Physical  storage  for infoobject

Hi
   Could you tell me  what  is physical  storage in infoobject ? especially one infoobject(name is A) belong to another (name is B) as a  attribute, in this case , physically where are data of A?  Did it storage in the table in the infoobject B owning attributes?   or data is storage in sid table by A itself and when we see the masterdata of b ,the system join all the  sid table which blong to respective attibutes to show masterdata?

Hi Guixin,
Info-object A can also have its own attributes. The concept of having depends basically on the data modelling and the data dependency. An Employee can have name, address, phone number, department as its attributes. Similarly department will have attributes like location, etc...
But each info-object will have its own text.
SID's are created by the BW system themselves. If you are looking for data in the backend then look for "M" table. It would be /BIC/M<name of the info-object> or /BI0/M<name of the info-object>.
Bye
Dinesh

Similar Messages

  • Upgrading a 3-node Hyper-V clusters storage for £10k and getting the most bang for our money.

    Hi all, looking for some discussion and advice on a few questions I have regarding storage for our next cluster upgrade cycle.
    Our current system for a bit of background:
    3x Clustered Hyper-V Servers running Server 2008 R2 (72TB Ram, dual cpu etc...)
    1x Dell MD3220i iSCSI with dual 1GB connections to each server (24x 146GB 15k SAS drives in RAID 10) - Tier 1 storage
    1x Dell MD1200 Expansion Array with 12x 2TB 7.2K drives in RAID 10 - Tier 2 storage, large vm's, files etc...
    ~25 VM's running all manner of workloads, SQL, Exchange, WSUS, Linux web servers etc....
    1x DPM 2012 SP1 Backup server with its own storage.
    Reasons for upgrading:
    Storage though put is becoming an issue as we only get around 125MB/s over the dual 1GB iSCSI connections to each physical server.  (tried everything under the sun to improve bandwidth but I suspect the MD3220i Raid is the bottleneck here.
    Backup times for vm's (once every night) is now in the 5-6 hours range.
    Storage performance during backups and large file syncronisations (DPM)
    Tier 1 storage is running out of capacity and we would like to build in more IOPS for future expansion.
    Tier 2 storage is massively underused (6tb of 12tb Raid 10 space)
    Migrating to 10GB server links.
    Total budget for the upgrade is in the region of £10k so I have to make sure we get absolutely the most bang for our buck.  
    Current Plan:
    Upgrade the cluster to Server 2012 R2
    Install a dual port 10GB NIC team in each server and virtualize cluster, live migration, vm and management traffic (with QoS of course)
    Purchase a new JBOD SAS array and leverage the new Storage Spaces and SSD caching/tiering capabilities.  Use our existing 2TB drives for capacity and purchase sufficient SSD's to replace the 15k SAS disks.
    On to the questions:
    Is it supported to use storage spaces directly connected to a Hyper-V cluster?  I have seen that for our setup we are on the verge of requiring a separate SOFS for storage but the extra costs and complexity are out of our reach. (RDMA, extra 10GB NIC's
    etc...)
    When using a storage space in a cluster, I have seen various articles suggesting that each csv will be active/passive within the cluster.  Causing redirected IO for all cluster nodes not currently active?
    If CSV's are active/passive its suggested that you should have a csv for each node in your cluster?  How in production do you balance vm's accross 3 CSV's without manually moving them to keep 1/3 of load on each csv?  Ideally I would like just
    a single CSV active/active for all vm's to sit on.  (ease of management etc...)
    If the CSV is active/active am I correct in assuming that DPM will backup vm's without causing any re-directed IO?
    Will DPM backups of VM's be incremental in terms of data transferred from the cluster to the backup server?
    Thanks in advance for anyone who can be bothered to read through all that and help me out!  I'm sure there are more questions I've forgotten but those will certainly get us started.
    Also lastly, does anyone else have a better suggestion for how we should proceed?
    Thanks

    Current Plan:
    Upgrade the cluster to Server 2012 R2
    Install a dual port 10GB NIC team in each server and virtualize cluster, live migration, vm and management traffic (with QoS of course)
    Purchase a new JBOD SAS array and leverage the new Storage Spaces and SSD caching/tiering capabilities.  Use our existing 2TB drives for capacity and purchase sufficient SSD's to replace the 15k SAS disks.
    On to the questions:
    Is it supported to use storage spaces directly connected to a Hyper-V cluster?  I have seen that for our setup we are on the verge of requiring a separate SOFS for storage but the extra costs and complexity are out of our reach. (RDMA, extra 10GB NIC's
    etc...)
    When using a storage space in a cluster, I have seen various articles suggesting that each csv will be active/passive within the cluster.  Causing redirected IO for all cluster nodes not currently active?
    If CSV's are active/passive its suggested that you should have a csv for each node in your cluster?  How in production do you balance vm's accross 3 CSV's without manually moving them to keep 1/3 of load on each csv?  Ideally I would like just
    a single CSV active/active for all vm's to sit on.  (ease of management etc...)
    If the CSV is active/active am I correct in assuming that DPM will backup vm's without causing any re-directed IO?
    Will DPM backups of VM's be incremental in terms of data transferred from the cluster to the backup server?
    Thanks in advance for anyone who can be bothered to read through all that and help me out!  I'm sure there are more questions I've forgotten but those will certainly get us started.
    Also lastly, does anyone else have a better suggestion for how we should proceed?
    Thanks
    1) You can use direct connection to SAS with a 3-node cluster of course (4-node, 5-node etc). Sure it would be much faster then running with an additional SoFS layer (with SAS fed directly to your Hyper-V cluster nodes all reads and writes would be local
    travelling down the SAS fabric and with SoFS layer added you'll have the same amount of I/Os targeting SAS + Ethernet with its huge compared to SAS latency sitting in between a requestor and your data residing on SAS spindles, I/Os overwrapped into SMB-over-TCP-over-IP-over-Etherent
    requests at the hypervisor-SoFS layers). Reason why SoFS is recommended - final SoFS-based solution would be cheaper as SAS-only is a pain to scale beyond basic 2-node configs. Instead of getting SAS switches, adding redundant SAS controllers to every hypervisor
    node and / or looking for expensive multi-port SAS JBODs you'll have a pair (at least) of SoFS boxes doing a file level proxy in front of a SAS-controlled back end. So you'll compromise performance in favor of cost. See:
    http://davidzi.com/windows-server-2012/hyper-v-and-scale-out-file-cluster-home-lab-design/
    Used interconnect diagram within this design would actually scale beyond 2 hosts. But you'll have to get a SAS switch (actually at least two of them for redundancy as you don't want any component to become a single point of failure, don't you?)
    2) With 2012 R2 all I/O from a multiple hypervisor nodes is done thru the storage fabric (in your case that's SAS) and only metadata updates would be done thru the coordinator node and using Ethernet connectivity. Redirected I/O would be used in a two cases
    only a) no SAS connectivity from the hypervisor node (but Ethernet one is still present) and b) broken-by-implementation backup software would keep access to CSV using snapshot mechanism for too long. In a nutshell: you'll be fine :) See for references:
    http://www.petri.co.il/redirected-io-windows-server-2012r2-cluster-shared-volumes.htm
    http://www.aidanfinn.com/?p=12844
    3) These are independent things. CSV is not active/passive (see 2) so basically with an interconnection design you'll be using there's virtually no point to having one-CSV-per-hypervisor. There are cases when you'd still probably do this. For example if
    you'd have all-flash and combined spindle/flash LUNs and you know for sure you want some VMs to sit on flash and others (no so I/O hungry) to stay within "spinning rust". One more case is many-node cluster. With it multiple nodes basically fight for a single
    LUN and a lot of time is wasted for SCSI reservation conflicts resove (ODX has no reservation offload like VAAI has so even if ODX is present its not going to help). Again it's a place where SoFS "helps" as having intermediate proxy level turns block I/O into
    file I/O triggering SCSI reservation conflicts for a two SoFS nodes only instead of an evey node in a hypervisor cluster. One more good example is when you'll have a mix of a local I/O (SAS) and Ethernet with a Virtual SAN products. Virtual SAN runs directly
    as part of the hypervisor and emulates high performance SAN using cheap DAS. To increase performance it DOES make sense to create a  concept of a "local LUN" (and thus "local CSV") as reads targeting this LUN/CSV would be passed down the local storage
    stack instead of hitting the wire (Ethernet) and going to partner hypervisor nodes to fetch the VM data. See:
    http://www.starwindsoftware.com/starwind-native-san-on-two-physical-servers
    http://www.starwindsoftware.com/sw-configuring-ha-shared-storage-on-scale-out-file-servers
    (feeding basically DAS to Hyper-V and SoFS to avoid expensive SAS JBOD and SAS spindles). The same thing as VMware is doing with their VSAN on vSphere. But again that's NOT your case so it DOES NOT make sense to keep many CSVs with only 3 nodes present or
    SoFS possibly used. 
    4) DPM is going to put your cluster in redirected mode for a very short period of time. Microsoft says NEVER. See:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh758090.aspx
    Direct and Redirect I/O
    Each Hyper-V host has a direct path (direct I/O) to the CSV storage Logical Unit Number (LUN). However, in Windows Server 2008 R2 there are a couple of limitations:
    For some actions, including DPM backup, the CSV coordinator takes control of the volume and uses redirected instead of direct I/O. With redirection, storage operations are no longer through a host’s direct SAN connection, but are instead routed
    through the CSV coordinator. This has a direct impact on performance.
    CSV backup is serialized, so that only one virtual machine on a CSV is backed up at a time.
    In Windows Server 2012, these limitations were removed:
    Redirection is no longer used. 
    CSV backup is now parallel and not serialized.
    5) Yes, VSS and CBT would be used so data would be incremental after first initial "seed" backup. See:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff399619.aspx
    http://itsalllegit.wordpress.com/2013/08/05/dpm-2012-sp1-manually-copy-large-volume-to-secondary-dpm-server/
    I'd look at some other options. There are few good discussion you may want to read. See:
    http://arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1209963
    http://community.spiceworks.com/topic/316868-server-2012-2-node-cluster-without-san
    Good luck :)
    StarWind iSCSI SAN & NAS

  • SDDM 4.1 - Physical Storage Properties Not Appearing in DDL

    I have only had this problem while using 4.1, not 4.0. In Tools > Preferences > Data Modeler > DDL if have the "Include Storage in DDL" box checked, and I have a Storage Template assigned to my table in my physical model. However, when I preview my table's DDL, I do not see any of the physical storage properties included. This has not always been the case in 4.1. The first time I noticed that the storage properties did not appear, I closed SDDM and reopened it. This fixed my problem temporarily, but now I cannot get the storage properties to appear at all. Is this a bug with SDDM 4.1? Or am I doing something wrong? I did not have this problem in 4.0.

    Hi,
    A few things to check:
    1. The Physical Model that will be used in the DDL Preview is the one shown on the RDBMS Site property on the General tab of the Model Properties dialog for the Relational Model.
    (Right click on the entry for the Relational Model in the Browser and select Properties.)
    This gets updated whenever you do a full DDL Generation to refer to the Physical Model used in that DDL Generation.  (It's initial default value for a new Relational Model is Oracle Database 11g.)
    Make sure that this refers to the relevant Physical Model.  Update it if necessary.
    2. The relevant Physical Model must be open when you do the DDL Preview.
    3. As well as the "Include Storage in DDL" option there are additional options for each individual storage clause.
       These appear on the Data Modeler > DDL > DDL/Storage page of the Preferences.  The relevant options here need to be checked as well.
    If there still seems to be a problem, please let us know, together with any extra details you can provide.
    Thanks,
    David

  • Oracle 9i - Physical Storage

    Hello,
    I am new to Oracle and I need to find a way to move the physical storage of an oracle installation to a NAS device.
    Currenty I have an oracle 91 instance running on a linux box.. unfortunately this box is running out of space..so I need to move only the physical storage to the NAS device..(Dell PowerVault NAS) I would still manage the oracle instance only thru my linux box.. this way I can store more data on my oracle instance
    any help on this highly appreciated!
    Vanniarajan

    Leave the Oracle software on Linux. Your instance will continue to be hosted on Linux. All you would be doing is moving the dbf from the linux box to the NAS. NAS contains a file system which is created by the vendor's software. You do not install any OS on it. Make sure you have a valid backup before moving, just in case.
    For example, we have a NetApp SAN box here. All the dbf of my 8i and 9i databases are on it and I have a Windows 2000 Server hosting the 8i instances and a Windows 2003 server hosting the 9i databases.

  • Physical storage Checks

    Can any body forward me the PL/SQL commands to check Physical storage.
    I want to check how much physical storage we have free,
    Secondly , i want to check other storage like tablespace & any other storage we should keep checking for our db maintenance...
    Neep suggestions

    This is a SQL plus script that can be modified to be used on PLSQL, the script returns tablespace space used,free.
    -- tablespace_size.sql
    -- This SQL Plus script lists tablespace space used
    -- Parameter:
    -- &1: Display order by:
    --      1:tablespace name
    --     2:total mbytes
    --     3:used Mb
    --     4:free mb
    --     5:% used
    --     6:% free
    SET lines 300
    SET feedback off
    SET verify off
    SET pages 40
    COLUMN pct_used format 999.9 heading "%|Used"
    COLUMN pct_free format 999.9 heading "%|Free"
    COLUMN name format a16 heading "Tablespace Name"
    COLUMN mbytes format 999,999,999 heading "Total|MB"
    COLUMN used format 999,999,999 heading "Used|MB"
    COLUMN free format 999,999,999 heading "Free|MB"
    COLUMN largest format 999,999,999 heading "Largest"
    BREAK on report
    COMPUTE sum of mbytes on report
    COMPUTE sum of free on report
    COMPUTE sum of used on report
    PROMPT Order by:
    PROMPT     1:tablespace name
    PROMPT     2:total mbytes
    PROMPT     3:used Mb
    PROMPT 4:free mb
    PROMPT     5:% used
    PROMPT 6:% free
    SELECT NVL (b.tablespace_name, NVL (a.tablespace_name, 'UNKOWN')) NAME,
    mbytes_alloc mbytes, mbytes_alloc - NVL (mbytes_free, 0) used,
    NVL (mbytes_free, 0) free,
    ((mbytes_alloc - NVL (mbytes_free, 0)) / mbytes_alloc)
    * 100 pct_used,
    100
    - (((mbytes_alloc - NVL (mbytes_free, 0)) / mbytes_alloc) * 100)
    pct_free
    FROM (SELECT SUM (BYTES) / 1024 / 1024 mbytes_free, tablespace_name
    FROM SYS.dba_free_space
    GROUP BY tablespace_name) a,
    (SELECT SUM (BYTES) / 1024 / 1024 mbytes_alloc, tablespace_name
    FROM SYS.dba_data_files
    GROUP BY tablespace_name) b
    WHERE a.tablespace_name(+) = b.tablespace_name
    UNION ALL
    SELECT f.tablespace_name,
    SUM (ROUND ((f.bytes_free + f.bytes_used) / 1024 / 1024, 2)
    ) "total MB",
    SUM (ROUND (NVL (p.bytes_used, 0) / 1024 / 1024, 2)) "Used MB",
    SUM (ROUND ( ((f.bytes_free + f.bytes_used) - NVL (p.bytes_used, 0)
    / 1024
    / 1024,
    2
    ) "Free MB",
    (SUM (ROUND (NVL (p.bytes_used, 0) / 1024 / 1024, 2)) * 100)
    / (SUM (ROUND ((f.bytes_free + f.bytes_used) / 1024 / 1024, 2))),
    100
    - (SUM (ROUND (NVL (p.bytes_used, 0) / 1024 / 1024, 2)) * 100)
    / (SUM (ROUND ((f.bytes_free + f.bytes_used) / 1024 / 1024, 2)))
    FROM SYS.v_$temp_space_header f,
    dba_temp_files d,
    SYS.v_$temp_extent_pool p
    WHERE f.tablespace_name(+) = d.tablespace_name AND f.file_id(+) = d.file_id
    AND p.file_id(+) = d.file_id
    GROUP BY f.tablespace_name
    ORDER BY &1
    /

  • Physical storage types

    I have  a question....
    are the interim storage areas physical storage areas or just dummy areas we use to update the stock when GI and GR happens and to clear differences.... I know tht putwaway strats and picking strats are not defined for these/... So I am thinking these are just dummy storage areas we define to handle Negative stocks etc... Am I wrong... Please correct me

    Hello
    The interim storage types are physical or logical depending upon the client business process.
    Normally big warehouses having these interim storage types and the goods will unloaded and then sent to inpsection or they will repacking or skidding or lebelling will be done and then transferred to the storage bins. Similarly goods will be picked from different storage type to interim storage location and then delivered to teh customer.
    Warm regards
    Ramarkishna

  • Updating Storage for FCSrvr Down The Road

    Hi,
    we are seriously considering investing in FCSrvr in the near future and my sense from reading the manuals and perusing this and other forums is that it will serve our immediate and medium-term needs well. (I work for an content creation startup with 4 FCP systems currently in sneakernet ****.)
    I am trying to ascertain how FCSrvr would handle a change in the physical storage media that it references for its devices. In other words, if I start off with, say, a regular SATA hard drive (or RAIDed SATA set) to store my primary representation files and later decide to update to an external RAID for that data, how big of a pain is this? Is it simply a matter of naming the new storage medium the same as the old one and copying all FCSrvr files onto it? Is FCSrvr simply looking at the network path (/Volumes/DriveName/FolderName) or is it identifying these media differently somehow?
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Henrik Boes

    The system we have running works well for us. We have an xraid attached to FCSvr. It's where all our commonly used files live. We've filled up our xraid. No more room. So we bought a drobo, connected it to the server, and now we have another 3 or so TB.
    I've archived all our less used stuff off to the drobo, freed up room on our fast drives, and all the archived stuff is still searchable and easy to recall. The drobo ran us about $1400 CDN, so as we grow, we can add more without the huge expense of fast arrays.

  • Can i upgrade icloud storage for secondary account?

    My secondary account is used mostly for email.  I deleted a ton of them but somehow am still voer the 5GB limit.
    I'm willing to pay the $100 upgrade to get rid of the hassle, but is theere a way to upgrade icloud storage for your secondary account?

    You would probably have to temporarily make the secondary account the primary account to upgrade it.  To do this, go to System Preferences>Mail,Contacts,Calendars...delete the secondary account, then go to System Preferences>iCloud, sign out of your primary account and choose Delete at all of the prompts (your data will still be in iCloud), then sign back in with your secondary account ID and upgrade the storage.
    After upgrading the secondary account storage, reverse the procedure to assign the primary and secondary accounts back the way they were.

  • Can you use a iTunes card to purchase more storage for iCloud

    can you use a itunes card to purchase more storage for icloud

    No. iTunes Store only.
    "An iTunes Gift Card lets you shop for anything at the iTunes Store "  >  http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/giftcards/itunes/gallery

  • I'm trying to upgrade my iCloud storage for the new price.

    I'm trying to upgrade my iCloud storage for the new price, but it doesn't gives me the option of 20G for $0.99 a month.
    How can I get 20g for $0.99 a month?
    Thanks!

    Katherine,
    have you read the message in the panel? Something is wrong with your credit card. Perhaps you have to enter a new date of expiration.
    In the small print it says, there is still a purchase, that needs paying,"Ugly Heart" with an amount of R 9.99. And "We were unable to authorise your credit card for this purchase".  You will first have to update your Billing Information before you can proceed to make a new purchase for upgraded storage.  Click "Account Details" in the iCloud panel.
    -- Léonie
    If you cannot fix the account from the iCloud panel, open iTunes and sign into the "Store" menu, Then use the "Store > View account" item there to check for problems with your Billing Information.

  • Can I pay for addition iCloud storage for my family member

    I want to buy more storage for my children, but I don't want to connect my credit card to their iCloud accounts. I've added them as the family members, could I pay for their iCloud through family sharing?

    Your children's accounts currently have some account information with them ... so just put in your card data, do the charge, and then change it back to the account info they have now, and then your card is off the account.

  • What's the best way to setup a media server/central storage for all of my?

    I was wondering what the best way to achieve a central media server for all my iTunes content + iPhoto's, calendar syncing and contact sharing is? This is what I currently have:
    iMac 20" Aluminum + External HD Backup (kids)
    Macbook Black (wife)
    Macbook Pro 15" (me)
    Airport Extreme 802.11n (obvious)
    TimeCapsule 1TB (wifi backup for wife/me)
    I would like to replace my PC in my office with a brand new Mac Pro Nehalem 8-Core, 8GB Ram, and 4TB, and replace my PC laptop in my living room attached to my tv, with an Apple TV.
    I want to centralize all our Photos from vacations, etc. Music, videos, movies, that are currently split up over wife's macbook, kids imac and my macbook pro onto my soon to be purchased Mac Pro.
    I want to be able to stream everything from my living room via Apple TV for when guests come over, dinner parties, etc. (plus I love apple and it keeps things clean)
    I'm currently using MobileMe to sync all of our Calendars and Contacts with my main account, which is great, but MobileMe doesn't sync to family members accounts =
    What would I need to do to centralize all this onto my future Mac Pro so that everyone has access all the time when they are home and the key here is, modify/update/change from their machines and sync it back/update it on the Mac Pro.
    Also, I'm hoping Snow Leopard has some changes to iTunes to make this a little more possible, since we're right around the corner from this release. I don't really want to spend an additional $900+ on Snow Leopard Server to have to achieve these results, but if it makes it easier, and does the job, then I guess I might. This is all speculation though, since it's not out yet. I'd like to get this all sorted and setup within the next month.
    I was considering a Drobo, they say they can throw up iTunes Server but, I appreciate everyone for reading this, and taking the time to respond!
    Thanks!
    Message was edited

    I'm in the process of setting up a smaller (and cheaper) but somewhat similar setup to what you want to do, so maybe one example might help point you in the right direction. My needs consist of a centralized location for data storage, which will include iPhoto libraries (I keep two separate ones), iTunes (which I also want served to the home theater system), something other than my laptop to play internet videos and downloaded content on my TV, all with ideally the lowest cost and energy use possible.
    My solution was the new Mini with a FW800 external drive as the server/media hub and Airport gigabit as the network hub (it also handles the backup drive).
    FW800 is fast enough to saturate a gigabit ethernet link, so I don't consider that much of a bottleneck. The Mini then has iTunes running at all times with its centralized library on it; it is hooked to the home theater via HDMI-DVI video and optical audio, so it can play music and also handle videos when desired; Front Row with the Apple remote is close enough to an AppleTV that I think it handles that well, and it's more full-featured than an AppleTV. It can further be used to display photos/slideshows/whatever on the TV for guests or such, or to surf from the couch with a wireless mouse/keyboard. You can also toss in an EyeTV for $150 and use that as a DVR if you feel like it.
    When I want to edit photos or such on my desktop, the gigabit link is fast enough that I can run iPhoto without noticing any significant slowdown. Its also usable over wireless, though I have a dangling extra network cable to plug into a laptop for full gigabit speed if need be. iTunes, of course, shares its library, which can be played from any of the computers in the house if so desired (iPhoto can do that too if you just want to display).
    If I REALLY wanted top speed (though I've even done video editing in iMovie via ethernet without issue), I could use a third party synch app (I like Sync) to mirror any of the content from the mini server to a local drive; this works fine with anything but multi-way synching, such as address books being modified in different locations. I'd probably try to set up one of those Mobile Me clone systems or use a 3rd party app if I needed to do that.
    Again, maybe this isn't powerful enough or "synched" enough in terms of local storage for your taste, but the advantage is that a Mini uses a minute fraction of the power of a Mac Pro, so you're saving a lot on electricity if the computer will be powered up at all times as a server, and it's also a lot more full-featured as a home theater media hub than an AppleTV. And, heck, the thing is about as well equipped as my old top-of-the-line G5 tower for a 5th the cost and 1/15th the power and noise.

  • T-code WV31 create physical inventory for vendor consignment stock

    Hi all,
    I have some issue with T-code WV31i n Sap Retail. Even though it supposed to create physical inventory doc for unrestricted use stock, it also create physical inventory Docs for special stocks (vendor consignment stock). What could be the reason?
    Best regards
    Sameera
    Edited by: Sameera on Dec 23, 2011 7:07 AM

    Hi,
    If i do physical inventory for 2 quantity.
    1. Consignment Payables account debited with 2 qty ( Now stock becomes 4 nos)
    If i issue 4 quantity
    2. Consignment Payables account credited with 4 qty.
    If i do consignment settelment, it is setteling 4-2 (for 2 quantity).
    But I want to settele for 4 quantity.
    Thanks,
    Maruthi

  • I just purchased extra storage for my iCloud.  How and where do I access it?  I purchased movies and audio books to find out that I didn't have enough storage (the reason for the extra storage purchase).  I have no idea where to find them now.  Help?!

    How do I use my iCloud???
    I purchased 4 movies and 2 audio books from iTunes only to find out my iPad2 didn't have enough storage, so I purchased more storage from iCloud. 
    My iTunes account only shows the 4 movies that need to still be downloaded (not the two books)  After purchasing 20GB from iCloud I am still receiving the  "There is not enough available storage.  You can manage your storage in Settings" message.  I have gone to my Settings, where it shows I have the new, extra storage.  I have set all the iCloud settings as shown on the Apple website.  In my iCloud settings, it shows I have 17GB available out of 25GB.   In my General settings, it shows that I have a capacity of 28.6 GB, while my Available is 2.9GB.  (????)
    I don't know why I still can't download the movies.  I wouldn't know where to go (how to get to) the iCloud if I could...
    Also, iTunes has sent me receipts for the movies and audio books I purchased as well.  Where are they???
    Thank you SO very much for any assistance you can offer me!

    Cancel your storage upgrade
    If you upgrade or renew your storage but no longer need it, you can cancel. If you cancel your storage plan within 15 days of an upgrade or within 45 days after a yearly payment, you can contact Apple for a full refund. After this period, you can downgrade your storage for the following year.
    Note:  Partial refunds are available where required by law.
    From here  >  http://help.apple.com/icloud/?lang=en#mma3518f8580
    HelpKimIsAlreadyTaken wrote:
    Since I purchased about $70 worth of movies and books and they won't load onto my iPad, do you think iTunes will refund my money?
    If you make more room on your Device perhaps you can View/ use the purchases...
    However if you would prefer a Refund... you can always ask... be sure to explain your situation...
    To Contact iTunes Customer Service and request assistance
    Use this Link  >  Apple  Support  iTunes Store  Contact
    Note:
    It is stated that all sales are final

  • I just bought 200 gb storage for my phone and it still says i cant download apps because "theres no enough storage" i dont get why, plz hep me out!!!

    i just bought 200 GB storage for my phone and it still says i cant download apps because "there's no enough storage" i don't get why, plz hep me out!!!

    It means that you need to delete content from the device before you can add more.
    (115750)

Maybe you are looking for