Photoshop not seeing export color space setting in Lightroom 4

MY LR or PS programs are not acting as expected.
When my Lightroom 4 is set to export to Photoshop in either the sRGB color space or the AdobeRGB color space, and Photoshop is set for the sRGB space, Photoshop gives a color mismatch error in both cases, saying the image is an AdobeRGB embedded image. However, if the color space in PS is set for AdobeRGB, even if the export setting in Lightroom is sRGB, there is no mismatch error.
Apparently, PS sees every image as embedded with AdobeRGB.
I have a Sony NEX6 camera. I have taken pictures in the camera sRGB color space and the AdobeRGB space, which I used for this test. Since I shoot in RAW, this should not matter, so I don’t think it is the issue, and, in fact, I get the same result no matter which color space the camera is in.
If LR export and PS color space are the same, why should there be a mismatch, and why is PS not seeing the sRGB space? Might there be a setting in Lightroom or Photoshop that I am missing?

howdego wrote:
I am, however, trying to decide on the right color space to use, which is how I noticed this problem. I rarely make prints of my photos. I make bluray movies using Proshow Producer. I recently got a new monitor and Samsung LED HDTV, and found that my photo videos did not display right and I am trying to find out why. I found the normal viewing settings of the TV have too much color and sharpness, so I established another group of settings for photos, which helped. However, I am still not satisfied.
These are two separate but related issues.
1) It's almost impossible to get accurate Color and Luminance level rendering inside LR if you don't use a hardware monitor calibrator to adjust your computer monitor.
2) LCD TV's use settings to "enhance" color, brightness, and contrast that is usually very, very inacuuarte. But this is what most non-photography people seem to like so TV manufacturers crank up the "default settings." I also have an older 52" Samsung TV (LN-T5265F) that I've manually adjusted for more accurate color. Try using the 'Movie' mode, which is the most accurate mode and turn the Backlight setting down. Here are the settings I use with my Samsung TV. I assume your Samsung TV's controls are similar:
Setup Screens
HDMI 1 (Cable Box) & Coax (Cable)
HDMI 2 (Panasonic Blu-Ray Player)
PICTURE - 1
Movie
Standard
Dynamic
Movie
Standard
Dynamic
Contrast
82
82
82
82
82
82
Brightness
43
45
45
43
45
45
Sharpness
25
25
35
15
15
25
Color
42
45
45
44
45
45
Tint
77 R
77 R
84 R
77 R
77 R
84 R
Backlight
5
6
7
5
5
6
PICTURE - 2
Color Tone
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Detailed Settings
Black Adjust
Off
NA
NA
Off
NA
NA
Dynamic Contrast
Low
NA
NA
Low
NA
NA
Gamma
-1
NA
NA
-1
NA
NA
Color Space
Auto
NA
NA
Auto
NA
NA
White Balance
R-Offset
13
NA
NA
13
NA
NA
G-Offset
15
NA
NA
15
NA
NA
B-Offset
17
NA
NA
17
NA
NA
R-Gain
15
NA
NA
15
NA
NA
G-Gain
12
NA
NA
12
NA
NA
B-Gain
17
NA
NA
17
NA
NA
My Color Control
Pink
15
NA
NA
15
NA
NA
Green
15
NA
NA
15
NA
NA
Blue
15
NA
NA
15
NA
NA
White
15
NA
NA
15
NA
NA
Edge Ehnacement
On
NA
NA
On
NA
NA
xvYCC
Off
NA
NA
Off
NA
NA
Digital NR
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Active Color
Off(NA)
Off(NA)
Off
Off(NA)
Off(NA)
Off
Dnie
Off(NA)
Off
Off
Off(NA)
Off
Off
SETUP - Screen 2
Energy Saving
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
SETUP - Screen 3
HDMI Black Level
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Film Mode
Off(NA)
Off(NA)
Off(NA)
Off(NA)
Off(NA)
Off(NA)
howdego wrote:
So it occurred to me that some colors might be wrong, or too saturated, because I am not seeing them on my monitor as they will appear on the HDTV. I am thinking that since sRGB is my final color space, I would try to do everything in the sRGB space, including setting my monitor to sRGB (I have a Dell 2413 which supports adobeRGB too). I was inn the process of trying this when I found the issue at hand. Might you have any thoughts about this color space choice
If you have a wide-gamut monitor you are better off using it in Adobe RGB mode with a monitor calibrator. But then the monitor will not look correct in non-color managed applications:
http://www.gballard.net/photoshop/srgb_wide_gamut.html
You can circumvent this issue by using your monitor in sRGB mode, but I'd still suggest you use a hardware monitor calibrator. Either way it is imortatnt that you have a proper monitor profile assigned in Windows or OS X Color Management. The monitor manufacturer provides these, but they don't always work well with LR for numerous reasons.
To insure the best image quality you should do all of your editing in PS using 16 bit TIFF with ProPhoto RGB profile format until you are ready to Export. For use with ProShow you can use TIFFs or JPEGs, but use sRGB color profile to avoid any color management issue. JPEGs are fine and a LR Quality higher than 80 (10 in PS) is a waste of disk space for slideshow images.
In short you've got a lot of "variables" between the uncalibrated monitor and out-of-the-box non-adjusted TV. The former requires a good hardware calibrator aad the latter a good "eye" to adjust it.

Similar Messages

Photoshop Elements 12 does not support the color space

I recently installed Photoshop 12 on my computer after a reformat. I was previously using Elements 10. i am not getting this error when trying to import photos from my camera. Photoshop Elements does not support the color space. I am using a Nikon D3200 camera to download from. I never had this problem with Elements 10 using the same camera. How do I fix this?

It turns out that this problem went away after the program crashed. Everything seems to be working well now.

Export Color Space, etc?

I'm a couple of days into a trial of Fireworks and I got it
only for two reasons: First to be able to create navigation bars
with popup menus on some of the menu options and second, to more
easily create photo galleries for my web site. (I'm quite
comfortable with PhotoShop and creating web-optimized images.)
Anyway, I've run into a couple of things that have got me
stumped...
If I use FW CS3 to optimize a JPG image for the web (either
from directly within FW or via the Create Web Photo Album command
from within Dreamweaver CS3) the resulting images no longer have a
color space embedded. And I can't find out how to embed one. The
original JPG images were created in PS CS3 and had the sRBG color
space embedded and the colors displayed as expected in a web
browser. The resulting "optimized" images no
longer have a color space embedded and the colors appear quite off.
This might be acceptable with some vector graphics or logos but
it's not acceptable with photgraphs, especially for a photography
web site.
(It's quite well-known, at least in photography circles that
for proper display of the colors, images designed for the web
should be in sRGB with that space embedded, as that is what web
browsers are optimized for. Anything else, including not embedding
a color space results in colors that are "off".)
A related issue is that when using the Create Web Photo Album
from within DW CS3 the resulting files all have a new suffix of
"_jpg" added to the name. Meaning that my
original "name.jpg" gets named
"name_jpg.jpg". I really don't like that, and
can't find how to turn it off.
(I went to a large bookstore to buy a FW book today but they
didn't have any. And the only one they even listed on their
computer is due to be published at the end of February!)
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Eldor - Montreal

quote:
Originally posted by:
Newsgroup User
EldorG wrote:
> As I said, PEBCAK error. But that still leaves me
with the file name 'problem'
> I mentioned... that my images get named from
'name.jpg' to 'name_jpg.jpg'.
> This happens when I use the 'Create Web Photo Album'
from Dreamweaver CS3
> (which in turn calls FW to do the work). Should I
post that in the DW forum,
> or is it a FW thing? Thanks very much! Eldor
Don't name them in FW. Allow them to be exported with the
names they
already have.
Linda Rathgeber [PVII] *Adobe Community Expert-Fireworks*
http://www.projectseven.com
Fireworks Newsgroup:
news://forums.projectseven.com/fireworks/
CSS Newsgroup: news://forums.projectseven.com/css/
http://www.adobe.com/communities/experts/
Linda, I'm
not naming the images in FW. As a matter of fact, I never
even see a FW dialog. If I optimize an image directly from within
FW, there is no problem. But doing so from Dreamweaver (through the
Create Web Photo Album command which seems to call FW to automate
the work) causes the images to be reduntantly renamed. And I don't
see an option anywhere to change this.
As I said, I'm not sure if this is something I should be
asking in the FW forum or the DW forum. But since this option
doesn't even exist in DW until FW is installed and FW is called
from DW to do this, I really don't know where to ask.
How does that FW automation work? Is there a script file or
something somewhere that I might find and modify?
That option in DW not only optimizes a bunch of images, it
creates thumbnails as well, and writes all the stuff into HTML code
to produce a table of the images. So I can't just go to FW and
manually optimize an image.
Regards...
Eldor

Correct export color space for wide gamut monitors.

Running a photography studio I have 4 typical scenarios of how clients or end users will see my photo work. I create and edit the photos using LR 3 on a HP 2475w (wide gamut) monitor. I'm aware that there are color shifts, but trying to figure out which export color space to use to be most consistent.
A) Wide Gamut monitor using color managed software or browser such as Firefox.
B) Wide Gamut monitor NOT using color managed software such as IE 8.
C) Standard monitor using color managed software or browser such as Firefox.
D) Standard monitor NOT using color managed software such as IE 8.
A) gives the best results and that's what I run myself. No matter the color space that I export (sRGB, aRGB, or my custom calibrated ICC) the images appear to be correct 100%
B) gives mixed results...the hosting site for my photos seems to oversaturate a bit when I view the photos in their preview size which is what my clients see, when I view the original photo in full resolution (this feature disabled for my clients to avoid them downloading full rez copies of images), then the images appears a bit dull (70%). When I try this same scenario using aRGB export, it looks better (90-95%). When I export it using my monitor profile then the photo is spot on 100% however my monitor profile shows the photo incorrectly when viewing it using the standard Windows Vista photo viewer, it appears lighter and less saturated which I guess I expect since it's not color managed.
C) On a standard monitor the photos all look the same regardless of color space export so long as I use a color managed browser such as Firefox.
D) This gives pretty much the same breakdown of results as scenario B above. At the moment, it appears that when I use my custom ICC profile which is the calibration of my monitor...I get the best web results.
However my custom ICC profile gives me the worst local results within my windows viewer and when my clients load the photos on their machines, no doubt they will look just as bad on theirs regardless of which monitor they use. So aRGB seems to be the best choice for output. Anyone else do this? It's significantly better when viewing in IE on both Wide Gamut and Standard LCD's when compared to sRGB.
I would guess that my typical client has a laptop with Windows and they will both view the photos locally and upload them on the web, so it needs to look as close to what it looks like when I'm processing it in LR and Photoshop as possible. I know that a lot of people ask questions about their photos being off because they don't understand that there's a shift between WG and non-WG monitors, but I get that there's a difference...question is which color space export has worked best for others.

I am saying that since images on the internet are with extremely few
exceptions targeted towards sRGB. It is extremely common for those images to
not contain ICC profiles even if they really are sRGB. If they do not
contain ICC profiles in the default mode in Firefox, Firefox (as well as
Safari btw, another color managed browser), will not convert to the monitor
profile but will send the image straight to the monitor. This means that on
a wide gamut display, the colors will look oversaturated. You've no doubt
seen this on your display, but perhaps you've gotten used to it. If you
enable the "1" color management mode, Firefox will translate every image to
the monitor profile. This will make the colors on your display more
realistic and more predictable (since your monitor's very specific
properties no longer interfere and the image's colors are displayed as they
really are) for many sites including many photographic ones. This is most
important on a wide gamut display and not that big of a deal on a standard
monitor, which usually is closer to sRGB.
It seems you are suggesting that for a wide-gamut display it is better to
try using your own monitor's calibration profile on everything out there,
assuming on images posted with a wider gamat it will get you more color
range while there would be nothing lost for images posted in sRGB.
Indeed. The point of color management is to make the specific
characteristics of your monitor not a factor anymore and to make sure that
you see the correct color as described in the working space (almost always
sRGB on the web). This only breaks down when the color to be displayed is
outside of the monitor's gamut. In that case the color will typically get
clipped to the monitor's gamut. The other way around, if your original is in
sRGB and your monitor is closer to adobeRGB, the file's color space is
limiting. For your monitor, you want to make the system (Firefox in this
case) assume that untagged files are in sRGB as that is what the entire
world works in and translate those to the monitor profile. When you
encounter adobeRGB or wider files (extremely rare but does happen), it will
do the right thing and translate from that color space to the monitor
profile.
Wide gamut displays are great but you have to know what you are doing. For
almost everybody, even photographers a standard gamut monitor is often a
better choice. One thing is that you should not use unmanaged browsers on
wide gamut displays as your colors will be completely out of whack even on
calibrated monitors. This limits you to Firefox and Safari. Firefox has the
secret option to enable color management for every image. Safari doesn't
have this. There is one remaining problem, which is flash content on
websites. Flash does not color manage by default and a lot of flash content
will look very garish on your wide gamut display. This includes a lot of
photographer's websites.

The Organizer does not support the color space in the file

I just purchased and installed PSE 8 as an upgrade to PSE 6. My catalog correctly shows all of my existing images. However, when I try to import photos into the Organizer, I get a message that nothing was imported. The reason given is that "The Organizer does not support the color space in the file." This happens with photos taken on my iPhone as well as those from my Canon PowerShot A1100 IS. Any suggestions?
Here is my system information:
Elements Organizer 8.0.0.0
Core Version: 8.0 (20090905.r.605812)
Language Version: 8.0 (20090905.r.605812)
Current Catalog:
Catalog Name: My Catalog
Catalog Location: C:/Documents and Settings/All Users/Application Data/Adobe/Elements Organizer/Catalogs/My Catalog
Catalog Size: 83.9MB
Catalog Cache Size: 459.8MB
System:
Operating System Name: XP
Operating System Version: 5.1 Service Pack 3
System Architecture: AMD CPU Family:15 Model:11 Stepping:1 with MMX, SSE Integer, SSE FP
Built-in Memory: 2GB
Free Memory: 829MB
Important Drivers / Plug-ins / Libraries:
Microsoft DirectX Version: 9.0
Apple QuickTime Version: 7.65
Adobe Reader Version: 9.2
Adobe Acrobat Version: Not installed
CD and DVD drives:
J: (SONY DVD BUS: 3 ID: 3 Firmware: RW)

It turns out that this problem went away after the program crashed. Everything seems to be working well now.

Asking the Bridge Team: Bridge "working color space" setting when one does not have the Suite?

Common sense tells me there is really no such thing as a
"working color space" in Bridge, because
Bridge is not an image editor, just a browser
Therefore, this may turn out to be a purely academic question; but that doesn't keep my curiosity from forcing me to ask it anyway. ;)
Is there a way to set the Bridge
"color settings" when one does not have the suite?
The only Adobe program I keep up to date is Photoshop, so I've never had the suite. My version of Photoshop is 11 (CS4) and I run updated
(not upgraded) versions of Adobe Acrobat 7.x, Illustrator 10.x and InDesign 2.x. Consequently, the Synchronize color settings command is not available to me.
It seems to me that Bridge is behaving like a proper color-managed browser (e.g. Firefox with color management enabled), in that it displays tagged image files correctly and assumes sRGB for untagged image files. This normally works fine.
But what if I wanted Bridge to assume my
Photoshop color working space for untagged images
so that it behaves the same as Photoshop? I'm just curious, as I deal with a minuscule, practically negligible amount of untagged files.
My reason for bringing it up now is that I don't recall this being explicitly mentioned in forum replies when users inquire about color settings in Bridge. A recent post regarding Version Cue in the Photoshop Macintosh forum got me thinking about this. Just wanting to make sure that I'm right in my assumption that
there is really no such thing as a
"working color space" in Bridge, because Bridge is not an image editor, just a browser.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Ramón,
Thanks for sharing the outcome of your tests. However, I may have found a bug/exception to Bridge's colour management policy!
It appears that CMYK EPS photoshop files are not colour managed in Adobe Bridge, even if they contain an embedded ICC profile.
I've tried every combination in the EPS 'Save As' dialogue box, so it doesn't seem to be an issue with file encoding. Also, Bridge doesn't rely on the low-res preview that is held within the EPS itself.
My guess is that Bridge is previewing the CMYK EPS with a Bridge-generated RGB image, but it's being displayed as monitor RGB (assigned) rather than colour managed (converted to monitor RGB). For most users the difference will be barely perceptible, but the problem became very noticeable when using Bridge to preview Newsprint CMYK images on a wide-gamut monitor (images that should have appeared muted really leapt off the screen!).
How do I report this to the Colour Police at Adobe?!?

Photoshop not seeing lens model in exif data from A3 export

Hi, I am trying to use the lens correction features in CS5 but the lens type can't be read in the exif data of an image I've exported from A3. It sees the focal length and body type. The lens type is listed in the Metadata Inspector in A3. I took the image into iPhoto and checked "extended photo info" and the lens type isn't there either. This happens with at least 2 lenses. One prime and one zoom. Any ideas?

Hi again
Having played with metadata a bit more, it is possible to include EXIF data for the lens size etc.. eg...EF300mm f2.8L IS USM But it doesn't append the manufacturer's name, eg I use Canon, yet 'Canon' is not appended to the Lens data like it is to the camera name..
In the library Inspector click > Metadata > where it says 'General' click the down arrow, then click > Edit > from the window that appears click > EXIF > from the drop down list click > Lens (scroll down a bit)
The lens you used will now be appended to your data.
I have not tried exporting this to Photoshop so maybe you could post back if its possible to export this data to PS or not.
Maybe someone has information on this and can chip in here with advice....
Hope this is helpful....... Gerry....
PS to all reading this, I also noticed while playing around with this ( I have not delved into metadata too much since Ap2) that all my personal details like mobile number, address, email etc are all appended by default, I imagine my address book info has been used here.
A useful feature indeed while selling photo's, or if you intend it to be there..... but not so good if you are not aware it's there in the first place.....!
Just a shared thought to whom it may concern....... Gerry.
Message was edited by: windhoveruk

PS CS with color space set to Prophoto RGB - will ACR change embedded profiles?

Probably a foolish question but my problem is that I have a mixture of files:
My own files (all initially RAW (NEF) which I import into ACR as 16 bit Prophoto RGB ).
Files from family members and from slide scanning performed elsewhere - they are in 2 groups:
The first of these from elsewhere acquired files were all JPEGs that I converted to Tiffs in Bridge before setting out to edit them-- all unfortunately 8bit and sRGB.
The scanned files were scanned as tiffs but also 8bit and sRGB.
My normal procedure is that I in ACR I have set the files to 16 bit and Prophoto RGB. In PS the same but also to preserve embedded profiles. I have the impression that working with the "foreign" files in 16 bit does give me more room for editing but that I should continue with the embedded profiles.
Is there a way to ensure that the color profiles are not changed in ACR even if the line in the middle below says 16 bit Prophoto RGB (I have PS CS5). I would hate to have to change this line each time I view a file in ACR. I would hate more to loose the editing facilities in ACR as these acquired files do need som special care before they are mixed with my own in our family albums. I prefer the 16 bit Prophoto RGB option for my own files as I like to play with them - i.e. apart from including them in Photo Albums.
I do see that a logical way is to process all the acquired files before going to my own files but it is so much more practical for me to work with a mixture of the files sorted chronologically - a year or month at the time.
I would even consider getting an upgrade to CS6 if this version could help me.
Can someone enligthen me?
Thanks, Git

Hi, Tom.
The real issue here is getting accurate color. You can't get accurate color by setting your monitor profile to sRGB. sRGB is a virtual color space that doesn't describe the exact color gamut of any physical device. But, in order to display sRGB or any color space accurately, you need to get a characterization of your monitor.
Here is an AWESOME way to get access to a colorimeter: http://www.lensrentals.com/rent/pantone-huey-colorimeter Looks like for $32 you can rent this for a week. Go in on this with a friend and profile both of your monitors and hardly pay a thing. If you have a reasonably good quality LCD monitor, this custom profile you make will be fairly accurate for many months. At the very least, this is way more accurate than having no regular calibration at all.
Hope this helps!
Bret

Send to - Final Cut Pro XML data not seeing my Color render

Sup folks,
As always I did some lurking on these boards and consulted the manual about this issue.
Nada.
I've rendered my shots. They were all queued. They were all rendered.
When I use the Send to -> Final Cut Pro command I get the "not all your clips were rendered" warning. I click yes to see what I will get.
FCP imports the XML data and I get nothing. All of the clips in my FCP timeline generated through the Send to -> Final Cut Pro command are all of my original media prior to my color workflow. Not my graded Color renders.
I did move my renders from a local drive to an external because of data capacity. After doing so I did update my Media, Render and Project paths to the new location of my media.
I thought that would fix my problem. It didnt.
So again: my issue is that even with my shots all rendered correctly (i checked them in QT) the XML being sent to FCP through the Send to -> Final Cut Pro command is not hooking up with my renders.
Deadline tomorrow.
As always,thanks for your time

I did move my renders from a local drive to an external because of data capacity. After doing so I did >update my Media, Render and Project paths to the new location of my media.
If I'm following the sequence correctly, you rendered your material to a local drive. Then you moved it, changed the paths (in COLOR), and then tried to "Send to... FCP". Is this correct? If so, doomed to failure. In your case, you may have even moved an empty folder.
There is an ironclad and non-negotiable series of events in rendering and initiating the roundtrip. Many users regard this as a "bug". One of the first things that a user should always do is set up all the target paths before even doing the first grade. But it is essential that the target render path be set up PRIOR to loading the Render Queue. COLOR creates the receiving folder at that time, and that is where the media will go no matter what you do after the RenderQueue is loaded. Change the path, change the format... change whatever you want... the deal has been done, and all will be ignored. However, once the media is rendered and you choose Send To... FCP, then the original XML that FCP sent will be modified by COLOR and passed back to Final Cut. COLOR does NOT,repeat, NOT generate EDLs, XMLs, or any of that stuff. It only modifies original lists. That you modified the Media, Render and Project paths (probably only in the User Preferences tab) is meaningless once the project has been rendered. The Render path for this individual project is determined in the Project Settings pane, along with the render dimensions and format. However, COLOR will observe a path change AFTER the render, and edits the XML re-export to try to find the media in the newly named directory. Of course, your media is actually elsewhere, and you get a blank sequence.
Lastly, make sure that you SAVE the project after renders, to retain the "rendered" clip status -- or COLOR won't remember any of this.
jPo

I am not seeing export to Excel option in SharePoint 2013 survey (even in the overview view mode)

Hi
If anyone could point me in the right direction as to what steps to take to enable the export to excel option in a sharePoint survey list.
all other surveys are showing up that export to excel option.
I am not seeing the view dropdown as well which shows up on right (the only way to create new view is through the URL as of now)
Constraints
Survey already has several responses now so making a new survey is not an option
(I know that when is any custom view is changed to default view and if Overview is made as the default view again this option goes away, but how to get this export to excel option back?)
Steps taken till now
Checked in SP designer as to which field is set to default and it shows overview as the default.
Checked whether any web part was closed and it seems there was none else closed web part category would've shown up
Saved the existing survey as template both with the content included and without the content (without the content template has the export to excel option showing up)
Many thanks ,
Ab

Aby,
Do following, it will work
Create a simple list and hit export to excel to create owssvr.iqy file
Open that file in notepad
Collect Survey list' GUID and View GUID from SPD. You need to change the pointer to test list to survey
Change list GUID and view Guid
File will contain these code
WEB
1
https://mycomp.sharepoint.com/sites/RND/_vti_bin/owssvr.dll?XMLDATA=1&List={577F5EF1-DA61-4BAD-B912-E16CEFD72AE2}&View={05CF5C6B-92F0-4681-BC4A-F60E2646A41D}&RowLimit=0&RootFolder=%2fsites%2fRND%2fReports%20List
Selection={9CC32EE5-7C16-49EE-9BA1-136C1ADBEBEF}-{2D172036-F4BF-459D-BBAB-4FEE3310511D}
EditWebPage=
Formatting=None
PreFormattedTextToColumns=True
ConsecutiveDelimitersAsOne=True
SingleBlockTextImport=False
DisableDateRecognition=False
DisableRedirections=False
SharePointApplication=https://mycomp.sharepoint.com/sites/RND/_vti_bin
SharePointListView={05CF5C6B-92F0-4681-BC4A-F60E2646A41D}
SharePointListName={577F5EF1-DA61-4BAD-B912-E16CEFD72AE2}
RootFolder=/sites/RND/Reports List
It will work :)
Please 'propose as answer' if it helped you, also 'vote helpful' if you like this reply.

Color space setting won't hold

My display setting for the color space won’t hold. I’ll set sRGB (Control panel/Display/Change display settings/Advance settings/Monitor Color) close the dialogue and all is well for a nonspecific period of time. At some point the sRGB setting will deselect. I’ll reset it but the cycle goes on and on. Has anyone had this experience or know the whys and wherefores?
System: W701; Windows 7 64; Quadro FX 2800M; hueyPRO
Many Thanks,
Fred
Solved!
Go to Solution.

I had a similar problem with my T410, using Windows 7's Calibrate Display under Color Management in Control Panel and I found two critical issues with keeping color calibrations (profiles) active. The first involves setting Windows up to use the profile and the second involves preventing the graphic card's applications from resetting and loosing the color calibration.
First, in order to get Windows 7 to use your color profile, it must be associated with your display in Color Management under the Devices tab. Also, two check boxes must be checked; the first being Use my settings for this device on the Devices tab and the second is Use Windows display calibration on the Advanced tab. This second check box will remain grayed out until you click Change System Defaults and then clicking the Advanced tab.
It is my understanding that color profiles generated by display calibrators can be loaded and handled by Windows in lieu of the third-party loaders. The following link will shed more light on this use of Windows to load the profiles:
http://www.pusztaiphoto.com/articles/colormgmt/win7/default.aspx
Secondly, the graphics card's user interface modules seem to constantly re-set the video card thereby loosing the color calibrations. These may be disabled under the Startup tab in MSCONFIG. On my machine, I disabled three Intel® Common User Interface items: igfxtray.exe, hkcmd.exe and igfxpers.exe. The following links may shed some more light on this:
http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/topic371918.html
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-desktop/color-profile-switches-when-compu...
ThinkPad T410, Model #: 2516-CTO/ i7-620M 2.66 GHz, 4 MB L3, Win 7 Pro 64 bit
4 GB PC3-8500 1067 MHz 2 DIMM, Intel GMA 5700MHD – AMT, 500 GB HDD 7200 rpm
DVD Recordable 8x Max Dual Layer, Ultrabay Slim (Serial ATA)

Color space setting for new monitor?

New HP LP2480 monitor.
Has multiple settings for colorspace.
For use with FCS- should I be at adobeRGB or Rec 601 or Rec 709?
(Prior to this I used a Apple display and never messed with settings)
Thanks

Does anyone know the color space used in FCP?
Avid is 601
but I think might FCP might be 701 or RGB- yes? no?

How can I see which color space a picture is in in LR5

I don't want to open the pics in Bridge or in Photoshop, but I want to see this information in LR5

If the image is a camera JPG, then many cameras substitute an underscore for the first character of the filename (this is I think in the standards of the digital camera manufacturer's association) when the camera is set to AdobeRGB. This is not present when pictures are taken with the camera set to SRGB.
This information is not relevant for camera Raw, but at least some cameras will in fact repeat this same naming convention, for those as well.
I don't recall that this information is readily accessible, for derived files which have been assigned a colourspace when created for external editing. It is possible to make external editing presets, but IIRC the standard file suffix (such as, "XXXXX-edit.XXX") is not set separately by these. In the case where a file is sent to Photoshop in an as yet unsaved state, one could when saving it, modify the file name to denote the colourspace.
However, I am not sure how useful that would be from the LR end.
If you would have liked a file to be in a big colourspace, but it has previously been saved in a small colourspace, then there's little you can now do about that. If you would have liked it to be in a small colourspace - you simply select that when exporting.
You simply don't need to bother about a file's colourspace or bit depth otherwise. LR takes care of making best use, of whatever is there.

Photoshop not printing in color

I have photoshop cs4 and i'm trying to print to a Toshiba 6520c color copier. I set it to print in color but it only prints black and white. All the other cs4 products will print in color. Has anyone else run across this problem. photoshop will print to our other color copier just fine (its a konica minolta bizhub). I'm thinking it may be a communication issue with photoship and the toshiba print driver.
Thank You.

mfctoday wrote:
I believe it's the most recent driver
It wouldn't hurt to check on the manufacturer's web site.

Photoshop PDF resolution and color space difference: Acrobat vs. Photoshop?

I have received several Photoshop PDFs from different sources. In Acrobat, the document properties indicate the PDF producer as Adobe Photoshop for macintosh -- Image Conversion Plug-in. When checking the image either with PitStop or through Photoshop via Acrobat's Touch up object tool, the image shows as a 100 dpi RGB image. If the PDF is opened directly in Photoshop, Photoshop indicates it is 300 dpi and CMYK.
Does anyone know why there is this difference? Also what is the Image Conversion Plug-in and how does it work?

Ah, sorry; in that case possibly the Preserve Photoshop Editing Capabilities-button was hit (thus including the original psd-file) but a low-res-pdf-setting selected.
In which case the original data would appear to be CMYK and of a higher resolution that the pdf-images.

Photoshop not seeing export color space setting in Lightroom 4

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for