PI alert issue for synchrounous scenarios

Hi
I created alerts for synchronous scenario for mapping and adapterfailures but while testing its not triggering. however alerts triggered in Alert inbox when i test via 'rsalerttes't report.
if there is a mapping failure in request messag mapping alerts triggerring fine, but if there is a failure in response mapping alerts not triiggreing.
can some body explain how to create alert rule for respnse message mapping failures.
Regards,
Rajesh

Hi Aamir,
Thanks for information.
I checked in SLG1 it shows green symbol. and ALRTDISP it shows closed envelope.
In SXMB_MONI the mesage shows red symbol.
we are gettign below error in MONI in response SOAP Header but the alert not triggered.
<SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:Category>XIProxy</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="ABAP">PARSE_APPLICATION_DATA</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>Request Message</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2>CX_ST_DESERIALIZATION_ERROR</SAP:P2>
<SAP:P3>/1SAI/TXS00000000000000000035</SAP:P3>
if there is a fialure in request message pipeline steps the alert get triggered. how to trigger alerts for failures in SOAP Header, which is happening before pipeline steps started.
we tried No restriction option in Alert rule in RWB, but still PI is not able to trigger alert for this kind of error.
Regards,
Rajesh

Similar Messages

Alerts for a scenario in Advanced Adapter Engine

We have done an end to end scenario using advanced adapter engine in PI 7.1.
We have created an alert to give info abt an error which mite occur.
Do alerts work for messages which dont go to integration engine as the alert category is taken from abap stack?

Yes you can have alert mail/ message with AAE....just select where the error occured as Adapter Engine.

I rent a movie on iTune, dowloading on my ipad2, the movie stop reading from chapter 10, and an alert inform me when i try to Start the movie that i cannot read it. What is the issue for solve this problem?

I rent a movie on iTunes stores, downloading it to my iPad2, but during the movie, the reading stop from capter 10 to End. I try to restart it, but an alert message inform me that i cannot read the movie. What is the issue for solve this problem? The movie is still located on apps movie, but i cannot read it. Please help.

Having the same problem. Watched 25 minutes of a rental and it stopped with the message"unable to load video"
Using current version IPad mini.
Ios7 is HUGH PIECE OF CRAP!!!!

To configure alert for BPM scenario.

Hi Experts
I have one BPM scenario(Asyn-Syn-Asy).
I have created one alert category for this and defined 3 alert rules:
first rule from SAP to BPM
second from BPM to 3rd party which is synchronous
and third from BPM to SAP.
But when i create faulty message by mapping error, alert is not triggered.
Can anyone tell me where I m going wrong??
And what additional configuration is required to trigger alert??
Thanks
Edited by: danishahmed on Jan 18, 2012 2:06 PM

Hi Danish,
Control Step is required to capture exceptions. If there is any error in main branch then Integration Process looks for alternate branch to execute which in this case should be Control step.
This control step will throw alert which should already be defined in Alert Category of IR.
Steps -
1. Drag a BLOCK from tools pellete and assign to your main flow. Now this block will be having 2 branches.
One branch will contain main flow and other will contain control step.
2. Right Click on Block and Insert -> Exception Branch
3. Drag and Drop CONTROL inside exception branch
Now you can configure Alert as in above mentioned my EL Netweaver blog post.
- Mandeep Virk

SAP PI conceptual best practice for synchronous scenarios

Hi,
 Apologies for the length of this post but I'm sure this is an area most of you have thought about in your journey with SAP PI.
 We have recently upgraded our SAP PI system from 7.0 to 7.1 and I'd like to document best practice guidelines for our internal development team to follow.
I'd be grateful for any feedback related to my thoughts below which may help to consolidate my knowledge to date.
 Prior to the upgrade we have implemented a number of synchronous and asynchronous scenarios using SAP PI as the hub at runtime using the Integration Directory configuration.
No interfaces to date are exposes directly from our backend systems using transaction SOAMANAGER.
 Our asynchronous scenarios operate through the SAP PI hub at runtime which builds in resilience and harnesses the benefits of the queue-based approach.
 My queries relate to the implementation of synchronous scenarios where there is no mapping or routing requirement. Perhaps it's best that I outline my experience/thoughts on the 3 options and summarise my queries/concerns that people may be able to advise upon afterwards.
 1) Use SAP PI Integration Directory. I appreciate going through SAP PI at runtime is not necessary and adds latency to the process but the monitoring capability in transaction SXMB_MONI provide full access for audit purposes and we have implemented alerting running hourly so all process errors are raised and we handle accordingly. In our SAP PI Production system we have a full record of sync messages recorded while these don't show in the backend system as we don't have propogation turned on. When we first looked at this, the reduction in speed seemed to be outweighed by the quality of the monitoring/alerting given none of the processes are particularly intensive and don't require instant responses. We have some inbound interfaces called by two sender systems so we have the overhead of maintaing the Integration Repository/Directory design/configuration twice for these systems but the nice thing is SXMB_MONI shows which system sent the message. Extra work but seemingly for improved visibility of the process. I'm not suggesting this is the correct long term approach but states where we are currently.
 2) Use the Advanced Adapter Engine. I've heard mixed reviews about this functionaslity, there areh obvious improvements in speed by avoiding the ABAP stack on the SAP PI server at runtime, but some people have complained about the lack of SXMB_MONI support. I don't know if this is still the case as we're at SAP PI 7.1 EHP1 but I plan to test and evaluate once Basis have set up the pre-requisite RFC etc.
 3) Use the backend system's SOAP runtime and SOAMANAGER. Using this option I can still model inbound interfaces in SAP PI but expose these using transaction SOAMANAGER in the backend ABAP system. [I would have tested out the direct P2P connection option but our backend systems are still at Netweaver 7.0 and this option is not supported until 7.1 so that's out for now.] The clear benefits of exposing the service directly from the backend system is obviously performance which in some of our planned processes would be desirable. My understanding is that the logging/tracing options in SOAMANAGER have to be switched on while you investigate so there is no automatic recording of interface detail for retrospective review.
 Queries:
 I have the feeling that there is no clear cut answer to which of the options you select from above but the decision should be based upon the requirements.
 I'm curious to understand SAPs intention with these options -
 - For synchronous scenarios is it assumed that the client should always handle errors therefore the lack of monitoring should be less of a concern and option 3 desirable when no mapping/routing is required?
 - Not only does option 3 offer the best performance, but the generated WSDL is ready once built for any further system to implement thereby offering the maximum benefit of SOA, therefore should we always use option 3 whenever possible?
 - Is it intended that the AAE runtime should be used when available but only for asynchronous scenarios or those requiring SAP PI functionality like mapping/routing otherwise customers should use option 3? I accept there are some areas of functionality not yet supported with the AAE so that would be another factor.
 Thanks for any advice, it is much appreciated.
 Alan
Edited by: Alan Cecchini on Aug 19, 2010 11:48 AM
Edited by: Alan Cecchini on Aug 19, 2010 11:50 AM
Edited by: Alan Cecchini on Aug 20, 2010 12:11 PM

Hi Aaron,
I was hoping for a better more concrete answer to my questions.
I've had discussion with a number of experienced SAP developers and read many articles.
There is no definitive paper that sets out the best approach here but I have gleaned the following key points:
- Make interfaces asynchronous whenever possible to reduce system dependencies and improve the user experience (e.g. by eliminating wait times when they are not essential, such as by sending them an email with confirmation details rather than waiting for the server to respond)
- It is the responsibility of the client to handle errors in synchronous scenarios hence monitoring lost through P-P services compared to the details information in transaction SXMB_MONI for PI services is not such a big issue. You can always turn on monitoring in SOAMANAGER to trace errors if need be.
- Choice of integration technique varies considerably by release level (for PI and Netweaver) so system landscape will be a significant factor. For example, we have some systems on Netweaver 7.0 and other on 7.1. As you need 7.1 for direction connection PI services we'd rather wait until all systems are at the higher level than have mixed usage in our landscape - it is already complex enough.
- We've not tried the AAE option in a Production scenarios yet but this is only really important for high volume interfaces, something that is not a concern at the moment. Obviously cumulative performance may be an issue in time so we plan to start looking at AAE soon.
Hope these comments may be useful.
Alan

PI 7.11 - Alert creation for RFC Exceptions does not work

Hi folks!
In our PI 7.11 SP04 system we have created an Alert Category as well as an Alert Rule to be informed about errorneous messages in the Integration Engine (ABAP).
The scenario is synchronous SOAP Axis to sRFC, where the RFC answers with an exception that is transferred to a SOAP Fault response message.
Now we see messages with Application Errors in the Integration Engine, but no alert is created. Having a look at the alert creation log using report SXMSALERT_LOGREADER shows us that the system even does not try to create an alert for these messages. Alerts are only created for errors in the Adapter Engine.
Question:
Why does the system not create alerts in this case and how can we achieve this?
Thanx for any hint!
Kind Regards,
Volker

Hi!
Additional information for all:
When forcing an error like "receiver not found" both kinds of alerts are created: AE Alert and IE Alert. Thus in general the alert configuration and the alert rule for IE errors are correct and working - only not for RFC exceptions ....
Regards,
Volker

To restrict Issue for production than planned qty in production order

Hi Experts,
In my scenario, the production staff will prepare production order and right click in production order document and select "Issue Components" option to Issue raw materials for production floor. After issuing the raw materials to production floor closes the "Issue for Production" document and now we have "Production Order" document open in screen. When he again select "Issue Components" option and issues the raw materials once again. Materials are issued once again wrongly. This happens since the production order document is not getting refresh after "Issue for Production" document is done.
Is there any way to restrict issue of raw materials than the planned qty.?
I have tried lot of ways to restrict this through SP. Please revert me an solution to this issue.
The procedure should trigger immediately when the "Issue Components" option is selected second time (If the raw materials are issued in full in first time itself). And it should allow only the qty which is to issued to production order qty (if they issue part issue to production order)
Thanks in advance
Raja.S

Hi Neetu,
Thanks for your quick response. I have tried this query. But it is not blocking the issue for production document even the raw materials are issued already for the production order.
I'll explain my work flow again. The Production staff will prepare production order and then release the same and update the production order after changing the status for "Release". Then he will right click the Mouse button and select "Issue Components" option and perform the Issue for Production process. He will issue the required raw material completely in one shot and add the Issue for Production document.
After adding the Issue for Production document he will close that document and now we will be in Production order document. Now our production order document will not get refreshed. Now the Production staff go for "Issue components" option, then it should not allow him to issue the components once again. But it is allowing him to issue components any number of times. there is no control.
If we browse the production order document to previous record and browse back to the same record then my Production order document get refreshed and now we can control the issue. But what should i do to control in the earlier case. Since they want to perfrom lot of production order, there is a chance to issue components for same production order more than one time before the production order document get refreshed.
Please provide me the SP to control this scenario.
Thanks in advance.
Raja.S

Iphone 4s calendar alert issue

I tend to put 2 alerts on my calendar events, one for 1 day before and the second one for 1 hour before (or some other on the day of event). I have noticed that when I put in the first alert for 1 day before and then enter the second alert for 1 hour before and click done they have somehow been reversed, the first alert is now 1 hour before and the second alert is 1 day before. I have to click them again and change them to the proper order, this usually take about 3 tries to get them to stay as I want them. I can them save the event and all is good. I was at the Apple store and the staff duplicated this issue so I know I'm not the only one experiencing this nuissance. Has anyone else come across this? I do hope the upcoming update will fix it.

Update since Genius visit:
1) Apple is working on an update
2) There is no awareness at Apple of this calendar alert issue as a bug, hence it is not being addressed/worked on
3) Solutions offered by Genius have not resolved this issue.
Solutions offered by Genius, in order of which to try first:
1) Delete calendar data from iPhone: Settings>iCloud>Calendars OFF and then restore data from iCloud: Calendars ON
2) Reset iPhone settings: Settings>General>Reset>Reset all settings
3) Restore to factory settings: Settings>General>Reset>Erase all content and settings, then restore data from iCloud and in-app backups.
4) Use another calendar app (seriously)
Of course, if the bug is actually part of the iOS software (could it be?) then no amount of erasing and restoring data will fix the issue. I completed the first two options with no change, and am not willing to do the third option because I am not interested in going through the process of backing up, then restoring all my third-party apps.
My solution: raise awareness of this issue with Apple, so that it can be worked on and fixed. I have reported it as a bug through Apple's feedback module: http://www.apple.com/feedback/iphone.html and I encourage-- no, ask-- you to do the same, if you are experiencing this issue. I provided a link to this forum topic to show the variety and detail of problems.
Are you sick of missing alerts, fiddling endlessly, coming up with workarounds, paying for unreliable software, and not being responded to? I am. It's time to rally!

Error while adding the issue for production (item cost not found)

Hi all,
The scenario is,
when the user is trying to add the issue for production system is showing error item cost not
found.The item which is issued is Inventory + purchase item with manual issue method.The valuation
method for that item is FIFO.since the valuation method is FIFO,error related to item cost should
not occur.
Since the valuation method is FIFO.Item cost error should not occur.
The error related to item cost must not occur at the time of issue for production.
Regards-
Mona.

Hi!
Please check these threads
Sales Delivery Document
Item Cost Error
No item cost was found

How to get Alerts mail for adapter engine errors in SAP PI 7.0

Hi Friends,
I configured Alerts in PI 7.0. with the help of t-code u2018ALRTCATDEF and created a new alert catergory.
In container tab i have mentioned all give below elements.
SXMS_MSG_GUID, SXMS_RULE_NAME, SXMS_ERROR_CAT, SXMS_ERROR_CODE, SXMS_FROM_PARTY, SXMS_FROM_SERVICE, SXMS_FROM_NAMESPACE, SXMS_FROM_INTERFACE, SXMS_TO_PARTY, SXMS_TO_SERVICE, SXMS_TO_NAMESPACE,SXMS_TO_INTERFACE
I am getting alerts when I manually test the alerts configurations by running the report u2018RSALERTTESTu2019.
I am getting mail as :
Alert ID: ##00009##
Dear Administrator,
This is with respect to XI Scenario. During processing of XML file from ECC or XYZ Server, Following error has been occured:
Message ID:
Interface:
NOTE: To check the file name, go to SXMB_MONI and search for above message ID.
Double click on that message ID and click on error in left hand tree.
Please take appropriate action in co-ordination with respective functional and BASIS consultant.
But When I am getting a error , I am not getting an alert mail. Right now iam doing in XI Development.
I am not getting an Alert mail , when my message is in status of : System Error . Error catergory is : XI_J2EE_ADAPTER_JDBC.
Kindly tell how to get alert mail for error catergory : XI_J2EE_ADAPTER_JDBC and in Adapter engine errors.
How to get alert mail when my message is failed with any reason in Adapter engine.
Waiting for quick replay. Please help me out.
Regards,
Ahmed.

Hi thanks for quick reply.
As per your given link : http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/14877. [original link is broken]
I have done all these steps. But still little problem.
as per link he is getting Error description , error message id , alert rule..
In my case I am not getting these information. when my messages failed. When I am doing manully testing the alert getting an mail as :
Alert ID: ##00009##
Dear Administrator,
This is with respect to XI Scenario. During processing of XML file from ECC or XYZ Server, Following error has been occured:
Message ID:
Interface:
NOTE: To check the file name, go to SXMB_MONI and search for above message ID.
Double click on that message ID and click on error in left hand tree.
Please take appropriate action in co-ordination with respective functional and BASIS consultant.
Is it okay the body of mail??.
I am not getting alert mail when my messages failed in adapter engine and Integration Engine.
Ex my message is failed in AE:as below.
My messages flow as : SAP --> XI --> DB.
Messages is success (in ECC moni)> XI moni also success> XI Adapter engine getting error as (Status: System Error) and (Error Category : XI_J2EE_ADAPTER_JDBC).
Regards,
Ahmed.

Alerts-Idoc to File Scenario using BPM

Dear all,
At the sender side,I am sending 2 Idoc's orders03,orders04 Idocs I am Merging in to single at my mapping level and sending to the respective receivers.
When even some error occurs at system level or application level,an alert must be sent to the respective valid receipents.
My question is,when creating the Alert Rule how to use the interfaces(orders03,04) (here I have multiple senders).
Is Alert rule required in BPM scenario's?if not let me know how alerts would be triggered for bpm scenarios.
Thanks,
Srini

Hi,
Let me see if I had you requirement correct.
When the Idoc is sent from R3, sender partner type is LS and Receiver Partner Type is LI.
If yes,
1. Create a Party in ID.
2. The Agency , Scheme and Identifier will have values,
Agency --> Receiver Business System name or Business Service Name to be used for File.
Scheme --> ALE#LI
Identiier --> Value of the RCVPRN field in the idoc control Record. Basically the Receiver Partner Name.
All the Configuration In ID will use this Party as the Receiver Party and the corresponding Service asthe Receiver service.
No need for a sender party as sender partner is LS.
Regards
Bhavesh

Can't see messages on sxi_monitor for sync scenario?

Hi gurus,
We are using PI 7.11. We found after no operation for ESR or ID for a long time, the system pops up the error "no authorization...", then we have to click esr on pi main page and logon again. Is there any parameter to change the user session or somthing?
Thanks in advance.

your subject line seems different to the issue you are having...
or they could be the same! have you set the messaging logging for sync scenarios in SXMB_ADM?
can you explain the actual problem you are having? it makes no sense.

Inspection Lot status not getting changed to LTCA from REL for SubCon scenario

Dear All,
For ERSA material 01 inspection type is active with indicator Post to inspection stock only as it can be purchased. No other indicator is set.
This material can be sent for repairing outside with DAMAGE valuation type (stock provided to Vendor with DAMAGE valuation type).
For SubCon scenario, Purchase Order with Account Assignment Category F and Item Category L has been created.
Once GR using MB01 with 101 movement, consumption posting takes place and as Insp type 01 is active Inspection lot is getting created with status REL CALC.
At this time, DAMAGE stock against Vendor is getting reduced with Qty of 543 movement.
Now when, reversal 102 with MB01 is done against Purchase Order and details are adopted with reference to 101 material document, reversal is taking place, but at the same time respective material doc's Inspection lot status is not getting changed to LTCA. It remains REL only.
For 122 return to Vendor using MBRL also, Insp lot status is not getting changed.
Has anybody faced such issue? Is this standard SAP?
Kindly throw light on the process, is correct process followed?
Regards,
Tanuj Parikh

Thanks.
Thru MBST Inspection Lot status changed to LTCA.
Why system is not cancelling thru MB01?

SAP TAO | getting an error "replay Error" for the scenario

Hi,
I am getting the "replay error" for a scenario.
When tested the individual components, they were passing separately in HP ALM, but when consolidate all of those test cases in one test scenario then this error "replay error" is shown.
Could anyone help in resolving this issue.
regards,
Sunil Kumar

Dear sunil kumar
You have posted the query in Career Center..
Is your question related about Career ???
Please read the document before posting any query.
Find Topic Spaces on SCN (Forums)

Output Issue for order confirmation

We have a sales order contains 3 line items 10,20 & 30.
We have found the line item 30 has been created in the sales order change log,. after the line items 10 and 20 has created.
The print output copy is having 4 pages.
In that print preview the header data was appearing for item 10 on page 1 and the same header data was re-appearing for item 30 on page 3.
For better understanding we have taken the generated spool files of the sales order and compared with the print output copies which was sent by the user.
Also we found that all the header details ( sold-t0 & ship-to addresses ) are generating in the SAP spool file for all the 3 line items 10,20 & 30. Here the output is z output type.
But the header details are printing in the PDF ( print output ) for line item 10 and 30 only. ( Not printing for item 20 ).
As per the SAP print program, whatever layout is generated in SAP, same thing should print in PDF
So as we assume that there is some mismatch in the layout mapping. ( here the layout is JETFORM Server )
But we are not sure about the problem ?
Please help me on this ...

Hi,
This can be due to various problems,
First check if there is any bug in the program itself. have a walkthrough. Once this is ensured, process one document in debugging mode for similar scenario and then check the spool.
You can convert the spool into PDF using your own program and then use the same spool for PDF conversion using some SAP programs like RSTXPDF4 etc. If there is an issue with your program, you can find out using these cases.
Also, there can also be problems which are printer specific. I would suggest you to test in different printers. Then only you can decide if ABAPer needs to fix it or you need a BASIS guy.

PI alert issue for synchrounous scenarios

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for