Phasing out ECC 6.0 Certification

Hi,
From my resources i come to know that SAP is phasing out there ECC 6.0 Certification w.e.f 31st dec 2010. Is this true, wat if someis just enroll in the course and will not able to give the exam by december.
Regards,
Kapil.

Hi Kapil,
Yes its tru that ECC 6.0 is phasing out and only tfin52_64 based on the enhancement pack wil be available for certification from now on.
And as far as the certification goes, all the institutes have got prior guidelines from SAP itself in the month of november, as not to give anymore enrollments into that module as one needs to complete 200 hrs. of training.
In case u are talkin about the e learing part in which a student has 5 mnths to prepare and has enorlled for the same but hv nt givn the certification yet, he must have been given prior deadlines by the institute to appear for the same.If still not appearing then a fresh new enrollment needs to be done onto the newer version.
Rgds,
Prashant

Similar Messages

ECC 5.0 version phased out for certificaiton

Hi Gurus
I had applied for direct certification for SD module to SAP. Since i was eligible my profile got approved by SAP and hence i was eligible to give that certification exam for ECC 5.0. I completed all the formalities like sending the DD, Required consent letter, supporting letter from company etc etc.
As per the policy i am suppose to give the exam within the 4 months after they receive the documents,
i received their confirmation of "documents received" on 14th Aug 2009.
So that means i can give the exam till 14th Dec 2009
When i mailed them today for some info regarding the exam they suddenly said that ECC 5.0 has been phased out from 18th sept 2009 and hence I am not allowed to appear for exam. I was prepared and wanted to give exam on 16th Oct as per their schedule. But now i can't. I requested them to allow me for ECC 6.0 which they are denying.
I am wondering what kind of policy they have.They didn't even intimate me that it has been phased out.Haven't I mail them today i wouldn't have even known that it has been phased out and i cannot give the exam.
Is there anything else i can do. I want to give my certification exam. I am thoroughly prepared and have invested lot of time in my preparation.
Please suggest what can be done
Looking forward for some positive inputs
Regards,
D Patel

Can anyone please suggest an alternative

SAP LPO (supported or phased-out?)

We are evaluating implementing SAP LPO. Own the licenses. Is LPO supported or phased-out product by SAP? Is any functionality of LPO migrated into ECC and APO?
What is the typical time frame to implement LPO? We have 18 manufacturing sites. We use ECC and APO. Currently forecast demand and issue production plan based on the demand forecast. Moving towards lean inventory and produce based on replenishment needs.
Is it required to install and run LPO on separate server? Can it co-exist with ECC on the same server? Any pros or cons?
Your insight would immensely help.
Thanks,
Satish

Satish,
LPO is not part of APO. Try using the search feature here. Or, try the xAPPs forum.
Best Regards,
DB49

SAP ECC 6.0 Certification: TFIN50, TFIN52, ERP001, ERP020, SAP125, SM001

MODERATOR: All points have been UNASSIGNED and the thread LOCKED. Please do not share email addresses or links to copyrighted or company confidential information on these forums. If you have some information, please consider posting it to the [Wiki|https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPFI/Home] rather than sharing via email. Thank you for your assistance.
Hi Guys,
Could anybody please suggest me the books & materials for SAP ECC 6.0 Certification. I am taking exam for "SAP Certified Solution Consultant Financials - Financial Accounting with SAP ERP 2005"
Also how to get these materials: TFIN50, TFIN52, ERP001, ERP020, SAP125, SM001
Thank You...

Hello!
I would also like the materials ERP001, ERP020, SAP125...
Could anyone please send them to me at my gmail address: tonia.antonopoulou
thanks in advance!!!

AQ to be phased out and replaced by Weblogic JMS??

I work at a large company in Los Angeles and was recently in a meeting with our architecture team where i was trying to make a case for using AQ for some internal apps.
I had not used AQ in the past but found it very easy to set up and get running in a proof of concept test case.
However, in my meeting I was informed by our main architect that:
1) AQ was not an enterprise solution and had never been fully completed or vetted in production environments.
2) AQ queues "get stuck" when processing large numbers of messages.
3) Contacts at Oracle had told him that AQ is being phased out in the very near term in favor of JMS Queues in Weblogic.
Based on the above statements by our architecture group, our company has essentially disallowed any development on AQ.
Are these statements true?
Thanks.

Your architect is incorrect on multiple counts.
1. AQ is definitely in use as an enterprise solution in a wide variety of very larger "name" corporations.
2. So do insert statements. The statement has no meaning unless it has a context. Have this person state the hardware, operating system, database version, and metrics and present the numbers. Try to not to gloat when they can't. Everything has a limitation. But my bet is they have no idea what AQ's is.
3. Ask for the name and contact information for the person at Oracle that made that statement: It is preposterous on its face. AQ is a foundation technology in RAC, Streams, the Grid Control, and numerous other technologies. Oracle is not removing these technologies from the database any more than they are going to force all database customers to install middleware.
The only thing that should be removed is your architect for a lack of being honest with the team and management.
Feel free to have your management contact me directly at the university if they wish to have me confirm what I have written here.

Phased out material

Hi Gurus,
When a material is to be phased-out the field X-plant material status in the material master view Basic 1 is used. This then inform then user when creating a purchase- and sales order that the product is to be phased-out.
When I create the sales order I need to see the warning/error message or it should not allow me to save order with phase out material.
Can you please explain where and what settings to be check in the system to avoid that as presently we have that problem.
Thanks
Bawa

Hi
material inactive
Go to OVSU, select "01" and click on blue lens on top so that you will see some list of tabs. In that maintain B in Block for order field and save.
Now go to material master Sales: sales org.1 tab and assign 01 for the field X-distr.chain status. By doing so, for that particular material, sale order cannot be created from any sales area
Hope this helps you This should 100% fulfill your rtequirement
Regards
Raja
Edited by: ramanathan raja on Nov 12, 2008 8:14 PM

Is OS 10.3.9 (and PowerPC Macs) being phased out?

Does anyone know if OS 10.3.9 is being phased out by most publishers (it seems like the majority of applications for OS X will only run on 10.4.x!)? also, anyone know if OS 10.5 will run fast enough (and/or compatible) with PowerPC Macs? my assumption is that OS 10.5 will end the lives of all PowerPC Macs, but I would be surprised if it even ran on any older Mac (because 10.4 doesn't seem to run too well as it stands right now!) thanks for your insight and help!
(PS) anyone know if it is even worth my time to repair my iBook G4, or just get a new Mac Mini? my warranty expired on 5/4/07, and I just wonder if this laptop is even worth getting repaired anymore! Thanks

Well, the iBook is a "consumer" laptop, meaning it wasn't the fastest Mac when it was new. The iLife apps, and many new apps are written to take advantage of faster Macs. My 1.6 GHz G5 tower is much faster than any G4 I've ever used, and the new Intel Macs seem even snappier. You'd definitely notice a speed boost if you got a new MacBook, and you could expec t 10.5 to run just fine. As the other post mentioned, we shouldn't speculate about 10.5 on G4's (I would expect a slowdown). As for replacing your iBook, if you're unhappy with the performance and can afford a new Mac, it's worth considering. 10.4 does seem a bit snappier to me, provided you have enough memory. 768 is quite a bit, but many folks suggest 1GB.
hth
Jeff

Is AT&T phasing out DSL

Is AT&T totally phasing out DSL and going strictly U-Verse? I was browsing internet options for a friend, and also checking for myself (in a different town) and every time I look at Internet (not U-Verse) it defaults to a U-Verse internet option. I don't want Cox because last time I tried them, which was years ago, I quit after 6 months since I had to reset my modem on a daily basis. AT&T has been extremely reliable but I don't want to be forced into U-Verse. Other options are smaller companies that I am not sure about reliability.

The rumor is, ATT is phasing out the legacy dsl (adsl2) in most markets by 2020.The standard rule of thumb is, new service is via u-verse, and in areas where u-verse expands into, legacy dsl goes away.However, I am also hearing stories of folks who are getting "new" legacy dsl service in areas that are serviced by u-verse, and have been for years. And, occasional exceptions where dsl customers are allowed to keep their service even after the u-verse moves in.Not meaning to confuse the issue, u-verse itself is based on DSL protocols, just different from the adsl2. (you can google the technical specs of the protocols u-verse uses, if you are really interested.. I just want to keep this post as simple as I can.)Not advertised, as that is not the preferred service offered, but the new u-verse connection boxes CAN support legacy dsl connections, but they prefer to use the newer protocols instead. (Don't believe me, ask one of the install techs the next time you see one. Just, be nice to him when you ask, please.)ATT has it's heart set on u-verse for its future. Don't like it, you will have to look for service elsewhere. There are markets where ATT's u-verse is not allowed due to monopoly agreements. So, it's not going to be everywhere.. but, they are going to it in every market allowed. There are always other internet service options, but not all are priced resonably. Still, you make your choice and live with it. Enough rant. later.

Apple phasing out Firewire?

So, I've been trying to figure out a solution to not only my full internal hard drive on my G4 but to also extending my wireless network and running iTunes off an external drive and streaming it through my stereo on the other side of the house.
A friend pointed out Airport Express, which has ethernet, USB and an audio jack, but no Firewire. He also mentioned he heard Apple was phasing out Firewire on the next generation of laptops. Perhaps then, not a coincidence its absence on the Express.
Any truth to this? This will affect my solution, as my laptop apparently only has USB 1.1, but purchasing a new Express would enable a USB 2.0 drive to be used. Though I would prefer not to have my external hard drive sitting on top of my stereo.
Furthermore, anyone know what USB version is on the old, flying saucer shaped Airport Extreme? I bought it at the same time as the G4 (about 6 years ago), so I'm wondering if I'm stuck all around with USB 1.1.
Another connection issue, then, is how do I connect my new external hard drive (which will house my iTunes folder) to an additional smaller drive to back up the main drive (iTunes)? Can I do this through the old Airport Extreme Base Station just using ethernet or USB?
(At least one commenter has pointed out that my USB on my G4 should be 2.0, however I have found that not to be the case.)
Thanks, and sorry if this is more confusing than enlightening.

There was never any production 15" Aluminum Powerbook G4 that had USB 1.1 ports. Either System Profiler is reporting erroneously all on its own (not an unknown occurrence), or an improper OS software installation on your machine is failing to support USB 2.0 and causing the mistaken report by System Profiler. I don't know whether or not the latter hypothesis is actually a possibility.
FireWire is not being phased out by Apple. Every current Apple notebook except the $999 plastic MacBook has at least a FireWire 800 port (backward compatible with FireWire 400 devices through an under-$10 adapter). Top-of-the line MacBook Pros have dual FW 400 and FW 800 ports. All current Mac Pros, iMacs and Mac Minis have FireWire ports.
I can't find any specifications that tell whether the USB ports in Airport Extreme base stations past or present are USB 1.1 or USB 2.0. I suggest posting your question about that in the appropriate Airport forum. Choose one here:
http://discussions.apple.com/category.jspa?categoryID=140
The usual and by far the best response to a full internal hard drive is to replace it with a larger one. Unless you already have a 320GB internal HD in your Powerbook, consider installing one.
Message was edited by: eww

The new Macbooks and MacBook Pros - Firewire being phased out?

Hi,
Many thanks in advance for your attention.
With the latest release of MacBooks and MacBook Pros, does it seem to anyone else that Firewire is being phased out? Even the new iPod Touch's cannot be charged via a Firewire cable.
(The first iPod Touch has a Firewire/ USB compatible dock).
I am somewhat baffled as a year ago Firewire was all the rage for Video Editing. It had a better reputation for sustained transfer of data and not dropping frames.
(Critical with video editing).
Also - the several miniDV cameras I've owned, including my current model, all transfer their data into a computer via a Firewire port.
I have three External Drives at the moment (mostly for Video Editing) and all work with either Firewire 400 or 800 (or both). None have a USB 2.0 port.
The new MacBooks don't even have a Firewire port.
The new 15" MacBook Pro has only a port for Firewire 800.
Anyone else have any thoughts on this?
Should I begin shifting my external drives to USB 2.0 connectivity?
Even though USB 2.0's reputation for transferring Video is not very good?
- Ross

Ross Corsair wrote:
I am somewhat baffled as a year ago Firewire was all the rage for Video Editing. It had a better reputation for sustained transfer of data and not dropping frames.
(Critical with video editing).
When importing video from FireWire-based camcorders, the video is sent in real time to the computer, which is why FireWire is necessary. That's because FireWire-based devices use tape to record video (DV or HDV), which cannot be accessed in the same way as memory cards or hard drives (the camcorder can't rewind during capture).
With USB-based camcorders, this is no longer an issue, as the video is stored and transferred as a file, rather than a real-time stream.
Also - the several miniDV cameras I've owned, including my current model, all transfer their data into a computer via a Firewire port.
FireWire-based camcorders won't work with the new MacBooks (you won't be able to import your video without using another computer).
The new 15" MacBook Pro has only a port for Firewire 800.
And an ExpressCard slot, which can be used to add additional FireWire or eSATA ports if necessary.

Is QuickTime Pro being phased out and replaced by new quicktime player ?

Where are scrub bar edit points and what is happening to Pro version since the new Quicktim Player app?

Where are scrub bar edit points and what is happening to Pro version since the new Quicktim Player app?
I haven't seen all that many changes to QT 7 Pro since the introduction of Lion and the default turning off of legacy codecs. Since you use the term "scrub bar," I assume you are referring to the play progress bar and playhead control which can be used for scrubbing content, as well as, the setting of "in" and "out" editing points. As you can see by the image below, the bar and editing pointers are still available and functioning under Mavericks as they have been since the context adaptive change several years/systems ago.
In addition, for those who prefer it, the Jog Shuttle contol is still available in the QT 7 A/V control panel.
As to your original topic question, only Apple knows what its timetable may be for the final phasing out of the QT 7 Player/Pro Player software. And, while it is likely that it will eventually be replaced, I for one, can at least hope that this won't take place until such time as Apple has actually developed viable software with the same editing features and capabilities. However, at this time, QT 7 Pro remains compatible with Apple's choice of a long-term, highly scalable default system video compression format—MPEG-4 AVC. Since the handwriting was effectively "written on the wall" in 2005 when Apple chose to use this format on the iPod Classic 5th Gen mobile device, I began migrating to this format at that time. As a result, I have had little problem in terms of compatibility issues over the years. My only real regret is having to re-compress my files each time Apple increases maximum resolutions, efficiency, or adds options and, with the advent of 4K and Real 3D, expect this trend will continue in the future. But, at least for the present, my files remain dual compatible with both classic QT 7 and new QT X based apps, system features like QL, and all current mobile/remote viewing devices.

Is the Extension Manager really being phased out soon?

I heard from a prominent extension developer that the Adobe Extension Manager is being phased out in favor of the cloud, which I'm assuming means the new add-ons thing. Is this true, and if so, when is this planned for?

It has not been finalized.

Is FireWire being phased out?

I too am disappointed that you can't synch the new iPod with FireWire (though I am told you can still charge the battery this way), since I don't have USB 2.0. Is this a general trend to phasing out Firewire? I would have loved to see a jump up to Firewire 800 on iPods!

Agreed, jeffdc
From the Ars Technica Vid-iPod "Vivisection" (Bottom of the second page)
<code>Most speculation concerning the lack of Firewire support in the new iPods center around the space needed to package the Firewire chipset within the device. Most people who seem to be in the know have said that the amount of board space needed to implement Firewire vastly outweighs a similar USB implementation. Eliminating Firewire altogether seems to have been one of the many tradeoffs Apple had to make to achieve a smaller and lighter device. This may not be much consolation to those users with old USB 1.1 ports, but for many Mac and Windows users, this change shouldn't affect them much.</code>
I think the digital video community would scream if FireWire went away.

Is the W Series being phased out???

I was hoping to replace my aging T61p with a 17” W Series model, but it appears that the W “series” is now down to one model: the W520. Does this suggest that the ThinkPad mobile workstation line is being phased out?
I need a 17” laptop with at least two HDD bays to accommodate 750-1K GB SSD storage (e.g, two 512GB Crucial m4 2.5-inch SATA 6GB/s; http://www.crucial.com/store/partspecs.aspx?IMODULE=CT512M4SSD2).
Should I wait to see if Lenovo releases a W7xxx machine? If not, any thoughts about the new 17” Dell Precision™ M6600 as an alternative to the ThinkPad W Series? (http://www.dell.com/us/en/enterprise/notebooks/precision-m6600/pd.aspx?refid=precision-m6600&s=biz&c...)
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Thanks for the quick reply. I purchased a ThinkPad and a
Dell Precision laptop about the same time. I definitely prefer the build
quality and features of the ThinkPad over the Dell mobile workstation line.
However, for my pro-audio applications (used in live productions), I need well
over 500 GB ultra-fast storage and the fastest mobile processor I can get for
my sample-based instruments; plus as many USB ports as I can get.
Unfortunately, the largest 6Gb/s, 2.5 “ SSD I have found is 512 GB; meaning I
need a machine with at least two HDD slots. So, unless a fast, 1 TB SSD becomes
available, or Lenovo releases a W series model with two HDD slots, I will
likely go with the Dell (faster memory options, more USB ports, etc. compared
with the HP you mentioned).
Thanks again!

Is Flash being phased out for Internet Applications?

I've been working on a conversion of a medium scale app from AS2 to AS3 for the past little while, and I can't help noticing the lack of updates for UI Components for Flash (notably DateChooser and Accordion ). Is this because of:
1. There is a simple way to get those components from Flex builder and all components will be released to Flex first, and need to be rebuilt into flash?
2. Flash is being phased out for web UI Dev and being directed back toward Animation only, leaving Flash UI developers to use Flex?
I fully understand that there is a component community, but I've had mixed luck with them and these two components seem like they should be core components. It seems somewhat telling to me that AS 3 has been out for a really long time now, and the Flash CS5 I bought still doesn't have a calendar component.
Either I'm missing something, or Adobe is telling me that the way I've been using flash is no longer supported and I should look elsewhere for creating Apps.
I really hope I'm missing something obvious but it seems like the idea died with CS3. Can someone clue me in on what's going on?
Thanks in advance!

See if this brings you any joy: http://seeing-is-believing.blogspot.com/2007/11/flex-components-in-flash-example-with.html
Although it does require some work but it is still better than recreating the component which you wanna avoid
Cheers
--Vikas

Phasing out ECC 6.0 Certification

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for