Performing searches across different Human Tasks

On our project we have been using Custom Views within BPM Workspace to perform searches on running and closed workflow instances.
We have found that we first have to choose what Human Task we want to build the custom search on (e.g.. "Vacation request Manager´s review") and then build the view.
However, we do not know how to perform searches across different tasks (e.g.: list all vacation requests either "under Manager´s review" or "pending HR acceptance") and get the results in a single page.
How can we do this?
Regards
Juan Algaba Colera

Hi,
This link may help you : http://beatechnologies.wordpress.com/2011/06/29/using-flex-fields-in-oracle-bpm-11g/

Similar Messages

Human Task allocation in 11g

Hi,
The Human task defined in BPEL process through the jdev in 10g had an option to edit the task definition, wherein one could change the allocation of task. But this option is not to be seen in 11g jdev editor. The task definition seems to be read only with an option to edit the task rather then change the task allocation. Is there a way to achieve this in 11g ?
Thanks.

Hi,
Thank for the prompt reply, this seems to be a tedious job, all the more painful in case if you have an application been migrated from 10g to 11g. We have this application which has 12 different groups to be assigned across numerous human task. When this application was migrated from 10g to 11g through the jdev, all the human task by default got allocated to one group. In the absence of reassignments, deleting these human task and recreating with new assignments is final option, but considering the numerous human task this would be a really agonizing task. Is there any other alternate option available.

Limitations on Using Human Task advance routing rules and stages

In one of our requirement we have used human task with different number of stages (14 stages ) and for all this we are using only one human task component and to route the task through different stages I am using advance routing rules (30 rules),we have exposed this through bpel .My code is working fine .
My question is:-
1- Do this kind of design contain flaws, is there is any restriction on using of number of stages and number of routing rules. Is there is any best practise which suggests that we cannot have more than certain number of stages or routing rules..??
2-Is it feasible to use different human task component for each of the human task stages and route the data using business rule, but that will be very exhausted and unnecessarily making bpel heavier, also the front end people will be having more number of bpm urls which will make their work tedious.
Please suggest .
Thank you

This doesn't sound good. That's an EJB internal to BPEL if I'm not mistaken. Did the install go ok? Has this ever worked before?
I'd check the logs on startup for any sign of an exception. This may be the symptom of a problem which will be logged on startup.
Also, search metalink and open an SR -- this EJB isn't something you need to configure in a normal install -- at least not that I'm familiar with.

Configuring webmail to search across folders

I was wondering how you can get webmail to search across different folders as to perform local searches (limited to current folder) or global searches coming across all folders ... i suspect there is an option to set this up properly but the current documentation is a bit confusing and partial ,
Thanking you for your time and attention and waiting to read from you soon ,
Best Regards,

Hi Mapper99,
If you mean the following search:
You may click on the search icon on the top of the message list, then it will show out like the picture above, you could choose to search in the current folder, or you may choose All folders as listed.
It is almost the same settings in Windows 8.1, you may follow this guide for the other options:
Mail app for Windows
Best regards
Michael Shao
TechNet Community Support

Reusing Human Tasks across BPM Processes with different Data Objects

Hi
JDeveloper 11.1.1.6, WLS 10.3.6, SOA/BPM 11.1.1.6
I have defined 2 BPM Processes, P1 and P2, which has 2 different Process Data Objects O1 and O2.
But I am reusing the same Human Task in both the processes.
For the Human Task to support the activities in both the processes, I have added O1 and O2 Data Objects in the Human Task Definition.
And hence the ADF Taskflow / page generated out of the Human Task will have both the Data Objects O1 and O2 as payload objects in the Page.
When an instance of Process P1 is created, the payload O1 will have values, but O2 will be null.
And when an instance of Process P2 is created, the payload O2 will have values, but O1 will be null.
It works well like this, but I am a bit concerned about the performance from BPM Process and also ADF page.
In ADF page, let us say, somehow I can control the rendering of the attributes or creation of the iterator bindings based on identifying which process is being executed.
(By setting the iterator binding refresh property in page definition)
In this way attribute bindings for O1 will not be created when P2 is being executed.
But still when the Process instance is created, and when we see the payload structure of the human task in the EM - Audit Trail,
I still see both data objects O1 and O2 are created in the Payload, but O1 will have nulls in process P2.
So my question is, from performance point of view, is it advisable to define different Data Objects in reusable Human tasks ?
Or should I have to define a separate Human Task definition which contains only the Data Objects related to the process it is being called from ?
Thanks for any help
Sameer

Martijn,
You are correct in your assessment that the JAG in the current JHeadstart release cannot cope with multiple bc4j packages. There is no work around for this. Upgrading to 9051 will not help.
In the JHeadstart-ADF release, this restriction has been lifted. You can place your EO, VO and AM objects in different packages, and you can group them in a separate project (Model project), while generating your JHeadstart application in a ViewController project.
We have a number of customers that use the latest JHeadstart-ADF builds to build their ADF apps. If you are interested in joining this beta program, please send an e-mail to [email protected]
Steven Davelaar,
JHeadstart Team.

Insert, search, delete performance overhead for different collections

Hi,
I am trying to create a table which compares performance overheads for different collections data structures. Does anyone want to help me out? I want to put a number from 1 - 9 in each of the question marks. 1 being very poor performance and 9 being very good performance (the reason I am doing this is that I had this question in a job interview test and I didn't pass it)
anyone have any comments?
Searching Inserting Deleting
ArrayList ? ? ?
LinkedList ? ? ?
TreeSet ? ? ?
TreeMap ? ? ?
HashMap ? ? ?
HashSet ? ? ?
Stack ? ? ?

sorry the formatting has screwed up a bit when I posted it. It should have a list of the collection types and three columns (inserting, deleting, searching)

Searching for multiple images across different volumes?

Hi, is there a way or an app that can search for different images across various volumes? I need to locate 200 images for an InDesign file across 3 server volumes.
Thanks,
Bill

In the Finder, press command-F to open a search window, or select
File ▹ Find
from the menu bar. In the search window, select
Search: This Mac
from the row of tokens below the toolbar.

Create reusable BPM Human Task Form across Projects

Hi,
I have a challange in my project. I have a BPM application with many BPM process inside, and each BPM process has its own human tasks. Is easy for each HT create a form in a jspx file, for that an independent project is created.
The challange is: most of the HT payload is just informative, and it is wanted to be shown in most of the HT across the application so, what do you suggest me to do, in order to avoid reorganize a form every time I create it with "Autogenerate Form" or "Launch Create Form Wizard" options in the HT?. With reorganize a form I mean: put this label here, change this to read-only, change the layout, etc...
Thank you!
AAPDL

Hi,
its best to post this question to the SOA forum. The answer on this forum would be to use a page template, a parametrized bounded task flow and then add the bounded task flow to each page that has the template. However, the task flow in the HT case is generated, which means that you re-build it all the time (meaning you don't work with the same task flow but multiple). If you know how to just use the HT API to access the information to display, you could write a generic bounded task flow for this. Check on the SOA forum if they can come up with a template approach for your use case.
Frank

The best way of carrying the search string across different jsp pages?

I heard about transfer object. What about carrying object with session for different pages.
Please suggest me the best approach to
carry the search string across different jsp pages?
thanks
vijendra

I doubt its possible even with a fancy HTML widget, although the last iBA update now allows links to other books.

"Reassign" and "Adhoc Route" Actions in human tasks

Has anyone run into oddities when using either the "Reassign" or "Adhoc Route" actions from within a task in the BPM workspace?
When I try to re-assign to a different participant, it seems the assignment gets lost altogether. The task history section on the task form shows the particpant went from the user I was logged in as and performed the reassign action to a "blank" participant on the next row. The Action column next to the blank participant shows "System Update" and the updated by column shows the participant from the previous row.
When I attempt to Adhoc Route, I select the participant to send to (via the search and moving them from the LHS to RHS of the shuttle widget) and add my comment - but when I click OK it doesn't go anywhere. The screen updates and the task history shows a new row indicating a comment was added, but not the adhoc routing assignment. It just stays in the current assignment as if nothing changed except the comment.

It also seems that the "Edit Routing Slip" option isn't functioning properly. If you go into a human task and click the "edit" pencil next to the "Task will go from starting to final participant" and check "Allow participants to edit new participants" then when you view the task within workspace the routing slip within the "History" section will appear with buttons to add/remove/edit rows in addition to an "Apply" and "Reset" button. However the add/remove/edit icons are always disabled. I tried with a participant within the routing slip, the Process Owner as well as an administrative user, but the results were the same. Am I doing this incorrectly?
Are these bugs or have these features not yet been implemented?

Unable to deploy BPM projects with human tasks from BPC

I’m trying to edit and deploy a BPM process from Business Process Composer (web based tool). To do it, I followed the steps below:
1.     I created I project in JDeveloper
2.     I created the Human task from using the “Auto-generate task form” option
3.     I converted it to a template
4.     I published it to BPM MDS
5.     On Business Process Composer I created I new project based on my published template
6.     And I finally I deployed it with no errors.
When I ran the BPM it creates I human task but I’m not able to access its form on Business Process Workspace.
On Business Process Workspace I can see the task created by my BPM process, but when I click on it to access its form I get a 404 message (message below).
Error 404--Not Found
From RFC 2068 Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1:
10.4.5 404 Not Found
The server has not found anything matching the Request-URI. No indication is given of whether the condition is temporary or permanent.
If the server does not wish to make this information available to the client, the status code 403 (Forbidden) can be used instead. The 410 (Gone) status code SHOULD be used if the server knows, through some internally configurable mechanism, that an old resource is permanently unavailable and has no forwarding address.
I think this error occur because my Task form project was not deployed. To fix it I undeployed all the applications and then I deployed the BPM application with all its tasks forms from JDeveloper. It worked fine (I can actually access the task form on Business Process Workspace), but now I’m not able to edit the BPM process on Business Process Composer anymore.
Then I finally repeated the steps 3 to 6 on top of this post in order to make the BMP process editable on Business Process Workspace but this time I receive the error at the end of this post taken from server log.
No matters if I publish the project on MDS BMP repository as a template project or as non template project. I always have the same problem.
So, how can I use a BPM project that contains Human Tasks forms on Business Process Composer?
I’m using:
•     JDevelopper: 11.1.1.5
•     Oracle Soa Suite 11.1.1.5
Error:
<Error> <ServletContext-/soa-infra> <AUSDCCMTPRF03> <soa_server1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '10' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <weblogic> <> <daba687c30fc2ae1:5f5821e2:131915bbc92:-8000-000000000001c442> <1312478914395> <BEA-000000> <Error during deployment
oracle.fabric.common.FabricException: Deployment Failed: Error occurred during deployment of component: AssignVendorETATask to service engine: implementation.workflow, for composite: AlertBPMProject: ORABPEL-30123
Error while deploying task metadata.
The task namespace http://xmlns.oracle.com/AlertBPMApplication/AlertBPMProject/AssignVendorETATask is already used as a template namespace.
Check if the project you are deploying now is a template project. Please avoid deploying template projects. Use a different namespace for the task definition to fix the problem or set the suffixNamespace flag to true.
: Error while deploying task metadata.
The task namespace http://xmlns.oracle.com/AlertBPMApplication/AlertBPMProject/AssignVendorETATask is already used as a template namespace.
Check if the project you are deploying now is a template project. Please avoid deploying template projects. Use a different namespace for the task definition to fix the problem or set the suffixNamespace flag to true.
     at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.deploy.StandaloneCompositeDeploymentCoordinatorImpl.coordinateCompositeDeployment(StandaloneCompositeDeploymentCoordinatorImpl.java:62)
     at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.deploy.servlet.BaseDeployProcessor.deployNewComposite(BaseDeployProcessor.java:378)
     at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.deploy.servlet.BaseDeployProcessor.deploySARs(BaseDeployProcessor.java:226)
Caused By: oracle.fabric.common.FabricException: Error occurred during deployment of component: AssignVendorETATask to service engine: implementation.workflow, for composite: AlertBPMProject: ORABPEL-30123
Error while deploying task metadata.
The task namespace http://xmlns.oracle.com/AlertBPMApplication/AlertBPMProject/AssignVendorETATask is already used as a template namespace.
Check if the project you are deploying now is a template project. Please avoid deploying template projects. Use a different namespace for the task definition to fix the problem or set the suffixNamespace flag to true.
: Error while deploying task metadata.
The task namespace http://xmlns.oracle.com/AlertBPMApplication/AlertBPMProject/AssignVendorETATask is already used as a template namespace.
Check if the project you are deploying now is a template project. Please avoid deploying template projects. Use a different namespace for the task definition to fix the problem or set the suffixNamespace flag to true.
     at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.deploy.CompositeDeploymentConnection.deployComponents(CompositeDeploymentConnection.java:244)
     at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.deploy.CompositeDeploymentConnection.deploy(CompositeDeploymentConnection.java:93)
Caused By: oracle.fabric.common.FabricDeploymentException: ORABPEL-30123
Error while deploying task metadata.
The task namespace http://xmlns.oracle.com/AlertBPMApplication/AlertBPMProject/AssignVendorETATask is already used as a template namespace.
Check if the project you are deploying now is a template project. Please avoid deploying template projects. Use a different namespace for the task definition to fix the problem or set the suffixNamespace flag to true.
: Error while deploying task metadata.
The task namespace http://xmlns.oracle.com/AlertBPMApplication/AlertBPMProject/AssignVendorETATask is already used as a template namespace.
Check if the project you are deploying now is a template project. Please avoid deploying template projects. Use a different namespace for the task definition to fix the problem or set the suffixNamespace flag to true.
{rootCauses=[]}
     at oracle.bpel.services.workflow.fabric.WorkflowServiceEngine.deploy(WorkflowServiceEngine.java:908)
     at oracle.bpel.services.workflow.fabric.WorkflowServiceEngine.deploy(WorkflowServiceEngine.java:368)
     at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.deploy.CompositeDeploymentConnection.deployComponents(CompositeDeploymentConnection.java:239)
     at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:209)
     at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:178)
Caused By: ORABPEL-30123
Error while deploying task metadata.
The task namespace http://xmlns.oracle.com/AlertBPMApplication/AlertBPMProject/AssignVendorETATask is already used as a template namespace.
Check if the project you are deploying now is a template project. Please avoid deploying template projects. Use a different namespace for the task definition to fix the problem or set the suffixNamespace flag to true.

I came across the same issue, and now resolved it like this.
Firstly, you shouldn't deploy QuoteProcessLab with other UILabs like ApproveDealUILab and so on. So, if you already did it, then go to Weblogic EM and undeploy it.
Secondly, you should deploy each of UILab separately as standalone application. So, deploy EnterQuiteUILab, BUsinessPracticesUILab, and so on each. These will run independently behind and when your project created based on template in the Composer runs, it will link each of these on human task.
Thirdly, publish you QuoteProcessLab. And follow the book about how to create a project based on template in the Composer.
Just one thing you should be careful with is, when you do auto-generation for human task, it sometimes doesn't work fully, unfinished halfway through. So, make sure that the icon 'go to existing business form taskflow' in .task file takes you to the human taskflow.
If it fails, do another auto-generation. Sometimes DataBindings.cpx can get corrupted by JDev, but let's not go too far for now.
Mostly, it will work.
Sung

Human tasks, complex types and variable assignment.

Hi folks,
I encountered a problem while working with 10.1.3.1 which I haven't managed to solve yet and would be grateful for assistance. I have defined a complex data type (just a sequence of strings) and want to fill that data type by going through a flow of screens, e.g. through several human tasks. I have defined that type as a variable to the BPEL process and have managed to assign simple expressions to the variable and pass that into a Human Task. In the task I see now a simple input form for all attributes of the type.
Now the problem. After I fill out the form and complete the human task, I have
The global variable:
<outputVariable>
     <part xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" name="payload">
          <MyProcessResponse xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/VacationRequest">
               <vorname/>
               <nachname/>
               <strasse/>
               <nummer/>
               <postleitzahl/>
               <stadt/>
               <maximaleDauer/>
               <minimaleDauer/>
          </MyProcessResponse>
     </part>
</outputVariable>
and the return value from the human task:
<task>
     <title>CaptureData</title>-
          <payload>
               <MyProcessResponse>
                    <vorname>David</vorname>
                    <nachname>Beckham</nachname>
                    <strasse>HighStreet</strasse>
                    <nummer/>
                    <postleitzahl/>
                    <stadt/>
                    <maximaleDauer/>
                    <minimaleDauer/>
               </MyProcessResponse>
          </payload>
</task>
Now the only thing I would like to do is to replace the original values in the variable with the new values that have been returned from the task, this should be performed in an extra assign step. Sounds simple. JDeveloper wouldn't even let me klick through the return value from the HumanTask, so it seems as if I have to do things manually.
These are my tries:
Command 1:
<copy>
     <from variable="CaptureData_1_globalVariable"
part="payload" query="/task:task/task:payload" />
<to variable="outputVariable" part="payload"
query="/ns1:MyProcessResponse"/>
</copy>
Result 1:
<outputVariable>
     <part xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" name="payload">
          <ns0:MyProcessResponse xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/bpel/workflow/task"     xmlns:ns0="http://xmlns.oracle.com/VacationRequest">
               <MyProcessResponse xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/VacationRequest">
                    <vorname>David</vorname>
                    <nachname>Beckham</nachname>
                    <strasse>HighStreet</strasse>
                    <nummer/>
                    <postleitzahl/>
                    <stadt/>
                    <maximaleDauer/>
                    <minimaleDauer/>
               </MyProcessResponse>
          </ns0:MyProcessResponse>
     </part>
</outputVariable>
--> There is one MyProcessResponse element too many
Command 2:
<copy>
     <from variable="CaptureData_1_globalVariable"
part="payload" query="/task:task/task:payload"/>
<to variable="outputVariable" part="payload"
query="/ns1:MyProcessResponse/ns1:vorname"/>
</copy>
Result 2:
<outputVariable>
     <part xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" name="payload">
          <MyProcessResponse xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/VacationRequest">
               <ns0:vorname xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/bpel/workflow/task"                     xmlns:ns0="http://xmlns.oracle.com/VacationRequest">
                    <MyProcessResponse xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/VacationRequest">
                         <vorname>David</vorname>
                         <nachname>Beckham</nachname>
                         <strasse>HighStreet</strasse>
                         <nummer/>
                         <postleitzahl/>
                         <stadt/>
                         <maximaleDauer/>
                         <minimaleDauer/>
                    </MyProcessResponse>
               </ns0:vorname>
               <nachname/>
               <strasse/>
               <nummer/>
               <postleitzahl/>
               <stadt/>
               <maximaleDauer/>
               <minimaleDauer/>
          </MyProcessResponse>
     </part>
</outputVariable>
--> This was moreless expected, since I tried to copy the stuff to some wrong place.
Command 3:
<copy>
     <from variable="CaptureData_1_globalVariable"
part="payload" query="/task:task/task:payload/ns0:MyProcessResponse"/>
<to variable="outputVariable" part="payload"
query="/ns1:MyProcessResponse"/>
</copy>
Result 3:
--> Task does't return (!!!). In the BPEL Worklist, the task is completed, however in the BPEL console it still apears as "waiting to return from Human task".
Does anyone have a hint on how to copy the values so that I get exactly the structure that I printed at the very top?
Thanks for help. Rock On !

Hello everyone,
It seems that we are talking about different things, I am afraid. Let me describe the scenario once again:
- I want to have a BPEL process with more than one role involved
- This process should be used to gather some complex data.
- All data gathering should be done through HumanTasks.
So I defined an xsd complex type, that contains a sequence of fields. This complex type should be part of the process payload.
Now before HumanTask 1 is called, I copy the contents of this variable into the input for tasks1. This works fine and I see the appropriate values, when opening the Human Task in the BPEL worklist application.
Now after HumanTask1 is completed, the values I entered inside that tasks are returned as a variable from the HumanTask. My problem is, that I cannot copy the contents of the task back into the main process. With simpleTypes this is relatively ok, since Jdev supports the assembling of the copy operation, however for complex tasks it fails.
A typical scenario for this would be where e.g. a customer fills a shipping address and afterwards a store staff fills product details in the same order. In Java this could be solved via "pass by reference". Who can provide an example?

What is best implementation for two human tasks?

I am trying to find the best way to do this,
I have two human task workflows that I have created. The application we are making uses one of these workflows based on a parameter you give it through a text box. So lets say you have workflow A and B. If you select A it will run and do workflow A and vice versa. These workflow also have different inputs associated with them for review.
My question is what is the best way to implement this?
My first thought is to create two separate projects, one that does workflow A and the other does workflow B and deploy both composites to the server, and have two separate form projects in the Application deployment.
There is also another way I was thinking about doing this which is to have a mediator that takes in input and either goes from one bpel process or another bpel process, my problem with this is I don't know how to make certain fields in the webservice payload not mandatory. So any advice on this would be helpful.
Is there any difference in the performance of these two ways? Which way is better?

I am trying to find the best way to do this,
I have two human task workflows that I have created. The application we are making uses one of these workflows based on a parameter you give it through a text box. So lets say you have workflow A and B. If you select A it will run and do workflow A and vice versa. These workflow also have different inputs associated with them for review.
My question is what is the best way to implement this?
My first thought is to create two separate projects, one that does workflow A and the other does workflow B and deploy both composites to the server, and have two separate form projects in the Application deployment.
There is also another way I was thinking about doing this which is to have a mediator that takes in input and either goes from one bpel process or another bpel process, my problem with this is I don't know how to make certain fields in the webservice payload not mandatory. So any advice on this would be helpful.
Is there any difference in the performance of these two ways? Which way is better?

Dynamic participant block in Human task flow

Hi All,
I am working on human task flow and got stopped on below use case.
I have two participant block let say A and B. I want to assign participant A depends on flat inside task flow parameter. If Flag is Yes, then it should assign to A and on approval of A it should complete the task flow. But if Flag is NO, then it should first assign to B, on approval from B, it should again assign to A and after that it should complete the task flow.
I tried to use dynamic role assignment but there i am not able to define above use case. Dynamic rule is saying you can assign A or B depends on some rule(task flow parameter) but my requirement is little different.
If Flag is Yes,
- assign to A -> on approval -> complete the task flow.
If Flag is No
- Assign to B -> on approval from B -> assign to A -> on approval from A -> complete the task flow.
I want to build this logic inside single human task flow.
Please help.
-Sunil

Hi Zaloa,
Can you pls try this.This should work.
1. Go to Edit Task Definition page and add a Parameter of type string(default).
2. Now come to the human task dialog( the one you get on double clicking the human task activity) and add a value to the parametr you just added(string)using the search light .This value should be the variable containing the value of the asssigne which you want to add dynamically.
3.Now again go to the Edit Task Definition page and select the Assignment policy and select the expression path builder.
4. You should be able to see the parameter you just added under task:payload. select this . now your assigne is dynamically added.
Pls let me know if you need further details. Hope this helps.
Thnks
Message was edited by:
soaUser

Why has a Human Task only 1 UI?

A little more abstract / philosophical discussion.
I'm not really comfortable with the rigid "1 Human Task (HT) corresponds to 1 screen (UI)", although it will be all right for 90% of the time. Could be that the BPMN spec itself is to blame for this.
Some cases:
>1 Humans are coorperating on 1 Task.
1 Human has a UI open (on the computer screen) displaying multiple Tasks.
1 Human has UI open displaying multiple Process instances for which he is responsible and drills down to a Human Task in an instance that is being performed by one of his colleagues. He opens the same task in read-only mode.
1 Human is performer of Tasks in sequence ("Road Map" or Wizard control) and doesn't want to go back to the UWL all the time. He must be able to go back to a previous step (~task) though.
1 Human breaks off his current Task (saves his work so far), and continues working on the Task later on on his mobile device.
1 Human has a generic UI screen (portal) open, and a Process token just moved into a Human Task for that Human. He doesn't have to go back to the UWL, search for that task and open it, but sees a nice UI-overlay-effect of that Task (just the title, or instance), just as Outlook displays incoming messages.
1 Human who "owns" a Process instance, checks the state of the instance, notices that a subprocess within is in error (or takes too long), overrides that subprocess by doing work manually (rolling back the already completed activities within the subprocess), and providing the subprocess output.
What are your thoughts? Are these cases too far-fetched?

You now have 2 site. Your own and the one by your son.
Since your son published last, iWeb created an index.html file in the root of the server (iDisk>Web>Sites) to redirect to his site.
That file first redirected to your site, now it redirects to his.
To make it redirect to your site again, simply move one of your pages to the top of the list and back. iWeb now thinks your default page has changed and will create a new index.html file when you publish.
Make sure your son does not update his Site.
Other solution. Buy the Family pack and give each member of the family his/her own MMe account. They have to manage that acount from their own useraccount on a Mac. Otherwise everybody interferes with each other.

Performing searches across different Human Tasks

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for