Photo looks different when decreasing exposure with adj. brush & when decreasing exp. on whole photo

I want to darken the overexposed sky in a photo. I reduced the exposure ( - 4 EV) of the whole photo to see how the sky would look. It looked great. Deep blue sky with white clouds with light gray areas. Then I reset the exposure & painted the sky with the adjustment brush set to Exposure - 4 EV. The sky looked terrible. Clouds were dark grayish black in some areas. I increased the exposure to - 3 EV & then - 2.5 EV & it looked less terrible but not good. Why is there such a difference in the way the sky looks when changing the exposure of the whole photo & changing it with the adjustment brush. Thanks!

It is a known issue with how the adjustment brush works in exposure
compensation mode. Hopefully it will be fixed in the future.
I want to darken the overexposed sky in a photo. I reduced the exposure ( - 4
EV) of the whole photo to see how the sky would look. It looked great. Deep
blue sky with white clouds with light gray areas. Then I reset the exposure &
painted the sky with the adjustment brush set to Exposure - 4 EV. The sky
looked terrible. Clouds were dark grayish black in some areas. I increased the
exposure to - 3 EV & then - 2.5 EV & it looked less terrible but not good. Why
is there such a difference in the way the sky looks when changing the exposure
of the whole photo & changing it with the adjustment brush. Thanks!

Similar Messages

  • In FF4, why does my website looks different when www is omitted

    ''locking as a duplicate - https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/questions/814715''
    My site looks different when I use www in the address and when I omit www. Look at http://www.dynapipe.co.uk and http://dynapipe.co.uk.
    This doesn't happen with FF3 or IE7, 8 or 9 or Google Chrome, only FF4

    Oops, responded to a duplicate of your post over here: https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/questions/814715

  • When i open .jpg picture in photoshop on MAC the the background thumbnail in the layers panel looks like a white box with the brush inside instead of picture thumbnail. how to fix it?

    when i open .jpg picture in photoshop on MAC the the background thumbnail in the layers panel looks like a white box with the brush inside instead of picture thumbnail. how to fix it?

    Very easy. That means you have a "no layer thumbnails" option selected.
    Go into the Layers Panel menu at the upper right of the Panel, choose Panel Options and you will see Thumbnail sizes to choose from.
    Select one, click OK.
    Gene

  • Photos in Develop module look different when switching to library module

    Hello everyone this is my first post on adobe.  I ran into a problem today for the first time using lightroom 5.  I recently purchased lightroom 5 about 2 weeks ago and have been in love using it.  I have ran into 0 problems until today.  I uploaded some new photos and was going through them under the develop module editing the photos and what not.  When I am done editing I usually go to the library module and export them.
    Today I tried to do that exact thing and ran into this issue:  the colors in the photo are changing ever so slightly when I switch to the library module and are not exporting exactly as I edited them in the develop module. 
    I have tried changing the contrast/clarity to see if it would remain when switching and it does.  But for some reason the yellow on the flower in the picture becomes less vibrant when seen/exported from library module.  It is very frustrating because I spend alot of time editing the photo in a develop module and every transfers but the colors it seems.  It becomes more dull and less vibrant.
    It is not the photo itself.  I think it is something wrong with my lightroom?  I uninstalled and reinstalled and the same issue keeps happening.

    Just to clarify. When you compare the exported image to the original inside LR do they look the same when viewed together in the Library module, and how about when both are viewed in the Develop module? Are you using a wide gamut monitor and do you also use a hardware monitor calibrator? All of these things affect how images looks in LR and some are fixable, but others are not as Web Weaver posted.
    There is also another issue that can cause the Library module view and exported images to look different than they do in the Develop module:
    http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/afm8rbh6tnc31
    The solution is to view the image at 1:1 (100%) view size. You can also use more conservative Sharpening settings (i.e. lower) and more aggressive Luminance Noise Reduction settings (i.e. higher), which will significantly decrease the view difference.

  • Why do my raws look different when I view them in Adobe Bridge/Adobe Camera Raw and Canons Digital P

    Hello all,
    I am sorta new to taking Raw photographs and I have been been using Adobe Bridge/Camera Raw to edit. When I take my photos (I am using a Canon t2i) I have it set to save a raw and a jpg. When I view these images in Adobe Bridge/Camera Raw I notice a clear difference in the jpg and raw (I understand the whole concept behind raw vs. jpg. so im not questioning why one looks different) It is obvious all the adjustments that were applied to my jpg. vs the natural raw.  My question is: When I view the same two images in the software that came with my camera, canon digital photo professionals, the canon and raw look almost identical.... My assumption is that canon is applying the same "adjustments" to my raw as it did to the jpgs?  Has anyone used these two programs and noticed this?
    Thank you in advance for your assistance.
    Michelle

    Can't say I'm an expert on DPP myself either.  I've only run it a few times myself.
    If you're seeing Photoshop freeze just by looking at the File Info tab, that's certainly not expected and you should start a tread specifically to discuss that.  The forum may be able to help you get that working.
    I happen to like the color my camera delivers in its embedded JPEGs (which I use to quickly review shots via IrfanView).  Starting with that color in Camera Raw by default just feels very natural and integrated.
    Without a specific custom profile to help you with the task, here's my suggestions for the next best thing:
    1.  Take an image with a range of different colors in it.
    2.  Open the embedded JPEG also using whatever means you have to do so.
    3.  Open it also in Camera Raw and make sure you're using the Camera Raw default parameters.
    4.  Go into the Camera Calibration tab (little camera icon), and choose the Camera Standard profile as provided by Adobe.
    5.  Tweak the various sliders so as to match the color between what you're seeing in the JPEG and Camera Raw.
    6.  Save new Camera Raw defaults.
    Some notes:
    Make sure you leave the White Balance on As Shot, since storing a specific white balance is probably not going to be helpful.
    Test your settings and repeat the above to tweak them as needed using other images.
    Keep in mind that not every application does proper color-management.  IrfanView can be set up to do so, and I don't recall whether you have to tweak a default setting to make it do that or not (it's been a while).
    Hope this helps!
    -Noel

  • SCREENS LOOK DIFFERENT WHEN Accesing GUI through IE

    Hi Gurus,
    I am new to ITS MOBILE, and i have a situation now.
    When i am trying to acess the GUI based applications, one screen looks different from the other, i mean when i go LM01 and go to INBOUND process, the screen there looks WEB based,but when i go to a different screen from the dynamic menu, the screen looks different there GUI based.
    I am wondering is it something to do with the STYLE???,/am i missing something???, can anyone please explain how do you make the screens lokk alike???, imean either WEB based/GUI based??
    Your inputs are highly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Srik

    with the full hostname on url it works ok.

  • Exported pictures look different when uploaded to websites.

    I noticed that exported pictures from Lightroom  uploaded to Facebook or Shutterfly look different that when viewing the same exported pictures on my pc. Why is that?  The exported pictures were not adjusted, maybe only cropped and red eyes were removed. Yet the colors appear different when viewing the same pictures on Facebook or in Shutterfly.  If I upload exact the same picture directly from my picture folder, the colors look different. I wonder why this is happening.

    Export as sRGB will always help; however most browsers are not colour managed so the colour reproduction can vary anyway even when using sRGB. Only Safari is fully managed, Firefox works up to a point (it only uses icc v2 profiles, not v4 it will be OK with LR as LR presently exports to the v2 version of sRGB) or browsers don't honour profiles at all. Calibrating your monitor is also an important factor here and a hardwear device is required to do this correctly.
    How an image looks in non colour managed applications cannot be a basis for jusdging an image so only fully colour managed applications (such as LR or PS) should ever be used for processing.

  • Colours look different in Elements compared with Photoshop Album

    Hello All,
    I have a bit of a problem with Elements 5.0. When I import a RAW file and save to jpeg (at the maximum image quality selection) I have the image exactly as I want it. However if I then double click the image from the folder where it is stored it opens in Photoshop Starter Edition 3.0 and the colours of the image are much warmer with skin tones appearing more pink.
    If I then open the same image back in Elements it appears all ok.
    Has anyone else had this issue whereby Elements displays an image differently to other programs?
    Help!!
    Grant

    UPDATE: When I use column view in Finder the Preview looks correct. But the thumbnail when in thumbnail view looks incorrect....

  • Looks different when previewing in browser. Help?

    <!DOCTYPE
    html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
    <html
    xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><!--
    InstanceBegin template="/Templates/UA.dwt" codeOutsideHTMLIsLocked="false"
    -->
    <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
    charset=utf-8" />
    <title>Untitled
    Document</title>
    <style type="text/css">
    <!--
    body
    font: 100%/1.4 Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
    margin:
    0;
    padding: 0;
    color: #000;
    background-color:
    #000;
    background-image:
    url(Logos_for_Ultra_Aircare_central_vacuum/Ultraaircare%20background.jpg);
    /* ~~
    Element/tag selectors ~~ */
    ul, ol, dl { /* Due to variations between
    browsers, it's best practices to zero padding and margin on lists. For
    consistency, you can either specify the amounts you want here, or on the list
    items (LI, DT, DD) they contain. Remember that what you do here will cascade to
    the .nav list unless you write a more specific selector. */
    padding:
    0;
    margin: 0;
    h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, p {
    margin-top: 0;  /*
    removing the top margin gets around an issue where margins can escape from their
    containing div. The remaining bottom margin will hold it away from any elements
    that follow. */
    padding-right: 15px;
    padding-left: 15px; /* adding the
    padding to the sides of the elements within the divs, instead of the divs
    themselves, gets rid of any box model math. A nested div with side padding can
    also be used as an alternate method. */
    a img { /* this selector removes
    the default blue border displayed in some browsers around an image when it is
    surrounded by a link */
    border: none;
    /* ~~
    Styling for your site's links must remain in this order - including the group of
    selectors that create the hover effect. ~~ */
    a:link
    color:#414958;
    text-decoration: underline; /* unless you style your
    links to look extremely unique, it's best to provide underlines for quick visual
    identification */
    a:visited {
    color: #4E5869;
    text-decoration:
    underline;
    a:hover, a:active, a:focus { /* this group of selectors will
    give a keyboard navigator the same hover experience as the person using a mouse.
    text-decoration: none;
    /* ~~
    this container surrounds all other divs giving them their percentage-based width
    ~~ */
    .container {
    width: 80%;
    max-width: 1260px;/* a max-width may be
    desirable to keep this layout from getting too wide on a large monitor. This
    keeps line length more readable. IE6 does not respect this declaration.
    min-width: 902px;/* a min-width may be desirable to keep this layout from
    getting too narrow. This keeps line length more readable in the side columns.
    IE6 does not respect this declaration. */
    background: #FFF;
    margin: 0
    auto; /* the auto value on the sides, coupled with the width, centers the
    layout. It is not needed if you set the .container's width to 100%. */
    /* ~~
    the header is not given a width. It will extend the full width of your layout.
    It contains an image placeholder that should be replaced with your own linked
    logo ~~ */
    .header {
    background-color: #051852;
    /* ~~
    These are the columns for the layout. ~~
    1)
    Padding is only placed on the top and/or bottom of the divs. The elements within
    these divs have padding on their sides. This saves you from any "box model
    math". Keep in mind, if you add any side padding or border to the div itself, it
    will be added to the width you define to create the *total* width. You may also
    choose to remove the padding on the element in the div and place a second div
    within it with no width and the padding necessary for your design.
    2) No
    margin has been given to the columns since they are all floated. If you must add
    margin, avoid placing it on the side you're floating toward (for example: a
    right margin on a div set to float right). Many times, padding can be used
    instead. For divs where this rule must be broken, you should add a
    "display:inline" declaration to the div's rule to tame a bug where some versions
    of Internet Explorer double the margin.
    3)
    Since classes can be used multiple times in a document (and an element can also
    have multiple classes applied), the columns have been assigned class names
    instead of IDs. For example, two sidebar divs could be stacked if necessary.
    These can very easily be changed to IDs if that's your preference, as long as
    you'll only be using them once per document.
    4) If
    you prefer your nav on the right instead of the left, simply float these columns
    the opposite direction (all right instead of all left) and they'll render in
    reverse order. There's no need to move the divs around in the HTML source.
    .sidebar1
    float: left;
    width: 20%;
    padding-bottom: 10px;
    background-color:
    #041237;
    .content {
    padding: 10px 0;
    width: 80%;
    float:
    left;
    font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
    font-size: 11px;
    /* ~~
    This grouped selector gives the lists in the .content area space ~~
    .content ul, .content ol {
    padding: 0 15px 15px 40px; /* this padding
    mirrors the right padding in the headings and paragraph rule above. Padding was
    placed on the bottom for space between other elements on the lists and on the
    left to create the indention. These may be adjusted as you wish. */
    /* ~~
    The navigation list styles (can be removed if you choose to use a premade flyout
    menu like Spry) ~~ */
    ul.nav {
    list-style: none; /* this removes the list
    marker */
    border-top: 1px solid #666; /* this creates the top border for the
    links - all others are placed using a bottom border on the LI
    margin-bottom: 15px; /* this creates the space between the navigation on
    the content below */
    ul.nav li {
    border-bottom: 1px solid #666; /*
    this creates the button separation */
    ul.nav a, ul.nav a:visited { /*
    grouping these selectors makes sure that your links retain their button look
    even after being visited */
    padding: 5px 5px 5px 15px;
    display: block; /*
    this gives the link block properties causing it to fill the whole LI containing
    it. This causes the entire area to react to a mouse click.
    text-decoration: none;
    background: #8090AB;
    color:
    #000;
    ul.nav a:hover, ul.nav a:active, ul.nav a:focus { /* this changes
    the background and text color for both mouse and keyboard navigators
    background: #6F7D94;
    color: #FFF;
    /* ~~
    The footer ~~ */
    .footer {
    position: relative;/* this gives IE6 hasLayout
    to properly clear */
    clear: both;
    background-color: #041237;
    color:
    #FFF;
    font-weight: 100;
    font-variant: normal;
    text-transform:
    none;
    font-style: normal;
    font-size: 10px;
    font-family: Arial,
    Helvetica, sans-serif;
    height: 30px;
    width: 902px;
    padding-top:
    10px;
    padding-right: 0;
    padding-bottom: 10px;
    padding-left: 0;
    /* ~~
    miscellaneous float/clear classes ~~ */
    .fltrt {  /* this class can be used
    to float an element right in your page. The floated element must precede the
    element it should be next to on the page. */
    float: right;
    margin-left:
    8px;
    .fltlft { /* this class can be used to float an element left in
    your page. The floated element must precede the element it should be next to on
    the page. */
    float: left;
    margin-right: 8px;
    .clearfloat { /* this
    class can be placed on a <br /> or empty div as the final element
    following the last floated div (within the #container) if the #footer is removed
    or taken out of the #container */
    clear:both;
    height:0;
    font-size:
    1px;
    line-height: 0px;
    -->
    </style><!--[if lte IE
    7]>
    <style>
    .content { margin-right: -1px; } /* this 1px negative
    margin can be placed on any of the columns in this layout with the same
    corrective effect. */
    ul.nav a { zoom: 1; }  /* the zoom property gives IE
    the hasLayout trigger it needs to correct extra whiltespace between the links
    </style>
    <![endif]--></head>
    <body>
    <div
    class="container">
      <div class="header"><!-- end .header
    --><!-- InstanceBeginEditable name="header" --><img
    src="Templates/warranty_sticker_2004.jpg" width="902" height="302" /><!--
    InstanceEndEditable --></div>
      <!-- InstanceBeginEditable
    name="links" -->
      <div class="sidebar1">
        <ul
    class="nav">
          <li><img src="links/home.jpg" width="181"
    height="44" /></li>
          <li><img
    src="links/ultraaircare.jpg" width="181" height="44" /></li>
    <li><img src="links/pricing.jpg" width="181" height="44"
    /></li>
          <li><img src="links/allergiesandasthma.jpg"
    width="181" height="44" /></li>
          <li></li>
    <img src="links/contact us.jpg" width="181" height="44" />
    </ul>
        <p> </p>
    <p> </p>
        <p> </p>
    <p> </p>
        <!-- end .sidebar1 -->
    </div>
      <!-- InstanceEndEditable --><!--
    InstanceBeginEditable name="content" -->
      <div
    class="content">
        <h1>Instructions</h1>
        <p>Be
    aware that the CSS frfjfyukuhjiklui9liol;ko;i90or these layouts is heavily
    commented. If you do most of your work in Design view, have a peek at the code
    to get tips on working with the CSS for the liquid layouts. You can remove these
    comments before you launch your site. To learn more about the techniques used in
    these CSS Layouts, read this article at Adobe's Developer Center - <a
    href="http://www.adobe.com/go/adc_css_layouts">http://www.adobe.com/go/adc_css_layouts</a>.</p>
    <h2> </h2>
        <p> </p>
    <p> </p>
        <p> </p>
    <!-- end .content -->
      </div>
      <!-- InstanceEndEditable
    --><!-- InstanceBeginEditable name="footer" -->
      <div
    class="footer">
        <p>Copyright UltraAircare
          <!-- end
    .footer -->
        </p>
      </div>
      <!--
    InstanceEndEditable --><!-- end .container
    --></div>
    </body>
    <!-- InstanceEnd
    --></html>
    So I just started a website for a project that I have to do. So far everything has been going well. Everything shows up perfect in liveview in Dreamweaver CS5, but now that I'm previewing it in internet explorer, this is how it shows up. Help anyone? Any ideas?

    Link please.
    Bob

  • How come that the design mode looks different than preview mode with slideshows?

    hello,
    I am placing a slideshow on the site. when I look in the preview mode the slideshow is not exactly in the same place.
    How come? Am I doing somthing wrong?
    thanks for response

    Welcome to the medium that is the web. Every browser has it's own text layout engine and "web-safe" fonts are a misnomer. You cannot rely on text line breaking the same in different browsers. Thus creating text frames that snuggly fit the text within is likely to result in what's occurring on your site in some browsers or browser versions.
    As a general rule, you should attempt to use Web Fonts whenever you can. Use "Web Safe" fonts as a second choice. And only use System fonts as a last resort and only for small amounts of text (since they become an image when output).
    If you want a specific portion of text to absolutely never go to two lines, you'll want to put it in a text frame that significantly wider than the text so when the line length varies the text doesn't wrap to a new line.
    "Web Safe" fonts are not a single font but actually a list/stack of fonts where the browser goes through the list until it finds a font that's available on the current viewer's device. The fonts in the list/stack are similar in visual appearance and font metrics, but any difference in font metrics is sufficient to result in changes in line breaks, so when using web safe fonts you need to account for much larger variations in line length and line breaking than will occur when using a Web Font.

  • Pictures look different when imported

    For some reason when I import pictures into iphoto they look a little darker/warmer and not as crisp. Has anyone seen this before? Is there anyway to correct this issue?
    Thank you,
    JBN

    JBN77
    Sounds like the pics are not color managed, or differently color managed from iPhoto. Where are these pics from?
    Regards
    TD

  • Image viewed in Photoshop CC looks different when viewed in Elements 11 Organizer, why?

    I'm viewing a Nikon raw file (.nef) in Bridge CC, Camera Raw, and then in Photoshop CC.  In Camera Raw I've made some adjustments before viewing it in Photoshop.  For cataloging I prefer to use Photoshop Elements 11 Organizer (there are several reasons why that I won't go into here).  When I get the image looking the way I want it to look in Photoshop and subsequently view the image in Elements Organizer the image in Organizer is not a good match to what is displayed in Photoshop.  I particularly notice that nice blue sky tones appearing in Photoshop are shifted toward cyan in Elements Organizer.  What is causing the mismatch in image color between the two Adobe products?
    I've also noticed that the new Radial Filter that's available in the latest Camera Raw is not processed by Elements Organizer 11.  Would this be processed in Elements 12?

    I'm viewing a Nikon raw file (.nef) in Bridge CC, Camera Raw, and then in Photoshop CC.  In Camera Raw I've made some adjustments before viewing it in Photoshop.  For cataloging I prefer to use Photoshop Elements 11 Organizer (there are several reasons why that I won't go into here).  When I get the image looking the way I want it to look in Photoshop and subsequently view the image in Elements Organizer the image in Organizer is not a good match to what is displayed in Photoshop.  I particularly notice that nice blue sky tones appearing in Photoshop are shifted toward cyan in Elements Organizer.  What is causing the mismatch in image color between the two Adobe products?
    I've also noticed that the new Radial Filter that's available in the latest Camera Raw is not processed by Elements Organizer 11.  Would this be processed in Elements 12?

  • Display issue : it looks different in muse and with all browsers please help!

    Hello,
    I'm new on this forum and a really beginer with adobe Muse and website design...
    Also I'm french so please forgive my aproximative English...
    Here is my problem:
    I'm triyng to create a website with Muse and first it seems to be easy.
    I use a free template, and now I'm designing the page master but the problem is  when I try to preview it appears like the picture I enclosed.
    The target appearance is in the second file enclosed.
    My page seeting is :
    I tried to find a solution by myself but I can't find what's the problem...I tried to preview in an another screen and browser but it's the same problem...
    Can somebody help me please? It will save me...this is my first work project ever and I want to do it well !
    Thank you

    Hi
    As you are using a very wide page 2000+ , browser adds a scroll to view the page content.
    Please try to scale down the page width and height which will solve the issue.
    You can set width and height from page properties but if you add contents then page will stretch according to the page elements added.
    Thanks,
    Sanjit

  • Tableview selection looks different when using iterator

    One more litte question about the htmlb:tableView (Design2003, content-style = "tradeshow", selectMode = "MULTISELECT").
    When you select a table line, the line is displayed with an orange background. However, if you use a tableView Iterator where you use a textView as the replacement_bee to display some text, this text is not displayed with an orange background, but with only an orange border and a white bacground.
    Is there anything I can do?

    I'm currently working on SP-Upgrade-Checks (47 to 54) for our web applications, and this is one of the things I've noticed.
    Got hold up because of some more urgent duties, but as far as I remember I dealt with part of it already successfully. There are still some open questions I have though, and I hope to get back to this thread as soon as I can make some clear statements about it.
    cheers,
    Max

  • Page formatting looks ok in iweb put looks different when published

    Hi
    I just got a new MAC Book Pro, and am still using the iweb o8. Today I made a web page that looked very much like a resume...indents , bullets, alignment. it looks great on the screen in iweb...but when I publish it and access through safari...all of the indents etc are gone or changed. Any clue what I am doing wrong? Thanks for any suggestions

    No I haven't tried that but I will try it later tonight. Should I do it in word and then convert that doc to a pdf and then use that. The reason I ask is that I did turn the iweb page into a pdf because I wanted to proof it in paper form (old fashioned, I guess)...and when I printed the pdf document is was huge..
    or maybe it looks small on iweb and in the actual web page and the pdf is normal size I was using 14pt type so it was readable on iweb...but when I printed the pdf it didn't fit on a page width wise, and the printed copy looked like 14 pt type....but the iweb page looked about 10 pt.
    anyway I will try your suggestion and let you know
    I tried to take screen shot...to show the misalignment of the text....but I couldn't get the screen shot into this screen.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Cannot send iMessages to one of my contacts

    I have a new iPhone 5s.  iMessages work with all of my other iPhone contacts, but one.  It worked with him intermittently and now has stopped completely.   For a few days the only thing I could do was send him Texts (which came up in green on my scre

  • Apps crashing, can't send problem to apple, software update app crashes....

    I came back after a two month summer vacation (I unplugged the computer while I was away) and I went to update the software and then the software update app crashed. I tried to report the problem to apple, but it says that the submission failed, "you

  • How to update records marked by [row selector] ?

    Hello, I have a small table (PK=record_id) from which I send mail to a user of informational reasons. At the moment I can only send all records in a mail, but I want to be more 'selective', send only marked records. The table is shown in a APEX-repor

  • STO Frieght values redetermination in MM

    Hi Please let me the procedure to redetermine the Frieght/Tax values based on Delivery date in STO. Scenario, Tax amount from plant to non excisable plant, excise duty should be loaded to material cost. But excise duties are chaged on daily basis as

  • Operation subcontracting - excess component issue to vendor

    Hi gurus, Operation subcontracting Issue of component to operation subcontractor with excess material. After goods receipt from subcontracting what is the impact at subcontractor vendor stock , costing and financial for excess issue stock. example As