier, Database Tier,etc... Can anyone suggest what is procedure to setup environment depending upon the load?

    User Guides for thee rv120W are here:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/csbr/rv220w/quick_start/guide/rv220w_qsg.pdf
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/csbr/rv120w/administration/guide/rv120w_admin.pdf
    and theres some more stuff over on my site:
    http://www.linksysinfo.org/index.php?forums/cisco-small-business-routers-and-vpn-solutions.49/

  • Using Test Setting file to run web performance tests in different environments

    Hello,
    I have a set of web performance tests that I want to be able to run in different environments.
    Currently I have csv file containing the url of the load balancer of the particular environment I want to run the load test containing the web performance tests in, and to run it in a different environment I just edit this csv file.
    Is it possible to use the test settings file to point the web performance tests at a particular environment?
    I am using VSTS 2012 Ultimate.
    Thanks

    Instead of using the testsettings I suggest using the "Parameterize web servers" command (found via context menu on the web test, or via one of the icons). The left hand column then suggests context parameter names for the parameterised web server
    URLs. It should be possible to use data source entries instead. You may need to wrap the data source accesses in doubled curly braces if editing via the "Parameterize web servers" window.
    Regards
    Adrian

  • ActiveX Control recording but not playing back in a VS 2012 Web Performance Test

    I am testing an application that loads an Active X control for entering some login information. While recording, this control works fine and I am able to enter information and it is recorded. However on playback in the playback window it has the error "An
    add-on for this website failed to run. Check the security settings in Internet Options for potential conflicts."
    Window 7 OS 64 bit
    IE 8 recorded on 32 bit version
    I see no obvious security conflicts. This runs fine when navigating through manually and recording. It is only during playback where this error occurs.

    Hi IndyJason,
    Thank you for posting in MSDN forum.
    As you said that you could not playback the Active X control successfully in web performance test. I know that the ActiveX controls in your Web application will fall into three categories, depending on how they work at the HTTP level.
    Reference:
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms404678%28v=vs.110%29.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
    I found that this confusion may be come from the browser preview in the Web test result viewer. The Web Performance Test Results Viewer does not allow script or ActiveX controls to run, because the Web performance test engine does not run the, and for security
    reasons.
    For more information, please you refer to this follwoing blog(Web Tests Can Succeed Even Though It Appears They Failed Part):
    http://blogs.msdn.com/edglas/archive/2010/03/24/web-test-authoring-and-debugging-techniques-for-visual-studio-2010.aspx
    Best Regards,
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • [Ann] FirstACT 2.2 released for SOAP performance testing

    Empirix Releases FirstACT 2.2 for Performance Testing of SOAP-based Web Services
    FirstACT 2.2 is available for free evaluation immediately at http://www.empirix.com/TryFirstACT
    Waltham, MA -- June 5, 2002 -- Empirix Inc., the leading provider of test and monitoring
    solutions for Web, voice and network applications, today announced FirstACT™ 2.2,
    the fifth release of the industry's first and most comprehensive automated performance
    testing tool for Web Services.
    As enterprise organizations are beginning to adopt Web Services, the types of Web
    Services being developed and their testing needs is in a state of change. Major
    software testing solution vendor, Empirix is committed to ensuring that organizations
    developing enterprise software using Web Services can continue to verify the performance
    of their enterprise as quickly and cost effectively as possible regardless of the
    architecture they are built upon.
    Working with organizations developing Web Services, we have observed several emerging
    trends. First, organizations are tending to develop Web Services that transfer a
    sizable amount of data within each transaction by passing in user-defined XML data
    types as part of the SOAP request. As a result, they require a solution that automatically
    generates SOAP requests using XML data types and allows them to be quickly customized.
    Second, organizations require highly scalable test solutions. Many organizations
    are using Web Services to exchange information between business partners and have
    Service Level Agreements (SLAs) in place specifying guaranteed performance metrics.
    Organizations need to performance test to these SLAs to avoid financial and business
    penalties. Finally, many organizations just beginning to use automated testing tools
    for Web Services have already made significant investments in making SOAP scripts
    by hand. They would like to import SOAP requests into an automated testing tool
    for regression testing.
    Empirix FirstACT 2.2 meets or exceeds the testing needs of these emerging trends
    in Web Services testing by offering the following new functionality:
    1. Automatic and customizable test script generation for XML data types – FirstACT
    2.2 will generate complete test scripts and allow the user to graphically customize
    test data without requiring programming. FirstACT now includes a simple-to-use XML
    editor for data entry or more advanced SOAP request customization.
    2. Scalability Guarantee – FirstACT 2.2 has been designed to be highly scalable to
    performance test Web Services. Customers using FirstACT today regularly simulate
    between several hundred to several thousand users. Empirix will guarantee to
    performance test the numbers of users an organization needs to test to meet its business
    needs.
    3. Importing Existing Test Scripts – FirstACT 2.2 can now import existing SOAP request
    directly into the tool on a user-by-user basis. As a result, some users simulated
    can import SOAP requests; others can be automatically generated by FirstACT.
    Web Services facilitates the easy exchange of business-critical data and information
    across heterogeneous network systems. Gartner estimates that 75% of all businesses
    with more than $100 million in sales will have begun to develop Web Services applications
    or will have deployed a production system using Web Services technology by the end
    of 2002. As part of this move to Web Services, "vendors are moving forward with
    the technology and architecture elements underlying a Web Services application model,"
    Gartner reports. While this model holds exciting potential, the added protocol layers
    necessary to implement it can have a serious impact on application performance, causing
    delays in development and in the retrieval of information for end users.
    "Today Web Services play an increasingly prominent but changing role in the success
    of enterprise software projects, but they can only deliver on their promise if they
    perform reliably," said Steven Kolak, FirstACT product manager at Empirix. "With
    its graphical user interface and extensive test-case generation capability, FirstACT
    is the first Web Services testing tool that can be used by software developers or
    QA test engineers. FirstACT tests the performance and functionality of Web Services
    whether they are built upon J2EE, .NET, or other technologies. FirstACT 2.2 provides
    the most comprehensive Web Services testing solution that meets or exceeds the changing
    demands of organizations testing Web Services for performance, functionality, and
    functionality under load.”
    Learn more?
    Read about Empirix FirstACT at http://www.empirix.com/FirstACT. FirstACT 2.2 is
    available for free evaluation immediately at http://www.empirix.com/TryFirstACT.
    Pricing starts at $4,995. For additional information, call (781) 993-8500.

    Simon,
    I will admit, I almost never use SQL Developer. I have been a long time Toad user, but for this tool, I fumbled around a bit and got everything up and running quickly.
    That said, I tried the new GeoRaptor tool using this tutorial (which is I think is close enough to get the jist). http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/georaptor/index.php?title=A_Gentle_Introduction:_Create_Table,_Metadata_Registration,_Indexing_and_Mapping
    As I stumble around it, I'll try and leave some feedback, and probably ask some rather stupid questions.
    Thanks for the effort,
    Bryan

  • Performance test on MVC application

    Hi All,
    By using Visual Studio Performance tool, how can we test ASP.Net MVC application.
    When we open our MVC application basically it is loading very slow
    Can we get the below information by using Visual Studio Performance tool.
    1. How the controller is getting the input and passing it to the model for the retrieving the data.
    2. How can we see the performance of the controller passing the input to the service and getting the information and passing it to the view
    We want to the observe where exactly the delay is happening.
    We also have many java script functions written in the code.
    Please help me in providing the following information.
    Thanks
    Santosh

    Hi Santosh,
    Thanks for your post.
    Generally, I know that the VS Performance tool: load test is used to expect usage of a software program by simulating multiple users who access the program at the same time.
    The load test consist of a series of Web performance tests which operate under multiple simulated users over a period of time.
    For more information:
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/dd293540(v=vs.110).aspx
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn250793.aspx
    Load tests provide named counter sets, they are useful when you analyze performance counter data. The counter sets include ASP.NET, so when you create a load test with the Load Test Wizard, you add an initial set of counters.
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms404676.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms404704.aspx
    After you run this load test, you can use the load test analyzer to view your load test data and analyze your load test to locate bottlenecks, identify errors, and measure improvements in your application.
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee923686.aspx
    Best Regards,
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

Maybe you are looking for

  • WRT54GS problems connecting PS3 to PC Vista Basic network to enable Media server access

    I have a the above router and a new PS3.  I am trying to connect it to me Windows Vista PC so that I can use WMP11 as a media server. The PS3 is connector to the router with a wired connection and I have no problems with it connecting to the inter ne

  • Mount ISO in OS X?

    Hi folks. Just wondering if there is a way to mount and ISO image in OSX. If not, is there a program that can decompress it? Thanks.

  • ITunes 9 where do I find...?

    There is probably a simple answer to this stupid question. Since I installed iTunes 9 I can no longer find the app categories to browse. Can anyone tell me where I find the categories now. I can only see the apps on the home page.

  • Curve is messed up

    Hey guys, I've had my curve for quite some time now and just a few days ago it decided to crap out on me. The phone "works" but I can't work anything on the phone. The trackball scrolls while the screen is on but I can't click and the keyboard doesn'

  • Threads yielding;

    I'm new to this forum so I don't know if it's frowned upon to post lengthy(for me anyway!) code snippets. If it is tell me and I won't do it again. Anyway............. import java.awt.*; import javax.swing.*; import java.awt.event.*; import javax.swi