Photo correction: too light and too dark

I have imported ~ 2,000 photos into Lightroom 5.6. The files are PNG format from MS Picture It. Some photos are too light and some are too dark.
I tried synchronizing the metadata thinking this would make the photos more alike. Some are improved, but I still have many that are too light or too dark.
Short of editing each photo, is there an easy way to make the photos more uniform in brightness.
Thanks

Try using Quick Develop in the Library where the adjustments are relative.
For example the inner pair of arrows for highlights or whites adds or subtracts in increments of 5 and the outer arrows in increments of 20. You can see the changes in the history panel by then going into Develop.
So rather than using sync in the Develop module which applies the same absolute setting to every image the changes in quick develop will be relative to the original condition of the photo.
Try experimenting by selecting a batch of thumbnails and applying Quick Develop settings.
Alternatively sort your images into batches using collections where the original lighting is broadly similar. Then select all (Ctrl+A) in each collection and apply the adjustments to each batch, until you get everything broadly similar.

Similar Messages

IPhoto books too light and/or inconsistent???

Hello, Has anyone figured out if the general consensus is that the iphoto books are printing light? An order of 30 medium softcover came out light and also inconsistent from book to book. The hardcover seemed not too light and looked better.
What are others experience, as I would like to try a fix and make all the photos slightly darker and perhaps a bit more saturated....
Any thoughts??
THANKS!

I too have had this problem. I have ordered about 10 large books in the past and the photos were vivid and really looked pretty good. But the ones I received about 2 weeks ago were grainy and the images were really washed out. Funny thing is that I also ordered some single prints of the same pics used in the album and they are gorgeous and clear (very saturated!!). I realize the printing process is different with the books vs. the prints, but this was a tremendous difference. I did email support and they refunded me my $90.00 within 3 days of my email with no questions asked.
I have been reading a lot of these posts with a lot of suggestions for "tweaking" preferences, etc., but I'm convinced that there is a problem with the Apple printing or the software upgrades because I have not changed my equipment - the only thing that has changed is the version of iphoto I'm using. There is no other explanation for having 10 books look great and the newest ones looking so bad! I really like having the books and I hope Apple will resolve this soon.
So as to your question about making the photos slightly darker.........well, you still run the risk of receiving another bad book.
Powerbook Mac OS X (10.3.9)

I have a problem with color prints from photoshop elements 12. The pictures are too light and with strange colors. I have a Canon pixma mg615I0 printer and use mac os X yosemite. The pictures are taken with a coanon eos 550d in the color space sRGB. I hav

Hi
I have a problem with color prints from photoshop elements 12. The pictures are too light and with strange colors. I have a Canon pixma mg615I0 printer and use mac os X yosemite. The pictures are taken with a coanon eos 550d in the color space sRGB. I have followed adobes recommendations and have tried both letting the printer respektive photoshop manage the colors. But nothing works. I see that there are different opinions about which is best to do so I tried both. I have the latest printer driver installed. Can anyone help me with this?

Do the following:
Print a test page from the printer. Perhaps the print head needs cleaning via its maintenance facility.
Let the printer manage colors, not PSE
Calibrate the monitor

Will Blurb correct images that are too light or too dark to print nicely?

I have two calibrated monitors and am submitting a book to Blurb. One monitor is brighter than the other--, that the images look fine on one and too dark on the other. I could changed the brightness, but how do I knwo which is correct for Blurb?what does Blurb see and do they correct images that are all too dark or too light?

Blurb does not correct anything in the uploaded pictures. This is stated clearly on their website; read up under <Color Management>.
It does not matter at all if your image looks fine on the monitor. What matters is if the color numbers of the image are correct. Blurb will print according to the color numbers.
The color numbers of your image will be displayed correctly on the monitor if it is properly calibrated to the industry standard of 6500 K and a gamma 0f 2.2 and if the intensity (brightness) of the monitor is set correctly.
Do this: calibrate both your monitors and set the target value for brightness (intensity) to a value between 100 - 110 cd/m2. This value is considered correct as it will give you prints that match the monitor in brightness.
The best test for checking for how images will look in a blurb book is this: Print the images as sRGB on your own printer. You can do this in two ways:
a) Export the image as JPG in sRGB in the size it will be printed. You can do this from the Book Module, Re-import it into Lr and print from Lr.
b) Don't export the image just print from Lr by selecting <Managed by printer> as the profile and set your printer to sRGB.

Changing the color of hilight it is too light need it darker

my hilighter is too light. I want to darken it on my screen. When I hilight I can't tell if it is hilighted or not.

Go to the Mozilla Add-ons Web Page. There are several add-ons that will change colors for you. You can even make one site have different colors or the same as another site . Also, check out Firefox Options > Content. And select Colors.

Printing correctly in Aperture and too dark in everything else.

New to photography and purchased LightRoom 2 on a friends recommendation. I really like the program. However, no matter what I tried it printed too dark. All sorts of profiles, printer driver color mangement yes/no and while I could get just a slight raise in brightness and color, it was no where near acceptable.
Did a trial on Elements and Aperture. Elements also printed dark which shouldn't be surprising both Adobe.
Last and what proved to be far from least is Aperture. While it may not have the features of the Adobe gear at least it prints right. I can now get a very nice print with my Epson 4880 with one of the built in profiles (as it should be in my opinion).
I understand the need for a proper ICC profile for best results but it seems to me you should at least get a reasonable foundation to work with. I just could not get good color saturation or proper brightness level no matter what I did. From what I read on the net I'm not the only one. Interesting how Adobe must work extremely well with millions of other Macs and PC's but not mine.

I'm no expert in color management
An expert in colour management engineeri can fail in configuring any two ICC-enabled applications for compatible assumptions. Understanding the architecture is one thing and understanding the current conditions for configuration are another.
In such situations as this, the best bet is to ask the Apple ColorSync Users List.
/hh

The ink is too heavy and too wet on the photos.

The printer is an HP PHotosmart C8180. I am using HP advanced photo paper and HP ink. I have cleaned the printhead twice and all ink levels are good. Photos printed two days ago were good. I have the settings on 4x6 boarderless, the paper type HP advanced photo paper. Would really appreciate some help. Thanks

Hello GirlK,
Welcome to the HP Forums.
I see that you are having an issue with the ink being too heavy or still wet on the photos.
Here is a document that deals with the issues you are having as well as a few extra steps. Please click the following link on
Ink Smears or Is Sticky on Printed Photo.
If the troubleshooting does not help resolve your issue, I would then suggest calling HP's Technical Support to see about further options for you. If you are calling within North America, the number is 1-800-474-6836 and for all other regions, click here: click here.
Thanks for your time.
Cheers,
Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" at the bottom of this post to say “Thanks” for helping!
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
W a t e r b o y 71
I work on behalf of HP

Log file is growing too big and too quick on ECC6 EHP4 system

Hello there,
i have ECC6EHP6 system based on NW 7.01 and MSSQL as back-end.
My log file is growing very fast. i seen a number of threads but does not got some perfect idea what to do. Please see DEV_RFC0 and DEV_W0 log file excerpt below. Please help
DEV_RFC0
Trace file opened at 20100618 065308 Eastern Daylight Time, SAP-REL 701,0,14 RFC-VER U 3 1016574 MT-SL
======> CPIC-CALL: 'ThSAPOCMINIT' : cmRc=2 thRc=679
Transaction program not registered
ABAP Programm: SAPLSADC (Transaction: )
User: DDIC (Client: 000)
Destination: SAPDB_DBM_DAEMON (handle: 2, , )
SERVER> RFC Server Session (handle: 1, 59356166, {ADC77ADF-C575-F1CC-B797-0019B9E204CC})
SERVER> Caller host:
SERVER> Caller transaction code: (Caller Program: SAPLSADC)
SERVER> Called function module: DBM_CONNECT_PUR
Error RFCIO_ERROR_SYSERROR in abrfcpic.c : 1501
CPIC-CALL: 'ThSAPOCMINIT' : cmRc=2 thRc=679
Transaction program not registered
DEST =SAPDB_DBM_DAEMON
HOST =%%RFCSERVER%%
PROG =dbmrfc@sapdb
Trace file opened at 20100618 065634 Eastern Daylight Time, SAP-REL 701,0,14 RFC-VER U 3 1016574 MT-SL
======> CPIC-CALL: 'ThSAPOCMINIT' : cmRc=2 thRc=679
Transaction program not registered
ABAP Programm: SAPLSADC (Transaction: )
User: DDIC (Client: 000)
Destination: SAPDB_DBM_DAEMON (handle: 2, , )
SERVER> RFC Server Session (handle: 1, 59587535, {28C87ADF-4577-F16D-B797-0019B9E204CC})
SERVER> Caller host:
SERVER> Caller transaction code: (Caller Program: SAPLSADC)
SERVER> Called function module: DBM_CONNECT_PUR
Error RFCIO_ERROR_SYSERROR in abrfcpic.c : 1501
CPIC-CALL: 'ThSAPOCMINIT' : cmRc=2 thRc=679
Transaction program not registered
DEST =SAPDB_DBM_DAEMON
HOST =%%RFCSERVER%%
PROG =dbmrfc@sapdb
DEV_W0
X
X Fri Jun 18 18:05:15 2010
X *** ERROR => EmActiveData: Invalid Context Handle -1 [emxx.c       2214]
X *** ERROR => EmActiveData: Invalid Context Handle -1 [emxx.c       2214]
N
N Fri Jun 18 18:05:25 2010
N RSEC: The entry with identifier /RFC/DIICLNT800
N was encrypted by a system
N with different SID and cannot be decrypted here.
N RSEC: The entry with identifier /RFC/T90CLNT090
N was encrypted by a system
N with different SID and cannot be decrypted here.
X
X Fri Jun 18 18:05:39 2010
X *** ERROR => EmActiveData: Invalid Context Handle -1 [emxx.c       2214]
X *** ERROR => EmActiveData: Invalid Context Handle -1 [emxx.c       2214]
X
X Fri Jun 18 18:05:46 2010
X *** ERROR => EmActiveData: Invalid Context Handle -1 [emxx.c       2214]
X *** ERROR => EmActiveData: Invalid Context Handle -1 [emxx.c       2214]
X
X Fri Jun 18 18:05:52 2010
X *** ERROR => EmActiveData: Invalid Context Handle -1 [emxx.c       2214]
X *** ERROR => EmActiveData: Invalid Context Handle -1 [emxx.c       2214]
X
N Sun Jun 20 10:55:32 2010
N RSEC: The entry with identifier /RFC/DIICLNT800
N was encrypted by a system
N with different SID and cannot be decrypted here.
N RSEC: The entry with identifier /RFC/T90CLNT090
N was encrypted by a system
N with different SID and cannot be decrypted here.
X
X Sun Jun 20 11:00:02 2010
X *** ERROR => EmActiveData: Invalid Context Handle -1 [emxx.c       2214]
N
N Sun Jun 20 11:00:32 2010
N RSEC: The entry with identifier /RFC/DIICLNT800
N was encrypted by a system
N with different SID and cannot be decrypted here.
N RSEC: The entry with identifier /RFC/T90CLNT090
N was encrypted by a system
N with different SID and cannot be decrypted here.
C
C Sun Jun 20 11:03:34 2010
C Thread ID:1956
C dbmssslib.dll patch info
C    patchlevel   0
C    patchno      13
C    patchcomment Errors when running with par_stmt_prepare set to zero (1253696)
C Local connection used on SAPFIVE to named instance: np:SAPFIVE\ECT
C
C Sun Jun 20 11:03:49 2010
C OpenOledbConnection: line 23839. hr: 0x8000ffff Login timeout expired
C sloledb.cpp [OpenOledbConnection,line 23839]: Error/Message: (err 0, sev 0), Login timeout expired
C Procname: [OpenOledbConnection - no proc]
C sloledb.cpp [OpenOledbConnection,line 23839]: Error/Message: (err -1, sev 0), An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections.
C Procname: [OpenOledbConnection - no proc]
C sloledb.cpp [OpenOledbConnection,line 23839]: Error/Message: (err -1, sev 0), SQL Network Interfaces: Server doesn't support requested protocol [xFFFFFFFF].
C Procname: [OpenOledbConnection - no proc]
C sloledb.cpp [OpenOledbConnection,line 23839]: Error/Message: (err 0, sev 0), Invalid connection string attribute
C Procname: [OpenOledbConnection - no proc]
C
C Sun Jun 20 11:04:04 2010
C OpenOledbConnection: line 23839. hr: 0x8000ffff Login timeout expired
C sloledb.cpp [OpenOledbConnection,line 23839]: Error/Message: (err 0, sev 0), Login timeout expired
C Procname: [OpenOledbConnection - no proc]
C sloledb.cpp [OpenOledbConnection,line 23839]: Error/Message: (err -1, sev 0), An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections.
C Procname: [OpenOledbConnection - no proc]
C sloledb.cpp [OpenOledbConnection,line 23839]: Error/Message: (err -1, sev 0), SQL Network Interfaces: Server doesn't support requested protocol [xFFFFFFFF].
C Procname: [OpenOledbConnection - no proc]
C sloledb.cpp [OpenOledbConnection,line 23839]: Error/Message: (err 0, sev 0), Invalid connection string attribute
C Procname: [OpenOledbConnection - no proc]
C
C Sun Jun 20 11:04:19 2010
C OpenOledbConnection: line 23839. hr: 0x8000ffff Login timeout expired
C sloledb.cpp [OpenOledbConnection,line 23839]: Error/Message: (err 0, sev 0), Login timeout expired
C Procname: [OpenOledbConnection - no proc]
C sloledb.cpp [OpenOledbConnection,line 23839]: Error/Message: (err -1, sev 0), An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections.
C Procname: [OpenOledbConnection - no proc]
C sloledb.cpp [OpenOledbConnection,line 23839]: Error/Message: (err -1, sev 0), SQL Network Interfaces: Server doesn't support requested protocol [xFFFFFFFF].
C Procname: [OpenOledbConnection - no proc]
C sloledb.cpp [OpenOledbConnection,line 23839]: Error/Message: (err 0, sev 0), Invalid connection string attribute
C Procname: [OpenOledbConnection - no proc]
C failed to establish conn to np:SAPFIVE\ECT.
C Retrying without protocol specifier: SAPFIVE\ECT
C Connected to db server : [SAPFIVE\ECT] server_used : [SAPFIVE\ECT], dbname: ECT, dbuser: ect
C pn_id:SAPFIVE_ECT_ECTECT_ECT
B Connection 4 opened (DBSL handle 2)
B Wp Hdl ConName          ConId     ConState     TX PRM RCT TIM MAX OPT Date     Time   DBHost
B 000 000 R/3              000000000 ACTIVE       YES YES NO 000 255 255 20100618 061458 SAPFIVE\ECT
B 000 001 +DBO+0050      000002156 INACTIVE     NO NO NO 004 255 255 20100618 101017 SAPFIVE\ECT
B 000 002 +DBO+0050      000001981 DISCONNECTED NO NO NO 000 255 255 20100620 070023 SAPFIVE\ECT
B 000 003 +DBO+0050      000001982 DISCONNECTED NO NO NO 000 255 255 20100620 070023 SAPFIVE\ECT
B 000 004 R/3*INACT_PACK   000002157 ACTIVE       NO NO NO 004 255 255 20100620 110334 SAPFIVE\ECT
N Sun Jun 20 17:35:35 2010
N RSEC: The entry with identifier /RFC/DIICLNT800
N was encrypted by a system
N with different SID and cannot be decrypted here.
N RSEC: The entry with identifier /RFC/T90CLNT090
N was encrypted by a system
N with different SID and cannot be decrypted here.
M
M Sun Jun 20 17:47:29 2010
M ThAlarmHandler (1)
M ThAlarmHandler (1)
M ThAlarmHandler: set CONTROL_TIMEOUT/DP_CONTROL_JAVA_EXIT and break sql
C
C Sun Jun 20 17:47:33 2010
C SQLBREAK: DBSL_CMD_SQLBREAK: CbOnCancel was not set. rc: 15
M program canceled
M    reason   = max run time exceeded
M    user     = SAPSYS
M    client   = 000
M    terminal =
M    report   = SAPMSSY2
M ThAlarmHandler: return from signal handler
A
A Sun Jun 20 17:48:33 2010
A TH VERBOSE LEVEL FULL
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_PXA_RELEASE_MTX entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_PXA_RELEASE_MTX completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_COVERAGE_ANALYSER entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_COVERAGE_ANALYSER completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_ROLLBACK entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_ROLLBACK completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_DB_ALIVE entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_DB_ALIVE completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_HOOKS entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_HOOKS completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_STANDARD entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_STANDARD completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_STOR_VALUES entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_STOR_VALUES completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_C_STACK entered.
A
A Sun Jun 20 17:48:42 2010
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_C_STACK completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_MEMO_CHECK entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_MEMO_CHECK completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_AFTER_MEMO_CHECK entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_AFTER_MEMO_CHECK completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_INTERFACES entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_INTERFACES completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_GET_MESS entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_GET_MESS completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_INIT_SNAP entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_INIT_SNAP completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_WRITE_SYSLOG entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_WRITE_SYSLOG completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_WRITE_SNAP_BEG entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_WRITE_SNAP_BEG completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_WRITE_SNAP entered.
A
A Sun Jun 20 17:48:48 2010
A ** RABAX: level LEV_SN_END completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_WRITE_SNAP_END entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_WRITE_SNAP_END completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_SET_ALERT entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_SET_ALERT completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_COMMIT entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_COMMIT completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_SNAP_SYSLOG entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_SNAP_SYSLOG completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_RESET_PROGS entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_RESET_PROGS completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_STDERR entered.
A Sun Jun 20 17:48:48 2010
A
A ABAP Program SAPMSSY2                                .
A Source RSBTCTRC                                 Line 131.
A Error Code TIME_OUT.
A Module $Id: //bas/701_REL/src/krn/runt/abinit.c#1 $ SAP.
A Function ab_chstat Line 1941.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_STDERR completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_RFC_ERROR entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_RFC_ERROR completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_RFC_CLOSE entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_RFC_CLOSE completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_IMC_ERROR entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_IMC_ERROR completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_DATASET_CLOSE entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_DATASET_CLOSE completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_RESET_SHMLOCKS entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_RESET_SHMLOCKS completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_ERROR_SAVE entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_ERROR_SAVE completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_ERROR_TPDA entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_ERROR_TPDA completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_PXA_RELEASE_RUDI entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_PXA_RELEASE_RUDI completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_LIVE_CACHE_CLEANUP entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_LIVE_CACHE_CLEANUP completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_END entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_END completed.
A ** RABAX: end no http/smtp
A ** RABAX: end RX_BTCHLOG|RX_VBLOG
A Time limit exceeded..
A
X
X Sun Jun 20 17:49:03 2010
X *** ERROR => EmActiveData: Invalid Context Handle -1 [emxx.c       2214]
N Sun Jun 20 18:35:40 2010
N RSEC: The entry with identifier /RFC/DIICLNT800
N was encrypted by a system
N with different SID and cannot be decrypted here.
N RSEC: The entry with identifier /RFC/T90CLNT090
N was encrypted by a system
N with different SID and cannot be decrypted here.
N
N Sun Jun 20 18:50:35 2010
N RSEC: The entry with identifier /RFC/DIICLNT800
N was encrypted by a system
N with different SID and cannot be decrypted here.
N RSEC: The entry with identifier /RFC/T90CLNT090
N was encrypted by a system
N with different SID and cannot be decrypted here.
N
N Sun Jun 20 18:55:31 2010
N RSEC: The entry with identifier /RFC/DIICLNT800
N was encrypted by a system
N with different SID and cannot be decrypted here.
N RSEC: The entry with identifier /RFC/T90CLNT090
N was encrypted by a system
N with different SID and cannot be decrypted here.
N
N Sun Jun 20 19:00:31 2010
N RSEC: The entry with identifier /RFC/DIICLNT800
N was encrypted by a system
N with different SID and cannot be decrypted here.
N RSEC: The entry with identifier /RFC/T90CLNT090
N was encrypted by a system
N with different SID and cannot be decrypted here.
X
X Sun Jun 20 19:01:59 2010
X *** ERROR => EmActiveData: Invalid Context Handle -1 [emxx.c       2214]
X
X Sun Jun 20 19:02:05 2010
X *** ERROR => EmActiveData: Invalid Context Handle -1 [emxx.c       2214]
M
M Sun Jun 20 19:04:02 2010
M ***LOG R49=> ThReceive, CPIC-Error (020223) [thxxhead.c   7488]
M ***LOG R5A=> ThReceive, CPIC-Error (76495728) [thxxhead.c   7493]
M ***LOG R64=> ThReceive, CPIC-Error ( CMSEND(SAP)) [thxxhead.c   7498]
N
N Sun Jun 20 19:05:31 2010
N RSEC: The entry with identifier /RFC/DIICLNT800
N was encrypted by a system
N with different SID and cannot be decrypted here.
N RSEC: The entry with identifier /RFC/T90CLNT090
N was encrypted by a system
N with different SID and cannot be decrypted here.
Thanks
Mani

i have few BG jobs running at backend, but i dont think that could be a problem. I have these jobs running
ESH_IX_PROCESS_CP_20100621051308
EU_PUT
EU_REORG
RPTMC_CREATE_CHANGEPOINT_AUTH
i cancelled the last one and first job is for trex indexing for changed object i SAP hR master data. middle two i dont know the purpose.
do you think these could be problem?
Mani

Ons.log getting too many and too large

Hi,
Just recently when I tried to connect to our staging database I found that I couldn't connect and it gave me the "disk is full" error. It was quite amazing because the archive logs were not large nor were their any backups on it. And it was a 200g disk partition. After doing some research we found out the the ons logs were the problem. There was probably like 40 or so log files and each was a gig and a half in size. My question is what causes these logs to be created and how can we manage them. Because we have development environment and it was setup exactly the same way as the staging, but we never had a problem like that on it (dev). How can we turn the logging off?
Thank you.

Take a look on thi Metalink Notes
Doc-ID: 284602.1

Console error messages too many and too often

Not sure where to submit this. The messages:
11/14/07 5:34:08 PM com.apple.SystemStarter[28] The process has forked and you cannot use this CoreFoundation functionality safely. You MUST exec().
11/14/07 5:34:08 PM com.apple.SystemStarter[28] Break on _THE_PROCESS_HAS_FORKED_AND_YOU_CANNOT_USE_THIS_COREFOUNDATION_FUNCTIONALITY___Y OU_MUST_EXEC_() to debug.
Keep appearing over and over in the Console logs, about 50 times a second. Any ideas?

Check out this thread: Console error message every few seconds - com.apple.SystemStarter[30]
Hope this helps....

Calendar alert sonud - Too short and too weak

I just bought a new iPhone 4.
I transfered all my appointments.
I am missing my appointments because I do not hear the very short, low sound alert from my iPhone.
What can I do?
Thanks
Ron

Welcome to the discussions,
if your volume settings are set to max and you are using the reminder function prior to your appointment already, there is not much you can do.
Maybe check the App Store for some "To Do" apps which might provide a louder signal.
And, of course, tell Apple that you want a louder alarm sound for your events: http://www.apple.com/feedback/iphone.html

What looks good in Bridge, Lightroom & Safari, looks too light in CS4

When I get things just the way I want them in Lightroom, and export them, when I open them up in Photoshop CS4, they look way too light and even undersaturated. The same image looks the same in Safari, LIghtroom and Bridge, but not CS4. CS4 is set to sRGB and all the images are sRGB images.
Question: why? And what do I need to do so that images look the same in all applications?
I am on a 27" iMac running all the latest software. I have calibrated my monitor and it is set at about 140 cdm2

try exporting from lightroom with AdobeRGB (1998) color space and in photoshop at color settings / working space / rgb choose also AdobeRGB (1998).

Firefox 22 and higher shows fonts too big or too small, sometimes on the same page. How to "fix" this annoying 'improvement"?

Since the update *every* website displays with the fonts too big or too small. On many websites, some of the fonts are too big and some are too small *on the same page*
This makes for a horrible browsing experience.
I've tried setting the layout.css.PixelsPerPx to a value of 1, but all it does is make most websites fonts too small, while leaving some websites fonts too large, with many web pages having fonts simultaneously too large and too small.
The old behavior was quite acceptable and I'd really like to restore the behavior to what it was. How can I do that? Or do i just switch to Chrome and be done with it?

Did you even bother to read the question?
"I've tried setting the layout.css.PixelsPerPx to a value of 1, but all it does is make most websites fonts too small, while leaving some websites fonts too large, with many web pages having fonts simultaneously too large and too small."
This "fix" doesn't work. Hundreds of people are complaining about how their browser was broken by this "improvement". Why not address the real problem instead of telling users to apply a useless hack to fix a programming error?

29.0 is too slow and keeps coming back when using 28.0 Grrrrr!

29.0 was too jerky and too slow. I reinstated 28.0 and it was fine until 29 reinstalled on its own. I have checked about:config and everything everywhere was set to keep it from reverting back but it did anyway. Sorry to sound rude, but what gives? I've been dealing with this since it changed over. We should still be able to choose, right?

Hi Shirley,
If Firefox 29 is going slow, you can try to disable hardware acceleration in Firefox (you need to close and restart Firefox).
*Click the new 3 bar menu > Tools > Options > Advanced > General > Browsing: "Use hardware acceleration when available"
As for the updates, usually changing settings in about:config helps. Are you doing anything to make Firefox do an update such as going to Help > About Firefox? There was a previous way by going through the Options menu to disable updates but after disabling it through there, when you would go to Help > About Firefox, it would update regardless of that setting. There's a few ways to do this although I do all of them to prevent updates just in case one of the updates slip through.
You can set these prefs in <code>about:config</code> to disable automatic updating:<br>
app.update.auto - false<br>
app.update.enabled - false<br>
app.update.silent - false<br>
You can also follow our steps listed in our Knowledge Base
*https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-stop-firefox-automatically-making-connections#w_auto-update-checking
You can set the app.update.url prefs to an empty string on the about:config page to prevent Firefox from checking for updates. (see screenshot below) Just erase everything from those prefs.

My Canon PIXMA MG2120 prints TOO LIGHTLY. How adjust to print DARKER?

My Canon PIXMA MG2120 prints TOO LIGHTLY. How adjust to print DARKER?

That's not really the answer.
The problem is that it will print at the correct saturation/quality only when borderless printing is not used. I purchased this item because I wanted to be able to print full color borderless prints on a full 8.5x11 sheet of paper. I don't want to have to buy special glossy photo paper just to print borderless. Is this the truth of the matter? You cannot print borderless prints on plain paper without sacrificing significant quality? Does it always assume when you set it to borderless, whether youre in the standard print menu or the photo print menu, that you're printing a photo and it will then default to printing lightly? This is outrageous. They should say something about this in the manual.

Photo correction: too light and too dark

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for