Photo Organization and the Future

Here's my concern - utilizing aperture to organize my projects and albums, departing from managing the file structure (which is getting impossible to keep up with) I have to assume that Apple and Aperture will always be around.
What if in the future I want to switch to Light Room, or go back to windows? I have nearly 35,000 photo's now, and I imagine I'll have more in 50 years but I have no idea if Aperture will still be around in 50 years and If I stop paying attention to my file structure, I'll lose all the organization behind my masters.
Aren't any of you concerned about the distant future? Apple could pull the plug on Aperture; somebody else could come out with somethign better; etc.

Jbrenner wrote:
If I stop paying attention to my file structure, I'll lose all the organization behind my masters.
Aren't any of you concerned about the distant future? Apple could pull the plug on Aperture; somebody else could come out with somethign better; etc.
No, I'm not concerned about my file structure. The fact that Aperture takes care of that for Managed libraries doesn't mean that there is no structure. The library normally resides in the Pictures folder. If you open the package you will find the folder for all your masters - the structure there can be easily decoded. There are lots of other files used by Aperture when manipulating or displaying images. If you need to get your original photo images at some time they are there. If you shoot in RAW then you might need to worry about some future time when no one supports your camera's version of RAW, but that's a different issue. You can also, in the distant future, export your edited photos to a new location.
If you have a Referenced library then you are responsible for the storage, backup and structure of those images.

Similar Messages

Before updating my iphone 3G to iOS 5 all the photos i synced were lpaced in my photo gallery only. Know I have both Photo gallery and The folder I synced

Before updating my iphone 3G to iOS 5 all the photos i synced were lpaced in my photo gallery only. Know I have both Photo gallery and The folder I synced. Can somebody help me and tell me how can i have it the old way? if its applicable. Thank you

Hi Urs
I searched a lot and maybe found a part of the reason for this high data traffic.
I'm synchronizing my contacts, calendar & reminder with iCloud & my mail with Hotmail.
When push is activated for Hotmail, that doesn't matter, but when push is activated for iCloud, the amount of data nearly explodes. So I turned iCloud to manual and let Hotmail on push.
Contacts, calendar & reminder are synchronizing when opened (I think this is enough).
Also I do a backup on iCloud and than I deactivate the function (I do not delete the last backup, I only deactivate the option for automatic backup).
It seems, that the backup functionality also generates traffic when not on WiFi - especially at night!!
The battery life has been getting better, when I deactivated the support for automatic time zone changes (location services were always on).
The battery finaly got MUCH BETTER since the update on iOS 5.0.1.
My traffic is actually higher than on iOS 4 but not so high as before I deactivated some services...
I hope this info is a little help for you!!
Let me know if this works for you, ok?
Best regards,
Wolfgang

I have just installed iPhoto 11 and all of photos on my iphone have now all disappeared and ended up in my photo stream and the library in iphoto does not display all my pictures?? Can anyone help?

I have just installed iPhoto 11 and all of photos on my iphone have now all disappeared and ended up in my photo stream and the library in iphoto does not display all my pictures?? Can anyone help?

And I cant work out why all of my pictures are not diplaying in iphoto?
Is this iPhoto on your Mac? Are you referring to the photos that were in your iPhoto LIbrary prior to the upgrade to iPhoto 11? If so then apply the two fixes below in order as needed:
Fix #1
1 - launch iPhoto with the Command+Option keys held down and rebuild the library.
2 - run Option #4 to rebuild the database.
Fix #2
Using iPhoto Library Manager to Rebuild Your iPhoto Library
1 - download iPhoto Library Manager and launch.
2 - click on the Add Library button and select the library you want to add in the selection window..
3 - Now that the library is listed in the left hand pane of iPLM, click on your library and go to the Library ➙ Rebuild Library menu option.
4 - In the next window name the new library and select the location you want it to be placed.
5 - Click on the Create button.
Note: This creates a new library based on the LIbraryData.xml file in the library and will recover Events, Albums, keywords, titles and comments. However, books, calendars, cards and slideshows will be lost. The original library will be left untouched for further attempts at fixing the problem or in case the rebuilt library is not satisfactory.
If that's not what you're referring to then you should describe what is happening in more detail. Remember we can't see your Mac or your iPhone so need detailed and accurate descriptions of what you're experiencing.
Also we need infomartion like do you have an iCloud account and are you logged into it on all of your devices, iPhoto and Mac? do you have Photo Stream enabled on both.
OT

My problem is a sudden loss of ability to get to PSE12 Organizer when I tried to load a saved scan. Had been using the Organizer and the Editor with no problems for several hours just before that.     Can not load the Organizer from the icon at the bottom

My problem is a sudden loss of ability to get to PSE12 Organizer when I tried to load a saved scan. Had been using the Organizer and the Editor with no problems for several hours just before that.
Can not load the Organizer from the icon at the bottom of Editor screen, from the icon on the MacBook Air dock (OS 10.10.2), nor from the file in applications located with Finder.
I have tried without success to access Organizer after turning off and on the scanner, turning off and on the computer, loading a fresh copy of PSE12 from the CD, and restoring default preferences. I have searched on line for other options but not found any.
Can you help me?

Not Charge
- See:
iPod touch: Hardware troubleshooting
iPhone and iPod touch: Charging the battery
- Try another cable. The cable for 5G iPod (lightning connector) seems to be more prone to failure than the older cable.
- If a 5G iPod
Iphone 5 lightning port charging problem - SOLUTION!
- Try another charging source
- Inspect the dock connector on the iPod for bent or missing contacts, foreign material, corroded contacts, broken, missing or cracked plastic.
- Make an appointment at the Genius Bar of an Apple store.
Apple Retail Store - Genius Bar

Why are there 2 folders created - the photo library and the synced folder

Why are there 2 folders created on the iPhone during a sync? The photo library and the synced folder both show up.

Thanks for your help mate
This is what I've got, should I modify it?
Thanks again BDAqua,
Have a G'day

What is the difference between the photo library and the photo stream?

What is the difference between the photo library and the photo stream on the I phone?

Photo Library stores photos transferred from your computer via the iTunes sync/transfer process.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4486

I took a photo class and the tech showed me how to take iPhoto images and export to an external hard drive. However, I do not recall how this was done. Can anyone provide me with step by step instructions? TIA!

I took a photo class and the tech showed me how to take iPhoto images and export to an external hard drive. However, I do not recall how this was done. Can anyone provide me with step by step instructions? TIA!

iPhoto->:File->Export…. BTW, iPhoto and OS version would help; whereas, iOS version doesn't.

Portal and the Future.

We are under going a major re-development effort on our internal and external sites. Part of the project will be using portal.
We are planning the Portal part prototype on 1.0.2.2 but are a little concerned about the future changes of portal. We assume that the portal will have an upgrade script but we are worried more on the provider classes. Are they going to remain the same? Should we develop now or wait for the new version? Will it give us added access to the portal API to allow for addition functionality?
Thanks,

In iAS v9.0.2 (the next release of iAS), there will be 2 versions of the JPDK API - version 1 and version 2.
Version 1 is virtually identical to JPDK 3.0.9 (no API changes), with some additional functionality for supporting mobile devices. Version 1 will be supported as long as Oracle Portal release 3.0.x is supported.
Version 2 has some API changes and the packages have been re-organized. If you use the DefaultProvider and DefaultPortlet classes currently, the changes to you code will mainly be changes to import statements to reflect the new package structure. If you implement the Provider & Portlet interfaces or extend DefaultProvider/DefaultPortlet, you will have some additional code changes, but the changes are relatively simple.
In addition, most of the interfaces have been replaced by abstract classes.
These changes were made in the interest of future stability - allowing the API to be extended without breaking existing implementations.

Help! Photo organization and archiving.

I just switched from a pc to a mac and am having nothing but problems. I personally regret ever buying it. I even bought one to one care, but live 6 hours from a mac store and so feel like I'm struggling in the dark. I hope so much I can find help here.
I have thousands of photos that Mac transferred over in a data transfer. All my photos are in albums and sub albums that I title by month, year and event. All of my albums were transferred, but do not show up as albums in iphoto. When I try to find my photos from the finder, or while uploading to facebook or flickr, iphoto either doesn't show up or it lists albums by years I didn't create (such as 2034, 2020, 1993 which doesn't even have my 1993 photos in it).
I thought I would have to recreate all my albums, but the few I have tried to recreate also don't show up when trying to access the photos from other sites (like mentioned above).
I also don't know why I can't access the photo albums from finder (similar to accessing photos from the c: drive on a pc, so I have control of how I want to back them up, or if I want to access them from another source)
I also have not found a way to save changes to photos or save to a different location.
I also have not found a way to scan photos from my scanner into iphoto.
Is there another photo program beside iphoto one can use on a mac that would allow these functions?
These are just a few of my frustrations. Please, please help.

Some basics for you:
You can still work your photos on the Mac in the same way that you did on Windows. Just set up your system of folders in the Finder (the Mac equivalent of Windows Explorer) and off you go. The advantages of that system are that it is simple. The disadvantage is that it's very limited.
iPhoto is different from that. It's a database for organising your photos, not your photo files. The Idea is to let iPhoto manage the files and let you get on the photos. The big advantages to this is that there are pretty much unlimited ways to organise your files - date, keyword, titles, ratings, camera, arbitrary selections that you make your self, whatever - plus the photos are accessibel throughout the entire OS. They are also easy to back up.
First off: to deal accessing the Files for uploading or whatever:
There are many, many ways to access your files in iPhoto:
*For Users of 10.5 and later*
You can use any Open / Attach / Browse dialogue. On the left there's a Media heading, your pics can be accessed there. Command-Click for selecting multiple pics.
Uploaded with plasq's Skitch!
(Note the above illustration is not a Finder Window. It's the dialogue you get when you go File -> Open)
You can access the Library from the New Message Window in Mail:
Uploaded with plasq's Skitch!
*For users of 10.4 and later* ...
Many internet sites such as Flickr and SmugMug have plug-ins for accessing the iPhoto Library. If the site you want to use doesn’t then some, one or any of these will also work:
To upload to a site that does not have an iPhoto Export Plug-in the recommended way is to Select the Pic in the iPhoto Window and go File -> Export and export the pic to the desktop, then upload from there. After the upload you can trash the pic on the desktop. It's only a copy and your original is safe in iPhoto.
This is also true for emailing with Web-based services. However, if you're using Gmail you can use iPhoto2GMail
If you use Apple's Mail, Entourage, AOL or Eudora you can email from within iPhoto.
If you use a Cocoa-based Browser such as Safari, you can drag the pics from the iPhoto Window to the Attach window in the browser.
*If you want to access the files with iPhoto not running*:
For users of 10.6 and later:
You can download a free Services component from MacOSXAutomation which will give you access to the iPhoto Library from your Services Menu. Using the Services Preference Pane you can even create a keyboard shortcut for it.
For Users of 10.4 and later:
Create a Media Browser using Automator (takes about 10 seconds) or use this free utility Karelia iMedia Browser
Other options include:
1. *Drag and Drop*: Drag a photo from the iPhoto Window to the desktop, there iPhoto will make a full-sized copy of the pic.
2. *File -> Export*: Select the files in the iPhoto Window and go File -> Export. The dialogue will give you various options, including altering the format, naming the files and changing the size. Again, producing a copy.
3. *Show File*: Right- (or Control-) Click on a pic and in the resulting dialogue choose 'Show File'. A Finder window will pop open with the file already selected.
I also haven't been able to find out how to scan a photo into iphoto. I've searched all the menu's, the help menu's and apple forum.
That's because you can't use iPhoto to scan. What you do is scan with other Software (Image Capture (in your Applications Folder, for instance, or whatever came with your scanner) and then import the scans to iPhoto (File -> Import, Drag and Drop to the iPhoto Window etc)
Regards
TD

I am running iPhoto version 9.6 on a 2012 iMac using OS X Yosemite 10.10.1. One event in iPhoto has lost all photo information, and the photos are viewed very small.

One event in iPhoto version 9.6 has lost all the original photo information, and views the photos as very small.

started in 2007 and transferred to my latest Mac in 2012.
How did you transfer the library to the new Mac?
How did you upgrade the iPhoto application and library after upgrading to Yosemite?

ColdFusion and The Future

Admittedly, I've been a bit out of touch ... however I was
wondering what the future of ColdFusion is regarding Adobe... have
they made any announcements about the future of ColdFusion? How
will it compete with formats such as PHP/mySQL in the future? Being
a long time fan of Cold fusion, I'm curious about this.

>> 2. Image manipulation functionality -- provides both
high-level tag
based abstractions for common tasks like resizing, cropping,
and
format conversions
That so slack how CF still doesn't have this functionality
already - lets
hope its not too late to make a difference. Nice feature
though, sounds like
it may be quite sophisticated.
All in all though, based on what has been revealed here, it
doesn't sound
like much of an update - would still like to see some higher
level
framwework stuff, or maybe even a ColdFusion IDE (Heck, how
can they sell
this product at this price and not even offer an IDE for it?)
Lets hope the future reveals something a little more exciting
than what was
mentioned here.
"MikerRoo" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:[email protected]...
> Ben Forta just today sent out an email on this subject.
>
>
quote:
>
> SCORPIO -- A COMMITMENT TO COLDFUSION(R) FROM ADOBE.
>
>
> Hello Fellow ColdFusion Developers!
>
> Ben Forta, your friendly Adobe Senior Technical
Evangelist here.
> I want to give you a quick update on "Scorpio," the
code-name for
> the next major release of ColdFusion software.
>
> In case you missed the buzz at MAX 2006, we took the
"wraps" off
> Scorpio in keynote presentations and sessions by members
of the
> ColdFusion engineering team. Scorpio is still under
development but
> we can give you a preview of things to come, including:
>
> 1. The new Scorpio "server monitor" feature -- This web
> application (with a really cool front-end of Adobe(R)
Flex(TM) 2
> software), simplifies troubleshooting during
development, helps
> identify performance bottlenecks on production servers
and allows
> administrators to monitor overall server health, while
receiving
> alerts if something goes wrong. Additionally, an API
allows you to
> write your own front-ends with things like custom
monitors, bots or
> server health reports. To learn more, see Ashwin
Mathew's MAX
> presentation on the server monitor by visiting the
following link:
> <Personalized link removed>
>
> 2. Image manipulation functionality -- provides both
high-level tag
> based abstractions for common tasks like resizing,
cropping, and
> format conversions -- and low-level processing of images
with the
> addition of over 50 functions to the ColdFusion Markup
Language (CFML).
>
> 3. More advanced enterprise integration -- allows
ColdFusion
> applications to natively access .NET objects, integrate
with
> Adobe PDF files and forms, and more.
>
> We're planning to release Scorpio in mid-2007 and I am
planning
> our traditional pre-launch user group tour for early
2007. We'll
> show you lots of Scorpio features in action.
>
> I'd like to encourage you to keep up with all of the
developments
> we're making, including beta version availability, as
well as tour
> dates and locations. Just visit the link to the Adobe
Labs page
> below:
> <Personalized link removed>
>
> Thanks!
> Ben "Scorpio Man" Forta
>
> Better by Adobe(TM)
>
>
>
> Adobe, "Better by Adobe", ColdFusion, and Flex are
either registered
> trademarks or trademarks of Adobe Systems Incorporated,
in the
> United States, and/or other countries. All other
trademarks are
> the property of their respective owners.
>
> Copyright 2006 Adobe Systems Incorporated. All rights
reserved.
>
>
>

HT1296 upon syncing my ipad with my mac, the process reversed and sent pictures back to the ipad on the camera roll. Now none can be deleted. There is no trash showing up, only edit. Instead of the 900 pics in the photo stream, and the same in photos

I canot delete pics from my photos on ipad. During synching process to my mac the pictures started to suddenly be downloaded back to the ipad. I now have 900 pics in photos and the same in photo stream on the ipad. There is no trash can, only an "edit" choice.

There are 9 different versions of iPhoto and they run on 9 different versions of the Operating System. The tricks and tips for dealing with issues vary depending on the version of iPhoto and the version of the OS. So to get help you need to give as much information as you can. Include things like:
- What version of iPhoto.
- What version of the Operating System.
- Details. As full a description of the problem as you can. For example, if you have a problem with exporting, then explain by describing how you are trying to export, and so on.
- History: Is this going on long? Has anything been installed or deleted? - Are there error messages?
- What steps have you tried already to solve the issue.
- Anything unusual about your set up? Or how you use iPhoto?
Anything else you can think of that might help someone understand the problem you have.

Authorization loss and the future

For whatever reason, my laptop lost track of the fact that I'd deauthorized it before sending it in to have its MB replaced (Nvidia recall).
When I reauthorized, the process 'ate up' my remaining 5/5 authorizations.
(A) Is there any appeal process for this?
(B) I'm pretty sure that, a few years ago, I 'reset' my authorizations (you try having two teenagers in the house) and was told no more resets would be made available. Do I have this right? Worried about what will happen if I need a fresh authorization in the future.

Thank you!!!
Meg St._Clair wrote:> It is generally a good idea to deauthorize a computer before resinstalling system software or doing major hardware upgrades. Then, just reauthorize when you're done. This will prevent the problem.
Yep: thus this from my initial post here:
"I'd deauthorized it before sending it in to have its MB replaced (Nvidia recall)."

OWB bugs, missing functionality and the future of OWB

I'm working with OWB for some time now and there are a lot of rough edges to discover. Functionality and stability leave a lot to be desired. Here's a small and incomplete list of things that annoy me:
Some annoying OWB bugs (OWB 10g 10.1.0.2.0):
- The debugger doesn't display the output parameters of procedures called in pre-mapping processes (displays nothing, treats values as NULL). The mapping itself works fine though.
- When calling selfmade functions within an expression OWB precedes the function call with a constant "Functions." which prevents the function from being executed and results in an error message
- Occasionally OWB cannot open mappings and displays an error message (null pointer exception). In this case the mapping cannot be opened anymore.
- Occasionally when executing mappings OWB doesn't remember changes in mappings even when the changes were committed and deployed
- When using aggregators in mappings OWB scrambles the order of the output attributes
- The deployment of mappings sometimes doesn't work. After n retries it works without having changed anything in the mapping
- When recreating an external table directly after dropping the table OWB recreates the external table but always displays both an error message and a success message.
- In Key Lookups the screen always gets garbled when selecting an attribute as a join condition
- Usage of constants results in aborts in the debugger
- When you reconcile a table used in a key lookup the lookup condition sometimes changes. OWB seems to remember only the position of the lookup condition attribute but not the name.
- In the process of validating a mapping often changes in the mapping get lost and errors occur like 'Internal Errors' or 'Null Pointer Exceptions'.
- When you save the definition of external tables OWB always adds 2 whitespace columns to the beginning of all the lines following 'ORGANISATION EXTERNAL'. If you save a lot of external table definitions you get files with hundreds of leading whitespaces.
Poor or missing functionality:
- No logging on the level of single records possible. I'd like the possibility to see the status of each single record in each operator like using 'verbose data' in PowerCenter
- The order of the attributes cannot be changed. This really pisses me off expecially if operators like the aggregator scramble the order of attributes.
- No variables in expressions possible
- Almost unusable lookup functionality (no cascading lookups, no lookup overrides, no unconnected lookups, only equal condition in key lookups)
- No SQL overrides in soruces possible
- No mapplets, shared containers or any kind a reusable transformations
- No overview functionality for mappings. Often it's very hard to find a leftover operator in a big mapping.
- No copy function for attributes
- Printing functionality is completely useless
- No documentation functionality for mappings (reports)
- Debugger itself needs debugging
- It's very difficult to mark connections between attributes of different operations. It's almost impossible to mark a group of connections without marking connections you don't want to mark.
I really wonder which of the above bugs and mssing functionality 'Paris' will address. From what I read about 'Paris' not many if at all. If Oracle really wants to be a competitor (with regard to functionality) to Informatica, IBM/Ascential etc. they have a whole lot of work to do or purchase Informatica or another of the leading etl tool
vendors.
What do you think about OWB? Will it be a competitor for the leading etl tools or just a cheap database add on and become widely used like SAB BW not for reasons of technology or functionality but because it's cheap?
Looking forward to your opinions.
Jörg Menker

Thanks to you two for entertaining my thoughts so far. Let me respond to you latest comments.
Okay, lets not argue which one is better.. when a tool is there .. then there are some reasons to be there...But the points raised by Jorg and me are really very annoying. Overall I agree with both yours and Jorg's points (and I did not think it was an argument...merely sharing our observations with each other (;^)
The OWB tool is not as mature as Informatica. However, Informatica has no foothold in the database engine itself and as I mentioned earlier, is still "on the outside looking in..." The efficiency and power of set-based activity versus row-based activity is substantial.
Looking at it from another way lets take a look at Microstrategy as a way of observing a technical strategy for product development. Microstrategy focused on the internals (the engine) and developed it into the "heavy-lifting" tool in the industry. It did this primarily by leveraging the power of the backend...the database and the hosting server. For sheer brute force, it was champion of the day. It was less concerned with the pretty presentation and more concerned with getting the data out of the back-end so the user didn't have to sit there for a day and wait. Now they have begun to focus on the presentation part.
Likewise this seems to be the strategy that Oracle has used for OWB. It is designed around the database engine and leverages the power of the database to do its work. Informatica (probably because it needs to be all things to all people) has tended to view the technical offerings of the database engine as a secondary consideration in its architectural approach and has probably been forced to do so more now that Oracle has put themselves in direct competition with Informatica. To do otherwise would make their product too complex to maintain and more vendor-specific.
I am into the third data warehousing/data migration project and my previous two have been on Informatica (3 years on it).I respect your experience and your opinions...you are not a first timer. The tasks we have both had to solve and how we solved them with these tools are not necessarily the same. Could be similar in instances; could be quite different.
So the general tendency is to evaluate the tool and try to see how things that were needed to be done in my previous projects can be done with this tool. I am afraid to say .. I am still not sure how these can be implemented in OWB. The points raised by us are probably the fall out of this deficiency.One observation that I would make is that in my experience, calls to the procedural language in the database engine have tended to perform very poorly with Informatica. Informatica's scripting language is week. Therefore, if you do not have direct usability of a good, strong procedural language to tackle some complicated tasks, then you will be in a pickle when the solution is not well suited to a relational-based approach. Informatica wants you to do most things outside of the database (in the map primarily). It is how you implement the transformation logic. OWB is built entirely around the relational, procedural, and ETL components in the Oracle database engine. That is what the tool is all about.
If cost is the major factor for deciding a tool then OWB stands far ahead...Depends entirely on the client and the situation. I have implemented solutions for large companies and small companies. I don't use a table saw to cut cake and I don't use a pin knife to fall trees. Right tool for the right job.
...thats what most managers do .. without even looking how in turn by selecting such a tool they make the life tough for the developers.Been there many times. Few non-technical managers understand the process of tool evaluation and selection and the value a good process adds to the project. Nor do they understand the implications of making a bad choice (cost, productivity, maintainability).
The functionality of OWB stands way below Informatica.If you are primarily a GUI-based implementer that is true. However, I have often found that when I have been brought in to fix performance problems with Informatica implementations that the primary problem is usually with the way that the developer implemented it. Too often I have found that the developer understands how to implement logic in the GUI component (the Designer/Maps and Sessions) with a complete lack of understanding of how all this activity will impact load performance (they don't understand how the database engine works.) For example, a strong feature in Informatica is the ability to override the default SQL statement generated by Informatica. This was a smart design decision on Informatica's part. I have frequently had to go into the "code" and fix bad joins, split up complex operations, and rip out convoluted logic to get the maps to perform within a reasonable load window. Too often these developers are only viewing the problem through the "window" of the tool. They are not stepping back and look at the problem in the context of the overall architecture. In part Informatica forces them to do this. Another possible factor is they probably don't know better.
"One tool...one solution"
Microstrategy until recently had been suffering from that same condition of not allowing the developer to create the actual query). OWB engineers need to rethink their strategy on overriding the SQL.
The functionality of OWB stands way below Informatica.In some ways yes. If you do a head-to-head comparison of the GUI then yes. In other ways OWB is better (Informatica does not measure up when you compare it with all of the architectural features that the Oracle database engine offers). They need to fix the bugs and annoyances though.
.. but even the GUI of Informatica is better than OWB and gives the developer some satisfaction of working in it.Believe me I feel your pain. On the other hand, I have suffered from Informatica bugs. Ever do a port from one database eingine to another just to have it convert everything into multi-byte? Ever have it re-define your maps to parallel processing threads when you didn't ask it to?
Looking at the technical side of things I can give you one fine example ... there is no function in Oracle doing to_integer (to_number is there) but Informatica does that ... Hmm-m-m...sorry, I don't get the point.
The style of ETL approach of Informatica is far more appealing.I find it unnecessarily over-engineered.
OWB has two advantages : It is basically free of cost and it has a big brother in Oracle.
It is basically free of cost...When you are another "Microsoft", you can throw your weight around. The message for Informatica is "don't bite the hand that feeds you." Bad decisions at the top.
Regards,
Dan Phillips

Photo Organizer and Editor

I'm looking to go away from some of the free editors and organizers, but finding the solution that is best for me is challenging. For a basic photo / video editor and organization what product would statisfy my needs? I have probably a few thousand photos but also need a way to categorize and organzie them. Any suggestions and direction would be appreciated.
Thanks!

Hi,
Adobe Photoshop Elements Editor is now available on Mac App Store to download. It is Editor only and does not have Organizer similar to PSE 10 Editor on Mac App Store.
Some key points are here - http://blogs.adobe.com/pselements/adobe-photoshop-elements-11-editor-available-on-mac-app- store/
Thanks,
Garry

Photo Organization and the Future

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for