Photoshop CS6 creates new layers when cropping

when I crop my image CS6 is now creating a layer.  If I check history, there is no sign that a layer was created, just cropped, however if I check under Layer, "Flatten Image" is highlighted.  How do i get rid of this, just started today.

Rufous03,
Is Layer 0 the only layer you see in Layers panel after you crop the image or is there still a 'Background' layer under Layer 0?
In Photoshop CS6, the Crop tool has been refined. There is an option that enables you 'not' to delete cropped pixels when you crop - meaning your image data is not lost - you can go back to the original version at anytime. With this feature enabled (by default, it is - look in the menu bar on top - 'Delete Cropped Pixels' will be unchecked), your 'Background' layer of the image is simply 'Unlocked', therefore leading to 'rename' of layer as 'Layer 0'.
If you enable 'Delete cropped pixels' option, it will simply get rid of the pixel data that you're cropping out and your layer will remain as 'Background'.
Trust this helps.
-ST

Similar Messages

  • Does Photoshop CS6 Extended allows users to crop individual frames?

    Does Photoshop CS6 Extended allows users to crop individual frames? As in just one segment of the video? If so, how is it done?

    Hi there
    The Crop tool in Photoshop functions by cropping the entire image area - however, you can use a Layer Mask to edit an indiviual video or animation frame, as shown below.
    1. Start by importing your video or animation in Photoshop, making sure to convert frames to layers (File > Import > Video Frames To Layers...). Go to your layers panel and select the frame you'd like to crop. Turn on the visibility of the layer by clicking on the small check box to the left of the layer icon - it should turn into an eye as shown below. Then, click the "Add vector mask" icon highlighted below.
    2. Next, select the Rectangular Marquee tool (or use an alternative selection method if you want a different shape) and draw a seelction around the part of your video/animation you want to keep.
    3. Go to Select > Inverse to select the inverse of the area you just selected.
    4. Grab the Paint Bucket Tool and fill the selected area with pure Black (#000000). This will effectively "crop" the layer you have selected. You can see below that the layer underneath my selected layer is now showing through where I filled the selection with black.
    The great thing about using a mask is that you can edit it or delete it altogether if need be. Note though that the area you mask will show up as transparent pixels in your Timeline panel - you can see the layer I edited on the far right of my timeline in the screenshot above.
    Please post again if you need additional help, or if what I demonstrated is not what you were trying to do.
    Cheers!

  • How to create new layers in captivate?

    Hi,
    how to create new layers in captivate's timeline?
    Regards,
    krishnaraj

    Hi krishnaraj
    Sounds like you may be expecting Captivate to work
    identically to Flash. Sorry my friend, it doesn't work this way.
    For starters, notice that Captivate uses slides.
    Each slide has its own timeline. So what you see in the timeline
    area is not for the whole movie.
    As you add objects (Buttons, Click Boxes, Images, Rollover
    Areas, Etc.) the object is placed on the timeline and assumes what
    you are referring to as a layer. You then control which object is
    in front of another object by its relative position in the layer.
    This is called the "Stacking Order".
    Hopefully this helps... Rick

  • "Create new versions when making adjustments" - Lion, Aperture 3.1.3

    I recently upgraded to Lion, and then shortly thereafter to Aperture 3.1.3.
    While I don't seem to share everybody else's issues with Lion nor with Aperture, I do have one of my own.
    In Preferences -> Advanced, I have a box titled "Create new versiont when making adjustment."  It is checked.
    My expectation, (and the way things have always worked under Snow Leopard) is that if I select a master image and begin to make adjustments to it from _any_ feature int he adjustments pallette, that I new version will be created, stacked next to the original, and that the changes I am making will be made to the new version.  This is _not_ what is happening.
    Instead, the changes are applied directly to the master image.  This is annoying, and will probably be fixed in an update...    I thought the work around would be to manually create the version for the time being, until Apple sorts this out.  That didn't work either.
    If I manually create a version, and then proceed to make adjustments to the version, Aperture dows what I would have expected in the first place.  It creates a new version and applies the changes to that.
    For example, I right click on a master image and select "New Version form Master"  A new version, titled "... - Version 2" is created.  When I begin to modify Version 2, a new version is created titled "... - Version 3" and my changes are applied to this version... leaving me with the master and Version 2 which are now duplicates of each other.
    Even more interesting is this:
    Images that were imported into Aperture prior to the Lion upgrade, and the 3.1.3 patch behave as expected, in that a new version is created when adjustments are applied to a master image.
    Images that were imported into Aperture _after_ the upgrade to Lion and the 3.1.3 patch act as describd above, in that no new version is created when adjustments are applied to a master image.
    So...  Here are the questions:
    1. Is anybody else experiencing this?
    2. Does anybody know how to restore the correct behavior?

    Alright,   I have solved the problem.
    Some time ago, I thought it might be neat to import pictures with the Auto Exposure adjustment in place.  What I didn't realize was that if the master image is in the library with adjustments on it, it downs't create a new version when you add additional adjustments.
    As soon as I disabled that, and imported some new imges the probelm went away.
    Also... I went back to the six or seven project that I had imported while use Auto Exposure and removed that adjustment from those images...  
    All is resolved.

  • System should not creates new version when value of PO increased..

    Hi Experts,
    Need your help to solve this problem. When i increase value of PO it should retrigger Release strategy but it creates version first, then i have to tick completion indicator and check then only release strategy retriggers..
    It should not create new version when change po
    Please check below screenshot
    Please help

    Hi
    Please reveiw the following points in note
       - 493900 FAQ: Release Strategy
          4.  Why is the release strategy not determined?
         "If you use version management, the determination of the release
          strategy starts when the version is completed.
          You complete a version by setting the "version completed"
          indicator in the version tab."
       - 662993 Resetting an already occurred release
         You edit a purchasing document with release strategy.
         You change the quantity or the price. In spite of that, the
         already set release is not reset.
    The release strategy works the same with or without version management
    active - the only difference in case - version management is active -
    is that if release is to be reset, it will be reset only on version
    I hope this helsp to clarify this issue
    Kind regards,
    Lorraine

  • Preference to "Create New Versions when making adjustments"

    Isnt the option in Preferences "create new version when making adjustments" seem irrelevant when Ap doesnt touch the original (master) anyway? How is this option intended to be used? Most of the imags for me would be slight tweeks so I wouldnt necessarily want every one of those showing as a 'full new version'.

    yeh, that would seem logical wouldn't it - to create a new version for each session... but that's not what happens.
    i mostly use the HUD and don't close between adjustments but i do sometimes use the side panel which i also don't hide/close between adjustments. i can't remember whether making adjustments via the side panel creates new versions for every adjustment, certainly this behaviour happens when i use the HUD and i'm fairly sure i would have tried the side panel to avoid this annoying behaviour but i can't say for sure and will have to test the side panel behaviour next week if i get time.
    even with the preference for 'create new versions' turned off, there seem to be certain images that always create a new version when i make an adjustment - whether using the HUD or side panel. I haven't figured out an exact pattern to this but it seems to be something to do with those files that have been 'sent to external editor'. subsequent adjustments within aperture always create a new version - haven't a clue why...
    just as an aside, sometimes when i make adjustments (particularly sharpening or noise reduction) i get single pixel wide horizontal lines of noise appearing across my images, which are there when i print or export too, not just screen artifacts due to a badly processed preview...hmmm...anyone else noticed this or has found a post about ways to avoid this?
    all that said, aperture is a godsend for my workflow
    MacBook 2.0 White   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

  • Create new versions when making adjustments?

    Hi,
    What does anyone suggest this setting should be set to? It's on the Advanced Tab in Preferences.
    I think it was un checked when I installed the Trial Version.
    The help file stated the following:-
    +Create new versions when making adjustments” checkbox: Select this checkbox to have Aperture automatically create a new version when you adjust a selected image. The adjustment is applied to the original version and the new one is left untouched.+
    So when I edit an image the the software makes a copy and the original is altered? What happens if it's left un checked?
    Any help on the whole editing thing would be gratefully received.

    This is just a way to automatically create a new version when you make an adjustment. The new version is stacked with an unaltered version, allowing you to quickly see them side by side. What you have to remember is that the *original file is never altered*. This is all virtual. What is called original in this case is in fact an original version, not the actual file. The actual file is called the Master. Very important to understand the distinction.
    I personally leave this off. I never use RAW files without adjustments so there's no point in keeping an unaltered version around, plus it tends to quickly multiply versions and just creates clutter. If I want to see the original file I just hit M (this is the default command key for Show Master). Hit M again and I'm back to my version. If I've created a version and want to do a new different looking one starting from scratch, I can select New Version From Master: presto a new "original"!
    If I've worked on a picture and want to create a BW version, chances are I want to keep the work I've already done as a starting point. In that case I select Duplicate Version and do my BW on the new version. Again, I'm never actually duplicating files and I'm never actually altering pixels, original or otherwise. This is all a set of xml instructions that Aperture applies when it displays the files.
    Helping?
    Message was edited by: Jade Leary

  • Photoshop CS6 a little 'jerky' when moving layers & resizing window (Macbook Pro Retina 650m)

    As title says, when I open Photoshop CS6 and simple make a new layer and either use the type tool, it appears to be a little Sluggish/Jerky when moving the layer around.. The same applies when resizing photoshop itself.
    I'm updated to the latest version of CS6 and have tried all the combinations in the 'Performance' section of Photoshop.
    My Macbook Pro Retina is the 3.4ghz 650m and 8GB RAM offering (OS Mavericks). It's really annoying me as even my old laptop could run it smoothly and that was an i5 and much lower-end graphics card.
    The only way I can really describe it (and i'm no tech professional) is when comparing it to silky smooth 60 fps, it looks like it's skipping frames and in term looking 'jerky'. I also use Illustrator and don't really witness the same problem with it.
    I know this may have been asked quite a bit.. But I've never found the solution.. Could anybody advise me on what it potentially could be down too? (Might I add the laptop has just had a fresh install of the OS and a fresh copy of CS6)

    You could check through the GPU FAQ for anything you might have missed
    http://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/kb/photoshop-cs6-gpu-faq.html
    You say you have tried all settings in Performance, but I wonder what your  cache levels are set at?  If more than 1, then OK.
    There's the general performance FAQ (no doubt lots of overlap)
    http://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/kb/optimize-performance-photoshop-cs4-cs5.html
    Is this with all image docs, or particular ones?  For instance I have been playing with using ACR to process 32bit HDR files, and it puts a huge load on the system.

  • Photoshop CS6: Question about Resolution when Post-Cropping Film Scans

    Hopefully, somebody with more understanding than I on this topic, can help me with this.
    I am about to get a film scanner I have on order, to scan in 35mm negatives. I've had one before but I had problems with the model and had to return it.
    When scanning film frames, I like the idea of setting the scan area marquee, at the scanning stage, so that it scans slightly beyond the film frame edges, so that I can carefully crop to the edge of the film frame later, in Photoshop CS6, rather than setting it, at the scanning stage, and then later, when examining the film frame in CS6, maybe discovering that I have not scanned to the edge of the film frame quite enough, as I can easily zoom right into the image when in CS6, to carefully examine where the film frame edges are.
    My concern about doing it like this, though, is that I may be reducing the resolution of the image. For example, say I scan a film frame in at 3600ppi, and later crop the image slightly in CS6 in order to precisely trim off any slight amount of black around the film frame edges. By cropping the film frame like this in CS6, am I reducing the image resolution of the film frame to lower than 3600ppi? As I best understand it, I do not think post-cropping like this results in any reduction in image resolution, but am I correct in thinking this?

    Hi.
    The scanner is a Reflecta ProScan 7200. As I said to station_two, I am in London. I understand the brand is known as 'Pacific Image' over in the US.
    The scanning software I will be using it with will be 'SilverFast Ai Studio 8'.
    Do take a look at this excellent review of the scanner:
    http://www.filmscanner.info/en/ReflectaProScan7200.html
    (I may be incorrectly assuming too much when on these forums that I am speaking exclusively with folk from the US - the way you spell 'labour' makes me think you are not from the US?)

  • Photoshop CS6 "Auto-blend Layers" leaves non-editable artifacts.

    In Photoshop CS6, I created two TIFF files each having a different focus on the same subject. The intent is to create a single file using focus stacking with all subject elements in focus. The methods used to import the files as layers and align the layers do not create any artifacts.
    The "Auto-blend Layer" function, however, creates permanent artifacts on the layers when creating the masks. The function creates masks for each layer based on its own logic for determining what is best focus. The analysis is fairly good where high contrast exists however it is not 100 percent accurate and is fairly inaccurate in low to medium contrast images. In trying to edit the masks and even when you disable or delete the masks artifacts are left along the margins of the masks on the layer itself. This is a bug. No matter what occurs with the mask the underlying layer should be inviolate - at no time should the underlying layer be affected by a mask until the mask is applied. When the masks are disabled or deleted the remaining layer should not display any evidence of the borders of the mask. (Photoshop 13.0.0 64x Extended; color space= ProPhoto RGB; 32bit TIFF files; 16bit PSD)

    In Photoshop CS6, I created two TIFF files each having a different focus on the same subject. The intent is to create a single file using focus stacking with all subject elements in focus. The methods used to import the files as layers and align the layers do not create any artifacts.
    The "Auto-blend Layer" function, however, creates permanent artifacts on the layers when creating the masks. The function creates masks for each layer based on its own logic for determining what is best focus. The analysis is fairly good where high contrast exists however it is not 100 percent accurate and is fairly inaccurate in low to medium contrast images. In trying to edit the masks and even when you disable or delete the masks artifacts are left along the margins of the masks on the layer itself. This is a bug. No matter what occurs with the mask the underlying layer should be inviolate - at no time should the underlying layer be affected by a mask until the mask is applied. When the masks are disabled or deleted the remaining layer should not display any evidence of the borders of the mask. (Photoshop 13.0.0 64x Extended; color space= ProPhoto RGB; 32bit TIFF files; 16bit PSD)

  • Photoshop CS6 continually shuts down when I save a file I am working on. Any ideas how to fix this?

    Photoshop CS6 continually shuts down on me when I go to save a file I am working on. I work primarily in this software, and this continual shut down happens at least 10+ times a day. Any ideas on how to fix this would be greatly appreciated!

    Does that happen with that file only or with any other files as well?
    Did you try to create a new file and save it?
    What error message do you get? Please attach an error screenshot.
    Which operating system do you use?
    Since when are you facing this issue? Did it ever work before?
    What changes did you make after which you are facing this issue?
    ~ Arpit

  • Photoshop CS6 automatic shape layers?

    In Photoshop CS6, I have Shape Layer B clipped (ctrl alt G) by Shape Layer A. SL-B has a color fill different from SL-A, and has 50% opacity. Is there a way to automatically make every new Shape Layer drawn to have the same transparency and fill color as SH-B, and should also be clipped by SH-A?
    When I select SL-A and then draw a new shape layer, it copies the fill color of SL-A and is clipped automatically. When I select SL-B and then draw a new shape layere, the new layer copies SL-B's fill color, but not the transparency, and it is also not clipped.

    Play with the manipulator keys (shift, ctrl,alt) or use the boolean icon in the top tool bar. This would allow you to add or subtract from the same layer. Making it possible to have more than one shape on the same layer.
    Just a thought...

  • Adobe Photoshop CS6 has stopped working - when printing

    I get the message “Adobe Photoshop CS6 has stopped working” regularly when I try to print a Photoshop document.  I end up having to recreate the document which usually then prints even though I have just dragged the layers across.  How can I resolve this?

    Hi there! Because the forum you originally posted in is for beginners trying to learn the basics of Photoshop, I moved your question to the Photoshop General Discussion forum, where you'll get more specialized help.

  • Unable to reinstall Bridge CS6 or Photoshop CS6 on new iMac - Unable to find Uninstall anywhere in Library or Utilities

    I just purchased a new iMac.  Our previous iMac finally "died" and we had to have the data recovered from hard drive and transferred to the new iMac.  I am now unable to open Bridge CS6 or Photorshop CS6.  Message says I need to reinstall.  But when going to Utilities, am unable to find Adobe Installer or Uninstall in any files or folders.  Anxious  to get back to using Bridge and Photoshop - HELP - and Thanks!!

    lgoss wrote:
    …when going to Utilities, am unable to find Adobe Installer or Uninstall in any files or folders…
    No, you're never going to find it there. 
    In CS6, the Adobe uninstaller is inside the Adobe Photoshop CS6 folder, which in turn is inside the Root Applications folder.

  • Photoshop CS6: Screen flickers black when using brush tool on MBP 2013

    I'm experiencing a flickering black box whenever using large brush sizes on Photoshop CS6 using a Macbook Pro (16GB RAM, 2.8 GHz i7, Intel Iris, Late 2013 13") similar to what is shown on: black flickering boxes on Vimeo.  The issue stops if you: Preferences -> Performance -> Uncheck "Use Graphics Processor" and restart the program or backrev to CS6 13.0.0 (or anything before 13.0.4). 
    I've attempted uninstalling/reinstalling CS6, resetting NVRAM and SMC, and verified the system is all up-to-date.  When booting in Safe Mode the issue is also resolved (as it appears Graphics Processor is disabled).  There appears to have been a similar issue on the 2013 Macbook Air that Apple released a fix for (MacBook Air (Mid 2013) Software Update 1.0) but I do not see anything regarding the Macbook Pro line.  Anyone experience/resolve this issue?
    I've contacted Apple Care multiple times and they say it is an Adobe issue.  And Adobe is insisting is a CPU/GPU driver issue just like the Macbook Air issue Apple already fixed.

    You may be able to get a display driver update from the laptop manufacturer.
    Unfortunately, if none of the workarounds is circumventing the problem for you, and there are no display driver updates that solve the problem, you may want to escalate it to the laptop maker.  They in turn can push through a new display driver update.  They should take responsibility for making your system work with modern, professional software.
    -Noel

Maybe you are looking for

  • SELECT-OPTIONS in a "Get_Persistent_by_QUERY".

    Hi Experts, I am using a SELECT-OPTIONS in the method: "Get Persistent by Query". But I have an error. This is my code below. SELECT-OPTIONS so_date     FOR    sy-datum                      . DATA lo_query_manager TYPE REF TO if_os_query_manager     

  • Moving iTunes Folder

    I moved all of the iTunes folder from one disk (that was full) to another thinking that I would just repoint iTunes to the new disk through the iTunes - Preferences - Advanced - iTunes Music Location option. That does not work. My iTunes does not sho

  • G4DVD-RAM drive with  MAC PRO?

    I have an old g4 tower laying around, only because it has a DVD-RAM drive and I have tons of old files stored on those 2000 DVD-RAM cassettes (encased in plastic). Is it possible to install this drive into my new 2009 Mac Pro 8 core in the second sup

  • Failed update Photoshop CS6 & Extension Manager

    Trying to get some help with failed upgrade to Photoshop CS6 13.0.6 Done with errors error message U44M1P6 also Extension Manager 6.0.8 update Installation failed with errors  Error code U44M1P7

  • Different query view format not shown

    Dear Gurus,   I am kinda new to WAD; Here I made 2 different query views(Different format) and used 'Query View Selection' in WAD. But somehow, when i choose different query views from the drop down list, the format of the result all seem to be the s