PF not getting deducted for the mid month joinees.

Hi,
The problem is coming in the PF deduction of the employees who have joined in the mid of the month.
For ex if an employee's basic salary is 7000 and the emp joined in the mid of the month , the system is taking PF from RS 3500 , where PF deduction is not applicable. Now the result is PF is not getting deducted for that month which should not happen.
So kindly guide me how to apply a check in the system so that it deducts the PF of those employees who are joining in the mid of the month and their basic salary is above Rs6500.

check
INPA4
INPA3
INPA2
INPA1
tables V_INPA1 check the configuration once
if u dont want f

Similar Messages

Sales order create/change line item with reference to contract - Open quantity not getting deducted for copied line item from the contract

Hi friends,
Please provide some valuable inputs for the following scenario:
When a sales order line item is created(VA01) or changed(VA02) with reference to a Contract the open quantity is deducted in the contract which is a standard functionality. If the referenced line item is copied (custom enhancement to copy line item), then for the copied line item the open quantity is not getting deducted instead ATP quantity i.e. Available-to-promise is deducted.
Any inputs on how we can fix this functionality i.e. deduct the open quantity from the contract for the copied line item?
P.S. : Custom enhancement to copy line item is working fine, but open quantity is not getting deducted if the copied line item was referenced to a contract.
Thanks,
Sandeep
Message was edited by: sandeep

Sandeep,
Yes, that was my original interpretation. I was having a hard time believing that someone would ask such a question.
I guess, then, that you already know that you will have to add this logic to your enhancement. You should create your specifications and hand them off to a developer; ideally the one who created this enhanced solution in the first place.
I do not provide advice in these forums about details of enhanced solutions. Perhaps one of the other members will be more willing to do your work for you.
Best Regards,
DB49

VA00 condition type not getting determined for the returns order

Hi All,
I have a case where VA00 condition type not getting determined for the returns order that has been created with respect to the billing document.
When the pricing conditions are being copied from invoice it is getting copied but later it is getting deleted in the include LV61AA42.
Note:VA00 condition type is getting deleted from the internal table tkomv[].
If any one came across this scenario can you please help me.
Request your valuable inputs

Hi,
Please check the copy control setting in VTAA.
Maintain the pricing type as "D" at item category level for the respective document type .
Hope this will resolve your issue.
Regards,
Krishna O

Org unit is not getting defaulted for the selected position in infotype0001

Org unit is not getting defaulted for the selected position in infotype 0001 during the hiring action.
In OM Org. units and positions have been created.
The Org. unit to Position relationship is also created.
But inspite of this, In infotype 0001, the after selecting a position, the Org unit is still getting defaulted to "00000000" instead of the Org. unit Id to which the position belongs. (Please note: At the time of selecting the position, I do structure search and the position is shown under the correct Or. unit)
Have I missed any step?

Have u run the RHINTE programmes properly ?
are u able to save the record?
As some times it may be display probolem, if u r able to save the record then check the relationship in pp10/po13.
and U have not answered what Mr. Valeri is asking about your Implementation/support because these type we come accress if data is not uploaded properly.
Regards
vinmax

I have a message: "Could not get session for the OEM Repository."

Dear Sir,
I browsed reports that has been published in OEM. But I received an error:
"Could not get session for the OEM Repository. Check to ensure that the OEM Repository is up."
What can I do?
Thank a lot

You will need to go into your Files and locate the song. By default, iTunes saves songs in the iTunes Media Folder which can be found in the following locations:
Mac OS X: /Users/username/Music
Windows XP: \Documents and Settings\username\My Documents\My Music\
Windows Vista: \Users\username\Music\iTunes
Windows 7 and Windows 8: \Users\username\My Music\iTunes
If you locate your song file, when you try to play it in iTunes, you will be given an option to locate. Navigate to the file in the pop up window and iTunes will re-path the file location.
Most people encounter this issue when moving to a new computer or if you have your music saved on an external drive or folder that you have since moved or removed. The imperative part is finding the song so you can re-map it.

AM 7.1 CDSSO Could not get agent for the realm

Hi,
We are trying to configure the Cookie highjacking fix in AM 7.1 and apache agent 2.2. When we try to go the agent, the browser gets redirected to the Access Manager. After authentication, I get the error message on the browser "resource access denied".
On the AM side, I get following error in amCDC file:
04/19/2007 06:19:19:919 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-3,5,main]
CDCServlet Initializing...
04/19/2007 06:19:19:922 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-3,5,main]
CDCServlet init params. Restricted Token Enabled: false Auth URL Cookie Name: sunIdentityServerAuthNServer Auth URL Cookie Domain:Deployment Descriptor: /amserver
04/19/2007 06:19:19:925 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-3,5,main]
CDCServlet.doGetPost: Query String received: goto=http%3A%2F%2Feauthdev.etc.net%2Fcgi-bin%2Fprintenv%3FsunwMethod%3DGET&RequestID=15432&MajorVersion=1&MinorVersion=0&ProviderID=http%3A%2F%2Feauthdev.etc.net%3A80%2Famagent&IssueInstant=2007-04-19T18%3A19%3A19Z
04/19/2007 06:19:19:934 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-3,5,main]
SSOException caught: com.iplanet.sso.SSOException: Invalid session ID.
04/19/2007 06:19:20:430 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-3,5,main]
Forwarding for authentication to: /UI/Login?goto=%2Famserver%2Fcdcservlet%3FTARGET%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Feauthdev.etc.net%252Fcgi-bin%252Fprintenv%253FsunwMethod%253DGET%26RequestID%3D15432%26MajorVersion%3D1%26MinorVersion%3D0%26ProviderID%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252F
eauthdev.etc.net%253A80%252Famagent%26IssueInstant%3D2007-04-19T18%253A19%253A19Z
04/19/2007 06:19:27:293 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-4,5,main]
CDCServlet.doGetPost: Query String received: TARGET=http%3A%2F%2Feauthdev.etc.net%2Fcgi-bin%2Fprintenv%3FsunwMethod%3DGET&RequestID=15432&MajorVersion=1&MinorVersion=0&ProviderID=http%3A%2F%2Feauthdev.etc.net%3A80%2Famagent&IssueInstant=2007-04-19T18%3A19%3A19Z
04/19/2007 06:19:27:294 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-4,5,main]
WARNING: Advice List is : null
04/19/2007 06:19:27:294 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-4,5,main]
CDCServlet.doGetPost: targetURL = http://eauthdev.etc.net/cgi-bin/printenv?sunwMethod=GET
04/19/2007 06:19:27:294 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-4,5,main]
CDCServlet.doGetPost: gotoURL = http://eauthdev.etc.net/cgi-bin/printenv?sunwMethod=GET
04/19/2007 06:19:27:321 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-4,5,main]
CDC Servlet: Directory matches for http://eauthdev.etc.net:80/ is:{AMIdentity object: id=eauthdev_apache_8080,ou=agent,dc=mycompany,dc=com AMSDKDN=uid=eauthdev_apache_8080,ou=agents,dc=mycompany,dc=com={sunidentityserverdevicestatus=[Active], sunidentityserverdevicekeyvalue=[agentRootURL=http://eauthdev.etc.net:80/]}}
04/19/2007 06:19:27:400 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-4,5,main]
WARNING: Invalid GoTo URL: http://eauthdev.etc.net/cgi-bin/printenv?sunwMethod=GET for Agent ID: http://eauthdev.etc.net:80/
04/19/2007 06:19:27:400 PM PDT: Thread[service-j2ee-4,5,main]
ERROR: CDCServlet.doGetPost:Exception occured
java.lang.Exception: Invalid Agent: Could not get agent for the realm
at com.iplanet.services.cdc.LdapSPValidator.validateAndGetRestriction(LdapSPValidator.java:200)
at com.iplanet.services.cdc.CDCServlet.redirectWithAuthNResponse(CDCServlet.java:288)
at com.iplanet.services.cdc.CDCServlet.doGetPost(CDCServlet.java:247)
at com.iplanet.services.cdc.CDCServlet.doGet(CDCServlet.java:194)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:796)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:917)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.servletService(ApplicationFilterChain.java:391)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:297)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:178)
at com.sun.identity.setup.AMSetupFilter.doFilter(AMSetupFilter.java:86)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:210)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:178)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:270)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invokeInternal(StandardContextValve.java:241)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:182)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:571)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:160)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:571)
at com.sun.webserver.connector.nsapi.NSAPIProcessor.process(NSAPIProcessor.java:149)
at com.sun.webserver.connector.nsapi.NSAPIConnector.service(NSAPIConnector.java:995)
Does anybody knows what is going wrong?
Thanks in advance,
Vivek

One more thing Vivek : seems like the problem comes from the fact that the there's 3 checks done to ensure the goto URL matches what's in the agent profile, and one of them (the port check) fails.
agentRootURL has port 80. The gotoURL doesn't.
Try not specifying a port number for key agentRootURL and tell me if that works.
Side note : it seems you might not have the following property enabled in your AMConfig.properties :
com.sun.identity.enableUniqueSSOTokenCookie = true
HTH,
N.

For the mid month new joiner the annual Conveyance exemption is coming incorrectly

Dear All,
For one of our client, we have have faced a uniqe issue.
If any employee join in the mid of the month, his prorated conveyance amount ( wage type 2020) is coming correctly. Suppose an employee joined at 16th of the month, system is calculating his conveyance for that month as INR 400 and which is correct.
However in his tax calculation for that particular month, system is taking INR 400*(rest of the month of the FY) in the wage type /4E3. which is incorrect. Suppose he joined in 16th April , system is calculating tax exemption 400*12=4800
Now if we run next month payroll , system is caculating the exemption properly. i.e. INR 400 + 800* rest of the month of the FY,
Please help
Regards
Tirtha

Hi Tirtha,
system is calculating perfectly.
first of all system check the no. of present days and accordingly it give the amount in the wage type /3C3 conveyance amount monthly and /3C4 will give Conveyance monthly exemption and it will multiply with no. of months to the fiscal year end and store in the wage type /4E3.
for example check for PF:
Every month PF amount store in WT /3F1 and send to /3F5 and this WT multiplied with No. of months and store the Annual amount in wt /3F6.
Regards,
Praneeth kumar

% is not getting correctly for the Grand Total Row in OBI10g

Hi,We have a report in table view with the following structure.
Name     Target     Act     %Ach
ABC     100     50     50
XYZ     200     10     5
Total     300     60     27.5
The value for the %Ach Total row should be 20% but in the report it is showing as 27.5.
any one observed this ,how to correct this??
Thanks

Hi,
To get grand total correctly..configure instanceconfig.xml and put..
<ReportAggregateEnabled>true</ReportAggregateEnabled> between <serverinstace>..
refer..
http://obiee101.blogspot.com/2009/09/obiee-grand-totals-with-calculated.html
Hope it solves ur problem

Adobe form output not getting displayed for the whole length of the page

Hi All,
I have developed an adobe form using webdynpro application. While testing, the output(pdf) does not occupy the entire page/screen from end-user side. But when I test the same from my side, the output appears fine . Could anyone suggest me on this?
Regards,
Allwin.

Did you check the resolution at end user side? Is it different from your resolution?
To overcome this check what is the height and width you have specified for InteractiveFormUI element in your Web Dynpro application. Have you specified in pixels like 300px? You need to enter it as 100% for both.
Chintan

Income tax issue for mid month joinees

Issue 2:
For New (mid month) joinee at the first month gross salary is calculated based on the earned salary amount *12 months (or no. of remaining months for financial yr end), but in my client income tax deducted based on the actual salary (not earned salary) from the first month onwards.
For example :
Employee X,
Joined date 15.08.2011,
Actual salary = 1,00,000 INR. Earned salary for 15 days = 50,000 INR.
While Start Payroll for the period 5th (August) 2011. The WT /416 Gross salary = 4,00,000 (50000*8). Based on this gross salary income tax calculated, But I want to calculated the gross at first month (august 2011) based on follows,
Gross salary : August month earned salary = 50,000 + Actual salary per month =1,00,000*7 =7,00,000.
Gross salary = 7,50,000 INR.
Please give me some solution
Thanks and regards
Mohan .V

Hi Param Dayal,
New issues rise Now....
For New (mid month) joinee at the first month Exemption U/S 10 is calculated based on the Conveyance Allowance amount *12 months (or no. of remaining months for financial yr end), but in my client income tax Exemption U/S 10 based on the actual salary (not earned salary) from the first month onwards.
For example :
Employee X,
Joined date 15.08.2011,
Conveyance Allowance = 800 INR. Earned Conveyance Allowance for 15 days = 400 INR.
While Start Payroll for the period 5th (August) 2011. The WT /130 Exemption U/S 10 = 3,200 (400*8). Based on this Conveyance Allowance The Exemption U/S 10 calculated, But I want to calculated the Exemption U/S 10 at first month (august 2011) based on follows,
August month earned Conveyance Allowance = 400 INR + Actual Conveyance Allowance per month =800*7 =5,600.
Exemption U/S 10 = 6,000 INR.
Please give me some solution
Thanks and regards
Mohan .V
Edited by: mohantamilan on Sep 26, 2011 2:52 PM

Pension is not getting deducted

Hi Sappers,
Pension is not getting deducted for some employees, I have checked all the tables & nodes under payroll India>Statutory Social Contribution>Provident Fund as well as IT 587 from the DOJ....can any one help me in this regards?
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Can u check In T7INF3 is contribution percentage has been maintained as 8.33%??
Check once again all the tables T7INF1,3,5,7
Is ur PF amount is coming????
Revert Back
Regards
Pavani

Planned order not getting generated for FG

Dear Experts,
Planned orders not getting generated for the Finished Goods - X which is having MRP Type M0 - MPS fixing type strategy group 20 which is copied fron another FG - Y , its a new product and production plan has been updated through MC88 - Rough cut planning but the planned orders are not getting generated.
And for the material valid production version exists with selection method 3 and individullcollective as 1.
Please let me know what might be the possibalities and what all the key fields i need to check.
Thanks & Regards,
Sampath
Edited by: sampath s on Jul 13, 2011 11:31 AM

Dear,
In general MPS is run for High value items ( if you use like Gold , Platimum or A class items. ).
Always only single level is used for Explosion and planning. then only you can analyse the requirements at each stage before procurement.
Otherwise if you run MPS to multi level, Bottom most high value will be procured without any notice to authorities. Even you may cancel the process in mid way. At that time what will happen to the procured high value material.
So for that purpose only single item single level MPS concept is evolved.
Fo that you run MPS at single level so that only for the first level MPS will be carried out.
Check and revert back.\
Regards,
Alok Tiwari

Header Vendor text is not getting displayed for PO in BBP_PD transaction.

Hi Experts,
We are upgrading SRM 3.0 to SRM 7.0 .In the upgraded sys the Header Text 'HTXT' is not getting displayed for the Purchase order created in BBP_PD. For the SCs the Header text field is populated correctly.
Inputs on this will be very helpful.
Regards,
Ravi.K

Ravi,
Check in IMG if the text schema is used in configuring PO transaction type. Define Transaction Types is the setting.
SG

SAP R/3 -- Not getting prompted for password on Heterogeneous Sys. Copy

Thank you in advance. I am part of a project team that is testing the potential of moving from UNIX (AIX 5.3) to Linux (RHEL 4 or 5). We are running SAP R/3 on IBM P570 with DB2 v9.1 and when we run this program: Installation master sapinst
We are not getting prompted for the user password but when we run the same cd on a different system we get prompted for the user's password. Can anyone point me in the right direction on what is wrong? If you need more info let me know.
Thanks,
Erik

@ Sven & Markus
Well I have checked all the logs and there are no errors. What I have found out is that it successfully runs but there is 0 ouput, in essence it isn't exporting any data.
Here it shows that it completed successfully but in the export directory there isn't data when there should be.
INFO 2009-10-08 17:34:19.270 [sixxcstepexecute.cpp:544]
The installation of component Execution of Service SAP ERP 6.0 Support Release 3 > Software Life-Cycle Options > System Copy
> IBM DB2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows > Source System Export > Central System > Based on AS ABAP > Database Instance Export has been completed successfully has been completed successfully.
See here:
/dev/exportlv 119.25 119.23 1% 16 1% /export
Thanks,
Erik

CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE IDOC not getting generated for BUS_TRANS_MSG BDOC

Hello Experts,
In our project, we have a requirement to send custom fields in the BUS_TRANS_MSG to external system through XIF. The model of BDOC BUS_TRANS_MSG triggering IDOC CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M02 perfectly worked in the development system. We wanted to try the custom field extension in the Sandbox. So as per OSS note 916093, we have extended E101_CRMXIF_CUSTOMER_H segments with custom fields and tried generating the interfaces in BDFG transaction. While generation with IDOC CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M we got an error message "Incompatible change to complex data type
type E101CRMXIF_ISU_PRA1_X". So went about creating a custom IDOC ZZ_CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M02 for message CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE. Even for this config, the IDOC is not getting generated for the BDOCs. Lastly, configured the IDOC ZZ_CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M02 to a custom function module ZZ_BDFG_IDOC_TEST_FM. The FM got generated and activated, even then the IDOC is not generated for the BDOC.
SMOEAC config in Sandbox looks the same as the Development system. We do not the reason why IDOC is not getting generated and also the reason for error in BDFG while generating the interfaces after adding custom fields to CUSTOMER_H segment.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Partha

Hi Partha,
Kindly check the following thread.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/406efa7e-388a-2910-f9b8-81913b0ca57f?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true
XIF adapter
Hope it answers your Query
Regards,
Srikanth.Naga

PF not getting deducted for the mid month joinees.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for