Phase MAIN_SHDRUN/ACT_UPG is running for more than 24 hours
Hi All,
we are upgrading our ECC 6.0 system to EHP04 SPS6. and the phase "MAIN_SHDRUN/ACT_UPG" in pre-processing phase is running for more than 32 hours. I am wondering how much time it will go. below are the details of our system:
1. total DB size : 600 GB (used)
2. CPUs: 4 (AIX p5 processors)
3. RAM : 18 GB
4. R3trans/Batch processes selected: 5 (each)
I am able to see the latest entries in log fille under EHPI\abap\tmp.
1 EDO533X*** Activate objects at level "309"
3 EDO635 Not enough work processes (total of "2", "1" can be used)
3 EDO634 * Synchronous execution, no parallel processing *
3 EDO680XSynchronous processing: "0" sec., "11" objects, "12.180" costs
1 EDO533X*** Activate objects at level "310"
3 EDO635 Not enough work processes (total of "2", "1" can be used)
3 EDO634 * Synchronous execution, no parallel processing *
3 EDO680XSynchronous processing: "1" sec., "35" objects, "23.660" costs
some processes are running. I am able to see from topas. it seems to be some I/O issue.
still wondering. how much time it will run. this is the production system.
Thanks,
Mohan
Hi,
> 1 EDO533X*** Activate objects at level "309"
> 3 EDO635 Not enough work processes (total of "2", "1" can be used)
> 3 EDO634 * Synchronous execution, no parallel processing *
> 3 EDO680XSynchronous processing: "0" sec., "11" objects, "12.180" costs
> 1 EDO533X*** Activate objects at level "310"
> 3 EDO635 Not enough work processes (total of "2", "1" can be used)
> 3 EDO634 * Synchronous execution, no parallel processing *
> 3 EDO680XSynchronous processing: "1" sec., "35" objects, "23.660" costs
>
As you can see in the logs system does not have enough work processes to do parallel processing. So, it will take time.
Also how much background work processes your system have ?
Thanks
Sunny
Similar Messages
-
Attach Database running for more than 2 days
Hi,
I have a sql sever 2005 database of SAP development which is having a deferred transaction error while DBCC. After restart the SQL log says the below. Still the DBCC error exists.
2013-04-19 14:27:22.10 spid14s Recovery of database 'BDS' (5) is 99% complete (approximately 3 seconds remain). Phase 2 of 3. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
2013-04-19 14:27:22.10 spid14s 1830496 transactions rolled forward in database 'BDS' (5). This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
2013-04-19 14:27:22.71 spid14s Recovery of database 'BDS' (5) is 99% complete (approximately 3 seconds remain). Phase 3 of 3. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
2013-04-19 14:27:23.34 spid14s CHECKDB for database 'BDS' finished without errors on 2012-10-14 19:22:43.603 (local time). This is an informational message only; no user action is required.
I have copied the mdf, ndf and ldf file to another location and try to attach the database it is running for more than 2 days now. Still not given any error. DVM shows the create database status as running. The SQL Log shows the below
message.
2014-03-29 19:19:52.04 spid52 Recovery of database 'BDS' (8) is 99% complete (approximately 3 seconds remain). Phase 2 of 3. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
2014-03-29 19:19:52.04 spid52 5313464 transactions rolled forward in database 'BDS' (8). This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
2014-03-29 19:19:52.29 spid52 Recovery of database 'BDS' (8) is 99% complete (approximately 3 seconds remain). Phase 3 of 3. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
Please help me to solve this issue.
Regards,
suren>I have copied the mdf, ndf and ldf file to another location and try to attach the database it is running for more than 2 days now.
It is safer to:
1. Backup the database:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms187510.aspx
2. Copy backup file over to destination server
3. Restore the database
Kalman Toth Database & OLAP Architect
SELECT Video Tutorials 4 Hours
New Book / Kindle: Exam 70-461 Bootcamp: Querying Microsoft SQL Server 2012 -
Change Capture For Siebel OLTP task in DAC running for more than 10 hours
whole etl load used to complete in 2 hours (as on now siebel data having sample data). since last Friday Change Capture For Siebel OLTP task in DAC execution plan running for more than 10 hours. I am not able to trouble shoot the problem because no log for this task
what could be the reason for this problem? how can I fix that problem?
Appreciate your help
Thanks
Jay.Which ETL is it that is taking the longest (is it an SDE, SIL, PLP?). I have seen someOracle vanilla ETLs coded in a way that is very ineffective. Check the DAC and Informatica logs and find out which mapping it is and where the delay is (e.g. SQL, write to DB..etc).
-
US Sales Tax Report is running for more than 10 hours
Hi All,
Could any one please suggest us on below issue.
We have observed that "U.S. Sales Tax Report" Concurrent Program is running for more than 10 hours in R12 Production. The system has been upgraded from 11.5.8 to R12. Earlier in 11i, it was running for 1 hour and post upgrade its running more than 10 hours. As this program is a standard Oracle program, We are taking up this issue with Oracle support. But we wanted to know does anyone has the similar issues faced.
Many thanks,
PraveenPl do not post duplicates - US Sales Tax Report is running for more than 10 hours
-
My sql query running for more than 4 hours could some one please help me
Hi ,
I have one sql executable and the query is running for more than 4 hours . Could some one please help me in tuning the sql.
The stats and all the general stuff is intact at db level :
SELECT pasl.item_id item_id
, pv.vendor_name vendor_name
, msif.segment1 item
, NVL(cic.item_cost,0) item_cost
, NVL(pasl.attribute1,0) asl_cost
FROM apps.mtl_system_items_b msif
, apps.po_approved_supplier_list pasl
, apps.cst_item_cost_type_v cic
, apps.po_vendors pv
, apps.po_asl_statuses past
, apps.mtl_item_categories mic
, apps.mtl_categories_b mc
, apps.mtl_category_sets_b mcb
, apps.mtl_category_sets_b mcbm
, apps.mtl_categories_b mcm
, apps.mtl_item_categories micm
WHERE pasl.item_id = msif.inventory_item_id
AND msif.inventory_item_id = cic.inventory_item_id
AND msif.inventory_item_status_code in ('Active','ENG HOLD')
AND cic.cost_type = 'Frozen'
AND msif.organization_id = cic.organization_id
AND EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM apps.mtl_system_items_b msin,
apps.mtl_parameters mpn,
apps.org_organization_definitions oodn
WHERE msin.organization_id = mpn.organization_id
AND mpn.organization_id = oodn.organization_id
AND msin.inventory_item_id = msif.inventory_item_id
AND oodn.operating_unit = :p_ou
AND cic.organization_id = 87
AND NVL(pv.end_date_active,TRUNC(SYSDATE+1)) > TRUNC(SYSDATE)
AND pv.vendor_id = pasl.vendor_id
AND mcbm.structure_id = mcm.structure_id
AND nvl(mcm.start_date_active, (SYSDATE - 1)) < SYSDATE
AND nvl(mcm.end_date_active, (SYSDATE + 1)) > SYSDATE
AND mcbm.category_set_id = 1
AND micm.inventory_item_id = msif.inventory_item_id
AND micm.organization_id = msif.organization_id
AND micm.category_set_id = mcbm.category_set_id
AND micm.category_id = mcm.category_id
AND (SUBSTR(mcm.segment1,1,2) = 'FG' OR msif.item_type LIKE 'FG%')
AND mcm.segment3 NOT IN ('4','5','9','A')
AND mcb.structure_id = mc.structure_id
AND NVL(mc.start_date_active, (SYSDATE - 1)) < SYSDATE
AND nvl(mc.end_date_active, (SYSDATE + 1)) > SYSDATE
AND mcb.category_set_id = 1100000022
AND mic.inventory_item_id = msif.inventory_item_id
AND mic.organization_id = msif.organization_id
AND mic.category_set_id = mcb.category_set_id
AND mic.category_id = mc.category_id
AND SUBSTR(mc.segment2,1,2) = pv.attribute6
AND ROUND(NVL(pasl.attribute1,0),2) <> ROUND(NVL(cic.item_cost,0),2)
AND pasl.asl_status_id = past.status_id
AND UPPER(past.status) = 'APPROVED'
--and pv.attribute6 not in('IN','BG','CT')
and msif.inventory_item_id = :p_item_id42737
UNION
SELECT pasl.item_id item_id
, pv.vendor_name vendor_name
, msif.segment1 item
, NVL(cic.item_cost,0) item_cost
, NVL(pasl.attribute1,0) asl_cost
FROM apps.mtl_system_items_fvl msif
, apps.po_approved_supplier_list pasl
, apps.cst_item_cost_type_v cic
, apps.po_vendors pv
, apps.po_asl_statuses past
, apps.mtl_item_categories mic
, apps.mtl_categories_b mc
, apps.mtl_category_sets_b mcb
, apps.mtl_category_sets_b mcbm
, apps.mtl_categories_b mcm
, apps.mtl_item_categories micm
WHERE pasl.item_id = msif.inventory_item_id
AND msif.inventory_item_id = cic.inventory_item_id
AND msif.inventory_item_status_code in ('Active','ENG HOLD')
AND cic.cost_type = 'Frozen'
AND msif.organization_id = cic.organization_id
AND EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM apps.mtl_system_items_b msin,
apps.mtl_parameters mpn,
apps.org_organization_definitions oodn
WHERE msin.organization_id = mpn.organization_id
AND mpn.organization_id = oodn.organization_id
AND msin.inventory_item_id = msif.inventory_item_id
AND oodn.operating_unit = :p_ou
AND cic.organization_id = 87
AND NVL(pv.end_date_active,TRUNC(SYSDATE+1)) > TRUNC(SYSDATE)
AND pv.vendor_id = pasl.vendor_id
AND mcbm.structure_id = mcm.structure_id
AND NVL(mcm.start_date_active,(SYSDATE - 1)) < SYSDATE
AND NVL(mcm.end_date_active, (SYSDATE + 1)) > SYSDATE
AND mcbm.category_set_id = 1
AND micm.inventory_item_id = msif.inventory_item_id
AND micm.organization_id = msif.organization_id
AND micm.category_set_id = mcbm.category_set_id
AND micm.category_id = mcm.category_id
AND (SUBSTR(mcm.segment1,1,2) = 'FG' OR msif.item_type LIKE 'FG%')
AND mcm.segment3 NOT IN ('4','5','9','A')
AND mcb.structure_id = mc.structure_id
AND NVL(mc.start_date_active,(SYSDATE - 1)) < SYSDATE
AND nvl(mc.end_date_active,(SYSDATE + 1)) > SYSDATE
AND mcb.category_set_id = 1100000022
AND mic.inventory_item_id = msif.inventory_item_id
AND mic.organization_id = msif.organization_id
AND mic.category_set_id = mcb.category_set_id
AND mic.category_id = mc.category_id
AND SUBSTR(mc.segment2,1,2) = pv.attribute6
AND pasl.asl_status_id = past.status_id
AND UPPER(past.status) = 'APPROVED'
--and pv.attribute6 not in('IN','BG','CT')
AND NVL(pasl.attribute1,0) = 0
AND NVL(cic.item_cost,0) != 0
and msif.inventory_item_id = :p_item_id42737
The execution plan displayed in taod is as below :
Plan
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 464 Bytes: 905 Cardinality: 2
140 SORT UNIQUE Cost: 464 Bytes: 905 Cardinality: 2
139 UNION-ALL
69 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 185 Bytes: 446 Cardinality: 1
67 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 180 Bytes: 444 Cardinality: 1
65 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 178 Bytes: 408 Cardinality: 1
63 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 177 Bytes: 404 Cardinality: 1
60 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 176 Bytes: 378 Cardinality: 1
57 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 174 Bytes: 353 Cardinality: 1
55 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 174 Bytes: 349 Cardinality: 1
53 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 174 Bytes: 342 Cardinality: 1
50 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 173 Bytes: 336 Cardinality: 1
48 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 173 Bytes: 332 Cardinality: 1
46 FILTER
45 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 171 Bytes: 322 Cardinality: 1
43 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 169 Bytes: 305 Cardinality: 1
41 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 168 Bytes: 292 Cardinality: 1
38 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 166 Bytes: 277 Cardinality: 1
36 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 166 Bytes: 273 Cardinality: 1
33 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 165 Bytes: 256 Cardinality: 1
30 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 162 Bytes: 237 Cardinality: 1
27 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 161 Bytes: 203 Cardinality: 1
24 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 159 Bytes: 185 Cardinality: 1
22 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 158 Bytes: 163 Cardinality: 1
19 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 156 Bytes: 117 Cardinality: 1
16 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 90 Bytes: 95 Cardinality: 1
13 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 49 Bytes: 72 Cardinality: 1
10 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 8 Bytes: 41 Cardinality: 1
8 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 3 Bytes: 30 Cardinality: 1
5 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2 Bytes: 22 Cardinality: 1
2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE INV.MTL_CATEGORY_SETS_B Cost: 1 Bytes: 11 Cardinality: 1
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_CATEGORY_SETS_B_U1 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
4 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE INV.MTL_CATEGORY_SETS_B Cost: 1 Bytes: 11 Cardinality: 1
3 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_CATEGORY_SETS_B_U1 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
7 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE INV.MTL_DEFAULT_CATEGORY_SETS Cost: 1 Bytes: 8 Cardinality: 1
6 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_DEFAULT_CATEGORY_SETS_U1 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
9 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE PO.PO_ASL_STATUSES Cost: 5 Bytes: 11 Cardinality: 1
12 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE INV.MTL_CATEGORIES_B Cost: 41 Bytes: 93 Cardinality: 3
11 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX INV.MTL__CATEGORIES_B_N2 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 1,426
15 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE INV.MTL_CATEGORIES_B Cost: 41 Bytes: 92 Cardinality: 4
14 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX INV.MTL__CATEGORIES_B_N2 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 1,426
18 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE INV.MTL_ITEM_CATEGORIES Cost: 65 Bytes: 22 Cardinality: 1
17 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX INV.MTL_ITEM_CATEGORIES_N3 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 293
21 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE INV.MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B Cost: 2 Bytes: 46 Cardinality: 1
20 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
23 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_ITEM_CATEGORIES_U1 Cost: 1 Bytes: 22 Cardinality: 1
26 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PO.PO_APPROVED_SUPPLIER_LIST Cost: 2 Bytes: 18 Cardinality: 1
25 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX PO.PO_APPROVED_SUPPLIER_LIST_N1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
29 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PO.PO_VENDORS Cost: 1 Bytes: 34 Cardinality: 1
28 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) PO.PO_VENDORS_U1 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
32 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE BOM.CST_ITEM_COSTS Cost: 3 Bytes: 19 Cardinality: 1
31 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) BOM.CST_ITEM_COSTS_U1 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 1
35 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE BOM.CST_COST_TYPES Cost: 1 Bytes: 17 Cardinality: 1
34 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) BOM.CST_COST_TYPES_U1 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
37 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) BOM.CST_COST_TYPES_U1 Cost: 0 Bytes: 4 Cardinality: 1
40 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE INV.MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B Cost: 2 Bytes: 15 Cardinality: 1
39 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
42 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_TL_U1 Cost: 1 Bytes: 13 Cardinality: 1
44 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_ITEM_CATEGORIES_U1 Cost: 2 Bytes: 17 Cardinality: 1
47 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B_U1 Cost: 2 Bytes: 30 Cardinality: 3
49 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_PARAMETERS_U1 Cost: 0 Bytes: 4 Cardinality: 1
52 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE HR.HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNITS Cost: 1 Bytes: 6 Cardinality: 1
51 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) HR.HR_ORGANIZATION_UNITS_PK Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
54 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) HR.HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNTS_TL_PK Cost: 0 Bytes: 7 Cardinality: 1
56 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_PARAMETERS_U1 Cost: 0 Bytes: 4 Cardinality: 1
59 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE HR.HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATION Cost: 2 Bytes: 25 Cardinality: 1
58 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX HR.HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATIO_FK2 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
62 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE HR.HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATION Cost: 1 Bytes: 26 Cardinality: 1
61 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX HR.HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATIO_FK2 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
64 INDEX FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2 Cost: 1 Bytes: 4 Cardinality: 1
66 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) APPLSYS.FND_LOOKUP_VALUES_U1 Cost: 2 Bytes: 36 Cardinality: 1
68 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE APPLSYS.FND_PRODUCT_GROUPS Cost: 5 Bytes: 2 Cardinality: 1
138 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 278 Bytes: 459 Cardinality: 1
136 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 277 Bytes: 449 Cardinality: 1
134 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 277 Bytes: 445 Cardinality: 1
132 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 277 Bytes: 441 Cardinality: 1
129 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 275 Bytes: 415 Cardinality: 1
127 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 275 Bytes: 408 Cardinality: 1
124 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 274 Bytes: 402 Cardinality: 1
122 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 273 Bytes: 398 Cardinality: 1
120 MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN Cost: 268 Bytes: 373 Cardinality: 1
117 FILTER
116 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 263 Bytes: 371 Cardinality: 1
114 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 261 Bytes: 354 Cardinality: 1
112 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 260 Bytes: 341 Cardinality: 1
110 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 258 Bytes: 305 Cardinality: 1
107 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 256 Bytes: 290 Cardinality: 1
105 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 256 Bytes: 286 Cardinality: 1
102 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 255 Bytes: 269 Cardinality: 1
99 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 252 Bytes: 250 Cardinality: 1
97 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 251 Bytes: 237 Cardinality: 1
95 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 250 Bytes: 215 Cardinality: 1
93 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 249 Bytes: 193 Cardinality: 1
90 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 245 Bytes: 294 Cardinality: 2
87 HASH JOIN Cost: 230 Bytes: 387 Cardinality: 3
85 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE INV.MTL_CATEGORIES_B Cost: 41 Bytes: 92 Cardinality: 4
84 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 90 Bytes: 95 Cardinality: 1
82 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 49 Bytes: 72 Cardinality: 1
79 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 8 Bytes: 41 Cardinality: 1
77 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 3 Bytes: 30 Cardinality: 1
74 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2 Bytes: 22 Cardinality: 1
71 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE INV.MTL_CATEGORY_SETS_B Cost: 1 Bytes: 11 Cardinality: 1
70 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_CATEGORY_SETS_B_U1 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
73 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE INV.MTL_CATEGORY_SETS_B Cost: 1 Bytes: 11 Cardinality: 1
72 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_CATEGORY_SETS_B_U1 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
76 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE INV.MTL_DEFAULT_CATEGORY_SETS Cost: 1 Bytes: 8 Cardinality: 1
75 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_DEFAULT_CATEGORY_SETS_U1 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
78 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE PO.PO_ASL_STATUSES Cost: 5 Bytes: 11 Cardinality: 1
81 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE INV.MTL_CATEGORIES_B Cost: 41 Bytes: 93 Cardinality: 3
80 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX INV.MTL__CATEGORIES_B_N2 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 1,426
83 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX INV.MTL__CATEGORIES_B_N2 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 1,426
86 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE PO.PO_VENDORS Cost: 139 Bytes: 15,980 Cardinality: 470
89 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PO.PO_APPROVED_SUPPLIER_LIST Cost: 13 Bytes: 18 Cardinality: 1
88 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX PO.PO_APPROVED_SUPPLIER_LIST_N3 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 64
92 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE INV.MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B Cost: 2 Bytes: 46 Cardinality: 1
91 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
94 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_ITEM_CATEGORIES_U1 Cost: 1 Bytes: 22 Cardinality: 1
96 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_ITEM_CATEGORIES_U1 Cost: 1 Bytes: 22 Cardinality: 1
98 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_TL_U1 Cost: 1 Bytes: 13 Cardinality: 1
101 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE BOM.CST_ITEM_COSTS Cost: 3 Bytes: 19 Cardinality: 1
100 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) BOM.CST_ITEM_COSTS_U1 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 1
104 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE BOM.CST_COST_TYPES Cost: 1 Bytes: 17 Cardinality: 1
103 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) BOM.CST_COST_TYPES_U1 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
106 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) BOM.CST_COST_TYPES_U1 Cost: 0 Bytes: 4 Cardinality: 1
109 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE INV.MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B Cost: 2 Bytes: 15 Cardinality: 1
108 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
111 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) APPLSYS.FND_LOOKUP_VALUES_U1 Cost: 2 Bytes: 36 Cardinality: 1
113 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_TL_U1 Cost: 1 Bytes: 13 Cardinality: 1
115 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_ITEM_CATEGORIES_U1 Cost: 2 Bytes: 17 Cardinality: 1
119 BUFFER SORT Cost: 266 Bytes: 2 Cardinality: 1
118 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE APPLSYS.FND_PRODUCT_GROUPS Cost: 5 Bytes: 2 Cardinality: 1
121 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE HR.HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATION Cost: 5 Bytes: 25 Cardinality: 1
123 INDEX FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2 Cost: 1 Bytes: 4 Cardinality: 1
126 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE HR.HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNITS Cost: 1 Bytes: 6 Cardinality: 1
125 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) HR.HR_ORGANIZATION_UNITS_PK Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
128 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) HR.HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNTS_TL_PK Cost: 0 Bytes: 7 Cardinality: 1
131 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE HR.HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATION Cost: 2 Bytes: 26 Cardinality: 1
130 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX HR.HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATIO_FK2 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
133 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_PARAMETERS_U1 Cost: 0 Bytes: 4 Cardinality: 1
135 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_PARAMETERS_U1 Cost: 0 Bytes: 4 Cardinality: 1
137 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) INV.MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B_U1 Cost: 1 Bytes: 10 Cardinality: 1
Regards,
Siva.Welcome to the forums !
Pl post details of OS, database and EBS versions.
Pl see these threads on how to post a tuning request -
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
When your query takes too long ...
HTH
Srini -
REQUEST RUNNING FOR MORE THAN ONE DAY - HOW INVESTIGATE ABOUT THIS
Hi Everyone ...
As you know when you submit any request throigh concurrent manager . The request completed normal or give warning or error .
My probelm I have request running for more than one day .but I don't know right tool how invetigate about this issue .
I checked alert log and database lock but nothing wierd .
We are using 11.5.10.2 with 10.2.0.4 DB .
Thanks in advance ...
Edited by: user12010537 on 26/09/2010 05:39 ص
Edited by: user12010537 on 26/09/2010 05:46 صHi,
schavali wrote:
Use MOS Doc 735119.1 (How to Find Database Session & Process Associated with a Concurrent Program Which is Currently Running) to determine the PID of the concurrent request, then follow the steps identified in MOS Doc 1058210.6 (How to Enable SQL_TRACE for Another Session or in MTS Using Oradebug)
enable tha trace
Re: enable tha trace
Thanks,
Hussein -
Error message that no virtual memory pops up & crashes when application is run for more than 1 hour
My application uses VISA serial operations. It has arrays to store data collected from various devices. I reinitialise the arrays each time the index reaches 50.
Data acquisitions is carried out in separate threads by invoking the runVI method.
When i run the application on Win XP continuaously for more than 1 hour it gives an error message that no more virtual memory to complete the task and the system hangs up.
I open the serial port only once and close it when the application is terminated. But serial read/write operations are done continuaously
Is the error caused due to memory leakage? How can i solve the problem. It's very urgent and i shall be thankful if i ge
t the help.Yes, it sounds like a memory leakage (either that or you're trying to run an advanced app on an old computer w/ little memory and a small hard drive).
Things to try:
1. Ensure it's only labview, and not say labview and another application interacting. This isn't a likely case, but you never know what people have on their boxes and I've seen some weird things with virus scanners. Hit Ctrl-Shift-Esc to get the task manager. Go to processes and watch the memory consumption (click Memory twice to sort in descending order) of the various processes. If labview keeps rising, you've got a leak.
2. If only a reasonable amount of memory is being used, double check your page file settings (read virtual memory).
From the Control Panel
Select System
Select
Advanced Tab
Under Performance, select the Settings button
Select Advanced Tab
Under Virtual Memory, let windows dynamically adjust the page file (and any XP speed tweakers out there can now chime in about how wrong this is. This essentially allows windows to keep upping the virtual memory as needed by various processes.
3. Find the leak. In LV Tools->Advanced->Profile VIs. Turn on memory stats. Start the profiler. Start your vi. If the vi crashes labview totally, you'll have to keep hitting snapshot to find the leaky vi (the one that's memory keeps growing).
4. Upload the vi to the forum so we can give it a looksee.
G'luck
2006 Ultimate LabVIEW G-eek. -
REPORTCRASH UNDER Yosemite 10.10.1 is running for more than 2 hours and 30 mn.
I ran the update to Yosemite 10.10.1 on Imac (21.5, Mid 2011) with
Processor 2,5 GHz Intel Core i5
Memory 12 G 1333 MHz DDR3
Since then, the program ReportCrash is using more than 175% of the processor! and for more than 2 hours and 45 minutes.
I have rebooted the system but the operation ReportCrash restarted from zero.
Do you have a solution?Go to Finder > Applications > Utilities > Activity Monitor, then look at CPU to see the processes and kill the ReportCrash process.
Why are you running ReportCrash? That is a developer program...see the information on it and its use by going to Finder > Applications > Utilities and open Terminal. At the Terminal prompt type: man report crash to see all of the details. -
I had been updating my Windows Vista 64 bit system and as a result of a problem, had to reboot my system. Afterwards, I was no longer able to access iTunes. I got a message stating that there was a problem with some of the files associated with the application. A phone rep at Apple's Customer Service provided me with emails linking instructions on completely uninstalling and reinstalling iTunes. I did the uninstall, then checked for lingering iTunes files and couldn't completely remove some, but tried intalling the latest version of iTunes. It has been running for roughly 24 hours. The status bar is green all the way across, and when I try to cancel, I get the following message: "Are you sure you want to cancel iTunes installation?" I keep hitting "no," but am staring to wonder if there is a problem with the install. Should it take this long if I have roughly 134 gigs of music? I can still see the music in my computer's C drive, so I am worried that there is an error, perhpas because I didn't clear out all the lingering C:\Program Files\Common Files\Apple\ and all the lingering C:\Program Files\iTunes\. Any thoughts?
It is not just the HP. I have 3 HP computes and 2 Dell computers. 2 of the HP and 1 Dell suffer the iTunes internet block. Took me a while to figure it out also. But, the one thing that is different on the Dell, is that I can leave iTunes installed and not open it and everything works. As soon as I open it, internet access goes down. BUT secure sites (https:) works fine.
-
Pre-Execution phase is beginning running for more than an hour
Hi guys,
I am trying to pull data from MSSQL Server 2000 (has over 400 Million rows of data) into MSSQL 2012 using SSIS (using the SQL Command Access Mode).
For over an hour I started running the package, it was just showing Pre-Exectuing Phase is Beginning...
Please want can I do to stop this.
N/B: I tried using the Table or View Access Mode and it started running.
Thanks
meI have found what the issue is.
I added with (NOLOCK) in my query and it has moved to Execution Phase not.
me -
User Defined Activity "hangs" Process Flow if it runs for more than 10mins
I have been using OWB (10g r2) for a while and have used "User Defined" activities in production process flows successfully before.
However my problem now is that the activity (shell command) I want to perform, takes more than 10 minutes to complete. If I run the process flow with a parameter that generates a shell command that executes in two or three minutes, the process flow continues past the sucessfully executed user defined activity to the next activity.
BUT
If I run the same process flow (without modification or even redeployment) with a different parameter , the user defined acivity sucessfully executes (after about 11 minutes or so) but the process flow , doesnt seem to know that it is finished and just says it is still executing.
my "user defined" activity has
COMMAND: /usr/bin/ksh
PARAMETER_LIST bound to a variable which is set earlier in the process flow.
RESULT_CODE:
SCRIPT :
SUCESS_THRESHOLD : 0
by examining (RUNTIME CONTROL CENTER SCHEMA).all_rt_audit_execution_params
I can see that the variable contents assigned to RESULT_CODE look like this
'/usr/bin/rsh -n WINSRV1 dtsrun /usa /ppw /S WINSQLSRV /N JOBNAME_SHORT'
or this
'/usr/bin/rsh -n WINSRV1 dtsrun /usa /ppw /S WINSQLSRV /N JOBNAME_LONG'
I put the -n in because I thought that may have been the problem, but I think its more likely that there is come sort of ".properties" in a runtime file that needs to be set to control the "timeout" of user defined activities.
(like in Runtime.properties
property.RuntimePlatform.0.NativeExecution.Shell.security_constraint = NATIVE_JAVA
except maybe
.........Nativeexecution.timeout = .....?????
Has anybody had a problem like this? Found a document describing available configuration properties for PF activites?
Can anyone help?I have been using OWB (10g r2) for a while and have used "User Defined" activities in production process flows successfully before.
However my problem now is that the activity (shell command) I want to perform, takes more than 10 minutes to complete. If I run the process flow with a parameter that generates a shell command that executes in two or three minutes, the process flow continues past the sucessfully executed user defined activity to the next activity.
BUT
If I run the same process flow (without modification or even redeployment) with a different parameter , the user defined acivity sucessfully executes (after about 11 minutes or so) but the process flow , doesnt seem to know that it is finished and just says it is still executing.
my "user defined" activity has
COMMAND: /usr/bin/ksh
PARAMETER_LIST bound to a variable which is set earlier in the process flow.
RESULT_CODE:
SCRIPT :
SUCESS_THRESHOLD : 0
by examining (RUNTIME CONTROL CENTER SCHEMA).all_rt_audit_execution_params
I can see that the variable contents assigned to RESULT_CODE look like this
'/usr/bin/rsh -n WINSRV1 dtsrun /usa /ppw /S WINSQLSRV /N JOBNAME_SHORT'
or this
'/usr/bin/rsh -n WINSRV1 dtsrun /usa /ppw /S WINSQLSRV /N JOBNAME_LONG'
I put the -n in because I thought that may have been the problem, but I think its more likely that there is come sort of ".properties" in a runtime file that needs to be set to control the "timeout" of user defined activities.
(like in Runtime.properties
property.RuntimePlatform.0.NativeExecution.Shell.security_constraint = NATIVE_JAVA
except maybe
.........Nativeexecution.timeout = .....?????
Has anybody had a problem like this? Found a document describing available configuration properties for PF activites?
Can anyone help? -
I have tried downloading the update for Firefox 3 times, but had to go to bed before it was finiahed....seemed to be more than 45 minutes is this normal? How long should it take?
Since the maximum OS X version for an eMac is 10.5, how are you running OS X 10.7.5 on the eMac?
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1591 -
Export of CDCLS table running for more than 72 hours
Hello ,
We are doing a Combined Upgrade and Unicode Conversion of CRM 4.0
system to CRM 7.0(Running Oracle 10.2) . We have run parallel
Export/import . The Export and Import of all tables have finished
except CDCLS , whcih is being runnign for almost 72 hours now . We did
5 splits for the table and have used the latest R3load available .
Can you please suggest any ways in which we can speed up the
export/import of this table .
We have seen Note 936441 - Oracle settings for R3load based system copy.
As the Export is already running , i am not sure if i can make any changes now to the database .
The Server has 8 CPU and 20 GB of RAM, AIX 5.3
Thanks
Prasanna> There is only 1 table being processed by R3load and i have given 16 parallel processes .
if that is the last table to be exported - yes.
> Do i have any options now , may be to speed up Import when Export is finished ?
No.
You could stop the export, split it (manually) using R3ta and export it in parallel, then it will also be imported in parallel.
Markus -
Reporting running for more than 30 min and still says retrieving the data
Hi,
I created a report using a view, and in RPD for a measure column I put the aggregation AVG.
In front end when I pull the column , if the column is placed in measure or column the report is displaying in 30 sec. But I want the report in rows section, when I place the column in row , the report is running for longer time and not displaying the data, Please help, any help is highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
SR
Edited by: user9255588 on Apr 14, 2013 5:22 PMKindly chk the physical query and execute it in DB and chk its taking the same time
If not chk the join conditions any circular joins present
Hope it helps
Regards,
Nandha -
Phase MAIN_SHDRUN/ACT_UPG hanging?
<h5>
I am upgrading from NW 7.0 Enhancement Package 1 (7.01) using SAPEhpi. The SAPEhpi tools shows that the ABAP progress has status RUNNING 'Executing phase MAIN_SHDRUN/ACT_UPG', and J2EE progress has status WAITING 'Waiting for synchronization event PREPUPTIME=FINISHED'. The status has been the same for the last three days. I understand that long run times are not unusual for this phase, but I have my doubts due to the below circumstances.
<h5>
The shadow instance and standard instance is installed on the same server. I got lots of activation errors '8' in phase MAIN_SHDRUN/ACT_UPG as seen from Filepath:...\EHPI\abap\log\SAPehpiConsole.log
<h5>
Checks after phase MAIN_SHDRUN/ACT_UPG were negative!
<h5>
Last error code set: Process 'tp.exe' exited with 8, see
'C:\SAP_Download\EHPI\abap\tmp\MSGOUT.LOG' for details Check logfiles
'ACTUPG.ELG' and 'C:\SAP_Download\EHPI\abap\log\SAPehpi.ECO'
01) - Repeat phase ACT_UPG to continue at the point it stopped
02) * Initialize phase ACT_UPG to restart it from the beginning
03) - Accept non-severe errors and repeat phase ACT_UPG
04) - Exit this program
Choose action: Initialize phase ACT_UPG to restart it from the beginning
<h5>
>> 2009/11/21 05:20:35 START OF PHASE MAIN_SHDRUN/ACT_UPG
<h5>
running C:\SAP_Download\EHPI\abap\exe\tp.exe pf=C:\SAP_Download\EHPI\abap\bin\SHADOW.TPP checkimpdp AII
Collecting adjustments ...
<h5>
<h5>
But before i initialized the phase ACT_UPG I realised that the shadow instance was unable to connect to the message server. The disp+work was yellow with message 'could not connect to message server'. The DEFAULT.PFL profile for the shadow instance showed the following parameter for the message server: rdisp/msserv = 3607. So I changed the DEFAULT.PFL of the shadow instance to point to the message server of the standard instance. The standard instance nr. = 5, while the shadow instance nr. = 7.
<h5>
rdisp/mshost = turin-1
<h5>
rdisp/msserv = sapmsAII
<h5>
rdisp/msserv_internal = 3905
<h5>
I restarted the shadow instance using SAPMMC for Windows and the message server was then green. I chose to Initialize phase ACT_UPG as option 02) * Initialize phase ACT_UPG to restart it from the beginning.
<h5>
After this decision I can not see any entries in any logs in EHPI directories except the below log. No action for 3 days now, still waiting.....I can log on to the shadow instance using DDIC user but for other users I get message that 'Upgrade still running: Logon not possible'.
<h5>
Any ideas? How can I really determine if the upgrade is still running?
<h5>
Filepath:...\EHPI\sdt\trc\server.trc
<h5>
Nov 24, 2009 1:33:23 AM [Error]: com.sap.sdt.engine.core.communication.AbstractCmd.log(AbstractCmd.java:101) [Thread[ExecuteWorker,5,main]]: Execution of command com.sap.sdt.engine.core.communication.CmdActionEvent@71475e19 failed: null
Nov 24, 2009 1:33:23 AM [Error]: com.sap.sdt.engine.core.communication.AbstractCmd.log(AbstractCmd.java:102) [Thread[ExecuteWorker,5,main]]: java.lang.NullPointerException: null
Nov 24, 2009 1:33:23 AM [Error]: com.sap.sdt.engine.core.communication.AbstractCmd.log(AbstractCmd.java:102) [Thread[ExecuteWorker,5,main]]: java.lang.NullPointerException: null
Nov 24, 2009 1:33:23 AM [Error]: com.sap.sdt.engine.core.communication.CmdActionEvent [Thread[ExecuteWorker,5,main]]: java.lang.NullPointerException
at com.sap.sdt.engine.core.admin.AbstractServerAdmin.getClientConnection(AbstractServerAdmin.java:192)
at com.sap.sdt.server.core.controls.ServerControlFactory.getConsumer(ServerControlFactory.java:102)
at com.sap.sdt.server.core.controls.ServerControlFactory.register(ServerControlFactory.java:83)
at com.sap.sdt.server.core.controls.SDTControlFactory.createFrame(SDTControlFactory.java:114)
at com.sap.sdt.server.core.controls.SDTFrame.createDelegate(SDTFrame.java:119)
at com.sap.sdt.server.core.controls.SDTBase.getDelegate(SDTBase.java:127)
at com.sap.sdt.server.core.controls.SDTFrame.<init>(SDTFrame.java:41)
at com.sap.sdt.server.core.admin.SDTServerAdmin.getFrame(SDTServerAdmin.java:358)
at com.sap.sdt.dsu.ui.AbstractUpgradeViewManager.showBreakPointScreen(AbstractUpgradeViewManager.java:622)
at com.sap.sdt.dsu.ui.AbstractUpgradeViewManager.actionBreak(AbstractUpgradeViewManager.java:417)
at com.sap.sdt.dsu.ui.AbstractUpgradeViewManager.performMenuAction(AbstractUpgradeViewManager.java:160)
at com.sap.sdt.dsu.service.controls.DSUToolListener.actionPerformed(DSUToolListener.java:48)
at com.sap.sdt.server.core.controls.SDTActionListener$Listener.actionPerformed(SDTActionListener.java:49)
at com.sap.sdt.engine.core.communication.CmdActionEvent.actOnEvent(CmdActionEvent.java:38)
at com.sap.sdt.engine.core.communication.CmdEvent.execute(CmdEvent.java:54)
at com.sap.sdt.engine.core.communication.ExecWorker.handleCmd(ExecWorker.java:48)
at com.sap.sdt.engine.core.communication.AbstractWorker.run(AbstractWorker.java:85)<h5>
I was able to continue the upgrade by resetting the DEFAULT.PDF profile with original message server: rdisp/msserv = 3607 information, and restart the shadow instance.
<h5>
Had to follow other forum advice and disregard activation errors in ACT_UPG phase.
<h5>
But the shadow instance disp+work is still not able to connect to the message server, even if I can see that the message server is running green for the shadow instance. There must be something wrong with the parameters in the DEFAULT.PDF profile. Can someone please post an example for a DEFAULT.PDF profile so that I can compare the content?
<h5>
Hopefully I will not get stuck later in the upgrade process?
Maybe you are looking for
-
Support Photoshop Elements 5 Stacks and Version Sets
I would like to see stacks in Lightroom that work the same way as those in the Photoshop Elements 5 Organizer. PSE5 stacks are far more capable than Lightroom ones. (Can stack across multiple folders, can include version sets in stacks, etc.) Additio
-
Transfer Requirement with Inbound delivery.
Hi Guys, I have the following problem: The Warehouse is HU managed. When I have a Purchase Order and I do a Goods Receipt the system is creating a Material Document and in addition a Transfer Requirement. But When I have a Purchase Order and I have a
-
PackageMaker postflight script to reindex Spotlight?
Hello, I've put together a PackageMaker installer that installs a Spotlight plugin, and runs a postflight script that includes a command based on this one: /usr/bin/mdimport -r /Library/Spotlight/Yourplug-in which is taken from Apple's support page h
-
Steps for Bi Reports based on WEB Services
Hi, I am new to BI Publisher. I want to call a OBI report (developed using Answer) from BI Publisher using Web Services. Can some please let me know the steps? Thanks Anil
-
Hi, can u some help to rewrite or tune this quer. SELECT 20100201 PERIOD_KEY,CONSUMER_KEY,DOW_KEY PREFDOW,nvl(FIN_SCOR_DOW,-1),'MONTH' GRANULAR FROM SELECT CONSUMER_KEY,DOW_KEY,FIN_SCOR_DOW, ROW_NUMBER() OVER ( PARTITION BY CONSUMER_KEY ORDER BY FIN