Photoshop and LiveType together?

If I would create a template or image in Photoshop can be imported into LiveType? Can it be animated, and its also compatible with LiveType? How large does the file can be? Any tips will be welcome!
Thanks
Luis

If I would create a template or image in Photoshop can be imported into LiveType?
Yes.
Can it be animated, and its also compatible with LiveType?
The only way I know to create an animation in Photoshop is to use the Filmstrip QuickTime component, which lets you create a big vertical image containing all of the frames of the animation, one atop another. It's pretty unwieldy though, and it's definitely not the obvious choice of tools for the job! But if you want to go that way, and you have that QuickTime component, LiveType will let you import a filmstrip image as an animation.
How large does the file can be? Any tips will be welcome!
The only limit is your patience. Really big files (say, thousands of pixels wide) will take a long time to render.

Similar Messages

  • Photoshop AND Bridge together?

    Hi Everybody,
    I would need Photoshop AND Bridge, only.
    I can't find the information to rent both software together.
    Is it automatically included with photoshop?
    Otherwise how can I rent Photoshop AND Bridge together?
    Thank you for your answer guys
    Cheers,
    RémiC

    Thank you for quick answer, I really appreciate
    Cheers
    R

  • Can I make a website with just using Photoshop and Flash together?

    I am new to web design and am working on a website. I have not purchased dreamweaver, but am familiar with it from school. I do have Adobe Flash and Photoshop extended. Can I just use the two programs Adobe Flash, and Photoshop extended to complete a website without having Dreamweaver or do I need Dreamweaver to make it work? Thank you for your responses.

    You can import photoshop files into a flash project and build a website that way.  Both Catalyst and Flash can output the markup necessary to make your flash website usable.  As a developer though I try to steer people away from entire flash websites since they wont be usable on Apple Mobile and Tablet Devices.  Youll need to read up on optimizing a flash sites SEO, this can only partially be done through flash.  A text editer may be required to create additional files for your website.  Good Luck!

  • Photoshop and Illustrator sometimes hang when working together (CS 5.5)

    Hi all,
    I'm working with Adobe Creative Suite Design Premium 5.5 and sometimes, when I have Photoshop and Illustrator opened together, if I try to open something a little more complex (but not to heavy), one of the programs hang or freeze.
    This is a Windows 7 (64bits) Service Pack 1 environment, on a HP Workstation 2.67Ghz Quad with 8GB of RAM, using a NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800. At a first glance - and regarding the files usage - it doesn't seem to have a reason to happen.
    I've updated the program versions and let Photoshop use more than 60% of the available RAM. When this happens, 50% of the physical RAM is available.
    Besides having these two apps running, I have Outlook 2010, Linotype Font Explorer Pro and some LAN policies active.
    Does anyone had a similar problem that could kindly help?
    Many thanks,
    Tiago

    What does Windows Event Viewer say about the matter? if it is as arbitrary as you say, then it's most likely network issues or graphics issues. In the latter case simply install a suitable driver and configure it properly, in case of network issues (to which in particular Ilklustrator is extremely sensitive), store the files on a local harddrive.
    Mylenium

  • Can I "Lock" Photoshop CS3 and Bridge Together ?

    I like to have Photoshop and Bridge open together.
    However, every time I click on the Bridge interface, either accidentally or to reposition it etc. Photoshop vanishes and I have to bring it back.
    Whilst it is not a terrible malfunction it is irritating and it never occurred with the Browser in Photoshop Elements 2.
    Is it possible to lock them together so that PS will never disappear ?

    Adobe has already very conveniently linked Bridge and Photoshop together for you, in several ways other than window clicking and other than what OS X provides.
    On the File menu in Photoshop, there's a "Browse" command that goes to Bridge. In Bridge, there's a "Return to Adobe Photoshop" command. That sounds odd but here's the thing: They use the same keyboard shortcut, Command+Option+O. So if you learn that one single shortcut, you can flip between Bridge and Photoshop instantly. I use Command+Tab a lot too, but that can be a pain if you have a lot of apps open. Command+Option+O is a direct express route between Photoshop and Bridge.
    If you prefer mouse clicks, when you're in Photoshop you can get to Bridge by clicking the Go To Bridge button in the options bar at the top of the screen. From Bridge to Photoshop, of course you just double-click the file you want to open in Photoshop.
    Bridge also has File > Close and Go To Bridge (Command+Shift+W), which is great if you finished editing a file and want to get to the next file in the folder. Just hit Command+Option+W, Photoshop closes the file and pops you back to Bridge, you hit the arrow key to get to the next file, hit Return and boom you're back in Photoshop with the new file.
    The links are all there and ready to go.

  • I want to use ps and illustrator together, but I just bought the photoshop membership, could I upgrade my membership?

    I want to use ps and illustrator together, but I just bought the photoshop membership, could I upgrade my membership?

    You may upgrade to the entire plan, or just add an individual program subscription
    Upgrade single to all Cloud http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1235382
    Cloud Plans https://creative.adobe.com/plans
    -and subscription terms http://www.adobe.com/misc/subscription_terms.html
    -what is in the entire Cloud http://www.adobe.com/creativecloud/catalog/desktop.html
    -http://www.adobe.com/products/catalog/mobile._sl_id-contentfilter_sl_catalog_sl_mobiledevi ces.html

  • Hello and good day, can someone share me here in the Forum may, if they found a Adobe can put together package? Basically, I need only Photoshop and Adobe Premiere Pro! About a response I'd like Very much. Thank you very much and greetings Ralf PS. Accord

    Hello and good day,
    can someone share me here in the Forum may, if they found a Adobe can put together package? Basically, I need only Photoshop and Adobe Premiere Pro! About a response I'd like Very much. Thank you very much and greetings
    Ralf
    PS. According to Adobe, this should determine a Adobe ID be possible!

    You may buy two individual subscriptions
    Cloud Plans https://creative.adobe.com/plans
    -and subscription terms http://www.adobe.com/misc/subscription_terms.html

  • I am a student and I want to buy Photoshop and Bridge CS6. It has taken me sometime to get the money together and I dont seem to be able to buy it.

    Please can you tell me how to buy Photoshop and Bridge. I dont need any other products

    If you want Photoshop CS6 perpetual license (bundled with Bridge CS6) and nothing else then purchase online here
    Creative Suite 6

  • Recent graduate, beginning my career in theatre video - what's the cheapest way to get Photoshop and After Effects together?

    Hi,
    As I said, recent graduate. Not a lot of disposable income. I require Photoshop and After Effects to progress in my career. What's the best way to get these two programs with creative cloud?
    Thanks!
    Ellie

    There is a special photographers plan, and then buy a single item subscription for After Effects
    Cloud Plans https://creative.adobe.com/plans
    -and subscription terms http://www.adobe.com/misc/subscription_terms.html

  • How to Get Proper Video Screen Captures (Screencasts) of Photoshop and Lightroom in Win?

    Hello. I would like to get proper screen captures of Lightroom and Photoshop on Win 7/64, showing all screen elements as you see them. I tried FastStone Capture 8 and SnagIt 11.1, but they have various differing issues. Do you have a good hint?
    What's more: In my screen capture, i also want a mouse-click-sound each and every time the mouse is clicked. This is not "system audio", because the computer doesn't play a sound for every ordinary click. The capture software must add that sound. (I'm aware i can add the sound manually in post production, but want it recorded together with video.)
    Experience with Faststone Capture 8's video captures:
    I get well usable footage
    Does optionally record mouse-click-sound for each click, with adjustable volume
    Does not properly record some elements of Photoshop or Lightroom screens:
      - cursors sometimes look rough or double-sized 
    - Lightrooms "TAT (Target Correction Tool)" disappears while being dragged on the image
    - the color selector box of Lightroom's Adjustment Brush is not shown, while the cursor working within that color selector box is shown
    - Lightroom's three-second-splash-message after Undo etc. is not shown
    (All these missing elements do show up in *still* captures with Faststone Capture. They also *do* show up in video captures done with SnagIt, see below)
    Experience with Snagit 11.1's video captures:
    Does properly capture all those elements that FastStone does *not* capture (listed above)
    Does *not* optionally include a mouse-click-sound for each and every mouse click (they record "system audio", but a sound on every click is not "system audio", so a regular click on a menu item has no sound)
    Videos are less smooth, cursor sometimes "jumping"
    Now, do you know a screen capture software for Win 7 that can
    properly record *anything* that's seen within Lightroom and Photoshop
    and automatically add a mouse-click-sound for each and every click i do
    and produce smooth footage without "jumping cursors"?
    Thanks for your real-life experiences!

    Myles, thanks again, here are my findings with Camtasia:
    Camtasia:
    DOES record overlays like adjustment brush's colour selector
    .camrec format isn't offered for recording, only .trec and .avi (on Win 7), but trec is usable just as .camrec i guess
    Exported MP4 looks blurry and has colour blotches, that are not visible in the initial recording, only after exporting; this doesn't change at all after setting very high quality MP4 options; i guess i didn't look properly
    i see how to add mouse-click sounds; i don't like the sound they provide so much; maybe it can be exchanged.
    Other tests:
    Camstudio:
    mouse click sounds very weird (my mistake?)
    does NOT record LR overlays like adjustment brush's colour selector
    Screen-cast-o-matic, optionally online, free version:
    DOES record overlays like adjustment brush's colour selector. Mouse-click-sound not in free version. "System audio" is promised in paid version, but that does not necessarily mean a sound for each mouse-click. Contacted support for more
    Straightforward using, lots of short video tutorials (useful for absolute beginners).
    Free downloaded program 1.4 only works on primary monitor, the online launched app also records on secondary monitor
    Don't see option to record a "window", only set resolutions
    More "jumpy" than Faststone
    More interesting pro-version seems to be rent-only-licenced, at 15 USD per year, not a one-time-buy

  • Aperture, Photoshop, and Apple's possible direction for Image Editing

    All,
    After using Aperture now for several days, and reading many different forum topics, in particular this one which speaks of desired enhancements to Aperture:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=253594&tstart=0
    there is one thing that really sticks out on my mind. While all of us photographers have slightly different specifics to our workflow, in general they are very similar. And with respect to Aperture, there is one huge area where most of us seem to be hitting the brick wall: image adjustments, and by extension, image file management. Let me explain what I mean.
    I think it is a fair generalization to say that the vast majority of serious digital photographers are using Photoshop (or some other image editing app, but I'm just going to refer to Photoshop for convenience) for post-processing of some kind. In using Aperture, and figuring out how to fit it into workflow, we've got this situation of how to move from organization and image library management to the full gamut of image adjusting functionality (photoshop) and back again to library management. The need to use photoshop then exposes the issue of how files are stored on the filesystem, etc. Stay with me here...
    I have found myself thinking, and it is pretty clearly demonstrated in the forum topic mentioned above where folks are making suggestions for improvements to Aperture, that there's this barrel people are over in knowing whether Photoshop and Aperture should live in the workflow together, or whether Aperture should (or is intended to) replace Photoshop in the workflow. This got me to thinking about the fundamental question -- what is the intent, i.e. the vision for Aperture? Is it meant to replace Photoshop, or restated, is Aperture meant to be the app in which all image adjustments are to be made, OR is Aperture meant to just ease workflow, and is it intended not to be the primary app for image adjustments, but rather integrate with the primary image adjustment app?
    The reason I bring this up is that the answer to this question makes all the difference in what enhancement requests and what people should expect from Aperture now, and in future versions. If Aperture is the primary place for image adjustment, then its obvious that there are some very significant additions that need to take place to Aperture, and likewise, the issue of putting images on the filesystem becomes much less important. However, if Aperture is a workflow-easer, then such image adjustment improvements are minimally important if at all, and filesystem / Photoshop / PSD file integration becomes paramount.
    I know what Aperture does, what features it provides, etc. But I can't help but realize that its not really that clear (or I just don't understand yet) what the full scope of Aperture now and in the future is intended to be, and the forum topics are pretty decent documentation of the fact that the user base at this point is fairly cloudy on that too.
    I can't help thinking that in the midst of the Apple pro line of tools, where we have tools that edit: video, audio, DVD creation, text effects, and now digital photography workflow, that there's one glaring hole: static image editing, i.e. a direct Photoshop competitor. I went through the Aperture video demos before Aperture shipped, and watched these photo pros talk incessantly about how "now there's an app that addresses how I work -- Aperture". That's great, but Apple has to know the role that Photoshop plays in present photography workflow -- for those pros too. So I'm sitting here thinking to myself, why would Apple roll out such a product with some clear workflow hurdles to common Photoshop usage.
    Ok, here's the punchline: does anyone else here have a sneaking suspicion that Apple is not to far off from releasing their own image editing application that's a direct Photoshop competitor? I mean come on, Final Cut Pro, Motion, Sountrack, and by extension of the CEO to Pixar, Renderman. How can you not have a static image adjustment application entering the scene at some point?
    I'm curious what others think. I'm just trying to make sense of how to fit the neat stuff I see in Aperture into a workflow that doesn't play very nicely with Aperture at some points (because I'm using Photoshop).
    Brad
    Powerbook G4-1.33GHz-17" / Powermac G4-1.4GHz   Mac OS X (10.4.2)   PB: 1GB RAM, Radeon 9600-64MB / PM: 1.25GB RAM, Radeon 9000Pro-128MB

    So Apple adds curves adjustments,
    we'll need noise reduction, greater sharpening
    capability, etc., etc., and then when we have all
    those features, surely we'll need masking and select
    capability to perform those adjustments selectively,
    etc. Where does it end?
    Actually that could be a good cut-off point - add a few more/better 'global' adjustments but leave all mask, selection and layer based tasks to external editors. Personally, I used to swear by curves, but haven't really touched them in PS for a year since shooting more RAW and learning how to use the shadow/highlight adjustment properly. Sometimes for overall colour for JPEGs, but that bit can be done just as well in levels.
    My workflow isn't particularly typical, but here goes.
    Type of photography - stitched panoramas as a professional, plus general snapshots/nature/landscape as hobby. Single user with no network storage.
    Currently I use a very organised folder structure in the Finder, along with aliases in DragThing docks for easy access to final stitched files, all with their own unique ID. RAW conversions are done in ACR/PSCS2, or Bibble if I'm in a hurry on the laptop. About 40% of the panos are shot in RAW, 40% are bracketed JPEG and the remaining 20% are 'single' JPEG. The panoramas go through quite a lot of post-processing in PS using a whole series of actions and AppleScripts.
    I'm expecting my workflow to look something like this:
    1) Download directly into Aperture, possibly with added help from Automator/Applescript when it comes to proper date-based names.
    2) Divide download into a new album for each panorama.
    2a) If it is a people pano there will be quite a lot of duplicate shots for each panohead position - make a stack for each position and choose picks - this bit will speed things up enormously by itself. Reorder stacks to fit correct order of images going around the scene.
    3) Export to TIFF (sometimes JPEG) and stitch using PTMac (sometimes Realviz Stitcher). Oh, and any people who think Aperture is limited, buggy and bad value should go and look at Stitcher - it costs the same, has a far more limited feature set, is on version 5 and by comparison makes Aperture look bug-free.
    4) Bring stitched panorama into Photoshop to adjust seams through layers if needed, flatten, final tone adjustments (usually using shadow/highlight), possibly some colour tweaks, sharpen. For bracketed shots I will blend together the three exposures at this point using a custom action - this kind of thing is unlikely ever to make it to Aperture.
    5) Bring final print-ready file into Aperture for cataloguing/backup.
    5a) If file is too big for Aperture, make a smaller version for cataloguing and store original file in Finder. This gives me a good file for 90% of purposes, with the huge file available with a bit more work.
    Too big? I've found that Aperture gets sluggish with files over 18-20,000 pixels wide, and chokes totally somewhere between 25,000 and 32,000 pixels wide - 'image format unsupported'.
    To summarise - organise and convert in Aperture, stitch in specialist software, do PS-specific stuff then bring final image back in to join the source images.
    Ian

  • Does Compressor 3.5 Conflict With FCE 4 And LiveType?

    Last week my Compressor 3.5 app suddenly refused to open.
    I tried all the usual remedies including deleting it with FCS Remover but to no avail.
    Eventually it was cured by deleting all the FCS 3 apps and reinstalling.
    This morning Compressor once again refused to open with the original "There is a problem . . . " error message.
    Now I realised I had done something an hour before.
    I had just installed FCE 4 and LiveType that comes with it.
    I believe I had also done the same before last week's problem.
    It looks as though there is something about the installing of FCE 4 and/or LiveType that Compressor 3.5 does not like.
    I used FCS 2 together with FCE 4/LT for a couple of years with no apparent conflict.
    I have got everything going again by deleting all the FCS 3 apps and reinstalling . . . . not FCE 4 and LT of course!
    I'm wondering whether it is caused by both of them or just one . . . . maybe LT.
    Perhaps installing FCE 4 and LT before installing FCS 3 would work?
    I could find out by experimenting but I think I've done enough reinstalling!

    Thanks Jon.
    I felt it might be something to do with the older FCE/LT installing outdated shared assets.
    A couple of hours ago I successfully installed LiveType without it affecting FCS 3.
    I installed it on another Mac and then simply copied the application across. I figured that FCS 3 would probably have already installed any "hidden" files LT would need and I seem to have been proved correct.
    I think it will probably work with FCE but I am not feeling quite brave enough today!

  • What's differences gaussian blur in Photoshop and Premiere?

    I would like to ask about the gaussian blur of Photoshop and Premiere.
    Normally, in Photoshop it says pixels in radius, but in Premiere it says only blurriness. Does anybody knows the differences of these two? I used Premiere to apply gaussian filter for our clips, but I want to know the value with pixels in radius.
    Thanks in advance!

    I'm not sure.  But you could probably match it up pretty quickly.
    Blur an image in Premiere with blurriness 50.
    Open the original image and the blurred image in Photoshop, put them together in the same document and set the layer blend mode to "difference".
    Then blur the original with Gaussian Blur and change the radius until it matches Premiere's result (image goes black because the 2 layers are the same).
    My guess is that the numbers have the same meaning, but someone put a really wrong label on it in Premiere.

  • Using PSE 6 and Lightroom together

    I have been a fan of PSE for years and have built up a catalog with over 20k items. I am working more and more in raw format and Lightroom seems to meet my requiremeents well, but, how to use PSE 6 and Lightroom together. what do people do? keep the catalogs in both applications? catalog in PSE and just edit and print in Lightroom? Are Lightroom changes then reflected back in Elements when viewing images?
    thanks for help and suggestions, Olly

    I'd have to disagree slightly with Barbara - for me LR is primarily a RAW processor with a so-so Organising capability. Of course that's only my opinion.
    Having LR and Elements working together is possible but it's really a one way street. The ability to Import an Elements Catalog is a feature of LR but it doesn't work very well. Tagging hierarchies get lost and even Date/Time info can go astray.
    For me I had to start re-importing all my collection manually into LR and re-keyword them. LR is quick at applying keywords - which can also be done during the import process itself.
    What you can do from LR is to open an image in Elements Editor for any creative work. LR creates a TIF version to edit in Elements and then keeps the results in it's library when you close the image.
    My workflow now is to import new shots directly into LR and Keyword and Process them but I also export TIF files which I then have Elements Organise - Elements will pick up LR keywords correctly.
    I just find Elements Organiser is faster and importantly allows you to select specifc images by selecting multiple AND combinations of Tags. LR only uses an OR function. I.e images that have only London AND Bob as opposed to images that have London OR Bob.
    Printing I still do from Photoshop as I find it more controllable - particularly Print Sharpening.
    Colin

  • HOW DO I UNINSTALL PHOTOSHOP AND LIGHTROOM??????

    I HAVE A NEW COMPUTER WITH ADOBE CC INSTALLED.  I WANT TO GIVE MY OLD COMPUTER AWAY, BUT I AM UNABLE TO UNINSTALL PHOTOSHOP AND LIGHTROOM.  I KEEP GETTING THE MESSAGE THAT BRIDGE IS RUNNING.  NO ADOBE APPLICATIONS ARE RUNNING AND I DON'T WANT TO GIVE IT AWAY WITH IT INSTALLED ON THAT COMPUTER.  HOW DO I UNINSTALL???????
    I AM USING THE WINDOWS UNINSTALL!

    Hello kat10sch,
    Thanks for this information.
    I'll give few steps which you can use to uninstall it completely.
    1. First Check in Task Manager if any bridge.exe is running or not if its running please end the task.
         To run task manager - press Ctrl + Alt + Del together and check in process Tab.
    2. Second step you can do a Selective Startup and reboot your machine
          - To do a selective startup please follow http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/run-selective-startup-system-configuration#1TC= windows-7
    Select - Load System Services and Load Startup Items
    3. In the startup Tab of the same windows please uncheck Adobe bridge.
    Restart your machine
    and now you can try Uninstallation as usual from Control panel->Add or Remove (Uninstall a Program)
    If still have any issue let me know
    Thanks

Maybe you are looking for