Performance with delete

Hello Experts i have an issue,
i have developed a small report where in the selection screen there are 2 buttons for insert and delete respectively.
i am inserting 100 records int0 a standard table,the table contains 1 crore records.
Now when i am deleteing the same 100 records it is taking much time and inse30 i can see the database utilization is more .
can anyone have solution for this.
Regards,
Badri.

Hi Bussu Badri,
try giving with max no.of parameters , like
      DELETE FROM STXH CLIENT SPECIFIED
       WHERE MANDT    = CLIENT
         AND TDOBJECT = OBJECT
         AND TDNAME   IN R_NAME                   " Range is specified , so as you can include more.
         AND TDID     IN R_ID
         AND TDSPRAS IN R_LANGUAGE.           " No.of parameters , depends on ur requirement
and here the rows are deleted permanently from the database table in the next database commit. Until then, you can cancel the deletion in a database rollback.
hope it might be helpfull
Regards,
Aby.

Similar Messages

Report performance with Hierarchies

Hi
How to improve query performance with hierarchies. We have to do lot of navigation's in the query and the volume of data size very big.
Thanks
P G

HI,
chk this:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/1955ba90-0201-0010-d3aa-8b2a4ef6bbb2
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/ce7fb368-0601-0010-64ba-fadc985a1f94
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/4c0ab590-0201-0010-bd9a-8332d8b4f09c
Query Performance Is "Aggregates" the way out for me?
/people/vikash.agrawal/blog/2006/04/17/query-performance-150-is-aggregates-the-way-out-for-me
° the OLAP cache is architected to store query result sets and to give all users access to those result sets.
If a user executes a query, the result set for that querys request can be stored in the OLAP cache; if that same query (or a derivative) is then executed by another user, the subsequent query request can be filled by accessing the result set already stored in the OLAP cache.
In this way, a query request filled from the OLAP cache is significantly faster than queries that receive their result set from database access
° The indexes that are created in the fact table for each dimension allow you to easily find and select the data
see http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/80/1a6473e07211d2acb80000e829fbfe/content.htm
° when you load data into the InfoCube, each request has its own request ID, which is included in the fact table in the packet dimension.
This (besides giving the possibility to manage/delete single request) increases the volume of data, and reduces performance in reporting, as the system has to aggregate with the request ID every time you execute a query. Using compressing, you can eliminate these disadvantages, and bring data from different requests together into one single request (request ID 0).
This function is critical, as the compressed data can no longer be deleted from the InfoCube using its request IDs and, logically, you must be absolutely certain that the data loaded into the InfoCube is correct.
see http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/ca/aa6437e7a4080ee10000009b38f842/content.htm
° by using partitioning you can split up the whole dataset for an InfoCube into several, smaller, physically independent and redundancy-free units. Thanks to this separation, performance is increased when reporting, or also when deleting data from the InfoCube.
see http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/33/dc2038aa3bcd23e10000009b38f8cf/content.htm
Hope it helps!
tHAK YOU,
dst

Report for update of Material with deletion Flag from R/3 to SRM

Hi All,
           Is any report for Updating material in SRM with deletion indicator for those deletion flag set in R/3...

Check material status
IF mat_mmsta EQ '--'.
    lv_msgv1 = iv_ordered_prod.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BBP_PD_MSG_ADD'
      EXPORTING
        i_msgty       = c_msgty_e
        i_msgid       = 'BBP_PD'
        i_msgno       = 426
        i_msgv1       = lv_msgv1
      EXCEPTIONS
        log_not_found = 1
        OTHERS        = 2.
    IF sy-subrc <> 0.
      PERFORM abort.
    ENDIF.
    IF c_on = c_off.
      MESSAGE e426(bbp_pd) WITH lv_msgv1.
    ENDIF.
ENDIF.
if not mat_lvorm is initial.
    lv_msgv1 = iv_ordered_prod.
    call function 'BBP_PD_MSG_ADD'
program name LBBP_PDIGPF2R
Check material in backend
CALL FUNCTION 'META_MATERIAL_READ'
    EXPORTING
      i_mtcom        = ls_mtcom_eci
      logical_system = iv_log_system
    IMPORTING
      e_mmsta        = mat_mmsta
      e_lvorm        = mat_lvorm
    EXCEPTIONS
      mat_not_found = 1
      OTHERS         = 2.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
    lv_msgv1 = iv_ordered_prod.
    lv_msgv2 = iv_plant.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BBP_PD_MSG_ADD'
      EXPORTING
        i_msgty       = c_msgty_e
        i_msgid       = 'BBP_PD'
        i_msgno       = 275
        i_msgv1       = lv_msgv1
        i_msgv2       = lv_msgv2
      EXCEPTIONS
        log_not_found = 1
        OTHERS        = 2.
    IF sy-subrc <> 0.
      PERFORM abort.
    ENDIF.
    IF c_on = c_off.
      MESSAGE e275(bbp_pd) WITH lv_msgv1 lv_msgv2.
    ENDIF.
ENDIF.
      EXPORTING
        i_msgty       = c_msgty_e
        i_msgid       = 'BBP_PD'
        i_msgno       = 345
      EXCEPTIONS
        log_not_found = 1
        others        = 2.
    if sy-subrc <> 0.
      perform abort.
    endif.
    if c_on = c_off.
IN SRM PROGRAM LBBP_PDIGPF2R BBP_PD 345 throws message "product x is designed for deletion"
but it is validationg from fm 'META_MATERIAL_READ'
please close this thread
br
muthu

Extremely slow performance with Radeon HD 7870

Hi,
I am using a number of Adobe programs on my new Windows 8 64 bit system, with 16 gigs of ram, an Intel Core i5 2.67ghz, and AMD Radeon HD 7870 2 gig. All the programs (including After Effects and Illustrator) work very well with the exception of Photoshop CS6 64 bit, which has extremely slow performance with Use Graphics Processor enabled in my preferences (which Photoshop selects by default). If I turn off Use Graphics Processor, the slow performance vanishes. If I change Drawing Mode to Basic, there might be a slightly detectable improvement over Normal and Advanced, but it's still horribly slow. The refresh rate seems to be just a few frames per second. Everything is slow: brushes, zooming, panning, everything.
I've tried changing the settings I've seen suggested elsewhere: I switched Cache levels to 2, history states to 10, and tile size to 128k. No effect. Photoshop is currently at the default of using 60% of available ram. Efficiency has remained at 100% throughout all my tests. Also, this slow performance has affected me from the moment I installed Photoshop; it didn't crop up after previous good performance. The problem exists regardless of the size or number of documents I have open. Performance is still terrible even when I create a 500 x 500 pixel blank new canvas and try a simple task like drawing with the brush.
Photoshop is fully up to date, and so are my graphics drivers (Catalyst version 13.1). Any help would be greatly appreciated; at the moment performance is so bad in Photoshop that it's unusable with graphics acceleration enabled. Thanks in advance for replying.
Photoshop System Info:
Adobe Photoshop Version: 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00) x64
Operating System: Windows 8 64-bit
Version: 6.2
System architecture: Intel CPU Family:6, Model:14, Stepping:5 with MMX, SSE Integer, SSE FP, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2
Physical processor count: 4
Processor speed: 2665 MHz
Built-in memory: 16379 MB
Free memory: 13443 MB
Memory available to Photoshop: 14697 MB
Memory used by Photoshop: 60 %
Image tile size: 128K
Image cache levels: 2
OpenGL Drawing: Enabled.
OpenGL Drawing Mode: Advanced
OpenGL Allow Normal Mode: True.
OpenGL Allow Advanced Mode: True.
OpenGL Allow Old GPUs: Not Detected.
OpenCL Version: 1.2 AMD-APP (1084.4)
OpenGL Version: 3.0
Video Rect Texture Size: 16384
OpenGL Memory: 2048 MB
Video Card Vendor: ATI Technologies Inc.
Video Card Renderer: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
Display: 1
Display Bounds: top=0, left=0, bottom=1080, right=1920
Video Card Number: 2
Video Card: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
Driver Version:
Driver Date:
Video Card Driver: aticfx64.dll,aticfx64.dll,aticfx64.dll,aticfx32,aticfx32,aticfx32,atiumd64.dll,atidxx64.d ll,atidxx64.dll,atiumdag,atidxx32,atidxx32,atiumdva,atiumd6a.cap,atitmm64.dll
Video Mode: 1920 x 1080 x 4294967296 colors
Video Card Caption: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
Video Card Memory: 2048 MB
Video Card Number: 1
Video Card: Microsoft Basic Render Driver
Driver Version: 9.12.0.0
Driver Date: 20121219000000.000000-000
Video Card Driver:
Video Mode:
Video Card Caption: Microsoft Basic Render Driver
Video Card Memory: 0 MB
Serial number: 90970078453021833509
Application folder: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS6 (64 Bit)\
Temporary file path: C:\Users\RAFFAE~1\AppData\Local\Temp\
Photoshop scratch has async I/O enabled
Scratch volume(s):
C:\, 931.5G, 534.8G free
Required Plug-ins folder: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS6 (64 Bit)\Required\
Primary Plug-ins folder: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS6 (64 Bit)\Plug-ins\
Additional Plug-ins folder: not set
Installed components:
   ACE.dll   ACE 2012/06/05-15:16:32   66.507768   66.507768
   adbeape.dll   Adobe APE 2012/01/25-10:04:55   66.1025012   66.1025012
   AdobeLinguistic.dll   Adobe Linguisitc Library   6.0.0
   AdobeOwl.dll   Adobe Owl 2012/09/10-12:31:21   5.0.4   79.517869
   AdobePDFL.dll   PDFL 2011/12/12-16:12:37   66.419471   66.419471
   AdobePIP.dll   Adobe Product Improvement Program   7.0.0.1686
   AdobeXMP.dll   Adobe XMP Core 2012/02/06-14:56:27   66.145661   66.145661
   AdobeXMPFiles.dll   Adobe XMP Files 2012/02/06-14:56:27   66.145661   66.145661
   AdobeXMPScript.dll   Adobe XMP Script 2012/02/06-14:56:27   66.145661   66.145661
   adobe_caps.dll   Adobe CAPS   6,0,29,0
   AGM.dll   AGM 2012/06/05-15:16:32   66.507768   66.507768
   ahclient.dll    AdobeHelp Dynamic Link Library   1,7,0,56
   aif_core.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
   aif_ocl.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
   aif_ogl.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
   amtlib.dll   AMTLib (64 Bit)   6.0.0.75 (BuildVersion: 6.0; BuildDate: Mon Jan 16 2012 18:00:00)   1.000000
   ARE.dll   ARE 2012/06/05-15:16:32   66.507768   66.507768
   AXE8SharedExpat.dll   AXE8SharedExpat 2011/12/16-15:10:49   66.26830   66.26830
   AXEDOMCore.dll   AXEDOMCore 2011/12/16-15:10:49   66.26830   66.26830
   Bib.dll   BIB 2012/06/05-15:16:32   66.507768   66.507768
   BIBUtils.dll   BIBUtils 2012/06/05-15:16:32   66.507768   66.507768
   boost_date_time.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   boost_signals.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   boost_system.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   boost_threads.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   cg.dll   NVIDIA Cg Runtime   3.0.00007
   cgGL.dll   NVIDIA Cg Runtime   3.0.00007
   CIT.dll   Adobe CIT   2.1.0.20577   2.1.0.20577
   CoolType.dll   CoolType 2012/06/05-15:16:32   66.507768   66.507768
   data_flow.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
   dvaaudiodevice.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   dvacore.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   dvamarshal.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   dvamediatypes.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   dvaplayer.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   dvatransport.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   dvaunittesting.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   dynamiclink.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   ExtendScript.dll   ExtendScript 2011/12/14-15:08:46   66.490082   66.490082
   FileInfo.dll   Adobe XMP FileInfo 2012/01/17-15:11:19   66.145433   66.145433
   filter_graph.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
   hydra_filters.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
   icucnv40.dll   International Components for Unicode 2011/11/15-16:30:22    Build gtlib_3.0.16615
   icudt40.dll   International Components for Unicode 2011/11/15-16:30:22    Build gtlib_3.0.16615
   image_compiler.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
   image_flow.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
   image_runtime.dll   AIF   3.0   62.490293
   JP2KLib.dll   JP2KLib 2011/12/12-16:12:37   66.236923   66.236923
   libifcoremd.dll   Intel(r) Visual Fortran Compiler   10.0 (Update A)
   libmmd.dll   Intel(r) C Compiler, Intel(r) C++ Compiler, Intel(r) Fortran Compiler   12.0
   LogSession.dll   LogSession   2.1.2.1681
   mediacoreif.dll   DVA Product   6.0.0
   MPS.dll   MPS 2012/02/03-10:33:13   66.495174   66.495174
   msvcm80.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2005   8.00.50727.6910
   msvcm90.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2008   9.00.30729.1
   msvcp100.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2010   10.00.40219.1
   msvcp80.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2005   8.00.50727.6910
   msvcp90.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2008   9.00.30729.1
   msvcr100.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2010   10.00.40219.1
   msvcr80.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2005   8.00.50727.6910
   msvcr90.dll   Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2008   9.00.30729.1
   pdfsettings.dll   Adobe PDFSettings   1.04
   Photoshop.dll   Adobe Photoshop CS6   CS6
   Plugin.dll   Adobe Photoshop CS6   CS6
   PlugPlug.dll   Adobe(R) CSXS PlugPlug Standard Dll (64 bit)   3.0.0.383
   PSArt.dll   Adobe Photoshop CS6   CS6
   PSViews.dll   Adobe Photoshop CS6   CS6
   SCCore.dll   ScCore 2011/12/14-15:08:46   66.490082   66.490082
   ScriptUIFlex.dll   ScriptUIFlex 2011/12/14-15:08:46   66.490082   66.490082
   svml_dispmd.dll   Intel(r) C Compiler, Intel(r) C++ Compiler, Intel(r) Fortran Compiler   12.0
   tbb.dll   Intel(R) Threading Building Blocks for Windows   3, 0, 2010, 0406
   tbbmalloc.dll   Intel(R) Threading Building Blocks for Windows   3, 0, 2010, 0406
   updaternotifications.dll   Adobe Updater Notifications Library   6.0.0.24 (BuildVersion: 1.0; BuildDate: BUILDDATETIME)   6.0.0.24
   WRServices.dll   WRServices Friday January 27 2012 13:22:12   Build 0.17112   0.17112
Required plug-ins:
   3D Studio 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Accented Edges 13.0
   Adaptive Wide Angle 13.0
   Angled Strokes 13.0
   Average 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Bas Relief 13.0
   BMP 13.0
   Camera Raw 7.3
   Chalk & Charcoal 13.0
   Charcoal 13.0
   Chrome 13.0
   Cineon 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Clouds 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Collada 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Color Halftone 13.0
   Colored Pencil 13.0
   CompuServe GIF 13.0
   Conté Crayon 13.0
   Craquelure 13.0
   Crop and Straighten Photos 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Crop and Straighten Photos Filter 13.0
   Crosshatch 13.0
   Crystallize 13.0
   Cutout 13.0
   Dark Strokes 13.0
   De-Interlace 13.0
   Dicom 13.0
   Difference Clouds 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Diffuse Glow 13.0
   Displace 13.0
   Dry Brush 13.0
   Eazel Acquire 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Embed Watermark 4.0
   Entropy 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Extrude 13.0
   FastCore Routines 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Fibers 13.0
   Film Grain 13.0
   Filter Gallery 13.0
   Flash 3D 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Fresco 13.0
   Glass 13.0
   Glowing Edges 13.0
   Google Earth 4 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Grain 13.0
   Graphic Pen 13.0
   Halftone Pattern 13.0
   HDRMergeUI 13.0
   IFF Format 13.0
   Ink Outlines 13.0
   JPEG 2000 13.0
   Kurtosis 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Lens Blur 13.0
   Lens Correction 13.0
   Lens Flare 13.0
   Liquify 13.0
   Matlab Operation 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Maximum 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Mean 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Measurement Core 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Median 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Mezzotint 13.0
   Minimum 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   MMXCore Routines 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Mosaic Tiles 13.0
   Multiprocessor Support 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Neon Glow 13.0
   Note Paper 13.0
   NTSC Colors 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Ocean Ripple 13.0
   Oil Paint 13.0
   OpenEXR 13.0
   Paint Daubs 13.0
   Palette Knife 13.0
   Patchwork 13.0
   Paths to Illustrator 13.0
   PCX 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Photocopy 13.0
   Photoshop 3D Engine 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Picture Package Filter 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Pinch 13.0
   Pixar 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Plaster 13.0
   Plastic Wrap 13.0
   PNG 13.0
   Pointillize 13.0
   Polar Coordinates 13.0
   Portable Bit Map 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Poster Edges 13.0
   Radial Blur 13.0
   Radiance 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Range 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Read Watermark 4.0
   Reticulation 13.0
   Ripple 13.0
   Rough Pastels 13.0
   Save for Web 13.0
   ScriptingSupport 13.1.2
   Shear 13.0
   Skewness 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Smart Blur 13.0
   Smudge Stick 13.0
   Solarize 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Spatter 13.0
   Spherize 13.0
   Sponge 13.0
   Sprayed Strokes 13.0
   Stained Glass 13.0
   Stamp 13.0
   Standard Deviation 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   STL 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Sumi-e 13.0
   Summation 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Targa 13.0
   Texturizer 13.0
   Tiles 13.0
   Torn Edges 13.0
   Twirl 13.0
   Underpainting 13.0
   Vanishing Point 13.0
   Variance 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Variations 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Water Paper 13.0
   Watercolor 13.0
   Wave 13.0
   Wavefront|OBJ 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   WIA Support 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   Wind 13.0
   Wireless Bitmap 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
   ZigZag 13.0
Optional and third party plug-ins:
   DAZ Studio 3D Bridge 12.0
   DazUpdateScene 12.0
Plug-ins that failed to load: NONE
Flash:
   Mini Bridge
   Kuler
Installed TWAIN devices: NONE

Great news!
I followed your suggestion, Noel, and uninstalled my drivers with the Catalyst Uninstall Utility (which I hadn't used before), rebooted, reinstalled Catalyst 13.2 Beta 7, rebooted, deleted the PS Prefs, started PS, and now the performance is radically improved!
It baffles me why I would need to do a clean driver uninstall in a new system environment that has only ever had this video card, and is only a few months old, but that action seems to be what's improved the situation. Note that because I deleted the PS preferences, the good performance now occurs with the default Use Graphics Processor enabled, and Drawing Mode set to Advanced (with every feature in the Advanced dialog checked except 30bit display).
Having no reference point, I can't tell for sure if performance is as good as it theoretically ought to be for my system specs, but using the standard 13px brush is only slightly laggy behind the cursor, even if I become reckless and squiggle on the canvas violently. It wasn't just sluggish response before: Photoshop seemed to be in pain trying to draw the line segments as it laboured to catch up to the cursor. That is pretty much gone now.
Much more tellingly, zooming and panning the canvas is like it ought to be, responsive and clean, more or less like it was for me in CS4 with my old Nvidia 9600GT. The poor performance with zooming and panning was the most worrying aspect of the issue. It's a great relief to see these working more properly now.
I have to confess I'm a little embarrassed to have drug you through all this hassle only to discover that something as rudimentary as properly cleaning out the drivers would be the apparent solution. I never would have imagined that doing that, with such a new and stable system, would make any difference, since I don't have a legacy of older drivers dotting my hard drive. In any event, I'm really grateful that you guys took the time to try to help me.
In the interest of completeness, here's the relevant portion of my system info after doing the reinstall steps I mentioned above:
Adobe Photoshop Version: 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00) x64
Operating System: Windows 8 64-bit
Version: 6.2
System architecture: Intel CPU Family:6, Model:14, Stepping:5 with MMX, SSE Integer, SSE FP, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2
Physical processor count: 4
Processor speed: 2665 MHz
Built-in memory: 16379 MB
Free memory: 13680 MB
Memory available to Photoshop: 14695 MB
Memory used by Photoshop: 60 %
Image tile size: 1024K
Image cache levels: 4
OpenGL Drawing: Enabled.
OpenGL Drawing Mode: Advanced
OpenGL Allow Normal Mode: True.
OpenGL Allow Advanced Mode: True.
OpenGL Allow Old GPUs: Not Detected.
OpenCL Version: 3.0
OpenGL Version: 3.0
Video Rect Texture Size: 16384
OpenGL Memory: 2048 MB
Video Card Vendor: ATI Technologies Inc.
Video Card Renderer: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
Display: 1
Display Bounds: top=0, left=0, bottom=1080, right=1920
Video Card Number: 2
Video Card: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
Driver Version:
Driver Date:
Video Card Driver: aticfx64.dll,aticfx64.dll,aticfx64.dll,aticfx32,aticfx32,aticfx32,atiumd64.dll,atidxx64.d ll,atidxx64.dll,atiumdag,atidxx32,atidxx32,atiumdva,atiumd6a.cap,atitmm64.dll
Video Mode: 1920 x 1080 x 4294967296 colors
Video Card Caption: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
Video Card Memory: 2048 MB
Video Card Number: 1
Video Card: Microsoft Basic Render Driver
Driver Version: 12.100.17.0
Driver Date: 20130226000000.000000-000
Video Card Driver:
Video Mode:
Video Card Caption: Microsoft Basic Render Driver
Video Card Memory: 0 MB
As you can see, the Microsoft Basic Render Driver still appears as a Video Card in the list. This presumably has something to do with Windows 8, and I really don't know if its presence here is still a sign that my card is not being used to its optimal capability. I have a hunch that the slight lag that I am still experiencing with the brush when Use Graphics Processor is on -- totally absent with the acceleration turned off -- implies that Photoshop is still unable to take maximum advantage of my card. I would assume that the brush tool should be more responsive with acceleration on than off, in a rig without any issues, but that's just assumption on my part. If you turn off Use Graphics Processor on your systems, is the brush tool more or less responsive?
But again, panning the canvas with the hand tool is now extremely responsive, without any screen tearing or visible lag, and that's a massive improvement over the total meltdown of performance I was suffering from before.
Thanks again very much for your help. I'm grateful to all of you who took the time to chime in.

Issue with Delete Index in process chain

Hi All,
I have a situation with Delete Index in my process chain.
Delete Index step, before loading data to cube, is taking around 2Hr to complete but some times it completes within 5 mins.
Anyone faces such issue? If yes, how can I fix it?
Thanks and Regards,
Alok

Hi,
If Statistics are not maintained for the cube then also it might casue the high run time in index deletion.
if its urgent then, can u try doing it manually form performance tab....
or once process chain step is complete, create statistics for the cube. Next run should take less time
Please try.
Regards,
Gaurav

ORA-01456 : may not perform insert/delete/update operation

When I use following stored procedure with crystal reports, following error occurs.
ORA-01456 : may not perform insert/delete/update operation inside a READ ONLY transaction
Kindly help me on this, please.
My stored procedure is as under:-
create or replace
PROCEDURE PROC_FIFO
(CV IN OUT TB_DATA.CV_TYPE,FDATE1 DATE, FDATE2 DATE,
MSHOLD_CODE IN NUMBER,SHARE_ACCNO IN VARCHAR)
IS
--DECLARE VARIABLES
V_QTY NUMBER(10):=0;
V_RATE NUMBER(10,2):=0;
V_AMOUNT NUMBER(12,2):=0;
V_DATE DATE:=NULL;
--DECLARE CURSORS
CURSOR P1 IS
SELECT *
FROM FIFO
WHERE SHARE_TYPE IN ('P','B','R')
ORDER BY VOUCHER_DATE,
CASE WHEN SHARE_TYPE='P' THEN 1
ELSE
CASE WHEN SHARE_TYPE='R' THEN 2
ELSE
CASE WHEN SHARE_TYPE='B' THEN 3
END
END
END,
TRANS_NO;
RECP P1%ROWTYPE;
CURSOR S1 IS
SELECT * FROM FIFO
WHERE SHARE_TYPE='S'
AND TRANS_COST IS NULL
ORDER BY VOUCHER_DATE,TRANS_NO;
RECS S1%ROWTYPE;
--BEGIN QUERIES
BEGIN
DELETE FROM FIFO;
--OPENING BALANCES
INSERT INTO FIFO
VOUCHER_NO,VOUCHER_TYPE,VOUCHER_DATE,TRANS_QTY,TRANS_AMT,TRANS_RATE,
SHOLD_CODE,SHARE_TYPE,ACC_NO,SHARE_CODE,TRANS_NO)
SELECT TO_CHAR(FDATE1,'YYYYMM')||'001' VOUCHER_NO,'OP' VOUCHER_TYPE,
FDATE1-1 VOUCHER_DATE,
SUM(
CASE WHEN
--((SHARE_TYPE ='S' AND DTAG='Y')
SHARE_TYPE IN ('P','B','R','S') THEN
TRANS_QTY
ELSE
0
END
) TRANS_QTY,
SUM(TRANS_AMT),
NVL(CASE WHEN SUM(TRANS_AMT)<>0
AND
SUM
CASE WHEN SHARE_TYPE IN ('P','B','R','S') THEN
TRANS_QTY
ELSE
0
END
)<>0 THEN
SUM(TRANS_AMT)/
SUM
CASE WHEN SHARE_TYPE IN ('P','B','R','S') THEN
TRANS_QTY
ELSE
0
END
) END,0) TRANS_RATE,
MSHOLD_CODE SHOLD_CODE,'P' SHARE_TYPE,SHARE_ACCNO ACC_NO,
SHARE_CODE,0 TRANS_NO
FROM TRANS
WHERE ACC_NO=SHARE_ACCNO
AND SHOLD_CODE= MSHOLD_CODE
AND VOUCHER_DATE<FDATE1
--AND
--(SHARE_TYPE='S' AND DTAG='Y')
--OR SHARE_TYPE IN ('P','R','B'))
group by TO_CHAR(FDATE1,'YYYYMM')||'001', MSHOLD_CODE,SHARE_ACCNO, SHARE_CODE;
COMMIT;
--TRANSACTIONS BETWEEND DATES
INSERT INTO FIFO
TRANS_NO,VOUCHER_NO,VOUCHER_TYPE,
VOUCHER_DATE,TRANS_QTY,
TRANS_RATE,TRANS_AMT,SHOLD_CODE,SHARE_CODE,ACC_NO,
DTAG,TRANS_COST,SHARE_TYPE
SELECT TRANS_NO,VOUCHER_NO,VOUCHER_TYPE,
VOUCHER_DATE,TRANS_QTY,
CASE WHEN SHARE_TYPE='S' THEN
NVL(TRANS_RATE-COMM_PER_SHARE,0)
ELSE
NVL(TRANS_RATE+COMM_PER_SHARE,0)
END
,TRANS_AMT,SHOLD_CODE,SHARE_CODE,ACC_NO,
DTAG,NULL TRANS_COST,SHARE_TYPE
FROM TRANS
WHERE ACC_NO=SHARE_ACCNO
AND SHOLD_CODE= MSHOLD_CODE
AND VOUCHER_DATE BETWEEN FDATE1 AND FDATE2
AND
((SHARE_TYPE='S' AND DTAG='Y')
OR SHARE_TYPE IN ('P','R','B'));
COMMIT;
--PURCHASE CURSOR
IF P1%ISOPEN THEN
CLOSE P1;
END IF;
OPEN P1;
LOOP
FETCH P1 INTO RECP;
V_QTY:=RECP.TRANS_QTY;
V_RATE:=RECP.TRANS_RATE;
V_DATE:=RECP.VOUCHER_DATE;
dbms_output.put_line('V_RATE OPENING:'||V_RATE);
dbms_output.put_line('OP.QTY2:'||V_QTY);
EXIT WHEN P1%NOTFOUND;
--SALES CURSOR
IF S1%ISOPEN THEN
CLOSE S1;
END IF;
OPEN S1;
LOOP
FETCH S1 INTO RECS;
EXIT WHEN S1%NOTFOUND;
dbms_output.put_line('OP.QTY:'||V_QTY);
dbms_output.put_line('SOLD:'||RECS.TRANS_QTY);
dbms_output.put_line('TRANS_NO:'||RECS.TRANS_NO);
dbms_output.put_line('TRANS_NO:'||RECS.TRANS_NO);
IF ABS(RECS.TRANS_QTY)<=V_QTY
AND V_QTY<>0
AND RECS.TRANS_COST IS NULL THEN
--IF RECS.TRANS_COST IS NULL THEN
--dbms_output.put_line('SOLD:'||RECS.TRANS_QTY);
--dbms_output.put_line('BAL1:'||V_QTY);
UPDATE FIFO
SET TRANS_COST=V_RATE,
PUR_DATE=V_DATE
WHERE TRANS_NO=RECS.TRANS_NO
AND TRANS_COST IS NULL;
COMMIT;
dbms_output.put_line('UPDATE TRANS_NO:'||RECS.TRANS_NO);
dbms_output.put_line('OP.QTY:'||V_QTY);
dbms_output.put_line('SOLD:'||RECS.TRANS_QTY);
dbms_output.put_line('TRANS_NO:'||RECS.TRANS_NO);
dbms_output.put_line('BAL2:'||TO_CHAR(RECS.TRANS_QTY+V_QTY));
END IF;
IF ABS(RECS.TRANS_QTY)>ABS(V_QTY)
AND V_QTY<>0 AND RECS.TRANS_COST IS NULL THEN
UPDATE FIFO
SET
TRANS_QTY=-V_QTY,
TRANS_COST=V_RATE,
TRANS_AMT=ROUND(V_QTY*V_RATE,2),
PUR_DATE=V_DATE
WHERE TRANS_NO=RECS.TRANS_NO;
--AND TRANS_COST IS NULL;
COMMIT;
dbms_output.put_line('UPDATING 100000:'||TO_CHAR(V_QTY));
dbms_output.put_line('UPDATING 100000 TRANS_NO:'||TO_CHAR(RECS.TRANS_NO));
INSERT INTO FIFO
TRANS_NO,VOUCHER_NO,VOUCHER_TYPE,
VOUCHER_DATE,TRANS_QTY,
TRANS_RATE,TRANS_AMT,SHOLD_CODE,SHARE_CODE,ACC_NO,
DTAG,TRANS_COST,SHARE_TYPE,PUR_DATE
VALUES
MCL.NEXTVAL,RECS.VOUCHER_NO,RECS.VOUCHER_TYPE,
RECS.VOUCHER_DATE,RECS.TRANS_QTY+V_QTY,
RECS.TRANS_RATE,(RECS.TRANS_QTY+V_QTY)*RECS.TRANS_RATE,RECS.SHOLD_CODE,
RECS.SHARE_CODE,RECS.ACC_NO,
RECS.DTAG,NULL,'S',V_DATE
dbms_output.put_line('INSERTED RECS.QTY:'||TO_CHAR(RECS.TRANS_QTY));
dbms_output.put_line('INSERTED QTY:'||TO_CHAR(RECS.TRANS_QTY+V_QTY));
dbms_output.put_line('INSERTED V_QTY:'||TO_CHAR(V_QTY));
dbms_output.put_line('INSERTED RATE:'||TO_CHAR(V_RATE));
COMMIT;
V_QTY:=0;
V_RATE:=0;
EXIT;
END IF;
IF V_QTY>0 THEN
V_QTY:=V_QTY+RECS.TRANS_QTY;
ELSE
V_QTY:=0;
V_RATE:=0;
EXIT;
END IF;
--dbms_output.put_line('BAL3:'||V_QTY);
END LOOP;
V_QTY:=0;
V_RATE:=0;
END LOOP;
CLOSE S1;
CLOSE P1;
OPEN CV FOR
SELECT TRANS_NO,VOUCHER_NO,VOUCHER_TYPE,
VOUCHER_DATE,TRANS_QTY,
TRANS_RATE,TRANS_AMT,SHOLD_CODE,B.SHARE_CODE,B.ACC_NO,
DTAG,TRANS_COST,SHARE_TYPE, B.SHARE_NAME,A.PUR_DATE
FROM FIFO A, SHARES B
WHERE A.SHARE_CODE=B.SHARE_CODE
--AND A.SHARE_TYPE IS NOT NULL
ORDER BY VOUCHER_DATE,SHARE_TYPE,TRANS_NO;
END PROC_FIFO;
Thanks and Regards,
Luqman

Copy from TODOEXPERTOS.COM
Problem Description
When running a RAM build you get the following error as seen in the RAM build
log file:
14:52:50 2> Updating warehouse tables with build information...
Process Terminated In Error:
[Oracle][ODBC][Ora]ORA-01456: may not perform insert/delete/update operation inside a READ ONLY transaction
(SIGENG02) ([Oracle][ODBC][Ora]ORA-01456: may not perform insert/delete/update operation inside a READ ONLY transaction
) Please contact the administrator of your Oracle Express Server application.
Solution Description
Here are the following suggestions to try out:
1. You may want to use oci instead of odbc for your RAM build, provided you
are running an Oracle database. This is setup through the RAA (relational access
administrator) maintenance procedure.
Also make sure your tnsnames.ora file is setup correctly in either net80/admin
or network/admin directory, to point to the correct instance of Oracle.
2. Commit or rollback the current transaction, then retry running your
RAM build. Seems like one or more of your lookup or fact tables have a
read-only lock on them. This occurs if you modify or add some records to your
lookup or fact tables but forget to issue a commit or rollback. You need to do
this through SQL+.
3. You may need to check what permissions has been given to the relational user.
The error could be a permissions issue.
You must give 'connect' permission or roll to the RAM/relational user. You may
also try giving 'dba' and 'resource' priviliges/roll to this user as a test. Inorder to
keep it simple, make sure all your lookup, fact and wh_ tables are created on
a single new tablespace. Create a new user with the above privileges as the
owner of the tablespace, as well as the owner of the lookup, fact and wh_
tables, inorder to see if this is a permissions issue.
In this particular case, the problem was resolved by using oci instead of odbc,
as explained in suggestion# 1.

Poor Performance with Fairpoint DSL

I started using Verizon DSL for my internet connection and had no problems. When Fairpoint Communications purchased Verizon (this is in Vermont), they took over the DSL (about May 2009). Since then, I have had very poor performance with all applications as soon as I start a browser. The performance problems occur regardless of the browser - I've tried Firefox (3.5.4), Safari (4.0.3) and Opera (10.0). I've been around and around with Fairpoint for 6 months with no resolution. I have not changed any software or hardware on my Mac during that time, except for updating the browsers and Apple updates to the OS, iTunes, etc. The performance problems continued right through these updates. I've run tests to check my internet speed and get times of 2.76Mbps (download) and 0.58Mbps (upload) which are within the specified limits for the DSL service. My Mac is a 2GHz PowerPC G5 runnning OSX 10.4.11. It has 512MB DDR SDRAM. I use a Westell Model 6100 modem for the DSL provided by Verizon.
Some of the specific problems I see are:
1. very long waits of more than a minute after a click on an item in the menu bar
2. very long waits of more than two minutes after a click on an item on a browser page
3. frequent pinwheels in response to a click on a menu item/browser page item
4. frequent pinwheels if I just move the mouse without a click
5. frequent messages for stopped/unresponsive scripts
6. videos (like YouTube) stop frequently for no reason; after several minutes, I'll get a little audio but no new video; eventually after several more minutes it will get going again (both video and audio)
7. response in non-browser applications is also very slow
8. sometimes will get no response at all to a mouse click
9. trying to run more than one browser at a time will bring the Mac to its knees
10. browser pages frequently take several minutes to load
These are just some of the problems I have.
These problems all go away and everything runs fine as soon as I stop the browser. If I start the browser, they immediately surface again. I've trying clearing the cache, etc with no improvements.
What I would like to do is find a way to determine if the problem is in my Mac or with the Fairpoint service. Since I had no problems with Verizon and have made no changes to my Mac, I really suspect the problem lies with Fairpoint. Can anyone help me out? Thanks.

1) Another thing that you could try it is deleting the preference files for networking. Mac OS will regenerate these files. You would then need to reconfigure your network settings.
The list of files comes from Mac OS X 10.4.
http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=8185915#8185915
http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=10718694#10718694
2) I think it is time to do a clean install of your system.
3) It's either the software or an intermittent hardware problem.
If money isn't an issue, I suggest an external harddrive for re-installing Mac OS.
You need an external Firewire drive to boot a PowerPC Mac computer.
I recommend you do a google search on any external harddrive you are looking at.
I bought a low cost external drive enclosure. When I started having trouble with it, I did a google search and found a lot of complaints about the drive enclosure. I ended up buying a new drive enclosure. On my second go around, I decided to buy a drive enclosure with a good history of working with Macs. The chip set seems to be the key ingredient. The Oxford line of chips seems to be good. I got the Oxford 911.
The latest the hard drive enclosures support the newer serial ata drives. The drive and closure that I list supports only older parallel ata.
Has everything interface:
FireWire 800/400 + USB2, + eSATA 'Quad Interface'
save a little money interface:
FireWire 400 + USB 2.0
This web page lists both external harddrive types. You may need to scroll to the right to see both.
http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/firewire/1394/USB/EliteAL/eSATAFW800_FW400USB
Here is an external hd enclosure.
http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Other%20World%20Computing/MEFW91UAL1K/
Here is what one contributor recommended:
http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=10452917#10452917
Folks in these Mac forums recommend LaCie, OWC or G-Tech.
Here is a list of recommended drives:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=5564509#5564509
FireWire compared to USB. You will find that FireWire 400 is faster than USB 2.0 when used for a external harddrive connection.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UniversalSerial_Bus#USB_compared_toFireWire
http://www23.tomshardware.com/storageexternal.html

HT204266 My iPad (version 1, IOS 5.1) has quit connecting with the store. I am unable to update or buy any app. I did a reboot and a reset with deleting the data. I can not find anything in support for this problem. Any help will be appreciated.

My iPad (version 1, IOS 5.1) has quit connecting with the store. I am unable to update or buy any app. I did a reboot and a reset with deleting the data. I can not find anything in support for this problem. Any help will be appreciated.

My iPad (version 1, IOS 5.1) has quit connecting with the store. I am unable to update or buy any app. I did a reboot and a reset with deleting the data. I can not find anything in support for this problem. Any help will be appreciated.

APP-PAY-07201 Cannot perform a delete when child record exists in future

I am trying to put end date to a payment method of any employee in HR/Payroll 11.5.10.2
but receiving the following error message:
APP-PAY-07201 Cannot perform a delete when child record exists in future
Can u advise what steps I should follow to resolve this issue.
Regards /Ali

This note is related to termination of employee while our employee is on payroll and just want to change is payment method. But in the presence of existing payment method we cannot attched another becuase we are receiving an error:
APP-PAY-07041: Priority must be unique within an orgainzational payment method

Hi Friends... I'm trying to delete a back-up file on mu TC but I get the message "The operation could not be completed because the item "bands" is in use. I'd like to start the Back from scratch, could help me out with deleting the current file?

Hi Friends...
I’m trying to delete a back-up file on mu TC but I get the message “The operation could not be completed because the item “bands” is in use. I’d like to start the Back from scratch, could help me out with deleting the current file?

Sorry, I am very confused. I asked the following question....
Is this the only backup file on your Mac, or do you have other backup files and data on the Time Capsule disk?
The answer that you gave was....
This is the only one
Now you are saying that....
But I have lots of other files on Time Capsule! The back up file is only one of them.
Can you clarify, please?

Are there Issues with poor performance with Maverick OS,

Are there issues with slow and reduced performance with Mavericks OS

check this
http://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/126081/10-9-2-slows-down-processes
or
this:
https://discussions.apple.com/message/25341556#25341556
I am doing a lot of analyses with 10.9.2 on a late 2013 MBP, and these analyses generally last hours or days. I observed that Maverick is slowing them down considerably for some reasons after few hours of computations, making it impossible for me to work with this computer...

Performance with the new Mac Pros?

I sold my old Mac Pro (first generation) a few months ago in anticipation of the new line-up. In the meantime, I purchased a i7 iMac and 12GB of RAM. This machine is faster than my old Mac for most Aperture operations (except disk-intensive stuff that I only do occasionally).
I am ready to purchase a "real" Mac, but I'm hesitating because the improvements just don't seem that great. I have two questions:
1. Has anyone evaluated qualitative performance with the new ATI 5870 or 5770? Long ago, Aperture seemed pretty much GPU-constrained. I'm confused about whether that's the case anymore.
2. Has anyone evaluated any of the new Mac Pro chips for general day-to-day use? I'm interested in processing through my images as quickly as possible, so the actual latency to demosaic and render from the raw originals (Canon 1-series) is the most important metric. The second thing is having reasonable performance for multiple brushed-in effect bricks.
I'm mostly curious if anyone has any experience to point to whether it's worth it -- disregarding the other advantages like expandability and nicer (matte) displays.
Thanks.
Ben

Thanks for writing. Please don't mind if I pick apart your statements.
"For an extra $200 the 5870 is a no brainer." I agree on a pure cost basis that it's not a hard decision. But I have a very quiet environment, and I understand this card can make a lot of noise. To pay money, end up with a louder machine, and on top of that realize no significant benefit would be a minor disaster.
So, the more interesting question is: has anyone actually used the 5870 and can compare it to previous cards? A 16-bit 60 megapixel image won't require even .5GB of VRAM if fully tiled into it, for example, so I have no ability, a priori, to prove to myself that it will matter. I guess I'm really hoping for real-world data. Perhaps you speak from this experience, Matthew? (I can't tell.)
Background work and exporting are helpful, but not as critical for my primary daily use. I know the CPU is also used for demosaicing or at least some subset of the render pipeline, because I have two computers that demonstrate vastly different render-from-raw response times with the same graphics card. Indeed, it is this lag that would be the most valuable of all for me to reduce. I want to be able to flip through a large shoot and see each image at 100% as instantaneously as possible. On my 2.8 i7 that process takes about 1 second on average (when Aperture doesn't get confused and mysteriously stop rendering 100% images).
Ben

Performance with Boot Camp/Gaming?

Hi,
I just acquired a MBP/2GHz IntelCD/2GB RAM/100GB/Superdrive, with Applecare. Can anyone comment about the performance with
Boot Camp -- running Windows XP SP2, and what the gaming graphics are like?
Appreciate it, thanks...
J.
Powerbook G4 [15" Titanium - DVI] Mac OS X (10.4.8) 667MHz; 1GB RAM; 80GB

Well, I didn't forget to mention what I did not know yet.... So that's not exactly correct..
As per Apple's support page, http://support.apple.com/specs/macbookpro/MacBook_Pro.html
My new computer does have 256MB of video memory...

Performance with external display

Hello,
when I'm connecting my 19'' TFT to the MacBook the performance (with the same applications runnig) is realy bad. It tooks longer to switch between apps and if I don't use an app for some time, it can took up to 30 sec to "reactivate" the app.
Because the HD is working when I switch apps, it looks like the OS is swapping. My question: Would it help to upgrade the MacBook to 2GB ram? AFAIC the intel card uses shared memory.
Thanks for your help
Till
MacBook 1.83 GHz/1GB Mac OS X (10.4.8)

How much RAM do you have? Remember that the MB does not have dedicated VRAM like some computers do and that it uses the system RAM to drive the graphics chipset.
I use my MB with the mini-DVI to DVI adapter to drive a 20" widescreen monitor without any of the problems that you describe, but I have 2GB of RAM. If you only have the stock 512MB of RAM, that may be part of what you are seeing.

Performance with LinkedList in java

Hello All,
Please suggest me any solution to further improve the performance with List.
The problem description is as follows:
I have a huge number of objects, lets say 10,000 , and need to store the objects in such a collection so that if i want to store an object at some particular index i , I get the best performance.
I suppose as I need indexed based access, using List makes the best sense as Lists are ordered.
Using LinkedList over ArrayList gives the better performance in the aforementioned context.
Is there are way I can further improve the performance of LinkedList while solving this particular problem
OR
Is there any other index based collection using that i get better performance than LinkedList?
Thanks in advance

The trouble with a LinkedList as implemented in the Java libraries is that if you want to insert at index 100, it has no option but to step through the first 100 links of the list to find the insert point. Likewise is you retrieve by index. The strength of the linked list approach is lost if you work by index and the List interface gives no other way to insert in the middle of the list. The natural interface for a linked list would include an extended Iterator with methods for insert and replace. Of course LinkedLists are fine when you insert first or last.
My guess would be that if your habitual insertion point was half way or more through the list then ArrayList would serve you better especially if you leave ample room for growth. Moving array elements up is probably not much more expensive, per element, than walking the linked list. Maybe 150% or thereabouts.
Much depends on how you retrieve, and how volatile the list is. Certainly if you are a read-mostly situation and cannot use an iterator then a LinkedList won't suit.

Performance with delete

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for