Photo ease in - ease out for PE7?

Hello, is PE7 capable of easing in and easing out of photos? I am not refering to fading in but easing in. Meaning the still frame picture is still on screen but it slowly eases in towards the picture or slowly eases away from the picture. Windows Movie Maker has this option and I was hoping PE7 did as well. I have been trying for an hour to figure how to do it on here and I just can't find the answer. Am I wasting my time or does PE7 actually have this option? thank you

And, once you've created the keyframed movement Hunt describes, you can set the speed of this motion to Ease In or Ease Out.
MovieMaker is a very different program than Premiere Elements. It's very simple and very automatic.
Premiere Elements is a much more professional-style program and may require going a little deeper to create effects -- but with many more customizable features and many more professional-style effects available.
If you'd like to know how the program works, have a look at my free Basic Training with Premiere Elements tutorials at Premiere Elements support site http://Muvipix.com.
And, for more advanced understanding of the program, have a look at my books on Amazon.com and at the Muvipix store.
My newest book, "Cool Tricks & Hot Tips for Adobe Premiere Elements" takes you step by step through a number of very cool effects!
http://Muvipix.com/cooltricks

Similar Messages

Photo Stream not updating photos taken while PC out for repair

Hi Everybody,
Odd issue here. I sent my PC out for repair recently. While it was gone, I took a number of photos on my iPhone. The PC came back, and none of the photos are downloading to my PC. The odd part is that any NEW photo that I take IS downloading (I took a picture tonight that downloaded to my PC very quickly). How can I get it to pick up those other photos, and why is it not picking them up?
Thanks!

Bump... any thoughts? I've Googled the crap out of this and just can't come up with any solutions.

Ease in/Ease out is clunky for pan/zooms

I'm using FCP 5 with 10.5.6. When panning and zooming around in a still image (photo), I just can't get an easy landing or stop at the end of the motion, no matter how I adjust the ease in/ease out speed. After choosing Ease in/ Ease out on a keyframe, I shove the little blue speed-control bead toward or away from the keyframe along the motion path, but that distance is limited, and I see very little difference in the result. The motion still stops with a perceptible jerk or clunk.
I have used applications like Photo-to-Movie that have great control on the speed of pans and zooms, and the motion of a pan or zoom starts or stops very gently and almost imperceptibly. Photo-to-Movie costs only $25, so I can't see why an expensive professional program like Final Cut can't do the same thing. I can do smooth pan/zooms in PTM, export the result as a DV clip, and then drop the clip into Final Cut, but I can't adjust the motion within FCP. And working in an outside application to import the results is a real slow-down.
Assuming that the Ease in/Ease out control is all the control you have for smoothing pan/zooms in FCP, and it's inadequate, is there any plug-in for FCP 5 (free or at least inexpensive) that will produce gentle starts and stops?
Tom

Thanks for all the comments everyone, and thank you also Tom Wolsky for your great tutorial books and DVDs that have helped me to gain some competence with Final Cut. I recommend them highly to anyone learning the program.
To shed some light on the purpose of my original post, the project I'm working on contains both video footage and still images. In this video I'm demonstrating how to paint pictures, while using still images of historic paintings as examples of how the old-time painters did things, compared to what I'm doing now.
So in this video I alternate from live demonstrations of painting, to still images of old paintings, slowly panning and zooming around the old paintings and stopping to analyze portions of them.
I find that there is something comfortable and soothing about good pan/zooms as compared to the unsettling feelings and irritation caused by watching jerky starts and stops, with unnatural acceleration and deceleration between.
You have all made it clear to me (thanks again) that it is a matter of the mathematics involved in Final Cut's treatment of pan/zooms that makes it hard to get smooth movements of that type in FC. I still think it's odd that I can get wonderful pan/zooms from a cheapie little program like Photo-to-Movie but not a pro application like Final Cut, but at least PTM can get the job done for me, although it is a slowdown to have to use it. I first have to create the pan/zooms on still images in PTM and then export them as DV clips to drop into Final Cut. If a pan/zoom then needs adjustment, I have to throw the clip away, go back to PTM and modify the movement, and then export a fresh clip. Very slow.
By the way, I visited the Photo to Movie website, which I haven't done for a long time, and I see that the price of the program has now doubled to $50. The authors have apparently gotten big ideas and have added transitions, titles, and other kinds of editing besides just movement. On their demo webpage <http://tinyurl.com/yfej3j4> you can see sample pans and zooms created by the program. The third sample movie down from the top, with the zebras, shows some of the types of motion I'm after, such as the scene that zooms gently in on the turtle's head or the dog near the end of that movie. Note how smooth the starts/stops are.
In my own YouTube movie <http://tinyurl.com/yh8hl38>, which I created in Final Cut in 2008, the paintings that leap out at you with music at the beginning were also created in Photo to Movie and dropped into Final Cut. In that case the motion is almost violent, and no doubt I could have done it just as easily in Final Cut, but at that time I was new to keyframing in Final Cut and had gotten so accustomed to the ease of doing such things in PTM that I used it for that too. A few minutes further along in that video you can see the kind of gentle pan/zooming by PTM that I'm trying to create again now in a new video. My failed attempts to do it in Final Cut a couple days ago are what led me to ask for help here.
Maybe if I can gain a better grasp of Motion 2 I could do better with it than my first attempt yesterday, and I could also also round-trip between Motion and Final Cut to quickly adjust the movements, but I just don't know the program well enough yet to do that. I'll search for tutorials and demo movies on Motion. Someone above has also said that Motion 2 is inferior to version 3 in this respect, and I don't have 3, so I guess I'm stuck with Photo to Movie for the present to get smooth pan/zooms.
Thanks again everyone for all the enlightenment on this subject.
Tom B.

Does PS CC have "ease in" and "ease out" feature for motion?

I'm trying to learn about the video timeline in CC and expect to see an "ease in" and "ease out" feature? Is it hidden somewhere?
Where can I find some in-depth tutorials on video animation in Photoshop CC?
Thanks,
Ray

I don't do video however I would think for video to do something like that. You may need a real video editor like Adobe Premiere Pro and After effects to add an effect like that.. To simulate slow motion frame would need to be added and if there is audio some gaps may need to be added. Photoshop only support basic video editing some transforming and filters. trimming and joining with transitions.
With a Frame animation you can display frames at different rates or durations. Perhaps you could create a frame animation with the effect you want then convert that to video timeline and add an audio track. I have not tried to do anything like that. It should be possible for I have converted a frame animation to a video timeline and rendered a video.
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/aftereffects/cs/using/WS3878526689cb91655866c1103906c6dea-7d58 a.html

Keyboard shortcut for "Ease in" and "Ease out"?

Just wondering if there's a way to map keys for ease in/ease out instead of right clicking keyframes and navigating there.
Thanks.
(Premiere CS3)

I use Ease-In/Out dissolves hundreds of times per project, week in and week out. I've made a simple preset for it. One for Fading in and one for fading out. Drag and drop anywhere on the clip and it snaps to the start and end of the clip as you need it. It's not a keyboard shortcut which would certainly be nice, but it was easier than manually doing it hundreds of times.
One thing I don't like is that I sometimes click on the Preset accidentally and then hit a keyboard button and it's suddenly changed the Preset name to the keyboard key that I hit (usually the space bar) because when you click on a preset twice you can change it's name. I know that sounds dumb and petty, but it happens to my assistant editors every so often as well since they too have to use these dissolves a ton. I wish the only way to rename Presets was by right-clicking on it and having a "rename" selection to prevent the issue I described. It's the little things that sometimes make a big difference so I think I'll submit a FR. Followers welcome.

Ease in/out for a scaling image?

I have an image with a keyframe on the first frame and one on the last, and I have the image scaling up on the last frame. I'm not happy with how CS6 is scaling the image up, I would like to have it do it smoother. I right click on the last keyframe and choose both Ease in and also try Ease out, though I am not seeing much difference. Which option should I be using, and are there any other options I should look into?
Thanks.

As others have stated, one can adjust the Interpolation of the Keyframes. Initially, all Keyframes will be Linear, and often, some form of Bezier Interpolation is preferable. The Ease Out (first Keyframe), and Ease In (last Keyframe) are really just Presets, and will do a "smoother" job with the Interpolation. As Steven points out, one has more options, and one of those, say Auto Bezier, might be better, and also offer the user more control - it just depends on what one wants. PrPro offers a great deal of control with regards to Keyframe Interpolation.
Good luck,
Hunt

How Can You Disable Ease-In and Ease-Out Of Ken Burns

It seems that along with everything else that has changed with iMovie version 10, when you add photos to the timeline it automatically places an ease-in and ease-out to the Ken Burns move. For those of you who have been on a Mac for a while, this was how iMovie behaved in version 6 and earlier, and it feels rather dated.
If you are putting together a video slide show with multiple photos back to back, having the zoom ease in and out for every image is incredibly obnoxious. I can see situations when you are providing a narrative that it might be important, but often photos are just being animated to music. Is there a way to disable the easing or am I just best keeping to iMovie 9.0.9?
Thanks!

Hi Douglas,
Thanks for visiting Apple Support Communities.
It does look like this is the default behavior for imported pictures in iMovie 10, and can't be disabled from the iMovie preferences. The best workaround is to select all of the pictures in your timeline and turn off the Ken Burns effect using the Adjust menu.
iMovie Help
http://help.apple.com/imovie/mac/10.0/#mov26d3f6a6c
Modify a crop, rotation, or Ken Burns effect
In the timeline, select the photos you want to modify or restore to their original state.
Click the Adjust button in the toolbar.
The adjustments bar appears above the clip in the viewer.
To show the cropping controls, click the Cropping button.
In the cropping controls, change Style from Ken Burns to Fit to display the pictures in their original size. From there, you can crop them individually as needed.
Best,
Jeremy

Help With Ease In/Ease Out / Smooth Motion

I'm in the process of completing a historical documentary and have run into a problem. The project calls for a LOT of photos. And, as usual, most of the pix have different types of moves attached to them. I'm trying to get the moves to start and stop on the photos with an "ease in" and/or "ease out" effect. Normally, I'd do this in AE, but due to time constraints (not to mention the volume of pix), I'd rather get the gist of it down in FCP.
I've tried both the "Ease In/Ease Out" and "Smooth" keyframe commands. Smooth seems to work best. If there's a center position change during the move however, the photo appears to slightly "float" up and down during the duration of the move - especially when starting and stopping. Problem is, I don't want it to float... I just want it to move smoothly from point A to point B.
Is there a way to gradually start and then gradually stop movement on an object (such as a photo), without having this floating effect?
Thanks.
Tim Walton
Dual 2.0ghz G-5 Mac OS X (10.4.4) FCP 5.1.1 (Studio)

Normally, I'd do this in AE, but due to time constraints (not to mention the volume of pix), I'd rather get the gist of it down in FCP.< </div>
You will like neither the animation process nor the results in FCP.
There is simple coverage of eases in the FCP manual, you will want to find that section and put a stickie on it. Beware that FCP's native DV rendering for motion blows. You will need to add some blur but not motion blur. FCPS's motion blur is nothing like AE's motion blur. It's awful.
The problems you will have are going to drive you nuts. The keyframes and Beziers in FCP are skittish and spazzy, nothing like the smooth and elegant controls that have always been available in AE. It's like Apple decided to reinvent the entire Bezier handling system and they forgot to finish the job.
I suggest you stick to AE for this work but that's just me. Figure out how to make FCP's motion madness work later when you have more time to mess with it.
bogiesan

Ease in/ease out motion panning keyframes

this seems to be very difficult to accomplish. does anyone have a method to do this sucessfully
take photo and pan it from left to right, or up and down, it starts at slow and smooth gets moving (not too fast) and slows down to a beautiful stop at end. i understand you make the move with keyframes and then go to your canvas window and ctrl click to choose "ease in/ease out" - now i would think it would just make a bezier automation like it does with "smooth" for scaling, but it doesnt, it makes the picture bounce or it makes it speed up crazy and stop ubruptly, then i notice you have to grab this second green dot to adjust the velocity but even that doesnt work smoothly either, has anyone mastered this?
fcp5
thanks
adam

Adam,
The best way I've found to work with the Bezier keyframes is to temporarily enlarge the Canvas window in order to see what I'm doing (100% to 200%). With the Canvas window in Image+Wireframe mode, once you've set the Center keyframes you should see the green motion path. When you add the "ease In/Ease Out" you should see the purple Bezier handles overlayed on the green motion path. Notice the two larger purple dots on each Bezier handle; changing the position of the larger purple dots will change the behavior of the easing move.
It will take a little practice and experimentation, but you should be able to learn the relationships between the dot positioning and motion behavior fairly quickly.
-DH

Is it possible to have a hover effect easing out on multiple images when hovering on others?

Im trying to use four small images to create a large image by using a hover effect. However when i hover over an image for instance 3 of 4, after hovering over 1 and 2, number 1's ease-out effects snaps back to the background image, rather than continuing to ease-out. Which i do not want. Is it possible to have numerous ease-out effects working at the same time? Using CSS.

Could you show us a bit more of what you've done so far?
I'm not sure I understand the desired result.
Can you put your files online somwhere?
Thanks

"ease in - ease out" in new FCP 7??

I heard that the new FCP 7 allows us to get REAL ease-in\ease-out when creating moves on stills. I just made a couple of quick tests ... and I'm not noticing any great change in the subtlety of easing, or lack thereof, from previous versions of FCP. I'm working on a film with hundreds of stills, requiring endless camera\animation moves. I've been sending the sequences to Motion to get decent easing in and out; I was hoping the new FCP would make this unnecessary (based on the rumors I've heard).
Or perhaps it requires a different process when adding the ease-in\ease-out to the moves?
Ben

Hi -
I agree with David's post that it would probably be preferable to work in Motion or AE (or my favorite, Boris Red) - not only for the ease of creating the motion effects, but for what seems to be the better physical dynamics that those applications seem to have.
But . . . if you have to work in FCP, a couple of tricks I have learned in FCP when apply spline motion is:
1) Bracket the motion keyframes by putting a non-splined keyframe with the same position settings one frame before the real starting keyframe and one frame after the real ending keyframe. This helps prevent some of the "erratic" behavior.
2) To better see the mauve points, I enlarge the canvas to 400% or 800% and set the canvas view to wireframe only. I have a window arrangement saved that lets me quickly get the screen set up to make these adjustments.
But, as David and you point out, clearly the best way is to switch to Motion, AE or Boris Red.
Good luck!

Ease-in ease-out weirdness in motion tab FCP

I've been doing a lot of animating stills in FCP by keyframing SCALE and CENTRE in the MOTION TAB of the VIEWER. I discovered the EASE-IN and EASE-OUT options by control-clicking the end key frames, but when I play back the animated clip, it does these weird lateral curve motions despite my only animating the still in a straight line. How do you ease-in a still and ease-out without this weird motion action occurring? Anyone sorted that? Do I have to use *After Effects* or Motion, or can it be done well in FCP ?

Try moving the image with Anchor Point instead. Some time ago, Tom Wolsky posted the following reply to a thread that is long-gone:
+Let's say you're zooming into a picture. You're starting say a scale of 20% centered on the screen and you going to scale up to 100%, and as you zoom in (scale) you want to move to the upper right corner of the image. Scaling takes place around the anchor point. The anchor point is normally the center of the image. As you move toward the upper right you're actually scaling around a point that's moving farther and farther away from where you're going. This causes overshoot, especially if the scale and center values are eased. (Scaling is not exponential anyway so this exacerbates the problem.) If you animate the anchor point to move opposite the center point, the scaling will continue to happen around the anchor point, which is now moving with you toward where you're going. It'll give you a bit better motion, but you still have to give yourself a little wiggle room.+
+Let me give you some numbers. I'm starting with an image that's 3600x2670. At it's start the image is centered and scaled to 24%. I can't go all the way to 20% because I'll get overshoot on the start when I put on easing because scale is logarithmic, while center is arithmetic. At the end of the motion the image is scaled to 100. It's center is now -1335, 932. (Again because of overshoot I can't go much closer to the edge.) Easing is set for center and scale, and as I'm sure you've seen you get the image sliding off the screen even with leaving the slack that I did. Now add the anchor point animation. Set the start keyframe at 0,0 the same as the center point. Set the end keyframe to 1335, -932, the opposite of the center keyframe and you'll get a motion that stays in the screen. If you could set easing for the anchor point it would be even smoother, but that's not practical in the FCP interface. You get a little snaking effect at the end. All in all pretty inadequate for good motion control.+
+I tried it Motion as well. The first problem is the application can't handle the image at full resolution. It could do the movement with scale animation and a motion path behavior. It was kind of adequate, but easing on the scaling was pretty poor and didn't achieve good results.+
+A major issue in both applications is the the scaling starts quickly and gets slower and slower. This is because of the lack of exponential scaling, and until this is addressed neither application will be more than barely adequate at best when it comes to large scale motion control. Basically neither of them are acceptable for professional work on large format, large scale images. I won't even go into how totally inadequate FCP is for easing stop and go motion.+

Photoshop Animation Ease In/Ease Out

I can't seem to find any way to do a tween with an ease in/ease out in the animation panel of Photoshop. Is there any way to do this? And could it be made a feature?

Yes, I remember wishing for this feature years ago. Although I haven't explored these features in years, I think its true to say that tweening in Photoshop doesn't support ease-in and ease-out. Which would provide smoother more natural animated transitions.
The Animation features on Photoshop were imported from ImageReady, a really good, and cleverly put together application. Now discontinued.

Remove keyframe Ease in/Ease out

Recently I was working on a proect where I wanted to have large text in the background (lower opacity) scrolling behind the smaller main text. I was using keyframes to control the motion of the text but noticed that it had a built in ease in/ease out feature. While this is normally great, is there a way to disable this to allow for a constant and smooth scroll (in this case L to R)?
I just want the object to travel along the motion path with the keyframes at the rate I specify so I don't get a slow-fast-slow look to the text. Thanks for any help.
Mac Book Pro Mac OS X (10.4.8)

set your keyframes where you want them at the beginning/end of the clip so the text moves how you want it to. then in the timeline select keyframe editor, and select the keyframes that are related to the motion of the text (L to R across the screen would be the Transform.Position.X keyframes). once they are selected, right-click/opt-click on the keyframe, select interpolation, then select linear.
that'll do it
-gardner

Ease In/ Ease Out

I figured out how to get this going yesterday. Now I have a large art file, 3/4 of it is out of the frame. I am moving it only a small distance and want to be using Ease In /Ease Out, but the sider bar is so small and so far out into the grey area of the canvas I can get to it and work it easily unless I zoom out to 25% and that's usless. Any way to zoom in or out of the grey area?
~Mark

I think he means that because the image is so large and that he's so close on it, the edge is out of frame so that he can't reach the controls for ease in/ease out unless he sets the size to 25% (thus showing the gray out of frame area). At that point though, the controls are so small, he can't make accurate adjustments.
Is that what you mean, Mark?
Tried to help make it clearer. Sorry I don't have any suggestions!
Cameron

Photo ease in - ease out for PE7?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for