Performance test solution dedicated to MapViewer

Hi MapViewer users,
Recently, i've made a testing tool available dedicated to Oracle MapViewer (incl WMS).
Check out the site and try it: http://www.testnext.com
Thanks,
Jeroen

The message means that the MapViewer service did not response at the end point (URL) you provided. Make sure that MapViewer is running. To verify this, open a browser and paste your end point. This should bring you to the MapViewer web console. If the web console shows up, please set the support log option, test the end point again, and send the log file in the output directory to [email protected]
Thanks in advance,
Jeroen
ps. Please post your questions to support@testnext instead of the forum...

Similar Messages

How to best performance test OBPM 10.3g solutions?

Hi, is anyone aware of a framework that could be used for performance testing OBPM solutions?
Unlike normal SOA services which can be load tested using SOAP UI or a simple custom java client, BPM solutions could only be load/stress tested by having the process instances at various state in its life cycle.
Would highly appreciate any guidance/documentation?

LoadRunner is one of the more popular means of performance testing BPM....
[http://www8.hp.com/us/en/software/software-product.html?compURI=tcm:245-935779&pageTitle=loadrunner-software]

UI performance testing of pivot table

Hi,
I was wondering if anyone could direct me to a tool that I can use to do performance testing on a pivot table. I am populating a pivot table(declaratively) with a data source of over 100,000 cells and I need to record the browser rendering time of the pivot table using 50 or so parallel threads(requests). I tried running performance tests using JMeter, but that didn't help.
This is what I tried so far with JMeter:
I deployed the application in the integratedweblogicserver and specify the Url to hit in JMeter ( http://127.0.0.1:7101/PivotTableSample-ViewController-context-root/faces/Sample) and added a response assertion for the response code 200. Although I am able to hit the url successfully, the response I get is a javascript with a message that says "This is the loopback script to process the url before the real page loads. It introduces a separate round trip". When I checked in firebug, it looks like request redirect of some sort happens from this javascript to another Url (with some randomly generated parameters) which then returns the html response of the pivot table. I am unable to hit that Url directly as I get a message saying "session expired". It looks like a redirect happens from the first request and then session is created for that request and a redirect occurs.
I am able to check the browser rendering time of the pivot table in firebug (.net tab), but that is only for a single request. I'd appreciate it if anyone could guide me on this.
Thanks
Naveen

I found the link below that explains configuration of JMeter for performance testing of ADF applications(Although I couldn't find a solution to figure out the browser rendering time for parallel threads).
http://one-size-doesnt-fit-all.blogspot.com/2010/04/configuring-apache-jmeter-specifically.html
Edited by: Naveen Ramanathan on Oct 3, 2010 10:24 AM

How to setup the environment for doing the Performance Testing?

Hi,
We are planning to start the performance testing for iProcurement Product, Max number of user we are going to use 1000. For this simulation, what are all basic setups need to do for Application Tier, Database Tier,etc... Can anyone suggest what is procedure to setup environment depending upon the load?

User Guides for thee rv120W are here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/csbr/rv220w/quick_start/guide/rv220w_qsg.pdf
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/csbr/rv120w/administration/guide/rv120w_admin.pdf
and theres some more stuff over on my site:
http://www.linksysinfo.org/index.php?forums/cisco-small-business-routers-and-vpn-solutions.49/

[Ann] FirstACT 2.2 released for SOAP performance testing

Empirix Releases FirstACT 2.2 for Performance Testing of SOAP-based Web Services
FirstACT 2.2 is available for free evaluation immediately at http://www.empirix.com/TryFirstACT
Waltham, MA -- June 5, 2002 -- Empirix Inc., the leading provider of test and monitoring
solutions for Web, voice and network applications, today announced FirstACT™ 2.2,
the fifth release of the industry's first and most comprehensive automated performance
testing tool for Web Services.
As enterprise organizations are beginning to adopt Web Services, the types of Web
Services being developed and their testing needs is in a state of change. Major
software testing solution vendor, Empirix is committed to ensuring that organizations
developing enterprise software using Web Services can continue to verify the performance
of their enterprise as quickly and cost effectively as possible regardless of the
architecture they are built upon.
Working with organizations developing Web Services, we have observed several emerging
trends. First, organizations are tending to develop Web Services that transfer a
sizable amount of data within each transaction by passing in user-defined XML data
types as part of the SOAP request. As a result, they require a solution that automatically
generates SOAP requests using XML data types and allows them to be quickly customized.
Second, organizations require highly scalable test solutions. Many organizations
are using Web Services to exchange information between business partners and have
Service Level Agreements (SLAs) in place specifying guaranteed performance metrics.
Organizations need to performance test to these SLAs to avoid financial and business
penalties. Finally, many organizations just beginning to use automated testing tools
for Web Services have already made significant investments in making SOAP scripts
by hand. They would like to import SOAP requests into an automated testing tool
for regression testing.
Empirix FirstACT 2.2 meets or exceeds the testing needs of these emerging trends
in Web Services testing by offering the following new functionality:
1. Automatic and customizable test script generation for XML data types – FirstACT
2.2 will generate complete test scripts and allow the user to graphically customize
test data without requiring programming. FirstACT now includes a simple-to-use XML
editor for data entry or more advanced SOAP request customization.
2. Scalability Guarantee – FirstACT 2.2 has been designed to be highly scalable to
performance test Web Services. Customers using FirstACT today regularly simulate
between several hundred to several thousand users. Empirix will guarantee to
performance test the numbers of users an organization needs to test to meet its business
needs.
3. Importing Existing Test Scripts – FirstACT 2.2 can now import existing SOAP request
directly into the tool on a user-by-user basis. As a result, some users simulated
can import SOAP requests; others can be automatically generated by FirstACT.
Web Services facilitates the easy exchange of business-critical data and information
across heterogeneous network systems. Gartner estimates that 75% of all businesses
with more than $100 million in sales will have begun to develop Web Services applications
or will have deployed a production system using Web Services technology by the end
of 2002. As part of this move to Web Services, "vendors are moving forward with
the technology and architecture elements underlying a Web Services application model,"
Gartner reports. While this model holds exciting potential, the added protocol layers
necessary to implement it can have a serious impact on application performance, causing
delays in development and in the retrieval of information for end users.
"Today Web Services play an increasingly prominent but changing role in the success
of enterprise software projects, but they can only deliver on their promise if they
perform reliably," said Steven Kolak, FirstACT product manager at Empirix. "With
its graphical user interface and extensive test-case generation capability, FirstACT
is the first Web Services testing tool that can be used by software developers or
QA test engineers. FirstACT tests the performance and functionality of Web Services
whether they are built upon J2EE, .NET, or other technologies. FirstACT 2.2 provides
the most comprehensive Web Services testing solution that meets or exceeds the changing
demands of organizations testing Web Services for performance, functionality, and
functionality under load.”
Learn more?
Read about Empirix FirstACT at http://www.empirix.com/FirstACT. FirstACT 2.2 is
available for free evaluation immediately at http://www.empirix.com/TryFirstACT.
Pricing starts at $4,995. For additional information, call (781) 993-8500.

Simon,
I will admit, I almost never use SQL Developer. I have been a long time Toad user, but for this tool, I fumbled around a bit and got everything up and running quickly.
That said, I tried the new GeoRaptor tool using this tutorial (which is I think is close enough to get the jist). http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/georaptor/index.php?title=A_Gentle_Introduction:_Create_Table,_Metadata_Registration,_Indexing_and_Mapping
As I stumble around it, I'll try and leave some feedback, and probably ask some rather stupid questions.
Thanks for the effort,
Bryan

SAP Business Explorer Analyzer Performance testing

Hi, All
I don't have any experience in SAP at all. So maybe I will ask silly questions.
I was asked to provide performance testing for SAP Business Explorer Analyzer. As you know it is Excel base application with ActiveX control from SAP. HP Loadrunner doesn't support such configuration (It can only work with SAPGUI). So I am forced to search for other possible solutions. So maybe here I can get ideas and opinions about options:
1. I asked SAP admins about possibility to do the same things what users do from BEx (query execution + some drill down in data) in SAPGUI, maybe with predefined parameters or with additional customization. Unfortunately I've got an answer that it isn't possible at all. Is it really?
2. Another idea is to simulate what users do in BEx with VBA since anyway Excel interacts with BEx engine via DBA. There I met another problem. There is no any documentation about ActiveX components (e.g. com.sap.bi.et.analyzer.addin.BExConnect) or API used in BExAnalyzer.xla. The question is "is it possible or not to fully automate all data manipulation with VBA" and "Where can I get documentation about SAP VBA API?"
Thanks,
Alexander

You can run the queries with drilldown using transaction rsrt in list mode and interact via standard screen functions
This won't however give you the WAN or the presentation server overhead (ie formatting of the cells with excel wrappers of styles)
Read here for a testing example
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/60981d00-ca87-2910-fdb8-d4a2640d69d4?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true

How to have continouse performance testing during development phase?

I understand that for corporate projects there are always requirements like roughy how long it can take for certain process.
Is there any rough guideline as how much time certain process will take?
And is there anyway i can have something like JMeter that will do constant monitor of the performance as i start development?
Can go down to method level, but should also be able to show total time taken for a certain module or action etc.
I think it is somthing like continuous integration like cruise control..but is more for performance continouse evaluation..
Any advice anyone

Just a thought: how useful would continuous performance testing be? First off, I wouldn't have the main build include performance tests. What if the build fails on performance? It isn't necessarily something you'll fix quickly, so you could be stuck with a broken build for quite some time, which means either your devs won't be committing code, or they'll be comitting code on a broken build which kind-of negates the point of CI. So you'd have a nightly build for performance, or something. Then what? Someone comes in in the morning and sees the performance build failed, and fixes it? Hmmm, maybe your corporate culture is different, but we've got a nightly metrics build that sits broken for weeks on end before someone looks at it. As long as the master builds are OK, nobody cares. Given that performance problems might well take several weeks of dedicated time to fix, I reckon they're far more likely to be fixed as a result of failing acceptance tests, rather than the CI environment reporting them
Just my opinions, of course

SAP Performance Testing - Manual or Automated?

Our organization is attempting to develop a regular performance testing effort. Everything wehave read points to using a tool, such as LoadRunner, to do performance testing. However, we're just starting and simply want to baseline several transactions, jobs, programs, etc (less than 30 items). We have tools to monitor the backend results and grab metrics, but no tools to automate the testing itself. Does anyone do their performance testing manually? What are some advantages to doing this?

Hi Yogi,
I think HP LoadRunner is one of the best tools for SAP performance testing. I did it for many years. It is now included with Solution Manager. Here is the link for for HP Mercury regarding performance testing.
https://h10078.www1.hp.com/cda/hpms/display/main/hpms_content.jsp?zn=bto&cp=1-11-126_4000_100__
Please check this site as well, it has lot of valuable information.
http://www.wilsonmar.com/1loadrun.htm
Regards, Nabi.

SAP performance test, stress test using HP LoadRunner

Hi experts,
Our project is going to Go live soon, customer want to ensure about performance of SAP system and require some testing.
I am preparing HP LoadRunner script and perform a most complex scenario for stress test. But with performance test, we cannot perform because we do not have enough transaction data
Please advice me some solution for this case
Thanks & Best Regards,
Luong Doan

Hello,
If you are looking for simulating load using minimalist tools, a crude way to do this would be configuring Ecatt scripts and running them from multiple machines
But I think it doesn't work for web based transactions.
Regards,
Siddhesh

Oracle Lite Performance Testing

Hi All,
Is there a way to sync more than one client from the same PC/Laptop to simulate a concurrent sync for performance testing purposes? Greg Rekuonas did mention, some script available by Oracle Support for the same. Oracle (on raising an SR) unfortunately says that they cannot make that available to customers.
I have found a way out, but it involves changing one of olite's dll's and was wondering if anyone else knew a better solution.(Other than finding 50-100 different laptop's/handhelds and make them all synchronize one by one).
Cheers,
Vikrant

Hi Greg,
Thanks for the reply. I will try and re-raise it with them, though they have closed my SR with a "Not Entitled" status.
In case anyone is interested I finally, got the trick done by using the following:-
1) Open ocapi.dll in your $MOBILE_HOME/bin folder. (Right where the msync_java.dll is there)
2) Open the above file in a text editor like EditPlus(Note this is a binary file)
3) Search for the string OracleLiteSync.
4) Change the string to something else(Do not add any characters, just change any one alphabet).
5) Save this file as ocapi.dll in a different directory.
I wrote a standard java program, to programatically trigger a synchronization. To, handle concurrent synchronizations, I create multiple copies of ocapi.dll with different strings for OracleLiteSync.
Each of my simulation "Clients"(Basically Java Threads) were invoked with a different path each pointing to a different ocapi.dll. This seemed to work, and the "Mutex" error went away.
The exaplanation is that basically OracleLite uses the Kernel32 API CreateMutexA to create a mutex to ensure that two synchroninzations cannot happen on the same machine. The mutex name is OracleLiteSync and the code is in ocapi.dll.
By changing the mutex name and using a different version of ocapi.dll (Oracle Lite uses JNI which reads DLL from the PATH environment variable) you can fool Oracle Lite into doing different synchronizations.
This did give me some errors when it tried to apply the downloaded changes simultaneously in different ODB's, but allowed me to load the mobile server concurrently with syncrhonization sessions.
Cheers,
Vikrant

Performance testing using Adobe flash 9.0

Does anyone know a way to Performance test an application
that uses adobe flash player using an Automated tool such as Silk
Performer? I need to simulate 1000 virtual users streaming video
content. Silk Performer currently does not support Adobe flash. It
has support only for Real and Windows media player. Is there a way
of getting around this. Does anyone know how Adobe tests its flash
player ?

Please try the following. If you have questions or get stuck,
send me a 'private message' with your full name and contact info.
The number one reason that the ActiveX installer fails to
install on IE are due to incorrect permissions in the system
registry. We have solved hundreds of these Windows system
permissions with Microsoft’s SubInACL tool.
Note: This is strictly for Windows IE, these issues do not
occur on other browsers such as Firefox.
www.firefox.com
To fix these Windows system registry permission conflicts you
can use Microsoft’s SubInACL tool.
Warning: The following solution involves the Windows System
Registry. Editing or manipulating the registry incorrectly can
result in serious system damage which may require re-installation
of the operating system. If you are not comfortable editing the
registry, then take your system to a professional. If you choose to
proceed, then it is essential that you create a complete system
backup and a Windows System Restore Point before proceeding.
Please download Microsoft’s tool to your desktop.
http://www.supportflash.com/reset_min.zip
1. Login as the User that has the incorrect permissions in
the system registry
2. unzip the “reset_minimal.cmd” and the
“subinacl.exe” to the desktop
*** Make sure both files are on the desktop
3. Close out all applications
4. Run the “reset.cmd” file
5. It will open a DOS like terminal and start running through
registry keys
6. When it is finished it will say “press any key to
continue”
7. At this point you can download the latest Flash Player
from here:
www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer
Important Note: These online forums are for user-to-user
discussions of Adobe products, and are not an official customer
support channel for Adobe. If you require direct assistance, or
prefer to contact Adobe support staff directly, please contact
Adobe support.
http://www.adobe.com/support/contact/

Performance testing of servlets / beans / jsp ?

Hi. I'd like to performance test my applications, anyone have a clue on what software to use?
I use Fort� for Java CE 3 as the IDE and TomCat 3.23 as the servlet / jsp container.
Hopefully there are some opensource tools to use for this?
Regards,
Chris

You can precompile JSP's, this removes the small hickup when they are requested the first time (making the server translate and compile them). Check the documentation of your specific web/application server on how to do this.
Otherwise:
- buy better hardware
- use a better application server
- make sure your network is properly configured (so packets don't get routed around the network four times before they reach their destination for example)
- make sure your program logic doesn't create bottlenecks such as
unnecessary HTTP requests, redundant loops, etc.
- optimize your database access, use connection pooling
- optimize your database queries. Create indexes, make sure the SQL queries themselves aren't doing unnecessary trips around the database, etc.

Can Web Performance Test work on AJAX or Javascript Project which will show only one URL for all the pages?

Hi there,
I'm working on testing a AJAX and JavaScript Project which has several pages but all in the same URL. I need to test some attribute on the page or parameter past by AJAX or Javascript. Can Web Performance Test work to get what I want?
Thanks,

Hello,
Thank you for your post.
Web performance test is used to test if a server responses correctly and the response is consistent with what we expected. And we test the response speed, the stability and scalability.
The Web Performance Test Recorder records both AJAX requests and requests that were submitted from JavaScript, but
web test does not execute JavaScript. I am afraid that you can’t use web test to test parameter past by AJAX or JavaScript.
Please see:
Web Performance Test Engine Overview
About JavaScript and ActiveX Controls in Web Performance Tests
From the first link, “Client-side scripting that sets parameter values or results in additional HTTP requests, such as AJAX, does affect the load on the server and might require you to manually modify the Web Performance Test to simulate the scripting.”
If you want to execute the function typically performed by script in web test, you need to accomplish it in coded web performance test or a web performance test plugin. Please see:
How to: Create a Coded Web Performance Test
How to: Create a Web Performance Test Plug-In
I am not sure what the ‘some attribute on the page’ is. If you mean that you want to test those controls on the page, you can do coded UI test, which can test that the user interface for an application functions correctly. The coded UI test performs actions
on the user interface controls for an application and verifies that the correct controls are displayed with the correct values. You can refer to this article for detailed information about code UI test:
Verifying Code by Using Coded User Interface Tests
Best regards,
Amanda Zhu [MSFT]
MSDN Community Support | Feedback to us
Develop and promote your apps in Windows Store
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.

Performance Testing - Upgrade from 4.6B to ECC6.0

Hi,
We are doing an upgrade from SAP 4.6B to ECC6.0. I would like to know what would be the best approach for doing a performance test in an upgrade project. More specifically,
1. What are the main components that need to be tested for performance?
2. What are the important transaction codes/external applications (if any) that can be used to do performance testing in both 4.6B and ECC6.0? (ST05 or ST30 or something else?)
3. Any best practice recommended by SAP for doing performance tests?
Thanks in Advance,
Reena

> We are doing an upgrade from SAP 4.6B to ECC6.0. I would like to know what would be the best approach for doing a performance test in an upgrade project. More specifically,
>
> 1. What are the main components that need to be tested for performance?
Those components you use.
> 2. What are the important transaction codes/external applications (if any) that can be used to do performance testing in both 4.6B and ECC6.0? (ST05 or ST30 or something else?)
What is "important" for you?
Markus

Log file sync top event during performance test -av 36ms

Hi,
During the performance test for our product before deployment into product i see "log file sync" on top with Avg wait (ms) being 36 which i feel is too high.
                                                           Avg
                                                          wait   % DB
Event                                 Waits     Time(s)   (ms)   time Wait Class
log file sync                       208,327       7,406     36   46.6 Commit
direct path write                   646,833       3,604      6   22.7 User I/O
DB CPU                                            1,599          10.1
direct path read temp             1,321,596         619      0    3.9 User I/O
log buffer space                      4,161         558    134    3.5 ConfiguratAlthough testers are not complaining about the performance of the appplication , we ,DBAs, are expected to be proactive about the any bad signals from DB.
I am not able to figure out why "log file sync" is having such slow response.
Below is the snapshot from the load profile.
              Snap Id      Snap Time      Sessions Curs/Sess
Begin Snap:    108127 16-May-13 20:15:22       105       6.5
End Snap:    108140 16-May-13 23:30:29       156       8.9
   Elapsed:              195.11 (mins)
   DB Time:              265.09 (mins)
Cache Sizes                       Begin        End
~~~~~~~~~~~                  ---------- ----------
               Buffer Cache:     1,168M     1,136M Std Block Size:         8K
           Shared Pool Size:     1,120M     1,168M      Log Buffer:    16,640K
Load Profile              Per Second    Per Transaction   Per Exec   Per Call
~~~~~~~~~~~~         ---------------    --------------- ---------- ----------
      DB Time(s):                1.4                0.1       0.02       0.01
       DB CPU(s):                0.1                0.0       0.00       0.00
       Redo size:          607,512.1           33,092.1
   Logical reads:            3,900.4              212.5
   Block changes:            1,381.4               75.3
Physical reads:              134.5                7.3
Physical writes:              134.0                7.3
      User calls:              145.5                7.9
          Parses:               24.6                1.3
     Hard parses:                7.9                0.4
W/A MB processed:          915,418.7           49,864.2
          Logons:                0.1                0.0
        Executes:               85.2                4.6
       Rollbacks:                0.0                0.0
    Transactions:               18.4Some of the top background wait events:
^LBackground Wait Events       DB/Inst: Snaps: 108127-108140
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
                                                             Avg
                                        %Time Total Wait    wait    Waits   % bg
Event                             Waits -outs   Time (s)    (ms)     /txn   time
log file parallel write         208,563     0      2,528      12      1.0   66.4
db file parallel write            4,264     0        785     184      0.0   20.6
Backup: sbtbackup                     1     0        516 516177      0.0   13.6
control file parallel writ        4,436     0         97      22      0.0    2.6
log file sequential read          6,922     0         95      14      0.0    2.5
Log archive I/O                   6,820     0         48       7      0.0    1.3
os thread startup                   432     0         26      60      0.0     .7
Backup: sbtclose2                     1     0         10   10094      0.0     .3
db file sequential read           2,585     0          8       3      0.0     .2
db file single write                560     0          3       6      0.0     .1
log file sync                        28     0          1      53      0.0     .0
control file sequential re       36,326     0          1       0      0.2     .0
log file switch completion            4     0          1     207      0.0     .0
buffer busy waits                     5     0          1     116      0.0     .0
LGWR wait for redo copy             924     0          1       1      0.0     .0
log file single write                56     0          1       9      0.0     .0
Backup: sbtinfo2                      1     0          1     500      0.0     .0During a previous perf test , things didnt look this bad for "log file sync. Few sections from the comparision report(awrddprt.sql)
{code}
Workload Comparison
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1st Per Sec 2nd Per Sec %Diff 1st Per Txn 2nd Per Txn %Diff
DB time: 0.78 1.36 74.36 0.02 0.07 250.00
CPU time: 0.18 0.14 -22.22 0.00 0.01 100.00
Redo size: 573,678.11 607,512.05 5.90 15,101.84 33,092.08 119.13
Logical reads: 4,374.04 3,900.38 -10.83 115.14 212.46 84.52
Block changes: 1,593.38 1,381.41 -13.30 41.95 75.25 79.38
Physical reads: 76.44 134.54 76.01 2.01 7.33 264.68
Physical writes: 110.43 134.00 21.34 2.91 7.30 150.86
User calls: 197.62 145.46 -26.39 5.20 7.92 52.31
Parses: 7.28 24.55 237.23 0.19 1.34 605.26
Hard parses: 0.00 7.88 100.00 0.00 0.43 100.00
Sorts: 3.88 4.90 26.29 0.10 0.27 170.00
Logons: 0.09 0.08 -11.11 0.00 0.00 0.00
Executes: 126.69 85.19 -32.76 3.34 4.64 38.92
Transactions: 37.99 18.36 -51.67
First Second Diff
1st 2nd
Event Wait Class Waits Time(s) Avg Time(ms) %DB time Event Wait Class Waits Time(s) Avg Time
(ms) %DB time
SQL*Net more data from client Network 2,133,486 1,270.7 0.6 61.24 log file sync Commit 208,355 7,407.6
35.6 46.57
CPU time N/A 487.1 N/A 23.48 direct path write User I/O 646,849 3,604.7
5.6 22.66
log file sync Commit 99,459 129.5 1.3 6.24 log file parallel write System I/O 208,564 2,528.4
12.1 15.90
log file parallel write System I/O 100,732 126.6 1.3 6.10 CPU time N/A 1,599.3
N/A 10.06
SQL*Net more data to client Network 451,810 103.1 0.2 4.97 db file parallel write System I/O 4,264 784.7 1
84.0 4.93
-direct path write User I/O 121,044 52.5 0.4 2.53 -SQL*Net more data from client Network 7,407,435 279.7
0.0 1.76
-db file parallel write System I/O 986 22.8 23.1 1.10 -SQL*Net more data to client Network 2,714,916 64.6
0.0 0.41
{code}
*To sum it sup:
1. Why is the IO response getting such an hit during the new perf test? Please suggest*
2. Does the number of DB writer impact "log file sync" wait event? We have only one DB writer as the number of cpu on the host is only 4
{code}
select *from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
CORE 11.1.0.7.0 Production
TNS for HPUX: Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
{code}
Please let me know if you would like to see any other stats.
Edited by: Kunwar on May 18, 2013 2:20 PM

1. A snapshot interval of 3 hours always generates meaningless results
Below are some details from the 1 hour interval AWR report.
Platform                         CPUs Cores Sockets Memory(GB)
HP-UX IA (64-bit)                   4     4       3      31.95
              Snap Id      Snap Time      Sessions Curs/Sess
Begin Snap:    108129 16-May-13 20:45:32       140       8.0
End Snap:    108133 16-May-13 21:45:53       150       8.8
   Elapsed:               60.35 (mins)
   DB Time:              140.49 (mins)
Cache Sizes                       Begin        End
~~~~~~~~~~~                  ---------- ----------
               Buffer Cache:     1,168M     1,168M Std Block Size:         8K
           Shared Pool Size:     1,120M     1,120M      Log Buffer:    16,640K
Load Profile              Per Second    Per Transaction   Per Exec   Per Call
~~~~~~~~~~~~         ---------------    --------------- ---------- ----------
      DB Time(s):                2.3                0.1       0.03       0.01
       DB CPU(s):                0.1                0.0       0.00       0.00
       Redo size:          719,553.5           34,374.6
   Logical reads:            4,017.4              191.9
   Block changes:            1,521.1               72.7
Physical reads:              136.9                6.5
Physical writes:              158.3                7.6
      User calls:              167.0                8.0
          Parses:               25.8                1.2
     Hard parses:                8.9                0.4
W/A MB processed:          406,220.0           19,406.0
          Logons:                0.1                0.0
        Executes:               88.4                4.2
       Rollbacks:                0.0                0.0
    Transactions:               20.9
Top 5 Timed Foreground Events
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                                                           Avg
                                                          wait   % DB
Event                                 Waits     Time(s)   (ms)   time Wait Class
log file sync                        73,761       6,740     91   80.0 Commit
log buffer space                      3,581         541    151    6.4 Configurat
DB CPU                                              348           4.1
direct path write                   238,962         241      1    2.9 User I/O
direct path read temp               487,874         174      0    2.1 User I/O
Background Wait Events       DB/Inst: Snaps: 108129-108133
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
                                                             Avg
                                        %Time Total Wait    wait    Waits   % bg
Event                             Waits -outs   Time (s)    (ms)     /txn   time
log file parallel write          61,049     0      1,891      31      0.8   87.8
db file parallel write            1,590     0        251     158      0.0   11.6
control file parallel writ        1,372     0         56      41      0.0    2.6
log file sequential read          2,473     0         50      20      0.0    2.3
Log archive I/O                   2,436     0         20       8      0.0     .9
os thread startup                   135     0          8      60      0.0     .4
db file sequential read             668     0          4       6      0.0     .2
db file single write                200     0          2       9      0.0     .1
log file sync                         8     0          1     152      0.0     .1
log file single write                20     0          0      21      0.0     .0
control file sequential re       11,218     0          0       0      0.1     .0
buffer busy waits                     2     0          0     161      0.0     .0
direct path write                     6     0          0      37      0.0     .0
LGWR wait for redo copy             380     0          0       0      0.0     .0
log buffer space                      1     0          0      89      0.0     .0
latch: cache buffers lru c            3     0          0       1      0.0     .0     2 The log file sync is a result of commit --> you are committing too often, maybe even every individual record.
Thanks for explanation. +Actually my question is WHY is it so slow (avg wait of 91ms)+3 Your IO subsystem hosting the online redo log files can be a limiting factor.
We don't know anything about your online redo log configuration
Below is my redo log configuration.
    GROUP# STATUS TYPE    MEMBER                                                       IS_
         1         ONLINE /oradata/fs01/PERFDB1/redo_1a.log                           NO
         1         ONLINE /oradata/fs02/PERFDB1/redo_1b.log                           NO
         2         ONLINE /oradata/fs01/PERFDB1/redo_2a.log                           NO
         2         ONLINE /oradata/fs02/PERFDB1/redo_2b.log                           NO
         3         ONLINE /oradata/fs01/PERFDB1/redo_3a.log                           NO
         3         ONLINE /oradata/fs02/PERFDB1/redo_3b.log                           NO
6 rows selected.
04:13:14 perf_monitor@PERFDB1> col FIRST_CHANGE# for 999999999999999999
04:13:26 perf_monitor@PERFDB1> select *from v$log;
    GROUP#    THREAD# SEQUENCE#      BYTES    MEMBERS ARC STATUS                 FIRST_CHANGE# FIRST_TIME
         1          1      40689 524288000          2 YES INACTIVE              13026185905545 18-MAY-13 01:00
         2          1      40690 524288000          2 YES INACTIVE              13026185931010 18-MAY-13 03:32
         3          1      40691 524288000          2 NO CURRENT               13026185933550 18-MAY-13 04:00Edited by: Kunwar on May 18, 2013 2:46 PM

Performance test solution dedicated to MapViewer

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for