Photoshop7 problem

I'm getting the following message when I try to open my older copy of Photoshop 7.0.1 "An unexpected and unrecoverable problem has occured because of a program error." I have tried re-installing from the CD, but get the same message. Am I doomed?

Photoshop 7.0.1 through 11.0.2 run flawlessly on my setup under Tiger.
Photoshop 7.0.1 will not work under Leopard, presumably because it was designed to run both on Mac OS 9.2 (Classic) and OS X. Since Leopard dropped Classic support, Photoshop 7.0.1—again presumably—encounters an unknown environment.
2.5 GHz Power Mac (PPC) G5-Quad; 16GB RAM; mutant, flashed 550MHz nVidia GeForce 7800GTX 1,700MHz 512MB VRAM; ATTO ExpressPCI UL5D LP SCSI card; Mac OS X Tiger 10.4.11 and Leopard 10.5.8 boot drives; Spotblight, Dashboard and Time Machine permanently disabled; dual 22" CRT monitors; USB wireless 'n' available but connected to the Internet via wired Ethernet; FW flatbed scanner; 2 SCSI scanners (one tabloid-size transparency scanner and a film scanner); various internal & external HDs; FW Epson 2200 and Ethernet Samsung ML-2850ND printers; 2 X Back-UPS RS 1500 XS units.
Wo Tai Lao Le
我太老了

Similar Messages

Photoshop7 start problem

On my Windows Vista PC I run several Adobe programs: the CS3 suite, Illustrator9, Reader9, but also Photoshop7 and ImageReady7. Two days ago suddenly all Adobe programs refused to start, including the Reader . Apparently, there was a problem with the licences. I have downloaded the LicenceRecovery program from Adobe Support, and having run it, as expected, all programs did run again.......except for one: Photoshop7. Every time when I start the program, it begins loading all the necessary modules, but then a Windows error message appears, saying that the program stopped running, that there is a problem (?) and that I have to close the program.
I've tried several times to de-install and re-install Photoshop7 and ImageReady7 (they both came on the same disc). Every time Set-up congratulates me that I have succesfully installed the programs, while in fact the start problem persists. ImageReady starts, Photoshop does'nt. As Photoshop7 is now an oudated program, Adobe's helpdesk refuses me to help . I suspect that something in the Windows Registry has been corrupted (by LicenceRecovery?), but I have no idea where to look for. Has anyone encountered this problem before, and If so what was the solution?

Google is your friend.
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/1197195?start=0&tstart=0
Photoshop 7 no longer works in Leopard OSX 10.5
Photoshop 7 was released in March 2002, it is now 10 years old.
Sorry for your problems, but you have only 2 possible solutions:
Roll back the OS to an earlier version
Upgrade to a newer version of Photoshop (to save some money you could just get Photoshop Elements instead)
You might want to download a trial version to Photoshop Elements to see if it does what you need before spending any money.
Good Luck

Is anyone else having a problem with photoshop7 and new snow leopard operating system?

Recently purchased new imac with snow leopard operating system. Installed photoshop 7 successfully (it said anyway) but when I try to open get error message stating "an unexpected and unrecoverable problem has occurred because of a program error. Photoshop will now exit." Help!

John_Levine_IOPHFI_INH wrote:
It may not have been considered a "Major Release," But when the it's the only OS that the machines you are currently building will run, it's pretty freakin' major!
(I'm not sure if Apple's latest machines will still run 10.5, or not, but from following this thread, I'm guessing not?)
It is the standard at Apple... the latest build of the current OS is what goes on the new machines, and the Motherboards, Chipsets, & BIOS (not the right term for it with Mac, I know) are "hard written" to accept that OS as the absolute minimum, and nothing older (or lower as some call it).
So, since the latest machines are coming preloaded with Snow Leopard (10.6.2) that, and subsequent newer builds of OS 10.6 and up is all they can be loaded with.
This is nothing new. It's industry wide in both Mac and PC. Just try to put XP on a brand new Dell, HP, or Gateway PC. Without flashing the BIOS and taking a "more likely than not" chance of rendering most of your hardware undetectable, it just ain't gonna happen.
Conversely, just as Snow Leopard won't run on a PPC powered Mac, Vista and 7 may install, or appear to, on a single core, older PC, but the first time you install and try to open anything other than the OS itself, you're in for a world of problems.
People have tried to fight this for years. In 2005 Mac users went out of their minds when Apple dropped support for OS 9. A year later, it was Windows 98 users freaking out over their beloved OS being "sunsetted". I was skeptical of the move to Intel processors when I first heard about it, having become a full time Mac user, and being partial to AMD before that. But like Motorola PPC processors, AMDs run hot and heat is the enemy. The new machines run faster, cooler, and do more for less money.
It's a major pain for people who don't have the budget for a new Mac (or PC) and still have old software that is perfectly functional, but they are finding more and more incompatibility as they interact with other people and newer systems. Sooner or later though, technology wins and everyone has to either upgrade or drop out. Fighting it is futile. I will always remember the day last Summer when I stopped at a traffic light and next to me was an older, redneck looking fellow in a new brand spanking new Honda Accord. It may have even been a hybrid, I don't know, but duct taped on his dash was what had to be a thirty-five year-old 8-track player with a bunch of wires coming out of the back, also taped to the dash, and running to a pair of 6 x 9 speakers, which were just laying on the dash (no duct tape). I had to wonder why he bothered to buy the latest in automotive technology and yet he was stuck in a time warp for his stereo. Don't Hondas come with some pretty decent CD stereo units? And where can you find 8 track tapes anymore?

Large files not opening in photoshop7

I'm having problems opening some large files I've been working on in photoshop7. Win XP pro sp3, HP dx2250 AMD athlon 64 3800+ 98MHz, 1.87GB RAM, 79.4GB free space on C:
When I try to open these files I get a dialog box titled 'New', instead of the opening progress bar starting to fill up. The 'New' dialog box has the correct file name, image size listed as only 452k, when the file is actually over 2GB, Preset sizes set at Default photoshop size, width 16.02cm, height 11.99cm, res 72dpi.
Actual size of file is 2.2GB, 96cm wide x 66cm high at 300dpi. Clicking on the "New" ok button opens up a blank background layer and no others ie it is opening a new file and not the one I have been working on. This happens to two versions of the updated file with separate file names (v3 and v4). I've opened the original file (v2, which still opens ok)) and have been enlarging the canvas size and converting from rgb to cmyk. It appeared to save okay. This happened yesterday, too and I thought I must have not saved it correctly, so redid the work and saved again. Now I know something not right as I can't open the saved files. I've cleared the preferences file but no change.
Any ideas what is happening and why, please?

Thanks Bob (and also John) - that makes sense of what is happening, although I thought I had used 2.5GB files before with no problems.
The file I'm using is 11374 x 7831 pixels (96.3 x 66.3cm at 300dpi). Converting to cmyk had bumped it up to just over 2.1GB, hence the saving problem.
I've now saved and copied it, removed all invisible and construction layers (now down to 70!) and also turned off thumbnails. I can now save a composite to tif format but still not jpeg, which seems weird. Is there a size limit on jpegs?
Also, which Photoshop version introduced the PSB file format? - maybe its time to upgrade . . . thanks again, Andy

Why cant I open D90 and D70 NEF files in photoshop7?

Why cant I open D90 and D70 NEF files in photoshop7?

I suppose you are using Photoshop Elements 7 ?
If so, you may have a problem similar to the one in this thread :
http://forums.adobe.com/message/5565719#5565719

Unable to launch photoshop7

I'm having problems launching photoshop7 on a dx2250 running XP Pro. AMD Athlon 64 processor 3800+ 1.79GHz 1.87GB RAM.
Photoshop7 has been launching and working fine for the past year or so but now gets about halfway through the launch process (loading fonts, brushes, etc) and then disappears off-screen. Its not working in the background, according to TaskManager and I don't understand what or why this is happening.
I've not played about with RAM updates or installed any new software. Temp files, etc cleared (ccleaner), successfully defragged (auslogics).
Also tried a re-install of photoshop7 over the existing software, then uninstalled and re-installed from scratch but the symptom remains. Also checked cd by installing on a backup pc and it all works fine, so the the photoshop7 software is ok. Now upgraded to XP Service Pack 3, also with no change.
The system is not clogged with data files or software so there is masses of RAM.
Any ideas, please?

You need to reset the preferences. Here's how:
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/375776?tstart=0
If that doesn't work, check at what stage exactly PS stops (loading fonts or plug-ins).
Rob

A problem with threads

I am trying to implement some kind of a server listening for requests. The listener part of the app, is a daemon thread that listens for connections and instantiates a handling daemon thread once it gets some. However, my problem is that i must be able to kill the listening thread at the user's will (say via a sto button). I have done this via the Sun's proposed way, by testing a boolean flag in the loop, which is set to false when i wish to kill the thread. The problem with this thing is the following...
Once the thread starts excecuting, it will test the flag, find it true and enter the loop. At some point it will LOCK on the server socket waiting for connection. Unless some client actually connects, it will keep on listening indefinatelly whithought ever bothering to check for the flag again (no matter how many times you set the damn thing to false).
My question is this: Is there any real, non-theoretical, applied way to stop thread in java safely?
Thank you in advance,
Lefty

This was one solution from the socket programming forum, have you tried this??
public Thread MyThread extends Thread{
     boolean active = true;
     public void run(){
          ss.setSoTimeout(90);
          while (active){
               try{
                    serverSocket = ss.accept();
               catch (SocketTimeoutException ste){
               // do nothing
     // interrupt thread
     public void deactivate(){
          active = false;
          // you gotta sleep for a time longer than the
          // accept() timeout to make sure that timeout is finished.
          try{
               sleep(91);
          }catch (InterruptedException ie){
          interrupt();
}

A problem with Threads and MMapi

I am tring to execute a class based on Game canvas.
The problem begin when I try to Play both a MIDI tone and to run an infinit Thread loop.
The MIDI tone "Stammers".
How to over come the problem?
Thanks in advance
Kobi
See Code example below:
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStream;
import javax.microedition.lcdui.Graphics;
import javax.microedition.lcdui.Image;
import javax.microedition.lcdui.game.GameCanvas;
import javax.microedition.media.Manager;
import javax.microedition.media.MediaException;
import javax.microedition.media.Player;
public class MainScreenCanvas extends GameCanvas implements Runnable {
     private MainMIDlet parent;
     private boolean mTrucking = false;
     Image imgBackgound = null;
     int imgBackgoundX = 0, imgBackgoundY = 0;
     Player player;
     public MainScreenCanvas(MainMIDlet parent)
          super(true);
          this.parent = parent;
          try
               imgBackgound = Image.createImage("/images/area03_bkg0.png");
               imgBackgoundX = this.getWidth() - imgBackgound.getWidth();
               imgBackgoundY = this.getHeight() - imgBackgound.getHeight();
          catch(Exception e)
               System.out.println(e.getMessage());
      * starts thread
     public void start()
          mTrucking = true;
          Thread t = new Thread(this);
          t.start();
      * stops thread
     public void stop()
          mTrucking = false;
     public void play()
          try
               InputStream is = getClass().getResourceAsStream("/sounds/scale.mid");
               player = Manager.createPlayer(is, "audio/midi");
               player.setLoopCount(-1);
               player.prefetch();
               player.start();
          catch(Exception e)
               System.out.println(e.getMessage());
     public void run()
          Graphics g = getGraphics();
          play();
          while (true)
               tick();
               input();
               render(g);
      * responsible for object movements
     private void tick()
      * response to key input
     private void input()
          int keyStates = getKeyStates();
          if ((keyStates & LEFT_PRESSED) != 0)
               imgBackgoundX++;
               if (imgBackgoundX > 0)
                    imgBackgoundX = 0;
          if ((keyStates & RIGHT_PRESSED) != 0)
               imgBackgoundX--;
               if (imgBackgoundX < this.getWidth() - imgBackgound.getWidth())
                    imgBackgoundX = this.getWidth() - imgBackgound.getWidth();
      * Responsible for the drawing
      * @param g
     private void render(Graphics g)
          g.drawImage(imgBackgound, imgBackgoundX, imgBackgoundY, Graphics.TOP | Graphics.LEFT);
          this.flushGraphics();
}

You can also try to provide a greater Priority to your player thread so that it gains the CPU time when ever it needs it and don't harm the playback.
However a loop in a Thread and that to an infinite loop is one kind of very bad programming, 'cuz the loop eats up most of your CPU time which in turn adds up more delays of the execution of other tasks (just as in your case it is the playback). By witting codes bit efficiently and planning out the architectural execution flow of the app before start writing the code helps solve these kind of issues.
You can go through [this simple tutorial|http://oreilly.com/catalog/expjava/excerpt/index.html] about Basics of Java and Threads to know more about threads.
Regds,
SD
N.B. And yes there are more articles and tutorials available but much of them targets the Java SE / EE, but if you want to read them here is [another great one straight from SUN|http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/essential/concurrency/index.html] .
Edited by: find_suvro@SDN on 7 Nov, 2008 12:00 PM

J2ME problem with threads

Hi all,
I would like to ask you for a help. I need to write a small program at my university. I started to write a midlet which function would be to countdown time for sports activities. I woul like to start a new thread - the one that counts down - and at the same time make the main thread sleep. After the "countdown" thread finishes, the main thread wakes up and waits for user input. The problem is that when the "countdown" thread finishes his work, I've got Uncaught exception java/lang/NullPointerException. error and the midlet halts.
Below you can find the code
import java.lang.*;
import java.util.*;
import javax.microedition.lcdui.*;
import javax.microedition.midlet.*;
public class intervals extends MIDlet implements CommandListener
public Display ekran;
private SweepCanvas sweeper;
private Form rundy;
private TextField round0, round1, round2, round3, round4, round5, round6, round7, round8;
private long czas,x;
private Command exitCommand;
private Command addRound;
private Command delRound;
private Command start;
private TextField repeat;
private Form odliczanie;
private Alert ostrz;
Licznik thread;
String test;
StringItem test1;
int parz,i,j,k;
static int l;
int ilrund;
int ilpowt;
Item sec;
long sec1;
public intervals()
    rundy = new Form("Interwały sportowe");
    exitCommand = new Command("Wyjście", Command.EXIT, 2);
    addRound = new Command("Dodaj","Dodaj rundę", Command.ITEM,1);
    delRound = new Command("Usuń","Usuń ostatnią rundę", Command.ITEM,1);
    start = new Command("Start", Command.ITEM,1);
    odliczanie = new Form("Odliczanie");
    TextField dodaj(TextField kolej)
        kolej=new TextField("Podaj czas (s) rundy "+parz,null, 4, TextField.NUMERIC);//stworzenie nowej instancji do wybierania czasu trwania rundy
        if(rundy.size()==0)
            rundy.insert(rundy.size(),kolej);
            else
                rundy.insert(rundy.size()-1, kolej);
        return kolej;
    void odliczanie(TextField round)
        monitor m=new monitor();
        k=Integer.parseInt(round.getString());
        ekran.setCurrent(odliczanie);
        thread=new Licznik(k,odliczanie);
        thread.start();
        ekran.setCurrent(rundy);
public void startApp()// throws MIDletStateChangeException
    rundy.deleteAll();
    repeat = new TextField("Podaj ilość powtórzeń",null,1,TextField.NUMERIC);
    rundy.addCommand(addRound);
    rundy.addCommand(exitCommand);
    rundy.setCommandListener(this);
    Canvas obrazek = new MyCanvas();
    ekran = Display.getDisplay(this);
    ekran.setCurrent(obrazek);
    czas=System.currentTimeMillis();
    while (System.currentTimeMillis()<czas+1000)
        continue;
    ekran.setCurrent(rundy);
public void pauseApp()
public void destroyApp(boolean unconditional)
    notifyDestroyed();
public void commandAction(Command c, Displayable s)
    if (c == exitCommand)
        destroyApp(false);
        notifyDestroyed();
    else if(c==addRound)
        if(rundy.size()==0)//Sprawdzenie ilości elementów w celu poprawnego wyświetlania liczby rund w formie
            parz=1;
            else
            parz=rundy.size();
        switch(parz)
            case 1:
                round0=dodaj(round0);break;
            case 2:
                round1=dodaj(round1);break;
            case 3:
               round2= dodaj(round2);break;
            case 4:
                round3=dodaj(round3);break;
            case 5:
                round4=dodaj(round4);break;
            default:
                ostrz=new Alert("Uwaga","Maksymalna liczba rund wynosi 9", null, AlertType.INFO);
                ostrz.setTimeout(3000);
                ekran.setCurrent(ostrz);
        if(rundy.size()==1)
            rundy.append(repeat);
            rundy.addCommand(start);
        rundy.addCommand(delRound);
    else if(c==delRound)
        if(rundy.size()!=0)
            rundy.delete(rundy.size()-2);
            if (rundy.size()==1)
                rundy.deleteAll();
            if(rundy.size()==0)
                rundy.removeCommand(delRound);
                rundy.removeCommand(start);
    else if(c==start)
        ilrund=rundy.size()-1;
        if(this.repeat.size()>0)
            ilpowt=Integer.parseInt(this.repeat.getString());
        ekran = Display.getDisplay(this);
        for (i=1; i<=ilpowt;i++)
            odliczanie= new Form("Odliczanie");
             for (j=0;j<ilrund;j++)
                switch(j)
                     case 0:
                         odliczanie(round0);
                         break;
                     case 1:
                         odliczanie(round1);
                         break;
                     case 2:
                         odliczanie(round2);
                         break;
                     case 3:
                         odliczanie(round3);
                         break;
                     case 4:
                         odliczanie(round4);
                         break;
                     case 5:
                         odliczanie(round5);
                         break;
                     case 6:
                         odliczanie(round6);
                         break;
                     case 7:
                         odliczanie(round7);
                         break;
                     case 8:
                         odliczanie(round8);
                         break;
class Licznik extends Thread
    int czas1,k;
    Form forma;
    monitor m;
    public Licznik(int k,Form formap)
        czas1=k;
        forma=formap;
    public synchronized void run()
        while(czas1>0)
            forma.deleteAll();
            forma.append("Czas pozostały (s): "+czas1);
            try{Thread.sleep(1000);} catch(InterruptedException e){e.printStackTrace();}
            czas1--;
        if(czas1<=0)
            m.put();
    }and monitor class
public class monitor
boolean busy=false;
synchronized void get()
    if(!busy)
        try
            wait();
        }catch(InterruptedException e){e.printStackTrace();}
    notify();
synchronized void put()
    if(busy)
        try
        wait();
        }catch(InterruptedException e){e.printStackTrace();}
    busy=true;
    notify();
}Can anybody help me with this?

Groovemaker,
Your Licznik class has a member m of type monitor, which has not been instantiated (in other words is null) hence, when calling m.put() you get NullPointerException. Please also mind, that using Thread.sleep(1000) is not an accurate way of measuring time.
If I may, please use recommended for Java class naming conventions - some of your names use lower case, while other don't which is confusing to the reader.
Daniel

Problem with threads within applet

Hello,
I got an applet, inside this applet I have a singleton, inside this singleton I have a thread.
this thread is running in endless loop.
he is doing something and go to sleep on and on.
the problem is,
when I refresh my IE6 browser I see more than 1 thread.
for debug matter, I did the following things:
inside the thread, sysout every time he goes to sleep.
sysout in the singleton constructor.
sysout in the singleton destructor.
the output goes like this:
when refresh the page, the singleton constructor loading but not every refresh, sometimes I see the constructor output and sometimes I dont.
The thread inside the singleton is giving me the same output, sometime I see more than one thread at a time and sometimes I dont.
The destructor never works (no output there).
I don't understand what is going on.
someone can please shed some light?
thanks.
btw. I am working with JRE 1.1
this is very old and big applet and I can't convert it to something new.

Ooops. sorry!
I did.
     public void start() {
     public void stop() {
     public void destroy() {
          try {
               resetAll();
               Configuration.closeConnection();
               QuoteItem.closeConnection();
          } finally {
               try {
                    super.finalize();
               } catch (Throwable e) {
                    e.printStackTrace();
     }

Problem with Threads and a static variable

I have a problem with the code below. I am yet to make sure that I understand the problem. Correct me if I am wrong please.
Code functionality:
A timer calls SetState every second. It sets the state and sets boolean variable "changed" to true. Then notifies a main process thread to check if the state changed to send a message.
The problem as far I understand is:
Assume the timer Thread calls SetState twice before the main process Thread runs. As a result, "changed" is set to true twice. However, since the main process is blocked twice during the two calls to SetState, when it runs it would have the two SetState timer threads blocked on its synchronized body. It will pass the first one, send the message and set "changed" to false since it was true. Now, it will pass the second thread, but here is the problem, "changed" is already set to false. As a result, it won't send the message even though it is supposed to.
Would you please let me know if my understanding is correct? If so, what would you propose to resolve the problem? Should I call wait some other or should I notify in a different way?
Thanks,
B.D.
Code:
private static volatile boolean bChanged = false;
private static Thread objMainProcess;
   protected static void Init(){
        objMainProcess = new Thread() {
            public void run() {
                while( objMainProcess == Thread.currentThread() ) {
                   GetState();
        objMainProcess.setDaemon( true );
        objMainProcess.start();
    public static void initStatusTimer(){
        if(objTimer == null)
             objTimer = new javax.swing.Timer( 1000, new java.awt.event.ActionListener(){
                public void actionPerformed( java.awt.event.ActionEvent evt){
                          SetState();
    private static void SetState(){
        if( objMainProcess == null ) return;
        synchronized( objMainProcess ) {
            bChanged = true;
            try{
                objMainProcess.notify();
            }catch( IllegalMonitorStateException e ) {}
    private static boolean GetState() {
        if( objMainProcess == null ) return false;
        synchronized( objMainProcess ) {
            if( bChanged) {
                SendMessage();
                bChanged = false;
                return true;
            try {
                objMainProcess.wait();
            }catch( InterruptedException e ) {}
            return false;
    }

Thanks DrClap for your reply. Everything you said is right. It is not easy to make them alternate since SetState() could be called from different places where the state could be anything else but a status message. Like a GREETING message for example. It is a handshaking message but not a status message.
Again as you said, There is a reason I can't call sendMessage() inside setState().
The only way I was able to do it is by having a counter of the number of notifies that have been called. Every time notify() is called a counter is incremented. Now instead of just checking if "changed" flag is true, I also check if notify counter is greater than zero. If both true, I send the message. If "changed" flag is false, I check again if the notify counter is greater than zero, I send the message. This way it works, but it is kind of a patch than a good design fix. I am yet to find a good solution.
Thanks,
B.D.

Problem with threads running javaw

Hi,
Having a problem with multi thread programming using client server sockets. The program works find when starting the the application in a console using java muti.java , but when using javaw multi.java the program doesnt die and have to kill it in the task manager. The program doesnt display any of my gui error messages either when the server disconnect the client. all works find in a console. any advice on this as I havent been able to understand why this is happening? any comment would be appreciated.
troy.

troy,
Try and post a minimum code sample of your app which
does not work.
When using javaw, make sure you redirect the standard
error and standard output streams to file.
Graeme.Hi Graeme,
I dont understand what you mean by redirection to file? some of my code below.
The code works fine under a console, code is supposed to exit when the client (the other server )disconnects. the problem is that but the clientworker side of the code still works. which under console it doesnt.
public class Server{
ServerSocket aServerSocket;
Socket dianosticsSocket;
Socket nPortExpress;
ClientListener aClientListener;
LinkedList queue = new LinkedList();
int port = 0;
int clientPort = 0;
String clientName = null;
boolean serverAlive = true;
* Server constructor generates a server
* Socket and then starts a client threads.
* @param aPort      socket port of local machine.
public Server(int aPort, String aClientName, int aClientPort){
port = aPort;
clientName = aClientName;
clientPort = aClientPort;
try{
// create a new thread
aServerSocket = new ServerSocket(port) ;
// connect to the nPortExpress
aClientListener = new ClientListener(InetAddress.getByName(clientName), clientPort, queue,this);
// aClientListener.setDaemon(true);
aClientListener.start();
// start a dianostic port
DiagnosticsServer aDiagnosticsServer = new DiagnosticsServer(port,queue,aClientListener);
// System.out.println("Server is running on port " + port + "...");
// System.out.println("Connect to nPort");
catch(Exception e)
// System.out.println("ERROR: Server port " + port + " not available");
JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, (e.toString()),"ERROR: Server port " + port + " not available", JOptionPane.ERROR_MESSAGE);
serverAlive = false;
System.exit(1);
while(serverAlive&&aClientListener.hostSocket.isConnected()){
try{
// connect the client
Socket aClient = aServerSocket.accept();
//System.out.println("open client connection");
//System.out.println("client local: "+ aClient.getLocalAddress().toString());
// System.out.println("client localport: "+ aClient.getLocalPort());
// System.out.println("client : "+ aClient.getInetAddress().toString());
// System.out.println("client port: "+ aClient.getLocalPort());
// make a new client thread
ClientWorker clientThread = new ClientWorker(aClient, queue, aClientListener, false);
// start thread
clientThread.start();
catch(Exception e)
//System.out.println("ERROR: Client connection failure");
JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, (e.toString()),"ERROR: Client connection failure", JOptionPane.ERROR_MESSAGE);
}// end while
} // end constructor Server
void serverExit(){
     JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, "Server ","ERROR: nPort Failure", JOptionPane.ERROR_MESSAGE);
     System.exit(1);
}// end class Server
*** connect to another server
public class ClientListener extends Thread{
InetAddress hostName;
int hostPort;
Socket hostSocket;
BufferedReader in;
PrintWriter out;
boolean loggedIn;
LinkedList queue;      // reference to Server queue
Server serverRef; // reference to main server
* ClientListener connects to the host server.
* @param aHostName is the name of the host eg server name or IP address.
* @param aHostPort is a port number of the host.
* @param aLoginName is the users login name.
public ClientListener(InetAddress aHostName, int aHostPort,LinkedList aQueue,Server aServer)      // reference to Server queue)
hostName = aHostName;
hostPort = aHostPort;
queue = aQueue;
serverRef = aServer;
// connect to the server
try{
hostSocket = new Socket(hostName, hostPort);
catch(IOException e){
//System.out.println("ERROR: Connection Host Failed");
JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, (e.toString()),"ERROR: Connection to nPort Failed", JOptionPane.ERROR_MESSAGE);
System.exit(0);
} // end constructor ClientListener
** multi client connection server
ClientWorker(Socket aSocket,LinkedList aQueue, ClientListener aClientListener, boolean diagnostics){
queue = aQueue;
addToQueue(this);
client = aSocket;
clientRef = aClientListener;
aDiagnostic = diagnostics;
} // end constructor ClientWorker
* run method is the main loop of the server program
* in change of handle new client connection as well
* as handle all messages and errors.
public void run(){
boolean alive = true;
String aSubString = "";
in = null;
out = null;
loginName = "";
loggedIn = false;
while (alive && client.isConnected()&& clientRef.hostSocket.isConnected()){
try{
in = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(client.getInputStream()));
out = new PrintWriter(new OutputStreamWriter(client.getOutputStream()));
if(aDiagnostic){
out.println("WELCOME to diagnostics");
broadCastDia("Connect : diagnostics "+client.getInetAddress().toString());
out.flush();
else {
out.println("WELCOME to Troy's Server");
broadCastDia("Connect : client "+client.getInetAddress().toString());
     out.flush();
String line;
while(((line = in.readLine())!= null)){
StringTokenizer aStringToken = new StringTokenizer(line, " ");
if(!aDiagnostic){
broadCastDia(line);
clientRef.sendMessage(line); // send mesage out to netExpress
out.println(line);
out.flush();
else{
if(line.equals("GETIPS"))
getIPs();
else{
clientRef.sendMessage(line); // send mesage out to netExpress
out.println(line);
out.flush();
} // end while
catch(Exception e){
// System.out.println("ERROR:Client Connection reset");
                         JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, (e.toString()),"ERROR:Client Connection reset", JOptionPane.ERROR_MESSAGE);
try{
if(aDiagnostic){
broadCastDia("Disconnect : diagnostics "+client.getInetAddress().toString());
out.flush();
else {
broadCastDia("Disconnect : client "+client.getInetAddress().toString());
     out.flush();
// close the buffers and connection;
in.close();
out.close();
client.close();
// System.out.println("out");
// remove from list
removeThreadQueue(this);
alive = false;
catch(Exception e){
// System.out.println("ERROR: Client Connection reset failure");
JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, (e.toString()),"ERROR: Client Connection reset failure", JOptionPane.ERROR_MESSAGE);
}// end while
} // end method run
* method run - Generates io stream for communicating with the server and
* starts the client gui. Run also parses the input commands from the server.
public void run(){
boolean alive = true;
try{
// begin to life the gui
// aGuiClient = new ClientGui(hostName.getHostName(), hostPort, loginName, this);
// aGuiClient.show();
in = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(hostSocket.getInputStream()));
out = new PrintWriter(new OutputStreamWriter(hostSocket.getOutputStream()));
while (alive && hostSocket.isConnected()){
String line;
while(((line = in.readLine())!= null)){
System.out.println(line);
broadCast(line);
} // end while
} // end while
catch(Exception e){
//     System.out.println("ERRORa Connection to host reset");
JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, (e.toString()),"ERROR: Connection to nPort reset", JOptionPane.ERROR_MESSAGE);
try{
hostSocket.close();
     }catch(Exception a){
     JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, (a.toString()),"ERROR: Exception", JOptionPane.ERROR_MESSAGE);
alive = false;
System.exit(1);
} // end method run

Problem with Threads and "plase wait..."-Window

Hi everyone,
I have a problem that I'm not able to solve in any way... I have a time-consuming task (a file decryption) which I execute in a separate thread; I've used the SwingWorker class, like suggested by sun-tutorial, and it works right. The problem is that I have to wait that the decryption have finished before continuing with program-execution. Therefore I would like to display a "please wait"-window while the task runs. I've tryed all the possible ways I know but the problem is always the same: the waitWindow is displayed empty, the bounds are painted but the contents no; it's only painted when the decrypt-task has finished. Please help me, I have no more resources....
decrypt-file code:
public class DecryptFile {
private String cryptedFileNameAndPath;
private ByteArrayInputStream resultStream = null;
// need for progress
private int lengthOfTask;
private int current = -1;
private String statMessage;
public DecryptFile(String encZipFileNameAndPath) {
    cryptedFileNameAndPath = encZipFileNameAndPath;
    //Compute length of task...
    // 0 for indeterminate
    lengthOfTask = 0;
public ByteArrayInputStream getDecryptedInputStream() {
    return this.resultStream;
   * Called from ProgressBarDemo to start the task.
public void go() {
    current = -1;
    final SwingWorker worker = new SwingWorker() {
      public Object construct() {
        return new ActualTask();
    worker.start();
   * Called from ProgressBarDemo to find out how much work needs
   * to be done.
public int getLengthOfTask() {
    return lengthOfTask;
   * Called from ProgressBarDemo to find out how much has been done.
public int getCurrent() {
    return current;
public void stop() {
    current = lengthOfTask;
   * Called from ProgressBarDemo to find out if the task has completed.
public boolean done() {
    if (current >= lengthOfTask)
      return true;
    else
      return false;
public String getMessage() {
    return statMessage;
   * The actual long running task. This runs in a SwingWorker thread.
class ActualTask {
    ActualTask () {
      current = -1;
      statMessage = "";
      resultStream = AIUtil.getInputStreamFromEncZip(cryptedFileNameAndPath); //here the decryption happens
      current = 0;
      statMessage = "";
}The code that calls decryption and displays waitWindow
      final WaitSplash wS = new WaitSplash("Please wait...");
      final DecryptFile cryptedTemplate = new DecryptFile (this.templateFile);
      cryptedTemplate.go();
      while (! cryptedTemplate.done()) {
        try {
          wait();
        } catch (Exception e) { }
      this.templateInputStream = cryptedTemplate.getDecryptedInputStream();
      wS.close();Thanks, thanks, thanks in advance!
Edoardo

Maybe you can try setting the priority of the long-running thread to be lower? so that the UI will be more responsive...

Problem with threads in j2me

im using jdk 1.6 with java wtk 2.1
ya i know..
2.1 is a jdk1.4 source
but im using souce as 1.4 during compiliation so thats not the prob
this is my code
package org.learn;
import javax.microedition.midlet.MIDlet;
import javax.microedition.lcdui.Alert;
import javax.microedition.lcdui.Display;
public class thtest extends MIDlet
Thread t;
public void startApp()
Alert a=new Alert("hello");
a.setString("hello");
Alert b=new Alert("world");
b.setString("world");
Display d = Display.getDisplay(this );
d.setCurrent(a);
t=Thread.currentThread();
try{
t.sleep(10000);
catch (Exception e){}
d.setCurrent(b);
public void pauseApp()
public void destroyApp(boolean unconditional)
its just supposed to pause between the alerts using threads
however when i run it using the wtk, the emulator run properly but when i launch the app, it stops executing giving me this:
"Error verifying method org/learn/thtest startApp()V
Approximate bytecode offset 49: Inconsistent or missing stackmap at target
%the stack info%
Execution completed.
437782 bytecodes executed
9 thread switches
486 classes in the system (including system classes)
2506 dynamic objects allocated (73832 bytes)
2 garbage collections (60652 bytes collected)
Execution completed.
437782 bytecodes executed
9 thread switches
486 classes in the system (including system classes)
ALERT: java/lang/VerifyError: org/learn/thtest.
2506 dynamic objects allocated (73832 bytes)
2 garbage collections (60652 bytes collected)
please can someone help me out with this, is it an error on my part or do i have to set some option.

Hi gandalf123,
First, Thread.sleep is a static method, so you don't need to create a Thread object to use it.
I think the problem is due to the fact you don't preverify your midlet.
More over, you don't need to double post your question.

Problem with threads and camera.

Hi everybody!
I've a problem with taking snapshot.
I would like to display a loading screen after it take snapshot ( sometimes i
have to wait few seconds after i took snapshot. Propably photo is being taken in time where i have to wait).
I was trying to use threads but i didn't succeed.
I made this code:
display.setCurrent(perform);
        new Thread(new Runnable(){
            public void run() {
                while((!performing.isShown()) && (backgroundCamera.isShown())){
                    Thread.yield();
                notifyAll();
        }).start();
        new Thread(new Runnable(){
            public void run() {
                try {
                    this.wait();
                } catch(Exception e) {
                    exceptionHandler(e);
                photo = camera.snapshot();
                display.setCurrent(displayPhoto);
        }).start();This code is sometimes showing performing screen but sometimes no.
I don't know why. In my opinion performing.isShown() method isn't working correctly.
Does anyone have some idea how to use threads here?

Hi,
I've finally managed to work this fine.
The code:
       Object o = new Object();
       display.setCurrent(perform);
        new Thread(new Runnable(){
            public void run() {
                while(!performing.isShown()){
                    Thread.yield();
               synchronized(o) {
                  o.notify();
        }).start();
        new Thread(new Runnable(){
            public void run() {
                try {
                    synchronized(o) {
                       o.wait(1);
                } catch(Exception e) {
                    exceptionHandler(e);
                photo = camera.snapshot();
                display.setCurrent(displayPhoto);
        }).start();

Photoshop7 problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for