PHP & ImageMagick & /opt/local/bin

hi
I have been looking for hours and can't find a solution that works to this.
From the command line I can use ImageMagicks "convert image.jpg image.gif" command for example, but when I try to include it as an exec command inside a php script it says "convert: command not found".
To make it work I need to specify the /opt/local/bin/convert full path to "convert".
I have added the path to my PATH env, but it still doesn't get picked up by Apache and PHP and work.
Can anyone help me with this one?
Thanks, Regan.
Message was edited by: regan y

I've been all over the internet trying to find a solution to this problem -- this post is the closest thing I've found to a solution, but I'm still not quite there. What I'm trying to do is process a .tex document into a .dvi file which in turn gets converted to postscript (.ps) document. The last step is to use imagemagick's "convert" to transform the .ps file into a .png file and I'm done. I'm calling everything from PHP.
When I originally tried it, I didn't include the full paths -- everything worked, except the "convert" program. After poking around on the 'net (and reading this suggested solution), I included the full paths (see below). Again -- everything works, except the last "convert" step.
# Process .tex document into .dvi file:
/usr/local/texlive/2008/bin/universal-darwin/latex myLatex.tex
# Convert .dvi file into .ps document:
/usr/local/texlive/2008/bin/universal-darwin/dvips -E myLatex.dvi -o myLatex.ps
# Last (frustrating!) step: convert .ps document into .png image:
/usr/local/bin/convert myLatex.ps myLatex.png
It works great in Terminal, so I wrote it up as a tcsh shell script. The shell script does what it should from Terminal but when called from PHP, it only executes the first two programs (latex and dvips) but not convert. I can't seem to locate any log files to troubleshoot this further.
Any and all ideas welcome. Why does LaTeX work but not convert? Why does dvips work but not convert? Thanks in advance !

Similar Messages

/usr/local/bin OR /opt/local/bin

I recently installed osxvnc and the install program put it into /opt/local/bin. I already had /usr/local/bin etc.
Is there a standard way of doing this - that is using /opt/local or /usr/local or is opt for optional programs and /usr/local for locally developed programs?
TIA

Fink uses /sw and darwinports uses /opt/local specifically so that what you have in /usr/local doesn't interfere with fink, or with darwinports, and that their installs don't interfere with what you install manually into /usr/local.
Use /usr/local for software you compile by hand that installs in there by default. Keep fink and darwinports separate from this, and separate from each other. The best way to do this is to leave everything as it is.
If you want to, you can configure fink (and I assume darwinports) to install everything into /usr/local. Again, I suggest you not do it for the same reasons as just given. More details of how and why this was done are available on the fink and on the darwinports documentation sites.

Simple script in /usr/local/bin just won't start - SOLVED

I put this really simple script for starting psi into my /usr/local/bin, set it a+xr and added /usr/local/bin to my path. However, I just can't start the damn thing.
Here's the script itself (I really don't think there's something wrong with it, since if I type it in the shell it works fine):
#!/bin/zsh/
#start psi, never stop
while true;
do psi;
done
Here's my users $PATH:
─$ print $PATH
/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/opt/bin:/usr/local/bin:/opt/kde/bin:/opt/mozilla/bin:/opt/qt/bin
Here's the permissions of the script:
$ ls -lah /usr/local/bin
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 80 Dec 15 03:52 ./
drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 240 Dec 10 18:55 ../
-rwxrwxr-x 1 kamagurka users 60 Dec 15 03:51 psi.start*
And here's what happens when I try to execute it:
$ psi.start
zsh: command not found: psi.start
So, I'm either missing something incredibly obvious, or something freaky's going on here. I hope it's the former.
EDIT: I had no idea where to put this, so I put it into Desktop Env since I'm trying to start a graphical app, but feel free to move it.
EDIT: Yea, I was being a little dense.

smoon wrote:Not sure if that's the problem, but try removing the trailing / (slash) from your script's shebang.
See, something really obvious. Stupid, even. You can see, I don't do a lot of scripting.

$PATH missing '/usr/local/bin'

$PATH missing '/usr/local/bin' in /etc/login.defs and /etc/profile.
I only noticed, being somewhat a noob, after compiling the NEW Dillo 0.7.3 and finding that it places its' executable in /usr/local/bin (!). This, not being in my $PATH by default.
Please consider adding this line to future ARCH 0.6 or beyond for WORKSTATION users:
# /etc/profile
export PATH="/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/opt/bin"
Thanx.

Mt.Tam-Luxer wrote:I only noticed, being somewhat a noob, after compiling the NEW Dillo 0.7.3
A very wise decision to use this great browser :-) ... and I'm even serious about that.
Mt.Tam-Luxer wrote:and finding that it places its' executable in /usr/local/bin (!). This, not being in my $PATH by default.
For some reason it is in my /etc/profile ... but I don't remember if I put it there or not.
Firstly, (and as already mentioned more or less) I can see arguments why AL does not include /usr/local/bin by default (mainly because there is nothing there when only installing AL packages).
But OTOH, this is the beauty of AL : you can (and are even supposed to) configure your system as you like by editing the files in /etc. I guess that's why I don't remember, because the first thing I would do if need be is editing /etc/profile ;-) ...
Oh, but something (very general !) to consider : if you want to keep your system "Unix-style", don't put every posible PATH in /etc/profile, but put it in ~/.profile (or whatever shell you are using). If you are the only user, it does not really matter. But in a "true multi-user Unix system" you should not have /funky/path/bin in /etc/ ... not that /usr/local is exotic ....this is more of a general note.
sarah31 wrote:but imho if there is a PKGBUILD for a desired app (such as dillo)
yes, the PKGBUILD for dillo works fine, however, last week they released the latest version 0.7.3 which Mt.Tam-Luxer tried to install ( ... hint ... hint ... package maintainers ... :-) ... ). It was not quite clear from your post if yo wanted him to modify the PKGBUILD script or to just use it.
Oh, and besides changing pkgver, the source should now point to http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-0.7.3.tar.bz2

Explanation of usr/local/bin

I have see this path come up when I have installed PHP/MySQL etc on my machine but neve rundersttod what it means.
Is this the directory where programmes are installed by me that are not part of the OS, like Photoshop, PHP, MySQL, MS word etc?
How do I look for files on my Finder are they stored on my HD or in my user profile?

Andy,
To add to Michael and j.v.'s posts, /usr/local has been the traditional place to install 3rd party software ie. software not written by the company that made the OS. So, /usr/local/bin contained binary files, /usr/local/lib contained the library files, /usr/local/man contained the man pages, and so forth. If you look on old Sun's, IBM, HP and other machines dating to the early 90's, that's generally what you'll see. Not all system administrators, or workstation owners, followed the general design intentions of the UNIX file system however.
Now, binaries, libraries and man pages can be in a wide variety of places, depending upon the package installer's design. Fink will like to default to /sw, for example.
As for freeware, or shareware, a well-designed config file will allow you to specify paths for bin, lib and man directories. So, with a little planning, you can get MySQL, and other open source freeware, to install in a directory layout of your design.
I've always thought of "usr" to mean "User", as in the end User, versus the OS system itself. So /bin and /sbin were for binaries that were primarily used/called by other system routines, while /usr/bin and /usr/local/bin would contain binaries that User's may call/use. Doesn't mean you can't use stuff in /bin, nor that system administration stuff can't be in /usr/bin. I think of it only as a general guide to understanding why something is in a particular directory, not a hard and fast rule.
Good general references on the overall design of UNIX are "The Design of the UNIX Operating System" by Maurice Bach, and "The Design and Implementation of the FreeBSD Operating System" by Marshall McKusick and George Neville-Neil.
Ed
PB G4 Mac OS X (10.2.x)

How to put g95 in usr/local/bin?

Hi all,
I am trying to compile a program called elmerice. When I type the "make compile" command, I get the following message:
elmerf90-nosh -c Solvers/AIFlowSolve_nlD2.f90 -o Solvers/AIFlowSolve_nlD2.o
/usr/local/bin/g95 -O5 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize -march=nocona -fprefetch-loop-arrays -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -falign-loops -I. -Ibinio -I/Applications/ElmerGUI.app/Contents//share/elmersolver/include -c Solvers/AIFlowSolve_nlD2.f90 -o Solvers/AIFlowSolve_nlD2.o
/Applications/ElmerGUI.app/Contents/bin/elmerf90-nosh: line 18: /usr/local/bin/g95: No such file or directory
I did install (I think successfully) g95 using macports, i.e. the command "sudo port install g95" but apparently it is not in /usr/local/bin, which seems to be where elmerice wants to find it.
One complicating factor might be that /usr/local/bin does have gfortran it.
It seems like elmerice will only use g95. Can I put g95 in the /usr/local/bin directory from wherever I have it now, and if so, how? Or can I just reinstall g95 in that directory?
Thanks,

Try creating a symbolic link from /usr/local/bin/g95 to wherever MacPorts put it. That is probably the easiest solution. Ideally, you would fix the makefile, but that wouldn't be easy.

Compilation error, no /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc on Solaris 10 64bit(x86)

I was trying to compile Apache mod_jk on Solaris 10 64bit platform(x86) and I got the following error. I checked my system and I do not have /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc. Any suggestions how to solve it?
root@unknown >./configure --with-apxs=/usr/apache2/bin/apxs
building connector for "apache-2.0"
checking for gcc... /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc
checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.
Edited by: loveclaire on Aug 5, 2009 8:26 PM

SUNWspro is sun studio. Its a free download from the sun site. So you could just install that.
Alternatively, Solaris ships with gcc already installed. But apxs is trying to be clever and compile mod_jk with the same compiler that was used to compile the rest of apache.
It would probably work with gcc, but I'm not sure how you would persuade apxs to use gcc instead.

Not able to see make in /usr/local/bin even after installing the package

Hi,
I have installed the package make-3.8 for solaris 9 on my machine with sun os 5.9. But still I can not see 'make' in /usr/local/bin .
Does anyone have an idea why?
I installed the same as root using the command:
pkdadd -d <packagename>
But it gives me quite many warnings like :
WARNING : /usr/local/bin/make <not present on Read only file system>
WARNING : /usr/local/bin/doc/make/ABOUT-NLS <not present on Read only file system>
At the end it says Installation of SMCmake was successful
Still I can't see make in /usr/local/bin.
Regards
Manmeet

Seems like /usr/local is mounted read-only? Run
mount | grep local
or
touch /usr/local/test
and see if you can write files in the directory.
/M.

/usr/local/bin/pdf2ps: gs: not found

GS 8.54
Solaris 10
Oracle 11.5.10.2
I'm having problem regarding the pdf2ps which it seem cannot find the pdf2ps. When i try to print the pdf file in apps using pasta.
The printer confirm support pasta and post script.
The report submited is complete with warning. This is the error inside the log file.
/usr/local/bin/pdf2ps: gs: not found
Pasta: Error: Preprocess failed. Command=/usr/local/bin/pdf2ps /v99/app/applmgr/abghfuat/applcsf/out/ABGHFUAT_e2sscorhrmdba02/ABG_APXPBFOR_XML_BMO_2495102_1.PDF /v30/app/applmgr/abghfuat/comn/temp/pasta18270_0.tmp
Pasta: Error: Preprocess or Print command failed!!!
APP-FND-00500: AFPPRN received a return code of failure from routine FDUPRN. An error occurred while AOL tried to spawn the print process
Cause: AFPPRN received a return code of failure from the OSD routine FDUPRN. An error occurred while AOL tried to spawn the print process.
.pdf file being generated, but failing when calling Pasta.

Hi,
Since you indicate a version number for ghostscript in your post (8.54), I'm guessing the issue is that gs is not in the path for the applmgr user. On my system (Linux, not Solaris, so there may be differences), gs and pdf2ps are in different directories.
Try running the following command as the applmgr user:
which gsIf you don't get the path to gs as output from that command, you will need to add the path to gs to the path environment variable of the applmgr user.
Regards,
John P.

/usr/local/bin vs /usr/bin and Kazehakase vs Firefox

When you install an application to /usr/bin will it be more faster than installed on /usr/local/bin?
I have Firefox installed in /usr/bin and Kazehakase installed to /usr/local/bin. And it seems that Firefox is faster than Kazehakase. Why?
Last edited by Paingiver (2008-03-15 11:11:48)

dyscoria wrote:
Endperform wrote:The notion that an application can be sped up by linking it in your home directory, or even renaming it to one letter is also crazy. Your install will search for an executable in the path specified in $PATH and then execute the first instance it finds, but this does NOT speed the application itself up.
No seriously, if you rename all your executables to one letter then your system runs like lightning!
* am i really that bad at sarcasm? *
Yes, since there was no indication of sarcasm in your post. A or would have worked

/usr/local/bin

Hello everyone,
Whenever i am installing any s/w from source by compiling,its executable is getting stored in /usr/local/bin.Now im unable to use the s/w by just typing its executable name in the terminal,its giving me an error as "command not found".what i have to do is browse to the directory /usr/local/bin n then run the executable as ./xxxxx.How can i add the directory /usr/local/bin so that it too is checked for executables.
Thanks in advance,
Rajiv Nair.

Anyway, /usr/local is made just for those things you do not want to be touched by your package manager. So, if for any reason you do not want to write a PKGBUILD for something (if e.g., it is just a little script you wrote and you want to install it system-wide; or you have some reasons to make the compilation routine step by step), then /usr/local is then just the right place: /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/sbin for executable with various permissions, /usr/local/lib for the libraries, may be /usr/local/src for the sources, etc. Then you should just modify your /etc/profile (or your .bashrc, .zshrc).
This is not what is supported by arch, but it is something you can always do, if you like so, in any linux system of the world.

Usr/local/bin...or where?

hey guys,
I just made a package of sylpheed claws 2.00. Everything went ok, but the binary was placed in /usr/local/bin. For reasons I don't quite understand, this is not an arch-like place to be. So where should I put it, and how should I modify my pkgbuild to put it there?
btw, here's the fairly plain pkgbuild;
pkgname=sylpheed-claws
pkgver=2.0.0
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="The stable extended version of sylpheed"
url="http://claws.sylpheed.org/"
licence=""
depends=(pkgconfig libetpan)
makedepends=()
conflicts=()
replaces=()
backup=()
install=
source=(http://internap.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/sylpheed-claws/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.gz)
md5sums=('7ddfc626484ae0954a78c5233931e21a')
build() {
cd $startdir/src/$pkgname-$pkgver
./configure --with-gtk2
make || return 1
make DESTDIR=$startdir/pkg install
also, what forum should I have posted this to?
thanks!

Well ... it CAN be set to anywhere you like, but compliance with the Arch Packaging Standards would be preferable - or mandatory, if you want to submit your PKGBUILD to the AUR. A quick read of the AUR User Guidelines would also be useful in that case.
General hints -
./configure --help
will give you all the options for most apps. The ABS wiki pages provide the Arch-specific stuff.

How do I change permisson to write on /usr/local/bin??

Hi
I'm installing a software by source (PKG-CONFIG) as needed by bluefish, however which I was doing " Make install" the terminal told me that it can't write on /usr/local/bin/pkg-config......so how do I change the permission so that I can start installing??
Thanks
Chris

Precede the install command with "sudo" and use your password (provided you are an admin). Then the insatller will have permission to write as if you are the "root" user.
eg:
$ sudo install
will run "install" as if run by root - who does have permission to write to the dir.
MacBook (BootCamp), various Macs and servers Mac OS X (10.4.7)

How to change /usr/bin/grep To /usr/local/bin/grep

Hi
I have installed GNU Grep but when I am giving the command #which grep it is showing me solaris grep i.e /usr/bin/grep.
My question is how do I change it to /usr/local/bin/
Thanks in advance
Sukrut

You have a few options:
1) place /usr/local/bin before /usr/bin in your PATH environment variable
2) remove /usr/bin/grep altogether
3) move /usr/bin/grep to something else (ie: /usr/bin/solaris/grep) and symlink /usr/bin/grep to /usr/local/bin/grep just in case any hard coded programs/scripts rely on /usr/bin/grep being present.
I prefer step #3 since most of the various gnu utilities are virtually 100% drop-in replacements.

How do I add /usr/local/bin to path

Hi.
I have installed arch linux on a server.
It seems really very good - manged to install latest snort-inline easily...
However (and this is really a completely NOOB question)
- how do I add /usr/local/bin to the default (root) path ?
I have tried to add
PATH=/usr/local/bin
to /etc/enviornment
But it did not show up when using the - env command (after re-logging in)
I know that I could sym link to /usr/bin but i would like to know.
Any help would be good
Cheers
Last edited by yossarianuk (2008-10-02 10:31:21)

There's a place for all three of /usr/bin, /usr/local/bin, and ~/bin --- even on Arch.
If you download package whizbang-1.2.3 from some non-Arch site, its installer will often by default try to install its files into the /usr/local hierarchy. When making a PKGBUILD, you want to tell it instead to install into $pkgdir/usr, so that when you install the resulting pkg file with pacman, it goes into the /usr hierarchy. That's what the wiki page is saying: pacman-managed stuff goes into the /usr hierarchy.
/usr/local/* is for files you want to install systemwide without making a PKGBUILD. Your own scripts are a great example. Also you might want to install some compiled files that way, if making a PKGBUILD isn't worth it or you don't have the time to write (*and maintain!*) one.
~/bin is for scripts (could be compiled files too) that you want to only be available to that specific user.

PHP & ImageMagick & /opt/local/bin

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for