Personnel Subarea groupings for a multiple country system

We have more than 70 countries in our SAP system and more coming to be rolled out. We mainly use the HR funtionality for time recording. So, for the configuration of personnel subarea groupings in Time Recording we used the country grouping: e.g. Singapore Molga = 25, MOABW = 25, MOVER = 25, etc. For the 'SAP-countries (countries for which SAP has a template) we use MOLGA as personnel subarea grouping, for the NON-SAP countries (countries for which SAP has no template) we use a 2 digit number downwards from 98. Now we are running out of 'numbers'.
Has anybody similar problems and can you please share with me possible solutions?
Thank you very much and looking forward to your replies,
Doris

Dear Doris,
Several other possibilities exist for the grouping (not only PSG),
for example :
A) the "Employee subgroup grouping for time quotas" (ESG)
which is a char1 field (so you can use many more then the ones you
use at the moment)
B) field "Quota type selection group" (Quomo), from the documentation
of this field in V_T559L:
"Quota type selection rule group
You can use the quota type selection rule group to control absence
quota type selection based on the employee's organizational assignment.
Using different quota type selection rule groups, you can set specific
rules for quota generation.
Use
Quota generation is carried out in the schema using function QUOTA.
There are three ways of setting the quota type selection rule group:
1. Using function MOD in the time evaluation schema
Function MOD calls a personnel calculation rule that has been modified
to suit the respective schema (for example, XMOD, MODT, or TMOD). The
employee subgroup grouping for personnel calculation rules is queried
in the rule using operation PAYTP. Using operation MODIF Q=xx,
you can determine (for ach grouping) which quota type selection rule
group shoulde be used in time evaluation to access the entries
for the relevant employees in the Leave Accrual table.
2. Using a personnel calculation rule you have written yourself in the
time evaluation schema
In this case, you also set the quota type selection rule group using
operation MODIF Q=xx.
3. Using feature QUOMO
You can use the feature to set the quota type selection rule group based
on other organizational assignments. It is queried by the system during
time evaluation."
As your main issue seems to be the use of several different quota
requirements, you can define, via the use of field QUOMO in V_T559L,
for quota type 10 (just as an example) several different generation
rules (one for each Quomo).
Please note that quota 10 does not need to be always generated in the
same way, it can have a different generation rule for each key
combination of V_T559L.
The most flexible way to select which quomo should be used is via the
feature QUOMO. There you will have the following decision fields
BUKRS  Company Code
WERKS  Personnel Area
BTRTL  Personnel Subarea
PERSG  Employee Group
PERSK  Employee Subgroup
MOLGA  Country Grouping
MOURA  Personnel Subarea Grouping for Leave Types
TRFAR  Pay scale type
TRFGB  Pay Scale Area
TRFGR  Pay Scale Group
TRFST  Pay Scale Level
SCHKZ  Work Schedule Rule
PERNR  Personnel Number
ANSVH  Work Contract
CTTYP  Contract type
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Shree

Similar Messages

  • Error Personnel subarea grouping (MOABW) is not maintained.

    Hi
    Error message reflecting Personnel subarea grouping (MOABW) is not maintained while approving leave through MSS tab.
    Need help.
    Rgds
    RKG

    Hi;
    Can you check table V_001P_ALL
    You have to check personnel subarea grouping for absence and attendance types in the table
    Regards;
    Okan
    Edited by: Okan Caliskan on Sep 13, 2011 5:45 PM

  • Multiple Logical Systems in Partner Profile for one instance

    Can we create multiple Logical Systems in Partner Profile (WE20) for one instance or one System?  If it is possible, can we create Logical System with respect to Plant/Country?

    I am not quite sure if I understood your problem completley. But let's see...
    Usually you use on on MSCS Cluster Group per SAP instance. So you have your already existing NW 7.0 ABAP stack in a separated Cluster Group, and you create a new Cluster Group for your new Java system.
    You can find more information about it in this guide here on SDN:
    Link: [High Availability;
    More information about High Availability Setups for SAP System can be found here on SDN:
    Link: [High Availability]
    If you want to use the same database for your clustered ABAP stack and your new Java stack you can do a MCOD installation.
    Please see Link: [SAP Note 388866 - Multiple Components on One Database - Installation|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/388866]
    Hope this helps.
    Best regards,
    Mathias

  • Group Personnel Subarea for Work Schedule

    Hi All,
    I am learning SAP HCM ECC 6.0 at the moment, I have created Personnel Area, Personnel Subarea however when I am trying to u201CGroup Personnel Subarea for Work Scheduleu201D the newly created Personnel Areas and Personnel Subarea are not appearing the list to group them for work schedule.
    No such problem persist while Defining employee subgroup under work schedule rules and work schedule in IMG.
    Experts could you please suggest me the solution to this problem? Is there any integration missing?
    Thanks,
    Jitend

    Thanks a lot Prateek, Sujit and Ravee
    The problem is been resolved by editing in Table "V_T500P" (Country grouping), now newly created PAs and PSAs are appearing in the list and I can "Group personnel subarea for work schedule"
    I did the the basic configuration of PAs, PSAs, EG, ESG and I assigned them to company code however PAs and PSAs were not appearing in the list to group them for Work Schedule. The problem is been resolved now by editing in Table.
    I really appreciate your help here.
    Edited by: Jitendk on May 31, 2011 12:11 PM

  • Updation Error in "Group Personnel Subareas for the Work Schedule "

    Hello everyone,
    While trying to assign a PS grouping  code to my Personnel Area here, I am facing a problem.
    I can't see them in the table mentioned above .
    Already checked the previous steps in Enterprise structure i.e creation PA and PSA, they are displayed properly in respective tables but I can't find them here in grouping for work schedule.
    Could any one of you be kind enough to throw some light on possible errors and their solutions.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Vibhu

    Hi,
    Just now I am able to sort out this problem, Actually we need to carry out "Maintain User Parameter" activity under 'Personnel Administration'
    IMG Steps are as follows :
    SPRO => Personnel Management => Personnel Administration => Basic Settings => Maintain User Parameters
    Following screen will come up
    here select the country you like to work on (in my case it is India)
    Select Continue
    A pop up will come stating "Parameters created for India"
    Select Continue
    User profile screen will come up
    Save it
    Now go to time management section of IMG
    Go to "Personnel subarea grouping"
    Personnel areas belonging to your country grouping will be displayed on screen.
    Thanks,
    Vibhu

  • Find exact RFC Destination for Multiple backend Systems In SAP Gateway

    Hi Gateway developers,
    I have requirement,if gateway hub system has multiple backend systems( for example two backend systems: ECC and SRM ) then  how  hub system can get the suitable backend alias for exact entity collection..
    Here i have developed two entities one entity regards: ECC and second one regards SRM system..within this when I run the service it is always taking any of the same alias for both the collections..
    Can you please suggest me..
    Thanks
    Sreenivas Pachva

    Hi Srinivas,
    You can add the respective system Alias Name: Like logical system name in your URI also.
    Example:
    /sap/Service Name;mo=ECCCLNT210/zentity1?Customer1='0001'
    /sap/Service Name;mo=SRMCLNT400/zentity2?Customer2='ABCD'
    May this help you.
    Thanks,
    Saurabh Gupta

  • Unable to define connector for multiple backend systems in BRM

    Hi,
    I am on GRCFND_A V.11 and SP04
    I have multiple backend systems integrated with GRC box. So far I was using one backend connector as default one for role maintenance but it is not feasible if you have to create roles in variuos backend connected systems. I know one way to do so, i can keep changing the default connectors whenever i need to create roles but that is obviously not at all the onw any one would like to go with.
    So, I tried to create unique connector groups for every individul backend connectors. But the issue is, the moment i assign the backend connector to the respective connector groups, the same gets reflected to other connector groups as well. So, whenever i either add or delete some of the connectors to any connector groups it gets modified/changed from all of the connector groups.
    These are the backend connectors where i have to create roles from BRM whenever needed.
    These are the connector groups:
    I followed to the ink: GRC AC 10 BRM: Default Connectors with Multiple Back-end R/3 Systems , which is the same as mine issue, but not able to come to the solution point.
    would appreciate for your quick response.
    Thanks,
    Ameet

    Could anyone suggest solution to the above mentioned issue please?

  • Multiple Business Systems for Multiple Receivers?

    hi,
    idoc > xi -> multiple receivers with xml payload
    I have a scenario where i have to configure multiple receivers for each Supplier from an IDOC. All the receivers will be either HTTP or SOAP.
    When the mapping would be the same for all the Suppliers but during configuration we have to determine the receiver based on an IDOC value to route the xml via HTTP or SOAP
    For this to achieve do we have to create multiple business systems for each receiver?
    If i create a receiver in the business service how can we determine the interface mapping in this scenario?
    Thanks,
    Tirumal

    Hi Tirumal,
    <i>For this to achieve do we have to create multiple business systems for each receiver?</i>
    As you know,Business system is a logical name for the Techincal Systems, Theoretcially it is not required to create different Business systems for the each receivers.
    Generally Business Systems are grouped/created based on the Business Process/Functionality/Type of Receivers etc.
    So if you think, your each receiver is of type different type/process then create different Business systems.
    It depends~
    If you create Business Service, then you need to add your Message Interfaces explicitly into the Business Service( By open the Business Service->You can see the Sender/Receiver Interface tabs).
    Hope this helps,
    regards,
    moorthy

  • Multiple HANA systems connection for Smart Business Fiori Apps

    Hi Experts,
    I could configure and run standard Fiori apps through launchpad and able to configure all type of Fiori apps through web dispature and single HANA system1 [retail]
    As per the recommendation from SAP, we have separate HANA system2 for finance.
    Now here is the tricky part.
    I have added HANA system2 in web dispature. Also I have the trusted connection in my front end gateway server for transactional apps.
    Transactional apps from HANA system2 db is working fine. Now, I would like to configure Finance related Analytical apps from HANA system2 views. For this I am not able to get KPI IDs for evaluation and drill-down configuration.
    The path for Smart Business KPI modeler in both the HANA systems are same. Is this causing issue to bring KPI IDs and HANA views into modeler?
    How to get both views in single KPI modeler tool to configure the KPI tiles?
    Please let me know how to proceed?
    Thanks!
    Praveen.

    Johannes
    There is some problem with the link
    See this.
    Connecting multiple SAP Systems
    Thread name is 'Connecting multiple SAP Systems'
    Krishna Murthy

  • Incorrect combinations for personnel area and personnel subare

    Hi all,
    we are getting incorrect combinations for personnel area and personnel subarea in the Target and as well in report.
    we are using standard datasources 0PERS_AREA_TEXT and 0PERS_SAREA_TEXT, we are extracting only masterdata text from ECC, Not maintaining Attibute and Hierarchy for personnel area and personnel subarea.
    we created (Actions overview) report on top of standard DSO 0PA_DS12 extracted from data source 0HR_PA_1,
    Actually some of employees are changed on xxxx.xx.xx date from one personnel area to another personnel area with respective subarea's, but here employee personnel area are coming correctly but not for subarea.
    what i need to do now?
    can any one help out in this..
    Thanks in advance.
    Thanks,
    Sri

    Hi,
    In this context we will have two senarios.
    1. Displaying the Personal Area and Personal Sub Area from Transactional data.
    2. Displaying from Master Data.
    If you choose Scenario 1 then, Personal Area and Personal Sub Area will be shown as per ECC entry. But in second scenario, If one Personal area or Personal Sub Area changed over a period of time that will effect the historical data also.
    For Example if your Personal Sub Area changed on Apr 1, 2011.
    Scenario 1: Report will be as per ECC Data ( from Apr 1, 2011 onwards it will show new Personal Sub Area).
    Scenario 2: Report will show new Personal Sub Area of Personal Area for entire data.
    Hope this will help you.
    Regards,
    Chenna.

  • 'SPROXY' - Multiple PI Systems connected to one ECC System for ABAP Proxies

    Dear Experts
    I am currently facing an issue when I want to connected multiple PI instances to one ECC client for
    ABAP Proxy purposes.
    In transaction 'SPROXY', in the Enterprise Service Brower, only one PI instance is shown and accessable.
    Can this setting be changed to allow multiple PI systems in this Enterprise Service Browser?
    Thanks for your ideas.
    Mathias

    Hi,
    Check these replies.
    R/3 connected to multiple XI instances
    'SPROXY' - Multiple PI Systems connected to one ECC System for ABAP Proxies
    Multiple XI Instances
    Multiple XI instances or multiple app server
    Thanks,
    Vijaya.
    Edited by: Vijaya Lakshmi Palla on Jun 4, 2008 11:43 AM

  • Multiple backend systems for business package ESS/MSS

    Hi,
    I would like to know whether there is a smart solution for connecting the business package ESS/MSS with multiple backend systems (up to 10 systems).
    I am aware of the possibility using parameter "sap-wd-arfc-useSys", but this implies, that content needs to be duplicated n-times in order to be able to maintain the Jco destination suffix.
    Any hint, also for custom built solutions are very welcome!
    Best regards,
    Johannes

    Johannes
    There is some problem with the link
    See this.
    Connecting multiple SAP Systems
    Thread name is 'Connecting multiple SAP Systems'
    Krishna Murthy

  • Single ADS for multiple SAP systems ?

    Can a single ADS installed in a JAVA stack possibly along a EP 7.0 serve multiple SAP systems in my landscape. We got ECC 6.0, EP 7.0, BI 7.0, SRM 5 etc in our landscape. I was wondering whether I can install ADS on any of these systems with Java stack and leverage the functionality to other SAP system or should I have ADS on all the Systems ?
    Help appreciated
    Thanks

    We are using one ADS for more than 10 systems in our product development. It works fine.

  • Need a Data Integration for multiple ERP systems

    We are doing some research into a data integration layer to our BW 7.3/BOBJ 4.0 from multiple ERPs.  Of course we are looking at Data Services and Information Steward in the BOBJ suite but just looking for anybody's recommendations on the topic.
    What technology platform do you use to do the extract, transform, load processes from multiple backend sources into BW?  Any you would advise us to avoid? 

    Hello Edward,
    The answer depends on multiple factors.
    Some pointers:
    Volume and growth of db in scope planning (Federation vs replication )
    If data federation is where you want to move data services / BO tools will be ideal
    If your data is coming from multiple ERP systems you can utilize there delta queue to load data via data services (in case of SAP)
    Use native DB connect/UD connect functionalities in BW as with BW 7.3 its delta capable.
    Moving to BW 7.4 you will have SDA to solve that problem of integration to Non - SAP data into your EDW landscape
    These are pointers but I would say talk to enterprise architects and look into the foresight of wheyare you want to move your EDW platform.
    Cheers!
    Suyash

  • SLT Replication for the same table from Multiple Source Systems

    Hello,
    With HANA 1.0 SP03, it is now possible to connect multiple source systems to the same SLT Replication server and from there on to the same schema in SAP HANA - does this mean same table as well? Or will it be different tables?
    My doubt:
    Consider i am replicating the information from KNA1 from 2 Source Systems - say SourceA and SourceB.
    If I have different records in SourceA.KNA1 and SourceB.KNA1, i believe the records will be added during the replication and as a result, the final table has 2 different records.
    Now, if the same record appears in the KNA1 tables from both the sources, the final table should hold only 1 record.
    Also, if the same Customer's record is posted in both the systems with different values, it should add the records.
    How does HANA have a check in this situation?
    Please throw some light on this.

    Hi Vishal,
    i suggest you to take a look to SAP HANA SPS03 Master Guide. There is a comparison table for the three replication technologies available (see page 25).
    For Multi-System Support, there are these values:
    - Trigger-Based Replication (SLT Replication): Multiple source systems to multiple SAP  HANA instances (one  source system can be connected to one SAP HANA schema only)
    So i think that in your case you should consider BO Data Services (losing real-time analytics capabilities of course).
    Regards
    Leopoldo Capasso

Maybe you are looking for