PI 7.0 with SRM-SUS

Hello:
We want to install SRM-SUS and integrate it with MM and with other SRM installation. As we know we need PI for the integration. We've PI 7.0. Do you know if we need to migrate to 7.1 or the standard interfases for SAP-SUS can use PI 7.0 ?
Thanks in advance.
Fernando.

Hello:
We want to install SRM 7.01, is this version compatible with PI 7.0?. We suppose it, but it's a very recent version and we want to confirm this point.
Thanks again.

Similar Messages

Classic Scenarion with MM-SUS (SUS-ECC-SRM/EBP)

Hi SRM Gurus,
We are going for SRM Classic Scenario with MM-SUS . SRM 7.0 with ECC 6.0 (Ehp4).
Here ECC will be connected to SRM and SUS ,i..e SUS-ECC-SRM.
I learnt that Classic deployment supports MM-SUS scenario. It means that , every document created in ECC or SRM(EBP) need to replicate in other 2 systems. I have concerns about this replication in 2 another systems.
1. PO-S/C in SRM , creates classic PO in ECC Is this PO sends to SUS ?
2. Confirmation-Is Confirmation done in ECC/SUS/SRM replicates in another 2 systems ?
3. Invoice-Is Invoice done in ECC/SUS/SRM replicates in another 2 systems ?
Can anyone please confirm /suggest , whether this happens or not ?
Regards
NAP

Narendra
I learnt that Classic deployment supports MM-SUS scenario. It means that , every document created in ECC or SRM(EBP) need to replicate in other 2 systems. I have concerns about this replication in 2 another systems. - EVERY DOCUMENT IS NOT CREATED IN 2 OTHER SYSTEMS. SRM PO GOES TO ECC AS CLASSIC PO. THIS CLASSIC PO IS SENT TO SUS WHERE IT CREATES A SALES ORDER FOR VENDOR. SO ITS NOT REALLY EVERY DOCUMENT IN TWO OTHER SYSTEMS
1. PO-S/C in SRM , creates classic PO in ECC Is this PO sends to SUS ? - ECC PO WILL BE SENT TO SUS. SRM-ECC INTERFACE REMAINS SAME HERE. THERE IS NO COMMUNICATION BETWEEN SRM AND SUS
2. Confirmation-Is Confirmation done in ECC/SUS/SRM replicates in another 2 systems ? - CONFIRMATION CAN BE DONE EITHER IN SUS(RECOMMENDED), OR IN SRM, OR IN ECC. CONFIRMATION CREATED IN SRM AND SUS WILL RESULT IN CREATION OF GOODS MOVEMENT IN ECC. GOODS MOVEMENT CREATED IN ECC WILL BE ONLY UPDATED AS A KIND OF FOLLOW ON DOCUMENT IN SUS AND SRM
3. Invoice-Is Invoice done in ECC/SUS/SRM replicates in another 2 systems ? - INVOICECAN BE DONE EITHER IN SUS(RECOMMENDED), OR IN SRM, OR IN ECC. INVOICE CREATED IN SRM AND SUS WILL RESULT IN CREATION OF MM INVOICE IN ECC. INVOICE CREATED IN ECC WILL BE ONLY UPDATED AS A KIND OF FOLLOW ON DOCUMENT IN SUS AND SRM
I hope it clears your doubts....
Regards
virender Singh

The Po Changed XML Message is in Error in SRM SUS

Dear Experts,
We are integrating ECC to SRM SUS system, and PO was successfully processed from PI and in SRM SUS we are getting below error.
<namespace="http://sap.com/xi/SRM/SE/Global">ExchangeFaultData</SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage>
<SAP:Stack>Application has thrown an exception</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
And the message is in Inbound Q with status u201CXI Error Application Error .ABAP:Queue Stoppedu201D
Observed that messege was sucessfully processed from PI, and in error it is showing as XI Error.
Please help us to resolve the issue.
Thanks in Advance,
Soumya.

Hello,
What you can do is:
1.) Look for the name of the queue in SXI_MONITOR of SUS System
2.) Go to tcode SMQ2
3.) Input the name of your queue there
4.) Unlock your queue
Hope this helps,
Mark

Data Consistency when Copying/ Refreshing ECC 6.0 and SRM-SUS 5.0 Systems

Hello,
We are planning a refresh / system copy of an ECC 6.0 and SRM-SUS 5.0 system
The refreshes will be completed from backups taken of production systems refreshed onto the QA Landscape.
I have referenced the following SDN thread that provides some guidelines on how to refresh R/3 and SRM systems and maintain data consistency between the systems using BDLS and changing entries that correspond to backend RFC destinations:
[Is there a process/program to update tables/data after System Refresh?;
This thread is fairly old and relates to earlier versions of R/3 (4.7) and SRM (3.0). We have heard that at higher system versions there may be technical reasons why a refresh canu2019t be performed.
Does anyone have experience of completing successful refreshes of landscape that contain ECC and SRM systems at higher SAP versions (ideally ECC 6.0 and SRM-SUS 5.0) Does anyone know whether it is technically possible?
Are there any additional steps that we need to be aware of at these higher SAP versions in completing the copy to ensure that the data remains consistent between ECC and SRM?
Thanks
Frances

I have seen this somewhere in the forum: See if this helps you
BDLS: Convertion of logical system (SRM).
Check entry in table TWPURLSVR.
Check RFC connections (R/3 and SRM)
SPRO, check or set the following points:
Set up Distribution Model and distribute it
Define backend system
Define backend sytem per product category
Setting for vendor synchronization
Numbe ranges
Define object in backend sytem
Define external services (catalogs)
Check WF customizing: SWU3, settings for tasks
SICF: maintain the service BBPSTART, SAPCONNECT
SE38:
Run SIAC_PUBLISH_ALL_INTERNAL
Run BBP_LOCATIONS_GET_ALL
Update vendor BBPUPDVD
Check Middleware if used.
Run BBP_GET_EXRATE.
Schedule jobs (bbp_get_status2, clean_reqreq_up)
Convert attributes with RHOM_ATTRIBUTE_REPLACE

Service procurement from SRM-SUS

HI,
Pl guide me how to procure services from SRM-sus
Say supplier performs the services and confirmation in SRM-SUS so that SES will be created in R/3
and SES approval in R/3 and send back the SES no to SRM-sus.
pl share is thesre any documents regarding process flows etc
thanks
Rami

hi,
I Have created the service order with service activity in ECC6 and send the Idoc to SRM(version5)
in SRM i am not able to view the Serive Details. only item overview discription with 1 AU is displaying.
i want create ASN for actual service perofrmed by vendor.
EX PO item overview
item 10- painting at E Block 1 au value 1000
item details
activity no 100000000 - painting at E16.- 10 QTY- rs 100 and net value 1000
because i want to create ASN for 1 Qty,value Rs 100. how to get these details in portal?
system created inbound delivery after i have create the ASN in SRM . actually i want to create SES.
is there any confi required(process code etc).
help required
regds
Rami reddy

Change the standard XI content for SRM SUS scenario

Hello everyone,
I am implementing the "Plan driven procurement with supplier integration" scenario which integrates the SAP R/3 and SRM-SUS.
I have imported the standard XI content available on service market place for the scenario.
Now i have to modify the scenario. I have to add some additional fields in the inbound message for purchase order request.
The proxy classes for these interfaces were already created in the SRM system.
So now after changing the message type what all things i shd take care of e.g like creating the proxy newly etc.
Thanks and Regards
Rahul Nawale

Hi Shabarish,
Thanks for your reply, but i have a couple of more questions.
1.I can find a function module called from the method present in the proxy class generated.
METHOD ii_bbpx1_preq_request_in~execute_asynchronous.
CALL FUNCTION 'BBP_SAPXML1_EXTREQU_UPDATE_IN'
EXPORTING
is_purchreq_request = input.
ENDMETHOD.
so since i am changing the purchase order request do i have to do any changes in the function module as well.
In the function module Proxy Structures are mapped to the API Structures and then the API is called using BBP_API_EXTREQU_UPDATE function module.
Thanks and Regards
Rahul Nawale

SRM -SUS

HI,
Iam working on SRM 5.0 and Bi 7.0,
We implemented SUS in SRM and Getting Po's from R/3 to SRMm, so the thing is we Dint implememt EBP in SRM.
Now i want to Implement the same in BI system, Sap has few dats ources given for SRM,But unable to load them to BI as because EBP is required and Without EBP the data sources defined By SAP are not Compatable to Just SUS scenario..
i just want to Know is there anyone who had implemented SRM-SUS(Only Sus without EBP as we did ) and BW.
Can anyone guide me are let me know how the configuration took place..
Appropriate solution will be heavily rewarded.
Bye,
JSK.

Hello,
SUS is an add on software component for SRM.
e.g. For SRM server 5.5 SUS 3.0 is installed.
When SUS is required you need XI to be also installed.
Because for EBP , SUS becomes external system and you need to send messages in XML format only which is job of XI.
SUS is basically meant for external business partners i.e.suppliers
with SUS in picture ,the same can be used for supplier users creation , PO/SA confirmation, sending ASN shipping notification, Send invoices.
So basically used for supplier collabration.
I will send you some matl on yr ID.
BR
Dinesh
Reward if helps

SRM-SUS Scenerio Replicating company code and suppliers to SUS via XI

We have configured SRM-SUS scenario. We have SRM and SUS on the same system but different clients. We have configured extended classic scenario. We are on SRM 2007 with SP5
Issue:
When I execute transaction BBP_SP_COMP_INI I get no errors. I check SXMB_MONI in my SUS client and it has processed correctly. However it does not update table BBP_SUS_BPCMPMAP. I check SLG1 in SRM and SUS and get messages that data replicated.
When I execute transaction BBP_SP_SUPP_INI to move the SRM suppliers to SUS I check SXMB_MONI and everything processed correctly. However, when I check table VENMAP there are no entries.
I then create a PO and send to SUS. I get the following error:
Error in an XI interface: No partner found for partner number VNDR_ACCT_ Program: SAPLBBP_BD_VALUE_MAPPING; Include: LBBP_BD_VALUE_MAPPINGF11; Line: 436
When we debug the proxy it is trying to validate our SRM company code (VNDR_ACCT) in table BBP_SUS_BPCMPMAP which is empty.
It appears that SUS is not allowing the creation of external partners. Does SRM to SUS transfers utilize the BP number range table which distinguishes external and internal BPs which is used when replicating suppliers between ECC and SRM.
Has anyone ever encountered this issue before?
Please advise.
Thanks.
Joe

Hello Nikhil:
I think my issue is that the XI proxys' are not being updated in SUS. It appears to me that it is similar to when you are executing BBPGETVD between ECC and SUS (MM-SUS) and the BP number range in SUS is not set to accept external BPs.
So, When I execute BBP_SP_SUPP_INI and send SRM suppliers to SUS how does it know the VG5XXXXXXX. When I replicate BBPGETVD I tell the VG5XXXXXXXX. I did configure the "Managing Business Partners" SUS configuration but we are not using supplier registration so I do not have URL for UM or Notification. I did update the "Central Vendor Group" , "Default Purchase Org", and "Currency". Does XI use this setting to know where to assign the vendors or is there another piece of configuration I missed?
What I did to create the entry in table BBP_SUS_BPCMPMAP is I executed transaction BBP_SUS_BP_ADM and entered in the "Company Code" field the BP from my SRM system assigned to my ECC backend company code . In the log sys field I entered the log sys of my SRM cleint. I then completed the other required fields. In the end it created the following entry:
101 4CF3AE33A6036B71E10000000AF8EF08 ERACLNT100 0001 0000000018
Client 100 is SRM and 101 is SUS.
I am able to configure SUS for MM_SUS and replicate suppliers and company code from ECC to SUS. However, this does not use XI. For thois reason I think my issue is a missing piece of config to tell XI where to create external business partners?
When I check the payload of my SRM PO it does not show the company code but uses BP 18 which is the SRM BP for my backend company code. When I check BBP_PD for this PO in SRM it has my company code as "BE CO_ CODE"
Do you have any more suggestions?
Please advise.
Thanks.
Joe

SRM SUS Supplier operating in more countries?

Hi all.
SRM SUS 7.0
We are implementing SRM SUS, and my question is quite simple: A vendor that in ECC has more than 1 purchasing organization, how can I distinguish among those in SUS so that not all contact persons are receiving the PO?
I would expect to simply use either the purchasing org or company code, but the organizational setup for SUS is so limited, that the EKORG og BUK are not even considered.
Supplier ABC operates in EKORG 1 and 2; with 1 overall SAP vendor number. That's standard. In SUS the supplier is created in the PPOMV_BBP with no respect to BUK, and EKORG is not even a parameter/an attribute you can use while creating the vendor org units. When the supplier is replicated to SUS, it is created in PPOMV_BBP. Then you create a contact person in SUS to let SRM know who to send the PO for this vendor number to. However, the contact person does - again - not take either BUK or EKORG into consideration.
I can only see that if you use SAP ECC with 1 overall vendor number for multiple purchasing organizations, then SUS will not be able to distinguish and send the "New PO in SUS" info to the right contact persons, since there seem to be no organizational setup for SRM SUS...
I hope I am overlooking something simple, so any input is valid!

Hi Sam.
Thanks for the input. However, what you state is not accurate for our scenario at least. In MN04 we simply control the output conditions in ECC - however, for our MM-SUS implementation given our current ECC/SRM releases, we use XML out from ECC and into SRM again; not regular output conditions.
And my issue is still the following:
Functional scenario:
Supplier called ABC operationg in 2 countries but with 1 overall vendor number
Contact Person 1 created for vendor; this is in pur org 200
Contact Person 2 created for vendor; this is in pur org 300
Contact 1 should only see POs in pur org 200 in SUS; Contact 2 should only see POs in pur org 300 in SUS.
In ECC, this would be vendor ABC and create him in the 2 different pur orgs; no problem. In SUS, however, the vendor master (or BP) does not use the purchasing org in any case. And when creating the contact person in SUS for the overall vendor ABC, there is no org maintenance either. Therefore, all POs from ECC to SUS will be sent to both contact 1 and 2 because SUS does not seem to know how to handle 1 vendor number with multiple purchasing organizations.
This sounds strange to me! Any other input?
Edited by: Solar SCM on Jan 10, 2012 12:05 PM

PO replication from SRM to SRM -SUS

Hello Guys
How to replicate a PO from SRM to SRM SUS Client in case of PO created in SRM SUS scenario.
Any configuration and back ground job needs to be scheduled. Also for the corresponding documents from SRM to SUS and Vice versa.
Second, why middle ware PI is used for replication of vendors from SRM to SRM SUS as they both deploy on same system with different client.
Please reply guys
Thanks.
Edited by: santhosh.s on Feb 13, 2012 8:53 AM
Edited by: santhosh.s on Feb 13, 2012 8:53 AM
Edited by: santhosh.s on Feb 13, 2012 8:57 AM

Hi Santosh,
As you are using extended classic scenario for transferring PO from SRM EBP to SRM SUS.
You can schedule a report RSPPFPROCESS for every minute with following varient
Application - BBP_PD
Action Profile - BBP_PD_PO
Action Defination - STANDARD_PO
Promotion Status - (0) Not Processed
and also select Processing withhout dialog checkbox.
Regards,
Pawan Keshwani

SAP eSourcing with SRM Extended Classic Scenario

Hi Team,
We are using ECC 6.0 with eSourcing. Currently we use SRM 5.0 with Classic Scenario.
Now we are planning an upgrade from SRM 5.5 to SRM 7.0 and want to do the Extended Classic Scenario. This will help us to do additional functionalities of SRM.
eSourcing can be used for Strategic RFx and CLM functionalities.
SRM can be used for SC, Operational Sourcing and PO. We can also use the SRM-SUS Scenario for PO confirmation and Invoices.
Have any one used eSourcing with SRM Extended Classic? In that case, please provide some light into how to use all these application to better streamline the overall Source to Procure strategy.
Also, do you think Classic is the way to go or Extended Classic is better? Any documents or pictures are greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Jogy

Hi
SAP provide standard integration b/w ECC and Esourcing/ CLM (PR (both inbound and outbound). However in case you decide to go with extended classic scenario,you might need e Sourcing/ CLM integration with SRM (since PO would be created in SRM) which is not provided out of the box by SAP. However custom interface (based on flat file transfer) can be built b/w SAP SRM and e Sourcing.
MM-SUS scenario is not much different from EBP-SUS scenario in terms of functionality.
Regards
Mudit Saini

Supplier Self Service (SRM-SUS)

Hi All,
does anyone have or no of a definite list of which SRM-SUS fucntionality is available in
Extended Classic Scenario
Classic Scenario
Standalone
What I'm trying to find out is which scenarios the following are available in:
PO exchange from EBP to SUS
Catalogue Content Management via SUS
Supplier Goods Receipting via SUS
Supplier Invoice Receupting via SUS
Cheers
Chris

please refer to the follwoing
·        The classic scenario
The shopping cart is created and approved in SAP Enterprise Buyer. The remainder of the procurement process takes place in the backend ERP system(s) and all other follow-on documents, such the purchase order, goods receipt/service entry sheet and invoice, are located there. With SAP Supplier Self-Services, you have partial supplier involvement for the operational procurement business scenarios when buying materials. There is no support for services.
·        The extended classic scenario
The shopping cart is created in SAP Enterprise Buyer. The purchase order and follow-on documents are also created there and then replicated to the backend system. The purchase order in SAP Enterprise Buyer is the leading purchase order and cannot be changed in the backend system. Goods receipts and invoices can be pre-entered in SAP Enterprise Buyer or entered directly in the backend system. With SAP Supplier Self-Services, you have partial supplier involvement for all your operational procurement scenarios. In these scenarios, you have supplier involvement for the purchase order and the purchase order response.
·        The standalone scenario
The shopping cart and purchase order are processed directly in SAP Enterprise Buyer. You have no materials management functions in your ERP system and, instead, use those in SAP Enterprise Buyer for all procurement processes. The final invoice is sent to a backend accounting system. With SAP Supplier Self-Services, you have complete supplier involvement for all your operational procurement scenarios

SRM-SUS RFC Destinations for matching of user data.

Hi,
A customizing question...
I get SRM and SUS in separated boxes... SRM is with all the SAP landscape (R/3, XI, MDM, etc..) and SUS in the DMZ to allow vendors to reach the web site....
So, there's an activity to setup the connection to replicate the bidders created in SUS to SRM...
the IMG activity is: SPRO-> SRM -> SUS -> Technical settings -> Define RFC destinations fot matching of user data.
There are 4 parameters to input:
Destination -> (SRDCLNT400).
System name -> (SRM)
FM BPID -> (empty)
Role -> (SAP_EC_BBP_BIDDER)
So, my question is: What's the name of the FM that should input here FM BPID?
I think that it is a FM in SRM side, but i don't know how to find it, is there any documentation about this RFC?
All your replies will be appreciated and rewarded if useful...
Regards,
Gerardo.

Nishant,
BBP_SUS_BUPA_REGID_CHECK is the FM in charge to check out the string generated by the system for a vendor that was invited to register tu SUS via email... so i don't think that it will work..
Let me redefine my question cuz maybe it is not so clear...
When you invite a vendor, he will register and will get an administrator user, with which he will create more users (bidders) to review and post quotes.... But, since the bid engine is independent from SUS (at SRM side) the SUS user will need to be replicated at SRM with same user name and password... Then when they go to the BID option in SUS menu a new browser window will prompt for login...
If you are running SUS in a different box from SRM, there's an IMG activity to setup the RFC name to replicate the user names with bidder role.. This is the step where i'm stuck, cuz in the documentation there isn't any references to this RFC...
So, if you have something that will help me, please reply, i will reward useful answers...
Gerardo.

SRM-SUS for Service Entry Sheets - Classic Scenario

Hi SRM Gurus,
Our client wants to use SRM-SUS for the Service Entry Sheets (to being with and then later expand more in other SRM areas). The lead system will be R/3 system.
We will be going with ECC 6.0 and SRM 5.0.
Service Order will be created in R/3 and replicated into SRM (SAP have said this is new functionality in SRM 2007 and SAP will provide us with this functionality in SRM 5.0 as well)
SAP are also recommending using MDM for hosting the catalogs for service entry sheets to enable vendors to selete their items during the confirmation / filling the service entry sheets. - they say this is mandatory
SAP are also asking for XI for the data to be transferred from R/3 to SRM (and may be vice versa) - they say this is mandatory.
Few questions:
1) What kind of hardware size are we talking about to have SRM-SUS, MDM, XI and Portal (PI)
2) Are MDM and XI mandatory as said by SAP and if yes, in what scenarios. What is they way around
3) How good is the functionality provided by SRM-SUS for Services? Is it as good as in R/3 (or even better)? We will be having complex Services in our scnearios.
4) What can be a typical time to install SRM-SUS, MDM, XI and Portal in the Dev environment to get moving onto the project?
An early response shall be highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Rahul

few answers to your questions
1) what is the release of SRM you want to work with?
2) services in SUS is not available as standard , and will be provided by SAP as consulting up on request.
3) for hardware requirements , please refer to the master guide for the srm release you will be working on -->
and also you can refer to the software component matrix in master guide --> to see if any component is mandatory..
4) XI and MDM as far as i know is mandatory for SRM 6.0 and above , But in SRM 5.0 , XI is compulsory.
5) so xi is mandatory in anyway in SUS as different systems are involved and therefore is required for routing the documents correctly.
6) time for installation again depends on your supplier base , and your level of expertise.
7) it is not always recommended to compare between two different systems , R/3 and SUS are different and so functionality will not be the same
8) but as far as i know R/3 is stronger functioanlly..

SRM - SUS, EBP,CCM,2007 Delta

Hi Gururs,
Could you please let me know what is meant by
SUS, EBP, CCM and 2007 Delta - all these are related to SRM
As i'm new and learning SRM i'd like to know the basic idea of the above
Regards
Bala
+91 98861 23202

Hi,
All are related to SRM
1)SRM SUS :: I SUS-Supplier Self Service.: In this vendor are linked with SAP SRM server the data will be exchanged from SAP SRM server to the vendor WEB based service and vice versa
Each vendor will be given a User ID & Password.
The vendor can logon to the webportal to access the data related to him like
1. Purchase order details.
2.Goods receipt details (or) Confirmation in SRM
3.Invoice details etc.
2) EBP : Enterprise buyer professional, before SAP introduced SRM the e procurement is used to be done in SAP EBP.Currently we are in SAP EBP 5.0 Version
3) SAP CCM :: Catalog Content Management. SAP CCM is to maintain catalogs.
Catalogue is a defined set of data will be published in the Itnernet (or) intranet.
If a shopping cart is to be raised you can take data from the catalogue.
in the catalog for each material , vendor ,price is there .
Once shopping cart is ordered and it is approved. in the BACKEND (SAP R/3) or in SAP EBP
itself P.O is created .It is a Big area
G.Ganesh Kumar

PI 7.0 with SRM-SUS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for