Picture display quality in Photoshop is bad

I bought a new camera and bought Photoshop Elements 9 with it.  I took a bunch of pictures and was very disapointed with the camear's picture quality (or so I thought).  I then returned the camera.  As I was awaiting my new one, I decided to post to some forums about my poor image quality with the camera (A Lumix DMC-LX5) to see if maybe the camera was actually defective since it gets such good reviews.  As I was posting the pictures, I realized that they looked great when displayed in Firefox.  So I opened the images in every program I had installed that could display pictures and found the following:
Good
IE9
Firefox 4
Microsoft Office 2010
Paint
Quicktime Picture Viewer
Windows Media Center
Bad
Photoshop Elements 9
Windows Picture Viewer
The image below (best viewed in one of the "good" programs), shows a good image on the left opened in Quicktime Picture Viewer, and the bad image on the right open in Windows Picture Viewer (picture looks exactly the same in Photoshop Elements).  The funny thing is that the screen shot picks up the diffrence which can be seen in any of the viewers now while the original picture only displays poorly when viewed in the "bad" viewers.
Example below:  The asphalt and the grass in the picture on the right look very blotchy. The image on the left is what it looks like to the naked eye.  I have dozens of pictures where this same thing can be seen.
I wouldn't care if they all were bad but Elements but seing as how I'll be looking at them mostly in organizer, I realy need to get this resolved.  Any guidance would be appreciated.
One Note:  This is significantly more noticable with the DMC-LX5.  I don't notice this with my D90 images in RAW (the DMC-LX5 was high res jpeg).

The fact that pictures look right after disabling color management suggest that there may be a color profile problem.
Your 'good looking' softwares are not color managed (Firefox has an option to do so...)
Photoshop Elements is color managed, that is able to recognize a profile and use it.
When you open an image, in the lower bar showing the zoom %, you have another setting display drop down menu. Click on the little black triangle and choose 'Document profile'. Tell us what is shown : sRGB, AdobeRGB or whatever. Also, is there an option to select those profiles in your cameras ?
Normally you should never use the option 'No color management'. Especially if you shoot raw : in Elements, your raw files will be considered sRGB if the Editor preference is set to 'Always optimize color for computer screens', and it is considered AdobeRGB if it is set to 'Always optimize for printing'.

Similar Messages

  • Image display QUALITY controll bar/change/modifi

    Hello
    the bridges display quality of jpegs and raw images is awfull!!!
    i see blockiness in all of my images, how can i watch my photos like this??
    there is no crispness!
    u should made a picture display quality controll bar like speed-------quality
    so the user can select!

    Frosti,
    This request has been made many times. The development team are aware of the need for 100% previews. However, such a feature, if provided, will not be available until at least Bridge 2. Based on previous upgrade cycles that would be late 2006, at earliest. In the meantime you might consider providing more information on the type of images you're trying to preview (i.e. Raw, JPG, etc).
    Also, I would suggest that you soften the tone of your comments otherwise you'll find yourself with Read Only access.
    IanLyons
    Forum Host

  • When creating a windows video several pictures display black screen although it plays fine in photoshop. What is causing this?

    I have tried rebooting, recreating from scratch again, sometimes the pictures show broken in photoshop and I recreate the thumbnail and they look fine.

    Take your MBP to an Apple store genius bar for a free diagnostic examination.  Since these symptoms are 'regular' and not intermittent, they should be able to determine what the problem is and the cure.
    ciao.

  • Poor full screen display quality

    I am in a dual-display environment. One display I have set up as a full-screen display for images as I edit them in Aperture. They show up in a dismally poor quality; a grid-like low resolution. When I zoom in on them, the issue goes away. It's just when an image is displayed in its entirety. This is a 20" Cinema display. Note that there is no display quality issue with Photoshop. Thanks.

    Which picture is the refence picture?
    I have been noticing that the same image in different programes does look different, colour and tone.. Now I understand that as each programe reads the data differently. BUT with Aperture I have noticed this is the case within aperture and this is crazy.
    The photo is different in the loupe again different in the full frame version and yet again with in the grid. So when using the loupe is it possible to compare images enlarged from the grid and so on! and on. and the exported images look diferent again when viewed...
    Strange as it is all on one monitor!
    Or am I the only one to notice this?
    icu2

  • Ps CS6 Request: User control over display quality versus performance (modified request)

    It would be great if there was user control of the zoom threshold at which display quality is sacrificed for performance.
    I mean the threshold which determines the maintaining of bit-depth in the calculation of the composite which is displayed when working with 16-bit documents, and the accuracy of displayed layer effects in documents with any bit-depth.
    The threshold currently seems to be approx 64% zoom - not much of a zoom out when dealing with large images destined for print.
    Please provide a control for that threshold in Preferences > Performance.

    Thank you for posting, conroy. I have an example of the inconvenient effects of Photoshop CS6 allowing the zoomed-out composite to be innaccurate.
    Here's a real-world application for everyone to see.
    In my below example you're not seeing a 16-bit doc, just 8-bit, BTW.
    Top C has Layer Styles. Bottom C is a copy that's been merged with a blank layer, to effectively "collapse" it's Layer Styles into a normal single pixel layer.
    The difference is staggering. This file is a massize 28x36 300DPI (8,400px  X  10,800px) poster.
    So on something like this, while working and tweaking everything you work worked zoomed out so you see enough of the document to be able monitor it's evolution.
    I was working at 25% zoom (depisted above) for a quite a while. Got everything good, but then zoomed in only to see that each letter actually looked like pretty bad compared to what the zoomed composite was telling me.
    I had to revise all letters.
    For hi-res print I guess I better get used to zooming in and out constantly, so I know what to trust.
    I wonder if this issue will ever be rectified. Like Conroy suggests, maybe a setting that allows users to voluntarily sacrifice performance in favor of a more accurate composite?

  • Which setting should I have my apple tv set for picture resolution/quality it takes like a whole day for a movie to download before we can watch it

    Which setting should I have my apple tv set for picture resolution/quality as it can take a whole day to download a movie before we can watch it??

    The video/audio display settings should set automatically for the best your TV can handle (720p AppleTV2, 1080p AppleTV3).
    The download resolution for rentals or playback of purchases from the cloud is set in settings for iTunes store.
    Sounds as though you have slow internet.  For near instant streaming of video from iTunes store you need around:
    Standard Definition     2.5 Mbps
    720p HD                    6 Mbps
    1080p HD                  8 Mbps
    Any slower for a given quality setting and the movie has to buffer as it can't keep up in real time.  This might be a few minutes if close to the rated speed or many hours, even overnight.
    As pcd251s suggests you could test internet speed (speedtest.net on a computer for example).  If that is fine, sometimes the LAN if on wifi can be extremely slow in certain locations - ethernet connections would troubleshoot that.
    Slow internet is the common issue here.  AppleTV does not have permanent storage and using it to play other content or browse trailers while a rental is buffering can reset the buffering process.   In such cases you might be better off planning in advance, renting in iTunes, letting the whole thing FULLY download and it will then be available across teh LAN to stream from computer to AppleTV under Computers>iTunes library name>Rentals.
    AC

  • Display quality changed

    This is weird... My iPod nano spontaneously reset while I was using it, and after that I noticed that the display quality seems to have gone down. Pictures that previously had smooth color transitions now appear dithered. It almost looks as if the bit depth of the display decreased. Has anybody seen anything like this?? Am I going nuts here??
    Resetting the iPod didn't fix this. Replacing the images did not fix this. Help?

    Agreed, reset the Nano but use the iPod updater to get fresh code back in. A clickwheel+button reset continues reusing corrupted code.

  • "Photoshop.exe - Bad Image" error [CS3]

    Hi everyone,
    I use Photoshop CS3, and every time I go to open a new document or open a saved document/picture/etc. I get a "Photoshop.exe - Bad Image" error that reads:
    The application or DLL C:\WINDOWS\System32\spool\DRIVERS\W32X86\3\HPZRPP04.DLL is not a valid Windows image. Please check this against your installation diskette.
    I have to "OK" this message 4 times until I am able to use the program. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thank you,
    Peter

    HPZRPP04.DLL
    Have you tried updating or reinstalling your HP printer? If it's a network printer, try setting up a local printer as the default printer and see if that error goes away.

  • I have a Mac computer and am trying to use a Photoshop CS4 program, but after accessing my desktop files through Adobe Bridge and clicking twice on any of the pictures to get into Photoshop,  instead of entering photoshop I get an enlarged version of the

    I have a Mac computer and am trying to use a Photoshop CS4 program, but after accessing my desktop files through Adobe Bridge and clicking twice on any of the pictures to get into Photoshop, instead of entering photoshop, I get on the lefthand side an enlarged version of the picture with red, yellow and green buttons on top. Any suggestions on what is wrong, or what can be corrected ?

    And there is the problem. Your pictures are opening up in Mac's own Preview app.
    Do you want all your jpegs to open in Photoshop, or only when you are in Bridge?
    Selecting a program to open a certain file is called: File Type Association.
    You can choose this at the MacOS level or the Bridge level.
    Here's how to do both:
    Either MacOS or Bridge has the wrong app associated with the jpeg. Let's start with MacOS
    Close Bridge and Preview. Select one of your jpegs, and press Cmd i, That will bring up the file info window.
    Go down to the "Open with" section of File Info.
    Choose Photoshop CS4 and click on the Change All... button to apply this choice to every jpeg on your Mac.
    Then open Bridge and see if double-clicking opens it in Photoshop.
    Now that means all jpegs on your Mac will open in Photoshop.  Maybe you don't want that.
    You can set your jpegs to open in Preview when Bridge is closed.
    When you open Bridge, there is Preferences > File Type Associations where you can direct Bridge to open the jpegs in Photoshop when you are viewing in Bridge.

  • Display quality in Editor

    I am a new user of PSE 8 and
    have the following problem:
    The image display quality is noticeably poorer in the Editor compared with the same image quality in organizer and a number of other jpg display programs(eg. Windows live photo gallery, Canon editing software). The effect is slightly washed out and lower contrast images. This was particularly noticeable working with old scanned black and white photos.
    I am running 64 bit windows 7, Nvidia graphics, 23 inch Samsung hi def LCD monitor.
    Any suggestions? 

    Originally posted by: d.kleinrath.inode.at
    Thanks Anthony,
    You mean that implementing a way to save higher quality image files also=
    =
    means that the resolution of the diagram needs to be changeable as a =
    whole? So one should be able to insert higher quality bitmaps into the =
    diagram once this is fixed?
    Dieter
    > Hi Dieter
    >
    > This is https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3D139574
    >
    > Cheers...
    > Anthony
    >
    >
    > "Dieter Kleinrath" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:op.ujhu5xe8pj7es5@ben-f9ea5088efe...
    >> Hi,
    >>
    >> Is there any way to change the resolution of a GMF diagram so I can
    >> display and print high quality images in my editor?
    >>
    >> When I create a default editor the resolution of a Din A4 diagram see=
    ms =
    >> to
    >> be about 1000x700 pixel (~85 DPI). This is a very low quality for
    >> displaying/printing images so I'd like to use diagrams with 300 DPI o=
    r
    >> more in my editor.
    >>
    >> Thanks for your help,
    >> Dieter

  • Aperture missing "Picture Package"equivalent to photoshop???

    Correct me if I am wrong, but it seems that aperture is limited to printing very crude contact sheets that really do not compare to photoshops "picture package".
    Basically I tried to print two 8x12s(different images) on a 13x19 photo paper. Ultimately I ended up going into photoshop where I resized the two images to 8x12s and positioned them onto a new 13x19 canvas. This then was a newly created file that I reimported back into aperture. I know this is not really a good work flow, but it seems that aperture has not even thought out a very crude picture package equivalent to photoshop
    Also there is no measurement showing inches just pixels. It would be nice if they could show a ruler layout on the image it self similar to photoshop. Resizing in photoshop is much more practicle and straight forward.
    I here that lightroom is far better for printing packages also.
    Does any one agree about these shortcommings???

    This is a glaring omission that has been noted since day 1 of Aperture 1.0, made more frustrating by the very robust printing features available in Lightroom. Surely Apple is aware of the problem, and hopefully they will find a fix in 1.6 or 2.0 or whatever comes next, but it's aggravating to know that a fairly sophisticated app like Aperture requires shareware oddities like ImageBuddy or Portraits-n-Prints in order to get packages working.
    Time to fix this one, Apple. (Get the book tool working usefully while you're at it too!)

  • How can I get the picture to show in Photoshop?  The thumbnail image appears in the right side panel but the full image isn't showing at all.

    How can I get the picture to show in Photoshop CS3?  The thumbnail image appears in the right side panel but the full image isn't showing at all.

    What specific information would you need?  The program was working just fine early yesterday morning and than when I came back in the afternoon to edit  some more pictures that is when I wasn't able to see the full image anymore.  It is providing me with all of the editing options as if the picture is there but it is just a blank screen with the thumbnail pic showing in the right panel. 

  • When I go to edit a picture from Lightroom to Photoshop it does not open in Photoshop, it use to work before the latest update, but I deleted the last version of CC and now it isn't editing photos!  HELP please required.

    When I go to edit a picture from Lightroom to Photoshop it does not open in Photoshop, it use to work before the latest update, but I deleted the last version of Photoshop CC and now it isn't editing photos!
    Lightroom opens up Photoshop but the image doesn't appear!  Any help gratefully needed!

    Ok I sorted it, by uninstalling and re-installing Photoshop

  • Can i use a monitor as a picture display

    can i use a monitor as a picture display without any PC?

    have you already tried a another adapter?
    perhaps is just the pin for the green informations destroyed?
    regards, stefan

  • Os windows 7 trying to install PhotoKit 2.06 in CS4 getting 'Owl Orphanage: Photoshop.exe - Bad Image. Have tried downloading Photokit from a different source - same problem. How can I get this to install please?

    Has anyone had a problem installing PhotoKit 2.06 in CS4? I keep getting 'Owl Orphanage: Photoshop.exe Bad Image. I have tried installation files from 2 different sources without success. Pixel Genius suggested dropping the unzipped files directly into Plug-ins -  that didn't work. Any suggestions would be appreciated.

    Hi Peter
    I am in touch with Pixel Genius, the plug-in developer, and so far ( this has been going on for 5 days) a solution has not been forthcoming, hence my post. The required files are shown in Windows Explorer but will not load when I fire up CS4. Previously, I ran version 1.2.4 of PhotoKIt without a problem but that was uninstalled to make way for the latest software. Pixel Genius have asked me to open up CS4 Help, System info, and send it to them which I have done. I wait in hope!
    John

Maybe you are looking for