Pint out different than monitor image

The print outs I get with Lightroom look competely different than any other program's printouts including Adobe Photoshop CS2. The color is not the same. I assume this relates to color management, but I set up the monitor and Photoshop seems fine. Lightroom colors are washed out in comparison, though both look similar on screen. What is going on? How can I fix this issue?

Jeremy, first look at the posts/threads on this here on the forum. There are lots and I am sure you will find the solution to your dilema.

Similar Messages

  • New Photsmart Premium c410 printing darker than monitor image

    I just purchased a new HP Photosmart Premium c410 and all photos come out darker or not as bright as the monitor image.  On setup it never did pass the alignment test although the test print looks good.  The print quality test print looks good with good color and seperation in the color bars and excellent sharpness in the text print.  I replaced an HP photosmart 3310 with this new one and it is not producing photo lab quality prints.  Any help?  I'm using the cartridges and hp paper that came with the printer.

    Hi - I had exactly the same problem. Here is how I resolved it.
    When you click print on your poc the print dialogue bo opens
    go to "Properties", then to "Advanced"
    you should see a menu tree that has "printer features" &, within that, "Color Management". Mine was set to :- "Color Smart" however, I changed to "Adobe RGB...... 2.2 Gamma.." - This solved the problem for me.
    I hope it works for you.
    Regards

  • Jpeg looks different than actual Image in Photoshop (saving Issues)

    My image in photoshop has thin lines, but when I save it, the jpeg shows the image with very thick dark lines, looking not like the image in photoshop. Why does it do this? How can I stop PS from doing this to my image? I want the image to look as it does in Photoshop when I save it as a Jpeg.
    This is in Photoshop CS4
    As it should be (using the snipping tool (I can't use the snipping tool as my only option, because it will only capture the size as it is on the screen, not the actual dimensions in Photoshop)
    Saved as a Jpeg; the lines are thicker, and now there is little variation in line weight
    Does anyone have a solution? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Just one comment...  Your lines in your screen grab are NOT thinner, they are simply a good bit lighter.
    You should try to use the proper terminology, because you will end up realizing, when C.Pfaffenbichler helps you get to the bottom of your problem, that you likely are experiencing a gamma/color-management issue causing your pixels to be displayed far more lightly in one case than another.
    Besides your color settings in Photoshop, it will also be helpful to know what color profile is associated with your monitor at the operating system level.
    -Noel
    P.S., I don't know what result you're going for, but the JPEG with the darker lines looks a lot better on a calibrated display.  The screen grab seems too light.

  • When I open an exported image after editing it, it is completely different than the image in Lightroom

    I edit an image in Lightroom and happy with the results I export (save) onto my computer.  When I then open the image it looks completely different to the one I just edited and saved!  Very frustrating!  I did not take it in raw format,  I have taken all the photos already and cannot retake them. I am new to Lightroom, only on trial at the moment.
    Help much appreciated

    There are 9 different versions of iPhoto and they run on eight different versions of the Operating System. The tricks and tips for dealing with issues vary from version to version and OS to OS. So before anyone can help, they need information to work with. Things like:
    - What version of iPhoto.
    - What version of the Operating System.
    - Details. What were you doing when the problem arose?
    - Did it ever work properly?
    - Are there error messages?
    - What steps have you tried already to solve the issue.

  • Need help The image I saw on the LCD looks different than the actual photo

    i had canon camera and had problem The image I saw on the LCD looks different than the actual photo.any body can kelp me
    [IMG]http://tralalatrilili.ga/thanks.png[/IMG]

    Do you capture in RAW or JPEG? What software do you use to view your image? Is your monitor calibrated? What is the brightness level on your camera LCD? All of these information can affect your image. And keep in mind that image on the back of the camera is often brighter and more saturated.
    Weekend Travelers Blog | Eastern Sierra Fall Color Guide

  • .swf image comes out lighter than the source

    I'm creating a simple animation in AE from a jpeg image. I bring up some text on the image. When I create the .swf file, the background that the text appears on is lighter than the original jpeg in the Safari browser. Since this animation "tiles" into the page with other jpegs sharing the same background image, the light background produced by the .swf stands out from the rest of the page.
    This only seems to appear in the Safari browser under OSX. FireFox doesn't have this problem. However, since I need this to work across all browsers, I need to solve this issue.
    If I make a .mov file instead of a .swf, it also appears lighter than the source.
    In fact, if I simply take a jpeg image and create a 1 frame .swf from it, it comes out lighter than the original. I'm not doing anything to the image (as far as I know) that would make it lighter.
    Any insight to what is causing this problem would be greatly appreciated.

    It's ColorSync and how it is used throughout your system, even if only for on-screen Gamma correction. In so many words: There's nothing you can do about it but to reset your settings and turn it off wherever that is possible. Not on my Mac ATM and not using Safari anyways, but I'm reasonably certain there's an option for using the system color settings somewhere. Depending on how you process the JPEG you may also need to fiddle with the color settings for the Adobe suite. Flash itself is not color profiled, but it will respect embedded proviles by ways of its image loaders that it shares with Photoshop and al lthe other apps. Beyond that I wouldn't get too crazy over it: Color mismatches and shifting alignment are a natural bane of all web development, and even if you get it right on one machine, the next day another user will tell you that it looked crap on his machine in Konqueror on Linux.... More than anything else, webdesign is a matter of using the design to cheat around these limitations, unfortunately. Perhaps you can use a large background Flash file instead of the original JPEG and then put your HTML content onto a separate DIV layer...? ;-)
    Mylenium

  • Why are images displayed in Photoshop different than the same images displayed in Indesign?

    My images imported to Indesign do NOT display as the images in Photoshop.
    They seem to display under different color profiles.
    The images in Indesign are more desaturated than the images in Photoshop.
    This is a problem because now I don't know which image appearance to trust!
    How can you get the Indesign images to look like the images in Photoshop?
    I use Photoshop CS4 and Indesign CS3.
    I import the images from Photoshop to Indesign for exporting to a PDF as the base for Blurb printing (www.blurb.com).
    I use the CMYK profile Blurb_ICC_profile.icc:
    The images in PS4 are converted to Blurb_ICC_Profile (CMYK).
    Both in PS4 and ID3 the color settings are
                               Working spaces:
                                  CMYK: Blurb_ICC_profile
                               Color management Policies:
                                   CMYK:  Preserve Embedded Profiles.
    The images are imported into Indesign by drag and drop from Bridge CS4. In Bridge it says that the images have color profile CMYK, Blurb_ICC_profile.
    I also do get "Unsynchronized: Your Creative Suite Applications are not synchronized for consistent color."  And I don't seem to be able synchronize between CS3 and CS4, or whatever. I do NOT depend on any synchronization.
    The settings above should be enough to show the images consistently in Photoshop and Indesign.
    SO WHY DOES IT NOT?
    Should not Adobes own applications be able to keep color consistency?

    Hi WA Veghe,
    >First: DO synchronize, makes sure you have the same profile settings and color mange settings.
    I don't seem to be able to synchronize between CS4 (Photoshop) and CS3 (Indesign).
    It seems I have to do without synchronizing..
    >I do not seem to find HOW you are diplaying images on you screen: with Soft proofing?
    What happens if you soft proof in Photoshop and InDesign on screen: View > Proof colors. Do you proof with the same profiles, both simulate paper and black on?
    I can simulate Proof Colors (working CMYK), but not simulate Paper, both in Indesign and Photoshop.
    Problem is: SAME settings in Photoshop and Indesign BUT the image displayed in Photoshop is brighter and more saturated.
    So which image should I correct after?
    thanks for all help
    /L

  • The image in iPhoto is different than the photo

    when I select an image in iphoto the picture I click on is different than the one I chose

    Back up your iPhoto library, Depress and hold the option (alt) and command keys and launch iPhoto - rebuild your thumbnails - it may take a few attempts
    LN

  • Why are the photos i print much darker than the monitor image?

    why are the photos i print much darker than the monitor image?

    Please read this post then provide some details.  What printer model? What operating system? What program are you printing from?
    Some programs such as Photoshop give the option to print to CMYK or sRGB color spaces.  Even though the printer uses CMYK inks the driver is expecting sRGB data.  If CMYK is selected the prints will be much too dark.
    Another thing to check is the media type.  If you are printing on plain paper and have seelcted Photo paper the prints have too much ink.
    Bob Headrick,  HP Expert
    I am not an employee of HP, I am a volunteer posting here on my own time.
    If your problem is solved please click the "Accept as Solution" button ------------V
    If my answer was helpful please click the "Thumbs Up" to say "Thank You"--V

  • Thumnails different than images

    All of a sudden a few of my thumbnails are different than my acutal image. I rebuild my library, didn't work. By looking at the file name, I can tell the image is correct, but the thumbnail is incorrect. Any other ideas?

    Yea, this *****. I have this disease, as well.
    There's another thread on it somewhere. The best advice was to export the project and re-import. That assumes you know which ones are bad! I have nearly 30,000 images -- how the heck am I supposed to find all the bad thumbs, export, and re-import?

  • Lightroom displays colors differently than Photoshop

    Lightroom (and my image previewer - IfranView) display my image colors differently than photoshop.  This is very disturbing (why can't Adobe make this simple!)! 
    Image in question - see below.  Center image is Photoshop, left is Lr 4 and right is InfranView.
    Colorspace:  AdobeRGB 1998
    Image color (exported the TIFF file in Lr, what is shown below):  AdobeRGB 1998
    NOTE:  when I export out as sRGB, IfranView displays it correctly (I don't know why, it can't display ProPhoto correctly, but never had a problem with AdobeRGB).  Lightroom looks incorrect when viewing the TIFF, AdobeRGB JPEG and sRGB JPEG.
    What is going on??  I've tried this on two computers now and it is the same problem!

    The larger file is Adobe RGB and the smaller file is sRGB.  I see no difference in overall tone or color between the two files in LR 3, LR 4, LR 5, PS CS5, PS CS6, PS CC 2014, or Windows Photo Viewer which is color-managed, aside from an almost imperceptible change in the darkest blacks which I'd expect since you're converting AdobeRGB to sRGB at some point.
    I can make the Adobe RGB one look like it does at the left of your first screenshot if I Assign Profile: sRGB to it in PS.
    Since your monitor appears to be wide-gamut and therefore similar to Adobe RGB, I think the problem you're having is that LR thinks the monitor is sRGB for some reason, perhaps due to your switching the cables from one computer to the other without rebooting and recalibrating.  It's also possible that your profile is stored in the monitor rather than in the computer and one computer understands this and the other doesn't so you're getting double-profiling or no profiling occurring.
    It sounds the your only issue is having two computers attached alternatively to one monitor without having a valid profile on each computer for that monitor and aren't restarting each computer to load that profile.  At least that is my analysis given the limited information.
    I would conclude that nothing is wrong with LR or PS just the hardware connections and the color management confusion between the two computers, not your confusion, the computers'.

  • 32 bpc linear workflow -- render different than preview

    Hi,
    I've been experimenting with a 32 bpc linear workflow and have run into an issue where what I see in the preview window (what I want) looks very different than what is rendered out. The difference seems to be caused by a curves adjustment layer-- it almost seems like it is ignored on final output.
    A screenshot of the preview window:
    What the image looks like during a RAM preview or when rendered:
    The RAM preview looks correct though (or like the 1st image) when I go to Preferences-->Previews-->set "Color Management Quality" to "MoreAccurate"
    I'm using sRGB linearalized working space. Outputting to an 8 bpc TIFF sequence with output profile set to sRGB (I'm not sure what to do with the "Convert to Linear Light setting"-- does "On for 32 bpc" mean on when the input is set to 32 bpc, or when the output is set to 32 bpc? -- either way this setting doesn't appear to fix the issue)
    This particlular project doesn't really use any of the things 32 bpc is good for, but I'm very interested in figuring out a fix for future use.
    Here's the project file if anyone is interested in taking a look:
    cs6 version
    cs5.5 version
    Any help would be greatly appreciated
    Thanks!
    --Ross

    You must have use display color management turned off or simulate output set incorrectly. Notice the difference between this setup and your screenshots.
    If you are going to use color management you must use the whole banana. You must calibrate your monitor. You must render to formats that support color management. With only a portion turned on output will never match the preview.
    One more suggestion. If you're having problems with a render please send us a project with the failed render still in the render CUE. Your projects were comps only.

  • How do I get my laptop to remember different display arrangements for different external monitors?

    I have a couple of different places where I work, and in both places there is an external monitor. As it turns out, the external monitor is on the left in one place and on the right in the other. They are different monitors, too (one's an old dell and one's a mac monitor). I remember in previous versions of Mac OS X, my MacBook would remember the display arrangement depending on which monitor was connected, and place my secondary desktop on the correct side. In Mavericks, it seems to maintain the arrangement from the last place that I changed it. 
    What this means is rather than my computer remembering where my external monitor should be, I have to change the arrangement of my monitors every time I switch desks.
    Is this a feature that Apple removed from Mavericks? Was I imagining things in older versions of OSX?

    "Is there a way to display my iPhone in the finder?"
    No. You can't. It's not an external drive.

  • Use different "fx-border-image-source" for first tab and remaining tabs

    Hi,
    I'm using something like this
    .tab {
    -fx-padding: 0px 5px -2px 5px;
    -fx-background-insets: 0 -20 0 0;
    -fx-background-color: transparent;
    -fx-text-fill: #c4d8de;
    -fx-border-image-source: url("images/tab5.png");
    -fx-border-image-slice: 20 20 20 20 fill;
    -fx-border-image-width: 20 20 20 20;
    -fx-border-image-repeat: stretch;
    -fx-font-size: 22px;
    .tab:selected {
    -fx-border-image-source: url("images/tab-selected5.png");
    -fx-text-fill: #333333;
         -fx-background-color: red;*/
    to customize the tab appearance of a TabPane.
    That worked well. But I need to use a different set of images for just the first tab. Does anyone know a way to accomplish that?
    Thanks.

    How can I "fix up" the first tab of tab panes that are created after I "fixed up" the first tab of the initial tab pane?
    My app allows user to create new tab panes at any moment during program execution.Not easy to answer this one.
    The best answer would be to use structural pseudoclasses, but (as David points out), they are not yet implemented.
    The trick here is how to identify the first tab of each tab pane so that it can be styled separately from the other panes.
    Doing the styling without a dynamic lookup is preferrable to using a dynamic lookup (i.e. when the first tab is created give it a specific style, e.g. tab0).
    This is how the charts work, where they set style classes based on series of data, e.g. series0, series1 - this allows you to independently style each series of data.
    However the chart stuff has all of that built into the implementation, whereas the tabs don't. To achieve that you would likely need to go into the TabSkin code (http://openjdk.java.net/projects/openjfx/) find out where and how it generates the Tab nodes and write a custom tab skin or extension of the existing one which assigns a numeric style class to each new tab in a pane (e.g tab0, tab1, etc). In other words, not particularly easy if you are unfamilar with the tab skin implementation. You could log a javafx jira feature request to have those style classes set on tabs - file it here => http://javafx-jira.kenai.com.
    In the meantime a simple alternative is to use the dynamic lookup method in my previous post and a hack such that whenever you add a new tab pane to the scene you do something like the following:
    new Timeline(
      new KeyFrame(
        Duration.millis(50),
        new EventHandler<ActionEvent>() {
          @Override public void handle(ActionEvent arg0) {
            Node tab = newTabPane.lookup(".tab");
            if (tab != null) tab.getStyleClass().add("first-tab");
    ).play();The reason for the Timeline is that I don't really know at what stage the css layout pass is executed. I know that when you initially show the stage and then do a lookup, the css pass seems to have already been done and the lookup will work. But for something that is dynamically added or modified after the scene is displayed - I have no idea when the css layout pass occurs, other than it's some time in the future and not at the time that you add the tabPane to the scene. So, the Timeline introduces a short delay to (hopefully) give the css layout pass time to execute and allow the lookup to work (not return null). Not the best or most efficient solution, but should work for you.

  • Prints always come out darker than in lightroom

    I have a iMac, keep my screen calibrated using x-rite. I have found that all my prints come out darker than what I am seeing on screen. It almost seems like when I export a RAW file to JPG in lightroom it converts it to a denser image. As if it were taking 1/3 of the exposure out. I have done experiments with my own printer at home, as well as with two different labs here. I have downloaded the icc profiles of the different labs and have used PS4 to preview my images. There is no comparison and I can not see what step I might be missing to complete the process from image on screen to image on paper. Any help?? Thanks.

    True, I have seen a difference in the density of the prints from the lab and from my home printer and it is possible that I have used the printer settings in lightroom incorrectly. It is interesting that the prints from the lab are much denser than what I see on my screen. I loose overall brightness and detail in the shadows. It seems like my colors are correct but with the loss of brightness it is hard to tell exactly. It almost seems to me as if somehow the conversion that lightroom does has something to do with how it is interpreted by the lab printer. The first test I did was to use the printer wizard (I have a cheapie epson home printer, epson stylus 405) just to see what would happen. My print came out EXACTLY as I see it on screen. That is what is my challenge. I can attach a file if it would help. THanks for all your responses.

Maybe you are looking for

  • TAXINJ and TAXINN cannot co exist ???any alternative

    hi , help and guidance is requrired urgently, As far as my understanding goes, TAXINJ and TAXINN cannot co exist in the same system. If you are talking about technical Upgrade, then I don't think this would be feasible since old Tax would have got po

  • Not able to remove/repair reader X

    Installed reader X on winxp pro. Immediate problems displaying pdf's - get message that readerX has encountered a problem and must close. When attempting to repair/remove and re-download, get win intaller message - patch package could not be opened -

  • SQL Server installation on Windows 8

    I am planning to buy a hybrid laptop/tablet device, to be specific – LENOVO IdeaPad Yoga 13 13.3" Touchscreen Ultrabook. This device comes with Windows 8 OS. It has so many things that are appealing to me. Now, my dilemma is that I'm not sure if it i

  • Gnome over SSH Painfully slow

    Hello all! Since recently upgrading to Tarantella 4, and have found that Gnome sessions over SSH to Redhat ES3 systems have become extremely slow. We can compare this performance change with Tarantella 3.42 because we have one of our original array m

  • Audigy 2 ZS Pro digital output and Windows XP Pro

    Recently "upgraded" my system to Windows XP Pro X64. My soundcard, an Audigy 2 ZS Pro, connects to my logitech 5. digital speakers via the front coaxial connector, no longer seems to output digital signal. The speakers indicate that there is no signa